查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1914565

網路安全策略管理市場 - 全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會及預測（按組件、企業規模、解決方案、最終用戶、地區和競爭格局分類，2021-2031 年）

Network Security Policy Management Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Component, By Enterprise Size, By Solution, By End User, By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F
出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 185 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

簡介目錄

全球網路安全策略管理市場預計將從 2025 年的 32.8 億美元成長到 2031 年的 63.5 億美元，複合年成長率為 11.64%。

網路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 解決方案可讓組織自動建立、審核和分析混合 IT 環境中的安全規則，從而確保合規性並降低風險。該技術提供集中式可視性，簡化複雜的防火牆策略，並消除冗餘控制。推動市場發展的關鍵因素是網路生態系統的日益複雜化，雲端和本地基礎設施的整合需要統一的管理來防止安全漏洞。此外，減少手動配置錯誤和遵守嚴格的資料保護標準的迫切需求也在加速這些自動化平台的普及。

市場概覽
預測期 2027-2031
市場規模：2025年 32.8億美元
市場規模：2031年 63.5億美元
複合年成長率：2026-2031年 11.64%
成長最快的細分市場 銀行、金融服務和保險（BFSI）
最大的市場 北美洲

然而，由於缺乏實施和監管這些先進系統所需的專業技術人員，市場成長受到嚴重阻礙。由於缺乏足夠的技術專長，企業往往難以將網路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 工具有效地整合到其原有架構中，造成實施瓶頸。根據 ISC2 預測，到 2024 年，全球網路安全人才缺口將接近 480 萬，凸顯了嚴重的人才缺口，這限制了企業維護和管理全面安全策略框架的能力。

市場促進因素

混合多重雲端IT基礎設施的快速擴張是全球網路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 市場的主要驅動力。隨著企業將資產分佈在本地資料中心和公共雲端平台之間，維護一致的安全態勢的複雜性顯著增加。 NSPM 工具對於協調這些分散式環境中的規則至關重要，它能確保安全意圖準確反映在技術配置中，同時又不影響連結性。根據 Flexera 2024 年 3 月發布的《雲端狀態報告》，89% 的受訪者表示他們擁有多重雲端策略。這種廣泛的應用需要一個集中式管理平台來彌合傳統硬體和動態雲端資源之間的營運差距，​​從而推動了對統一策略可見性的需求。

此外，自動化在消除手動配置錯誤方面的重要性日益凸顯，這正在加速這些解決方案的普及。傳統的防火牆規則修改方法耗時費力，且容易出錯，從而暴露安全漏洞並導致網路中斷。 NSPM 平台透過自動化變更請求並在實施前根據合規性標準驗證檢驗，來降低這些風險。根據泰雷茲發布的《2024 年資料威脅報告》（2024 年 3 月），31% 的受訪者認為人為錯誤是資料外洩的主要原因。這些疏忽造成的經濟損失不斷增加，迫使企業優先考慮透過技術手段減少錯誤。 IBM 預測，到 2024 年，全球資料外洩的平均成本將達到 488 萬美元，凸顯了自動化和精準保全行動的迫切經濟意義。

市場挑戰

網路安全專業人才短缺是全球網路安全策略管理市場成長的主要障礙。儘管策略管理平台透過自動化簡化了操作，但仍需要具備相關知識的操作人員來定義架構、檢驗規則變更並解讀合規性審核。當企業面臨合格人員短缺時，現有團隊會被日常工作壓得喘不過氣來，缺乏資源部署和管理新的管治工具。這種人力資源限制導致企業無法確保平台正常運作所需的監管，迫使他們推遲採購決策或限制採用範圍。

人才短缺直接影響市場收入，導致銷售週期延長，中大型企業對策略管理軟體的採用率降低。企業往往難以證明投資現有員工無法有效使用的工具的合理性。根據ISACA預測，到2024年，57%的組織將面臨網路安全團隊人手不足的問題。這種普遍存在的人才短缺限制了企業擴展安全基礎設施的能力，並阻礙了更廣泛的市場擴張，因為企業優先考慮的是維持基本運營，而不是部署專業的策略管理解決方案。

市場趨勢

隨著企業從基於邊界的防禦轉向以身分為中心的檢驗模型，零信任網路存取(ZTNA) 框架的採用正在迅速改變全球網路安全策略管理市場。這種模式轉移需要一個動態策略引擎，能夠在授予特定應用程式存取權限之前持續驗證使用者和裝置的身份，從而限制在受損網路中的橫向移動。隨著企業將資源分佈在各種不同的環境中，傳統防火牆的靜態規則正逐漸過時，需要能夠根據即時風險評估進行調整的細微、情境感知策略控制。根據 Zscaler 發布的《2025 年 1 月網路威脅與防禦情勢報告》，81% 的企業已將零信任原則作為其網路安全戰略的基礎，這極大地推動了對能夠統一和管理這些嚴格檢驗通訊協定的平台的需求。

