查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2012635

1,4-丁二醇市場：2026-2032年全球市場預測（依產品類型、製造流程、通路、應用及最終用途產業分類）

1,4-Butanediol Market by Type, Production Process, Distribution Channel, Application, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 196 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計 1,4-丁二醇市場在 2025 年的價值為 38.7 億美元，在 2026 年成長至 40.6 億美元，到 2032 年達到 57 億美元，年複合成長率為 5.67%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025 38.7億美元
預計年份：2026年 40.6億美元
預測年份 2032 57億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 5.67%

簡要概述現代化學價值鏈中 1,4-丁二醇的發展趨勢，重點在於供應鏈壓力、原料趨勢、監管影響和最終用途依賴性。

全球化學工業正經歷快速轉型，而1,4-丁二醇則處於先進材料、特殊溶劑和關鍵性能中間體的交匯點。作為一種用途廣泛的二醇，該分子可為許多下游化學反應和聚合物提供原料，其供應鏈趨勢對汽車、塗料、製藥和聚合物價值鏈產生連鎖反應。從製造商和分銷商到終端用戶化合物生產商，經銷商都需要清晰、基於證據的相關人員，以了解當前促進因素、風險因素和戰略轉折點，這些因素將影響他們近期的採購和創新決策。

重塑 1,4-丁二醇生態系統的關鍵變革因素包括生產技術的創新、對永續性的需求、下游製程配方的變化以及供應鏈的本地化。

1,4-丁二醇的市場格局正受到多項變革性變化的影響而重塑，這些變化同時發生且以非線性方式相互作用。生產技術的進步，包括改進的催化製程和可擴展的發酵技術，降低了替代生產商的進入門檻，使新參與企業能夠憑藉特定特性而非單純的成本優勢競爭。這種技術成熟度與產業日益關注的全生命週期環境績效相輔相成，推動採購活動轉向更具可追溯性和低碳性的原料來源。

2025 年關稅調整如何引發採購即時轉變，促使區域產能審查，並加速整個 1,4-丁二醇供應鏈的策略風險降低。

美國於2025年實施的關稅政策，為包括1,4-丁二醇相關前驅物和衍生物在內的化學中間體的國際分銷增添了新的複雜性。這項關稅調整促使進出口商立即重新評估，採購團隊也隨之修訂採購矩陣，以平衡到貨成本、交貨前置作業時間和交易對象風險。作為應對措施，許多下游製造商開始短期轉向擁有成熟區域分銷網路的供應商，即使單價名義上更高，以維持生產的連續性並減輕清關和合規的負擔。

一個多維細分框架，用於明確特定應用需求、生產路線、類型差異和分銷管道權衡，從而指導策略定位。

要了解市場動態，需要根據下游化學製程、生產方法和商業管道進行細緻的市場區隔。從應用角度來看，需求分析區分了γ-丁內酯和四氫呋喃路線。每條路線都針對不同的配方和聚合物需求，並有其獨特的監管和處理要求。這種區分有助於明確供應商的適用性以及對買家的技術服務要求。根據最終用途產業，汽車、塗料、製藥和聚合物產業被細分為多個觀點。聚合物本身進一步細分為聚酯多元醇、氨綸和熱塑性聚氨酯。每個子領域都有特定的性能標準、純度要求和批間均勻性要求，這些都會影響供應商的選擇和價值提案。

美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的區域法規結構、供應風險接受度和製造地密度如何塑造差異化的採購和投資策略。

需求推動要素、管理體制和原料供應方面的區域差異，對企業如何設計供應鏈和商業策略產生了顯著影響。在美洲，由於接近性大規模製造群以及產品組合多元化的機會，區域供應鏈的韌性成為企業優先考慮的因素。該地區的企業通常優先考慮物流效率和供應商的應對力，以滿足短週期生產的需求。在歐洲、中東和非洲，日益嚴格的監管和對永續發展報告的要求，對採購產生了重大影響，許多買家都在尋求能夠支持脫碳努力和生產者延伸責任（EPR）目標的原料。亞太地區仍然是重要的生產和需求中心，其一體化的石化產業群聚、多元化的能源經濟以及密集的製造業生態系統，既創造了規模化發展的機遇，也帶來了複雜的競爭格局。

生產商和專業公司之間的競爭和策略投資趨勢將決定他們能否滿足人們對品質、永續性和服務日益成長的期望。

1,4-丁二醇市場的競爭格局呈現出傳統化學企業、特種中間體生產商以及利用新型生產通路、技術導向的新興參與企業的多元化格局。主要企業往往透過結合可靠性、原料柔軟性以及為下游混配生產商提供的全面技術服務來競爭。許多成熟的生產商利用規模經濟和一體化的原料採購網路，確保產品規格的一致性和物流的可靠性。同時，小規模的專業公司則透過高純度產品、定製配方以及與客戶的緊密合作開發來脫穎而出。

為生產商和供應商制定可操作的策略重點，以增強韌性，深化與客戶的夥伴關係，並加速永續生產路徑。

行業領導企業應採取一系列積極措施，將商業性韌性與創新和永續性目標相結合。首先，他們應優先考慮原料和生產方式的多元化，以減少對單一來源的依賴，並快速應對關稅和貿易中斷。這包括投資模組化生產單元，並在必要時評估基於發酵製程的策略夥伴關係。其次，他們應透過將技術支援、法規諮詢和品質可追溯性納入商業契約，提升供應商的價值提案。這些服務可以降低客戶轉換成本，並加強長期合作關係。

採用混合方法研究途徑，結合相關人員訪談、技術文獻綜述和政策分析，對生產和供應鏈動態進行了多方面的檢驗。

本執行摘要的研究基礎紮實，透過結合質性綜合分析以及一手和二手研究資料收集，為本文提出的見解奠定了堅實的基礎。一手資料包括對上游生產商、經銷商和下游複合材料製造商的採購經理、研發經理和銷售經理進行的結構化訪談，從而直接觀點採購因素、技術限制和服務期望。此外，還進行了技術文獻綜述，檢驗了催化合成和發酵技術的最新進展、雜質譜以及材料適用性研究，以證明其應用適用性。

簡潔策略建議強調，要協調技術能力、靈活採購和服務差異化，以確保在不斷發展的 1,4-丁二醇市場中保持長期競爭力。

總而言之，1,4-丁二醇目前的市場環境受到技術創新、永續性期望和貿易政策趨勢等多重因素的共同影響。這些因素共同推動著生產體係朝向更靈活的模式轉變，供應商服務日益差異化，原料特性與終端用戶需求也更加緊密地匹配。積極調整籌資策略、投資多元化生產技術並優先考慮服務主導差異化的決策者，將更有能力應對不確定性，並最大限度地掌握高階定位的新機會。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章：調查方法

  • 調查設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查的前提
  • 研究限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會映射
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依類型分類

  • 生物衍生
  • 石油衍生的

第9章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依生產流程分類

  • 化學合成
  • 發酵

第10章：1,4-丁二醇市場：依分銷通路分類

  • 直銷
  • 銷售代理

第11章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依應用領域分類

  • γ-丁內酯
  • 四氫呋喃

第12章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依最終用途產業分類

  • 車
  • 畫
  • 製藥
  • 聚合物
    • 聚酯多元醇
    • 氨綸
    • 熱塑性聚氨酯

第13章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依地區分類

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依組別分類

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章 1,4-丁二醇市場：依國家分類

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章：美國1,4-丁二醇市場

第17章：中國1,4-丁二醇市場

第18章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Ascend Performance Materials LLC
  • Ashland Inc.
  • BASF SE
  • Chang Chun Group
  • China Petrochemical Corporation
  • Dairen Chemical Corporation
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Genomatica, Inc.
  • Grupa Azoty SA
  • Henan Kaixiang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Huntsman Corporation
  • Invista Sa rl
  • Jiangsu Hailun Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • LANXESS AG
  • LyondellBasell Industries NV
  • Markor Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
  • Novamont SpA
  • Saudi International Petrochemical Company
  • Shanxi Sanwei Group Co., Ltd.
  • Solvay SA
  • The Dow Chemical Company
  • Xinjiang Tianye Group Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-43649B5EE3A3

The 1,4-Butanediol Market was valued at USD 3.87 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.06 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.67%, reaching USD 5.70 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 3.87 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 4.06 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 5.70 billion
CAGR (%) 5.67%

A concise orientation to 1,4-butanediol dynamics that clarifies supply chain pressures, feedstock trends, regulatory influences, and end-use dependencies in modern chemical value chains

The global chemical landscape is undergoing rapid transformation, and 1,4-butanediol sits at an intersection of advanced materials, specialty solvents, and performance-critical intermediates. As a versatile diol, this molecule feeds into a broad set of downstream chemistries and polymers, and its supply chain dynamics ripple across automotive, coatings, pharmaceutical, and polymer value chains. Stakeholders from manufacturers to distributors and end-use formulators require a clear, evidence-based view of current drivers, risk vectors, and strategic inflection points that will shape sourcing and innovation decisions in the near term.

In recent years, innovation in production pathways, rising attention to feedstock sustainability, and evolving regulatory scrutiny on chemical intermediates have collectively reshaped procurement and investment calculus. Consequently, corporates are re-evaluating their supplier footprints, risk mitigation strategies, and backward integration opportunities. This executive summary synthesizes the essential trends affecting production, distribution, and end-use adoption of 1,4-butanediol, providing decision-makers with a concise foundation to align commercial plans and R&D priorities with the prevailing market realities.

Key disruptive forces reshaping the 1,4-butanediol ecosystem including production innovation, sustainability imperatives, shifting downstream formulations, and supply chain regionalization

The landscape for 1,4-butanediol is being reshaped by several transformative shifts that are occurring concurrently and interacting in nonlinear ways. Technological advancements in production, including improved catalytic processes and scalable fermentation techniques, have lowered barriers for alternative producers and enabled new entrants to compete on specialty attributes rather than pure cost. This technical maturation complements heightened industry attention to lifecycle environmental performance, which is steering procurement toward more traceable and lower-carbon feedstock pathways.

At the same time, downstream demand profiles are evolving: polymers and elastomers that rely on 1,4-butanediol intermediates are being reformulated to meet stricter durability and sustainability requirements, prompting closer collaboration between raw material suppliers and formulators. Geopolitical shifts and trade policy volatility have also accelerated interest in regional sourcing strategies, creating incentives for supply chain redundancies and buffer inventories. As these forces converge, companies that adapt by investing in flexible manufacturing, modular capacity, and collaborative R&D partnerships will capture disproportionate advantage, while those that remain reliant on legacy sourcing models risk margin compression and supply interruptions.

Moreover, the industry is seeing a parallel rise in demand for value-added services from suppliers, such as technical support for formulation optimization, regulatory compliance assistance, and supply continuity guarantees. These differentiated services are becoming critical purchasing criteria, particularly for customers operating in highly regulated end-use sectors. Taken together, the transformative shifts signal a move from commoditized trading toward integrated supplier relationships, anchored by sustainability credentials, technical collaboration, and resilient, regionally diversified supply chains.

How the 2025 tariff adjustments triggered immediate procurement shifts, prompted regional capacity considerations, and accelerated strategic de-risking across 1,4-butanediol supply chains

United States tariff policy implemented in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity to the international flows of chemical intermediates, including precursors and derivatives linked to 1,4-butanediol. The tariff adjustments prompted immediate recalibration among importers and exporters, with procurement teams revising sourcing matrices to balance landed cost against lead time and counterparty risk. In response, many downstream manufacturers initiated a near-term shift toward suppliers with established regional distribution, even when unit prices were nominally higher, to preserve production continuity and simplify customs and compliance burdens.

Beyond procurement tactics, the tariff changes accelerated strategic conversations about onshore production and capacity rationalization. Firms with the ability to pivot production footprints leveraged contract renegotiations and long-term offtake arrangements to mitigate tariff exposure. Additionally, supply chain managers placed greater emphasis on tariff classification accuracy and origin documentation to minimize unexpected duties and to exploit any applicable trade preference programs. Over time, these adjustments are likely to favor suppliers that can demonstrate transparent origin chains, efficient logistics, and the ability to adapt pricing models to incorporate tariff volatility.

Importantly, the tariff environment also influenced innovation pipelines. Some companies prioritized product formulations and material substitutions that reduced dependency on tariff-exposed imports. Others expedited investments in domestic or nearshore production technologies, including modular reactors and fermentation units, to reduce exposure to cross-border cost swings. As a result, the 2025 tariff landscape did not merely affect transactional economics; it catalyzed structural shifts in sourcing strategy, capital allocation, and product development priorities across the 1,4-butanediol value chain.

A multi-dimensional segmentation framework that clarifies application-specific requirements, production pathways, type distinctions, and channel tradeoffs to guide strategic positioning

Understanding market dynamics requires careful segmentation that aligns with downstream chemistry pathways, production modalities, and commercial channels. By application, demand analysis differentiates between gamma-butyrolactone and tetrahydrofuran pathways, each of which supports distinct formulatory and polymer needs and carries unique regulatory and handling considerations; this distinction informs supply compatibility and technical service requirements for buyers. Based on end-use industry, a granular view segregates automotive, coatings, pharmaceuticals, and polymers, where polymers themselves are further dissected into polyester polyols, spandex, and thermoplastic polyurethane; each subsegment imposes specific performance thresholds, purity expectations, and batch-to-batch consistency demands that influence supplier selection and value propositions.

When assessing type, the market bifurcates into bio-based and petroleum-based offerings, a division that increasingly dictates procurement specifications as sustainability targets and consumer-facing claims grow more consequential. Production process segmentation contrasts chemical synthesis with fermentation; process choice affects impurity profiles, scalability, and cost structures, which in turn shape which end-use applications a feedstock can viably support. Finally, distribution channel segmentation differentiates direct sales from distributor-led models, each offering tradeoffs between contractual security, technical support depth, and logistic flexibility. Together, these segmentation lenses enable nuanced go-to-market strategies, targeted product development, and tailored commercial propositions that resonate with discrete customer cohorts across the value chain.

How regional regulatory frameworks, supply risk tolerance, and manufacturing density in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape differentiated sourcing and investment strategies

Regional variations in demand drivers, regulatory regimes, and feedstock availability materially influence how businesses design their supply chains and commercial strategies. In the Americas, proximity to large manufacturing clusters and portfolio diversification opportunities makes regional supply resilience a priority, and companies there often prioritize logistic efficiency and supplier responsiveness to meet fast-cycle production demands. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and sustainability reporting expectations exert substantial influence on procurement, with many buyers seeking feedstocks that support decarbonization commitments and extended producer responsibility goals. The Asia-Pacific region remains a pivotal production and demand hub, where integrated petrochemical complexes, varied energy economics, and dense manufacturing ecosystems create both opportunities for scale and complexity in competitive dynamics.

These regional distinctions inform investments in local production, inventory management, and technical support capabilities. For instance, regulatory frameworks in Europe, Middle East & Africa may incentivize greener production pathways and closer manufacturer-supplier collaboration on compliance, whereas commercial sensitivity to price and scale in Asia-Pacific often favors cost-efficient, high-throughput producers. Meanwhile, companies operating in the Americas frequently balance considerations of nearshoring and trade policy exposure to ensure continuity for automotive and polymer customers. Recognizing these regional nuances enables suppliers to design differentiated value propositions that address localized risk tolerances, regulatory obligations, and customer service expectations.

Competitive positioning and strategic investment trends among producers and specialty players that determine who can meet rising quality, sustainability, and service expectations

Competitive dynamics in the 1,4-butanediol landscape reflect a mix of legacy chemical producers, specialty intermediates manufacturers, and technologically focused entrants exploiting novel production pathways. Leading players tend to compete on a combination of reliability, feedstock flexibility, and the depth of technical service they provide to downstream formulators. Many incumbent producers leverage scale and integrated feedstock access to offer consistent product specifications and secure logistics, while smaller, specialty-focused firms differentiate through high-purity grades, tailored formulations, and closer co-development with customers.

Capital investment patterns reveal that companies prioritizing modular, decarbonized production routes are gaining strategic visibility from customers seeking lower lifecycle impacts. At the same time, distributors and commercial intermediaries maintain an essential role in aggregating demand across small and medium-sized end-users, enabling suppliers to reach a broader customer base without replicating sales infrastructure. Strategic alliances and joint ventures have emerged as common mechanisms to combine technical expertise with market access, and firms that invest in digital platforms for order visibility, quality traceability, and compliance documentation are better positioned to win long-term contracts. Ultimately, firms that integrate reliability with demonstrable sustainability credentials and robust customer support are most likely to command premium positioning in a market where service differentiation increasingly complements product quality.

Actionable strategic priorities for producers and suppliers to strengthen resilience, deepen customer partnerships, and accelerate sustainable production pathways

Industry leaders should pursue a set of proactive measures that align commercial resilience with innovation and sustainability goals. First, prioritize diversification of feedstock and production modalities to reduce single-source exposure and to enable rapid response to tariff or trade disruptions. This includes investing in modular production units and evaluating strategic partnerships for fermentation-based routes where appropriate. Second, enhance supplier value propositions by embedding technical support, regulatory advisory, and quality traceability into commercial contracts; such services reduce switching costs for customers and reinforce long-term relationships.

Third, accelerate product stewardship initiatives by documenting lifecycle footprints and collaborating with downstream customers to validate application-specific performance for bio-based and alternative-process derived materials. Fourth, develop regionally calibrated logistics and inventory strategies that reflect local regulatory landscapes and end-user lead times; this ensures that supply continuity is maintained without unnecessarily inflating working capital. Finally, foster cross-functional collaboration between commercial, technical, and compliance teams to translate market intelligence into product roadmaps and contracting approaches. Executed together, these measures will enhance responsiveness to market shifts, improve customer retention, and position firms to capture value from premium service and sustainable product attributes.

A mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy analysis to triangulate insights on production and supply chain dynamics

The research behind this executive summary combined qualitative synthesis with primary and secondary evidence gathering to form a robust foundation for the insights herein. Primary input included structured interviews with procurement leaders, R&D heads, and commercial managers across upstream producers, distributors, and downstream formulators, which provided direct perspectives on procurement drivers, technical constraints, and service expectations. These interviews were complemented by technical literature reviews that examined advances in catalytic synthesis and fermentation technologies, impurity profiles, and material compatibility studies that inform application suitability.

Secondary sources included regulatory filings, trade policy announcements, and industry publications that informed analysis of tariff impacts and regional regulatory pressures. Data triangulation was applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and validate observed trends; where divergent perspectives emerged, the analysis prioritized operational realities cited by supply chain and manufacturing stakeholders. Throughout, methodological rigor emphasized transparency in assumptions, clear delineation between observed behavior and interpretive insight, and sensitivity to regional variation in regulatory and commercial practices. This mixed-methods approach supports conclusions that are grounded in practitioner experience while being informed by technical and policy contexts relevant to 1,4-butanediol dynamics.

Concise strategic takeaways that emphasize aligning technical capability, flexible sourcing, and service differentiation to secure long-term advantage in the evolving 1,4-butanediol landscape

In summary, the current environment for 1,4-butanediol is characterized by converging pressures from technological innovation, sustainability expectations, and trade policy dynamics. These forces are collectively prompting a transition toward more flexible production footprints, differentiated supplier services, and tighter alignment between raw material characteristics and end-use requirements. Decision-makers that proactively adapt procurement strategies, invest in diversified production technologies, and emphasize service-led differentiation will be best positioned to navigate uncertainty and to capitalize on emerging opportunities for premium positioning.

Looking ahead, the imperative is clear: integrate technical capability with commercial agility. By doing so, organizations can ensure supply continuity, meet evolving regulatory and customer expectations, and maintain competitive advantage in a market where the interplay of feedstock origin, production process, and end-use performance increasingly determines long-term commercial success.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Bio Based
  • 8.2. Petroleum Based

9. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Production Process

  • 9.1. Chemical Synthesis
  • 9.2. Fermentation

10. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 10.1. Direct Sales
  • 10.2. Distributors

11. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Gamma Butyrolactone
  • 11.2. Tetrahydrofuran

12. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by End-Use Industry

  • 12.1. Automotive
  • 12.2. Coatings
  • 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
  • 12.4. Polymers
    • 12.4.1. Polyester Polyols
    • 12.4.2. Spandex
    • 12.4.3. Thermoplastic Polyurethane

13. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States 1,4-Butanediol Market

17. China 1,4-Butanediol Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Ascend Performance Materials LLC
  • 18.6. Ashland Inc.
  • 18.7. BASF SE
  • 18.8. Chang Chun Group
  • 18.9. China Petrochemical Corporation
  • 18.10. Dairen Chemical Corporation
  • 18.11. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • 18.12. Evonik Industries AG
  • 18.13. Genomatica, Inc.
  • 18.14. Grupa Azoty S.A.
  • 18.15. Henan Kaixiang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 18.16. Huntsman Corporation
  • 18.17. Invista S.a r.l.
  • 18.18. Jiangsu Hailun Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • 18.19. LANXESS AG
  • 18.20. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
  • 18.21. Markor Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • 18.22. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
  • 18.23. Novamont S.p.A.
  • 18.24. Saudi International Petrochemical Company
  • 18.25. Shanxi Sanwei Group Co., Ltd.
  • 18.26. Solvay S.A.
  • 18.27. The Dow Chemical Company
  • 18.28. Xinjiang Tianye Group Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)