查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2075005

社區物流協調市場預測至2034年—按服務類型、平台類型、交付模式、車輛、技術、最終用戶和地區分類的全球分析

Community Logistics Coordination Market Forecasts to 2034 - Global Analysis By Service Type, Platform Type, Delivery Model, Vehicle, Technology, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，預計到 2026 年，全球社區物流協調市場規模將達到 185 億美元，並在預測期內以 14.0% 的複合年成長率成長，到 2034 年將達到 528 億美元。

社區物流協調是指透過共用基礎設施和協調運營，最佳化在地化城市網路中貨物運輸、儲存和配送的協作系統。這些平台將零售商、承運商、零工人員和地方政府納入一個一體化的協調框架。該技術包括運輸管理系統、倉儲平台、路線最佳化演算法、即時視覺化工具以及利用人工智慧和感測器網路的雲端物流應用。社區物流協調正在惠及電子商務零售商、食品配送服務商、醫療用品經銷商以及致力於緩解交通堵塞和提高配送效率的城市規劃部門。

電子商務配送量激增

網路零售的爆炸性成長和「當日達」需求的不斷攀升，正顯著推動社區物流協調解決方案的需求。都市區的「最後一公里」配送量急劇增加，給傳統交通網路帶來了巨大壓力。消費者期望更快、更靈活的配送時間，這就需要多方物流協調。零售商正尋求透過共用配送網路和路線整合來降低配送成本。地方政府也支持協同物流，作為減少交通堵塞和排放氣體的一種方式。

協調相關人員之間的複雜性

在共用社區框架內協調多個相互競爭的物流相關人員，對平台提供者而言是一項重大的營運挑戰。零售商、承運商和零工人員在配送速度、成本和服務品質方面存在著相互衝突的優先事項。競爭對手之間的資料共用引發了反壟斷和保密方面的擔憂，限制了透明度。參與者對於共用基礎設施投資的收益分成模式仍存在分歧。多方合約和責任框架的複雜性減緩了平台的普及和網路擴展。

微型倉配網路

在都市區社區部署社區主導、協同運作的微型倉配中心，為物流平台帶來了變革性的成長機會。位於人口密集住宅附近的小規模自動化倉庫能夠實現快速的訂單處理和配送。共用微型倉配中心）的整合，建構了一個靈活的履約網路。社區協同運作能夠同時最佳化多個經銷商的庫存配置和補貨。

運輸公司面臨整合壓力

全球物流承運商日益集中化，威脅著依賴多家承運商參與的社區協調模式的生存。大型承運商正擴大建立自己的「最後一公里」網路，完全繞過共用協調平台。亞馬遜和大型零售商的垂直整合顯著降低了對第三方協調的需求。隨著市場集中度的提高，承運商的定價權也不斷增強。現有物流網路的壟斷地位限制了社區協調模式可涵蓋的市場範圍。

新型冠狀病毒（COVID-19）的影響：

新冠疫情大大加速了社區物流協調的發展，因為配送量遠遠超過了傳統物流公司的運力。封鎖措施使得群眾外包配送網路和共用配送基礎設施的快速部署變得至關重要。非接觸式配送協議需要零售商、物流公司和消費者之間的協調配合。即使在疫情結束後，由於電子商務交易的成長，對協作物流的需求依然存在。這場危機充分展現了靈活的多方協調在供應鏈中斷期間的價值。

在預測期內，「共用配送」細分市場預計將佔據最大佔有率。

在預測期內，「共用配送」細分市場預計將佔據最大的市場佔有率，這主要得益於人口密集城市地區整合最後一公里配送業務的迫切需求。共用模式減少了重複的配送車輛路線及其相關的排放氣體。零售商透過整合配送路線和共用倉儲空間來降低成本。地方政府支持共用配送，將其作為緩解交通堵塞措施的一部分。該細分市場受益於與承運商建立的穩固合作關係和成熟的營運模式。

預計在預測期內，運輸管理系統細分市場將呈現最高的複合年成長率。

在預測期內，運輸管理系統領域預計將呈現最高的成長率，這主要得益於對高效協調本地物流網路和最後一公里配送營運日益成長的需求。都市化、對即時貨物追蹤的需求不斷成長以及運輸資源共用的擴大，都在加速該領域的應用。這些系統能夠實現路線最佳化、車輛追蹤和資源分配，從而提高營運效率並降低配送成本。此外，雲端平台、人工智慧分析和數位連接的進步，也進一步推動了該領域在整個本地物流生態系統中的成長。

市佔率最大的地區：

在預測期內，北美預計將佔據最大的市場佔有率，這得益於其成熟的電子商務基礎設施、都市區高密度的配送網路以及強大的技術供應商網路。美國在該領域處於領先地位，亞馬遜、UPS、聯邦快遞和Instacart等公司經營龐大的配送網路。創業投資正在支持物流技術的創新。地方政府正在智慧城市計畫中試行共用配送基礎設施。企業永續發展措施也促使人們對大都會圈的綜合物流模式產生濃厚興趣。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

在預測期內，亞太地區預計將呈現最高的複合年成長率，這主要得益於電子商務的快速成長、高都市區密度以及政府主導的物流現代化項目。在中國，京東物流和順豐速運憑藉其先進的協同平台部署，在該地區處於領先地位。在印度，數位商務的擴張催生了對共用最後一公里解決方案的需求。在東南亞市場，群眾外包配送模式的採用正在迅速推進。政府對智慧城市的投資正在支持全部區域的協同配送網路。

免費客製化服務：

所有購買此報告的客戶均可享受以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 企業概況
    • 對其他市場參與者（最多 3 家公司）進行全面分析
    • 對主要公司進行SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域細分
    • 根據客戶要求，我們可以提供主要國家的市場估算和預測，以及複合年成長率（註：需經可行性確認）。
  • 競爭性標竿分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理覆蓋範圍和策略聯盟對領先公司進行基準分析。

目錄

第1章：執行摘要

  • 市場概覽及主要亮點
  • 促進因素、挑戰與機遇
  • 競爭格局概述
  • 戰略洞察與建議

第2章：研究框架

  • 研究目標和範圍
  • 相關人員分析
  • 研究假設和限制
  • 調查方法

第3章 市場動態與趨勢分析

  • 市場定義與結構
  • 主要市場促進因素
  • 市場限制與挑戰
  • 投資成長機會和重點領域
  • 產業威脅與風險評估
  • 技術與創新展望
  • 新興市場/高成長市場
  • 監管和政策環境
  • 新冠疫情的影響及復甦前景

第4章：競爭環境與策略評估

  • 波特五力分析
    • 供應商的議價能力
    • 買方的議價能力
    • 替代品的威脅
    • 新進入者的威脅
    • 競爭公司之間的競爭
  • 主要公司市佔率分析
  • 產品基準評效和效能比較

第5章：全球社區物流協調市場：依服務類型分類

  • 聯合交付/配送
  • 群眾外包物流
  • 微型倉配網路
  • 退貨和逆向物流
  • 都市區貨運整合
  • 最後一公里共乘

第6章：全球社區物流協調市場：依平台類型分類

  • 運輸管理系統
  • 倉庫管理系統
  • 路線最佳化平台
  • 即時視覺化平台
  • 雲端物流應用

第7章：全球社區物流協調市場：依服務模式分類

  • 專用車輛
  • 群眾外包或零工經濟
  • 混合

第8章：全球社區物流協調市場：依車輛類型分類

  • 廂型車和輕型卡車
  • 二輪車和三輪車
  • 貨運自行車
  • 自動送貨機器人
  • 無人機

第9章：全球社區物流協調市場：依技術分類

  • 人工智慧驅動的路線最佳化
  • 聖經艦隊遠端資訊處理
  • 利用區塊鏈技術確保貨物完整性
  • 預測分析
  • 行動身份驗證

第10章：全球社區物流協調市場：以最終用戶分類

  • 電子商務與零售
  • 食品和日用品宅配
  • 醫療和製藥
  • 第三方物流供應商
  • 地方政府官員和城市規劃負責人
  • 小型企業

第11章 全球社區物流協調市場：按地區分類

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 英國
    • 德國
    • 法國
    • 義大利
    • 西班牙
    • 荷蘭
    • 比利時
    • 瑞典
    • 瑞士
    • 波蘭
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 中國
    • 日本
    • 印度
    • 韓國
    • 澳洲
    • 印尼
    • 泰國
    • 馬來西亞
    • 新加坡
    • 越南
    • 其他亞太國家
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 哥倫比亞
    • 智利
    • 秘魯
    • 其他南美國家
  • 世界其他地區（RoW）
    • 中東
      • 沙烏地阿拉伯
      • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
      • 卡達
      • 以色列
      • 其他中東國家
    • 非洲
      • 南非
      • 埃及
      • 摩洛哥
      • 其他非洲國家

第12章 策略市場資訊

  • 工業價值網路和供應鏈評估
  • 空白區域和機會地圖
  • 產品演進與市場生命週期分析
  • 通路、經銷商和打入市場策略的評估

第13章 產業趨勢與策略舉措

  • 併購
  • 夥伴關係、聯盟和合資企業
  • 新產品發布和認證
  • 擴大生產能力和投資
  • 其他策略舉措

第14章：公司簡介

  • UPS Inc.
  • FedEx Corporation
  • DHL Group
  • XPO Inc.
  • JD Logistics Inc.
  • SF Express Co. Ltd.
  • Amazon Logistics
  • Instacart Inc.
  • DoorDash Inc.
  • Uber Freight
  • Project44 Inc.
  • FourKites Inc.
  • Bringg Delivery Technologies Ltd.
  • FarEye Technologies Inc.
  • Onfleet Inc.
  • LogiNext Solutions
  • Locus.sh
Product Code: SMRC37548

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Community Logistics Coordination Market is accounted for $18.5 billion in 2026 and is expected to reach $52.8 billion by 2034 growing at a CAGR of 14.0% during the forecast period. Community logistics coordination refers to collaborative systems that optimize the movement, storage, and distribution of goods within localized urban networks through shared infrastructure and coordinated operations. These platforms integrate retailers, carriers, gig workers, and municipal authorities into unified coordination frameworks. The technology encompasses transportation management systems, warehouse platforms, route optimization algorithms, real-time visibility tools, and crowdshipping applications leveraging artificial intelligence and sensor networks. Community logistics coordination serves e-commerce retailers, food delivery services, healthcare distributors, and urban planning authorities seeking to reduce congestion and improve delivery efficiency.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

E-commerce delivery surge

The explosive growth in online retail and same-day delivery expectations is driving substantial demand for community logistics coordination solutions. Urban last-mile delivery volumes have increased dramatically, straining traditional carrier networks. Consumers expect faster, more flexible delivery windows that require coordinated multi-party logistics. Retailers seek to reduce delivery costs through shared distribution networks and consolidated routes. Municipal governments support collaborative logistics as congestion and emissions reduction strategies.

Restraint:

Stakeholder alignment complexity

Coordinating multiple competing logistics stakeholders within shared community frameworks presents significant operational challenges for platform providers. Retailers, carriers, and gig workers have conflicting priorities regarding delivery speed, cost, and service quality. Data sharing between competitors raises antitrust and confidentiality concerns that limit transparency. Revenue allocation models for shared infrastructure investments remain contentious among participants. The complexity of multi-party contracts and liability frameworks slows platform adoption and network expansion.

Opportunity:

Micro-fulfillment networks

The deployment of community-coordinated micro-fulfillment centers within urban neighborhoods represents a transformative growth opportunity for logistics platforms. Small automated warehouses positioned near residential clusters enable rapid order preparation and handoff. Shared micro-fulfillment infrastructure reduces individual retailer capital requirements while improving delivery speed. Integration with existing retail stores and dark kitchens creates flexible fulfillment networks. Community coordination optimizes inventory placement and replenishment across multiple merchants simultaneously.

Threat:

Carrier consolidation pressure

The ongoing consolidation of global logistics carriers threatens the viability of community coordination models that depend on multi-carrier participation. Large carriers increasingly build proprietary last-mile networks that bypass shared coordination platforms entirely. Vertical integration by Amazon and major retailers reduces third-party coordination needs significantly. Carrier pricing power increases as market concentration grows. The dominance of established logistics networks constrains the addressable market for community coordination alternatives.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically accelerated community logistics coordination as delivery volumes surged beyond traditional carrier capacity. Lockdowns necessitated the rapid deployment of crowdsourced delivery networks and shared distribution infrastructure. Contactless delivery protocols required coordination between retailers, carriers, and consumers. Post-pandemic, elevated e-commerce volumes sustained demand for collaborative logistics. The crisis demonstrated the value of flexible, multi-party coordination during supply chain disruptions.

The Shared Delivery and Distribution segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The Shared Delivery and Distribution segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to the fundamental need for consolidated last-mile operations in dense urban environments. Shared models reduce redundant delivery vehicle trips and associated emissions. Retailers achieve cost savings through route consolidation and shared warehouse space. Municipal governments support shared delivery as congestion management initiatives. The segment benefits from established carrier relationships and proven operational models.

The transportation management systems segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the transportation management systems segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, driven by the increasing need for efficient coordination of community-based logistics networks and last-mile delivery operations. Rising urbanization, growing demand for real-time shipment visibility, and the expansion of shared transportation resources are accelerating adoption. These systems enable route optimization, fleet tracking, and resource allocation, improving operational efficiency and reducing delivery costs. Additionally, advancements in cloud-based platforms, AI-driven analytics, and digital connectivity are further supporting segment growth across community logistics ecosystems.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share, due to mature e-commerce infrastructure, high urban delivery density, and strong technology vendor presence. The United States leads with Amazon, UPS, FedEx, and Instacart operating extensive delivery networks. Venture capital funding supports logistics technology innovation. Municipal smart city initiatives pilot shared delivery infrastructure. Corporate sustainability commitments drive interest in consolidated logistics models across metropolitan areas.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, driven by rapid e-commerce growth, urban density, and government logistics modernization programs. China leads with JD Logistics and SF Express deploying advanced coordination platforms. India's expanding digital commerce creates demand for shared last-mile solutions. Southeast Asian markets demonstrate strong adoption of crowdsourced delivery models. Government investments in smart cities support coordinated distribution networks throughout the region.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Community Logistics Coordination Market include UPS Inc., FedEx Corporation, DHL Group, XPO Inc., JD Logistics Inc., SF Express Co. Ltd., Amazon Logistics, Instacart Inc., DoorDash Inc., Uber Freight, Project44 Inc., FourKites Inc., Bringg Delivery Technologies Ltd., FarEye Technologies Inc., Onfleet Inc., LogiNext Solutions and Locus.sh.

Key Developments:

In May 2026, Amazon Logistics launched a community logistics coordination hub in major metropolitan areas, enabling third-party sellers to share delivery infrastructure, warehousing, and route optimization with Amazon's proprietary network capabilities.

In April 2026, UPS Inc. introduced a shared urban delivery network allowing competing retailers to consolidate last-mile routes through UPS coordination centers, reducing individual delivery costs by thirty percent across markets.

In March 2026, DoorDash Inc. expanded its community logistics platform to include non-food retail deliveries, leveraging existing driver networks for same-day e-commerce fulfillment across grocery, pharmacy, and general merchandise categories nationwide.

Service Types Covered:

  • Shared Delivery and Distribution
  • Crowdsourced Logistics
  • Micro-Fulfillment Networks
  • Returns and Reverse Logistics
  • Urban Freight Consolidation
  • Last-Mile Pooling

Platform Types Covered:

  • Transportation Management Systems
  • Warehouse Management Systems
  • Route Optimization Platforms
  • Real-Time Visibility Platforms
  • Crowdshipping Apps

Delivery Models Covered:

  • Dedicated Fleet
  • Crowdsourced or Gig
  • Hybrid

Vehicles Covered:

  • Vans and Light Trucks
  • Two-Wheelers and Three-Wheelers
  • Cargo Bikes
  • Autonomous Delivery Bots
  • Drones

Technologies Covered:

  • AI-Based Route Optimization
  • IoT Fleet Telematics
  • Blockchain for Shipment Integrity
  • Predictive Analytics
  • Mobile Identity Verification

End Users Covered:

  • E-commerce and Retail
  • Food and Grocery Delivery
  • Healthcare and Pharma
  • Third-Party Logistics Providers
  • Municipalities and Urban Planners
  • Small and Medium Enterprises

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • United Kingdom
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Netherlands
    • Belgium
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • Poland
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Indonesia
    • Thailand
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • Vietnam
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
    • Chile
    • Peru
    • Rest of South America
  • Rest of the World (RoW)
    • Middle East
  • Saudi Arabia
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Qatar
  • Israel
  • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
  • South Africa
  • Egypt
  • Morocco
  • Rest of Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2030, 2032 and 2034
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Snapshot and Key Highlights
  • 1.2 Growth Drivers, Challenges, and Opportunities
  • 1.3 Competitive Landscape Overview
  • 1.4 Strategic Insights and Recommendations

2 Research Framework

  • 2.1 Study Objectives and Scope
  • 2.2 Stakeholder Analysis
  • 2.3 Research Assumptions and Limitations
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Collection (Primary and Secondary)
    • 2.4.2 Data Modeling and Estimation Techniques
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation and Triangulation
    • 2.4.4 Analytical and Forecasting Approach

3 Market Dynamics and Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Market Definition and Structure
  • 3.2 Key Market Drivers
  • 3.3 Market Restraints and Challenges
  • 3.4 Growth Opportunities and Investment Hotspots
  • 3.5 Industry Threats and Risk Assessment
  • 3.6 Technology and Innovation Landscape
  • 3.7 Emerging and High-Growth Markets
  • 3.8 Regulatory and Policy Environment
  • 3.9 Impact of COVID-19 and Recovery Outlook

4 Competitive and Strategic Assessment

  • 4.1 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.1.1 Supplier Bargaining Power
    • 4.1.2 Buyer Bargaining Power
    • 4.1.3 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.1.4 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.1.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.2 Market Share Analysis of Key Players
  • 4.3 Product Benchmarking and Performance Comparison

5 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Service Type

  • 5.1 Shared Delivery and Distribution
  • 5.2 Crowdsourced Logistics
  • 5.3 Micro-Fulfillment Networks
  • 5.4 Returns and Reverse Logistics
  • 5.5 Urban Freight Consolidation
  • 5.6 Last-Mile Pooling

6 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Platform Type

  • 6.1 Transportation Management Systems
  • 6.2 Warehouse Management Systems
  • 6.3 Route Optimization Platforms
  • 6.4 Real-Time Visibility Platforms
  • 6.5 Crowdshipping Apps

7 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Delivery Model

  • 7.1 Dedicated Fleet
  • 7.2 Crowdsourced or Gig
  • 7.3 Hybrid

8 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Vehicle

  • 8.1 Vans and Light Trucks
  • 8.2 Two-Wheelers and Three-Wheelers
  • 8.3 Cargo Bikes
  • 8.4 Autonomous Delivery Bots
  • 8.5 Drones

9 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Technology

  • 9.1 AI-Based Route Optimization
  • 9.2 IoT Fleet Telematics
  • 9.3 Blockchain for Shipment Integrity
  • 9.4 Predictive Analytics
  • 9.5 Mobile Identity Verification

10 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By End User

  • 10.1 E-commerce and Retail
  • 10.2 Food and Grocery Delivery
  • 10.3 Healthcare and Pharma
  • 10.4 Third-Party Logistics Providers
  • 10.5 Municipalities and Urban Planners
  • 10.6 Small and Medium Enterprises

11 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 North America
    • 11.1.1 United States
    • 11.1.2 Canada
    • 11.1.3 Mexico
  • 11.2 Europe
    • 11.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 11.2.2 Germany
    • 11.2.3 France
    • 11.2.4 Italy
    • 11.2.5 Spain
    • 11.2.6 Netherlands
    • 11.2.7 Belgium
    • 11.2.8 Sweden
    • 11.2.9 Switzerland
    • 11.2.10 Poland
    • 11.2.11 Rest of Europe
  • 11.3 Asia Pacific
    • 11.3.1 China
    • 11.3.2 Japan
    • 11.3.3 India
    • 11.3.4 South Korea
    • 11.3.5 Australia
    • 11.3.6 Indonesia
    • 11.3.7 Thailand
    • 11.3.8 Malaysia
    • 11.3.9 Singapore
    • 11.3.10 Vietnam
    • 11.3.11 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.4 South America
    • 11.4.1 Brazil
    • 11.4.2 Argentina
    • 11.4.3 Colombia
    • 11.4.4 Chile
    • 11.4.5 Peru
    • 11.4.6 Rest of South America
  • 11.5 Rest of the World (RoW)
    • 11.5.1 Middle East
      • 11.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 11.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 11.5.1.3 Qatar
      • 11.5.1.4 Israel
      • 11.5.1.5 Rest of Middle East
    • 11.5.2 Africa
      • 11.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 11.5.2.2 Egypt
      • 11.5.2.3 Morocco
      • 11.5.2.4 Rest of Africa

12 Strategic Market Intelligence

  • 12.1 Industry Value Network and Supply Chain Assessment
  • 12.2 White-Space and Opportunity Mapping
  • 12.3 Product Evolution and Market Life Cycle Analysis
  • 12.4 Channel, Distributor, and Go-to-Market Assessment

13 Industry Developments and Strategic Initiatives

  • 13.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
  • 13.2 Partnerships, Alliances, and Joint Ventures
  • 13.3 New Product Launches and Certifications
  • 13.4 Capacity Expansion and Investments
  • 13.5 Other Strategic Initiatives

14 Company Profiles

  • 14.1 UPS Inc.
  • 14.2 FedEx Corporation
  • 14.3 DHL Group
  • 14.4 XPO Inc.
  • 14.5 JD Logistics Inc.
  • 14.6 SF Express Co. Ltd.
  • 14.7 Amazon Logistics
  • 14.8 Instacart Inc.
  • 14.9 DoorDash Inc.
  • 14.10 Uber Freight
  • 14.11 Project44 Inc.
  • 14.12 FourKites Inc.
  • 14.13 Bringg Delivery Technologies Ltd.
  • 14.14 FarEye Technologies Inc.
  • 14.15 Onfleet Inc.
  • 14.16 LogiNext Solutions
  • 14.17 Locus.sh

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Region (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Service Type (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Shared Delivery and Distribution (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Crowdsourced Logistics (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Micro-Fulfillment Networks (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Returns and Reverse Logistics (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Urban Freight Consolidation (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Last-Mile Pooling (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Platform Type (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Transportation Management Systems (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Warehouse Management Systems (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Route Optimization Platforms (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Real-Time Visibility Platforms (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Crowdshipping Apps (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Delivery Model (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Dedicated Fleet (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Crowdsourced or Gig (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Hybrid (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Vehicle (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Vans and Light Trucks (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Two-Wheelers and Three-Wheelers (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Cargo Bikes (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Autonomous Delivery Bots (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Drones (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Technology (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By AI-Based Route Optimization (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By IoT Fleet Telematics (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Blockchain for Shipment Integrity (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Predictive Analytics (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Mobile Identity Verification (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By End User (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By E-commerce and Retail (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Food and Grocery Delivery (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 34 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Healthcare and Pharma (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 35 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Third-Party Logistics Providers (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 36 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Municipalities and Urban Planners (2023-2034) ($MN)
  • Table 37 Global Community Logistics Coordination Market Outlook, By Small and Medium Enterprises (2023-2034) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Rest of the World (RoW) Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.