查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1927452

貨櫃航運服務市場按服務類型、貨櫃類型、運輸方式、航線類型和最終用戶產業分類－2026-2032年全球預測

Container Shipping Service Market by Service Type, Container Type, Shipping Mode, Route Type, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 185 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，貨櫃航運服務市場價值將達到 1,335.4 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 1,490.4 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 2975.5 億美元，年複合成長率為 12.12%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 1335.4億美元
預計年份：2026年 1490.4億美元
預測年份 2032 2975.5億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 12.12%

為產業領導者提供簡潔策略框架，闡述重塑貨櫃航運經濟、服務交付和決策的各種融合力量。

貨櫃航運生態系統正處於關鍵的轉折點，不斷變化的貿易政策、運輸創新和終端用戶需求正在重塑傳統的運輸模式。產業相關人員面臨傳統營運複雜性和新壓力的雙重挑戰，這需要更清晰的策略重點和更快的執行節奏。本執行摘要總結了影響承運商經濟效益、航線規劃和客戶期望的最重要因素，為領導者評估近期風險和中期結構性變化提供了切實可行的觀點。

多式聯運、數位化協調和不斷變化的客戶需求如何共同重塑貨櫃航運網路和競爭策略

貨櫃航運業正經歷著超越週期性運費波動的變革性變化；這些變化正在改變參與者之間的競爭與合作方式。多式聯運的日益融合，包括先進的鐵路和內河航運調度，使托運人和承運人能夠重組其網路，從而提高可靠性並降低總運輸成本。同時，數位化技術在視覺化平台、自動化碼頭營運和預測性維護等方面的應用，提高了資產利用率，同時也提升了供應鏈各環節服務透明度的期望。

評估2025年美國關稅及其對全球貨櫃物流採購、路線和商業結構的系統性影響

美國2025年實施的關稅政策，對海運成本和航線選擇產生了持續影響。其累積效應不僅體現在關稅直接推高到岸成本，也體現在對採購決策、庫存策略和運輸方式選擇的間接影響。擁有全球採購基地的托運人正在重新審視其供應商組合和近岸外包方案，以降低關稅風險並縮短前置作業時間。這也會影響特定貿易航線的貨櫃停留時間、調運需求和設備配置。

細分市場主導的營運和商業需求，例如服務模式、貨櫃類型、垂直產業需求、運輸方式組合和路線配置，將塑造產品組合策略。

細分市場揭示了不同服務類型和貨櫃配置的關鍵營運和商業挑戰，這對於制定有針對性的策略至關重要。按服務類型分類，整箱貨運 (FCL) 業務滿足托運人大批量貨運需求，因此需要優先考慮艙位可靠性、端到端可視性和合約穩定性。同時，拼箱貨運 (LCL) 服務需要高效的貨櫃中心、動態定價能力和嚴格的庫存同步，才能創造利潤並滿足電子商務和分散式零售的需求。

美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的區域特徵和基礎設施現狀將影響航運路線規劃、運輸方式選擇和韌性策略。

區域趨勢持續驅動著全球主要地區不同的優先事項和相互競爭的行為。在美洲，需求模式強調區域內互聯互通以及與北美製造地的貿易流量，尤其注重平衡港口吞吐能力、卡車底盤可用性和內陸多式聯運，以最大限度地減少滯期時間和滯期費。北美托運人越來越關注運輸韌性和國內運力，這正在影響服務頻率和支線網路的配置。

承運商、貨運代理、租賃公司、碼頭營運商和技術提供者如何協調投資，以確保網路可靠性、客戶差異化和可擴展成長

主要企業之間的競爭動態凸顯了規模化、網路最佳化以及透過整合服務實現差異化服務的重點。全球班輪運輸公司繼續優先考慮船隊運轉率和聯盟管理，以確保按時交付，同時尋求提高碼頭和內陸運輸的營運效率。無船通用(NVOCC) 和貨運代理商正在投資數位化平台和客戶體驗，以吸引那些尋求透明度和靈活合約條款的托運人的貨運量。貨櫃租賃公司和租賃平台正在最佳化其資產組合，使其與貨櫃的生命週期和維護情況相匹配，以滿足不斷變化的需求。

經營團隊可採取切實可行的策略步驟，以增強貨運價格的抗風險能力，最佳化運輸方式組合，並使車隊和數位化投資與客戶垂直行業的需求保持一致。

產業領導者應採取一系列切實可行的措施，以平衡短期韌性和長期競爭力。首先，將運費情境規劃納入商業合約和採購流程，以便在不造成過大成本衝擊的情況下快速調整供應鏈。企業應將情境分析與風險共用、服務連續性的合約機制結合，以便在維護客戶關係的同時保障利潤。其次，應加快多式聯運合作和內陸運輸能力的重點投資，以便在海運航線面臨關稅或堵塞等不利因素時，高效地進行運輸方式替代。

報告採用嚴謹的混合方法研究途徑，結合了相關人員訪談、情境檢驗和交叉檢驗的二手分析，以確保得出可操作且可靠的結論。

本報告的調查方法結合了定性專家訪談、與關鍵相關人員的定向對話以及廣泛的二手資料，以確保提供可靠的實用見解。主要研究包括與商業領袖、營運經理、碼頭專家和物流工程師進行結構化討論，以收集關於服務設計、運力利用和貨運響應策略的實際觀點。此外，還開展了情境研討會，在實際營運約束條件下對路線重新配置和運輸方式轉換進行壓力測試。

最後總結了政策、交通運輸進步和客戶特定特徵如何融合，從而重新定義韌性、差異化和卓越營運的優先事項。

總之，貨櫃航運正經歷著一場多方面的變革，其驅動力包括政策調整、運輸創新以及不斷變化的客戶期望。這些因素正在重塑整個價值鏈的運力分配、服務定價和合約結構。能夠積極整合運費情​​境規劃、投資多式聯運和數位化能力並提供滿足產業需求的客製化服務的領導企業，將增強自身的韌性並獲得差異化價值。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席體驗長觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 依服務類型分類的貨櫃航運服務市場

  • 整箱裝載
  • 部分載入

9. 依貨櫃類型分類的貨櫃運輸服務市場

  • 乾貨容器
    • 20英尺貨櫃
    • 40英尺貨櫃
    • 45英尺貨櫃
  • 平板式貨櫃
  • 敞頂容器
  • 冷藏貨櫃
  • 槽式貨櫃

10. 依運輸方式分類的貨櫃航運服務市場

  • 多式聯運
    • 內河航道
    • 鐵路運輸
    • 卡車運輸
  • 海上運輸

11. 依航線類型分類的貨櫃航運服務市場

  • 直飛
  • 接力運輸

12. 依最終用戶產業分類的貨櫃運輸服務市場

  • 車
  • 食品/飲料
  • 製藥
  • 零售

13. 各區域貨櫃航運服務市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章 貨櫃航運服務市場（依組別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

15. 各國貨櫃航運服務市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章：美國貨櫃航運服務市場

第17章：中國貨櫃航運服務市場

第18章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • AP Moller-Maersk A/S
  • CMA CGM SA
  • COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • Evergreen Marine Corporation（Taiwan）Ltd.
  • Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • HMM Co., Ltd.
  • Korea Marine Transport Co., Ltd.
  • Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
  • Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-4F7A6D4FF51D

The Container Shipping Service Market was valued at USD 133.54 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 149.04 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 12.12%, reaching USD 297.55 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 133.54 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 149.04 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 297.55 billion
CAGR (%) 12.12%

A concise strategic framing of converging forces reshaping container shipping economics, service delivery, and decision-making for industry leaders

The container shipping ecosystem stands at a pivotal juncture defined by evolving trade policies, modal innovation, and end-user demand reshaping traditional flows. Industry participants are navigating a blend of legacy operational complexity and emergent pressures that require clearer strategic priorities and faster execution rhythms. This executive summary synthesizes the most consequential forces influencing carrier economics, routing logic, and customer expectations, presenting a pragmatic lens for leaders to assess near-term risks and medium-term structural shifts.

This introduction frames the analysis by outlining the primary axes of change that inform the subsequent sections: regulatory and tariff movements that alter landed cost and route choices; technological and modal advances that affect service reliability and network configuration; and demand-side trends from key verticals including automotive, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and retail that dictate equipment utilization and scheduling. By establishing this context, the report equips readers with a common understanding of what is driving cost, service differentiation, and capital allocation across the industry.

Moving forward, executives should view the insights here as a diagnostic toolkit rather than prescriptive instruction. The goal is to enable rapid hypothesis testing within procurement, operations, and commercial teams so that strategy can be refined iteratively as policy and market conditions continue to evolve.

How intermodal integration, digital orchestration, and evolving customer requirements are jointly remapping container shipping networks and competitive strategies

The landscape for container shipping is experiencing transformative shifts that extend beyond cyclical freight rate movements, and these shifts are altering how participants compete and collaborate. Advances in intermodal integration, including more sophisticated rail and inland-waterway scheduling, are enabling shippers and carriers to reconfigure networks for improved reliability and lower total transport costs. Simultaneously, digital adoption across visibility platforms, automated terminal operations, and predictive maintenance is increasing asset productivity while raising expectations for service transparency across the supply chain.

Regulatory and policy shifts are further accelerating change by incentivizing modal substitution and by prompting carriers to revisit deployment strategies for specialized equipment such as refrigerated and tank containers. Demand polarization among end-use industries-where automotive and pharmaceuticals prioritize speed and traceability while retail and food and beverage balance cost and frequency-creates opportunities for differentiated service products, including premium guaranteed-time services and spot-responsive less-than-container-load solutions. These dynamics are prompting a re-evaluation of long-held assumptions about hub-and-spoke design, slot allocation, and partnership structures.

Consequently, successful organizations are those that adopt an adaptive strategy combining flexible asset management, targeted investments in digital orchestration, and closer commercial alignment with customers to co-design service offerings that reflect sector-specific needs. This combination positions them to capture value as supply chains evolve toward greater complexity and resilience.

Assessment of the 2025 United States tariff actions and their systemic effects on sourcing, routing, and commercial structures across global container logistics

Tariff actions originating from the United States in 2025 introduced a set of persistent cost and routing considerations that reverberate across oceanborne logistics. The cumulative impact is felt not only through direct tariff additions to landed cost but also via second-order effects on sourcing decisions, inventory strategies, and modal selection. Shippers with global sourcing footprints are reassessing supplier portfolios and nearshoring options to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten lead times, which in turn influences container dwelling, repositioning needs, and equipment mix on specific trade lanes.

Moreover, carriers and freight forwarders are responding by adjusting service frequencies, redeploying capacity, and in some cases re-routing to avoid tariff-affected transshipment points. These operational adjustments create pockets of congestion and capacity imbalances that can amplify variability in transit times and demurrage exposure. The tariff environment also incentivizes more sophisticated commercial clauses and risk-sharing mechanisms between shippers and carriers, including surcharges, contract re-negotiations, and enhanced data transparency for landed-cost reconciliation.

In aggregate, the tariffs are accelerating a broader shift toward supply chain resiliency practices: multi-sourcing, safety-stock recalibration, and stronger collaboration across logistics partners. Leaders who proactively model tariff scenarios and embed flexible contractual terms are better positioned to secure continuity while preserving margins and service levels in a more volatile policy landscape.

Segment-driven operational and commercial imperatives across service models, container types, vertical needs, modal mixes, and route configurations that inform portfolio strategy

Segmentation reveals distinct operational and commercial imperatives across service types and container configurations that are essential for targeted strategy development. Based on service type, Full Container Load operations require emphasis on slot reliability, end-to-end visibility, and contractual stability to support large-volume shippers, while Less Than Container Load offerings demand highly efficient consolidation hubs, dynamic pricing capability, and tight inventory synchronization to unlock margins and serve e-commerce and fragmented retail demand.

Examining container type shows that dry containers remain the backbone of general cargo flows and their common 20-foot, 40-foot, and 45-foot variants drive decisions about payload optimization and terminal handling practices. Specialized equipment such as flat rack, open top, refrigerated, and tank containers complicates fleet planning because each type has unique maintenance profiles, seasonal demand patterns, and stowage constraints. These differences necessitate differentiated commercial propositions and targeted fleet leasing or ownership strategies to avoid idle assets and to respond rapidly to end-user requirements.

End-use industry segmentation-including automotive, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and retail-underscores how vertical-specific needs shape service design: automotive favors scheduled, high-cadence services with tight quality controls; food and beverage and pharmaceuticals prioritize temperature control and traceability; while retail seeks flexibility and frequency to support promotional cycles. Shipping mode segmentation distinguishes between intermodal and sea freight; within intermodal the mix of inland waterways, rail transport, and truck transport affects lead-time variability and cost structures, requiring nuanced orchestration across terminals and hinterland partners. Finally, route type segmentation differentiates direct services from transshipment-based itineraries, where direct routes offer lead-time certainty and transshipment routes provide network reach at the cost of potential schedule risk. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables firms to tailor product portfolios, price architecture, and operating models to specific customer segments and trade lane characteristics.

Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape route planning, modal choice, and resilience strategies

Regional dynamics continue to drive divergent priorities and competitive behaviors across the main global geographies. In the Americas, demand patterns emphasize intra-regional connectivity and trade flows to and from North American manufacturing hubs, with particular focus on balancing port capacity, truck chassis availability, and inland intermodal connections to minimize dwell and demurrage costs. North American shippers are increasingly focused on resilience and onshore capacity, which influences service frequency and the configuration of feeder networks.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex overlay of regulatory regimes, hinterland intermodal maturity, and diverse consumption profiles. European demand favors sustainability and modal shift initiatives that support rail and short-sea corridors, while ports in the Middle East are developing transshipment and value-added logistics capabilities to capture east-west flows. Africa's growing gateway investments and regional trade agreements are beginning to alter traditional routing choices, though infrastructure and regulatory heterogeneity continue to pose operational challenges and opportunities for early movers.

Asia-Pacific remains the principal source of manufactured exports and is characterized by dense port clusters, integrated manufacturing ecosystems, and varied regulatory approaches among economies. This region's container mix skews toward high-volume dry container usage, with strong seasonal peaks influenced by retail and consumer electronics cycles. Interdependencies among Asia-Pacific production centers and global consumption markets mean that disruptions within this region rapidly propagate across networks, underscoring the importance of diversified routing and capacity contingency planning.

How carriers, forwarders, lessors, terminal operators, and technology providers are aligning investments to secure network reliability, customer differentiation, and scalable growth

Competitive dynamics among key companies reveal a focus on scale, network optimization, and service differentiation through integrated offerings. Global liner carriers continue to prioritize fleet utilization and alliance management to preserve schedule integrity while exploring operational efficiencies at terminals and in hinterland drayage. Non-vessel operating common carriers and freight forwarders are investing in digital platforms and customer experience to capture volume from shippers seeking greater transparency and flexible contract terms. Container lessors and leasing platforms are optimizing portfolios to match lifecycle and maintenance profiles with demand volatility.

Port operators and terminal service providers are accelerating automation and capacity expansion to reduce berth congestion and improve turnaround times; meanwhile, technology vendors are scaling modular solutions for track-and-trace, capacity forecasting, and revenue management to support commercial teams. Strategic partnerships-ranging from slot exchanges to joint-venture feeder agreements-are becoming more common as firms seek to manage route coverage without incurring disproportionate capital expense. Additionally, companies with integrated cold chain capabilities and certified handling for pharmaceuticals are differentiating by offering end-to-end temperature-assured transport solutions that command premium pricing and deeper customer lock-in.

These company-level trends point to an industry where operational excellence, customer-centric digital services, and flexible commercial frameworks determine which players expand footprint and which ones become targets for consolidation or partnership.

Practical strategic moves for executives to strengthen tariff resilience, optimize modal mixes, and align fleet and digital investments with vertical customer demands

Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable moves that balance short-term resilience with long-term competitiveness. First, integrate tariff scenario planning into commercial contracting and procurement cycles so that supply chains can be rapidly rebalanced without undue cost shock. Firms should pair scenario analysis with contractual mechanisms that share risk and maintain service continuity, thereby protecting margins while preserving customer relationships. Second, accelerate targeted investments in intermodal orchestration and hinterland capacity so that modal substitution can be executed efficiently when oceanborne routes face tariff or congestion headwinds.

Third, align fleet composition and leasing strategies to match vertical demand characteristics and seasonalities; for instance, prioritize refrigerated and specialized equipment availability for temperature-sensitive industries while optimizing dry container sizing for retail and bulk manufacturing. Fourth, invest in digital visibility and predictive analytics to reduce dwell, improve asset turns, and enable dynamic pricing and capacity allocation. Finally, cultivate strategic partnerships across the value chain-including terminals, rail operators, and service aggregators-to build resilient routing options and to capture value through coordinated service bundles. Taken together, these actions position organizations to respond nimbly to policy shifts, customer demands, and operational disruptions while preserving service quality and financial discipline.

A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, scenario testing, and cross-validated secondary analysis to ensure actionable and reliable insights

The research methodology underpinning this report combines qualitative expert interviews, targeted primary stakeholder engagement, and extensive secondary source synthesis to ensure robust and actionable findings. Primary research included structured discussions with commercial leaders, operations managers, terminal specialists, and logistics technologists to capture on-the-ground perspectives about service design, equipment utilization, and tariff response strategies. These engagements were complemented by scenario workshops that stress-tested route reconfigurations and modal substitution under realistic operational constraints.

Secondary research entailed a disciplined review of regulatory notices, trade policy developments, carrier and terminal announcements, and academic and industry publications to build a factual baseline. Data triangulation methods were applied to cross-validate insights from different sources and to reconcile discrepancies in operational reporting. Segmentation frameworks were constructed by mapping service types, container categories, end-use verticals, shipping modes, and route configurations to observed behaviors and decision criteria. Finally, findings were synthesized into practical recommendations and scenario-based implications for commercial and operational stakeholders, ensuring that the conclusions are both evidence-based and implementation-focused.

Final synthesis of how policy, modal advances, and customer specificity converge to redefine priorities for resilience, differentiation, and operational excellence

In conclusion, container shipping is undergoing a multi-dimensional transformation driven by policy shifts, modal innovation, and evolving customer expectations. These forces are reshaping how capacity is allocated, how services are priced, and how contracts are structured across the value chain. Leaders who proactively integrate tariff scenario planning, invest in intermodal and digital capabilities, and tailor offerings to vertical-specific needs will enhance resilience and capture differentiated value.

Operational agility, underpinned by improved visibility and strategic partnerships, will be the defining capability for companies seeking to navigate uncertainty without sacrificing service levels. As the industry adapts, the interplay between regulatory developments and commercial response will continue to create both risk and opportunity. Decision-makers should therefore prioritize flexible execution plans, targeted capital deployment, and closer collaboration with customers and partners so that short-term volatility is managed while medium-term growth and efficiency objectives are advanced.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Container Shipping Service Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Full Container Load
  • 8.2. Less Than Container Load

9. Container Shipping Service Market, by Container Type

  • 9.1. Dry Container
    • 9.1.1. 20-Foot Container
    • 9.1.2. 40-Foot Container
    • 9.1.3. 45-Foot Container
  • 9.2. Flat Rack Container
  • 9.3. Open Top Container
  • 9.4. Refrigerated Container
  • 9.5. Tank Container

10. Container Shipping Service Market, by Shipping Mode

  • 10.1. Intermodal
    • 10.1.1. Inland Waterways
    • 10.1.2. Rail Transport
    • 10.1.3. Truck Transport
  • 10.2. Sea Freight

11. Container Shipping Service Market, by Route Type

  • 11.1. Direct
  • 11.2. Transshipment

12. Container Shipping Service Market, by End-Use Industry

  • 12.1. Automotive
  • 12.2. Food & Beverage
  • 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
  • 12.4. Retail

13. Container Shipping Service Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Container Shipping Service Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Container Shipping Service Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Container Shipping Service Market

17. China Container Shipping Service Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S
  • 18.6. CMA CGM S.A.
  • 18.7. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 18.8. Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan) Ltd.
  • 18.9. Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • 18.10. HMM Co., Ltd.
  • 18.11. Korea Marine Transport Co., Ltd.
  • 18.12. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
  • 18.13. Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • 18.14. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • 18.15. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)