同時，將人工智慧 (AI) 整合到策略最佳化中對於應對現代威脅環境的規模和速度至關重要。安全團隊正在加速採用 AI 驅動的工具，以實現對龐大規則集的自動化分析、識別冗餘並預測人工審核可能遺漏的潛在漏洞。保護新興技術以及彌合快速開發週期與安全管治之間差距的需求進一步推動了這一趨勢。根據 Palo Alto Networks 於 2025 年 12 月發布的《2025 年雲端安全報告》，99% 的組織在過去一年中至少遭受過一次針對其 AI 系統的網路攻擊，這凸顯了構建智慧自動化策略框架的緊迫性，這些框架能夠保護這些複雜的高價值資產免受高級攻擊。

目錄

第1章概述

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章：客戶評價

5. 全球網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按金額
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 依元件分類（軟體（雲端、本機部署）、服務（專業服務、主機服務））
    • 依公司規模（中小企業、大型企業）
    • 按解決方案分類（安全策略管理、變更管理系統、網路合規策略、風險和漏洞評估、其他）
    • 按最終用戶分類（IT和電信、能源和公共產業、零售、製造和醫療保健、銀行、金融服務和保險（BFSI）、醫療保健、其他）
    • 按地區
    • 按公司（2025 年）
  • 市場地圖

6. 北美網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 北美洲：國家分析
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

7. 歐洲網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 歐洲：國家分析
    • 德國
    • 法國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 西班牙

8. 亞太地區網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 亞太地區：國家分析
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韓國
    • 澳洲

9. 中東與非洲網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 中東和非洲：國家分析
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 南非

10. 南美洲網路安全策略管理市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
  • 市佔率及預測
  • 南美洲：國家分析
    • 巴西
    • 哥倫比亞
    • 阿根廷

第11章 市場動態

  • 促進要素
  • 任務

第12章 市場趨勢與發展

  • 併購
  • 產品發布
  • 最新進展

13. 全球網路安全策略管理市場：SWOT 分析

第14章：波特五力分析

  • 產業競爭
  • 新進入者的可能性
  • 供應商電力
  • 顧客權力
  • 替代品的威脅

第15章 競爭格局

  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • AlgoSec Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • FireMon, LLC.
  • Forcepoint LLC
  • IBM Corporation
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.

第16章 策略建議

第17章：關於研究公司及免責聲明

簡介目錄
Product Code: 3675

The Global Network Security Policy Management Market is projected to expand from USD 3.28 Billion in 2025 to USD 6.35 Billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 11.64%. Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) solutions allow organizations to automate the generation, auditing, and analysis of security rules across hybrid IT landscapes, ensuring regulatory compliance and mitigating risks. This technology offers centralized visibility to simplify intricate firewall policies and remove redundant controls. The market is primarily driven by the increasing complexity of network ecosystems, where the convergence of cloud and on-premise infrastructures requires unified management to prevent security gaps. Furthermore, the critical need to reduce manual configuration errors and strictly adhere to data protection standards accelerates the adoption of these automation platforms.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2027-2031
Market Size 2025USD 3.28 Billion
Market Size 2031USD 6.35 Billion
CAGR 2026-203111.64%
Fastest Growing SegmentBanking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
Largest MarketNorth America

However, market growth is significantly hindered by an acute shortage of skilled professionals needed to implement and oversee these sophisticated systems. Organizations frequently struggle to integrate NSPM tools effectively into legacy architectures without sufficient technical expertise, creating a bottleneck in adoption. According to ISC2, the global cybersecurity workforce gap reached nearly 4.8 million professionals in 2024, highlighting a severe talent deficit that restricts the ability of enterprises to maintain and manage comprehensive security policy frameworks.

Market Driver

The rapid expansion of hybrid and multi-cloud IT infrastructures acts as a primary catalyst for the Global Network Security Policy Management Market. As enterprises disperse assets across on-premise data centers and public cloud platforms, the complexity of maintaining consistent security postures increases significantly. NSPM tools are essential for orchestrating rules across these fragmented environments, ensuring that security intents are accurately translated into technical configurations without disrupting connectivity. According to Flexera, March 2024, in the 'State of the Cloud Report', 89% of respondents reported having a multi-cloud strategy. This widespread adoption necessitates centralized management platforms capable of bridging the operational gap between legacy hardware and dynamic cloud resources, driving the demand for unified policy visibility.

Furthermore, the critical need for automation to eliminate manual configuration errors accelerates the deployment of these solutions. Traditional methods of modifying firewall rules are labor-intensive and prone to mistakes that create vulnerabilities or cause network outages. NSPM platforms mitigate these risks by automating change requests and validating policies against compliance baselines before implementation. According to Thales, March 2024, in the '2024 Data Threat Report', human error was identified as the leading cause of data breaches by 31% of respondents. The financial stakes of such oversights are rising, compelling organizations to prioritize error reduction through technological intervention. According to IBM, in 2024, the global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million, highlighting the urgent economic requirement for automated and accurate security operations.

Market Challenge

The shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals constitutes a primary impediment to the growth of the Global Network Security Policy Management Market. While policy management platforms utilize automation to streamline operations, they require knowledgeable human operators to define architecture, validate rule changes, and interpret compliance audits. When enterprises face a scarcity of qualified personnel, existing teams become overwhelmed by daily operational tasks and lack the bandwidth to implement or manage new governance tools. This resource constraint causes organizations to delay purchasing decisions or limit the scope of their deployments, as they cannot guarantee the necessary oversight for these platforms to function correctly.

This talent deficit directly impacts market revenue by extending sales cycles and reducing the adoption rate of policy management software among mid-sized and large enterprises. Companies frequently struggle to justify investments in tools that their current workforce cannot effectively utilize. According to ISACA, in 2024, 57% of organizations reported that their cybersecurity teams were understaffed. This widespread lack of available talent restricts the ability of businesses to scale their security infrastructure, thereby stalling the broader expansion of the market as firms prioritize maintaining basic operations over adopting specialized policy management solutions.

Market Trends

The Adoption of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Frameworks is rapidly reshaping the Global Network Security Policy Management Market as organizations move beyond perimeter-based defenses to identity-centric verification models. This paradigm shift requires dynamic policy engines capable of continuously authenticating users and devices before granting access to specific applications, thereby limiting lateral movement within compromised networks. As enterprises distribute resources across diverse environments, the static rules of traditional firewalls are becoming obsolete, necessitating granular, context-aware policy controls that adapt to real-time risk assessments. According to Zscaler, January 2025, in the 'State of Cyberthreats and Protection Report', 81% of organizations are now adopting zero trust principles as the cornerstone of their cybersecurity strategies, underscoring the critical demand for management platforms that can orchestrate these rigorous verification protocols.

Simultaneously, the Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Policy Optimization is becoming indispensable for managing the scale and velocity of modern threat landscapes. Security teams are increasingly deploying AI-driven tools to automate the analysis of vast rule sets, identifying redundancies and predicting potential vulnerabilities that manual auditing would miss. This trend is accelerated by the need to secure emerging technologies and close the gap between rapid development cycles and security governance. According to Palo Alto Networks, December 2025, in the 'State of Cloud Security Report 2025', 99% of organizations experienced at least one cyberattack on their AI systems within the past year, highlighting the urgent necessity for intelligent, automated policy frameworks capable of defending these complex and high-value assets against sophisticated exploitations.

Key Market Players

  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • AlgoSec Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • FireMon, LLC.
  • Forcepoint LLC
  • IBM Corporation
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Network Security Policy Management Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Component

  • Software (Cloud-based, On-premise)
  • Services (Professional Services, Managed Services)

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Enterprise Size

  • Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Large Enterprises

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Solution

  • Security Policy Management
  • Change Management System
  • Network Compliance Policy
  • Risk & Vulnerability Assessment
  • Others

Network Security Policy Management Market, By End User

  • IT & Telecom
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Retail
  • Manufacturing & Healthcare
  • Banking
  • Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
  • Healthcare
  • Others

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Region

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Network Security Policy Management Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Network Security Policy Management Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Component (Software (Cloud-based, On-premise), Services (Professional Services, Managed Services))
    • 5.2.2. By Enterprise Size (Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Large Enterprises)
    • 5.2.3. By Solution (Security Policy Management, Change Management System, Network Compliance Policy, Risk & Vulnerability Assessment, Others)
    • 5.2.4. By End User (IT & Telecom, Energy & Utilities, Retail, Manufacturing & Healthcare, Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI), Healthcare, Others)
    • 5.2.5. By Region
    • 5.2.6. By Company (2025)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Component
    • 6.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 6.2.3. By Solution
    • 6.2.4. By End User
    • 6.2.5. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 6.3.2. Canada Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.3.2.4. By End User

7. Europe Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Component
    • 7.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 7.2.3. By Solution
    • 7.2.4. By End User
    • 7.2.5. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.2. France Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.3.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.4. Italy Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.4.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.5. Spain Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.5.2.4. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Component
    • 8.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 8.2.3. By Solution
    • 8.2.4. By End User
    • 8.2.5. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.2. India Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.3. Japan Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.3.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.4.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.5. Australia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.5.2.4. By End User

9. Middle East & Africa Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Component
    • 9.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 9.2.3. By Solution
    • 9.2.4. By End User
    • 9.2.5. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 9.3.2. UAE Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.3.2.4. By End User

10. South America Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Component
    • 10.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 10.2.3. By Solution
    • 10.2.4. By End User
    • 10.2.5. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.3.2.4. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Network Security Policy Management Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. AlgoSec Inc.
  • 15.3. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • 15.4. Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • 15.5. FireMon, LLC.
  • 15.6. Forcepoint LLC
  • 15.7. IBM Corporation
  • 15.8. Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • 15.9. Sophos Ltd.
  • 15.10. Cisco Systems, Inc.

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer