封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2119599

芝加哥資料中心:市場佔有率分析、產業趨勢與統計及成長預測(2026-2031 年)

Chicago Data Center - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026 - 2031)

出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 90 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

根據 Mordor Intelligence 預測,芝加哥資料中心市場預計將從 2025 年的 1.9 GW 成長到 2026 年的 2.03 GW,然後從 2026 年到 2031 年以 6.73% 的複合年成長率成長,到 2031 年達到 2.81 GW。

芝加哥資料中心市場-IMG1

本報告按規模(小規模、中型、大型、超大型、巨型)、層級(Tier 1 & 2、Tier 3、Tier 4)和資料中心類型(託管、雲端服務供應商(CSP)、企業級、模組化、邊緣)對資料中心進行分類。市場預測以美元計價。

芝加哥資料中心市場的趨勢與洞察

對雲端服務供應商的需求正在激增。

隨著沿海主要市場的電力供應接近極限,超大規模營運商正在加速擴張。亞馬遜計劃在大西洋中部地區投資200億美元建造核能發電園區,這顯示已做好多元化位置的準備,而芝加哥也越來越有可能吸引類似的大型企劃。微軟和貝萊德斥資300億美元打造人工智慧基礎設施的合作項目已將中西部部分地區列為目標,而芝加哥則被定位為Equinix價值150億美元的xScale計畫的初始部署中心。金融市場對延遲的需求進一步加劇了這一趨勢,芝加哥商品交易所集團(CME Group)在奧羅拉市設立的谷歌雲端專用區域就清楚地體現了這些公司日益成長的需求。

企業對邊緣運算的需求不斷成長

全球邊緣運算市場預計到2024年將成長至2,320億美元,這正在重新定義芝加哥製造業、零售業和金融企業的位置要求。 CoreSite的CH2資料中心已獲得NVIDIA DGX-Ready認證,進一步凸顯了該都會區對人工智慧推理叢集的適應性。包括Comcast在內的電信業者正在將位於Northlake的這座資料中心部署為核心網,以支援5G、內容傳遞網路和低延遲OTT工作負載。

電力成本上漲(ComEd服務區域)

隨著資料中心需求的成長,電網調整費用也在上漲,預計將使用戶的月帳單增加10.50美元。由於PJM競標結算價格上漲,業者被迫採取措施對沖不斷上漲的容量成本。立法機構正在考慮採取保障措施,以防止超大規模營運對現有基礎設施造成過重負擔,並保護使用者的權益。

細分市場分析

到2025年,大型資料中心將佔芝加哥資料中心市場的44.12%。這反映出一個成熟的生態系統,能夠支援金融服務和傳統工作負載。然而,隨著人工智慧訓練叢集需要超過100兆瓦的持續電力供應,預計到2031年,巨型園區將以7.72%的複合年成長率成長,超過所有其他類型的資料中心。 T5公司位於郊區的480兆瓦園區和Compass公司在原西爾斯總部舊址進行的五棟建築改造項目都印證了這一轉變,這兩個項目的設計密度均超過每機架50千瓦。

儘管小規模機房對於邊緣運算和企業混合應用仍然具有可行性,但預計它們將逐漸被大規模批發設施所取代。超大規模租戶更青睞超大型設施提供的營運優勢和客製化的機電拓撲結構,這迫使小規模機房的所有者透過提供針對延遲關鍵型應用和特定合規性要求的服務來脫穎而出。

其他好處:

  • Excel格式的市場預測(ME)表
  • 3個月的分析師支持

目錄

第1章:引言

  • 研究假設和市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章:調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場狀況

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場促進因素
    • 雲端服務供應商需求激增
    • 企業對邊緣運算的需求日益成長
    • 強大的光纖連接生態系統
    • 伊利諾伊州的獎勵計劃和稅收優惠
    • 北維吉尼亞地區溢出效應導致對剩餘產能的需求
    • 美國中西部地區的人工智慧訓練工作負載正面臨電力供應不足的問題。
  • 市場限制因素
    • 電力成本上漲(ComEd服務區域)
    • 土地和建築成本上漲
    • 由於密西根湖用水限制,冷氣受到限制。
    • 併網許可核准流程變得越來越漫長。
  • 價值供應鏈分析
  • 監理情勢
  • 技術展望
  • 關鍵需求指標
    • 智慧型手機用戶
    • 每部智慧型手機的資料通訊
    • 行動資料通訊速度
    • 寬頻資料通訊速度
  • 波特五力分析
  • 市場宏觀經濟趨勢的評估

第5章 市場規模及成長預測(兆瓦)

  • 按資料中心規模
    • 小規模
    • 中號
    • 大規模
    • 超大規模
    • 超大型
  • 層級類型
    • 一級和二級
    • 三級
    • 第四級
  • 依資料中心類型
    • 雲端服務供應商(CSP)
    • 企業級、模組化、邊緣運算
    • 搭配
      • 用過的
        • 託管類型
          • 零售
          • 批發的
          • 超大規模
        • 最終用戶
          • 雲端IT
          • 溝通
          • 媒體與娛樂
          • 政府
          • BFSI
          • 製造業
          • 電子商務
          • 其他

第6章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度
  • 策略趨勢
  • 市佔率分析(單位:兆瓦)
  • 公司簡介
    • Aligned Data Centers
    • Cogent Communications Holdings Inc.
    • Colohouse LLC
    • Colocrossing LLC
    • CoreSite Realty Corporation
    • CyrusOne LLC
    • Cyxtera Technologies Inc.
    • DataBank Holdings Ltd.
    • Digital Fortress Inc.
    • Digital Realty Trust Inc.
    • EdgeConneX Inc.
    • Equinix Inc.
    • Evoque Data Center Solutions LLC
    • Fifteen Forty-Seven Critical Systems Realty LLC
    • Hivelocity Ventures Corp.
    • Netrality Data Centers LLC
    • PhoenixNAP LLC
    • Quality Technology Services Holding LLC
    • Rackspace Technology Inc.
    • Stack Infrastructure Inc.
    • Stream Data Centers LP
    • T5 Data Centers LLC
    • TierPoint LLC
    • 365 Data Centers LLC

第7章 市場機會與未來展望

簡介目錄
Product Code: 5000219

According to Mordor Intelligence, the chicago data center market size is expected to grow from 1.9 GW in 2025 to 2.03 GW in 2026 and is forecast to reach 2.81 GW by 2031 at 6.73% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Chicago Data Center - Market - IMG1

This report is Segmented by Data Center Size (Small, Medium, Large, Massive, Mega), Tier Type (Tier 1&2, Tier 3, Tier 4), Data Center Type(Colocation, Cloud Service Providers (CSPs), Enterprise, Modular, and Edge). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Chicago Data Center Market Trends and Insights

Surging Cloud-Service-Provider Demand

Hyperscale operators are accelerating footprint expansion as premier coastal markets hit power ceilings. Amazon's USD 20 billion program for nuclear-backed campuses in the Mid-Atlantic signals a readiness to diversify locations, enabling Chicago to draw similar mega-projects. Microsoft and BlackRock's USD 30 billion AI-infrastructure alliance has earmarked Midwest parcels, while Equinix's USD 15 billion xScale venture identifies Chicago as an early launch point. Financial-market latency needs further amplify demand; CME Group's private Google Cloud region in Aurora exemplifies this enterprise pull.

Growing Enterprise Edge-Computing Needs

A USD 232 billion global edge-market in 2024 is reshaping site requirements for Chicago's manufacturers, retailers and financial firms. CoreSite's CH2 earned NVIDIA DGX-Ready status, reinforcing the metro's suitability for AI inference clusters. Telecommunications carriers such as Comcast anchor Northlake facilities to support 5G, content-delivery networks and low-latency over-the-top workloads.

Rising Power Costs (ComEd Territory)

Projected monthly customer bills could climb USD 10.50 as data-center demand raises grid-balancing charges. PJM auction-clearing prices have risen, forcing operators to hedge higher capacity costs. Lawmakers are studying safeguards to prevent hyperscale strain on legacy infrastructure and to protect ratepayers.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Robust Fiber-Connectivity Ecosystem
  2. Incentive Programs and Illinois Tax Benefits
  3. Escalating Land and Construction Costs

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Massive footprints delivered 44.12% share of Chicago data center market in 2025, reflecting a matured ecosystem supporting financial-services and legacy workloads. However, Mega campuses are set to outpace every other category at a 7.72% CAGR through 2031 as AI training clusters hunt for blocks of contiguous power above 100 MW. T5's 480 MW suburban campus and Compass' five-building redevelopment of the former Sears HQ evidence this pivot, each engineered for >= 50 kW per rack densities.

Small and medium halls remain viable for edge and enterprise hybrids but face gradual absorption into larger wholesale footprints. Hyperscale tenants favor the operating leverage and custom mechanical-electrical topologies available in Mega builds, pressuring owners of smaller suites to differentiate via latency-critical or specialty compliance offerings.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Data Center Size
    • Small
    • Medium
    • Large
    • Massive
    • Mega
  • By Tier Type
    • Tier 1 and 2
    • Tier 3
    • Tier 4
  • By Data Center Type
    • Cloud Service Providers (CSPs)
    • Enterprise, Modular and Edge
    • Colocation
      • Utilized
        • Colocation Type
          • Retail
          • Wholesale
          • Hyperscale
        • End User
          • Cloud and IT
          • Telecom
          • Media and Entertainment
          • Government
          • BFSI
          • Manufacturing
          • E-Commerce
          • Other End User

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  1. Aligned Data Centers
  2. Cogent Communications Holdings Inc.
  3. Colohouse LLC
  4. Colocrossing LLC
  5. CoreSite Realty Corporation
  6. CyrusOne LLC
  7. Cyxtera Technologies Inc.
  8. DataBank Holdings Ltd.
  9. Digital Fortress Inc.
  10. Digital Realty Trust Inc.
  11. EdgeConneX Inc.
  12. Equinix Inc.
  13. Evoque Data Center Solutions LLC
  14. Fifteen Forty-Seven Critical Systems Realty LLC
  15. Hivelocity Ventures Corp.
  16. Netrality Data Centers LLC
  17. PhoenixNAP LLC
  18. Quality Technology Services Holding LLC
  19. Rackspace Technology Inc.
  20. Stack Infrastructure Inc.
  21. Stream Data Centers LP
  22. T5 Data Centers LLC
  23. TierPoint LLC
  24. 365 Data Centers LLC

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Surging Cloud Service Provider Demand
    • 4.2.2 Growing Enterprise Edge Computing Needs
    • 4.2.3 Robust Fiber Connectivity Ecosystem
    • 4.2.4 Incentive Programs and Illinois Tax Benefits
    • 4.2.5 Northern Virginia Spill-over Capacity Demand
    • 4.2.6 AI Training Workloads Seeking Midwest Power
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Rising Power Costs (ComEd Territory)
    • 4.3.2 Escalating Land and Construction Costs
    • 4.3.3 Cooling Constraints from Lake Michigan Water Rules
    • 4.3.4 Lengthy Grid-Interconnection Permitting Cycles
  • 4.4 Value/Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Key Demand Indicators
    • 4.7.1 Smartphone Users
    • 4.7.2 Data Traffic per Smartphone
    • 4.7.3 Mobile Data Speed
    • 4.7.4 Broadband Data Speed
  • 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.9 Assessment of Macro Economic Trends on the Market

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (MW)

  • 5.1 By Data Center Size
    • 5.1.1 Small
    • 5.1.2 Medium
    • 5.1.3 Large
    • 5.1.4 Massive
    • 5.1.5 Mega
  • 5.2 By Tier Type
    • 5.2.1 Tier 1 and 2
    • 5.2.2 Tier 3
    • 5.2.3 Tier 4
  • 5.3 By Data Center Type
    • 5.3.1 Cloud Service Providers (CSPs)
    • 5.3.2 Enterprise, Modular and Edge
    • 5.3.3 Colocation
      • 5.3.3.1 Utilized
        • 5.3.3.1.1 Colocation Type
          • 5.3.3.1.1.1 Retail
          • 5.3.3.1.1.2 Wholesale
          • 5.3.3.1.1.3 Hyperscale
        • 5.3.3.1.2 End User
          • 5.3.3.1.2.1 Cloud and IT
          • 5.3.3.1.2.2 Telecom
          • 5.3.3.1.2.3 Media and Entertainment
          • 5.3.3.1.2.4 Government
          • 5.3.3.1.2.5 BFSI
          • 5.3.3.1.2.6 Manufacturing
          • 5.3.3.1.2.7 E-Commerce
          • 5.3.3.1.2.8 Other End User

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (In MW)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Aligned Data Centers
    • 6.4.2 Cogent Communications Holdings Inc.
    • 6.4.3 Colohouse LLC
    • 6.4.4 Colocrossing LLC
    • 6.4.5 CoreSite Realty Corporation
    • 6.4.6 CyrusOne LLC
    • 6.4.7 Cyxtera Technologies Inc.
    • 6.4.8 DataBank Holdings Ltd.
    • 6.4.9 Digital Fortress Inc.
    • 6.4.10 Digital Realty Trust Inc.
    • 6.4.11 EdgeConneX Inc.
    • 6.4.12 Equinix Inc.
    • 6.4.13 Evoque Data Center Solutions LLC
    • 6.4.14 Fifteen Forty-Seven Critical Systems Realty LLC
    • 6.4.15 Hivelocity Ventures Corp.
    • 6.4.16 Netrality Data Centers LLC
    • 6.4.17 PhoenixNAP LLC
    • 6.4.18 Quality Technology Services Holding LLC
    • 6.4.19 Rackspace Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.20 Stack Infrastructure Inc.
    • 6.4.21 Stream Data Centers LP
    • 6.4.22 T5 Data Centers LLC
    • 6.4.23 TierPoint LLC
    • 6.4.24 365 Data Centers LLC

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment