封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1878114

T細胞免疫療法市場-2025年至2030年預測

T-Cell Immunotherapy Market - Forecasts from 2025 to 2030

出版日期: | 出版商: Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence | 英文 142 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

T 細胞免疫療法市場預計將從 2025 年的 62.77 億美元成長到 2030 年的 107.23 億美元,複合年成長率為 11.30%。

T細胞免疫療法市場目前正經歷重大轉型。基因改造的、自主研發的藥物,主要是基於CAR-T和TCR的治療方法,正從小眾的挽救性療法轉向癌症治療的早期階段。這一轉變的特點是市場瓶頸從早期臨床概念驗證轉向了可靠及時的生產以及確保醫保支付方持續提供藥物的挑戰。目前,市場的發展軌跡正受到一系列監管措施、策略性產能投資以及持續改進的生產流程的直接影響,這些因素共同改變了臨床中心、生產商和服務供應商的需求動態。

市場成長要素

市場擴張的關鍵促進因素是新適應症的持續監管核准。這些核准系統性地增加了符合條件的患者數量,將先前未被滿足的醫療需求轉化為商業性價值的患者群體。特別是,基於TCR的療法在固體癌的核准,正在開闢腫瘤學的新天地,從而即時且持續地催生對相關生產能力、伴隨診斷和專業輸注服務的需求。

擴大商業化生產規模也是關鍵的成長要素。策略性的生產能力和供應協議對於將潛在的臨床需求轉化為可行的治療方案至關重要。這些協議直接擴大了患者容量,進而增加了對整個治療過程中輔助服務的需求,例如血液分離術物流、其他物流以及必要的住院護理。

此外,持續改善流程以縮短生產前置作業時間(TAT)對轉換率有直接的正面影響。縮短TAT可提高產品交付時仍合格輸注臨床條件的轉診病患比例。這種營運效率的提升直接提高了患者轉診轉化為成功治療的轉換率,最大限度地效用了現有的生產和臨床能力。

市場挑戰與策略機遇

市場面臨幾個重大限制因素:由於無塵室可用性、病毒載體供應以及自體工作流程固有的複雜性等因素,生產能力持續不匹配,限制了可同時進行的治療數量,當預期週轉時間超過患者的臨床治療窗口時,就會限制實際需求。

此外,細胞激素釋放症候群 (CRS) 和免疫效應細胞相關神經毒性症候群 (ICANS) 等特殊毒性的管理需要專門的住院資源,這迫使不具備這些先進能力的治療中心將患者轉診至專門的機構,從而可能導致需求的地域集中和獲取資源的差異。

這些挑戰也伴隨著巨大的機會。支持早期使用T細胞療法的真實世界數據和臨床數據的積累,顯著擴大了合格的患者群體。加之支付方對早期使用的接受度不斷提高,推動了每位患者的需求成長。另一個機會在於監管政策的轉變,允許門診治療,這將使更多醫院能夠提供這些複雜的療法,從而大幅提升潛在的本地需求。

供應鍊和監管環境

T細胞免疫療法供應鏈是一個涉及多個環節的全球性運作。本土產品需要本地白血球分離術採集、區域物流配送至集中式製造地,以及最終運回輸液中心。主要生產基地集中在北美和部分歐洲、中東和非洲地區。物流複雜性和灌裝表面處理工程的排程安排是此供應鏈中反覆出現的瓶頸。策略性產能協議和流程改善能夠直接緩解這些限制,從而實現更高的市場需求。

法規環境是影響市場格局的關鍵因素。在美國,FDA的加速核准流程加快了產品進入市場的速度,但持續的適應症往往取決於驗證性研究的結果。這雖然會提升短期需求,但要實現持續應用,則需要大量的上市後證據。在歐盟,集中核准的先進治療藥品(ATMP)允許產品進入單一市場,但需要提交詳細的比較生產數據。在中國,本地核准和不斷成長的國內生產能力正透過減少對跨境物流的依賴,日益影響區域需求。

詳細細分市場分析

TCR(T細胞受體)療法領域尤其重要,因為它開拓了CAR-T療法先前無法觸及的固態腫瘤治療領域。 TCR療法透過針對HLA分子呈現的細胞內抗原,為某些固態腫瘤創造了商業性價值的患者群體。該領域的需求受診斷篩檢率、HLA匹配患者的普遍性以及支付方對昂貴的單劑量療法的接受度等因素驅動。這些產品的商業性成功往往伴隨著上市後驗證要求,這可能會抑制最初的市場需求。持續的臨床效益取決於能否證明其具有持續的療效。

醫院和專科治療中心是主要的需求安全隔離網閘。它們的容量取決於訓練有素的醫護人員、加護治療資源以及與血液分離和生產供應商之間無縫銜接的物流網路,這些因素直接影響著轉診患者轉化為實際接受治療的患者。投資建造專門的細胞治療單元和開發門診輸注通訊協定對於提高治療量至關重要,而治療量的提高反過來又會推動當地市場對生產位和配套服務的需求。

競爭環境

大型製藥和生技公司主導著競爭格局,每家公司都有其獨特的策略重點。 Adaptimmune 將自身定位為 TCR 商業化的先驅,其策略重點是拓展其診斷賦能的標靶化治療和固體癌產品線。吉利德/Kite 專注於生產規模和網路最佳化,並利用監管流程最佳化來縮短週轉時間,推動產品盡早上市。百時美施貴寶則透過策略性生產夥伴關係,利用其產品組合的垂直整合來確保供應並擴大患者用藥範圍。該市場的特點是,擁有強大的生產能力、豐富的監管經驗以及應對複雜醫保環境能力的公司更受青睞。

本報告的主要優勢:

  • 深入分析:提供對主要和新興地區的深入市場洞察,重點關注客戶群、政府政策和社會經濟因素、消費者偏好、行業垂直領域和其他細分市場。
  • 競爭格局:了解全球主要企業的策略舉措,並了解透過正確的策略進入市場的可能性。
  • 市場促進因素與未來趨勢:探討影響市場的動態因素和關鍵趨勢及其對未來市場發展的影響。
  • 可操作的建議:利用這些見解,在動態環境中做出策略決策,並開拓新的商機和收入來源。
  • 受眾廣泛:對Start-Ups、研究機構、顧問公司、中小企業和大型企業都很有用且經濟實惠。

企業使用我們的報告的目的是什麼?

產業與市場分析、機會評估、產品需求預測、打入市場策略、地理擴張、資本投資決策、法規結構及影響、新產品開發、競爭情報

報告範圍:

  • 2022年至2024年的歷史數據和2025年至2030年的預測數據
  • 成長機會、挑戰、供應鏈前景、法規結構與趨勢分析
  • 競爭定位、策略和市場佔有率分析
  • 按業務板塊和地區分類的收入成長和預測評估,包括國家/地區
  • 公司概況(策略、產品、財務資訊、關鍵發展等)

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 市場概覽

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章 4. 市場區隔

第3章 商業情境

  • 市場促進因素
  • 市場限制
  • 市場機遇
  • 波特五力分析
  • 產業價值鏈分析
  • 政策與法規
  • 策略建議

第4章 技術展望

第5章 T細胞免疫療法市場(按類型分類)

  • 介紹
  • 嵌合體抗原受體(CARs)
  • T細胞受體(TCR)
  • 腫瘤浸潤淋巴細胞(TILs)

第6章:依適應症分類的T細胞免疫療法市場

  • 介紹
  • 黑色素瘤
  • 白血病
  • 卵巢癌
  • 其他

第7章 T細胞免疫療法市場:按地區分類

  • 介紹
  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 其他
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 法國
    • 英國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 其他
  • 亞太地區
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韓國
    • 印尼
    • 泰國
    • 其他

第8章 競爭格局與分析

  • 主要企業和策略分析
  • 市佔率分析
  • 合併、收購、協議和合作
  • 競爭對手儀錶板

第9章:公司簡介

  • Cellular Biomedicine Group
  • Autolus Novartis
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  • Adaptimmune Therapeutics
  • Cellectis
  • Bluebird bio
  • Immunocore
  • Innovative Cellular Therapeutics
  • Iovance Biotherapeutics
  • Celgene

第10章附錄

  • 貨幣
  • 先決條件
  • 基準年和預測年時間表
  • 相關人員的主要收益
  • 調查方法
  • 簡稱
簡介目錄
Product Code: KSI061612063

T-Cell Immunotherapy Market is projected to reach USD 10.723 billion by 2030 from USD 6.277 billion in 2025, with a 11.30% CAGR.

The T-cell immunotherapy market is undergoing a significant transition, moving engineered autologous products, principally CAR-T and TCR-based therapies, from niche salvage treatments toward earlier lines of oncology care. This evolution is characterized by a shift in market bottlenecks away from initial clinical proof-of-concept and toward the challenges of reliable, timely production and securing consistent payer access. The market's trajectory is now directly shaped by discrete regulatory actions, strategic capacity investments, and continuous manufacturing process improvements, which collectively alter demand dynamics for clinical centers, manufacturers, and service providers.

Market Growth Drivers

A primary driver of market expansion is the continued regulatory approval of new indications. These approvals systematically increase the count of eligible patients, converting previously unmet medical needs into commercially addressable cohorts. Notably, approvals for TCR-based therapies in solid tumors have opened new segments of oncology, generating immediate and sustained demand for associated manufacturing slots, companion diagnostics, and specialized infusion capacity.

The scaling of commercial manufacturing represents another critical growth driver. Strategic capacity reservation and supply agreements are essential for converting latent clinical demand into executable treatments. These agreements directly unlock patient throughput, which in turn increases demand for peripheral services across the treatment journey, including apheresis scheduling, logistics, and necessary inpatient care.

Furthermore, ongoing process improvements that shorten the manufacturing turnaround time (TAT) are having a direct and positive impact on conversion rates. A reduced TAT increases the fraction of referred patients who remain clinically eligible for infusion at the time of product delivery. This operational efficiency directly raises the conversion of patient referrals into successfully treated individuals, maximizing the utility of existing manufacturing and clinical capacity.

Market Challenges and Strategic Opportunities

The market faces several significant constraints. A persistent manufacturing capacity mismatch, driven by limitations in clean-room availability, viral vector supply, and the inherent complexity of autologous workflows, caps the number of concurrent treatments that can be administered. This suppresses realized demand when expected turnaround times exceed the clinical windows of opportunity for patients.

Additionally, the management of unique toxicities such as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) requires specialized inpatient resources. Treatment centers lacking these advanced capabilities must refer patients to specialized hubs, which geographically concentrates demand and can create access disparities.

These challenges are counterbalanced by substantial opportunities. The accumulation of real-world and clinical data supporting the use of T-cell therapies in earlier lines of treatment is making a significantly larger patient population eligible. This is coupled with increasing payer acceptance for earlier use, which raises demand per patient incidence. Another opportunity lies in regulatory shifts that enable outpatient administration, which can materially increase latent regional demand by allowing a broader range of hospitals to deliver these complex therapies.

Supply Chain and Regulatory Landscape

The T-cell immunotherapy supply chain is a multi-node, global operation. Autologous products require localized leukapheresis, controlled regional logistics to centralized manufacturing hubs, and final return shipment to the infusion center. Key production hubs remain concentrated in North America and selected EMEA locations. Within this chain, logistical complexity and fill/finish scheduling are recurring bottlenecks; strategic capacity agreements and process improvements directly relieve these constraints, enabling higher realized demand.

The regulatory environment is a key market shaper. In the United States, the FDA's accelerated approval pathways enable rapid market entry while often conditioning continued indication on confirmatory trial outcomes. This increases near-term demand but places a strong emphasis on post-market evidence generation for sustained uptake. In the European Union, the centralized ATMP (Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product) authorization provides single market access but requires detailed manufacturing comparability data. In China, local approvals and the growth of domestic manufacturing capability are increasingly influencing regional demand by reducing dependence on cross-border logistics.

In-Depth Segment Analysis

The segment for TCR (T-cell receptor) therapies is of particular importance as it opens segments of solid-tumor oncology previously inaccessible to CAR-T constructs. By targeting intracellular antigens presented on HLA molecules, TCR therapies have created commercially addressable cohorts for specific solid tumors. Demand in this segment is driven by diagnostic screening rates, the prevalence of HLA-eligible patients, and payer acceptance of high-cost, single-dose therapies. The commercial success of these products often involves post-market confirmatory requirements, which can front-load initial demand; sustained uptake is dependent on the demonstration of durable clinical benefit.

Hospitals and specialized treatment centers act as the primary demand gatekeepers. Their capacity-defined by the availability of trained staff, critical-care resources, and seamless logistical integration with apheresis and manufacturing providers-directly governs the conversion of referral volume into treated patients. Investments in dedicated cell therapy units and the development of outpatient infusion protocols are critical for increasing throughput, which in turn drives local market demand for manufacturing slots and supportive services.

Competitive Environment

The competitive landscape is defined by major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, each with distinct strategic focuses. Adaptimmune has positioned itself as a first mover in TCR commercialization, with a strategic emphasis on diagnostics-enabled targeting and expanding its solid-tumor pipeline. Gilead/Kite focuses on manufacturing scale and network optimization, leveraging regulatory process optimizations to shorten TAT and drive earlier-line adoption. Bristol Myers Squibb utilizes vertical integration across its portfolio and engages in strategic manufacturing partnerships to secure supply and broaden patient access. The market is characterized by a preference for players with robust manufacturing capabilities, regulatory expertise, and the ability to navigate complex reimbursement landscapes.

Key Benefits of this Report:

  • Insightful Analysis: Gain detailed market insights covering major as well as emerging geographical regions, focusing on customer segments, government policies and socio-economic factors, consumer preferences, industry verticals, and other sub-segments.
  • Competitive Landscape: Understand the strategic maneuvers employed by key players globally to understand possible market penetration with the correct strategy.
  • Market Drivers & Future Trends: Explore the dynamic factors and pivotal market trends and how they will shape future market developments.
  • Actionable Recommendations: Utilize the insights to exercise strategic decisions to uncover new business streams and revenues in a dynamic environment.
  • Caters to a Wide Audience: Beneficial and cost-effective for startups, research institutions, consultants, SMEs, and large enterprises.

What do businesses use our reports for?

Industry and Market Insights, Opportunity Assessment, Product Demand Forecasting, Market Entry Strategy, Geographical Expansion, Capital Investment Decisions, Regulatory Framework & Implications, New Product Development, Competitive Intelligence

Report Coverage:

  • Historical data from 2022 to 2024 & forecast data from 2025 to 2030
  • Growth Opportunities, Challenges, Supply Chain Outlook, Regulatory Framework, and Trend Analysis
  • Competitive Positioning, Strategies, and Market Share Analysis
  • Revenue Growth and Forecast Assessment of segments and regions including countries
  • Company Profiling (Strategies, Products, Financial Information, and Key Developments among others.

Segmentation

  • T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY TYPE
  • Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)
  • T-cell receptor (TCR)
  • Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)
  • T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY INDICATION
  • Melanoma
  • Leukemia
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Others
  • T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY GEOGRAPHY
  • North America
  • USA
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Others
  • Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Others
  • Middle East and Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Others
  • Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Indonesia
  • Thailand
  • Others

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. MARKET SNAPSHOT

  • 2.1. Market Overview
  • 2.2. Market Definition
  • 2.3. Scope of the Study

2.4. Market Segmentation

3. BUSINESS LANDSCAPE

  • 3.1. Market Drivers
  • 3.2. Market Restraints
  • 3.3. Market Opportunities
  • 3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 3.5. Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 3.6. Policies and Regulations
  • 3.7. Strategic Recommendations

4. TECHNOLOGICAL OUTLOOK

5. T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY TYPE

  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)
  • 5.3. T-cell receptor (TCR)
  • 5.4. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)

6. T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY INDICATION

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Melanoma
  • 6.3. Leukemia
  • 6.4. Ovarian cancer
  • 6.5. Others

7. T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKET BY GEOGRAPHY

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. North America
    • 7.2.1. USA
    • 7.2.2. Canada
    • 7.2.3. Mexico
  • 7.3. South America
    • 7.3.1. Brazil
    • 7.3.2. Argentina
    • 7.3.3. Others
  • 7.4. Europe
    • 7.4.1. Germany
    • 7.4.2. France
    • 7.4.3. United Kingdom
    • 7.4.4. Spain
    • 7.4.5. Others
  • 7.5. Middle East and Africa
    • 7.5.1. Saudi Arabia
    • 7.5.2. UAE
    • 7.5.3. Others
  • 7.6. Asia Pacific
    • 7.6.1. China
    • 7.6.2. India
    • 7.6.3. Japan
    • 7.6.4. South Korea
    • 7.6.5. Indonesia
    • 7.6.6. Thailand
    • 7.6.7. Others

8. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS

  • 8.1. Major Players and Strategy Analysis
  • 8.2. Market Share Analysis
  • 8.3. Mergers, Acquisitions, Agreements, and Collaborations
  • 8.4. Competitive Dashboard

9. COMPANY PROFILES

  • 9.1. Cellular Biomedicine Group
  • 9.2. Autolus Novartis
  • 9.3. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  • 9.4. Adaptimmune Therapeutics
  • 9.5. Cellectis
  • 9.6. Bluebird bio
  • 9.7. Immunocore
  • 9.8. Innovative Cellular Therapeutics
  • 9.9. Iovance Biotherapeutics
  • 9.10. Celgene

10. APPENDIX

  • 10.1. Currency
  • 10.2. Assumptions
  • 10.3. Base and Forecast Years Timeline
  • 10.4. Key Benefits for the Stakeholders
  • 10.5. Research Methodology
  • 10.6. Abbreviations