查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1787901

全球硝化抑制劑及尿素酶抑制劑市場分析及預測（至2032年）：依產品類型、營養類型、作物類型、施用方法、通路、最終用戶及地區分類

Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type, Nutrient Type, Crop Type, Application Method, Distribution Channel, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場規模預計在 2025 年達到 33.6 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 55.1 億美元，預測期內的複合年成長率為 7.3%。硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑是用於農業的化合物，透過減緩土壤中氮的轉化來提高氮的利用效率。硝化抑制劑減緩銨轉化為硝酸鹽的速度，從而減少淋溶和氧化亞氮的排放。尿素酶抑制劑可防止尿素快速水解為氨，從而最大限度地減少氮的揮發損失。這些抑制劑透過提高肥料效力和最大限度地減少環境影響來支持永續農業。

根據美國農業部預測，2022年加拿大小麥產量將成長3%。

對永續農業的需求不斷增加

硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑在減少肥料氮損失、改善土壤健康和減少環境污染方面發揮著至關重要的作用。農民正在採用這些抑制劑作為提高氮利用效率並抑制溫室氣體排放的工具。隨著糧食需求的增加和可耕地面積的減少，永續性對於維持長期生產力至關重要。這些抑制劑還能滿足日益成長的監管壓力，以減少硝酸鹽淋失和氨揮發。隨著永續農業的發展勢頭強勁，市場需求預計將大幅成長。

認知和採用有限

許多農民對這些技術、其優勢以及如何應用這些技術缺乏足夠的了解。錯誤的資訊、有限的推廣服務管道以及對現代農業機會的了解有限，阻礙了這些技術的採用。小農戶往往優先考慮短期產量，而非長期的土壤健康和氮肥效率，這使得他們不願意採用優質添加劑。語言障礙、政府宣傳不足以及缺乏有針對性的教育計畫進一步加劇了這個問題。這些知識差距降低了市場滲透率，並減緩了永續肥料管理解決方案的推廣。

與智慧灌溉系統整合

智慧系統可以定時釋放養分，減少浪費，並使施肥與作物需求同步。將這些技術與抑制劑結合，可以增強氮素保留，提高植物吸收效率。先進的感測器技術可以即時監測土壤氮素狀況，從而實現因地制宜的抑制劑施用。這不僅最佳化了資源利用率和產量，還最大限度地減少了對環境的影響。隨著氣候適應農業成為優先事項，這種技術主導的協同效應有望徹底改變養分管理。

肥料價格波動

全球能源價格、原料短缺和地緣政治緊張局勢導致氮肥成本波動，影響農民的購買決策。當肥料價格上漲時，農民可能會減少整體投入，包括抑制劑等添加劑的使用。相反，肥料價格低迷時期會減少對增效產品的需求。這種價格波動帶來了不確定性，並阻礙了對先進養分管理解決方案的長期投資。此外，新興國家對價格敏感的市場尤其脆弱，限制了全球農業領域對抑制劑的穩定需求和成長潛力。

COVID-19的影響：

新冠疫情擾亂了全球農業供應鏈，減緩了肥料和抑制劑的生產和分銷。勞動力短缺和停工影響了田間試驗，並推遲了監管核准。然而，這場危機也增強了人們對韌性農業的興趣，並凸顯了永續農業實踐的重要性。硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑作為在資源受限的情況下最佳化產量的工具而廣受歡迎。疫情後的復甦使人們對土壤健康和投入效率的興趣日益濃厚，這有利於抑制劑的推廣應用。

硝化抑制劑市場預計將在預測期內佔據最大佔有率

預計硝化抑制劑細分市場將在預測期內佔據最大市場佔有率，這得益於永續農業需求的不斷成長以及氮肥利用效率的提高。這些產品可減少硝酸鹽淋失和氧化亞氮排放，有助於滿足環境法規和氣候目標。肥料成本的上漲以及作物產量最大化的需求進一步推動了這些產品的普及。政府的支持性政策以及農民對土壤健康和養分管理意識的不斷提升也推動了市場的成長。

預計葉面噴布領域在預測期內的複合年成長率最高。

葉面噴布由於其簡單易行、對快速生長、營養密集型作物有效，預計將在預測期內呈現最高成長率。葉面噴布能夠在關鍵生長階段精準輸送養分，並迅速被葉片吸收。改良的配方可提高葉片附著力，並最大限度地減少炎熱氣候下的損失。這種方法的適應性和效率是推動葉面噴布抑制劑應用擴大的關鍵因素，尤其是在高價值園藝作物中。

佔比最高的地區：

由於糧食生產需求不斷成長以及高效施肥政策的支持，預計亞太地區將在預測期內佔據最大市場佔有率。印度和中國等國家正在優先考慮環保耕作方法，以減少氮損失並提高農業產量。人們對土壤侵蝕和水污染等環境問題的認知不斷提高，使得抑制劑更具吸引力。該地區農業技術的創新和強大的研發投入正在推動全部區域的市場成長。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

受不斷加強的環境法規、先進的精密農業實踐以及強力的科研舉措的推動，北美地區預計將在預測期內實現最高的複合年成長率。農民正在採用抑制劑來減少氮損失、提高肥料效率並遵守永續性標準。政府的激勵措施以及農業技術公司與科學研究機構之間的合作正在進一步推動成長。人們對土壤健康和水資源保護意識的不斷提高也推動了需求，使該地區成為永續養分管理的領導者。

免費客製化服務：

此報告的訂閱者可以使用以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他市場公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域細分
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行的市場估計、預測和複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 調查範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 次級研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 產品分析
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的影響

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方的議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭對手之間的競爭

5. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（依產品類型）

  • 硝化抑制劑
    • 雙氰胺（DCD）
    • 硝吡啶
    • DMPP（3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸酯）
  • 尿素酶抑制劑（UI）
    • N-（正丁基）硫代磷醯三胺
    • 苯腎上腺素磷脂醯膽鹼酯酶抑制劑（PPD/PPDA）
    • N-(2-硝基苯基)磷三醯胺 (NPPT)
    • 對苯二酚
  • 其他產品類型

6. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（依營養素類型）

  • 氮
  • 氨
  • 硝酸鹽
  • 尿素
  • 其他營養類型

7. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（依作物類型）

  • 糧食
    • 玉米
    • 小麥
    • 米
  • 油籽和豆類
    • 大豆
    • 菜籽
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他作物類型

8. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（依應用）

  • 施肥灌溉
  • 葉面噴布
  • 土壤應用
  • 塗層/顆粒應用
  • 其他用途

9. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（依分銷管道）

  • 網路零售
  • 線下零售

第10章全球硝化和尿素酶抑制劑市場（按最終用戶）

  • 農業部門
    • 農民
    • 農業相關企業
  • 非農業部門
    • 高爾夫球場和草坪管理
    • 園藝
    • 景觀美化
  • 其他最終用戶

11. 全球硝化抑制劑和尿素酶抑制劑市場（按地區）

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第12章 重大進展

  • 協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
  • 收購與合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第13章：公司概況

  • BASF SE
  • The Dow Chemical Company
  • Solvay SA
  • Soilgenic Technologies LLC
  • SKW Piesteritz GmbH
  • SABIC Global Technologies BV
  • Rhodia Operations SASU
  • Nico Orgo Manures
  • National Fertilizers Limited
  • Koch Agronomic Services LLC
  • IFFCO
  • Evonik Industries
  • EuroChem Agro GmbH
  • DowDuPont
  • Corteva Agriscience
  • Compo Expert GmbH
  • Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
  • RainAg
Product Code: SMRC30166

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market is accounted for $3.36 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $5.51 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 7.3% during the forecast period. Nitrification and urease inhibitors are chemical compounds used in agriculture to enhance nitrogen use efficiency by slowing down nitrogen transformations in soil. Nitrification inhibitors delay the conversion of ammonium to nitrate, reducing leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Urease inhibitors prevent the rapid hydrolysis of urea into ammonia, minimizing nitrogen losses through volatilization. These inhibitors support sustainable farming by improving fertilizer effectiveness and minimizing environmental impact.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, in 2022, wheat production in Canada is projected to grow by 3%.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising demand for sustainable agriculture

Nitrification and urease inhibitors play a vital role by minimizing nitrogen losses from fertilizers, improving soil health, and reducing environmental pollution. Farmers are embracing these inhibitors as tools to enhance nitrogen use efficiency while curbing greenhouse gas emissions. With rising food demand and decreasing arable land, sustainability has become essential for long-term productivity. These inhibitors also align with growing regulatory pressures to reduce nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilization. As sustainable agriculture gains momentum, their market demand is expected to surge significantly.

Restraint:

Limited awareness and adoption

Many farmers lack adequate knowledge about these technologies, their benefits, and application methods. Misinformation, limited access to extension services, and low exposure to modern agricultural practices hinder acceptance. Smallholder farmers often prioritize immediate yield returns over long-term soil health or nitrogen efficiency, leading to resistance toward adopting premium additives. Moreover, language barriers, insufficient government outreach, and lack of targeted educational programs further exacerbate the problem. This knowledge gap reduces market penetration and delays the widespread adoption of sustainable fertilizer management solutions.

Opportunity:

Integration with smart irrigation systems

Smart systems enable timed nutrient release, reducing wastage and synchronizing fertilizer applications with crop needs. Coupling these technologies with inhibitors amplifies nitrogen retention and boosts plant uptake efficiency. Advanced sensor technologies allow real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen status, enabling site-specific application of inhibitors. This minimizes environmental impact while optimizing resource use and yields. As climate-resilient farming becomes a priority, this tech-driven synergy is poised to transform nutrient management.

Threat:

Volatile fertilizer prices

Fluctuations in the cost of nitrogen-based fertilizers driven by global energy prices, raw material shortages, and geopolitical tensions affect farmers' purchasing decisions. When fertilizer prices rise sharply, farmers may reduce overall input usage, including additives like inhibitors. Conversely, during periods of low fertilizer prices, the perceived need for efficiency-enhancing products diminishes. This price instability creates uncertainty, discouraging long-term investment in advanced nutrient management solutions. Additionally, price-sensitive markets in developing countries are especially vulnerable, limiting the consistent demand and growth potential of inhibitors across global agricultural sectors.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global agricultural supply chains, delaying production and distribution of fertilizers and inhibitors. Labor shortages and lockdowns affected field trials and slowed regulatory approvals. However, the crisis intensified focus on resilient farming and highlighted the importance of sustainable practices. Nitrification and urease inhibitors gained traction as tools to optimize yields under resource constraints. Post-pandemic recovery saw increased interest in soil health and input efficiency, benefiting inhibitor adoption.

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to the rising demand for sustainable agriculture and enhanced nitrogen use efficiency. These products help reduce nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions, aligning with environmental regulations and climate goals. Increasing fertilizer costs and the need to maximize crop yields further boost their adoption. Supportive government policies and growing awareness among farmers about soil health and nutrient management also propel market growth.

The foliar application segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the foliar application segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, owing to its simplicity and effectiveness for fast-growing, nutrient-intensive crops. It enables precise nutrient delivery during vital growth phases, with nutrients quickly absorbed through the leaves. Improved formulations enhance adherence to foliage and minimize losses in hot climates. This method's adaptability and higher efficiency, particularly in high-value horticultural crops, serve as major factors driving the growing use of foliar-applied inhibitors.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share, fuelled by escalating food production requirements and policy-driven support for efficient fertilizer use. Nations such as India and China are prioritizing eco-friendly farming practices to curb nitrogen loss and enhance agricultural output. Growing awareness of environmental issues like soil erosion and water contamination is increasing the appeal of inhibitors. Innovations in agri-tech and strong local research efforts are propelling the market's growth across the region.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, driven by rising environmental regulations, advanced precision farming practices, and strong research initiatives. Farmers are adopting inhibitors to reduce nitrogen loss, improve fertilizer efficiency, and comply with sustainability standards. Government incentives and collaborations between agritech firms and research institutions further support growth. Increasing awareness of soil health and water conservation also fuels demand, positioning the region as a leader in sustainable nutrient management.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market include BASF SE, The Dow Chemical Company, Solvay S.A, Soilgenic Technologies LLC, SKW Piesteritz GmbH, SABIC Global Technologies BV, Rhodia Operations SASU, Nico Orgo Manures, National Fertilizers Limited, Koch Agronomic Services LLC, IFFCO, Evonik Industries, EuroChem Agro GmbH, DowDuPont, Corteva Agriscience, Compo Expert GmbH, Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd., and RainAg.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, BASF and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. have signed a framework agreement for cathode active materials. Under the agreement, BASF will cooperate with CATL on a global scale. CATL has selected BASF as its important supplier. BASF will support CATL's global layout through its global production network.

In June 2025, Dow announces significant milestones to mark breakthrough innovation with INNATE(TM) TF 220 Resin to help enable the design for recyclability and high-performance BOPE films for flexible packaging. From material design to end-of-life solutions, Dow is collaborating with stakeholders across the packaging chain to create impactful, scalable solutions to today's sustainability challenges - transforming vision into commercial reality.

In April 2022, Koch Agronomic Services, LLC is excited to announce an agreement to collaborate with SVG Ventures|THRIVE, leveraging its Venture & Innovation Platform.This relationship aligns with Koch's focused efforts to expand its portfolio for growers around the globe to improve nutrient efficiency, utilization and uptake.

Product Types Covered:

  • Nitrification Inhibitors
  • Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
  • Other Product Types

Nutrient Types Covered:

  • Nitrogen
  • Ammonia
  • Nitrate
  • Urea
  • Other Nutrient Types

Crop Types Covered:

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & Pulses
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Other Crop Types

Application Methods Covered:

  • Fertigation
  • Foliar
  • Soil Application
  • Coating/Granular Application
  • Other Application Methods

Distribution Channels Covered:

  • Online Retail
  • Offline Retail

End Users Covered:

  • Agricultural Sector
  • Non-Agricultural Sector
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Nitrification Inhibitors
    • 5.2.1 Dicyandiamide (DCD)
    • 5.2.2 Nitrapyrin
    • 5.2.3 DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate)
  • 5.3 Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
    • 5.3.1 N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide
    • 5.3.2 Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA)
    • 5.3.3 N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT)
    • 5.3.4 Hydroquinone
  • 5.4 Other Product Types

6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Nutrient Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Nitrogen
  • 6.3 Ammonia
  • 6.4 Nitrate
  • 6.5 Urea
  • 6.6 Other Nutrient Types

7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Crop Type

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Cereals & Grains
    • 7.2.1 Corn
    • 7.2.2 Wheat
    • 7.2.3 Rice
  • 7.3 Oilseeds & Pulses
    • 7.3.1 Soybean
    • 7.3.2 Canola
  • 7.4 Fruits & Vegetables
  • 7.5 Other Crop Types

8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Application Method

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Fertigation
  • 8.3 Foliar
  • 8.4 Soil Application
  • 8.5 Coating/Granular Application
  • 8.6 Other Application Methods

9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Distribution Channel

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Online Retail
  • 9.3 Offline Retail

10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Agricultural Sector
    • 10.2.1 Farmers
    • 10.2.2 Agribusiness Companies
  • 10.3 Non-Agricultural Sector
    • 10.3.1 Golf Courses & Turf Management
    • 10.3.2 Horticulture
    • 10.3.3 Landscaping
  • 10.4 Other End Users

11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 BASF SE
  • 13.2 The Dow Chemical Company
  • 13.3 Solvay S.A
  • 13.4 Soilgenic Technologies LLC
  • 13.5 SKW Piesteritz GmbH
  • 13.6 SABIC Global Technologies BV
  • 13.7 Rhodia Operations SASU
  • 13.8 Nico Orgo Manures
  • 13.9 National Fertilizers Limited
  • 13.10 Koch Agronomic Services LLC
  • 13.11 IFFCO
  • 13.12 Evonik Industries
  • 13.13 EuroChem Agro GmbH
  • 13.14 DowDuPont
  • 13.15 Corteva Agriscience
  • 13.16 Compo Expert GmbH
  • 13.17 Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
  • 13.18 RainAg

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrification Inhibitors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Dicyandiamide (DCD) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrapyrin (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urease Inhibitors (UIs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Hydroquinone (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Product Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nutrient Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrogen (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Ammonia (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrate (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urea (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Nutrient Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Crop Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Cereals & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Corn (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Wheat (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Rice (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Oilseeds & Pulses (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soybean (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Canola (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fruits & Vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Crop Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Application Method (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fertigation (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Foliar (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soil Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Coating/Granular Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 34 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Application Methods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 35 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Distribution Channel (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 36 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Online Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 37 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Offline Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 38 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 39 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 40 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 41 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agribusiness Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 42 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Non-Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 43 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Golf Courses & Turf Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 44 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Horticulture (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 45 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Landscaping (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 46 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.