首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 醫療設備

整形外科

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1297780

全球骨科電動工具市場 - 2023-2030年

Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2023年06月15日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

市場概述

全球骨科電動工具市場在2022年達到20億美元，預計到2030年將見證有利可圖的成長，達到30億美元。全球骨科電動工具市場在2023-2030年預測期間預計將呈現5.3%的複合成長率。技術的不斷進步和電動工具優勢的不斷提升，推動了骨科電動工具市場的需求趨勢。

手術電動工具用於骨或骨碎片手術。它使鑽孔、切割、鉸孔和螺絲成為可能。它主要用於人類和動物的骨科手術、神經學、創傷學和五官科手術。今天，骨科手術的每個階段都使用電動工具，從用於傷口護理的脈衝灌洗到用於插入長骨骨折的髓內釘或螺釘的鑽孔和鉸孔。對這些工具進行了進一步的改進，使其變得輕巧，以方便使用者。

更經常使用的是更薄、更輕、重複使用時產生更少熱量的金屬合金。

骨科電動工具市場範圍包括氣動系統、電池操作系統、電動系統和其他技術，這增加了骨科電動工具的市場佔有率。全球骨科電動工具市場正在擴大，其因素包括手術電動工具的不斷進步以及它們在各國即將獲得的醫療批准，為骨科電動工具市場的成長創造了積極的前景。

市場動態

電動工具提供的優勢推動了骨科電動工具市場的成長。

外科醫生使用大部分的手術電動工具。他們的主要目的是在相當長的時間內完成許多手術。為了治療更多的病人，因此他們必須有效地工作，而且要負擔得起。有了外科醫生可以依賴的設備，病人可以集中精力更精確地放置即將植入的植入物，而不必擔心系統是否會發生故障。簡單易用的手術動力器械消除了手術前或手術中的任何延誤。如果設備準備得很快，並能輕鬆地完成外科醫生希望馬達在手術中執行的任務，輔助使用者會感到放心和更有信心。

當使用可自動清洗的高品質外科動力器械時，清潔人員將不得不在更短的時間內與設備互動。由於每個骨科手術都需要一套獨特的手術動力器械，擁有眾多手術室和每天大量病例的醫院通常更傾向於使用更實惠的設備。避免使用高階、高投資額度的設備被認為是有利的。

不斷成長的技術進步的研究和開發為製造商創造了有利可圖的機會。

由於在過去十年中創造了許多系統來解決手動導航骨科設備的缺點，用於手術的機器人系統的種類正在擴大。機器人系統的兩個優點是提高安全性和減少先天性傷害。

在全膝關節置換術中，當與擺動鋸一起使用時，與徒手方法相比，機器人導航可以大大減少先天性損傷的風險。在另一項研究中，研究了機器人輔助的頸椎透鏡螺釘置入術。研究發現，與非機器人引導的置入方式相比，它的功能效果更強，在Kirschner線置入方面達到98.8%的準確性。

與螢光鏡引導下的手術相比，另一項利用機器人輔助椎弓根螺釘置入的研究同樣發現脊柱手術的準確性有所提高。上述因素表明，高研究為骨科電動工具市場的成長創造了機會。

骨科電動工具的缺點，將阻礙市場的成長。

利用電動工具有缺點，包括熱壞死、鑽頭斷裂、傷害附近的組織結構，以及過度鑽孔和過度觀察。使用該小工具的外科醫生將從了解這些發生的情況和致力於創造更好、更安全的醫療設備的技術專家中受益。

用於頭頸部手術的組織選擇性壓電鑽和用於神經外科的自停式鑽頭只是其他學科需求和正在開發的這類設備的兩個例子，因為它們越來越注重安全。

血管、肌腱和神經損傷是骨科先天性損傷的例子，可能會產生嚴重的影響；之前的一項研究顯示，全髖關節置換術中7.3%的血管傷口會導致死亡。一些策略，包括機器人技術、尖端的鑽頭技術和即時反饋機制，正在被開發出來以減少這些傷害。因此，上述這些因素限制了骨科電動工具市場的成長。

COVID-19影響分析

COVID-19分析包括COVID前情景、COVID情景和COVID後情景，此外還有定價動態（包括大流行期間和之後的定價變化，與COVID前情景進行評估）、需求-供應譜（由於貿易限制、封鎖和之後的問題導致的需求和供應轉移）、政府計劃（政府機構重新激活市場、產業或部門的計劃）和製造商戰略計劃。

俄烏戰爭影響分析

俄羅斯-烏克蘭衝突估計對全球骨科電動工具市場的影響不大，因為該地區的主要市場參與者數量較少。然而，在預測期內，原料進出口的影響預計對全球骨科電動工具市場的成長影響不大。

Market Overview

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market reached US$ 2 billion in 2022 and is projected to witness lucrative growth by reaching up to US$ 3 billion by 2030. The global orthopedic power tools market is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 5.3% during the forecast period 2023-2030. The increasing technological advancements and rising advantages for power tools drive demand for orthopedic power tools market trends.

A surgical power tool is used in bone or bone fragment surgery. It makes it possible to drill, cut, ream, and screw. It is mostly utilized in orthopedic surgery, neurology, traumatology, and ENT surgery in humans and animals. Every stage of orthopedic surgery today uses power instruments, from pulse lavage for wound care to drilling and reaming for inserting intramedullary nails or screws in long bone fractures. Further improvements have been made to these tools to make them lightweight for user convenience.

More frequently, metal alloys that are thinner, lighter, and produce less heat when used repeatedly are being used.

The orthopedic power tools market scope comprises technology such as pneumatic-powered systems, battery-operated systems, electric-powered systems and others, which has increased the orthopedic power tools market share. The Global Market for Orthopedic Power tools is expanding due to factors, including the increasing advances in surgical power tools and their upcoming medical approvals across countries, creating a positive outlook for the orthopedic power tools market growth.

Market Dynamics

Advantages Provided by the Power Tools drive the growth of the orthopedic power tools market.

Surgeons use the majority of surgical power tools. Their main objective is to complete numerous surgeries in a fair amount of time. To treat more patients, they must thus work effectively and affordably. With a device the surgeon can rely on, the patient can concentrate on a more precise placement of the implant that will be inserted without worrying about whether or not the system will malfunction. The simple-to-use surgical power instruments eliminate any delays prior to or during the procedure. The auxiliary users will feel relieved and more confident if the device is prepared quickly and can easily accomplish the task the surgeon wants the motor to carry out during the procedure.

When using high-quality surgical power instruments that can be cleaned automatically, the cleaning staff will have to interact with the equipment for a shorter period of time. Since each orthopedic procedure requires a unique set of surgical power instruments, hospitals with numerous operating rooms and a high volume of daily cases typically prefer more affordable devices. Avoiding high-end, high-investment-grade equipment is seen to be advantageous.

Growing Research and Development for Technological Advancements creates lucrative opportunities for manufacturers.

The variety of robotic systems used in surgery is expanding due to the many systems created in the past ten years to address the shortcomings of manually navigated orthopedic equipment. Two advantages of robotic systems are improved security and decreased iatrogenic injuries.

When used in conjunction with oscillating saws, robotic navigation can considerably reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury compared to freehand methods during total knee arthroplasty. In a different study, robotic-assisted cervical transpedicular screw placement was examined. It was discovered that, compared to non-robotic-guided placement, it had enhanced functional results and reached 98.8% accuracy in Kirschner wire placement.

Compared to fluoroscopy-guided procedures, another study utilizing robotically aided pedicle screw placement likewise discovered improved accuracy in spine surgery. The abovementioned factors show that high research creates opportunities for orthopedic power tools market growth.

Disadvantages of Orthopedic Power Tool which will hamper the growth of the market.

Utilizing power tools has drawbacks, including heat necrosis, drill bit breakage, injury to nearby tissue structures, and over drilling and overwatching. The surgeon using the gadget would benefit from knowing about these occurrences and technologists working to create better and safer medical equipment.

Tissue-selective piezoelectric drills for head and neck surgery and self-stopping drills for neurosurgery are only two examples of the kind of equipment that are in demand and being developed in other disciplines because they are more and more safety-focused.

Vascular, tendon and neurological injuries are examples of iatrogenic injuries in orthopedics that can have serious repercussions; a prior study revealed that 7.3% of vascular wounds in total hip arthroplasty result in mortality. Some strategies, including robotics, cutting-edge drill technology, and instantaneous feedback mechanisms, are being developed to lessen these injuries. Hence these above-mentioned factors are limiting the orthopedic power tools market's growth.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The COVID-19 Analysis includes the Pre-COVID Scenario, COVID Scenario, and Post-COVID Scenario in addition to Pricing Dynamics (Including pricing change during and after the pandemic evaluating it with pre-COVID scenarios), Demand-Supply Spectrum (Shift in demand and supply due to trading restrictions, lockdown, and afterward issues), Government Initiatives (Initiatives to reactivate a market, industry, or sector by Government Bodies), and Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The Russia-Ukraine conflict is estimated to have a low impact on the global orthopedic power tools market, owing to the low number of key market players in this region. However, the effect of the import and export of raw materials is expected to have little influence over the global orthopedic power tools market growth over the forecast period.

Segment Analysis

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market is segmented based on product type, technology, end user and region.

Battery Operated Systems from the technology segment account for 45.9% of the market share owing to rising novel product launches.

Drills powered by batteries may be used for hardware engineering or orthopedics. Orthopedic battery drills (OBDs) sold commercially are highly expensive. However, hardware/engineering battery drills (HBD or EBD) can provide the same function while offering some extra practical benefits. The "hardware"/engineering battery drill (EBD) is frequently used in orthopedic surgery. Compared to commercial orthopedic battery drills (OBDs), EBDs have a significant advantage.

These EBDs are excellent alternatives to OBD in hospitals when surgical cost is a concern and resources are limited since they are affordable, user-friendly, have numerous capabilities in orthopedic procedures, are locally bought and easily serviced, have minimal maintenance costs, are tough, and are durable. Several advancements, such as a lightweight, comfortable system with the strength required for reconstructive surgeries and the adaptability required for ortho trauma treatments, are what the X Series Power System by Zimmer Biomet is designed to provide.

Geographical Analysis

Due to major players' strong presence and increasing technological advancements, North America accounted for approximately 39.9% of the market share.

Manufacturers have chances to expand their operations in this region because of the rising demand for orthopedic power tools for advancements in North America. The area has many producers and suppliers, and its rapid economic development has raised the industrial production of orthopedic power tools, increasing demand. North America has a large number of producers and suppliers. As a result of the swift economic development of the area, industrial production has increased, fueling the demand of orthopedic power tools.

Rising new product types or applications will drive market growth. Growth is also fueled by rising technological advancements, regulatory approvals, and novel product launches. Researchers are becoming more aware of various treatment approaches for orthopedic disorders, leading to the expansion of the market in this region. These factors shows the dominance of North America.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the orthopedic power tools market include: CONMED Corporation, Zimmer Biomet, Stryker Inc, Medtronic, DePuy Synthes (J&J), Integra LifeSciences, Aesculap, Inc (B. Braun), Portescap, Misonix Inc., Brasseler USA and Maxon among others.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market segmentation based on product type, technology, end-user and region, and understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous orthopedic power tools market-level data points with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market Report Would Provide Approximately 53 Tables, 54 Figures And 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Product Type
3.2. Snippet by Technology
3.3. Snippet by End-User
3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Growing Prevalence of Minimally Invasive Surgeries
  - 4.1.1.2. Rising Prevalence of Fractures
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Hospital Consolidation and Cost-Containment Pressures
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
  - 4.1.3.1. Growing Novel Technological Advancements
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's 5 Forces Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
- 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
- 6.1.3. Post COVID-19 & Future Scenario
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During the Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers' Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion

7. By Product Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Product Type
7.2. Large bone orthopedic power tools *
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Small bone orthopedic power tools
7.4. High speed orthopedic power tools
7.5. Orthopedic reamers

8. By Technology

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
8.2. Pneumatic powered systems *
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Battery-operated systems
8.4. Electric powered systems

9. By End-User

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
9.2. Hospitals *
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. Orthopedic clinics
9.4. Ambulatory surgical centers
9.5. Others

10. By Region

10.1. Introduction
- 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
10.2. North America
- 10.2.1. Introduction
- 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.2.6.1. The U.S.
  - 10.2.6.2. Canada
  - 10.2.6.3. Mexico
10.3. Europe
- 10.3.1. Introduction
- 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.3.6.1. Germany
  - 10.3.6.2. The U.K.
  - 10.3.6.3. France
  - 10.3.6.4. Italy
  - 10.3.6.5. Spain
  - 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
10.4. South America
- 10.4.1. Introduction
- 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.4.6.1. Brazil
  - 10.4.6.2. Argentina
  - 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
10.5. Asia-Pacific
- 10.5.1. Introduction
- 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.5.6.1. China
  - 10.5.6.2. India
  - 10.5.6.3. Japan
  - 10.5.6.4. Australia
  - 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
10.6. Middle East and Africa
- 10.6.1. Introduction
- 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
- 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

11.1. Competitive Scenario
11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

12.1. Zimmer Biomet *
- 12.1.1. Company Overview
- 12.1.2. Product Type Portfolio and Description
- 12.1.3. Financial Overview
- 12.1.4. Key Developments
12.2. CONMED Corporation
12.3. Stryker Inc
12.4. DePuy Synthes (J&J)
12.5. Medtronic
12.6. Misonix Inc
12.7. Aesculap, Inc (B. Braun)
12.8. Portescap
12.9. Brasseler USA
12.10. Maxon

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE