封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1744662

2032年欠平衡鑽井市場預測:按部署類型、儲存類型、技術、最終用戶和地區進行的全球分析

Underbalanced Drilling Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Deployment Type, Reservoir Type, Technology, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據,全球欠平衡鑽井市場預計在 2025 年將達到 44 億美元,到 2032 年將達到 77 億美元,預測期內的複合年成長率為 8.2%。

欠平衡鑽井 (UBD) 是一種先進的鑽井技術,其特點是井筒壓力被有意保持在低於地層壓力的水平。這樣一來,鑽井過程中就會形成壓力差,迫使地層流體進入井筒,從而降低地層損害風險並提高儲存產能。 UBD 尤其適用於枯竭或敏感儲存,因為常規鑽井會導致嚴重的儲存失穩或循環漏失。透過最大限度地減少鑽井泥漿對地層的侵入,UBD 可以提高採收率並延長油井的生產壽命。專業設備和即時監控對於安全的 UBD 作業至關重要。

根據MMR的研究,預計到2023年,石油需求將增加686萬桶/日。因此,世界各國政府正在製定具有吸引力的投資策略,以提高精製能力,這將進一步促進市場成長。例如,2018年,印度石油公司宣布了一項策略,將投資約248.3億美元,用於提高煉油和鑽井能力、增加石化產品產量、擴大油氣業務以及擴展鑽井程序。

全球能源需求不斷成長,傳統資源日益枯竭

全球能源消耗不斷上升,加上易於開採的傳統型油氣蘊藏量持續下降,推動了對欠平衡鑽井(UBD)等更先進鑽井技術的需求。隨著傳統型油井產量下降,作業者正在尋找更有效率的方法,從複雜成熟的儲存中提取碳氫化合物。 UBD技術能夠在傳統過平衡條件下難以鑽探的環境中實現鑽井。 UBD技術最大限度地減少了對儲存的損害,並提高了產量,這對於滿足日益成長的能源需求至關重要。此外,該技術還能提高緻密地層的採收率,並減少地層流體的侵入。

某些地層的井不穩定性

儘管欠平衡鑽井技術優勢顯著,但它也面臨技術限制,尤其是在處理不穩定地層時。在裂縫、疏鬆或高滲透性區域作業可能導致井筒崩壞或壓差卡鑽,從而危及安全和效率。在此類環境中管理微妙的壓力平衡需要專業知識和即時監控系統。此外,在減壓條件下維持井筒完整性的複雜性限制了欠平衡鑽井在某些地區的廣泛應用。這些挑戰導致作業風險增加、停機時間延長,進而影響計劃進度和盈利。

生產儲層的早期檢測和動態測試

UBD 在儲存評估中具有獨特優勢,因為它可以在鑽井過程中即時識別產層。這種即時回饋有助於作業者最佳化井眼軌跡,更精準地鎖定產量區。無需中斷各個測試階段的作業,即可對各個區域進行動態測試,從而改善決策並降低探勘的不確定性。此外,該技術還能最大限度地減少地層損害,提升儲存特性分析品質及長期生產性能。對更聰明、更具成本效益的探勘方法的需求日益成長,為 UBD 技術在傳統型和傳統型油田的應用創造了巨大的機會。

初期投資和營運成本高

進入欠平衡鑽井的主要障礙之一是實施欠平衡鑽井所需的巨額資本和營運支出。欠平衡鑽井需要專用設備,例如旋轉控制設備(RCD)、壓縮機和先進的井控系統,這推高了整體成本。對熟練人員的需求以及全面的鑽前分析進一步增加了財務和後勤需求。中小型業者可能難以證明這些領先成本的合理性,尤其是在油價波動的環境下。此外,營運過程中意外的技術問題也會推高成本,並使預算和計劃規劃更加複雜。

COVID-19的影響

新冠疫情對本就處於供需失衡狀態的鑽井市場造成了喜憂參半的影響。全球封鎖和出行限制擾亂了供應鏈,推遲了鑽井計劃,並導致多個上游計劃停工。但這場危機也迫使產業重新評估成本結構和營運效率。隨著各公司尋求最佳化生產,同時最大限度地減少儲存損害並提高經濟效益,市場對不平衡鑽井(UBD)等技術的興趣日益濃厚。疫情加速了自動化和遠端監控系統在鑽井作業中的應用,間接促進了UBD在複雜井段的部署。從長遠來看,這種轉變預計將增強市場韌性並推動創新。

預測期內,壓井裝置部門預計將實現最大幅度成長

預計在預測期內,壓井裝置領域將佔據最大的市場佔有率,因為它在鑽桿插入和移除過程中保持壓力控制方面發揮著至關重要的作用。這些裝置廣泛應用於無法進行井下冷卻的帶壓作業。它們能夠處理高壓差並提高作業安全性,使其成為不平衡壓井(UBD)裝置中不可或缺的組成部分。隨著越來越多的作業公司轉向欠平衡技術以最大限度地提高儲存接觸面積,對可靠壓井設備的需求持續成長。此外,技術進步也使這些設備更有彈性多用,成本效益也更高。

預計預測期內油田服務公司部門的複合年成長率最高。

油田服務公司預計將在預測期內實現最高成長率,這得益於其在部署和管理諸如欠平衡鑽井(UBD)等複雜鑽井技術方面的專業知識。這些公司提供整合解決方案,將先進的設備、熟練的人員和數據分析相結合,以最佳化鑽井效果。隨著專業鑽井服務外包的興起,營運商越來越依賴服務供應商來管理欠平衡作業。油田數位化和績效付費合約的趨勢也推動了該領域的成長,這些趨勢鼓勵使用高效創新的鑽井技術。

佔比最大的地區:

預計亞太地區將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率。這種優勢可以歸因於對石油和天然氣探勘的巨額投資,尤其是在中國、印度和印尼等國家。隨著能源需求的成長以及海上和陸上盆地新油田的開發,人們正在採用UBD技術來提高高難度儲存的採收率。該地區政府的支持性政策以及與國際服務供應商的戰略夥伴關係關係也在推動市場擴張。此外,各國國家石油公司也越來越重視提高鑽井效率和減少對環境的影響。

複合年成長率最高的地區:

在預測期內,由於頁岩氣和緻密油等非傳統資源的快速發展,北美地區預計將呈現最高的複合年成長率。尤其是美國,它已成為採用創新鑽井技術來提高生產效率的領導者。該地區的營運商正在轉向使用不間斷鑽井技術 (UBD) 來解決地層損害等問題,並提高成熟井的產量。良好的法規環境、完善的油田基礎設施以及持續的技術進步,正在加速二疊紀和巴肯等主要盆地採用不間斷鑽井技術。

免費客製化服務:

訂閱此報告的客戶可以選擇以下免費自訂選項之一:

  • 公司簡介
    • 全面分析其他市場參與者(最多 3 家公司)
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 地理細分
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家市場進行估計、預測和複合年成長率(註:基於可行性檢查)
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 研究範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究資訊來源
    • 初級研究資訊來源
    • 次級研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 限制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 技術分析
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的影響

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買家的議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭對手之間的競爭

5. 全球欠平衡鑽井市場(依部署類型)

  • 不壓井作業裝置
  • 泥漿鑽井
  • 非旋轉頭
  • 旋轉頭
  • 流動鑽井
  • 撓曲油管鑽井
  • 其他部署類型

6. 全球欠平衡鑽井市場(依儲存類型)

  • 非傳統
    • 緻密氣
    • 煤層氣(CBM)
    • 頁岩氣
  • 傳統的

7. 全球欠平衡鑽井市場(按技術)

  • 氣體注入
  • 泡棉注射
  • 氣舉鑽井
  • 液體注射
  • 粉塵鑽孔
  • 其他技術

8. 全球欠平衡鑽井市場(依最終用戶)

  • 石油和天然氣探勘公司
  • 油田服務公司
  • 鑽井承包商
  • 其他最終用戶

9. 全球欠平衡鑽井市場(按地區)

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第10章 重大進展

  • 協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
  • 收購與合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第11章 公司概況

  • Schlumberger
  • Petrolor
  • Halliburton
  • National Oilwell Varco(NOV)
  • Weatherford International
  • Archer Limited
  • Trican Well Service
  • Superior Energy Services
  • Baker Hughes
  • Nabors Industries
  • AKITA Drilling Ltd.
  • Transocean
  • Calfrac Well Services
  • Maersk Drilling
  • Ensign Energy Services
  • Odfjell Drilling
  • Helmerich & Payne
  • NCS Multistage
Product Code: SMRC29710

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Underbalanced Drilling Market is accounted for $4.4 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $7.7 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast period. Underbalanced Drilling (UBD) is an advanced drilling technique in which the pressure in the wellbore is intentionally kept lower than the formation pressure. This creates a differential that allows formation fluids to flow into the wellbore while drilling, reducing the risk of formation damage and improving reservoir productivity. UBD is particularly useful in depleted or sensitive reservoirs where conventional drilling could cause severe wellbore instability or loss of circulation. By minimizing invasion of drilling fluids into the formation, it enhances recovery efficiency and extends the productive life of the well. Specialized equipment and real-time monitoring are essential for safe UBD operations.

According to MMR study, the oil demand is projected to grow by 6.86 Mn barrels a day by 2023. Thus, governments around the world have established attractive investment strategies to increase their refinery capacity that would further push market growth. For example, in 2018, Indian Oil Corporation declared its strategies to invest around USD 24.83 Bn to rise its refinery & drilling capacity, increase its petrochemical production, increase gas business, & extend its drilling procedure.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Increasing global energy demand and depletion of conventional resources

The rising worldwide energy consumption, coupled with the continuous decline of easily accessible conventional oil and gas reserves, is fueling the demand for more advanced drilling techniques such as underbalanced drilling (UBD). As conventional wells become less productive, operators are seeking more efficient methods to extract hydrocarbons from complex and mature reservoirs. UBD enables drilling in environments that would otherwise pose challenges under traditional overbalanced conditions. It minimizes reservoir damage and increases production rates, which is essential in meeting the surging energy requirements. Additionally, the technology supports enhanced recovery in tight formations and reduces formation fluid invasion.

Restraint:

Wellbore instability in certain formations

Despite its advantages, underbalanced drilling faces technical limitations, especially when dealing with unstable formations. Operating in fractured, unconsolidated, or highly permeable zones can lead to wellbore collapse or differential sticking, compromising both safety and efficiency. Managing the delicate balance of pressures in such environments requires specialized expertise and real-time monitoring systems. Furthermore, the complexity involved in maintaining well integrity under reduced pressure conditions limits the widespread adoption of UBD in certain regions. These challenges can lead to increased operational risks and downtime, affecting project timelines and profitability.

Opportunity:

Early detection and dynamic testing of productive intervals

UBD offers unique benefits in reservoir evaluation by allowing real-time identification of productive zones while drilling. This immediate feedback helps operators optimize well trajectories and target high-yield areas more accurately. The ability to test zones dynamically, without halting operations for separate testing phases, improves decision-making and reduces exploration uncertainty. Additionally, this technique minimizes formation damage, which enhances reservoir characterization and long-term production performance. The growing demand for smarter, more cost-efficient exploration methods is creating significant opportunities for UBD technology in both conventional and unconventional fields.

Threat:

High initial investment and operational costs

One of the key barriers to entry for underbalanced drilling is the significant capital and operational expenditure required for deployment. UBD necessitates specialized equipment such as rotating control devices (RCDs), compressors, and advanced well control systems, which add to the overall cost. The need for skilled personnel and thorough pre-drilling analysis further raises financial and logistical demands. Small- and mid-sized operators may find it difficult to justify these upfront expenses, especially in volatile oil price environments. Additionally, unforeseen technical issues during operations can escalate costs, making budgeting and project planning more complex.

Covid-19 Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic brought mixed consequences for the underbalanced drilling market. Global lockdowns and travel restrictions disrupted supply chains, delayed drilling schedules, and halted several upstream projects. However, the crisis also led to an industry-wide reevaluation of cost structures and operational efficiency. As companies sought to optimize production with minimal reservoir damage and better economics, interest in technologies like UBD increased. The pandemic accelerated the adoption of automation and remote monitoring systems in drilling operations, indirectly benefiting UBD deployment in complex wells. Long-term, these shifts are expected to enhance market resilience and drive technological innovation.

The snubbing units segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The snubbing units segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to their crucial role in maintaining pressure control while inserting or removing drill pipe. These units are widely used in live well operations where killing the well is not viable. Their ability to handle high-pressure differentials and improve operational safety makes them an essential component in UBD setups. As more operators shift towards underbalanced techniques to maximize reservoir contact, the demand for reliable snubbing equipment continues to rise. Additionally, technological advancements have made these units more versatile and cost-efficient.

The oilfield service companies segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the oilfield service companies segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, due to their expertise in deploying and managing complex drilling technologies like UBD. These companies offer integrated solutions, combining advanced equipment, skilled personnel, and data analytics to optimize drilling outcomes. With increasing outsourcing of specialized drilling services, operators are relying more on service providers to manage underbalanced operations. The segment's growth is also driven by the trend toward digital oilfields and performance-based contracts, which encourage the use of efficient and innovative drilling practices.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share. This dominance is attributed to the region's substantial investment in oil and gas exploration, particularly in countries like China, India, and Indonesia. With growing energy demand and the development of new fields in offshore and onshore basins, UBD is being adopted to enhance recovery from challenging reservoirs. The region's supportive government policies and strategic partnerships with international service providers are also driving market expansion. Furthermore, national oil companies are increasingly focusing on improving drilling efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, owing to the rapid development of unconventional resources such as shale gas and tight oil. The United States, in particular, has emerged as a leader in adopting innovative drilling technologies to increase production efficiency. Operators in the region are leveraging UBD to address issues like formation damage and to enhance production from mature wells. A favorable regulatory environment, well-established oilfield infrastructure, and continuous technological advancements are accelerating UBD adoption across key basins such as the Permian and Bakken.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Underbalanced Drilling Market include Schlumberger, Petrolor, Halliburton, National Oilwell Varco (NOV), Weatherford International, Archer Limited, Trican Well Service, Superior Energy Services, Baker Hughes, Nabors Industries, AKITA Drilling Ltd., Transocean, Calfrac Well Services, Maersk Drilling, Ensign Energy Services, Odfjell Drilling, Helmerich & Payne and NCS Multistage.

Key Developments:

In April 2025, Halliburton and Nabors Industries achieved the first fully automated surface and subsurface execution of rotary and slide drilling operations in Oman. The integration of the companies' digital solutions delivered land-based, closed-loop drilling solutions to improve operational efficiency, consistency, and real-time decision-making capabilities.

In April 2024, Global technology company SLB announced a partnership with Shell to deploy Petrel(TM) subsurface software across its assets worldwide. The adoption of Petrel software is designed to increase digital capabilities and drive operating cost efficiencies. Shell will use Petrel software powered by advanced AI to deliver seismic interpretation workflows.

Deployment Types Covered:

  • Snubbing Units
  • Mud Cap Drilling
  • Non-rotating Head
  • Rotating Head
  • Flow Drilling
  • Coiled Tubing Drilling
  • Other Deployment Types

Reservoir Types Covered:

  • Unconventional
  • Conventional

Technologies Covered:

  • Gas Injection
  • Foam Injection
  • Arlift Drilling
  • Liquid Injection
  • Dust Drilling
  • Other Technologies

End Users Covered:

  • Oil & Gas Exploration Companies
  • Oilfield Service Companies
  • Drilling Contractors
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Technology Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Deployment Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Snubbing Units
  • 5.3 Mud Cap Drilling
  • 5.4 Non-rotating Head
  • 5.5 Rotating Head
  • 5.6 Flow Drilling
  • 5.7 Coiled Tubing Drilling
  • 5.8 Other Deployment Types

6 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Reservoir Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Unconventional
    • 6.2.1 Tight Gas
    • 6.2.2 Coal Bed Methane (CBM)
    • 6.2.3 Shale Gas
  • 6.3 Conventional

7 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Technology

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Gas Injection
  • 7.3 Foam Injection
  • 7.4 Arlift Drilling
  • 7.5 Liquid Injection
  • 7.6 Dust Drilling
  • 7.7 Other Technologies

8 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By End User

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Oil & Gas Exploration Companies
  • 8.3 Oilfield Service Companies
  • 8.4 Drilling Contractors
  • 8.5 Other End Users

9 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Geography

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 North America
    • 9.2.1 US
    • 9.2.2 Canada
    • 9.2.3 Mexico
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.2 UK
    • 9.3.3 Italy
    • 9.3.4 France
    • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 9.4 Asia Pacific
    • 9.4.1 Japan
    • 9.4.2 China
    • 9.4.3 India
    • 9.4.4 Australia
    • 9.4.5 New Zealand
    • 9.4.6 South Korea
    • 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 9.5 South America
    • 9.5.1 Argentina
    • 9.5.2 Brazil
    • 9.5.3 Chile
    • 9.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 9.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 9.6.2 UAE
    • 9.6.3 Qatar
    • 9.6.4 South Africa
    • 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

10 Key Developments

  • 10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 10.3 New Product Launch
  • 10.4 Expansions
  • 10.5 Other Key Strategies

11 Company Profiling

  • 11.1 Schlumberger
  • 11.2 Petrolor
  • 11.3 Halliburton
  • 11.4 National Oilwell Varco (NOV)
  • 11.5 Weatherford International
  • 11.6 Archer Limited
  • 11.7 Trican Well Service
  • 11.8 Superior Energy Services
  • 11.9 Baker Hughes
  • 11.10 Nabors Industries
  • 11.11 AKITA Drilling Ltd.
  • 11.12 Transocean
  • 11.13 Calfrac Well Services
  • 11.14 Maersk Drilling
  • 11.15 Ensign Energy Services
  • 11.16 Odfjell Drilling
  • 11.17 Helmerich & Payne
  • 11.18 NCS Multistage

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Deployment Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Snubbing Units (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Mud Cap Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Non-rotating Head (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Rotating Head (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Flow Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Coiled Tubing Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other Deployment Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Reservoir Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Unconventional (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Tight Gas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Coal Bed Methane (CBM) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Shale Gas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Conventional (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Technology (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Gas Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Foam Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Arlift Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Liquid Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Dust Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other Technologies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Oil & Gas Exploration Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Oilfield Service Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Drilling Contractors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.