![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1876689
生物多樣性信貸市場預測至2032年:按信貸類型、計劃類型、買方類型、銷售管道、最終用戶和地區分類的全球分析Biodiversity Credit Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Credit Type, Project Type, Buyer Type, Sales Channel, End User, and By Geography |
||||||
根據 Stratistics MRC 的一項研究,全球生物多樣性信用市場在 2025 年的估值為 7.4 億美元,預計到 2032 年將達到 124.1 億美元。
預計在預測期內,生物多樣性信用將以49.4%的複合年成長率成長。生物多樣性信用機制使私人投資能夠透過創建與檢驗的生物多樣性改善、棲息地恢復、物種恢復或入侵物種控制掛鉤的可交易信用來支持保育成果。企業購買信用額度是為了減輕其營運對生物多樣性的影響,並履行其對自然環境做出積極貢獻的承諾。健全的監測機制、標準化的指標和長期的管治對於確保信用的公信力和持久性至關重要。
日益成長的監管要求和國際協議
生物多樣性信用市場的主要驅動力是監管要求和國際協議的激增,例如《昆明-蒙特利爾生物多樣性框架》。這些框架為各國和企業設定了明確且可操作的目標,並以法律形式強制要求對環境影響進行會計和抵銷。這催生了合規主導的生物多樣性信用需求,並將自願保護措施轉變為監管要求。因此,這些政策透過建立對經認證的生物多樣性效益不可取代的需求基礎,直接推動了市場成長。
市場基礎設施、透明度和流動性有限
生物多樣性信用市場的主要驅動力是監管要求和國際協議的激增,例如《昆明-蒙特利爾生物多樣性框架》。這些框架為各國和企業設定了明確且可操作的目標,並以法律形式強制要求對環境影響進行會計和抵銷。這催生了合規主導的生物多樣性信用需求,將自願保護措施轉變為監管要求。因此,這些政策透過建立對經認證的生物多樣性收益不可取代的需求基礎,直接推動了市場成長。
與碳市場和生態系統服務付費(PES)的整合
將生物多樣性信用與現有環境市場(特別是碳排放交易和生態系統服務付費機制)結合,蘊藏著巨大的機會。這種方法允許將信用額度捆綁在一起,使購買者能夠同時實現氣候和生物多樣性目標,從而提升計劃價值並吸引更廣泛的投資者群體。此外,這種整合有助於採取更全面的自然資本管理方法,產生協同效應,並創建新的混合融資模式,從而顯著加速市場擴張。
感測器技術的進步
分析指出,遙感探測技術和人工智慧驅動的監測技術的快速發展帶來了矛盾的威脅。這些技術雖然有利於檢驗,但也使得企業能夠以更低的成本和更高的可靠性進行內部生物多樣性影響直接監測。這些進步可能會降低企業對購買第三方信用額度進行合規報告的依賴。因此,如果企業選擇透過技術賦能的直接管理而非市場參與來履行其義務,那麼對正式生物多樣性信用額度的需求可能會受到削弱。
新冠疫情初期擾亂了生物多樣性信用市場,導致計劃延期、實地研究取消,政府和企業資金轉移到緊急刺激計劃。然而,這場危機也成為了一個深刻的催化劑,凸顯了生態系統劣化與全球健康風險之間的關鍵連結。這種意識的增強促使政策制定者和企業在後疫情時代更加重視投資環境友善計劃,從而催生了對生物多樣性信用的更強勁、更持久的需求,將其作為改善和復甦工作的一部分。
預計在預測期內,棲息地恢復積分細分市場將佔據最大的市場佔有率。
由於棲息地恢復信用額度與土地劣化零成長等緊迫的全球優先事項直接相關,且其成果切實可衡量,預計在預測期內,棲息地恢復信用額度將佔據最大的市場佔有率。這些計劃,包括植樹造林和濕地恢復,通常擁有成熟的信用額度量化調查方法,從而降低了投資者的不確定性。此外,這些項目往往還能帶來土壤保護和水質淨化等額外效益,提升其價值,使其成為尋求檢驗影響的公共資金和企業永續發展投資的首選。
預計在預測期內,珊瑚礁和海洋生物多樣性計劃板塊的複合年成長率將最高。
珊瑚礁和海洋生物多樣性計劃領域預計將在預測期內呈現最高的成長率,這反映出人們對海洋環境日益成長的關注以及沿海生態系統巨大的經濟價值。針對瀕危海洋棲息地的藍色債券和以海洋為重點的ESG投資政策正在推動這一成長。此外,海洋監測技術的進步提高了這些計劃的可信度,並使以往難以進入的環境中得以進行新的投資,從而使這一細分領域能夠從目前的小規模規模迅速擴張。
預計在整個預測期內,歐洲將佔據最大的市場佔有率。歐盟雄心勃勃的監管環境,包括自然修復法和嚴格的企業實質審查要求,鞏固了其主導地位。這些政策催生了其他地區無法比擬的合規主導需求。此外,企業高度的環保意識和先行舉措,尤其是在法國和英國等國家,為市場發展和交易量提供了成熟的生態系統,進一步強化了歐洲的優勢。
預計亞太地區將在預測期內實現最快成長,這主要得益於該地區豐富的生物多樣性正面臨嚴重威脅,以及各國紛紛推出旨在保護自然的政策。此外,該地區是國際生物多樣性融資的主要受益地區,企業自願投資需求也不斷成長。高需求、不斷變化的監管環境以及不斷增加的投資,共同為生物多樣性信貸計劃的快速發展創造了有利條件。
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biodiversity Credit Market is accounted for $0.74 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $12.41 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 49.4% during the forecast period. The biodiversity credit enables private investment to support conservation outcomes by creating tradable credits tied to verifiable biodiversity gains, habitat restoration, species recovery, or invasive species control. Corporates purchase credits to mitigate biodiversity impacts from operations, aligning with nature-positive commitments. Robust monitoring, standardized metrics, and long-term governance are essential for credibility and permanence.
