查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1912433

半導體塑膠載帶市場按產品類型、材料類型、厚度範圍、寬度範圍、應用和最終用戶分類－全球預測（2026-2032 年）

Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market by Product Type, Material Type, Thickness Range, Width Range, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 187 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，半導體塑膠載帶市場規模將達到 11.5 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 12.4 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 19.7 億美元，年複合成長率為 7.91%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025 11.5億美元
預計年份：2026年 12.4億美元
預測年份：2032年 19.7億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 7.91%

半導體塑膠載帶在整個半導體組裝和電子製造生態系統中扮演著至關重要的角色，它作為連接材料，在自動化處理過程中保護、運輸和呈現元件。封裝密度、表面黏著技術和拾放自動化技術的進步，對載帶的外形尺寸、材料性能和尺寸穩定性提出了更高的要求。隨著裝置小型化和產能需求的不斷成長，載帶的各項特性，例如黏合劑相容性、靜電耗散、尺寸公差和鑽孔精度，對於維持元件完整性和確保下游製程產量比率而言，比以往任何時候都更加重要。

製造商、原始設備製造商 (OEM) 和合約組裝都在尋求能夠與高速卷對卷 (C2C) 製程無縫整合，同時滿足汽車和航太領域安全關鍵型應用可靠性標準的材料。因此，創新如今已不再局限於原料聚合物的選擇，而是擴展到專用塗層、工程化口袋形貌以及製程控制，以最大限度地減少拾取放置過程中的顆粒產生和機械應力。展望未來，產業將持續平衡成本、性能和供應穩定性，這需要對材料科學、零件搬運動態以及不斷變化的法規環境（包括可接受的認證管道）有深入的了解。

技術、供應鏈、監管和永續性的壓力如何重塑各行業的產品設計、採購和認證實踐

受技術、監管和供應鏈等多方面因素的影響，塑膠載帶市場環境正經歷變革性的變化。在技​​術方面，先進封裝技術和高密度組件的日益普及，正推動載帶設計朝著高精度口袋、精細的覆膜性能以及低揮發性和高熱穩定性材料的方向發展。因此，供應商正致力於提高模具精度，並開發聚合物配方，以滿足新一代取放系統所需的機械公差。

評估近期美國關稅趨勢及其對籌資策略、供應商選擇和總落地成本管理的影響

美國不斷變化的關稅政策增加了塑膠膠帶供應商和買家採購及供應鏈規劃的複雜性。對某些進口商品徵收關稅凸顯了原產地歸屬、關稅分類和價值鏈透明度的重要性。為此，採購部門正在調整其採購組合，以降低成本波動並維持關鍵生產線的供應連續性。

詳細的細分分析揭示了產品類型、材料選擇、應用、用例、最終用戶可靠性要求、厚度和寬度等因素如何影響產品開發。

精細化的市場區隔觀點揭示了影響需求模式和創新重點的產品和應用層面的動態。按產品類型分類，市場結構包括基帶、蓋帶和口袋帶。對於蓋帶而言，非穿孔型和穿孔型之間的差異決定了供應可靠性和密封性能；而對於口袋帶而言，12mm、16mm、4mm 和 8mm 等不同間距決定了其與各種零件配置和自動化處理系統的兼容性。在材料類型，聚碳酸酯、聚酯、聚苯乙烯和聚氨酯之間的選擇會影響熱性能、尺寸穩定性和耐磨性，進而影響其與高溫回流焊接製程和長期儲存的兼容性。

區域趨勢和策略性製造地決定了全球需求中心的合格前置作業時間、供應彈性和本地技術支援。

區域趨勢在塑造塑膠載帶解決方案的供應鏈網路、認證週期和上市速度方面發揮著至關重要的作用。在美洲，接近性大規模電子製造地以及汽車和工業OEM廠商的集中分佈，使得靈活的供應鏈和本地認證服務成為可能，從而支持產品發布和衍生產品擴展期間的快速迭代。同時，歐洲、中東和非洲的市場環境複雜多樣，法規結構嚴格，終端用戶標準各異，因此需要本地化的測試能力和多層次的供應商生態系統，才能同時滿足高可靠性航太客戶和對成本敏感的工業買家的需求。

競爭洞察：專業化在模具、塗層、認證服務和區域擴張方面如何創造差異化並推動客戶採納

塑膠載帶市場的競爭格局呈現出多元化的特點，既有專業的聚合物加工商，也有綜合材料公司，還有提供模具塗層認證支援的附加價值服務供應商。主要企業透過投資精密模具、無塵室生產、塗層化學和分析技術來脫穎而出，從而確保一致的公差和低顆粒生成。載帶製造商與取放設備製造商之間的策略聯盟日益普遍，雙方可以共同開發出最佳化生產效率和減少噴嘴磨損的載帶結構和輸送曲線。

為製造商和供應商提供切實可行的步驟，以加快認證進程、實現採購多元化，並將創新與客戶的可靠性和永續性優先事項相契合。

產業領導者應採取有針對性的措施，增強供應鏈韌性，加快產品認證速度，並抓住不斷變化的應用需求所帶來的機會。首先，透過投資模組化模具和快速原型製作能力，縮短新型口袋和蓋帶配置的設計迭代週期。這將有助於縮短客戶引入新組件配置的認證時間。其次，制定多元化籌資策略，將國內加工能力與合格的區域合作夥伴結合，以降低關稅和物流風險，同時保持前置作業時間的應對力。

我們透明的調查方法結合了相關人員訪談、技術文獻綜述和同行檢驗，為包裝和供應決策提供實際的見解。

這些研究結果所依據的調查方法，融合了與產業相關人員的直接對話和嚴謹的二手資料分析，以確保研究的深度和實用性。關鍵資訊是透過對多個終端使用者領域的採購經理、包裝工程師和品管人員進行結構化訪談收集的，並輔以與模具專家和物流供應商的專案討論。這些討論主要圍繞著認證流程的挑戰、公差設定優先順序以及零件處理​​中的成本、前置作業時間和性能之間的權衡。

概述材料創新、籌資策略和供應商合作，以提升零件處理領域的營運韌性和競爭優勢。

總之，塑膠載帶仍然是現代半導體組裝的關鍵基礎技術，材料選擇、封裝槽設計和製程控制的持續改進能夠直接產量比率為更高的良率和更短的生產週期。技術進步、關稅趨勢和區域製造策略的相互作用正在重塑供應商和買家在資格認證、採購和產品開發方面的做法。積極投資精密模具、材料創新和區域轉換能力的公司將更有能力保持營運靈活性，同時滿足終端用戶對高可靠性的嚴格要求。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依產品類型分類）

  • 底膠帶
  • 蓋膠帶
    • 非穿孔型
    • 穿孔型
  • 口袋膠帶
    • 12mm間距
    • 16毫米間距
    • 4mm間距
    • 8mm間距

9. 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依材料類型分類）

  • 聚碳酸酯
  • 聚酯纖維
  • 聚苯乙烯
  • 聚氨酯

第10章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依厚度範圍分類）

  • 0.5～1.0mm
  • 0.5毫米或更小
  • 大於 1.0 毫米

第11章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依寬度範圍分類）

  • 8～16mm
  • 8毫米或更小
  • 超過16毫米

第12章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依應用領域分類）

  • 捲帶式磁帶
  • 托盤包裝
  • 管狀包裝

第13章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依最終用戶分類）

  • 航太/國防
  • 車
  • 家用電器
  • 工業的
  • 電訊

第14章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依地區分類）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第15章 半導體塑膠載帶市場（依類別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第16章 各國半導體塑膠載帶市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章：美國半導體塑膠載帶市場

第17章：中國半導體塑膠載帶市場

第19章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • 3M Company
  • Advantek Inc.
  • Asahi Kasei Corporation
  • Berry Global, Inc.
  • C-Pak Pte Ltd
  • ePAK International, Inc.
  • ITW ECPS（Illinois Tool Works Inc.）
  • Laser Tek Taiwan Co., Ltd.
  • Nippo Co., Ltd.
  • Nitto Denko Corporation
  • Oji F-Tex Co., Ltd.
  • Shin-Etsu Polymer Co., Ltd.
  • Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
  • Taiwan Carrier Tape Enterprise Co., Ltd.
  • Tek Pak Inc.
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB1399D

The Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market was valued at USD 1.15 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.24 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.91%, reaching USD 1.97 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.15 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.24 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1.97 billion
CAGR (%) 7.91%

The plastic carrier tape segment plays an indispensable role across semiconductor assembly and electronics manufacturing ecosystems, serving as the connective material that protects, transports, and presents components during automated handling. Advances in packaging density, surface mount technology, and pick-and-place automation have elevated expectations for tape geometry, material performance, and dimensional consistency. As device form factors shrink and throughput demands increase, tape attributes such as adhesion compatibility, static dissipation, dimensional tolerances, and perforation precision matter more than ever for preserving component integrity and ensuring downstream yield.

Manufacturers, OEMs, and contract assemblers demand materials that integrate seamlessly with high-speed reel-to-reel operations, while also meeting the reliability thresholds of safety-critical applications in automotive and aerospace. Consequently, innovation now extends beyond raw polymer selection to include specialized coatings, engineered pocket geometries, and process controls that minimize particulate generation and mechanical stress during pick-and-place. Looking ahead, the industry will continue to balance cost, performance, and supply resilience, which requires a nuanced understanding of material science, component handling dynamics, and the evolving regulatory environment that frames acceptable qualification pathways.

How technological, supply chain, regulatory, and sustainability pressures are reshaping product design, sourcing, and qualification practices across the industry

The landscape for plastic carrier tape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by convergence of technological, regulatory, and supply chain forces. On the technology front, increasing adoption of advanced packaging techniques and finer pitch components is pushing tape design toward higher precision pockets, refined cover tape properties, and materials engineered for lower outgassing and improved thermal stability. As a result, suppliers are investing in tooling accuracy and polymer formulation to meet the mechanical tolerances demanded by next-generation pick-and-place systems.

Simultaneously, the supply chain landscape is changing as manufacturers seek greater geographic diversification and robustness. Strategic sourcing now emphasizes multi-sourcing strategies and regional qualification capabilities to reduce single-point dependencies. Regulatory trends and tariff dynamics are prompting procurement teams to re-evaluate total landed costs and supplier risk profiles. Meanwhile, sustainability considerations and material circularity are gaining traction, encouraging research into recyclable polymers and reduced additive chemistries. Taken together, these shifts are redefining supplier-client relationships, accelerating product innovation cycles, and increasing the importance of integrated testing and qualification services that can validate tape performance across both legacy and emerging assembly processes.

Assessment of recent United States tariff shifts and how duty exposure is affecting sourcing strategies, supplier qualification, and total landed cost management

Tariff policy developments in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement and supply chain planning for plastic carrier tape suppliers and buyers. The imposition of duties on selected imports has raised attention to origin attribution, customs classification, and the importance of value-chain transparency. Procurement teams are responding by reconfiguring source portfolios to mitigate cost volatility and to maintain continuity of supply for critical production lines.

In practice, buyers are accelerating supplier qualification in nearer-shore locations and demanding greater contractual flexibility to manage duty exposure. Logistics providers and trading partners are adapting by offering customs optimization services and by helping clients explore alternative routes and classification strategies where compliant. For manufacturers that rely on imported intermediate materials, duties have underscored the value of vertical integration and local conversion capabilities as levers to control total landed costs. While tariff landscapes remain dynamic, firms that proactively model duty scenarios and incorporate them into supplier scorecards and cost-to-serve analyses will better preserve margins and maintain operational stability.

Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how product type, material choices, application use cases, end-user reliability requirements, thickness, and width shape product development

A granular segmentation perspective illuminates product- and application-level dynamics that influence demand patterns and innovation priorities. Based on Product Type, the landscape includes Base Tape, Cover Tape, and Pocket Tape; within Cover Tape the distinctions between non-perforated and perforated variants shape feed reliability and sealing characteristics, while Pocket Tape variations across 12mm pitch, 16mm pitch, 4mm pitch, and 8mm pitch define compatibility with diverse component geometries and automated handling systems. Based on Material Type, choices among polycarbonate, polyester, polystyrene, and polyurethane impact thermal performance, dimensional stability, and abrasion resistance, which in turn affect compatibility with high temperature reflow profiles and long-term storage.

Based on Application, solutions oriented toward tape and reel, tray packaging, and tube packaging exhibit different requirements for handling stress, static control, and mechanical restraint during transit. Based on End User, distinctive reliability demands from aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial, and telecom segments drive divergent qualification standards and batch traceability expectations. Based on Thickness Range, options spanning 0.5 to 1.0 mm, less than 0.5 mm, and greater than 1.0 mm correlate to rigidity and pocket depth needs tied to component height and pick accuracy. Based on Width Range, configurations from 8 to 16 mm, under 8 mm, and over 16 mm determine reel compatibility and component density economics. By integrating these segmentation lenses, suppliers can prioritize development roadmaps that align material science investments with the end-user reliability regimes and automated handling constraints that ultimately determine adoption.

Regional dynamics and strategic manufacturing footprints that determine qualification lead times, supply resilience, and localized technical support across global demand centers

Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping supply networks, qualification cycles, and speed-to-market for plastic carrier tape solutions. In the Americas, proximity to large electronic manufacturing hubs and a concentration of automotive and industrial OEMs favor responsive supply arrangements and onshore qualification services, which support rapid iterations during product launches and variant ramps. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa reflects a heterogeneous landscape where stringent regulatory frameworks and diverse end-user standards necessitate localized testing capabilities and multi-tiered supplier ecosystems to serve both high-reliability aerospace customers and cost-sensitive industrial buyers.

Asia-Pacific continues to be a central hub for both component assembly and upstream polymer conversion, driving a dense supplier base and specialized manufacturing capabilities. This regional concentration enables economies of scale and rapid innovation cycles but also elevates interdependence risks related to logistics and policy shifts. Across all regions, geographic strategy matters not only for cost and lead time, but also for qualification latency, responsiveness to design changes, and the ability to provide localized technical support for assembly process integration. Companies that align regional manufacturing footprints with customer qualification requirements will maintain competitive agility in an increasingly interconnected supply environment.

Competitive landscape insights showing how specialization in tooling, coatings, qualification services, and regional presence creates differentiation and supports customer adoption

The competitive field for plastic carrier tape is characterized by a mix of specialized polymer converters, integrated materials firms, and value-added service providers that offer tooling, coating, and qualification support. Leading players differentiate through investments in precision tooling, cleanroom manufacturing, coating chemistries, and analytics that underpin consistent tolerances and low particulate generation. Strategic partnerships between tape producers and pick-and-place equipment manufacturers are becoming more common, enabling co-development of pocket geometries and cover tape feed profiles that optimize throughput and reduce nozzle wear.

Additionally, several suppliers are expanding capabilities into end-to-end packaging solutions, including certified traceability, lot-based testing, and qualification documentation tailored to regulated end-users in aerospace and automotive. Others are focusing on sustainability improvements, such as reformulated polymers and lower-impact production processes, to meet customer-directed environmental procurement requirements. The companies that succeed will blend technical differentiation with disciplined operational excellence, making investments in quality systems, customer-facing service models, and regional manufacturing presence to support rapid qualification and aftermarket support.

Actionable steps for manufacturers and suppliers to accelerate qualification, diversify sourcing, and align technical innovation with customer reliability and sustainability priorities

Industry leaders should take targeted actions to strengthen supply resilience, accelerate product qualification, and capture opportunities arising from evolving application requirements. First, invest in modular tooling and rapid prototyping capabilities to shorten design iteration cycles for new pocket geometries and cover tape formats; this will reduce time-to-qualify for customers deploying novel component form factors. Second, develop multi-sourcing strategies that pair domestic conversion capacity with qualified regional partners to mitigate duty exposure and logistics risk while preserving lead-time responsiveness.

Third, formalize technical partnerships with equipment OEMs and contract manufacturers to co-develop tape specifications that minimize pick-and-place failures and extend nozzle life. Fourth, prioritize material science investments that enhance thermal stability, reduce outgassing, and enable recyclable formulations where feasible, thereby addressing both reliability and sustainability requirements. Fifth, expand value-added services such as lot-level testing, digital traceability, and application engineering support so customers can accelerate qualification and reduce onboarding friction. By executing these actions, manufacturers can translate technical capabilities into differentiated commercial offerings and heightened customer retention.

Transparent methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and cross-validation to ensure practical and actionable insights for packaging and supply decisions

The research methodology underpinning these insights blends primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis to ensure both depth and practical relevance. Primary input was gathered through structured interviews with procurement leads, packaging engineers, and quality managers across multiple end-user segments, supplemented by targeted discussions with tooling specialists and logistics providers. These conversations focused on qualification pain points, tolerancing priorities, and the trade-offs organizations make between cost, lead time, and performance during component handling.

Secondary analysis incorporated technical literature on polymer properties, standards related to component packaging and handling, and publicly available regulatory guidance affecting cross-border trade and compliance. Data triangulation emphasized recurring themes rather than proprietary figures, with an emphasis on observable operational trends such as accelerated qualification cycles, the increasing importance of regional conversion, and the demand for low-particulate manufacturing. Throughout, methodological rigor was maintained by cross-validating claims from supplier and buyer interviews and by testing hypothesis-driven scenarios that reflect realistic procurement and production constraints.

Concluding synthesis that ties material innovation, sourcing strategies, and supplier collaboration to operational resilience and competitive differentiation in component handling

In conclusion, plastic carrier tape remains a critical enabler of modern semiconductor assembly, where incremental improvements in material selection, pocket geometry, and process control translate directly into higher yields and faster ramp cycles. The interplay of technological advancement, tariff dynamics, and regional manufacturing strategies is reshaping how suppliers and buyers approach qualification, sourcing, and product development. Companies that proactively invest in precise tooling, material innovation, and regional conversion capabilities will be better positioned to meet the stringent demands of high-reliability end-users while preserving operational agility.

Moving forward, alignment between tape providers and equipment OEMs, coupled with robust supplier qualification frameworks and diversified sourcing, will determine who can rapidly support evolving component densities and new packaging modalities. By focusing on actionable improvements that reduce qualification latency, lower handling risk, and enhance environmental performance, organizations can convert supply chain complexity into a source of competitive advantage rather than a constraint.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Base Tape
  • 8.2. Cover Tape
    • 8.2.1. Non Perforated
    • 8.2.2. Perforated
  • 8.3. Pocket Tape
    • 8.3.1. 12Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.2. 16Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.3. 4Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.4. 8Mm Pitch

9. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Material Type

  • 9.1. Polycarbonate
  • 9.2. Polyester
  • 9.3. Polystyrene
  • 9.4. Polyurethane

10. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Thickness Range

  • 10.1. 0.5 To 1.0 Mm
  • 10.2. <0.5 Mm
  • 10.3. >1.0 Mm

11. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Width Range

  • 11.1. 8 To 16 Mm
  • 11.2. <8 Mm
  • 11.3. >16 Mm

12. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Tape And Reel
  • 12.2. Tray Packaging
  • 12.3. Tube Packaging

13. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Aerospace & Defense
  • 13.2. Automotive
  • 13.3. Consumer Electronics
  • 13.4. Industrial
  • 13.5. Telecom

14. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market

18. China Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. 3M Company
  • 19.6. Advantek Inc.
  • 19.7. Asahi Kasei Corporation
  • 19.8. Berry Global, Inc.
  • 19.9. C-Pak Pte Ltd
  • 19.10. ePAK International, Inc.
  • 19.11. ITW ECPS (Illinois Tool Works Inc.)
  • 19.12. Laser Tek Taiwan Co., Ltd.
  • 19.13. Nippo Co., Ltd.
  • 19.14. Nitto Denko Corporation
  • 19.15. Oji F-Tex Co., Ltd.
  • 19.16. Shin-Etsu Polymer Co., Ltd.
  • 19.17. Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
  • 19.18. Taiwan Carrier Tape Enterprise Co., Ltd.
  • 19.19. Tek Pak Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)