查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1914419

半導體CMP拋光墊市場按類型、材質、應用和最終用戶分類 - 全球預測（2026-2032年）

Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market by Type, Material, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 198 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

2025 年半導體 CMP 拋光墊市場價值為 9.0356 億美元，預計到 2026 年將成長至 9.5799 億美元，複合年成長率為 6.87%，到 2032 年將達到 14.3867 億美元。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 9.0356億美元
預計年份：2026年 9.5799億美元
預測年份 2032 1,438,670,000 美元
複合年成長率 (%) 6.87%

隨著半導體節點的不斷改進，表面控制要求也日益提高，因此了解CMP拋光墊在晶圓平坦化和製程重複性方面發揮的關鍵作用至關重要。

化學機械拋光 (CMP) 拋光墊在現代半導體製造中發揮著至關重要的作用，支持全球在不斷縮小的光刻節點上實現平坦表面的努力。由於晶圓需要經過多次拋光步驟，因此拋光墊的機械輪廓、材料成分和表面形貌會顯著影響晶圓內部的均勻性、缺陷率和整體擁有成本。因此，工程師和製程負責人將拋光墊的選擇視為一個多維最佳化問題，需要在去除率穩定性、凹陷、腐蝕和拋光液相容性之間取得平衡。

拋光墊微結構、表面處理和供應鏈協作的進步如何重塑晶圓製造生態系統對化學機械拋光 (CMP) 性能的預期

近年來，CMP拋光墊技術和商業性格局的變革源於整個製造生態系統中技術壓力和營運重點的融合。首先，異質整合和先進封裝的發展趨勢增加了拋光的複雜性，迫使拋光墊製造商設計出具有更均勻微觀結構和更長使用壽命的表面。因此，製程工程師現在要求拋光墊能夠在長時間運作中保持更嚴格的去除率控制，同時減少顆粒的產生。

2025 年的關稅將使供應鏈多樣化，並影響墊認證實踐，從而導致重大的營運應對措施和策略採購轉變。

2025年實施的關稅政策變更和貿易措施對半導體耗材和設備（包括CMP拋光墊）產生了多方面的營運影響。影響原料、中間組件和某些成品的關稅迫使採購部門重新評估供應商組成和總到岸成本模型。事實上，各組織已透過加快雙源採購策略和驗證可在不同區域供應鏈網路中生產的替代拋光墊配方來應對這一變化。

一個嚴謹的細分框架，將焊盤類型、目標材料、裝置應用和最終用戶採購行為與技術和商業性促進因素聯繫起來。

精確的細分框架有助於技術領導者和採購團隊針對不同的製程環境選擇合適的化學機械拋光 (CMP) 拋光墊。按類型分類，拋光墊可分為傳統結構拋光墊和固定磨料拋光墊（磨料顆粒封裝在聚合物基體中）。每種類型在去除率穩定性、平面度控制和調理頻率方面各有優勢。考慮到目標材料的不同，拋光墊在拋光銅互連線、氧化物介質和鎢結構時表現出不同的特性，因此，拋光墊配方和表面形貌要求會根據目標材料對拋光液化學性質的機械和化學響應而變化。

區域採購、認證週期和支援模式會影響晶圓廠和供應商如何優先考慮焊盤性能、物流以及全球生產基地間的協同開發。

區域趨勢影響籌資策略、認證時間表以及對本地供應商生態系統的重視程度。在美洲，製造業投資和成熟的生產節點產能通常會催生對針對成熟製程平台最佳化的焊盤的需求，促使採購團隊在兼顧國內採購和全球供應商夥伴關係的同時，維持成本效益和技術支援。在歐洲、中東和非洲，法規環境和區域化的供應鏈網路影響認證流程，從而促進與能夠提供快速回應的技術服務和物流解決方案的本地供應商的合作。

決定CMP拋光墊生態系競爭優勢的因素包括：供應商技術服務、專有拋光墊微觀結構與協作開發模式

拋光墊供應商的競爭格局圍繞著技術差異化、現場支援能力以及能夠減少客戶認證流程阻力的夥伴關係。領先的供應商正在投資建設應用工程團隊，這些團隊與晶圓廠的製程工程師直接合作，根據特定的拋光液態化學成分和目標材料調整拋光墊的紋理、硬度分佈和孔隙結構。這些技術服務與產品性能一樣，越來越受到客戶的重視，因為它們可以縮短認證週期並降低推出風險。

為製程、採購和工程負責人提供切實可行的措施，以降低焊盤供應風險、延長耗材壽命、加快認證速度，同時確保產量比率。

產業領導者應採取整合策略，將焊盤認證、採購和製程管理結合，以加速節點升級並保障產量比率。首先，投資與多家供應商的聯合認證項目，以建立替代方案並減少對單一供應商的依賴。並行認證流程使晶圓廠能夠縮短產能推出週期，並在供應中斷的情況下保持生產連續性。其次，優先考慮具有延長焊盤壽命和減少顆粒物優勢的焊盤配方和處理技術，從而在不犧牲性能的前提下實現成本節約。

透過嚴謹的調查方法，結合與一級製造商的互動、對供應商工程師的訪談以及技術文獻的綜合分析，我們獲得了關於實用CMP拋光墊的寶貴見解。

本研究結合了與化學機械拋光（CMP）製程工程師、採購主管和供應商技術團隊的直接對話，以及對技術文獻、專利揭露和設備整合案例研究的系統性回顧，旨在全面了解拋光墊的動態特性。主要資訊收集著重於製程層面的效能指標（去除率控制、晶圓內均勻性、缺陷模式和保養週期），而供應商訪談則探討了生產可擴展性、品質系統和現場支援模式。這些定性資訊與工程研究和已發布的製造最佳實踐進行了交叉比對，以檢驗技術趨勢和新興材料的選擇。

技術和商業性優先事項的趨同要求，需要一種系統級的焊盤策略，以實現一致的平坦化、低缺陷率和更穩健的製造流程。

化學機械拋光（CMP）拋光墊是材料工程和半導體製造經濟的關鍵交會點，近期趨勢凸顯了技術和商業領域整合決策的必要性。拋光墊微結構技術和固定磨料選擇的進步為減少凹陷和提高均勻性提供了有希望的途徑，但這些必須與精密的拋光墊預處理技術和拋光液最佳化相結合。同時，採用柔軟性的區域籌資策略和與供應商建立合作關係，可以降低關稅風險和供應鏈中斷的風險。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 半導體CMP拋光墊市場按類型分類

  • 傳統墊
  • 固定式研磨墊

9. 半導體CMP拋光墊市場（依材料分類）

  • 銅
  • 氧化物
  • 鎢

10. 半導體CMP拋光墊市場（依應用領域分類）

  • 邏輯裝置
  • 儲存裝置
    • DRAM
    • NAND快閃記憶體

11. 半導體CMP拋光墊市場（依最終用戶分類）

  • 鑄造廠
  • IDM
  • OSAT

12. 半導體CMP拋光墊市場（依地區分類）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 半導體CMP拋光墊市場（依組別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各國半導體CMP拋光墊市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第15章：美國半導體CMP拋光墊市場

第16章 中國半導體CMP拋光墊市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • BASF SE
  • Cabot Microelectronics Corporation
  • Dow Inc.
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • Entegris, Inc.
  • Fujibo Co., Ltd.
  • Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Pureon AG
  • Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Thomas West Incorporated
  • Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
  • Tosoh Corporation
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13C68

The Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market was valued at USD 903.56 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 957.99 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.87%, reaching USD 1,438.67 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 903.56 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 957.99 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1,438.67 million
CAGR (%) 6.87%

Understanding the pivotal role of CMP polishing pads in wafer planarization and process reproducibility as semiconductor nodes demand tighter surface control

Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) polishing pads occupy a foundational role in modern semiconductor manufacturing by supporting global efforts to achieve planar surfaces at increasingly fine lithographic nodes. As wafers progress through multiple polishing steps, the pad's mechanical profile, material composition, and surface topography materially influence within-wafer uniformity, defectivity rates, and total cost of ownership. Engineers and process owners thus treat pad selection as a multidimensional optimization problem that balances removal rate stability against dishing, erosion, and slurry compatibility.

Over recent development cycles, polishing pad technologies have evolved to address the competing pressures of reduced feature sizes and heterogeneous integration. Fixed abrasive pads and conventional polymeric pads present distinct trade-offs between planarity control and consumable lifecycle. Meanwhile, tighter specifications for copper, oxide, and tungsten interconnect polishing have elevated the need for application-specific pad formulations and conditioning protocols. Consequently, pad performance now interlinks with slurry chemistry design, end-point detection systems, and automated conditioning systems, creating an ecosystem-level approach to CMP performance.

Given this context, stakeholders across foundries, integrated device manufacturers, and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers prioritize pad reliability, supplier technical support, and process reproducibility. These priorities reflect a broader industry preference for predictable process windows that minimize rework, maximize yield stability, and support accelerated node transitions.

How advances in pad microarchitecture, conditioning, and supply-chain collaboration are reshaping CMP performance expectations across wafer fabrication ecosystems

Recent transformative shifts in CMP polishing pad technology and commercial dynamics stem from converging technological pressures and operational priorities across fabrication ecosystems. First, the drive toward heterogeneous integration and advanced packaging has increased polishing complexity, motivating pad manufacturers to engineer surfaces with more consistent microstructure and improved conditioning lifecycles. As a result, process engineers now demand pads that deliver narrower variability in removal rates while reducing particle generation over extended runs.

Second, innovation in pad materials and fixed abrasive architectures has accelerated. Fixed abrasive pads, which embed abrasive particles within the pad matrix, have gained attention for certain metal and dielectric applications where localized control can reduce dishing and erosion. At the same time, refinements in conventional pad chemistry and pore structure aim to improve slurry transport and reduce entrapment risks, which mitigates defectivity. These material-level changes often occur in tandem with advanced conditioning equipment that preserves pad surface topography with more predictable conditioning cycles.

Third, supply-chain resilience and strategic sourcing have become core considerations for procurement and operations teams. The need to optimize inventory strategies and qualification timelines has pushed collaboration between pad suppliers and fabricators, with an emphasis on accelerated qualification protocols and in-situ monitoring to shorten ramp-up times. Collectively, these shifts highlight an industry moving from component-centric procurement to integrated process partnerships that prioritize long-term reproducibility and risk mitigation.

Consequential operational responses and strategic sourcing shifts driven by 2025 tariff measures that influenced supply-chain diversification and pad qualification practices

Tariff policy changes and trade measures implemented in 2025 introduced layered operational consequences for semiconductor consumables and equipment, including CMP polishing pads. Tariffs that affect raw materials, intermediate components, and certain finished goods forced procurement teams to re-evaluate supplier footprints and total landed cost models. In practice, organizations responded by accelerating dual-sourcing strategies and by qualifying alternative pad formulations that could be manufactured within different regional supply networks.

Beyond immediate sourcing reactions, tariff-driven cost pressure amplified focus on pad longevity and process efficiency. Process engineers increased scrutiny on pad conditioning cycles and defect mitigation practices to offset elevated input costs. Consequently, engineering teams prioritized process windows that reduced pad consumption per wafer and extended usable pad life while preserving planarity and defect control. This pragmatic response reflects a recognition that operational optimization can serve as a hedge against external tariff volatility.

Moreover, tariff impacts encouraged closer collaboration between consumable suppliers and end users to redesign packaging, adjust minimum order quantities, and locate finishing steps closer to fabrication hubs when feasible. These adjustments often required rework of qualification matrices and tighter coordination across supply-chain stakeholders. Collectively, the 2025 tariff environment catalyzed a shift toward more geographically diversified procurement and process adaptations intended to protect yield and support continuity of advanced-node manufacturing.

A rigorous segmentation framework that maps pad types, target materials, device applications, and end-user procurement behaviors to technical and commercial decision drivers

A precise segmentation framework helps technical leaders and procurement teams navigate CMP pad selection across distinct process contexts. When viewed by type, the landscape splits into conventional pad architectures and fixed abrasive pad designs that embed abrasive particles within a polymeric matrix; each path offers different advantages for removal-rate stability, planarity control, and conditioning frequency. Considering material targets emphasizes that pad behavior differs when polishing copper interconnects, oxide dielectrics, or tungsten features, and therefore pad formulation and surface topography requirements vary with the target material's mechanical and chemical response to slurry chemistries.

From an application perspective, pad selection depends on whether the primary focus is logic device fabrication or memory device production, with memory device polishing further differentiated by device class, including DRAM and NAND Flash, each of which imposes distinct tolerance and defectivity expectations. Finally, end-user segmentation clarifies commercial and qualification dynamics because foundries, integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers (OSATs) operate under differing procurement cycles, scale requirements, and qualification tolerances. Together, these segmentation lenses guide how process engineers prioritize pad performance, qualification timelines, and supplier partnerships to achieve consistent wafer-level outcomes.

Regional sourcing, qualification rhythms, and support models that influence how fabs and suppliers prioritize pad performance, logistics, and co-development across global production hubs

Regional dynamics shape sourcing strategies, qualification timelines, and the emphasis placed on local supplier ecosystems. In the Americas, fabrication investment and mature-node capacity often create demand for pads optimized for established process platforms, while procurement teams balance domestic sourcing with global supplier partnerships to preserve cost efficiency and technical support. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment and localized supply networks influence qualification pathways and encourage collaboration with regional suppliers who can provide responsive technical services and logistics solutions.

In Asia-Pacific, a dense concentration of advanced fabs and aggressive node transitions places a premium on pads that deliver repeatable performance at scale, alongside strong field support and rapid qualification cycles. This regional intensity also drives closer integration between pad manufacturers and fabs, with co-development projects and on-site support teams becoming common. Across regions, stakeholders increasingly consider the implications of logistics, lead-time variability, and regional tariff exposures when designing sourcing strategies, making geographic agility an essential component of resilient CMP supply planning.

How supplier technical services, proprietary pad microstructures, and collaborative development models define competitive advantage in the CMP polishing pad ecosystem

The competitive environment for polishing pad suppliers centers on technical differentiation, field support capabilities, and partnerships that reduce qualification friction for customers. Leading suppliers invest in application engineering teams that work directly with fab process engineers to adapt pad textures, hardness profiles, and pore structures to specific slurry chemistries and target materials. These technical services shorten qualification cycles and reduce ramp risk, which customers increasingly value alongside product-level performance.

Strategic partnerships and supply agreements now emphasize collaborative development, with suppliers offering joint problem-solving around conditioning strategies and in-situ monitoring to extend pad life and reduce defectivity. Intellectual property around pad microstructure design, fabrication processes, and conditioning tooling contributes to competitive advantage, as does the capacity to deliver consistent product quality at commercial volumes. Meanwhile, aftermarket services such as on-site training, rapid replacement logistics, and tailored performance analytics create additional differentiation, enabling suppliers to move beyond a transactional model toward long-term process stewardship.

Practical actions for process, procurement, and engineering leaders to de-risk pad supply, extend consumable life, and accelerate qualification while safeguarding yield

Industry leaders should adopt an integrated strategy that aligns pad qualification, procurement, and process control to accelerate node transitions while protecting yield. First, invest in joint qualification programs with multiple suppliers to establish fallback options and reduce single-source exposure. By running parallel qualification streams, fabs can shorten ramp cycles and maintain continuity if supply disruptions occur. Second, prioritize pad formulations and conditioning regimes that demonstrably extend usable pad life and reduce particle generation, enabling cost mitigation without sacrificing performance.

Third, deepen technical partnerships with suppliers by co-developing pad surface microstructures and conditioning protocols that match slurry chemistries to specific copper, oxide, or tungsten processes. This co-engineering approach reduces rework and improves first-pass yields. Fourth, align procurement practices with regional logistics realities to mitigate tariff and lead-time risks; consider localized finishing or assembly steps to limit cross-border exposure. Finally, establish measurable KPIs around within-wafer uniformity, defectivity attributable to pad performance, and pad lifespan, and use those KPIs to drive continuous improvement and supplier accountability. These actions will strengthen resilience while enabling more predictable, scalable polishing outcomes.

A rigorous methodology blending primary fabrication engagement, supplier technical interviews, and engineering literature synthesis to produce actionable CMP pad insights

This research synthesis combines primary engagement with CMP process engineers, procurement leads, and supplier technical teams alongside a structured review of engineering literature, patent disclosures, and equipment integration case studies to construct a balanced view of polishing pad dynamics. Primary insight gathering focused on process-level performance criteria-removal rate control, within-wafer uniformity, defectivity patterns, and conditioning lifecycle-while supplier interviews explored production scalability, quality systems, and field-support models. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with engineering studies and publicly available fabrication best practices to validate technical trends and emergent material choices.

Analytical rigor was applied through cross-functional review cycles that involved subject-matter experts in materials science, process integration, and supply-chain management. Wherever possible, findings emphasize observable operational responses and engineering trade-offs rather than speculative projections. The methodology privileges reproducible process metrics and documented qualification experiences to ensure recommendations remain actionable for fab managers, procurement executives, and R&D teams seeking to align pad selection with broader fabrication objectives.

Converging technical and commercial priorities point toward system-level pad strategies that enable consistent planarization, lower defectivity, and more resilient fabrication operations

CMP polishing pads represent a critical junction between materials engineering and semiconductor manufacturing economics, and recent developments underscore the need for integrated decision-making across technical and commercial domains. Technological advances in pad microarchitecture and fixed abrasive options offer compelling pathways to reduce dishing and improve uniformity, but they must be matched with refined conditioning practices and slurry optimization. Simultaneously, procurement strategies that incorporate regional sourcing flexibility and collaborative supplier relationships mitigate tariff exposure and supply-chain disruption risk.

In conclusion, the path to sustained CMP performance rests on treating pads as part of a broader process system rather than as isolated consumables. By aligning co-development, qualification, and operational KPIs, fabs can achieve more predictable planarity, lower defectivity, and longer pad lifecycles. These outcomes in turn support higher yields and smoother node transitions, equipping manufacturers to meet the increasing demands of advanced logic and memory device production with greater confidence.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Conventional Pad
  • 8.2. Fixed Abrasive Pad

9. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Material

  • 9.1. Copper
  • 9.2. Oxide
  • 9.3. Tungsten

10. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Logic Devices
  • 10.2. Memory Devices
    • 10.2.1. Dram
    • 10.2.2. Nand Flash

11. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by End User

  • 11.1. Foundries
  • 11.2. Idms
  • 11.3. Osats

12. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market

16. China Semiconductor CMP Polishing Pad Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. BASF SE
  • 17.6. Cabot Microelectronics Corporation
  • 17.7. Dow Inc.
  • 17.8. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • 17.9. Entegris, Inc.
  • 17.10. Fujibo Co., Ltd.
  • 17.11. Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 17.12. Pureon AG
  • 17.13. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 17.14. Thomas West Incorporated
  • 17.15. Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
  • 17.16. Tosoh Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENTIONAL PAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENTIONAL PAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENTIONAL PAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED ABRASIVE PAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED ABRASIVE PAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED ABRASIVE PAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TUNGSTEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TUNGSTEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TUNGSTEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY LOGIC DEVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY LOGIC DEVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY LOGIC DEVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY DRAM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY DRAM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY DRAM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY NAND FLASH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY NAND FLASH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY NAND FLASH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY IDMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY IDMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY IDMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OSATS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OSATS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY OSATS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. AMERICAS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. NORTH AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. LATIN AMERICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. ASEAN SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GCC SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPEAN UNION SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. BRICS SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. G7 SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. NATO SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. UNITED STATES SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY MEMORY DEVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR CMP POLISHING PAD MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)