Increasing regulatory mandates and international agreements
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Limited market infrastructure, transparency, and liquidity
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Integration with carbon markets and payment for ecosystem services
A substantial opportunity lies in the integration of biodiversity credits with established environmental markets, particularly carbon trading and Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. This approach allows for the bundling of credits, enabling buyers to address climate and biodiversity goals simultaneously, thereby enhancing project value and attracting a broader investor base. Moreover, this integration fosters a more holistic approach to natural capital management, creating synergistic benefits and unlocking new, blended finance models that can significantly accelerate market expansion.
Advancements in sensor technology
The analysis identifies a paradoxical threat from rapid advancements in remote sensor technology and AI-driven monitoring. While beneficial for verification, these technologies are making it cheaper and more reliable for corporations to implement direct, in-house biodiversity impact monitoring. These improvements could reduce their dependence on purchasing third-party credits for compliance reporting. As a result, the demand for formal biodiversity credit units may be undermined if companies choose to manage obligations through direct, technologically enabled stewardship rather than market participation.
The COVID-19 pandemic initially disrupted the biodiversity credit market by causing project delays, halting field research, and diverting government and corporate funding towards immediate economic relief. However, the crisis also served as a profound catalyst by highlighting the critical link between ecosystem degradation and global health risks. This increased awareness has led to more attention from policymakers and businesses towards investing in nature-friendly projects after the pandemic, which has created a stronger and more lasting need for biodiversity credits as part of efforts to improve and rebuild.
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, driven by its direct alignment with pressing global priorities like land degradation neutrality and its tangible, measurable outcomes. These projects, encompassing reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, often have well-established methodologies for credit quantification, which reduces investor uncertainty. Furthermore, they frequently generate co-benefits such as soil conservation and water purification, enhancing their value and making them a preferred choice for both public funding and corporate sustainability investments seeking verifiable impact.
The coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, reflecting a surge in concern for ocean health and the immense economic value of coastal ecosystems. Blue bonds and ocean-focused ESG mandates, which target critically endangered marine habitats, fuel this growth. Additionally, technological advancements in marine monitoring are improving the credibility of these projects, unlocking new investment into a previously challenging environment, and positioning this niche for rapid expansion from its current smaller base.
During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. The EU's ambitious regulatory landscape, which includes the Nature Restoration Law and stringent corporate due diligence requirements, firmly anchors this leadership. These policies are creating a compliance-driven demand unparalleled in other regions. Moreover, high levels of corporate environmental awareness and early mover initiatives, particularly in countries like France and the UK, provide a mature ecosystem for market development and transaction volume, solidifying Europe's dominant position.
During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to grow the fastest, driven by its rich biodiversity that is at great risk, along with a surge in national policies aimed at protecting nature. Furthermore, the region is a major recipient of international biodiversity finance and is seeing growing voluntary corporate demand. This combination of high need, evolving regulation, and increasing investment creates a potent environment for the rapid scaling of biodiversity credit projects.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Credit Market include Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo Foundation, GreenCollar, Wildlife Works, Natural Capital Partners, BioCarbon Standard, Regen Network, Cercarbono, Ecosphere+, Forest Trends, Ecosystem Marketplace, Biodiversity Credit Alliance, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society, and The Biodiversity Consultancy.
In July 2025, Plan Vivo opened its PV Nature Biodiversity Standard to multiple third-party data analytic providers so projects can choose approved partners for biodiversity quantification. It strengthens the PV Nature biodiversity credit pipeline by standardising measurement of biodiversity outcomes while scaling access for projects seeking Plan Vivo biodiversity credits.
In June 2025, the BioCarbon Standard released version 2.0 of its Sustainable Development Safeguards tool, tightening requirements around community rights, land use and biodiversity safeguards for registered mitigation projects. It reinforces that BioCarbon-certified activities must demonstrate robust biodiversity and social protections, supporting the integrity of any nature- or biodiversity-linked credits issued under the standard.
In February 2025, Gold Standard released its "Funding Nature: An evident business investment" update, announcing work on a corporate nature framework that will sit alongside its emerging biodiversity impact framework and market assessment for biodiversity impact units. It is designed to guide companies in using high-integrity biodiversity credit and nature-impact mechanisms as part of their net-zero and nature-positive strategies.
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.