查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
直接空氣捕獲(DAC)企業:Guidehouse Research Leaderboard
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1794195

直接空氣捕獲(DAC)企業:Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Report: Direct Air Capture Companies - Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 23 Direct Air Capture Companies
出版日期: | 出版商: Guidehouse Research | 英文 83 Pages | 訂單完成後即時交付

價格

工程化和基於自然的二氧化碳去除 (CDR) 方法可以降低空氣中二氧化碳的淨濃度，因此在減緩全球氣候變遷方面發揮關鍵作用。然而，該行業正處於關鍵的轉折點，其特點是需求集中但有限，供應分散。

直接空氣捕獲 (DAC) 是一種工程化的 CDR 技術，通常使用固體吸附劑和液體溶劑直接從空氣中提取二氧化碳。捕獲的二氧化碳被釋放，溶劑或吸附劑利用壓力、溫度或電化學勢進行再生。每種 DAC 製程對能源、溫度、水和土地利用的要求各不相同。

有些 DAC 公司具有全球視野，而有些則專注於北美或其他特定地區。有些公司成立已有十多年，而許多公司則相對較新。 Guidehouse 研究排行榜上的 23 家公司被公認為 DAC 領域的當前領導者。市場格局正在發生變化，2023 年排行榜上僅有 5 家公司仍名列 2025 年排行榜。

本報告研究了直接空氣捕獲 (DAC) 市場，並提供了 23 家公司的詳細資訊。

目錄

第1章 摘要整理

  • 市場簡介
  • Guidehouse Research Leaderboard電網

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場定義
  • 計劃的形勢
  • 推動市場要素
  • 市場障礙
  • 市場趨勢
    • 政策支援
    • 美國的DAC集線器
    • 歐洲的ETS

第3章 Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

  • Guidehouse Research Leaderboard範疇
    • 領導者
    • 競爭者
    • 課題者
    • 追隨者
  • Guidehouse Research Leaderboard電網

第4章 企業排行榜

  • 領導者
    • Carbon Engineering
  • 競爭者
    • Climeworks
    • Aircapture
    • Heirloom
    • CarbonCapture
    • DACMA
    • Spiritus
    • Soletair Power
    • Airhive
  • 課題者
    • Skytree
    • Capture6
    • Avnos
    • Sustaera
    • Heimdal
    • 280 Earth
    • Phlair
    • Clairity
    • RepAir
    • Removr
    • 8 Rivers
    • Carbon Collect
  • 追隨者
    • GE Vernova
    • Origen Carbon

第5章 縮寫和簡稱的清單

第6章 目錄

第7章 圖表

第8章 調查範圍和調查手法

Product Code: LB-CMF-25

Engineered and nature-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods play a key role in global climate change mitigation, as they can reduce net atmospheric CO2 levels. However, the industry is entering a critical transition phase, characterized by concentrated but limited demand, and fragmented supply.

Direct air capture (DAC) is an engineered CDR technology that extracts CO2 directly from the atmosphere, typically using solid sorbents or liquid solvents. The captured CO2 is then released, and the solvent or sorbent is regenerated using pressure or temperature swings, or electrochemical potential. Differing DAC processes vary in their energy, temperature, water, and land-use requirements.

Some DAC companies possess a global vision, while others remain focused on North America or another specific region. While a few were founded over a decade ago, many are relatively new. The 23 companies included in this Guidehouse Research Leaderboard are recognized as current leaders in the DAC space. Signifying a shifting market landscape, only five companies that featured in the 2023 edition remain in the 2025 Leaderboard.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Project Landscape
  • 2.3 Market Drivers
  • 2.4 Market Barriers
  • 2.5 Market Trends
    • 2.5.1 Policy Support
    • 2.5.2 U.S. DAC Hubs
    • 2.5.3 European ETS

3. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 Carbon Engineering
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 Climeworks
    • 4.2.2 Aircapture
    • 4.2.3 Heirloom
    • 4.2.4 CarbonCapture
    • 4.2.5 DACMA
    • 4.2.6 Spiritus
    • 4.2.7 Soletair Power
    • 4.2.8 Airhive
  • 4.3 Challengers
    • 4.3.1 Skytree
    • 4.3.2 Capture6
    • 4.3.3 Avnos
    • 4.3.4 Sustaera
    • 4.3.5 Heimdal
    • 4.3.6 280 Earth
    • 4.3.7 Phlair
    • 4.3.8 Clairity
    • 4.3.9 RepAir
    • 4.3.10 Removr
    • 4.3.11 8 Rivers
    • 4.3.12 Carbon Collect
  • 4.4 Followers
    • 4.4.1 GE Vernova
    • 4.4.2 Origen Carbon

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1 Scope of Study
  • 8.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

  • Table 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Overall Scores

List of Figures

  • Chart 1-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid: DAC Companies
  • Chart 2-1. Active vs. Passive DAC Cumulative Capture Capacities by Project Stage
  • Chart 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid: DAC Companies
  • Chart 4-1. Carbon Engineering Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-2. Climeworks Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-3. Aircapture Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-4. Heirloom Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-5. CarbonCapture Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-6. DACMA Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-7. Spiritus Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-8. Soletair Power Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-9. Airhive Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-10. Skytree Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-11. Capture6 Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-12. Avnos Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-13. Sustaera Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-14. Heimdal Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-15. 280 Earth Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-16. Phlair Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-17. Clairity Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-18. RepAir Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-19. Removr Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-20. 8 Rivers Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-21. Carbon Collect Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-22. GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-23. Origen Carbon Strategy and Execution Scores