查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1948746

石油和天然氣產業電動潛水泵（ESP）市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測：按應用、運作方式、地區和競爭格局分類，2021-2031年

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP), in Oil and Gas Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Application (Onshore, offshore), By Operation (Single Stage, Multistage), By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F
出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 180 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

簡介目錄

全球石油和天然氣用電動潛水泵 (ESP) 市場預計將從 2025 年的 78.1 億美元成長到 2031 年的 123.1 億美元，複合年成長率為 7.88%。

電潛泵（ESP）是一種安裝在井眼中的專用多級離心式幫浦系統，旨在將中等至大量的流體從油井輸送到地面。其市場主要促進因素是提高老舊成熟油田採收率的內在需求，以及從深水和傳統型油藏高效、大容量儲存的營運要求。這些促進因素構成了在自然減壓環境下維持全球能源生產的基本基礎設施需求，而非暫時的技術變革。

市場概覽
預測期 2027-2031
市場規模：2025年 78.1億美元
市場規模：2031年 123.1億美元
複合年成長率：2026-2031年 7.88%
成長最快的細分市場 多階段
最大的市場 北美洲

業界近期的技術發展重點凸顯了對電潛泵（ESP）技術的依賴。根據石油工程師協會（SPE）預測，2024年各大石油技術大會上，64%的人工抽油技術報告將聚焦於電潛泵，顯示業界明顯傾向採用此方法而非其他方案。然而，市場擴張仍面臨諸多障礙，包括泵浦故障、複雜油井作業帶來的高昂營運成本，尤其是在高氣油比和存在磨蝕性固態的惡劣環境下。

市場促進因素

成熟枯竭油藏的再生是市場的主要驅動力，由此產生了高容量人工抽油系統的需求，以應對自然降血壓。隨著主要採油階段的結束，業者不得不使用這些泵浦來維持永續性，尤其是在現有油田，需要大規模的流體抽取能力來應對不斷增加的排水量。這一趨勢在巴西尤為明顯，該國正在實施大規模的油井干預措施以延長資產壽命。根據貝克休斯公司於2024年4月發布的2024年第一季財報，該公司已與巴西石油公司（Petrobras）簽訂契約，將在Baiaterra叢集的450口油井中安裝電潛泵。這表明，對於面臨產量大幅下降風險的現有儲存而言，電潛泵對於維持產量至關重要。

此外，傳統型油氣開發的擴張對潛水泵解決方案產生了顯著需求。這些儲存初期採收率下降迅速，含水量高，因此，能夠處理磨蝕性固態和應對流量波動的泵送系統至關重要。因此，二疊紀盆地等主要盆地的營運商正依靠電潛泵（ESP）來確保長期穩定的生產。根據美國能源資訊署（EIA）2024年10月發布的《鑽井生產力報告》，二疊紀盆地的原油日產量預計將達到約650萬桶，將產生大規模的基礎設施需求。這種營運需求反映在主要設備供應商的財務表現；SLB於2024年10月發布的2024年第三季公佈財報，其生產系統業務的收入為31億美元。這主要得益於人工泵送設備的銷售，凸顯了該技術在最佳化傳統型地層採收率方面發揮的關鍵作用。

市場挑戰

全球電潛泵（ESP）市場成長的主要障礙是頻繁的泵浦故障導致營運成本飆升，進而引發昂貴且複雜的井下作業。在瓦斯比高、有磨蝕性固態的惡劣礦區環境中，電潛泵系統容易發生氣鎖和機械應力，進而顯著縮短其運作。這種可靠性問題對營運商構成重大的經濟障礙，因為意外停機造成的經濟損失以及需要大型作業鑽機來回收地下設備的費用往往超過系統的初始投資效益。因此，上游企業通常不願意在技術難度高或獲利能力的資產上使用電潛泵，因為這些資產的利潤率太低，無法承受這些不定期的維護成本。

這種運作穩定性的缺失迫使營運商選擇效率較低但更可靠的替代方案，從而阻礙了市場擴張。近期行業績效指標凸顯了可靠性問題的嚴重性。根據石油工程師協會 (SPE) 的數據，2024 年全球前四分之一的電潛泵 (ESP) 故障率為 10.8%。這一數字表明，即使在最佳化的運行環境下，預計仍會出現較高的故障率，這意味著行業平均故障率甚至更高。如此高的故障率直接導致每桶原油開採成本上升，造成財務不確定性，阻礙了對成本敏感的傳統型儲存採用電潛泵技術。

市場趨勢

永磁馬達 (PMM) 技術正在逐步取代感應馬達。 PMM 技術能夠提供效率更高、功率密度更大的系統。透過使用稀土元素磁鐵消除勵磁損耗，PMM 可顯著降低發熱量，從而能夠在更窄的井筒中運作。這項技術進步直接降低了人工抽油的能耗，同時也提高了熱儲存的可靠性。其經濟效益十分顯著。根據貝克休斯公司 2024 年 3 月發布的案例研究《整合生產解決方案使二疊紀盆地油井產量翻番，每月電力成本減半》，Magneficient 公司的 PMM 技術的應用使一家運營商僅在電力成本方面每月就節省了約 4,000 美元。

同時，人工智慧驅動的預測性維護模型的整合，正透過利用即時數據進行故障預測，從而變革營運策略。營運商現在利用分析溫度和振動波動的演算法，動態調整泵浦參數，避免被動維修。這種主動策略減輕了意外停機造成的經濟損失，並最大限度地延長了設備的使用壽命。這項創新技術的優勢顯而易見。根據紐約石油研究院 (NYBL) 2024 年 6 月發布的報告《透過人工智慧驅動的電潛泵運行參數最佳化提高石油產量》，liftAI 技術的應用表明，透過先進的故障預測，泵浦的使用壽命最多可延長 20%。

目錄

第1章概述

第2章：調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章：客戶心聲

第5章：全球油氣產業電動潛水幫浦（ESP）市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按金額
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 依應用方式（陸地、海洋）
    • 依操作方法（單級、多級）
    • 按地區
    • 按公司（2025 年）
  • 市場地圖

第6章：北美油氣產業電動潛水幫浦（ESP）市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 北美洲：國別分析
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

第7章：歐洲油氣應用電動潛水幫浦（ESP）市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 歐洲：國別分析
    • 德國
    • 法國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 西班牙

第8章：亞太地區油氣市場電動潛水幫浦（ESP）展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 亞太地區：國別分析
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韓國
    • 澳洲

第9章：中東和非洲石油天然氣產業電動潛水泵（ESP）市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 中東與非洲：國別分析
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 南非

第10章：南美洲油氣產業電動潛水幫浦（ESP）市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 南美洲：國別分析
    • 巴西
    • 哥倫比亞
    • 阿根廷

第11章 市場動態

  • 促進因素
  • 任務

第12章 市場趨勢與發展

  • 併購
  • 產品發布
  • 近期趨勢

第13章：全球油氣產業電動潛水幫浦（ESP）市場：SWOT分析

第14章：波特五力分析

  • 產業競爭
  • 新進入者的潛力
  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 顧客權力
  • 替代品的威脅

第15章 競爭格局

  • Schlumberger Limited
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • Weatherford International plc
  • Levare International Limited
  • Novomet
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Atlas Copco AB
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Flowserve Corporation

第16章 策略建議

第17章：關於研究公司及免責聲明

簡介目錄
Product Code: 23150

The Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market is projected to expand from USD 7.81 Billion in 2025 to USD 12.31 Billion by 2031, reflecting a CAGR of 7.88%. Functioning as a specialized multistage centrifugal pump system installed downhole, the ESP is designed to transport moderate to substantial volumes of fluids from wellbores to the surface. The market's primary catalyst is the essential need to boost recovery rates from aging mature fields, coupled with the operational requirement for efficient, high-volume extraction in deepwater and unconventional reservoirs. These drivers constitute fundamental infrastructural necessities for maintaining global energy output amidst natural pressure declines, rather than representing temporary technological shifts.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2027-2031
Market Size 2025USD 7.81 Billion
Market Size 2031USD 12.31 Billion
CAGR 2026-20317.88%
Fastest Growing SegmentMultistage
Largest MarketNorth America

This dependence on ESP technology is highlighted by recent technical priorities within the industry. According to the Society of Petroleum Engineers, in 2024, 64% of technical submissions concerning artificial lift at major conferences were dedicated to Electric Submersible Pumps, indicating a distinct sector preference for this method over other options. Despite this, a major obstacle hindering wider market growth persists in the form of high operational costs linked to pump failures and complicated well interventions, especially within harsh environments characterized by high gas-to-oil ratios or abrasive solids.

Market Driver

The rehabilitation of mature and depleted oil reservoirs serves as a leading market driver, requiring high-volume artificial lift systems to counteract natural pressure reduction. As primary recovery phases end, operators are compelled to utilize these pumps to sustain economic feasibility, especially in legacy fields where significant fluid lifting capacity is needed to manage rising water cuts. This trend was clearly demonstrated in Brazil, where extensive interventions are being applied to prolong asset life. According to Baker Hughes, April 2024, in the 'First Quarter 2024 Results', the firm won a contract from Petrobras to install electrical submersible pumps in 450 wells within the Bahia-Terra cluster, illustrating how ESPs are crucial for maintaining output in established reservoirs facing potential steep declines.

Additionally, the growth of unconventional shale developments generates significant demand for submersible pumping solutions. Because these reservoirs face rapid initial decline rates and high water volumes, they necessitate lift systems capable of handling abrasive solids and variable flow rates. As a result, operators in major basins such as the Permian depend on ESPs to ensure stable long-term production. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, October 2024, in the 'Drilling Productivity Report', oil production in the Permian region was anticipated to hit roughly 6.5 million barrels per day, driving substantial infrastructure needs. This operational demand mirrors the financial results of leading equipment suppliers; according to SLB, October 2024, in the 'Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Release', Production Systems revenue hit USD 3.1 billion, fueled largely by artificial lift sales, highlighting the technology's essential role in optimizing recovery from unconventional formations.

Market Challenge

The principal obstacle restricting the growth of the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) market is the elevated operational expenditure caused by frequent pump failures and the subsequent necessity for expensive, complex well interventions. Within harsh extraction settings defined by high gas-to-oil ratios or abrasive solids, ESP systems are susceptible to gas locking and mechanical stress, which drastically reduces their operational lifespan. This reliability concern establishes a significant economic hurdle for operators, as the financial costs of unplanned downtime and the need for heavy workover rigs to recover downhole equipment often exceed the system's initial capital efficiency. As a result, upstream companies are often discouraged from utilizing ESPs in technically challenging or marginal assets where profit margins are too thin to absorb these erratic maintenance expenses.

This lack of operational stability restricts the market's reach by compelling operators to opt for alternatives that may be less volume-efficient but offer greater robustness. The gravity of this reliability issue is evident in recent industry performance metrics. According to the Society of Petroleum Engineers, in 2024, the global top-quartile benchmark for ESP failure indices stood at 10.8%. This figure suggests that even the most optimized operations expect a notable frequency of failure, implying that the wider industry average is significantly higher. Such high failure rates lead directly to increased lifting costs per barrel, creating financial uncertainty that impedes the widespread implementation of ESP technology in cost-conscious unconventional reservoirs.

Market Trends

The shift toward Permanent Magnet Motor (PMM) technology is displacing induction motors by providing systems with enhanced efficiency and power density. By employing rare-earth magnets to negate excitation losses, PMMs drastically lower heat production and facilitate operations within slimmer wellbores. This advancement directly decreases the energy intensity of artificial lift while bolstering reliability in thermal reservoirs. The economic advantage is distinct; according to Baker Hughes, March 2024, in the 'Integrated production solution doubled production, cut monthly electric costs in half in Permian wells' case study, the utilization of Magnefficient PMM technology allowed an operator to save roughly USD 4,000 per month in electricity expenses alone.

Concurrently, the incorporation of AI-driven predictive maintenance models is reshaping operational strategies by leveraging real-time data to predict failures. Operators are now utilizing algorithms that examine temperature and vibration variances to dynamically modify pump parameters, thereby preventing reactive repairs. This forward-looking strategy mitigates the financial repercussions of unplanned downtime and maximizes asset durability. The merit of this innovation is measurable; according to nybl, June 2024, in the 'Enhance Oil Production by Optimizing ESP Operating Parameters Using AI' report, the application of liftAI technology showed the ability to prolong pump lifespan by up to 20% via advanced failure prediction.

Key Market Players

  • Schlumberger Limited
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • Weatherford International plc
  • Levare International Limited
  • Novomet
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Atlas Copco AB
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Flowserve Corporation

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Application

  • Onshore
  • offshore

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Operation

  • Single Stage
  • Multistage

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Region

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Application (Onshore, offshore)
    • 5.2.2. By Operation (Single Stage, Multistage)
    • 5.2.3. By Region
    • 5.2.4. By Company (2025)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Application
    • 6.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.2.3. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.3.2. Canada Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Operation

7. Europe Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Application
    • 7.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.2.3. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.2. France Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.4. Italy Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.5. Spain Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Operation

8. Asia Pacific Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Application
    • 8.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.2.3. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.2. India Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.3. Japan Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.5. Australia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Operation

9. Middle East & Africa Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Application
    • 9.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.2.3. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.3.2. UAE Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Operation

10. South America Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Application
    • 10.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.2.3. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Operation

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Schlumberger Limited
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. Baker Hughes Company
  • 15.3. Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • 15.4. Weatherford International plc
  • 15.5. Levare International Limited
  • 15.6. Novomet
  • 15.7. Grundfos Holding A/S
  • 15.8. Atlas Copco AB
  • 15.9. Sulzer Ltd.
  • 15.10. Flowserve Corporation

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer