查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1856587

核子反應爐退役市場：按服務類型、計劃階段、核子反應爐類型、廢棄物類型、所有者分類 - 全球預測 2025-2032

Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market by Service Type, Project Phase, Reactor Type, Waste Type, Ownership - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2032 年，核子反應爐退役市場規模將達到 108.9 億美元，年複合成長率為 16.08%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2024 33億美元
預計年份：2025年 38.2億美元
預測年份 2032 108.9億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 16.08%

全面介紹現代除役環境，重點關注安全、不斷變化的法規、勞動力動態和綜合專案管治。

核能發電廠除役正從一項臨時性活動轉變為具有國家重要性的永久性項目，其促進因素包括基礎設施老化、管理體制不斷演變以及公眾對環境保護日益成長的期望。如今，相關人員面臨著多重挑戰：既要安全拆除設施，又要在日益嚴格的合規框架內管理放射性廢棄物，還要修復場地以供未來生產性利用，同時還要與當地社區保持透明的溝通。這些現實情況對營運商、承包商、監管機構和投資者提出了新的要求，即在技術嚴謹性和計劃高效管治之間取得平衡。

技術創新、不斷演變的採購和資金籌措模式、監管協調以及勞動力轉型如何再形成除役實踐和結果

近年來，除役計劃的構思、規劃和執行方式發生了翻天覆地的變化。機器人技術、遙感探測和數位建模的進步，使得對受污染系統進行更精確的表徵和製定更安全的干涉策略成為可能，從而減少了工作人員的暴露風險，並實現了更廢棄物分類。這些創新與拆除流程和原位修復技術的改進相輔相成，縮短了關鍵路徑活動，並提高了結果的可預測性。

分析2025年關稅環境如何重塑除役計畫的供應鏈、籌資策略、國內採購和國際夥伴關係。

2025年推出的貿易政策變化對支持核子反應爐退役計劃的全球供應鏈產生了顯著的次生影響。進口重型設備、專用工具和某些工程部件的關稅增加，提高了依賴跨境採購的計劃投入成本，迫使專案方重新評估籌資策略和計劃進度。因此，許多專案經理已啟動供應商重新甄選流程和應急計劃，以降低更高的到岸成本和更長的前置作業時間帶來的風險。

細分市場主導的業務要務揭示了服務類型、計劃階段、核子反應爐技術、廢棄物分類和所有權模式如何決定策略和資源分配。

深入了解服務類型、計劃階段、核子反應爐類型、廢棄物流和所有權結構，對於建立整個退役專案的交付模式和資源分配至關重要。提供的服務包括：拆除和移除（可透過人工或機械方式進行）；規劃和諮詢服務，涵蓋可行性研究到法規遵從策略；場地修復活動，包括土地恢復和景觀美化；以及各種廢棄物管理解決方案，從異地到場內處理。這些服務差異體現在計劃生命週期的合約方式、安全通訊協定和技術選擇。

區域性因素透過監管差異、工業能力差異以及對社區參與的期望，影響退役計畫的實施。這些因素共同作用，塑造除役計畫實施的進程。這些因素包括監管多樣性、工業能力差異以及對社區參與的期望。

區域動態除役計畫的規劃和實施有顯著影響，這體現在管理體制、工業產能、廢棄物處理基礎設施和公眾輿論等方面的差異。在美洲，悠久的核能發電歷史和完善的法律規範造就了高度的程序嚴謹性和豐富的機構知識，而具體場址的社會許可考慮和區域處置方案則影響著項目的進度安排和最終方案。跨境合作和北美供應鏈在重型設備和專業承包商的採購方面也發揮著重要作用。

透過技術專業化、綜合服務和績效驅動型合約創造競爭優勢的企業策略和競爭模式

在除役生態系統中營運的公司透過技術專長、綜合服務模式和策略夥伴關係關係脫穎而出，這些優勢融合了工程、廢棄物管理和環境修復等多個學科。領先企業正在投資於專用工具、機器人系統和數位化平台，以實現遠端操作、最佳化拆卸流程並提高可追溯性，從而確保符合監管要求。這些能力通常與諮詢服務相結合，以幫助企業應對複雜的授權要求和長期監管義務。

為業主和承包商提供切實可行的、優先的步驟，以加強其供應鏈，促進安全拆除，並交付獲得監管機構和社區核准的計劃。

行業領導者應採取一系列積極主動的措施，以增強專案韌性並提高執行確定性。首先，應優先投資模組化、遠端和機器人技術，以減少工人暴露風險並加快高風險拆除作業的速度。技術投資應與嚴格的合格計畫和供應商發展計畫結合，以確保核級零件和工具的及時供應。

我們以證據為基礎的研究途徑結合了相關人員訪談、技術領域檢驗、監管審查和專家小組檢驗，以確保獲得可操作的洞見。

本研究採用的調查方法結合了主要利害關係人參與、系統性文獻回顧和技術檢驗，以確保研究結果基於實證且具有實際應用價值。主要資料收集包括對營運商、監管機構、退役相關人員、廢棄物處理機構和技術供應商進行結構化訪談，以深入了解實際操作並突出新興的最佳實踐。現場考察和技術巡視是訪談的補充，檢驗實際退役環境中的運作限制和設備使用。

最終結果凸顯了專案成功需要整合專案管治、增強供應鏈韌性、推廣技術應用以及持續的相關人員參與。

核子反應爐的有效除役不僅僅是技術上的執行，還需要全面的專案管治、靈活的採購方式以及相關人員的持續參與。貫穿所有服務線、計劃階段、核子反應爐類型、廢棄物類別和所有權模式的共同點是，需要進行通用規劃，使技術能力與監管承諾和社區期望保持一致。技術創新和不斷變化的採購格局為提高安全性和效率提供了機遇，但這些成果取決於嚴格的供應商管理和對員工能力的持續投入。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場概覽

第5章 市場洞察

  • 放射性廢棄物處理領域對先進機器人系統的需求日益成長
  • 加速將核子反應爐廠址轉移到棕地或待開發區再開發策略
  • 運用數位雙胞胎技術最佳化除役計劃時間表
  • 對永續、低碳拆除流程的監管壓力日益增大
  • 擴大國際合作，共用核能發電廠退役的最佳實踐
  • 擴展遠端監測和人工智慧驅動的分析以進行核子反應爐安全評估

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章 按服務類型分類的核子反應爐退役市場

  • 拆除/移除
    • 手動拆卸
    • 機器拆卸
  • 規劃與諮詢
    • 可行性研究
    • 監理合規
  • 場地維修
    • 土地修復
    • 環境修復
  • 廢棄物管理
    • 異地處理
    • 現場處理

第9章 依計劃階段分類的核子反應爐退役市場

  • 去污
  • 拆卸
  • 退役後監測
  • 場地維修
  • 廢棄物處理

第10章 依核子反應爐類型分類的核子反應爐退役市場

  • 沸水式反應爐
  • 快滋生式反應爐
  • 氣冷反應器
  • 重水反應器
  • 壓水式反應爐

第11章 按廢棄物類型分類的核子反應爐退役市場

  • 高放射性廢棄物
  • 中級廢棄物
  • 低放射性廢棄物

第12章核子反應爐退役市場

  • 國有
  • 私人

第13章 各地區核子反應爐退役市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章核子反應爐退役市場：依組別分類

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章 各國核子反應爐退役市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章 競爭格局

  • 2024年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2024
  • 競爭分析
    • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • Fluor Corporation
    • AECOM
    • Bechtel Corporation
    • SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • Tetra Tech, Inc.
    • Orano SA
    • Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
    • Babcock International Group PLC
    • Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-742BD5182230

The Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market is projected to grow by USD 10.89 billion at a CAGR of 16.08% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.30 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 3.82 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 10.89 billion
CAGR (%) 16.08%

A comprehensive orientation to the contemporary decommissioning environment highlighting safety, regulatory evolution, workforce dynamics, and integrated program governance

The decommissioning of nuclear power reactors is transitioning from an episodic activity into an enduring program of national significance, driven by a convergence of aging infrastructure, evolving regulatory regimes, and heightened public expectations for environmental stewardship. Stakeholders now face a multifaceted challenge: to retire facilities safely, to manage radioactive wastes within stricter compliance windows, and to restore sites for future productive use while maintaining transparent engagement with communities. These realities place new demands on operators, contractors, regulators, and investors to harmonize technical rigor with efficient project governance.

Against this backdrop, pragmatic planning and adaptive execution are paramount. The introduction of advanced remote systems, refined radiological characterization techniques, and more systematic waste segregation is changing how teams scope and sequence decommissioning tasks. At the same time, regulatory frameworks are becoming more prescriptive in areas such as long-term surveillance, waste transport, and end-state land use. Consequently, planning now extends well beyond shutdown to encompass legacy liabilities, long-duration surveillance obligations, and the social license required for site redevelopment.

Transitioning from concept to deliverable requires robust interdisciplinary coordination. Engineering assessments must be integrated with regulatory strategy, community outreach, and financing structures. Moreover, workforce planning and knowledge transfer are increasingly central as experienced personnel retire and new skillsets are required. In sum, the introduction to this sector underscores an imperative: decommissioning must be managed as a strategic national program that balances safety, cost-effectiveness, and social accountability.

How technological innovation, evolving procurement and financing models, regulatory harmonization, and workforce transitions are reshaping decommissioning practice and outcomes

Recent years have witnessed transformative shifts that are redefining how decommissioning projects are conceived, planned, and executed. Technological advances in robotics, remote sensing, and digital modeling now permit more precise characterization of contaminated systems and safer intervention strategies, thereby reducing personnel exposure and enabling more granular waste segregation. These innovations are complemented by process improvements in dismantling sequences and site restoration techniques that shorten critical path activities and improve predictability of outcomes.

Concurrently, procurement and contracting models are evolving. Collaborative contractual structures and performance-based incentives encourage contractors to assume greater end-to-end responsibility, aligning commercial interests with long-term stewardship objectives. Financing instruments are also adapting; blended public-private arrangements and long-term liability funding mechanisms are becoming more common, which serves to de-risk projects and catalyze private-sector participation.

Regulatory transformation is another pivotal shift. Agencies are increasingly focused on harmonizing standards across jurisdictions, improving transparency of decommissioning milestones, and specifying robust post-closure surveillance requirements. This regulatory tightening is prompting earlier and more detailed engagement between operators and regulators, which reduces surprises during execution. Finally, the talent pipeline is shifting: aging workforces and the emergence of new technical domains require targeted training programs and knowledge-transfer initiatives to preserve institutional memory. Together, these shifts create a new operational paradigm-one in which integrated systems, multidisciplinary teams, and adaptive management approaches define successful outcomes.

Analysis of how the 2025 tariff environment has recalibrated supply chains, procurement strategies, domestic sourcing, and international partnerships in decommissioning programs

Trade policy changes introduced in 2025 have produced tangible second-order effects across global supply chains that support reactor decommissioning projects. Tariff measures affecting imported heavy equipment, specialized tooling, and certain engineered components have increased input costs for projects reliant on cross-border procurement, thereby creating pressure to reassess sourcing strategies and project schedules. As a result, many program managers have initiated supplier requalification processes and contingency planning to mitigate exposure to higher landed costs and longer lead times.

In response, one observable adaptation has been accelerated engagement with domestic manufacturers and fabricators. While domestic substitution can reduce tariff risk, it often requires qualification cycles to ensure that alternative suppliers meet nuclear-grade standards, which can introduce near-term schedule risk. Similarly, tariffs have catalyzed more strategic inventory planning and earlier procurement windows to hedge against uncertain trade conditions. These procurement adjustments have implications for capital allocation and for contract structuring, with greater emphasis on fixed-price or cost-sharing arrangements to allocate tariff-related risk.

Moreover, tariffs influence international collaboration on technology transfer and joint ventures. Some international vendors are restructuring their supply footprints by localizing assembly or partnering with domestic firms to preserve market access. Regulatory bodies and project owners are therefore placing a heightened focus on supplier audits, quality assurance, and traceability, ensuring that changes in supply chain architecture do not compromise safety or compliance. Taken together, the cumulative impact of the 2025 tariff environment is prompting a recalibration of sourcing strategies, contract terms, and cross-border partnerships to sustain program continuity and to protect long-term stewardship objectives.

Segment-driven operational imperatives revealing how service types, project phases, reactor technologies, waste categorizations, and ownership models determine strategy and resource allocation

A granular understanding of service types, project phases, reactor varieties, waste streams, and ownership structures is essential for shaping delivery models and resource allocation across decommissioning portfolios. Service offerings encompass dismantling and demolition-executed through either manual dismantling or mechanical dismantling-planning and consulting services that span feasibility studies to regulatory compliance strategy, site restoration activities that include land remediation and landscaping, and waste management solutions that range from offsite treatment to onsite treatment. These service distinctions inform contracting approaches, safety protocols, and technology selection throughout the project lifecycle.

Project phases further refine program sequencing, beginning with decontamination activities to reduce radiological inventories, followed by dismantling tasks, then post-decommissioning surveillance to ensure long-term safety, site restoration to meet envisioned land uses, and waste processing to condition and package material for transport or disposal. Each phase has distinct technical requirements and regulatory checkpoints, which necessitates tailored workforce competencies and quality assurance processes.

Reactor technology also drives technical strategy. Decommissioning approaches vary across boiling water reactors, fast breeder reactors, gas cooled reactors, heavy water reactors, and pressurized water reactors due to differences in design, material inventories, and radiological profiles. Waste categorization into high level, intermediate level, and low level streams further dictates handling protocols, treatment pathways, and storage arrangements. Finally, ownership models-whether government owned or private owned-shape governance frameworks, funding mechanisms, and risk allocation. Public ownership frequently emphasizes national liability management and long-term stewardship, whereas private ownership often prioritizes efficiency and commercial closure conditions. Integrating these segmentation lenses supports more precise project scoping, risk management, and capability development.

Regional dynamics that shape decommissioning program execution through regulatory diversity, industrial capacity differences, and community engagement expectations

Regional dynamics materially influence how decommissioning programs are planned and implemented, reflecting differences in regulatory regimes, industrial capacity, waste disposal infrastructure, and public sentiment. In the Americas, long histories of nuclear generation combined with established regulatory frameworks contribute to a high degree of procedural rigor and institutional knowledge, while site-specific social license considerations and regional disposal options shape program timelines and end-state planning. Cross-border cooperation and North American supply chains also play a role in sourcing heavy equipment and specialized contractors.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment is diverse, with mature decommissioning programs in some European nations coexisting alongside emerging frameworks in other parts of the region. This heterogeneity necessitates adaptable technical standards and frequent regulatory dialogue. In many jurisdictions within this region, strong public engagement mechanisms and environmental remediation requirements place additional emphasis on transparent community consultation and on restoring land for alternate uses.

Across Asia-Pacific, growth in reactor installations over recent decades has produced a concentration of decommissioning activity as older units retire. The region exhibits rapid adoption of advanced dismantling technologies and a pragmatic approach to public-private partnerships to mobilize funding and technical expertise. Variations in waste disposal infrastructure and local manufacturing capabilities influence whether programs prioritize localization of supply or rely on regional procurement networks. In all regions, the interplay between regulatory certainty, industrial capability, and social acceptance determines the pace and character of decommissioning efforts.

Corporate strategies and collaborative models that create competitive advantage through technical specialization, integrated services, and performance-oriented contracting

Companies operating in the decommissioning ecosystem are distinguishing themselves through a combination of technical specialization, integrated service models, and strategic partnerships that bridge engineering, waste management, and environmental remediation domains. Leading firms are investing in purpose-built tooling, robotic systems, and digital platforms that enable remote operations, optimize dismantling sequences, and improve traceability for regulatory compliance. These capabilities are frequently coupled with advisory services that help clients navigate complex permitting requirements and long-term surveillance obligations.

Strategic collaboration is a clear differentiator. Firms that pursue joint ventures and alliances with local contractors, technology providers, and logistics specialists can access new markets more rapidly while sharing technical risk. Similarly, companies that offer end-to-end solutions-from radiological characterization and decontamination to waste processing and site restoration-can capture synergies that reduce interfaces and streamline project governance. Talent strategies also matter: organizations that invest in training pipelines, apprenticeships, and knowledge transfer programs are better positioned to retain institutional expertise and to scale complex projects across multiple geographies.

From a commercial standpoint, performance-based contracting and outcome-linked service agreements are increasingly common as owners seek to align incentives with long-term stewardship objectives. Firms that demonstrate rigorous quality assurance, robust supply chain controls, and transparent reporting practices tend to build stronger regulatory and community trust, which in turn reduces friction during execution and supports reputational resilience over multi-decade decommissioning horizons.

Practical and prioritized steps for owners and contractors to strengthen supply chains, accelerate safe dismantling, and secure regulatory and community approval for projects

Industry leaders should adopt a proactive portfolio of measures to strengthen program resilience and to improve execution certainty. First, prioritize investment in modular, remote, and robotics technologies that reduce worker exposure and increase the pace of high-risk dismantling tasks. Pair technology investments with rigorous qualification programs and supplier development initiatives to ensure timely availability of nuclear-grade components and tooling.

Second, reshape procurement strategies to mitigate trade policy and supply chain risk. This includes diversifying supplier bases, accelerating long-lead procurement windows, and negotiating contract terms that share tariff-related exposures between owners and vendors. Where feasible, cultivate strategic partnerships with domestic fabricators to shorten supply chains while maintaining compliance and quality assurance standards.

Third, engage early and constructively with regulators and community stakeholders. Transparent planning, staged communication of safety cases, and demonstrable remediation commitments reduce public uncertainty and can expedite permitting cycles. Simultaneously, develop workforce transition programs that capture retiring expertise and train the next generation across radiological control, remote systems operation, and project management disciplines.

Finally, implement governance structures that integrate technical, regulatory, and commercial decision-making. Cross-functional program teams with clear accountability for risk registers, schedule fidelity, and stakeholder engagement can improve alignment and reduce cost-producing change orders. Together, these actions create a resilient operational framework capable of delivering safe, compliant, and socially responsible decommissioning outcomes.

An evidence-based research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical site validation, regulatory review, and expert panel validation to ensure actionable insights

The underlying research methodology combines primary stakeholder engagement, systematic document review, and technical validation to ensure the findings are evidence-based and operationally relevant. Primary data collection included structured interviews with operators, regulators, decommissioning contractors, waste disposal authorities, and technology vendors to capture real-world execution insights and to surface emerging best practices. Site visits and technical walkdowns supplemented interviews, enabling validation of operational constraints and verification of equipment usage in active decommissioning environments.

Secondary research encompassed comprehensive review of regulatory frameworks, scientific literature, reference standards, and publicly available project documentation to build a robust contextual foundation. This review informed detailed technical analyses, including assessment of decontamination techniques, dismantling methods, and waste conditioning pathways. Triangulation between primary and secondary sources ensured that conclusions are consistent with operational realities and regulatory expectations.

Analytical rigor was maintained through expert panel reviews and quality assurance processes, which included scenario analysis to test the robustness of strategic recommendations under varying procurement, regulatory, and technology adoption conditions. Data integrity checks and source traceability protocols were applied throughout the research lifecycle to ensure reproducibility and transparency of the conclusions offered to program leaders and policy makers.

A decisive synthesis underscoring the need for integrated program governance, supply chain resilience, technology adoption, and sustained stakeholder engagement for success

Effective decommissioning of nuclear power reactors requires more than technical execution; it demands integrated program governance, adaptive procurement, and enduring stakeholder engagement. Across service lines, project phases, reactor types, waste categories, and ownership models, the common thread is the need for coordinated planning that aligns technical capabilities with regulatory commitments and community expectations. Technological innovation and changing procurement dynamics present opportunities to improve safety and efficiency, yet these gains depend on disciplined supplier management and sustained investment in workforce competencies.

Policy shifts and trade measures have underscored the importance of supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing, prompting owners and contractors to reassess vendor qualifications and to develop contingency arrangements. Regionally, the differences in regulatory maturity and industrial capacity require tailored approaches that reflect local disposal infrastructures and public sentiment. Companies that combine integrated service offerings with transparent reporting and strong quality assurance will be best positioned to navigate the complexity of multi-decade decommissioning obligations.

In closing, leaders should treat decommissioning as a strategic long-term program that balances technical excellence with social accountability. Thoughtful alignment of technology, procurement, regulatory engagement, and talent development will determine which programs achieve safe, timely, and socially accepted outcomes.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Rising demand for advanced robotic systems in radiological waste handling
  • 5.2. Accelerating transfer of reactor sites to brownfield or greenfield land redevelopment strategies
  • 5.3. Implementation of digital twin technology to optimize decommissioning project timelines
  • 5.4. Increasing regulatory pressure for sustainable low carbon dismantling processes
  • 5.5. Growth in international collaborations for sharing best practices in nuclear plant decommissioning
  • 5.6. Expansion of remote monitoring and AI driven analytics for reactor safety assessments

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Dismantling & Demolition
    • 8.1.1. Manual Dismantling
    • 8.1.2. Mechanical Dismantling
  • 8.2. Planning & Consulting
    • 8.2.1. Feasibility Study
    • 8.2.2. Regulatory Compliance
  • 8.3. Site Restoration
    • 8.3.1. Land Remediation
    • 8.3.2. Landscaping
  • 8.4. Waste Management
    • 8.4.1. Offsite Treatment
    • 8.4.2. Onsite Treatment

9. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Project Phase

  • 9.1. Decontamination
  • 9.2. Dismantling
  • 9.3. Post Decommissioning Surveillance
  • 9.4. Site Restoration
  • 9.5. Waste Processing

10. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Reactor Type

  • 10.1. Boiling Water Reactor
  • 10.2. Fast Breeder Reactor
  • 10.3. Gas Cooled Reactor
  • 10.4. Heavy Water Reactor
  • 10.5. Pressurized Water Reactor

11. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Waste Type

  • 11.1. High Level Waste
  • 11.2. Intermediate Level Waste
  • 11.3. Low Level Waste

12. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Ownership

  • 12.1. Government Owned
  • 12.2. Private Owned

13. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • 16.3.2. Fluor Corporation
    • 16.3.3. AECOM
    • 16.3.4. Bechtel Corporation
    • 16.3.5. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • 16.3.6. Tetra Tech, Inc.
    • 16.3.7. Orano SA
    • 16.3.8. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
    • 16.3.9. Babcock International Group PLC
    • 16.3.10. Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. EUROPE NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. ASEAN NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. GCC NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. BRICS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. G7 NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. NATO NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 29. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 30. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWN