首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊

IT安全性

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1880518

零信任架構市場預測至 2032 年：按組件、安全功能、身份驗證類型、部署模式、組織規模、最終用戶和地區分類的全球分析

Zero Trust Architecture Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Component (Solutions and Services), Security Capability, Authentication Type, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, End User and By Geography

出版日期: 2025年11月01日 | 出版商:

Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

簡介目錄圖表

根據 Stratistics MRC 的一項研究，預計到 2025 年，全球零信任架構市場價值將達到 405.3 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 1,253.4 億美元，在預測期內的複合年成長率為 17.5%。

零信任架構是一種網路安全模型，其核心理念是預設不應信任任何使用者或設備，而是要求在授予任何系統或資料存取權限之前進行持續檢驗。它強制執行強大的身份驗證、微隔離和嚴格的最小權限原則，而不是假定內部網路的安全性。這種方法顯著降低了遭受網路攻擊的風險，並限制了未經授權的橫向移動，因為每個請求都會被監控、檢驗和評估潛在風險。零信任架構旨在保護雲端平台、遠端操作和混合 IT 環境，幫助組織加強資料保護，降低資料外洩的可能性，並維護一個更安全、更具彈性和更易於管理的數位生態系統。

根據美國國家標準與技術美國(NIST) SP 800-207 的規定，零信任將防禦的重點從靜態的網路邊界轉移到使用者、資產和資源，要求在授予存取權限之前進行持續的身份驗證和授權。

日益複雜的網路攻擊

零信任架構市場的成長主要受全球企業面臨的日益複雜且數量龐大的網路威脅的驅動。傳統的邊界防禦已無法抵禦諸如憑證竊取、相關人員濫用和持續入侵等現代攻擊。隨著攻擊者利用雲端配置錯誤、遠端設備漏洞和身分管理漏洞，企業正在向零信任架構轉型，以實現持續檢驗和細粒度的存取控制。勒索軟體、網路釣魚宣傳活動和未經授權的橫向移動的興起，進一步促使企業採用不預設自動信任的安全模型。隨著數位生態系統的擴展，零信任為最大限度地降低風險敞口和增強長期網路安全穩健性提供了關鍵基礎。

實施成本高且複雜

零信任架構市場受到高昂實施成本和技術複雜性的限制。實施零信任涉及升級身分基礎設施、重新設計網路、加強端點檢驗以及建構持續監控系統。許多企業在從傳統系統遷移到現代安全解決方案時面臨財務壓力。此外，專業知識、廣泛的策略映射和複雜的整合流程也構成了額外的障礙。中小企業尤其難以應對前期成本和潛在的業務中斷。由於零信任需要全面且分階段的實施，企業可能會面臨漫長且不斷攀升的成本，這使得預算和技術資源有限的組織難以採用這種模式。

對安全遠端和混合辦公模式的需求日益成長

混合辦公和遠距辦公環境的廣泛普及顯著拓展了零信任架構的成長機會。隨著員工透過各種設備、家庭網路和外部地點進行連接，企業需要高階安全防護來檢驗每個使用者和操作。零信任提供即時身分驗證、基於風險的存取決策和端點檢查，從而保障分散式辦公團隊的營運安全。雲端協作平台、個人設備以及與外部合作夥伴協作的日益普及，進一步推動了以身分為中心的安全模型的需求。希望為分散式辦公團隊提供支援的企業正依靠零信任來最大限度地降低威脅並維持存取控制，這為市場供應商創造了強勁的成長前景。

網路威脅日益複雜，已超出安全能力範圍。

網路威脅的演進速度遠超防御手段，對零信任架構市場構成威脅。攻擊者如今正採用複雜的策略，包括人工智慧驅動的惡意軟體、深度造假身分盜竊、進階憑證攻擊和多層入侵技術。這些趨勢給依賴嚴格身份驗證、分析和持續監控的零信任架構帶來了巨大壓力。檢測技術的滯後會導致漏洞並延誤事件回應。諸如API篡改、雲端基礎攻擊和加密通訊漏洞利用等新風險進一步加劇了防護措施的複雜性。隨著網路犯罪分子不斷創新，攻擊技術和防禦工具之間的差距可能會進一步擴大，從而威脅零信任系統的長期穩健性。

新冠疫情的影響：

新冠疫情為零信任架構市場注入了強勁動力，因為企業迅速轉型為遠端和混合辦公模式。由於員工分散在不同的地點和網路中工作，傳統的以邊界為中心的安全防護已無法提供足夠的保護。快速的雲端依賴、虛擬協作工具和數位轉型加劇了安全風險，使得主導身分的安全防護至關重要。零信任架構憑藉持續檢驗、嚴格的存取控制和裝置合規性監控成為重中之重。疫情也導致網路安全事件激增，迫使企業加強防禦。因此，新冠疫情加速了零信任架構的普及，並重塑了企業未來的安全規劃。

預計在預測期內，網路安全領域將佔據最大的市場佔有率。

預計在預測期內，網路安全領域將佔據最大的市場佔有率，因為它作為控制互動、流量交換和存取試驗的基礎層。零信任策略依賴透過網路分段、即時可見性和基於身分的存取規則來強化網路路徑。隨著企業在混合的本地和雲端環境中營運，確保用戶、設備和應用程式之間的通訊成為重中之重。網路安全可確保對內部流量進行詳細監控，從而限制攻擊者的橫向移動和未授權存取。隨著對雲端平台、遠端操作和連網數位系統的依賴性日益增強，企業需要依靠強大的基於網路的保護措施來有效滿足零信任要求。

預計在預測期內，醫療保健產業將實現最高的複合年成長率。

在預測期內，醫療保健產業預計將呈現最高的成長率，這主要得益於快速的數位轉型、電子健康記錄的廣泛應用以及對遠端醫療和互聯健康技術的日益依賴。隨著敏感的患者數據在雲端環境、遠端設備和合作夥伴網路之間傳輸，該行業面臨日益嚴峻的網路威脅。零信任架構提供身分管理、端點檢驗和網路分段等功能，以保護複雜的醫療保健生態系統。虛擬醫療模式的擴展、遠端患者監護以及整合數位健康系統的普及，進一步推動了對嚴格檢驗和存取控制的需求。隨著醫療保健技術的不斷發展，零信任架構對於確保安全性和服務可靠性至關重要。

佔比最大的地區：

北美預計將在整個預測期內保持最大的市場佔有率，這得益於其高度發達的網路安全環境、強大的技術基礎設施以及對保護敏感資料的堅定承諾。領先的零信任提供者以及銀行、醫療保健和公共部門等領域的先鋒企業正在推動零信任技術的普及應用。法規結構、政府主導的舉措以及私人投資都在推動以身分為中心和分段式安全模型的部署。該地區的企業越來越依賴持續檢驗、零信任存取控制和即時監控來保護混合雲端系統和雲端系統。這種主導地位不僅凸顯了該地區在網路安全創新方面的實力，也反映了其對日益成長的網路風險的積極應對。

年複合成長率最高的地區：

預計亞太地區在預測期內將實現最高的複合年成長率，這主要得益於數位化進程的強勁推進、政府主導的網路防禦計劃以及開發中國家雲端服務日益普及。隨著企業基礎設施的現代化，印度、中國、日本和澳洲等國家正在增加網路安全投資。遠距辦公的廣泛應用，以及物聯網和連網設備的激增，促使企業更加依賴基於身分的安全機制。亞太地區的企業正擴大採用零信任安全策略來保護其現代化基礎設施，這使得該地區對安全服務提供者而言具有重要的戰略意義。

免費客製化服務：

購買此報告的客戶可以選擇以下免費自訂選項之一：

公司概況
- 對其他市場公司（最多 3 家公司）進行全面分析
- 對主要企業進行SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
區域細分
- 根據客戶要求，提供主要國家的市場估算和預測以及複合年成長率（註：可行性需確認）。
競爭基準化分析
- 根據主要企業的產品系列、地理覆蓋範圍和策略聯盟基準化分析

介紹
北美洲
- 美國
- 加拿大
- 墨西哥
歐洲
- 德國
- 英國
- 義大利
- 法國
- 西班牙
- 其他歐洲
亞太地區
- 日本
- 中國
- 印度
- 澳洲
- 紐西蘭
- 韓國
- 亞太其他地區
南美洲
- 阿根廷
- 巴西
- 智利
- 其他南美洲
中東和非洲
- 沙烏地阿拉伯
- 阿拉伯聯合大公國
- 卡達
- 南非
- 其他中東和非洲地區

第12章重大進展

協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
收購與併購
新產品上市
業務拓展
其他關鍵策略

第13章：企業概況

Palo Alto Networks
Cisco Systems
Zscaler
Microsoft Corporation
Fortinet
Check Point Software Technologies
Okta
Netskope
CrowdStrike
Cloudflare
IBM Corporation
Google LLC
Akamai Technologies
SentinelOne
StrongDM

簡介目錄圖表

Product Code: SMRC32532

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is accounted for $40.53 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $125.34 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 17.5% during the forecast period. Zero Trust Architecture is a cybersecurity model centered on the idea that no user or device should be trusted by default, requiring continuous verification before allowing access to any system or data. Instead of assuming internal network safety, it enforces strong identity checks, micro-segmentation, and strict least-privilege permissions. This approach ensures every request is monitored, validated, and evaluated for potential risk, significantly minimizing exposure to cyberattacks and restricting unauthorized lateral movement. Designed to protect cloud platforms, remote operations, and mixed IT environments, Zero Trust helps organizations enhance data protection, reduce breach likelihood, and maintain a more secure, resilient, and controlled digital ecosystem.

According to National Institute of Standards and Technology, data shows in SP 800-207 that Zero Trust moves defenses from static, network-based perimeters to focus on users, assets, and resources. It requires continuous authentication and authorization before granting access.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising sophistication of cyberattacks

Growth in the Zero Trust Architecture market is largely fueled by the escalating complexity and volume of cyber threats impacting businesses worldwide. Conventional perimeter defenses fail to counter modern attacks such as credential theft, insider misuse, and persistent intrusions. With attackers exploiting cloud misconfigurations, remote device weaknesses, and identity loopholes, organizations are shifting to Zero Trust for continuous verification and granular access control. Increasing incidents of ransomware, phishing campaigns, and unauthorized lateral movements are further pushing enterprises to adopt a security model without automatic trust. As digital ecosystems expand, Zero Trust provides a critical foundation for minimizing exposure and enhancing long-term cybersecurity robustness.

Restraint:

High implementation costs and complexity

The Zero Trust Architecture market faces constraints due to substantial deployment expenses and technical intricacies. Implementing Zero Trust involves upgrading identity frameworks, redesigning networks, enhancing endpoint verification, and setting up continuous monitoring systems. Many businesses encounter financial pressure when transitioning from outdated systems to modern security solutions. Additional barriers arise from the need for specialized expertise, extensive policy mapping, and complex integration processes. Smaller firms especially struggle with upfront costs and potential workflow interruptions. Since Zero Trust requires a comprehensive and staged rollout, companies may experience extended timelines and rising expenditures, making the model harder to adopt for organizations with limited budgets or technical resources.

Opportunity:

Expanding need for secure remote and hybrid workforce models

The widespread move to hybrid and remote work environments significantly boosts the opportunity for Zero Trust Architecture growth. With employees connecting from diverse devices, home networks, and off-site locations, organizations require advanced safeguards that verify every user and action. Zero Trust delivers real-time authentication, risk-based access decisions, and endpoint checks to secure dispersed workforce operations. Rising use of cloud collaboration platforms, personal devices and external partner integrations further increases demand for identity-centric security models. Companies aiming to strengthen distributed work environments rely on Zero Trust to minimize threats and maintain controlled access, creating strong expansion prospects for market vendors.

Threat:

Rising complexity of cyber threats outpacing security capabilities

The Zero Trust Architecture market is increasingly threatened by cyber threats that advance more rapidly than defensive capabilities. Attackers now use complex strategies such as AI-powered malware, deepfake identity fraud, sophisticated credential attacks, and layered intrusion methods. These developments strain Zero Trust implementations, which depend on precise identity checks, analytics, and continuous oversight. Any lag in detection technology can create vulnerabilities or slow incident response. Emerging risks from API manipulation, cloud-based attacks, and encrypted traffic exploitation further complicate protection efforts. As cybercriminals continue to innovate, the gap between attack methods and defensive tools may grow, undermining the long-term strength of Zero Trust systems.

Covid-19 Impact:

COVID-19 created strong momentum for the Zero Trust Architecture market as companies transitioned rapidly to remote and hybrid operations. With employees working from diverse locations and networks, conventional perimeter-focused security could no longer provide adequate protection. The surge in cloud dependence, virtual collaboration tools, and digital transformation widened security risks, making identity-driven protection essential. Zero Trust became a priority due to its continuous verification, strict access controls, and device compliance monitoring. The pandemic also fueled a rise in cyber incidents, prompting organizations to strengthen their defenses. As a result, COVID-19 accelerated Zero Trust adoption and reshaped enterprise security planning for the future.

The network security segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The network security segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because it acts as the foundational layer for controlling interactions, traffic exchanges, and access attempts. Zero Trust strategies depend on reinforcing network routes through segmentation, real-time visibility, and identity-governed access rules. As enterprises operate in mixed on-premise and cloud ecosystems, securing communication across users, devices, and applications becomes a top priority. Network security ensures detailed oversight of internal traffic, limiting lateral attacker movement and unauthorized access. With growing reliance on cloud platforms, remote operations, and interconnected digital systems, organizations rely on strong network-based safeguards to uphold Zero Trust requirements effectively.

The healthcare segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the healthcare segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate because of its rapid digital transformation, rising use of electronic medical records, and dependence on telehealth and connected healthcare technologies. The industry faces heightened exposure to cyber threats as critical patient data travels across cloud environments, remote endpoints, and partner networks. Zero Trust provides the identity control, endpoint validation, and network segmentation required to secure complex medical ecosystems. Expanding virtual care models, remote patient monitoring, and integrated digital health systems further increase the need for strict verification and controlled access. As healthcare evolves technologically, Zero Trust becomes crucial for ensuring security and service reliability.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share due to its well-developed cybersecurity environment, strong technological infrastructure, and deep commitment to securing sensitive data. Major Zero Trust providers and forward-thinking enterprises across sectors such as banking, healthcare, and public institutions drive adoption. Regulatory frameworks, government initiatives, and private investments all promote deployment of identity-centric and segmented security models. Firms in the region increasingly rely on continuous verification, zero-trust access controls, and real-time monitoring to defend their hybrid and cloud systems. This dominance highlights not only the region's innovation in cybersecurity but also its proactive response to escalating cyber risks.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR due to its strong push toward digitalization, governmental cyber-defense programs, and rising use of cloud services in developing economies. Countries such as India, China, Japan, and Australia are increasing their cybersecurity investments as businesses overhaul their infrastructure. The trend of remote working, combined with a surge in IoT and interconnected devices, is driving greater reliance on identity-based security. As firms across the Asia-Pacific strive to safeguard their modern infrastructures, they are increasingly adopting Zero Trust, making the region strategically important for providers.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Zero Trust Architecture Market include Palo Alto Networks, Cisco Systems, Zscaler, Microsoft Corporation, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Okta, Netskope, CrowdStrike, Cloudflare, IBM Corporation, Google LLC, Akamai Technologies, SentinelOne and StrongDM.

Key Developments:

In October 2025, Microsoft and OpenAI have shared a vision to advance artificial intelligence responsibly and make its benefits broadly accessible. What began as an investment in a research organization has grown into one of the most successful partnerships in our industry. As we enter the next phase of this partnership, we've signed a new definitive agreement that builds on our foundation, strengthens our partnership, and sets the stage for long-term success for both organizations.

In October 2025, Cisco announced an expanded partnership with NVIDIA to combine two of the most widely used networking portfolios: Cisco Silicon One and NVIDIA Spectrum-X Ethernet. This collaboration aimed to provide enterprises with unparalleled flexibility and options for their AI data center investments.

In February 2025, Akamai Technologies has finalized a strategic multi-year agreement with a major technology company, committing to spend over $100 million on cloud computing services. The partnership allows for the utilization of Akamai's comprehensive portfolio to enhance the customer's infrastructure.

Components Covered:

Solutions
Services

Security Capabilities Covered:

Network Security
Data Security
Endpoint Security
Application Security
Cloud Security

Authentication Types Covered:

Single-Factor Authentication
Multi-Factor Authentication

Deployment Modes Covered:

Cloud-Based
On-Premises

Organization Sizes Covered:

Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
Large Enterprises

End Users Covered:

BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance)
IT & ITeS
Government & Defense
Healthcare
Retail & E-commerce
Energy & Utilities
Other End Users

Regions Covered:

North America
- US
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- Italy
- France
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
Asia Pacific
- Japan
- China
- India
- Australia
- New Zealand
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia Pacific
South America
- Argentina
- Brazil
- Chile
- Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- UAE
- Qatar
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

Company Profiling
- Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
- SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
Regional Segmentation
- Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
Competitive Benchmarking
- Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

2.1 Abstract
2.2 Stake Holders
2.3 Research Scope
2.4 Research Methodology
- 2.4.1 Data Mining
- 2.4.2 Data Analysis
- 2.4.3 Data Validation
- 2.4.4 Research Approach
2.5 Research Sources
- 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
- 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
- 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

3.1 Introduction
3.2 Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
3.5 Threats
3.6 End User Analysis
3.7 Emerging Markets
3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
4.3 Threat of substitutes
4.4 Threat of new entrants
4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Component

5.1 Introduction
5.2 Solutions
5.3 Services

6 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Security Capability

6.1 Introduction
6.2 Network Security
6.3 Data Security
6.4 Endpoint Security
6.5 Application Security
6.6 Cloud Security

7 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Authentication Type

7.1 Introduction
7.2 Single-Factor Authentication
7.3 Multi-Factor Authentication

8 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Deployment Mode

8.1 Introduction
8.2 Cloud-Based
8.3 On-Premises

9 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Organization Size

9.1 Introduction
9.2 Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
9.3 Large Enterprises

10 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By End User

10.1 Introduction
10.2 BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance)
10.3 IT & ITeS
10.4 Government & Defense
10.5 Healthcare
10.6 Retail & E-commerce
10.7 Energy & Utilities
10.8 Other End Users

11 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Geography

11.1 Introduction
11.2 North America
- 11.2.1 US
- 11.2.2 Canada
- 11.2.3 Mexico
11.3 Europe
- 11.3.1 Germany
- 11.3.2 UK
- 11.3.3 Italy
- 11.3.4 France
- 11.3.5 Spain
- 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
11.4 Asia Pacific
- 11.4.1 Japan
- 11.4.2 China
- 11.4.3 India
- 11.4.4 Australia
- 11.4.5 New Zealand
- 11.4.6 South Korea
- 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
11.5 South America
- 11.5.1 Argentina
- 11.5.2 Brazil
- 11.5.3 Chile
- 11.5.4 Rest of South America
11.6 Middle East & Africa
- 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
- 11.6.2 UAE
- 11.6.3 Qatar
- 11.6.4 South Africa
- 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
12.3 New Product Launch
12.4 Expansions
12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

13.1 Palo Alto Networks
13.2 Cisco Systems
13.3 Zscaler
13.4 Microsoft Corporation
13.5 Fortinet
13.6 Check Point Software Technologies
13.7 Okta
13.8 Netskope
13.9 CrowdStrike
13.10 Cloudflare
13.11 IBM Corporation
13.12 Google LLC
13.13 Akamai Technologies
13.14 SentinelOne
13.15 StrongDM

簡介目錄圖表

List of Tables

Table 1 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 2 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 3 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Solutions (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 4 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 5 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Security Capability (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 6 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Network Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 7 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Data Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 8 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Endpoint Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 9 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Application Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 10 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Cloud Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 11 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Authentication Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 12 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Single-Factor Authentication (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 13 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Multi-Factor Authentication (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 14 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Deployment Mode (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 15 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Cloud-Based (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 16 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By On-Premises (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 17 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Organization Size (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 18 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 19 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Large Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 20 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 21 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance) (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 22 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By IT & ITeS (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 23 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Government & Defense (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 24 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Healthcare (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 25 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Retail & E-commerce (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 26 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Energy & Utilities (2024-2032) ($MN)
Table 27 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)