查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1918487

按服務類型、貨櫃類型、貨櫃尺寸和最終用戶產業分類的貨櫃航運市場－2026-2032年全球預測

Container Shipping Market by Service Type (Liner Service, Tramp Service), Container Type (Dry Container, Flat Rack, Reefer Container), Container Size, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 187 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，貨櫃航運市場價值將達到 3.6863 億美元，到 2026 年將成長到 4.0165 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 6.3748 億美元，年複合成長率為 8.13%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 3.6863億美元
預計年份：2026年 4.0165億美元
預測年份 2032 6.3748億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 8.13%

本文簡要概述了影響現代國際貿易中相關人員決策的貨櫃運輸趨勢、營運壓力和戰略重點。

儘管貨櫃運輸仍然是全球貿易的基石，但其營運環境正從可預測的航線週期轉變為受複雜監管趨勢、基礎設施限制和需求波動影響的局面。托運人和航運公司面臨許多挑戰，例如投入成本波動、港口擁塞和加速脫碳等，這些挑戰正在重塑商業優先事項和資本配置。在此背景下，經營團隊的關注正從單一的效率提升轉向在合約、網路和資產管理等方面實現多維度的韌性。

分析技術、地緣政治和營運因素的融合如何重塑全球貨櫃航運的競爭格局

貨櫃航運業正經歷著變革性的轉變，這些轉變影響著定價、服務設計和資本配置。數位化提高了可視性，並實現了預測性決策；同時，碼頭自動化和內河數位化程度的提高正在縮短船舶停留時間，並加快週轉速度。這些營運方面的改善也得到了船隊層級相應調整的配合。船東正選擇性地投資和改造更節能的船舶，以滿足監管部門的排放目標；同時，聯盟和艙位共用協議也在不斷發展，以滿足網路最佳化的需求。

重點檢驗近期美國關稅措施如何對全球貨櫃航運產生多層次的營運波動和戰略應對措施。

美國近期加徵的關稅為承運商、托運人和物流供應商帶來了新的複雜性，加劇了成本轉嫁的考量，並促使他們調整戰術性路線和採購策略。關稅的實施會即時發出價格訊號，從而改變貿易流量，促使企業評估替代貨源和路線，以降低增加的到岸成本並維持利潤率。因此，運費和合約談判都受到關稅相關風險溢價的影響，使得合約中關於關稅和監管風險分擔的條款顯得尤為重要。

詳細的細分資訊展示了服務模式、容器類型和尺寸以及特定產業要求如何共同決定營運選擇和商業性成果。

班輪運輸和不定期貨運服務模式的差異凸顯了二者截然不同的商業性邏輯。班輪業者強調定期可靠的服務、頻繁的航次以及以合約為導向的客戶關係，而不定期貨運服務則保持客製化、航次導向，並專注於不定期貨運或計劃貨物。這種差異影響資產利用模式、艙位可用性和合約簽訂方式：班輪業者優先考慮網路密度和載貨率最佳化，而不定期貨運業者則強調針對特定貨物的柔軟性以及對租船市場的應對力。在這兩種服務模式之間轉換需要仔細評估固定成本和可變成本的風險，以及貨物合約的性質。

區域比較分析突顯了特定走廊的基礎設施管治和需求趨勢如何塑造全球貿易叢集的競爭優勢。

在美洲，眾多成熟的門戶樞紐和不斷擴展的內陸多式聯運走廊正在推動運輸方式組合和短途運輸趨勢的變化，港口擴建和腹地互聯互通投資也正在改變著航運方式組合和短途運輸的趨勢。北美托運人越來越重視可預測性和可視性，從而推動了對班輪運輸和綜合物流服務的需求，這些服務可以縮短貨物停留時間並加快清關速度。拉丁美洲貿易走廊的基礎設施發展不平衡，這影響了承運商的班次安排、轉運依賴性和設備回收模式。

整合企業策略、技術投資和夥伴關係模式，重新定義貨櫃航運的運能分配和服務差異化

領先的營運商和設備供應商正在尋求差異化策略，以平衡規模、服務品質和合規性。機隊部署決策體現了對燃油效率和運力提升的重視，而夥伴關係和聯盟協議則持續影響關鍵航線的可用航班時刻和服務頻率。投資重點包括提供端到端視覺性、預測性維護功能以及增強型客戶服務入口網站的數位化平台，這些平台能夠實現自動化異常管理和效能分析。

針對性強、切實可行的建議，幫助經營團隊增強韌性、最佳化商業環境並加速航運價值鏈的營運現代化。

高階主管應優先考慮能夠提升整個供應鏈透明度的投資，包括基於感測器的設備、統一的數據標準以及能夠實現主動應對的預測分析。透過靈活的合約條款、應對監管變化的指數化條款以及協作式風險分擔機制來增強合約柔軟性，將有助於減輕關稅和燃油價格波動帶來的商業性影響。經營團隊還應評估分級車隊和設備策略，將專用資產分配給高收益或時效性貨物，同時保持足夠的貨櫃基礎以應對日常運輸。

對調查方法、數據三角測量和檢驗程序進行清晰的解釋，以便為決策者提供可靠、可操作的見解。

我們的研究途徑整合了對關鍵相關人員的訪談、營運績效數據以及公開的監管和貿易文件，從而建構出一個連貫的分析整體情況。我們將從承運人、碼頭和托運人訪談中獲得的定性資訊與營運指標（例如時間表可靠性、港口吞吐量趨勢以及設備運作週期觀察）進行匹配。分析架構著重於情境分析、政策衝擊敏感度測試以及能力映射，以評估各類資產與顧客需求的匹配程度。

簡明扼要地總結了經營團隊的策略重點和為因應航運業政策、技術和營運變化而採取的協調行動。

貨櫃航運業正受到多種因素的共同影響而重塑：政策轉變、技術應用、基礎設施限制以及不斷變化的客戶期望。成功的企業將能夠把高精度視覺性融入商業性決策，使資產策略與差異化服務需求相匹配，並將情境規劃制度化以應對政策波動。對自動化和電氣化的營運投資必須與確保服務可靠性的合約和網路層面的努力相平衡。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席體驗長觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 按服務類型分類的貨櫃航運市場

  • 班輪服務
  • 不定期貨運服務

9. 依貨櫃類型分類的貨櫃航運市場

  • 乾貨容器
  • 平板架
  • 冷藏貨櫃
  • 槽式貨櫃

第10章 以貨櫃尺寸分類的貨櫃航運市場

  • 45英尺
  • 40英尺
  • 20英尺

第11章 依終端用戶產業分類的貨櫃航運市場

  • 車
  • 化學品
  • 電子設備
  • 食品/飲料
    • 不易生鮮產品
    • 生鮮產品
  • 製藥
    • 腫瘤學
    • 疫苗
  • 零售

第12章 各區域貨櫃航運市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 貨櫃航運市場（依集團分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第14章 各國貨櫃航運市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第15章：美國貨櫃航運市場

第16章 中國貨櫃航運市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • AP Moller-Maersk A/S
  • CMA CGM SA
  • COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
  • Evergreen Marine Corporation, Ltd.
  • Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • HMM Co., Ltd.
  • Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
  • Matson, Inc.
  • Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
  • Nippon Yusen Kaisha
  • Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • Pacific International Lines Pte Ltd.
  • SITC International Holdings Company Ltd.
  • SM Line Corporation
  • Wan Hai Lines Ltd.
  • X-Press Feeders Ltd.
  • Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB15585

The Container Shipping Market was valued at USD 368.63 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 401.65 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.13%, reaching USD 637.48 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 368.63 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 401.65 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 637.48 million
CAGR (%) 8.13%

A concise orientation to container shipping dynamics operational pressures and strategic priorities shaping stakeholder decisions in modern global trade

Container shipping remains a backbone of global trade, but the operational environment has evolved from predictable lane rotations to one characterized by complex regulatory dynamics, infrastructure constraints, and demand volatility. Shippers and carriers are grappling with shifting input costs, port congestions, and an accelerated push for decarbonization, all of which are reshaping commercial priorities and capital allocation. Against this backdrop, executive attention has migrated from singular efficiency gains to multi-dimensional resilience across the contracting, network, and asset-management horizons.

Strategic decision-makers must therefore reconcile short-term disruption management with longer-term transformations driven by policy, technology, and customer expectations. This requires integrating supply chain intelligence into route planning, aligning commercial incentives with capacity flexibility, and embedding sustainability targets into procurement and fleet modernization. By adopting a structured diagnostic approach-assessing service reliability, asset suitability, and regulatory exposures-organizations can prioritize interventions that protect margins while positioning for durable competitive advantage.

An analysis of the converging technological geopolitical and operational forces that are reshaping competitive positioning across global container shipping

The landscape of container shipping is undergoing transformative shifts that influence pricing formation, service design, and capital deployment. Digitalization is enhancing visibility and enabling predictive decision-making, while automation at terminals and increased hinterland digitization reduce dwell times and accelerate turnaround. These operational improvements are being complemented by fleet-level responses: owners are investing selectively in energy-efficient tonnage and retrofits to meet regulatory emissions trajectories, while alliances and slot-sharing arrangements are evolving in response to network optimization imperatives.

Concurrently, geopolitical tensions and trade policy unpredictability have incentivized the reconfiguration of supply chains towards nearshoring and regionalization for certain commodity groups. Shippers are balancing cost considerations with service reliability and lead-time certainty, prompting more nuanced sourcing strategies. Technology adoption-ranging from blockchain-enabled documentation to advanced ETAs powered by machine learning-enables better coordination among stakeholders but also raises questions of interoperability and standardization. These intersecting shifts are producing a more layered competitive environment in which agility, data integration, and targeted capital investment determine who captures value.

A focused evaluation of how recent United States tariff actions create multi-layered operational ripples and strategic responses across global container flows

Recent tariff actions originating from the United States have introduced an added layer of complexity for carriers, shippers, and logisticians, amplifying cost pass-through considerations and prompting tactical route and sourcing adjustments. Tariff impositions create immediate price signals that can alter trade flows, incentivizing firms to evaluate alternative sourcing or routing to mitigate landed-cost increases and preserve margin. Freight rates and contract negotiations are therefore being influenced by tariff-related risk premiums and an increased emphasis on contractual clauses that allocate duties and regulatory risks between parties.

Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs influence inventory policies and transit time trade-offs. Companies facing higher import costs may shift inventory strategies-preferring higher safety stocks or redesigning replenishment cadences-which in turn affects container dwell and equipment requirements. Carriers must respond to such demand elasticity changes by reallocating capacity, adjusting service frequencies, and calibrating blank sailings in corridors experiencing demand softening. Importantly, tariffs can accelerate structural shifts toward regional sourcing hubs, thereby creating longer-term rebalancing of trade lanes and potential implications for fleet deployment and port investment strategies.

Regulatory uncertainty tied to tariff policy also elevates the value of scenario planning and contractual flexibility. Stakeholders that invest in granular trade lane analysis, duty mitigation strategies, and tariff hedging mechanisms are better positioned to contend with episodic policy shocks. As tariffs interact with other cost pressures-fuel, labor, and regulatory compliance-the combined effect may reshape carrier network economics and cargo owner decisions, reinforcing the necessity for integrated commercial and operational planning.

Detailed segmentation intelligence showing how service models container types sizes and industry-specific requirements collectively determine operational choices and commercial outcomes

Service type differentiation between Liner Service and Tramp Service highlights contrasting commercial logics: liner operators emphasize scheduled reliability, frequent sailings, and contract-heavy customer relationships, whereas tramp services remain tailored, voyage-based, and oriented toward irregular or projectized cargoes. This dichotomy influences asset utilization patterns, slot availability, and contracting approaches, with liners prioritizing network density and load factor optimization while tramp operators focus on cargo-specific flexibility and charter market responsiveness. Transitioning between these service paradigms requires careful assessment of fixed versus variable cost exposures and the nature of cargo commitments.

Container type choices-Dry Container, Flat Rack, Reefer Container, and Tank Container-drive both operational handling and value capture. Dry containers dominate homogenized cargo flows and benefit from broad interchangeability, while flat racks and tank containers cater to specialized project and liquid bulk requirements that often command premium handling and niche service arrangements. Reefers are increasingly critical for perishable supply chains, and their electrification and telemetry integration are reshaping cold chain economics and contracting terms. Decisions about container type therefore reflect trade-off calculations between versatility and specialized revenue streams.

Container size considerations-Forty Five Foot, Forty Foot, and Twenty Foot-impact cargo density, yard management, and container equipment cycles. Larger sizes can reduce unit costs per cargo volume but may face operational constraints at legacy terminals or on certain hinterland transport modes, necessitating compatibility assessments. Conversely, smaller units provide flexibility for fragmented cargo but can increase handling intensity and equipment turnover. End-user industry profiles including Automotive, Chemicals, Electronics, Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, and Retail further modulate container and service choices. Within Food & Beverages, the non-perishables versus perishables split imposes distinct lead-time and cold-chain requirements, while Pharmaceuticals subdivided into Oncology and Vaccines demand stringent temperature control, traceability, and often expedited logistics paths. These industry-specific imperatives influence negotiation levers, preferred carrier partners, and investments in specialized assets and data integrations. Synthesizing these segmentation layers enables executives to prioritize capacity allocation, design differentiated service offerings, and tailor commercial terms that reflect the risk, handling complexity, and reliability expectations of each customer cohort.

Comparative regional analysis highlighting corridor-specific infrastructure governance and demand behaviors shaping competitive advantage across global trade clusters

The Americas exhibit a diverse mix of mature gateway hubs and expanding inland intermodal corridors, where investment in port expansion and hinterland connectivity is altering modal splits and drayage dynamics. North American shippers increasingly emphasize predictability and visibility, driving demand for scheduled liner services and integrated logistics offerings that reduce dwell and expedite customs clearance. Latin American trade corridors are experiencing uneven infrastructure upgrades, which affects carrier scheduling, transshipment reliance, and equipment recycling patterns.

Europe, the Middle East & Africa presents a multifaceted landscape where dense intra-regional trade and advanced terminal automation coexist with stretched capacities at key transshipment nodes. Regulatory frameworks and environmental mandates within this region are accelerating fleet modernization and incentivizing modal shifts to rail for certain corridors. Investment in port electrification and alternative fuels is gaining precedence, and carriers operating here must reconcile stringent compliance drivers with customer expectations for service reliability.

Asia-Pacific remains the epicenter of container throughput and structural manufacturing links, where high-frequency services, expansive transshipment hubs, and integrated logistics ecosystems define competitive norms. Rapid digital adoption and port productivity improvements are enabling tighter schedule integrity, yet capacity cyclicality and evolving labor negotiations can generate episodic disruptions. Across this region, nearshoring within Asia and diversification of sourcing hubs are influencing lane-level demand patterns, prompting carriers and shippers to refine their network strategies and partnerships.

A synthesis of corporate strategies technological investments and partnership models that are redefining capacity distribution and service differentiation in container shipping

Major operators and equipment providers are pursuing differentiated strategies to balance scale, service quality, and regulatory compliance. Fleet deployment decisions reflect an emphasis on fuel efficiency and tiered capacity offerings, while partnerships and alliance arrangements continue to shape available slots and service frequency on core tradelanes. Investment priorities include digital platforms for end-to-end visibility, predictive maintenance capabilities, and enhancements to customer servicing portals that enable automated exception management and performance analytics.

Equipment manufacturers and lessors are responding to demand for specialized containers and telematics-enabled assets, offering flexible leasing models and retrofit programs to support rapid adaptation to cargo-specific needs. Terminal operators and ports are leveraging automation, electrification, and advanced yard management systems to compress dwell times and increase throughput. Collectively, these company-level initiatives are accelerating the operational transition toward leaner, data-driven networks where collaboration across the value chain defines who can offer the most reliable and cost-efficient end-to-end solutions.

Targeted and actionable recommendations for executives to fortify resilience optimize commercial terms and accelerate operational modernization across the shipping value chain

Senior leaders should prioritize investments that increase visibility across the supply chain, such as sensor-enabled equipment, harmonized data standards, and predictive analytics that allow for proactive exception handling. Strengthening contractual agility through flexible terms, indexed clauses for regulatory changes, and collaborative risk-sharing mechanisms can reduce the commercial impact of tariff or fuel volatility. Executives should also assess a tiered fleet and equipment strategy that aligns specialized assets with high-margin or time-sensitive cargo while maintaining a base of interchangeable containers for routine flows.

Operationally, bolstering hinterland integration and partnering with reliable drayage and inland carriers mitigates terminal congestion risks and shortens lead times. Embracing partnerships with technology providers to pilot automation and alternative-fuel demonstrations can accelerate compliance with emissions targets while signaling market leadership. Finally, scenario-based planning that combines tariff, capacity, and demand variables will enable faster strategic pivots; instituting cross-functional war-rooms or decision forums ensures that commercial, operations, and procurement teams translate intelligence into coherent execution plans.

A clear exposition of the research approach data triangulation and validation steps used to produce reliable actionable insights for decision-makers

The research approach synthesizes primary stakeholder interviews, operational performance data, and publicly available regulatory and trade documentation to form a coherent analytical picture. Qualitative inputs from carrier, terminal, and shipper interviews are triangulated with operational indicators such as schedule reliability, port throughput trends, and equipment cycle observations. Analytical frameworks focus on scenario analysis, sensitivity testing around policy shocks, and capability-mapping to assess alignment between asset classes and customer requirements.

Validation protocols include cross-referencing interview-derived assertions with third-party logistics reports, industry operating metrics, and observed vessel and container movement patterns. Where possible, findings are stress-tested against alternate scenarios to evaluate robustness. This methodology ensures the insights are both practically actionable for decision-makers and grounded in observable operational behaviors across the value chain.

A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives and coordinated actions executives must prioritize to navigate policy technological and operational changes in shipping

The container shipping landscape is being reshaped by intertwined forces: policy shifts, technology adoption, infrastructure constraints, and changing customer expectations. Successful organizations will be those that integrate high-fidelity visibility into commercial decision-making, align asset strategies with differentiated service needs, and institutionalize scenario planning to navigate policy volatility. Operational investments in automation and electrification should be balanced with contractual and network-level initiatives that preserve service reliability.

In sum, the imperative is to move beyond siloed responses toward coordinated strategies that link procurement, operations, and sales under shared KPIs. By doing so, organizations can better absorb episodic shocks, capture structural advantages from technology and regulatory adaptation, and position themselves to serve evolving cargo-owner needs with resilience and efficiency.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Container Shipping Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Liner Service
  • 8.2. Tramp Service

9. Container Shipping Market, by Container Type

  • 9.1. Dry Container
  • 9.2. Flat Rack
  • 9.3. Reefer Container
  • 9.4. Tank Container

10. Container Shipping Market, by Container Size

  • 10.1. Forty Five Foot
  • 10.2. Forty Foot
  • 10.3. Twenty Foot

11. Container Shipping Market, by End User Industry

  • 11.1. Automotive
  • 11.2. Chemicals
  • 11.3. Electronics
  • 11.4. Food & Beverages
    • 11.4.1. Non Perishables
    • 11.4.2. Perishables
  • 11.5. Pharmaceuticals
    • 11.5.1. Oncology
    • 11.5.2. Vaccines
  • 11.6. Retail

12. Container Shipping Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Container Shipping Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Container Shipping Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Container Shipping Market

16. China Container Shipping Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S
  • 17.6. CMA CGM S.A.
  • 17.7. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
  • 17.8. Evergreen Marine Corporation, Ltd.
  • 17.9. Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • 17.10. HMM Co., Ltd.
  • 17.11. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
  • 17.12. Matson, Inc.
  • 17.13. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
  • 17.14. Nippon Yusen Kaisha
  • 17.15. Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • 17.16. Pacific International Lines Pte Ltd.
  • 17.17. SITC International Holdings Company Ltd.
  • 17.18. SM Line Corporation
  • 17.19. Wan Hai Lines Ltd.
  • 17.20. X-Press Feeders Ltd.
  • 17.21. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • 17.22. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY LINER SERVICE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY LINER SERVICE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY LINER SERVICE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAMP SERVICE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAMP SERVICE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAMP SERVICE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FIVE FOOT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FIVE FOOT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FIVE FOOT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FOOT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FOOT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FORTY FOOT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TWENTY FOOT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TWENTY FOOT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY TWENTY FOOT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERISHABLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERISHABLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERISHABLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PERISHABLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PERISHABLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PERISHABLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ONCOLOGY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ONCOLOGY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY ONCOLOGY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY VACCINES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY VACCINES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY VACCINES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)