封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1871868

全球人工智慧管治市場:未來預測(至2032年)-按產品類型、組件、部署方式、功能、組織規模、最終用戶和地區進行分析

AI Governance Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type (MLOps Platforms, LLMOps Platforms, Bias & Fairness Tools and Data Privacy Platforms), Component, Deployment Mode, Functionality, Organization Size, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的一項研究,預計到 2025 年,全球人工智慧管治市場價值將達到 3.043 億美元,到 2032 年將達到 23.2393 億美元,在預測期內的複合年成長率為 33.7%。

人工智慧管治是指確保人工智慧以負責任的方式建構和應用的規則、倫理標準和管理架構。其目標是促進透明度、公平性、課責和資料安全處理,同時最大限度地減少歧視、安全威脅和意外後果等問題。企業、政策制定者和監管機構正在建立框架,以檢驗人工智慧模型、追蹤效能並確保合規性。有效的管治能夠建立使用者信任、保護公共利益並促進人工智慧的安全應用。隨著人工智慧日益融入醫療保健、銀行、交通出行、公共管理等領域,強而有力的監督至關重要。人工監督、審核系統和風險預防措施可確保人工智慧解決方案保持合乎倫理、安全且受到良好監管。

IAPP 發布的《2025 年人工智慧管治專業報告》數據顯示,72% 的受訪組織已經制定了內部人工智慧管治計劃或正在積極制定此類計劃,這標誌著從臨時監督轉向了系統課責。

日益成長的監管壓力和合規要求

不斷提高的法律預期和不斷完善的法規結構是推動人工智慧管治市場發展的關鍵因素。各國正在製定嚴格的指導方針,以確保人工智慧應用中的公平性、透明度、課責的決策以及數據的合理使用。企業面臨實施審核和追蹤系統的壓力,以避免因未遵守合規法規而遭受處罰和法律風險。這些日益成長的義務促使企業​​需要能夠進行偏差檢測、模型檢驗和可解釋性的管治平台。銀行、醫療保健和政府機構等行業正在迅速採用管治工具來保護使用者並維護合乎道德的營運。在監管日益嚴格的背景下,持續合規性對於可信賴的人工智慧部署至關重要。

缺乏技術熟練的專業人員和技術專長

人工智慧管治面臨的一大限制因素是缺乏精通人工智慧倫理、模型審核、合規標準和負責任的資料使用的專家。許多組織缺乏能夠檢驗演算法、識別不公平結果並確保透明度的內部團隊。聘請專家成本高昂,而提升現有員工的技能也需要耗費大量時間和資源。隨著人工智慧應用的普及,對專家的需求成長速度超過了供給,導致企業在管治方面準備不足。這種人才短缺阻礙了企業建構完善的管治體系,並延緩了其產品上市。缺乏專業知識人才的企業難以維護一個值得信賴、合規且公正的人工智慧環境。

擴大企業中負責任的人工智慧的應用

全球企業負責任的人工智慧策略的興起,為人工智慧管治市場帶來了巨大的機會。隨著演算法對金融、醫療診斷、零售營運和政府服務等領域的影響日益顯著,企業越來越追求清晰、公正且保護隱私的人工智慧結果。這推動了對審核模型、追蹤公平性、安全管理數據並解釋自動化決策的工具的需求。正在進行數位轉型的企業依靠可信賴的人工智慧來提高效率並贏得市場信任。對倫理、品牌形象和監管合規性的擔憂也促使企業採用管治框架。隨著人工智慧融入更多領域,對可信賴的管治平台的需求也在穩步成長。

網路安全風險與資料外洩

安全漏洞是人工智慧管治普及應用的主要威脅。平台儲存關鍵資料集、審核追蹤、演算法洞察和監管憑證,使其成為網路犯罪分子的理想目標。安全漏洞可能導致客戶資料外洩、模型受損或敏感企業資料暴露。此類事件會引發不信任,並阻礙企業採用管治工具。駭客還可能篡改記錄或操縱偏見報告,從而加劇監管和法律方面的挑戰。為防範這些風險,服務提供者必須實施強大的加密、身分驗證控制和監控系統,這會增加營運成本。持續的網路威脅會削弱信任,並可能隨著企業尋求更安全的內部替代方案而減緩市場成長。

新冠疫情的影響:

新冠疫情導致人工智慧(AI)的應用激增,尤其是在醫療診斷、遠距銀行、線上零售、物流和數位政務服務等關鍵領域。隨著人工智慧管理個人資料、做出即時決策並實現自動化分析,各組織機構認知到合乎倫理且安全實施人工智慧的重要性。這推動了對能夠提供可解釋性、監督、隱私保護和合規性的管治平台的需求。世界各國政府都在積極推動在疫情應對、接觸者追蹤和醫療物資分發等方面負責任地使用人工智慧。儘管短期預算壓力減緩了中小企業採用人工智慧的速度,但人們對透明度和課責的意識提升促進了市場的長期成長。最終,疫情鞏固了全球對結構化人工智慧管治的需求。

在預測期內,MLOps平台細分市場將佔據最大的市場佔有率。

預計在預測期內,MLOps平台細分市場將佔據最大的市場佔有率,因為它能夠管理機器學習模型的整個生命週期,從開發到部署和持續監控。企業利用這些平台進行準確性監控、版本控制、異常檢測和負責任的資料處理。隨著人工智慧工作負載的擴展,MLOps解決方案提供持續監控,以防止偏差、效能問題和安全風險。銀行、醫療保健、製造業和公共服務等行業依靠這些平台來實現管治活動的自動化,同時保持透明度和課責。 MLOps能夠整合合規工具、可解釋性功能和營運控制,使其成為應用最廣泛的管治方法。

預計在預測期內,雲端業務板塊的複合年成長率將最高。

由於雲端平台具有高可擴展性、易於整合和營運成本低等優勢,預計在預測期內,雲端領域將保持最高的成長率。透過雲端平台,企業無需建立複雜的內部系統即可管理人工智慧模型、監控公平性、實現審核自動化並保護資料安全。數位化服務、遠距辦公和混合基礎設施的快速普及正在推動對雲端管治工具的需求。這些解決方案提供持續更新、集中監控以及在全球團隊中的快速部署。由於雲端環境支援靈活性、即時分析和經濟高效的擴充性,越來越多的組織選擇雲端基礎的管治,以確保其大規模人工智慧營運的課責、透明度和合規性。

佔比最大的地區:

由於北美擁有強大的技術生態系統、廣泛的人工智慧應用以及完善的合規體系,預計在整個預測期內,北美將保持最大的市場佔有率。在美國和加拿大,從政府、國防到銀行和醫療保健等關鍵產業的組織都在積極利用管治框架,以確保人工智慧的負責任使用。日益成長的監管壓力以及公共對透明度和公平性的更高期望,正促使企業投資於審核追蹤、模型可解釋性和風險管理平台。這種高採用率,加上先進的基礎設施和早期監管準備,使北美在全球人工智慧管治應用方面佔據最大佔有率。

預計年複合成長率最高的地區:

預計亞太地區在預測期內將實現最高的複合年成長率,這主要得益於印度、中國、日本和韓國等國家人工智慧的快速普及。隨著醫療保健、製造業、銀行業和公共服務等行業的企業大規模採用人工智慧,對能夠解決公平性、資料隱私、透明度和模型風險等問題的監管工具的需求日益成長。這些國家的政府政策和法規正在推動各組織採用管治平台。鑑於人工智慧計劃的快速發展、日益成長的倫理問題以及監管趨勢,供應商將亞太地區視為人工智慧管治解決方案成長最快的地區。

免費客製化服務

訂閱本報告的用戶可從以下免費自訂選項中選擇一項:

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他公司進行全面分析
    • 對主要企業進行SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 區域分類
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行市場估算、預測和複合年成長率分析(註:基於可行性檢查)
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 基於產品系列、地域覆蓋和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 引言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 分析範圍
  • 分析方法
  • 分析材料

第3章 市場趨勢分析

  • 介紹
  • 促進要素
  • 抑制因素
  • 市場機遇
  • 威脅
  • 產品分析
  • 終端用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • 新冠疫情的感染疾病

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方議價能力
  • 替代產品的威脅
  • 新參與企業的威脅
  • 公司間的競爭

第5章 全球人工智慧管治市場(依產品類型分類)

  • 介紹
  • MLOps平台
  • LLMOps平台
  • 偏見與公平工具
  • 資料隱私平台

6. 全球人工智慧管治市場(按組件分類)

  • 介紹
  • 解決方案
  • 服務

7. 全球人工智慧管治市場以部署方式分類

  • 介紹
  • 本地部署

8. 全球人工智慧管治市場按功能分類

  • 介紹
  • 模型生命週期管治
  • 風險與合規管理
  • 監測和審核
  • 可解釋性和透明度
  • 合乎倫理且負責任的人工智慧

第9章 全球人工智慧管治市場(依組織規模分類)

  • 介紹
  • 主要企業
  • 小型企業

第10章:全球人工智慧管治市場(以最終用戶分類)

  • 介紹
  • 銀行、金融服務和保險(BFSI)
  • 政府和國防部
  • 醫學與生命科​​學
  • 零售與電子商務
  • 製造業
  • 通訊/IT
  • 能源與公用事業

第11章 全球人工智慧管治市場(按地區分類)

  • 介紹
  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 亞太其他地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美洲國家
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第12章:主要趨勢

  • 合約、商業夥伴關係和合資企業
  • 企業合併(M&A)
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務拓展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第13章:公司簡介

  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Google
  • Salesforce
  • SAP SE
  • Amazon Web Services(AWS)
  • SAS Institute
  • FICO
  • Accenture
  • H2O.AI
  • DataRobot
  • Domino Data Lab
  • SparkCognition
  • OneTrust
  • Collibra
Product Code: SMRC32238

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global AI Governance Market is accounted for $304.30 million in 2025 and is expected to reach $2323.93 million by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 33.7% during the forecast period. AI governance involves rules, ethical standards, and management structures designed to ensure artificial intelligence is built and applied responsibly. Its goal is to promote transparency, fairness, accountability, and secure handling of data while minimizing concerns such as discrimination, security threats, or unintended consequences. Businesses, policymakers, and regulators are creating frameworks to validate AI models, track performance, and maintain compliance. Effective governance builds trust among users, safeguards public interests, and encourages safe AI adoption. With AI increasingly embedded in healthcare, banking, mobility, and public administration, solid supervision is vital. Human oversight, auditing systems, and risk-prevention measures ensure AI solutions remain ethical, secure, and well-regulated.

According to data from the IAPP AI Governance Profession Report 2025, 72% of surveyed organizations have either implemented or are actively developing internal AI governance programs, signaling a shift from ad hoc oversight to structured accountability.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising regulatory pressure and compliance requirements

Growing legal expectations and regulatory frameworks are a key force behind the AI governance market. Countries are designing strict guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, accountable decision-making and proper data usage in AI applications. Enterprises face penalties and legal risks when they fail to meet compliance rules, motivating them to adopt auditing and tracking systems. This rise in obligations boosts the need for governance platforms that detect bias, validate models, and ensure explainability. Industries like banking, healthcare, and government organizations are quickly integrating governance tools to protect users and maintain ethical operations. As regulations tighten, consistent compliance becomes essential for trustworthy AI deployment.

Restraint:

Shortage of skilled professionals and technical expertise

A critical restraint in AI governance is the limited availability of professionals qualified in ethical AI, model auditing, compliance standards, and responsible data use. Many organizations lack internal teams capable of reviewing algorithms, identifying unfair outcomes, or ensuring transparency. Hiring experts is expensive, and upskilling current staff requires significant time and resources. As AI adoption increases, the demand for specialists grows faster than supply, leaving companies unprepared to handle governance tasks. This talent gap discourages businesses from establishing strong governance programs and slows overall market development. Without knowledgeable personnel, enterprises face difficulties maintaining trustworthy, regulated, and bias-free AI environments.

Opportunity:

Growing adoption of responsible ai in enterprises

The rise of responsible AI strategies among global businesses presents a large opportunity for the AI governance market. Companies increasingly want clear, bias-free, and privacy-protected AI results, especially as algorithms influence finance, healthcare diagnostics, retail operations, and government services. This drives demand for tools that audit models, track fairness, manage data securely, and explain automated decisions. Organizations undergoing digital transformation depend on trustworthy AI to gain efficiency and market confidence. Concerns around ethics, brand image, and regulatory compliance also push enterprises to use governance frameworks. As AI becomes embedded in more sectors, the requirement for reliable governance platforms grows steadily.

Threat:

Cyber security risks and data breaches

Security vulnerabilities represent a major threat to AI governance adoption. Platforms store important datasets, audit trails, algorithm insights, and regulatory credentials, making them valuable targets for cybercriminals. Breaches can leak customer data, compromise models, or expose sensitive corporate information. These events create distrust and discourage enterprises from integrating governance tools. Hackers could also alter records or tamper with bias reports, increasing regulatory and legal challenges. To prevent such risks, providers must install strong encryption, authentication controls, and monitoring systems, raising operational expenses. Continuous cyber threats weaken dependability and can slow market growth as companies seek safer internal alternatives.

Covid-19 Impact:

COVID-19 created a surge in AI usage, especially in critical sectors like healthcare diagnostics, remote banking, online retail, logistics, and digital government services. With AI managing personal data, real-time decisions, and automated analytics, organizations recognized the importance of ethical and secure deployment. This drove higher demand for governance platforms offering explainability, monitoring, privacy protection, and compliance. Governments encouraged responsible AI during pandemic response, contact tracing, and medical distribution. While temporary budget pressures slowed adoption in smaller companies, long-term market growth improved due to rising awareness of transparency and accountability. The pandemic ultimately strengthened the need for structured AI governance worldwide.

The MLOps platforms segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The MLOps platforms segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because they manage the full lifecycle of machine learning models, from development to deployment and ongoing supervision. Enterprises rely on these platforms to monitor accuracy, handle versioning, detect anomalies, and ensure responsible data handling. As AI workloads expand, MLOps solutions provide continuous oversight, preventing bias, performance issues, and security risks. Industries like banking, healthcare, manufacturing, and public services depend on such platforms to automate governance tasks while maintaining transparency and accountability. Their ability to combine compliance tools, explainability functions, and operational control makes MLOps the most widely adopted governance segment.

The cloud segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the cloud segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate because it offers high scalability, easy integration, and reduced operational expenses. Companies can use cloud platforms to manage AI models, monitor fairness, automate audits, and secure data without building complex internal systems. Rapid adoption of digital services, remote work, and hybrid infrastructures strengthens demand for cloud governance tools. These solutions provide continuous updates, centralized monitoring, and fast deployment across global teams. Since cloud environments support flexibility, real-time analytics, and affordable expansion, organizations increasingly choose cloud-based governance to ensure accountable, transparent, and compliant AI operations at scale.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share, owing to its robust tech ecosystem, extensive AI deployment, and strong compliance stance. In the U.S. and Canada, organizations across major industries-from government and defense to banking and healthcare-are actively using governance frameworks to ensure responsible AI use. With regulatory pressures increasing and public expectations rising around transparency and fairness, companies are investing in platforms for audit-trails, model explain ability, and risk control. This high level of adoption combined with advanced infrastructure and early regulatory movers gives North America the largest share in worldwide AI governance uptake.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, owing to rapid AI uptake in nations like India, China, Japan and South Korea. As enterprises in healthcare, manufacturing, banking and public services deploy AI at scale, they face increased demand for oversight tools that address fairness, data privacy, transparency and model risk. Government policies and regulations in these countries are pushing organizations to adopt governance platforms. Because of the pace of AI projects, rising ethical concerns and regulatory developments, vendors find Asia Pacific to be the region with the steepest growth trajectory for AI governance solutions.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in AI Governance Market include IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Google, Salesforce, SAP SE, Amazon Web Services (AWS), SAS Institute, FICO, Accenture, H2O.AI, DataRobot, Domino Data Lab, SparkCognition, OneTrust and Collibra.

Key Developments:

In November 2025, Amazon Web Services and OpenAI announced a multi-year, strategic partnership that provides AWS's world-class infrastructure to run and scale OpenAI's core artificial intelligence (AI) workloads starting immediately. Under this new $38 billion agreement, which will have continued growth over the next seven years, OpenAI is accessing AWS compute comprising hundreds of thousands of state-of-the-art NVIDIA GPUs, with the ability to expand to tens of millions of CPUs to rapidly scale agentic workloads.

In October 2025, Google Cloud and Adobe announced an expanded strategic partnership to deliver the next generation of AI-powered creative technologies. The partnership brings together Adobe's decades of creative expertise with Google's advanced AI models-including Gemini, Veo, and Imagen-to usher in a new era of creative expression.

In October 2025, Salesforce has announced that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Apromore, a global leader in process intelligence software. The acquisition aims to enhance Salesforce's capabilities in agentic process automation, helping organisations visualise, simulate, and improve their business processes in real time.

Product Types Covered:

  • MLOps Platforms
  • LLMOps Platforms
  • Bias & Fairness Tools
  • Data Privacy Platforms

Components Covered:

  • Solutions
  • Services

Deployment Modes Covered:

  • On-premises
  • Cloud

Functionalities Covered:

  • Model lifecycle governance
  • Risk & compliance management
  • Monitoring & auditing
  • Explainability & transparency
  • Ethical & responsible AI

Organization Sizes Covered:

  • Large Enterprises
  • Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

End Users Covered:

  • Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
  • Government & Defense
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • Retail & eCommerce
  • Manufacturing
  • Telecom & IT
  • Energy & Utilities

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global AI Governance Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 MLOps Platforms
  • 5.3 LLMOps Platforms
  • 5.4 Bias & Fairness Tools
  • 5.5 Data Privacy Platforms

6 Global AI Governance Market, By Component

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Solutions
  • 6.3 Services

7 Global AI Governance Market, By Deployment Mode

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 On-premises
  • 7.3 Cloud

8 Global AI Governance Market, By Functionality

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Model lifecycle governance
  • 8.3 Risk & compliance management
  • 8.4 Monitoring & auditing
  • 8.5 Explainability & transparency
  • 8.6 Ethical & responsible AI

9 Global AI Governance Market, By Organization Size

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Large Enterprises
  • 9.3 Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

10 Global AI Governance Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
  • 10.3 Government & Defense
  • 10.4 Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • 10.5 Retail & eCommerce
  • 10.6 Manufacturing
  • 10.7 Telecom & IT
  • 10.8 Energy & Utilities

11 Global AI Governance Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 IBM Corporation
  • 13.2 Microsoft Corporation
  • 13.3 Google
  • 13.4 Salesforce
  • 13.5 SAP SE
  • 13.6 Amazon Web Services (AWS)
  • 13.7 SAS Institute
  • 13.8 FICO
  • 13.9 Accenture
  • 13.10 H2O.AI
  • 13.11 DataRobot
  • 13.12 Domino Data Lab
  • 13.13 SparkCognition
  • 13.14 OneTrust
  • 13.15 Collibra

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By MLOps Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By LLMOps Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Bias & Fairness Tools (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Data Privacy Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Solutions (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Deployment Mode (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By On-premises (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Cloud (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Functionality (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Model lifecycle governance (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Risk & compliance management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Monitoring & auditing (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Explainability & transparency (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Ethical & responsible AI (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Organization Size (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Large Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Government & Defense (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Healthcare & Life Sciences (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Retail & eCommerce (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Manufacturing (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Telecom & IT (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global AI Governance Market Outlook, By Energy & Utilities (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.