農業化學品包裝市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測：按產品類型、材料類型、化學物質、地區和競爭格局分類，2021-2031年

全球農業化學品包裝市場預計將從 2025 年的 49.1 億美元成長到 2031 年的 64.4 億美元，複合年成長率達到 4.62%。

該領域涵蓋各種專用容器解決方案，例如硬質桶、軟包裝袋和中型散貨箱，旨在確保化肥和農藥等農業化學品的安全性和有效性。市場成長趨勢的主要驅動力是全球作物增產需求的不斷成長。這不僅是由於化學投入品使用量的增加，也是由於監管危險品物流的嚴格安全標準所致。根據聯合國糧食及農業組織（糧農組織）的數據，2024年全球農藥使用量達370萬噸，凸顯了需要安全包裝的產品規模之龐大。

然而，市場在環境永續性方面面臨許多挑戰，尤其是受污染塑膠廢棄物的回收和處置流程複雜。建構有效的包裝材料循環經濟框架，特別是針對含有有害化學物質的包裝材料，難度極大；而日益嚴格的減少不可可再生材料的監管要求，也始終是一個棘手的難題。這些挑戰有可能限制市場成長，迫使企業對其供應鏈進行代價高昂的調整，以確保合規性和永續性。

市場促進因素

全球糧食需求不斷成長，由此帶來的作物增產需求是推動農業化學品包裝產業發展的主要動力。隨著農民努力提高收成，營養劑和作物保護劑的使用量也在增加，這推動了對耐用、大容量容器的需求，以確保產品在運輸過程中的穩定性。化學品使用量的增加直接促進了對能夠安全儲存高濃度配方的硬質中型散貨箱和果凍桶的需求。例如，國際肥料協會（IFA）於2024年8月發布的《2024-2028中期肥料展望》報告預測，2024會計年度全球肥料消費量將達到2.037億噸營養當量，凸顯了供應鏈對專用包裝的巨大需求，以確保產品從工廠到農場的安全運輸。

同時，隨著更嚴格的環境法規和向循環經濟模式的轉型，市場動態也在發生變化，推動著永續和可生物分解包裝材料的使用。製造商正逐步從標準高密度聚苯乙烯轉向可堆肥材料和再生塑膠，以減少農業環境中的廢棄物。這項轉變的驅動力來自產業回收舉措，這些計劃強制要求收集和處理廢舊容器。根據CleanFarms於2024年6月發布的2023會計年度年度報告，農民回收了237萬公斤小型空容器，這顯示該產業對回收的承諾。此外，經合組織和聯合國糧農組織預測，截至2024年，未來十年全球農業產量將以每年1.3%的速度成長，因此，永續包裝解決方案需要快速擴展，才能跟上產量持續成長的腳步。

市場挑戰

環境永續性，尤其是在處理受有害殘留物污染的塑膠廢棄物方面，對農藥包裝產業的擴張構成了重大障礙。由於這些容器盛裝危險化學品，無法透過標準的市政回收系統進行處理，因此需要部署高成本且專門的逆向物流網路。由此，製造商被迫在嚴格的法規環境下運營，必須採取高成本的生命週期管理策略以避免環境損害。這種複雜性消耗了原本可用於創新和生產擴張的資金，擠壓了利潤空間，並阻礙了缺乏完善回收基礎設施的地區採用先進的包裝解決方案。

廢棄物管理挑戰的規模之大，體現在需要特殊處理的物料數量龐大。 2024年，農業容器回收委員會（ACRC）報告稱，其在美國已收集了約1,100萬磅高密度聚苯乙烯容器用於回收再生用。這一數字凸顯了處理工業廢棄物所需的龐大營運規模。維持如此大規模的收集網路需要持續為市場帶來經濟負擔，並限制了供應商擴大生產規模以滿足不斷成長的農業需求的速度。

市場趨勢

為了打擊非法農藥貿易的擴張，實施數位化防偽措施正成為生產商的關鍵策略重點。由於假冒偽劣的農作物保護產品威脅農業生產力和品牌聲譽，企業紛紛在其包裝上添加全像標籤、加密QR碼和NFC標籤，以驗證產品的真偽。這種數位化轉型使相關人員能夠即時驗證產品的來源，並保護供應鏈免受危險、不受監管物質的侵害。黑市的規模凸顯了這種轉型的必要性。根據巴西作物生命協會（CropLife Brazil）於2024年2月發布的題為《低價和虛假資訊助長了巴西非法農藥市場》的報告，2022-2023會計年度巴西查獲的非法農藥數量激增至813噸，是上年度查獲量的兩倍多。

同時，市場正普遍轉向使用與封閉式輸送系統 (CTS) 相容的容器，以顯著提高操作效率和工人安全。這一趨勢包括對標準化學品瓶蓋進行改造，使其能夠輕鬆與連接器連接。這使得農民無需打開容器即可將危險液體輸送到噴霧器罐中。這些系統省去了傾倒過程，從而防止液體溢出，顯著減少與濃縮活性成分的直接接觸，並滿足嚴格的職業健康要求。其效果顯著。根據《農民週刊》2024 年 6 月發表的題為「2024 年系列：噴霧器封閉式輸送封閉式在英國上市」的報導報道，與傳統灌裝方法相比，EasyConnect 系統據稱可將噴霧器操作員接觸農藥的風險降低約 95%。

目錄

第1章概述

第2章：調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章：客戶心聲

第5章：全球農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
  • 按金額
• 市佔率及預測
  • 依產品類型（袋裝/包裝袋、瓶裝/容器、桶裝/中型散貨箱、其他）
  • 依材質（紙、塑膠、金屬、其他）
  • 化學品按類型分類（殺蟲劑、殺菌劑、除草劑、肥料、其他）
  • 按地區
  • 按公司（2025 年）
• 市場地圖

第6章：北美農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
• 市佔率及預測
• 北美洲：國別分析
  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

第7章：歐洲農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
• 市佔率及預測
• 歐洲：國別分析
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙

第8章：亞太地區農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
• 市佔率及預測
• 亞太地區：國別分析
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韓國
  • 澳洲

第9章：中東和非洲農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
• 市佔率及預測
• 中東與非洲：國別分析
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
  • 南非

第10章：南美洲農業化學品包裝市場展望

• 市場規模及預測
• 市佔率及預測
• 南美洲：國別分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥倫比亞
  • 阿根廷

第11章 市場動態

• 促進因素
• 任務

第12章 市場趨勢與發展

• 併購
• 產品發布
• 近期趨勢

第13章 全球農業化學品包裝市場：SWOT分析

第14章：波特五力分析

• 產業競爭
• 新進入者的潛力
• 供應商的議價能力
• 顧客權力
• 替代品的威脅

第15章 競爭格局

• SIG Group AG
• Codefine International SA
• Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
• Greif, Inc.
• Amcor plc
• NNZ Group BV
• LC Packaging International BV
• ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
• Nexus Packaging Ltd.
• Mauser Packaging Solutions

第16章 策略建議

第17章：關於研究公司及免責聲明

The Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market is projected to expand from USD 4.91 Billion in 2025 to USD 6.44 Billion by 2031, achieving a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 4.62%. This sector encompasses specialized containment solutions such as rigid drums, flexible pouches, and intermediate bulk containers, all designed to maintain the safety and effectiveness of agrochemicals like fertilizers and pesticides. The market's upward trajectory is primarily underpinned by the growing global need to improve crop yields, which necessitates higher volumes of chemical inputs, as well as strict safety regulations governing the logistics of hazardous materials. Data from the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2024 indicates that global agricultural pesticide usage hit 3.70 million tonnes, underscoring the massive scale of products that require secure packaging.

However, the market faces significant hurdles related to environmental sustainability, specifically regarding the intricate process of recycling and disposing of contaminated plastic waste. Developing effective circular economy frameworks for packaging that has held hazardous chemicals is difficult, and increasing regulatory demands to cut down on non-recyclable materials create ongoing obstacles. These challenges threaten to limit market growth and force companies to make expensive adjustments to their supply chains to ensure compliance and sustainability.

Market Driver

The rising global demand for food and the consequent need for improved crop yields serve as the main engines for growth in the agricultural chemical packaging industry. As farmers aim to get the most out of their land, the use of nutrients and crop protection agents increases, driving the need for durable, large-volume containers that guarantee product stability during transport. This increase in chemical usage directly boosts the demand for rigid intermediate bulk containers and jerry cans capable of holding potent formulations safely. For instance, the International Fertilizer Association's "Medium-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2024-2028" report from August 2024 forecasts that global fertilizer consumption will hit 203.7 million tonnes of nutrients in the 2024 financial year, highlighting the massive supply chain needs for specialized packaging to ensure safe delivery from factories to farms.

Concurrently, the shift towards sustainable and biodegradable packaging materials is altering market dynamics, spurred by strict environmental laws and a move towards circular economy models. Manufacturers are progressively swapping out standard high-density polyethylene for compostable options and post-consumer recycled resins to reduce plastic waste in agricultural environments. This change is backed by industry recovery initiatives that require the collection and processing of used containers. Cleanfarms' "2023 Annual Report", released in June 2024, noted that farmers returned 2.37 million kilograms of small empty containers for recycling, demonstrating the industry's dedication to recovery. Additionally, the OECD and FAO project a 1.3% annual growth in global agricultural production over the next decade as of 2024, suggesting that sustainable packaging solutions must expand quickly to meet this ongoing rise in output.

Market Challenge

Environmental sustainability represents a significant obstacle to the expansion of the agricultural chemical packaging sector, particularly concerning the management of plastic waste contaminated with hazardous residues. Since these containers hold dangerous chemicals, they cannot be processed through standard municipal recycling systems, requiring the implementation of costly and specialized reverse logistics networks. Consequently, manufacturers must operate within a strict regulatory environment that mandates expensive lifecycle management strategies to avoid environmental harm. This complexity drains financial resources that could otherwise be used for innovation and production scaling, thereby squeezing profit margins and hindering the uptake of advanced packaging solutions in areas lacking such recycling infrastructure.

The scale of this waste management challenge is highlighted by the immense volume of materials that need specialized treatment. In 2024, the Ag Container Recycling Council reported collecting roughly 11 million pounds of high-density polyethylene containers for recycling across the United States. This figure emphasizes the massive operational undertaking necessary to handle industry waste. The requirement to sustain these extensive recovery networks imposes a continuous financial burden on the market, restricting the rate at which suppliers can ramp up production to satisfy increasing agricultural demands.

Market Trends

Integrating digital anti-counterfeiting measures is becoming a key strategic focus for manufacturers aiming to fight the growing trade in illegal agrochemicals. With counterfeit and adulterated crop protection products threatening farm productivity and brand reputation, companies are adding holographic tags, encrypted QR codes, and NFC labels to their packaging for authentication purposes. This move towards digitalization enables stakeholders to instantly verify the origin of products, protecting the supply chain from dangerous, unregulated substances. The necessity of this shift is underscored by the size of the black market; a February 2024 report by CropLife Brasil titled "Low Prices and Misinformation Encourage the Illegal Pesticides Market in Brazil" revealed that illegal pesticide seizures in the country jumped to 813 tonnes in the 2022-2023 cycle, more than double the previous period's confiscations.

At the same time, the market is seeing a broad move towards Closed Transfer System (CTS) compatible containers to significantly enhance handling efficiency and operator safety. This trend involves modifying standard chemical closures and caps to connect easily with coupling devices, allowing farmers to move hazardous liquids into sprayer tanks without opening the containers. By removing the pouring step, these systems prevent spills and drastically reduce direct contact with concentrated active ingredients, meeting strict occupational health requirements. The impact is substantial; a June 2024 article in Farmers Weekly, "Cereals 2024: Sprayer closed transfer system starts UK rollout", reported that the easyconnect system reduced sprayer operator exposure to pesticides by about 95% compared to conventional filling methods.

Key Market Players

• SIG Group AG
• Codefine International SA
• Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
• Greif, Inc.
• Amcor plc
• NNZ Group BV
• LC Packaging International BV
• ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
• Nexus Packaging Ltd.
• Mauser Packaging Solutions

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Product Type

• Bags & Pouches
• Bottles & Containers
• Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Material Type

• Paper
• Plastic
• Metal
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Chemical

• Pesticides
• Insecticides
• Herbicides
• Fertilizers
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Region

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Product Type (Bags & Pouches, Bottles & Containers, Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Material Type (Paper, Plastic, Metal, Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Chemical (Pesticides, Insecticides, Herbicides, Fertilizers, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region
  • 5.2.5. By Company (2025)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Product Type
  • 6.2.2. By Material Type
  • 6.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.3.2. Canada Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

7. Europe Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Product Type
  • 7.2.2. By Material Type
  • 7.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.2. France Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.4. Italy Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Chemical

8. Asia Pacific Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Product Type
  • 8.2.2. By Material Type
  • 8.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.2. India Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.3. Japan Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Chemical

9. Middle East & Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Product Type
  • 9.2.2. By Material Type
  • 9.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.3.2. UAE Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

10. South America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Product Type
  • 10.2.2. By Material Type
  • 10.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. SIG Group AG
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Products & Services
  • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. Codefine International SA
• 15.3. Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
• 15.4. Greif, Inc.
• 15.5. Amcor plc
• 15.6. NNZ Group BV
• 15.7. LC Packaging International BV
• 15.8. ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
• 15.9. Nexus Packaging Ltd.
• 15.10. Mauser Packaging Solutions

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer