零信任架構市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測（按組件、按部署、按垂直產業、按地區和競爭細分，2020-2030 年）

2024 年全球零信任架構市場價值為 185.5 億美元，預計到 2030 年將達到 469.4 億美元，複合年成長率為 16.73%。

與傳統的基於邊界的安全模型不同，零信任架構假設任何使用者或裝置都不可信任，無論其位於組織網路內部還是外部。每個存取請求都會經過持續的身份驗證、授權和加密，從而顯著減少攻擊面。隨著組織採用雲端服務、遠端辦公和自帶設備環境，零信任架構提供了一個可擴展且可自適應的框架，以保護複雜的混合基礎架構。

日益增多的網路威脅和資料外洩是市場成長的主要推動因素。隨著針對身分、終端和資料的攻擊日益增多，企業正在轉向主動安全模式。 GDPR、HIPAA 和 CCPA 等監管法規也促使企業採用更嚴格的安全框架，例如零信任。金融服務、醫療保健、零售和製造等垂直行業的公司正在迅速整合零信任原則，以保護使用者身分、網路、應用程式和資料的安全。此外，數位轉型計畫和分散式勞動力已經使傳統的安全邊界變得過時，從而加速了對零信任採用的需求。

全球零信任架構市場預計將在創新和網路安全投資不斷增加的推動下實現強勁成長。供應商正在開發整合式零信任平台，該平台融合了多因素身份驗證、微分段、身份和存取管理、端點安全和即時分析等技術。基於雲端的零信任解決方案因其可擴展性和易於部署的特點而日益受到青睞。隨著企業尋求加強網路安全態勢並減少內部威脅，對零信任架構的需求預計將呈指數級成長。人工智慧和機器學習的持續進步將進一步支援自適應存取控制和即時威脅偵測，鞏固零信任作為不斷發展的數位環境中基礎安全策略的地位。

關鍵市場促進因素

針對身分和資料的網路安全威脅不斷升級

主要市場挑戰

與傳統基礎設施整合的複雜性

主要市場趨勢

以身分為中心的安全框架的採用率不斷上升

目錄

第 1 章：解決方案概述

• 市場定義
• 市場範圍
  • 覆蓋市場
  • 考慮學習的年限
  • 主要市場區隔

第2章：研究方法

第3章：執行摘要

第4章：顧客之聲

第5章：全球零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 按組件（解決方案、服務）
  • 按部署（本地、雲端）
  • 按垂直產業（BFSI、IT 和 ITES、能源和公用事業、政府和國防、醫療保健、其他）
  • 按地區（北美、歐洲、南美、中東和非洲、亞太地區）
• 按公司分類（2024）
• 市場地圖

第6章：北美零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 北美：國家分析
  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

第7章：歐洲零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 歐洲：國家分析
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙

第8章：亞太地區零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 亞太地區：國家分析
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韓國
  • 澳洲

第9章：中東與非洲零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 中東和非洲：國家分析
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
  • 南非

第10章：南美洲零信任架構市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 南美洲：國家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥倫比亞
  • 阿根廷

第 11 章：市場動態

• 驅動程式
• 挑戰

第 12 章：市場趨勢與發展

• 合併與收購（如有）
• 產品發布（如有）
• 最新動態

第13章：公司簡介

• Microsoft Corporation
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Okta, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Broadcom Inc.
• Google LLC

第 14 章：策略建議

第15章調查會社について,免責事項

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market was valued at USD 18.55 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 46.94 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 16.73% through 2030.

Unlike traditional perimeter-based security models, Zero Trust Architecture assumes no user or device is inherently trustworthy, whether inside or outside the organization's network. Every access request is continuously authenticated, authorized, and encrypted, significantly reducing the attack surface. As organizations adopt cloud services, remote work, and bring-your-own-device environments, Zero Trust offers a scalable and adaptive framework to secure complex, hybrid infrastructures.

Rising cyber threats and data breaches are major contributors to the market's growth. With increased attacks targeting identity, endpoints, and data, organizations are shifting toward proactive security models. Regulatory mandates such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA also push enterprises to adopt tighter security frameworks like Zero Trust. Companies across verticals including financial services, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing are rapidly integrating Zero Trust principles to secure user identities, networks, applications, and data. Furthermore, digital transformation initiatives and distributed workforces have made traditional security perimeters obsolete, accelerating the need for Zero Trust adoption.

The Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is expected to see strong growth driven by innovation and increasing investment in cybersecurity. Vendors are developing integrated Zero Trust platforms that combine multi-factor authentication, micro-segmentation, identity and access management, endpoint security, and real-time analytics. Cloud-based Zero Trust solutions are gaining traction due to their scalability and ease of deployment. As enterprises look to strengthen their cybersecurity posture and reduce insider threats, the demand for Zero Trust Architecture is anticipated to grow exponentially. Continuous advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning will further support adaptive access control and real-time threat detection, solidifying Zero Trust as a foundational security strategy in the evolving digital landscape.

Key Market Drivers

Escalating Cybersecurity Threats Targeting Identities and Data

The modern threat landscape is characterized by increasingly targeted attacks-such as credential theft, lateral movement, ransomware, and supply chain exploits-that do not respect traditional network perimeters. Organizations are recognizing that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient when adversaries can bypass firewalls or exploit trusted insiders. Zero Trust architecture addresses this by enforcing continuous verification of every access request, regardless of source or destination, ensuring that identities and data remain protected even in compromised environments.

With identity-based attacks accounting for a growing share of breaches, enterprises across financial, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors are adopting Zero Trust as a core shield. Continuous authentication, micro-segmentation, and least-privilege access policies limit the blast radius of incidents and enable controlled movement within the network. As cyber risk evolves, the rigor and adaptability of Zero Trust principles are compelling organizations to shift away from legacy access models. In 2024, around 76 percent of confirmed data breaches involved misuse or theft of credentials. This alarming figure highlights the failure of perimeter-based security models and underscores the urgency for organizations to implement Zero Trust frameworks that enforce continuous identity verification and access validation at every point across their digital infrastructure.

Key Market Challenges

Complexity in Integration with Legacy Infrastructure

One of the most pressing challenges hindering the widespread adoption of Zero Trust Architecture in the global market is the complexity associated with integrating it into existing legacy infrastructure. Most organizations, especially large enterprises and public institutions, operate on decades-old networks and systems that were never designed with Zero Trust principles in mind. Retrofitting these systems requires meticulous reconfiguration of access protocols, identity management layers, network segmentation models, and endpoint visibility frameworks. This integration is not only time-consuming but also requires substantial capital investment, which becomes even more daunting for organizations dealing with outdated, unsupported, or heavily customized platforms. As a result, companies often struggle to migrate to a Zero Trust model without causing service disruptions or exposing themselves to interim vulnerabilities during the transition period.

The transition to Zero Trust Architecture demands a fundamental shift in how access and trust are managed across digital ecosystems. Unlike traditional perimeter-based models, Zero Trust assumes no implicit trust and requires continuous authentication, authorization, and validation at every access point. However, legacy systems were built on the principle of network-based trust, creating friction in aligning them with Zero Trust methodologies. Many of these systems lack support for modern authentication standards, making it difficult to establish identity-aware access control without major overhauls or custom integrations. Organizations also face skill gaps among their IT teams, who may not possess the specialized knowledge necessary to architect secure, scalable Zero Trust deployments. These factors collectively impede the pace of adoption, increase total cost of ownership, and deter organizations from fully embracing Zero Trust Architecture.

Key Market Trends

Rising Adoption of Identity-Centric Security Frameworks

A significant trend driving the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is the increasing emphasis on identity-centric security models. As organizations shift from perimeter-based defenses toward micro-segmented, identity-driven access control mechanisms, identity verification has become the foundational layer of Zero Trust implementation. Enterprises are integrating advanced identity and access management technologies to verify users, devices, and workloads before granting access to critical resources. These systems allow organizations to enforce contextual, risk-aware policies based on real-time identity attributes, location, behavior, and device posture.

This identity-centric approach is particularly valuable in hybrid and remote work environments, where the traditional corporate network boundary has dissolved. Enterprises can no longer rely on physical network segmentation alone. Instead, by prioritizing identity as the new perimeter, organizations can minimize lateral movement of threats and detect anomalous access patterns more effectively. Identity-centric frameworks also support regulatory compliance by ensuring traceability and policy enforcement across multi-cloud and distributed infrastructures. The global surge in identity breaches and credential-based attacks further underscores the importance of adopting identity-first Zero Trust strategies across public and private sectors.

Key Market Players

• Microsoft Corporation
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Okta, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Broadcom Inc.
• Google LLC

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Component:

• Solutions
• Services

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Deployment:

• On-Premises
• Cloud

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Vertical:

• BFSI
• IT & ITES
• Energy & Utilities
• Government & Defense
• Healthcare
• Others

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • South Africa
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Colombia
  • Argentina

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Solution Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Component (Solutions, Services)
  • 5.2.2. By Deployment (On-Premises, Cloud)
  • 5.2.3. By Vertical (BFSI, IT & ITES, Energy & Utilities, Government & Defense, Healthcare, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
• 5.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Component
  • 6.2.2. By Deployment
  • 6.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.3.2. Canada Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

7. Europe Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Component
  • 7.2.2. By Deployment
  • 7.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.2. France Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.4. Italy Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.5. Spain Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

8. Asia Pacific Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Component
  • 8.2.2. By Deployment
  • 8.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.2. India Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.3. Japan Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.5. Australia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

9. Middle East & Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Component
  • 9.2.2. By Deployment
  • 9.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.3.2. UAE Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

10. South America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Component
  • 10.2.2. By Deployment
  • 10.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends and Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Company Profiles

• 13.1. Microsoft Corporation
  • 13.1.1. Business Overview
  • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.2. Cisco Systems, Inc.
• 13.3. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• 13.4. Zscaler, Inc.
• 13.5. Okta, Inc.
• 13.6. IBM Corporation
• 13.7. Broadcom Inc.
• 13.8. Google LLC

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer