海洋生物刺激素市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測，按成分、應用模式、最終用途、地區和競爭細分，2020-2030 年預測

2024年，全球海洋生物刺激素市場規模為12.8012億美元，預計2030年將達到17.4809億美元，預測期內複合年成長率為5.33%。受永續作物投入需求成長、養分利用效率提高以及抗逆能力增強的推動，全球海洋生物刺激素市場正經歷強勁成長。該市場以海藻萃取物為主，受益於水產養殖業的擴張、監管支持和精準農業的整合，使海洋生物刺激素成為全球永續農業集約化的關鍵推動因素。

關鍵市場促進因素

向永續、低投入農業轉型

主要市場挑戰

科學證據的差距與試驗設計挑戰

主要市場趨勢

與精準農業和數位決策支援的整合

目錄

第 1 章：產品概述

第2章：研究方法

第3章：執行摘要

第4章：全球海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 依成分（海藻萃取物、魚蛋白水解物、殼聚醣和海洋多醣、其他）
  • 依施用方式（葉面處理、土壤處理、種子處理）
  • 依最終用途（行栽作物和穀物、水果和蔬菜、草皮和觀賞植物、其他）
  • 按地區
  • 按公司分類（2024 年）
• 市場地圖

第5章：北美海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 按成分
  • 按申請方式
  • 按最終用途
  • 按國家
• 北美：國家分析
  • 美國
  • 墨西哥
  • 加拿大

第6章：歐洲海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 歐洲：國家分析
  • 法國
  • 德國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙

第7章：亞太海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 亞太地區：國家分析
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 韓國
  • 日本
  • 澳洲

第8章：南美洲海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 南美洲：國家分析
  • 巴西
  • 阿根廷
  • 哥倫比亞

第9章：中東和非洲海洋生物刺激素市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• MEA：國家分析
  • 南非
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國

第10章：市場動態

• 驅動程式
• 挑戰

第 11 章：市場趨勢與發展

• 合併與收購（如有）
• 產品發布（如有）
• 最新動態

第 12 章：全球海洋生物刺激素市場：SWOT 分析

第 13 章：波特五力分析

• 產業競爭
• 新進入者的潛力
• 供應商的力量
• 顧客的力量
• 替代產品的威脅

第 14 章：競爭格局

• Acadian Seaplants Limited
• UPL LTD
• BioAtlantis Ltd.
• Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
• Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
• ClimaCrew Pvt Ltd
• Ocean Rainforest Group
• Thorvin, Inc.
• Futureco Bioscience
• Brandt, Inc.

第 15 章：策略建議

第16章調查會社について,免責事項

Global Marine Biostimulants Market was valued at USD 1280.12 Million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 1748.09 Million by 2030 with a CAGR of 5.33% during the forecast period. The global marine biostimulants market is witnessing robust growth, driven by rising demand for sustainable crop inputs, improved nutrient-use efficiency, and enhanced stress resilience. Dominated by seaweed extracts, the market benefits from expanding aquaculture, regulatory support, and precision agriculture integration, positioning marine biostimulants as key enablers of sustainable agricultural intensification worldwide.

Key Market Drivers

Shift Toward Sustainable, Low-Input Agriculture

In the modern agricultural landscape, stakeholders, including farmers, agribusinesses, and policymakers, are increasingly pressured to reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and enhance nutrient-use efficiency (NUE). This comes amid mounting concerns over environmental degradation, rising input costs, and climate change. Marine biostimulants, derived from seaweed, algae, chitosan, and fish by-products, are at the nexus of sustainable intensification, enabling farms to do more with less.

Marine biostimulants stimulate natural plant processes to better uptake and assimilate nutrients, often enabling meaningful reductions in synthetic fertilizer use without sacrificing yield. Meta-analyses show average yield gains of around 18% when biostimulants are used under field conditions, demonstrating their potential to boost productivity while easing fertilizer pressure. Another study highlights that foliar applications of amino acid-based biostimulants (Terramin Pro) increased NUE by 28% in wheat, while protein hydrolysates improved NUE by 12.9% in spinach, and seaweed extract enhanced NUE by 16% in rapeseed and wheat.

Agronomic trials provide compelling evidence that biostimulants can significantly lower fertilizer requirements. In one trial conducted in Thailand, farmers achieved a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer application, with yields maintained, through combined application of biostimulants and reduced fertilizer rates. This demonstrates that growers can substantially cut input costs and environmental impacts while preserving productivity.

Excessive fertilizer use carries heavy environmental and economic costs. Globally, about 40-70% of applied nitrogen and up to 80-90% of phosphorus from conventional fertilizers may be lost to the environment through runoff, volatilization, or fixation, representing enormous inefficiencies and ecological burdens. The ability of marine biostimulants to moderate fertilizer use and enhance nutrient recovery can help tilt that balance in favor of sustainability.

Complementing these benefits, biostimulants also improve crop resilience and quality under stress conditions. For instance, foliar seaweed extracts (from Kappaphycus alvarezii and Gracilaria edulis) led to yield increases of 18.5% and 26.0% in maize, respectively, even in water-limited environments. These gains further validate that reduced-input systems, when aided by biostimulants, can still thrive under sub-optimal growing conditions.

Beyond agronomic performance, reducing fertilizer use offers clear economic rewards. In the U.S., nutrient inputs account for about 11.3% of total production costs in row crops. Notably, just a 20% improvement in NUE could raise net profit by approximately 1.3%, underscoring the attractive return potential of biostimulant adoption. These figures frame biostimulants as both ecological and financial levers for optimizing input use.

Key Market Challenges

Scientific Evidence Gaps and Trial Design Challenges

One of the central obstacles in the marine biostimulants market is the gap between controlled research outcomes and field-scale adoption. While a substantial number of laboratory and greenhouse studies highlight positive effects of seaweed extracts, chitosan, and other marine-derived compounds on nutrient-use efficiency, stress tolerance, and crop quality, translating these benefits into commercial agriculture remains challenging.

A key issue lies in the limited availability of multi-site, multi-season field trials. Controlled conditions often minimize variables, producing clearer results, but real-world farming is influenced by soil heterogeneity, climate fluctuations, management practices, and pest pressures. The lack of replicated, independent field trials across geographies and crop types reduces the robustness of evidence available to agronomists and growers. This makes it difficult to establish universal best-practice recommendations for dosage, application timing, and crop-specific benefits.

Moreover, heterogeneity in trial design-such as different endpoints (yield, quality, physiological parameters), diverse statistical methodologies, and inconsistent product formulations-further complicates comparison and meta-analysis. Without standardized protocols, drawing broad conclusions or benchmarking performance across competing products is problematic.

The consequence is a credibility gap. Farmers and large commercial agronomy programs, particularly in row crops where input risks are high, remain cautious in adopting marine biostimulants without demonstrable, repeatable returns on investment. To bridge this divide, the industry requires coordinated field-testing frameworks, transparent data sharing, and standardized efficacy metrics. Only with such scientific rigor can biostimulants progress from promising niche inputs to reliable components of mainstream agricultural programs.

Key Market Trends

Integration with Precision Agriculture and Digital Decision Support

One of the most transformative trends for the marine biostimulants market is their integration with precision agriculture technologies. While biostimulants have shown potential in enhancing plant resilience, nutrient uptake, and yield stability, their effectiveness often depends on precise timing, dosage, and placement. Traditional blanket applications across entire fields can dilute results and limit measurable benefits. By leveraging digital tools and precision platforms, agronomists can now optimize the use of biostimulants to maximize return on investment (ROI).

Technologies such as IoT-enabled soil and crop sensors, satellite imagery, and drones provide real-time data on plant health, moisture stress, and nutrient deficiencies. When integrated with biostimulant application programs, this allows for site-specific treatments, targeting only those areas where crops are most likely to respond. For instance, variable-rate applicators and drone-based foliar spraying can deliver products more efficiently, reducing waste and lowering overall input costs.

In addition, decision support systems (DSS) powered by AI and big data analytics are beginning to incorporate biostimulants into their agronomic recommendations. These platforms analyze historical yield maps, weather forecasts, and crop models to guide farmers on when and how to apply marine biostimulants for maximum efficacy.

This "biostimulants + tech" model not only improves performance consistency but also generates quantifiable evidence of ROI, a critical factor for expanding adoption in row crops. As more pilot projects and extension services demonstrate these integrated approaches, digital compatibility will likely become a key differentiator for leading biostimulant suppliers.

Key Market Players

• Acadian Seaplants Limited
• UPL LTD
• BioAtlantis Ltd.
• Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
• Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
• ClimaCrew Pvt Ltd
• Ocean Rainforest Group
• Thorvin, Inc.
• Futureco Bioscience
• Brandt, Inc.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Marine Biostimulants Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Marine Biostimulants Market, By Ingredient:

• Seaweed Extracts
• Fish Protein Hydrolysates
• Chitosan and Marine Polysaccharides
• Others

Marine Biostimulants Market, By Mode of Application:

• Foliar Treatment
• Soil Treatment
• Seed Treatment

Marine Biostimulants Market, By End Use:

• Row Crops & Cereals
• Fruits & vegetables
• Turf and Ornamentals
• Others

Marine Biostimulants Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Marine Biostimulants Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Marine Biostimulants Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Global Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 4.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 4.1.1. By Value
• 4.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 4.2.1. By Ingredient (Seaweed Extracts, Fish Protein Hydrolysates, Chitosan and Marine Polysaccharides, Others)
  • 4.2.2. By Mode of Application (Foliar Treatment, Soil Treatment, Seed Treatment)
  • 4.2.3. By End Use (Row Crops & Cereals, Fruits & vegetables, Turf and Ornamentals, Others)
  • 4.2.4. By Region
  • 4.2.5. By Company (2024)
• 4.3. Market Map

5. North America Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Ingredient
  • 5.2.2. By Mode of Application
  • 5.2.3. By End Use
  • 5.2.4. By Country
• 5.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 5.3.1. United States Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 5.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 5.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 5.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 5.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 5.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 5.3.1.2.3. By End Use
  • 5.3.2. Mexico Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 5.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 5.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 5.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 5.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 5.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 5.3.2.2.3. By End Use
  • 5.3.3. Canada Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 5.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 5.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 5.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 5.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 5.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 5.3.3.2.3. By End Use

6. Europe Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Ingredient
  • 6.2.2. By Mode of Application
  • 6.2.3. By End Use
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. France Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By End Use
  • 6.3.2. Germany Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By End Use
  • 6.3.3. United Kingdom Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By End Use
  • 6.3.4. Italy Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 6.3.4.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 6.3.4.2.3. By End Use
  • 6.3.5. Spain Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 6.3.5.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 6.3.5.2.3. By End Use

7. Asia-Pacific Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Ingredient
  • 7.2.2. By Mode of Application
  • 7.2.3. By End Use
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. China Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By End Use
  • 7.3.2. India Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By End Use
  • 7.3.3. South Korea Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By End Use
  • 7.3.4. Japan Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By End Use
  • 7.3.5. Australia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By End Use

8. South America Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Ingredient
  • 8.2.2. By Mode of Application
  • 8.2.3. By End Use
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. Brazil Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By End Use
  • 8.3.2. Argentina Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By End Use
  • 8.3.3. Colombia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By End Use

9. Middle East and Africa Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Ingredient
  • 9.2.2. By Mode of Application
  • 9.2.3. By End Use
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. South Africa Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By End Use
  • 9.3.2. Saudi Arabia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By End Use
  • 9.3.3. UAE Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By End Use

10. Market Dynamics

• 10.1. Drivers
• 10.2. Challenges

11. Market Trends & Developments

• 11.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 11.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 11.3. Recent Developments

12. Global Marine Biostimulants Market: SWOT Analysis

13. Porters Five Forces Analysis

• 13.1. Competition in the Industry
• 13.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 13.3. Power of Suppliers
• 13.4. Power of Customers
• 13.5. Threat of Substitute Products

14. Competitive Landscape

• 14.1. Acadian Seaplants Limited
  • 14.1.1. Business Overview
  • 14.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 14.1.3. Products & Service Offerings
  • 14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 14.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 14.2. UPL LTD
• 14.3. BioAtlantis Ltd.
• 14.4. Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
• 14.5. Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
• 14.6. ClimaCrew Pvt Ltd
• 14.7. Ocean Rainforest Group
• 14.8. Thorvin, Inc.
• 14.9. Futureco Bioscience
• 14.10. Brandt, Inc.

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer