全球量子電腦市場：誰將引領潮流？

本報告深入分析了全球量子電腦市場，重點介紹了全球13家提供全端量子電腦解決方案的領導者的策略概況，並基於新開發的評估系統進行了比較分析。

目錄

第一章：本報告的目標與定義

• 引言
  • 基準測試：替代方案
  • 本報告中所使用的電腦比較方法
• 電腦製造商
  • 未涵蓋的公司
• 量子雲公司
• 比較和其他考慮因素

第二章：公司簡介

• 引言
• 富士通（日本）
  • 歷史
  • 機器發展：超導與鑽石自旋
  • 我們的視角
• Google量子人工智慧（美國）
  • 產品與技術發展
  • QuEra 投資
  • 我們的觀點
• IBM（美國）
  • 歷史
  • 銷售與生產：QC 與 QPU
  • Qiskit
  • IBM、雲端和訪問
  • 我們的觀點
• IonQ（美國）
  • 融資輪次
  • IonQ 的產品線與技術
  • 近期技術發展
  • 近期收購
  • 客戶和合作夥伴
  • 我們的觀點
• IQM（芬蘭）
  • 產品工程與路線圖
  • 客戶
  • 我們的觀點
• 微軟（美國）
  • Marjorana 1 晶片和拓樸量子位元
  • Atom 與計算領域的合作
  • 與Quantinuum的合作
  • 與 Photonic 的合作
  • 微軟的 Quantum 軟體
  • 建構客戶群
  • 我們的觀點
• Pasqal（法國）
  • 路線圖
  • 軟體及其他產品
  • 合作夥伴、客戶及定價
  • 收購
  • 我們的觀點
• PsiQuantum 公司（美國）
  • 融資
  • 計算機、晶片及技術
  • 我們的視角
• Quantinuum（美國）
  • Quantinuum 產品及技術
  • 客戶及合作夥伴
  • 我們的視角
• QuEra（美國）
  • 融資及基準測試
  • 產品
  • 合作夥伴和客戶
  • 我們的視角
• Rigetti（美國）
  • 歷史
  • 資金和財務
  • 產品與技術
  • 存取和雲
  • 製造
  • 客戶
  • 雲端服務
  • 我們的視角
• Xanadu（加拿大）
  • 電腦產品線歷史
  • 資金
  • Aurora
  • 其他計算機
  • 技術
  • 軟體
  • 製造
  • 合作夥伴關係
  • 規劃中的資料中心與網絡
  • 我們的視角

第三章 雲端與接取

• 引言
• Amazon Braket）
  • Ocelot QPU
  • Amazon 雲端產品
  • Amazon Braket SDK
  • 最終用戶
• Azure Quantum（Microsoft）
  • Azure Quantum 雲端定價
• Google Cloud
  • 定價
  • 使用 Gmail
• qBraid
• Strangeworks

第四章 區別與比較

• 主要供應商有哪些？如何描述他們？
• 聲譽/信譽
• 品質控制格式：什麼是 "摩天大樓" 品質管制？
• 機架式/桌上型量子計算機
  • 機架式
  • 桌上型量子計算機
• 基準測試
• 量子位元技術
• 軟體
• 社區與市場
• 網路與分散式運算
• 量子計算領導者的全面評估

關於分析師

In this report we provide 13 strategic profiles of distinguished firms around the world working to provide the quantum computer market with full-stack quantum computers and compare them according to a new rating scheme we constructed. Our assessment approach scheme is unique in that it takes into consideration more than just technical benchmarking and appraises the companies considered on other factors that are just as important to long-term business success.

These factors include: how the firms are viewed by the competition, cloud support and access, software, intellectual property, acquisitions and business development, user communities and marketing efforts, customers and sales, technology and form factors and deployment. Each of the profiles includes a section in which we provide our opinion on the pros and cons of the companies that we are analyzing.

Using our assessment process, we have come up with the top four quantum computer companies currently operating in North America, Europe and Japan. And as an added bonus we include a thorough analysis of the quantum cloud sector and pricing of both the cloud services and (as far as possible) the machines themselves.

This report will be highly valuable to quantum hardware and software makers, the investment community, journalists and quantum users themselves.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Goals and Definitions of this Report

• 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.1.1 Benchmarking: An Alternative
  • 1.1.2 The Approach to Comparing Computers Used in this Report
• 1.2 Computer Makers
  • 1.2.1 Firms Not Covered
• 1.3 Quantum Cloud Firms
• 1.4 Comparisons and Other Matters

Chapter 2: Company Profiles

• 2.1 Introduction
• 2.2 Fujitsu (Japan)
  • 2.2.1 History
  • 2.2.2 Development of Machines: Superconducting and Diamond Spin
  • 2.2.3 Our Opinion
• 2.3 Google Quantum AI (United States)
  • 2.3.1 Product and Technology Development
  • 2.3.2 Investment in QuEra
  • 2.3.3 Our Opinion
• 2.4 IBM (United States)
  • 2.4.1 History
  • 2.4.2 Sales and Production: QCs and QPUs
  • 2.4.3 Qiskit
  • 2.4.4 IBM, Clouds and Access
  • 2.4.5 Our Opinion
• 2.5 IonQ (United States)
  • 2.5.1 Funding Rounds
  • 2.5.2 IonQ Product Range and Technologies
  • 2.5.3 Recent Technology Developments
  • 2.5.4 Recent Acquisitions
  • 2.5.5 Customers and Partners
  • 2.5.6 Our Opinion
• 2.6 IQM (Finland)
  • 2.6.1 Product Engineering and Roadmap
  • 2.6.2 Customers
  • 2.6.3 Our Opinion
• 2.7 Microsoft (United States)
  • 2.7.1 The Marjorana 1 Chip and Topological Qubits
  • 2.7.2 Alliance with Atom Computing
  • 2.7.3 Alliance with Quantinuum
  • 2.7.4 Alliance with Photonic
  • 2.7.5 Microsoft's Quantum Software
  • 2.7.6 Building the Customer Base
  • 2.7.7 Our Opinions
• 2.8 Pasqal (France)
  • 2.8.1 Roadmap
  • 2.8.2 Software and Other Products
  • 2.8.3 Partners, Customers and Pricing
  • 2.8.4 Acquisitions
  • 2.8.5 Our Opinion
• 2.9 PsiQuantum, Corp. (United States)
  • 2.9.1 Funding
  • 2.9.2 Computers, Chips and Technology
  • 2.9.3 Our Opinion
• 2.10 Quantinuum (United States)
  • 2.10.1 Quantinuum Products and Technology
  • 2.10.2 Customers and Partners
  • 2.10.3 Our Opinion
• 2.11 QuEra (United States)
  • 2.11.1 Funding and Benchmarking
  • 2.11.2 Products
  • 2.11.3 Partners and Customers
  • 2.11.4 Our Opinion
• 2.12 Rigetti (United States)
  • 2.12.1 History
  • 2.12.2 Funding and Financials
  • 2.12.3 Products and Technology
  • 2.12.4 Access and Clouds
  • 2.12.5 Manufacturing
  • 2.12.6 Customers
  • 2.12.7 Cloud Services
  • 2.12.8 Our Opinion
• 2.13 Xanadu (Canada)
  • 2.13.1 History of Computer Line
  • 2.13.2 Funding
  • 2.13.3 Aurora
  • 2.13.4 Other Computers
  • 2.13.5 Technology
  • 2.13.6 Software
  • 2.13.7 Manufacturing
  • 2.13.8 Alliances
  • 2.13.9 Planned Data Center and Networking
  • 2.13.10 Our Opinion

Chapter 3: Clouds and Access

• 3.1 Introduction
• 3.2 Amazon Web Services (Amazon Braket)
  • 3.2.1 The Ocelot QPU
  • 3.2.2 Amazon Cloud Offerings
  • 3.2.3 Amazon Braket SDK
  • 3.2.4 End Users
• 3.3 Azure Quantum (Microsoft)
  • 3.3.1 Pricing of Azure Quantum Cloud
• 3.4 Google Cloud
  • 3.4.1 Pricing
  • 3.4.2 Use of Gmail
• 3.5 qBraid
• 3.6 Strangeworks

Chapter 4: Distinctions and Comparisons

• 4.1 Who Are the Top Suppliers and How Can we Tell?
• 4.2 Reputation/Notoriety
• 4.3 QC Formats: "Skyscraper" QCs?
• 4.4 Rack-Mounted and Desktop Quantum Computers
  • 4.4.1 Rack-Mounted
  • 4.4.2 Desktop QCs
• 4.5 Benchmarking
• 4.6 Qubit Technology
• 4.7 Software
• 4.8 Communities and Marketing
• 4.9 Networking and Distributed Computing
• 4.10 Overall Appraisal of Quantum Computing Leaders

About the Analyst

List of Exhibits

• Exhibit 4-1: "Quantum Point" Meanings
• Exhibit 4-2: Which Companies do QC Firms Most Name as Competitors?
• Exhibit 4-3: Rating of Companies by Multiple Aspects
• Exhibit 4-4: Ranking of Quantum Computing Leaders