![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2045955
ESG評級服務市場-全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會與預測:按服務類型、應用、地區和競爭格局分類,2021-2031年ESG Rating Service Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Service Type, By Application, By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F |
||||||
全球 ESG評級服務市場預計將從 2025 年的 124.3 億美元成長到 2031 年的 169.5 億美元,複合年成長率為 5.31%。
獨立機構和數據提供者正湧入這個市場,評估和評級企業的環境、社會和管治(ESG) 韌性,使相關人員能夠量化非財務風險。這一成長主要得益於強制性資訊揭露法規(例如歐盟的《企業永續發展報告指令》)的嚴格執行,以及對需要嚴格檢驗的永續投資組合的資本配置不斷增加。全球永續投資聯盟 (GSIA) 預測,到 2025 年,採用負責任和永續投資方法的基金管理資產總額將達到 16.7 兆美元,凸顯了這些成長要素的重要性。然而,該行業面臨一項重大挑戰:調查方法缺乏標準化,導致同一家公司在不同提供者處傾向於給予相互矛盾的評分。這種低相關性令試圖整合這些指標的資產管理公司感到困惑,並引發了人們對永續性聲明可信度的擔憂。因此,缺乏統一的全球框架來確保數據可比性構成了一項重大挑戰,可能會阻礙市場信譽和長期成長。
| 市場概覽 | |
|---|---|
| 預測期 | 2027-2031 |
| 市場規模:2025年 | 124.3億美元 |
| 市場規模:2031年 | 169.5億美元 |
| 複合年成長率:2026-2031年 | 5.31% |
| 成長最快的細分市場 | 環境、社會及公司治理(ESG)報告及揭露 |
| 最大的市場 | 北美洲 |
隨著世界各國政府實施更嚴格的非財務報告標準,日益成長的監管要求已成為全球ESG評級服務市場的主要驅動力。例如,歐盟的《永續性報告指令》要求企業揭露詳細的永續發展數據,並要求第三方檢驗以確保合規並避免處罰。這種監管壓力正將ESG評級從可有可無的品牌宣傳工具轉變為企業營運的必要組成部分。這種影響在投資者情緒中得到了清楚的體現。普華永道2024年12月的一項調查顯示,64%的投資者認為政府監管是其投資組合公司變革的關鍵促進因素,這使得評級機構對於將複雜的合規數據轉化為符合不斷變化的法律義務的標準化評分至關重要。同時,機構投資者對永續投資策略日益成長的需求也催生了對獨立評級服務的迫切需求。資產管理公司因涉嫌「綠色清洗」而受到嚴格審查,它們越來越依賴外部評級來建立可信的投資組合,並支持其向客戶提出的永續發展聲明。這一趨勢導致大量資本需要嚴格的篩檢。晨星公司在2024年11月發布的報告顯示,全球ESG基金的管理資產規模在2024年第三季達到3.3兆美元。然而,有效管理這筆資金在很大程度上依賴於評級機構提供的數據的完整性。德勤在2024年9月發布的一份報告凸顯了這種依賴性,該報告指出,57%的高階主管認為數據品質是他們在ESG報告方面面臨的最大挑戰。因此,評級服務在彌合企業數據不一致與成熟投資者需求之間的差距方面發揮著至關重要的作用。
調查方法缺乏標準化是全球ESG評級服務市場面臨的主要障礙。由於獨立機構採用各自獨立且往往不透明的演算法,同一家公司的評分經常出現顯著差異。這種不一致使得資產管理公司和投資人難以準確比較各公司的永續發展績效,進而削弱了ESG評級的根本效用。結果,這些指標的可靠性受到質疑,原本被寄予厚望的市場需求驅動相關人員信心大減。這種信心的缺失導致資本配置猶豫不決,直接阻礙了市場擴張。當投資人對檢驗永續發展聲明缺乏信心時,他們會猶豫是否要投資以ESG為重點的投資組合,最終導致對評級服務的需求下降。這種影響是可以量化的。根據責任投資協會(Responsible Investment Association)預測,到2025年,超過一半(54%)的受訪者將承認,對「漂綠色清洗 )的擔憂正在阻礙責任投資的發展。這種被動的態度縮小了評級機構的潛在市場,因為對數據有效性的懷疑阻礙了永續資本流入的激增。
人工智慧 (AI) 與另類數據的整合正在從根本上改變全球 ESG評級服務市場,有效應對了數據品質這一長期存在的挑戰。服務提供者正日益利用自然語言處理和衛星影像技術,從非政府組織報告和新聞推送等非企業資訊來源收集非結構化訊息,從而減少對可能存在偏見的自我報告資訊的依賴。這種技術變革使得風險評估更加客觀、即時,能夠捕捉傳統事後報告中常被忽略的動態爭議。業界顯然正積極擁抱這一轉變。根據湯森路透 2024 年 11 月發布的報告,77% 的受訪者認為,人工智慧將在未來五年內對 ESG 相關營運產生重大或變革性影響。同時,市場正透過超越單純關注碳排放,並將生物多樣性和自然相關風險納入考量,實現顯著擴張。鑑於人們認知到自然損失帶來的系統性金融風險堪比氣候變化,投資者越來越要求獲得關於用水量、森林砍伐和生態系統健康狀況的詳細指標。這一廣泛的範圍正透過諸如自然金融揭露工作組(TNFD)等框架進行標準化,該工作組要求評級機構將複雜的生物學數據納入其評分模型。這項變革的勢頭強勁,根據TNFD在2024年10月發布的公告,已有超過500家機構(管理資產規模達17.7兆美元)承諾採用這些自然風險報告標準。
The Global ESG Rating Service Market is projected to grow from USD 12.43 Billion in 2025 to USD 16.95 Billion by 2031, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.31%. This market involves independent agencies and data providers that assess and score corporate entities on their environmental, social, and governance resilience, enabling stakeholders to quantify non-financial risks. This growth is primarily fueled by the strict enforcement of mandatory disclosure regulations, such as the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, and the increasing allocation of capital towards sustainable portfolios that require robust verification. By 2025, fund assets utilizing responsible or sustainable investment approaches reached USD 16.7 trillion, according to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, underscoring the significance of this driver.However, the industry faces a significant obstacle due to the lack of methodological standardization, which often leads to inconsistent scores from different providers for the same company. This low correlation creates confusion for asset managers attempting to integrate these metrics and raises concerns regarding the credibility of sustainability claims. Consequently, the absence of a unified global framework for data comparability poses a critical challenge that could hinder the market's reliability and long-term expansion.
| Market Overview | |
|---|---|
| Forecast Period | 2027-2031 |
| Market Size 2025 | USD 12.43 Billion |
| Market Size 2031 | USD 16.95 Billion |
| CAGR 2026-2031 | 5.31% |
| Fastest Growing Segment | ESG Reporting and Disclosure |
| Largest Market | North America |
Market Driver
The increasing number of regulatory mandates serves as the primary impetus for the Global ESG Rating Service Market, as governments worldwide enact more stringent non-financial reporting standards. Directives like the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive oblige companies to disclose detailed sustainability data, necessitating third-party verification to ensure compliance and avoid penalties. This regulatory pressure transforms ESG ratings from a voluntary branding tool into a crucial operational necessity. The impact of this influence is evident in investor sentiment; a December 2024 PwC survey found that 64% of investors identify government regulation as a significant factor driving change in the businesses they invest in, making rating agencies vital for converting complex compliance data into standardized scores that meet these evolving legal obligations.Simultaneously, the rising institutional demand for sustainable investment strategies creates an urgent need for independent assessment services. Asset managers, under scrutiny for potential greenwashing, increasingly depend on external ratings to build credible portfolios and validate sustainability claims to their clients. This trend has led to a substantial accumulation of capital that requires rigorous screening. Morningstar reported in November 2024 that global ESG fund assets climbed to USD 3.3 trillion in the third quarter of 2024. However, the effective deployment of this capital relies heavily on the data integrity provided by rating firms, a reliance highlighted by corporate challenges where 57% of executives cited data quality as their biggest hurdle in ESG reporting, according to a September 2024 Deloitte report. Thus, rating services bridge the gap between inconsistent corporate data and sophisticated investor requirements.
Market Challenge
The absence of methodological standardization presents a formidable barrier to the Global ESG Rating Service Market. Given that independent agencies employ proprietary and often non-transparent algorithms, scores for identical corporate entities frequently exhibit significant discrepancies. This inconsistency diminishes the fundamental utility of ESG ratings, as asset managers and investors struggle to accurately compare companies' sustainability performance. As a result, the reliability of these metrics is questioned, leading to a widespread erosion of trust among the very stakeholders expected to fuel market demand.This credibility gap directly impedes market expansion by fostering hesitation in capital allocation. When investors lack confidence in verifying sustainability claims, they become reluctant to commit funds to ESG-focused portfolios, thereby reducing the demand for rating services. The impact is measurable; in 2025, over half of respondents (54%) acknowledged that greenwashing concerns deter them from responsible investment, according to the Responsible Investment Association. Such reluctance shrinks the addressable market for rating providers, as the anticipated surge in sustainable capital inflows is hampered by skepticism regarding data validity.
Market Trends
The integration of artificial intelligence and alternative data is fundamentally transforming the Global ESG Rating Service Market by addressing persistent data quality challenges. Providers are increasingly utilizing natural language processing and satellite imagery to gather unstructured information from non-corporate sources, such as NGO reports and news feeds, thereby lessening their dependence on potentially biased self-reported disclosures. This technological shift enables the creation of more objective, real-time risk assessments that can capture dynamic controversies often missed by traditional, retrospective reporting. This transition is clearly embraced by the industry; a November 2024 Thomson Reuters report indicated that 77% of survey respondents believe AI will have a high or transformative impact on their ESG-related work within the next five years.Concurrently, the market is undergoing a significant expansion through the inclusion of biodiversity and nature-related risks, moving beyond a sole focus on carbon emissions. Investors are increasingly seeking granular metrics on water usage, deforestation, and ecosystem integrity, driven by the understanding that nature loss poses systemic financial threats comparable to climate change. This broader scope is being standardized by frameworks like the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), which require rating agencies to incorporate complex biological data into their scoring models. The momentum behind this shift is substantial; an October 2024 announcement from the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures reported that over 500 organizations, collectively representing USD 17.7 trillion in assets under management, have committed to adopting these nature-related risk reporting standards.
Report Scope
In this report, the Global ESG Rating Service Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:
Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global ESG Rating Service Market.
Global ESG Rating Service Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report: