封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1701289

美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場規模、佔有率、趨勢分析報告(按軟體產品、軟體類型、最終用途、細分市場預測,2025 年至 2030 年)

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Software Delivery (Cloud Based, On Premise), By Software Type (Pre-Operative, Post Operative), By End-use, And Segment Forecasts, 2025 - 2030

出版日期: | 出版商: Grand View Research | 英文 150 Pages | 商品交期: 2-10個工作天內

價格

美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場成長與趨勢:

根據 Grand View Research, Inc. 的最新研究,美國整形外科手術計畫軟體市場規模預計到 2030 年將達到 3,487 萬美元,2025 年至 2030 年期間的複合年成長率為 6.05%。

醫院和診所擴大採用整形外科手術規劃軟體來實現高效的工作流程管理,從而推動市場成長。此外,行業技術進步和精度、效率的創新正在推動市場成長。例如,2021 年 6 月,Radlink, Inc. 推出了 Radlink3D,這是一款術中軟體,旨在評估髖臼杯的位置並解決全髖關節置換術期間的骨盆傾斜和脊椎骨盆活動性。這項創新技術採用 2D-3D抗蝕劑進行術前規劃。

隨著世界人口老化,與老齡化相關的整形外科疾病(包括骨關節炎、退化性關節病變、骨折和骨質疏鬆症)的盛行率正在顯著增加。根據世界衛生組織報告,到2030年,全球六分之一的人口將超過60歲。屆時,60歲及以上人口比例將從2020年的10億增加到14億。 2050年,全球60歲以上人口將翻倍,達到21億人。由於骨骼和關節隨著時間的推移而自然退化,這一層特別容易受到整形外科疾病的影響,導致活動能力和肌肉質量的喪失。因此,預計這些因素將在預測期內推動市場成長。

此外,微創手術因其切口小、組織創傷小、恢復時間快等優點,在整形外科中受到關注。常見的手術包括關節鏡手術、內視鏡脊椎手術和微創關節關節重建。這些程序非常複雜,需要仔細的術前和術後規劃。整形外科手術規劃軟體透過提供詳細的 3D 視覺化、即時模擬和精確測量發揮著至關重要的作用。這項技術可幫助外科醫生有效地導航複雜的解剖結構,有助於加速市場成長。

此外,市場參與者正在選擇各種策略性舉措,預計將促進國內市場的成長。美敦力推出了一款專為整形外科手術設計的新型人工智慧術前規劃工具,以滿足該領域對先進技術日益成長的需求。該計劃反映了將人工智慧融入手術計劃過程以提高準確性和治療效果的更廣泛趨勢。此外,2024 年 6 月,Zimmer Biomet 與一家醫療軟體供應商建立策略夥伴關係,開發由人工智慧驅動的術前規劃工具,旨在提高整形外科手術的準確性。此類合作凸顯了領先公司對創新和加強手術規劃技術的承諾。

美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場報告重點

  • 根據軟體交付,雲端基礎的部分在 2024 年佔據了最大的收益佔有率。這是由於技術不斷進步以及醫療機構缺乏操作和管理該軟體的熟練專業人員。
  • 根據軟體類型,就 2024 年的收入佔有率而言,術前部分佔據了市場主導地位。這是由於人們越來越意識到使用術前手術規劃軟體的好處。
  • 根據最終用途,由於在整形外科診所尋求手術的患者數量不斷增加以及全球整形外科診所數量的不斷增加,預計整形外科診所將在 2024 年佔據主導地位。

目錄

第1章調查方法與範圍

第2章執行摘要

第3章市場變數、趨勢和範圍

  • 市場展望
    • 母市場展望
    • 相關/附隨市場展望
  • 美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場-市場動態
    • 市場促進因素分析
    • 市場限制因素分析
  • 美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場:分析工具
    • 波特五力分析
    • PESTLE分析
  • 整形外科手術規劃軟體產業的當前市場趨勢
  • 案例研究分析

第4章美國整形外科手術計畫軟體市場:軟體產品評估與趨勢分析

  • 定義和範圍
  • 2024 年和 2030 年軟體供應商市場佔有率分析
  • 細分儀表板
  • 美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場(依軟體產品分類),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 雲端基礎
  • 本地

第5章美國整形外科手術計劃軟體市場:軟體類型的估計和趨勢分析

  • 定義和範圍
  • 2024 年及 2030 年按軟體類型分類的市場佔有率分析
  • 細分儀表板
  • 美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場(按軟體類型分類),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 術前
  • 術後

第6章美國整形外科手術計劃軟體市場:最終用途估計和趨勢分析

  • 定義和範圍
  • 2024 年及 2030 年最終用途市場佔有率分析
  • 細分儀表板
  • 美國整形外科手術規劃軟體市場(按最終用途分類),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 醫院
  • 整形外科診所

第7章美國整形外科手術計畫軟體市場:競爭格局

  • 參與企業
  • 2024年企業市場分析
  • 戰略地圖
  • 公司簡介
    • Stryker
    • Radlink, Inc.
    • Zimmer Biomet
    • DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies)
    • Enhatch Inc.
    • Brainlab AG
    • Corin Group.
    • EOS imaging (ATEC Spine Inc.)
    • Formus Labs Ltd
    • mediCAD.
Product Code: GVR-4-68040-536-3

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Growth & Trends:

The U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market size is expected to reach USD 34.87 million by 2030 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of 6.05% from 2025 to 2030, according to a new study by Grand View Research, Inc. Increasing adoption of orthopedic surgical planning software by hospitals and clinics for efficient workflow management is driving market growth. Moreover, technological advancements and innovations in precision and efficiency in the industry boost market growth. For instance, in June 2021, Radlink, Inc. introduced Radlink3D, an intraoperative software designed to assess cup positions and address pelvic tilt and spinopelvic mobility during total hip replacement surgeries. This innovative technology employs 2D-3D registration for preoperative planning.

As the global population ages, there is a substantial rise in the prevalence of age-related orthopedic conditions, such as osteoarthritis, degenerative joint diseases, fractures, and osteoporosis. As per the WHO report, by the year 2030, one in every six individuals globally will be 60 years or older. At that time, the percentage of the population aged 60 and up will rise from 1 billion in 2020 to 1.4 billion. By the year 2050, the global population of those aged 60 years and above will be twice as large, reaching 2.1 billion. This demographic is particularly vulnerable to orthopedic conditions due to the natural degeneration of bones and joints over time, along with decreased mobility and muscle mass. Thus, such factors are anticipated to fuel market growth over the forecast period.

Furthermore, minimally invasive surgeries have gained attention in orthopedics for their benefits, including smaller incisions, less tissue trauma, and faster recovery times. Common procedures include arthroscopy, endoscopic spinal surgeries, and minimally invasive joint replacements. These techniques necessitate thorough preoperative and postoperative planning because of their complexity. Orthopedic surgical planning software plays a crucial role by providing detailed 3D visualizations, real-time simulations, and precise measurements. This technology helps surgeons navigate complex anatomical structures effectively, contributing to the accelerated growth of the market.

Furthermore, market players are opting for various strategic initiatives expected to boost the growth of the market in the country. Medtronic has launched new AI-driven preoperative planning tools tailored for orthopedic surgeries, responding to the increasing demand for advanced technologies in the field. This initiative reflects a broader trend of integrating artificial intelligence into surgical planning processes to enhance precision and outcomes. In addition, in June 2024, Zimmer Biomet formed a strategic partnership with a healthcare software provider to develop AI-powered preoperative planning tools aimed at improving precision in orthopedic surgeries. Such collaborations emphasize the commitment of major players to innovate and enhance surgical planning technologies.

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Report Highlights:

  • Based on software delivery, the cloud-based segment held the largest revenue share in 2024, owing to rising technological advancements, and a shortage of skilled professionals to operate and manage this software in healthcare facilities.
  • Based on software type, the pre-operative segment dominated the market with revenue share in 2024, due to growing awareness regarding the benefits associated with the use of pre-operative surgical planning software.
  • Based on end use, the orthopedic clinics owing to patients' increasing preference for surgery in orthopedic clinics and the increasing number of orthopedic clinics globally.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
    • 1.1.1. Segment scope
    • 1.1.2. Regional scope
    • 1.1.3. Estimates and forecast timeline
  • 1.2. Research Methodology
  • 1.3. Information Procurement
    • 1.3.1. Purchased database
    • 1.3.2. GVR's internal database
    • 1.3.3. Secondary sources
    • 1.3.4. Primary research
    • 1.3.5. Details of primary research
  • 1.4. Information or Data Analysis
    • 1.4.1. Data analysis models
  • 1.5. Market Formulation & Validation
  • 1.6. Model Details
    • 1.6.1. Commodity flow analysis (Model 1)
      • 1.6.1.1. Approach 1: Commodity flow approach
  • 1.7. Research Assumptions
  • 1.8. List of Secondary Sources
  • 1.9. List of Primary Sources

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

  • 2.1. Market Outlook
  • 2.2. Segment Outlook
    • 2.2.1. Software Delivery outlook
    • 2.2.2. Software Type outlook
    • 2.2.3. End Use outlook
  • 2.3. Competitive Insights

Chapter 3. Market Variables, Trends, and Scope

  • 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
    • 3.1.1. Parent Market Outlook
    • 3.1.2. Related/Ancillary Market Outlook
  • 3.2. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market - Market Dynamics
    • 3.2.1. Market Driver Analysis
    • 3.2.2. Market Restraint Analysis
  • 3.3. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Analysis Tools
    • 3.3.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 3.3.2. PESTLE Analysis
  • 3.4. Current Market Trends in Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Industry
  • 3.5. Case Study Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Software Delivery Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 4.1. Definition and Scope
  • 4.2. Software Delivery Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 4.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 4.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by Software Delivery, 2018 to 2030
  • 4.5. Cloud-based
    • 4.5.1. Cloud-based Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 4.6. On-premise
    • 4.6.1. On-premise Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 5. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Software Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 5.1. Definition and Scope
  • 5.2. Software Type Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 5.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 5.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by Software Type, 2018 to 2030
  • 5.5. Pre-Operative
    • 5.5.1. Pre-Operative Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 5.6. Post Operative
    • 5.6.1. Post Operative Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 6. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: End Use Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 6.1. Definition and Scope
  • 6.2. End Use Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 6.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 6.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by End Use, 2018 to 2030
  • 6.5. Hospitals
    • 6.5.1. Hospitals Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 6.6. Orthopedic Clinics
    • 6.6.1. Orthopedic Clinics Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 7. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Competitive Landscape

  • 7.1. Participant's Categorization
  • 7.2. Company Market Position Analysis, 2024
  • 7.3. Strategy Mapping
  • 7.4. Company Profiles
    • 7.4.1. Stryker
      • 7.4.1.1. Overview
      • 7.4.1.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.1.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.2. Radlink, Inc.
      • 7.4.2.1. Overview
      • 7.4.2.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.2.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.3. Zimmer Biomet
      • 7.4.3.1. Overview
      • 7.4.3.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.3.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.4. DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies)
      • 7.4.4.1. Overview
      • 7.4.4.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.4.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.5. Enhatch Inc.
      • 7.4.5.1. Overview
      • 7.4.5.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.5.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.6. Brainlab AG
      • 7.4.6.1. Overview
      • 7.4.6.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.6.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.7. Corin Group.
      • 7.4.7.1. Overview
      • 7.4.7.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.7.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.8. EOS imaging (ATEC Spine Inc.)
      • 7.4.8.1. Overview
      • 7.4.8.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.8.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.9. Formus Labs Ltd
      • 7.4.9.1. Overview
      • 7.4.9.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.9.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.10. mediCAD.
      • 7.4.10.1. Overview
      • 7.4.10.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.10.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives

List of Tables

  • Table 1 List of secondary sources
  • Table 2 List of abbreviations
  • Table 3 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by software delivery, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 4 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by software type, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 5 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by end-use, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

List of Figures

  • Fig. 1 Market research process
  • Fig. 2 Data triangulation techniques
  • Fig. 3 Primary research pattern
  • Fig. 4 Value-chain-based sizing & forecasting
  • Fig. 5 QFD modeling for market share assessment
  • Fig. 6 Market research approaches
  • Fig. 7 Market formulation & validation
  • Fig. 8 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: market outlook
  • Fig. 9 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software competitive insights
  • Fig. 10 Parent market outlook
  • Fig. 11 Related/ancillary market outlook.
  • Fig. 12 Industry value chain analysis
  • Fig. 13 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market driver impact
  • Fig. 14 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market restraint impact
  • Fig. 15 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market strategic initiatives analysis
  • Fig. 16 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Delivery movement analysis
  • Fig. 17 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Delivery outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 18 Cloud-based market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 19 On-premise market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 20 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Type movement analysis
  • Fig. 21 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Type outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 22 Pre-Operative market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 23 Post Operative market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 24 Others market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 25 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: End Use movement analysis
  • Fig. 26 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: End Use outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 27 Hospitals market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 28 Orthopedic Clinics market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 29 Heatmap Analysis, 2024