查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1921188

1-萘硼酸市場按應用、純度等級、物理形態和供應商類型分類－2026-2032年全球預測

1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market by Application, Purity Grade, Physical Form, Supplier Type - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 199 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

2025 年 1-萘硼酸市值為 1.5484 億美元，預計到 2026 年將成長至 1.6978 億美元，年複合成長率為 9.65%，到 2032 年將達到 2.9521 億美元。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 1.5484億美元
預計年份：2026年 1.6978億美元
預測年份 2032 2.9521億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 9.65%

權威的介紹，定義了該化合物的化學性質、在合成中的作用、處理注意事項以及跨行業的應用價值。

1-萘硼酸是一類有機硼化合物，其結構中包含一個萘環和一個硼酸官能基，具有促進碳-碳鍵形成和交叉偶聯反應的反應活性。在合成化學中，它們因其與鈀催化的Suzuki-Miyaura偶聯反應的兼容性而備受重視，能夠高效構建二芳基結構，而這些結構是農藥、活性藥物成分和先進有機材料的核心組成部分。這些化合物通常以固體存在，根據操作和後續加工的需求，可以製備成粉末或溶液形式。

本文從策略角度概述了供應鏈韌性、永續性要務和應用主導創新如何重新定義採購和開發策略。

隨著供應鏈韌性、永續性和先進應用需求的融合，1-萘硼酸的市場環境正在發生變化，採購和研發重點也隨之重塑。在供應方面，採購團隊越來越重視多供應商網路和合約條款，這些條款在純度等級和物理形態方面具有柔軟性。為了應對這些變化，製造商和經銷商正在實現生產基地多元化，對替代原料進行認證，並最佳化物流以減少對前置作業時間的依賴。這些營運方面的改變與對環境、社會和管治(ESG) 實踐的日益重視相輔相成，推動了對更環保的合成路線和溶劑回收系統的逐步投資。

分析關稅如何增加採購流程的複雜性，加速供應商多元化，並促使整個價值鏈採取戰術性營運應對措施。

關稅和貿易措施的實施對參與特種有機硼化學品生產、分銷和應用的相關人員產生了重大的營運和策略影響。進口化學中間體關稅的提高影響了供應商的定價模式，並推高了到岸成本，促使買家重新評估總擁有成本 (TCO)，而不僅僅依賴標價。這些與關稅相關的壓力促使企業更加關注供應商多元化、關鍵原料加工環節的近岸外包以及簽訂包含靈活條款的長期契約，以降低價格波動風險。

將應用需求、純度等級、物理形態和供應商層級與規格、物流和合規性結果連結起來的綜合細分分析

細分市場分析揭示了需求和供應策略如何因應用、純度、物理形態和供應商層級而異，每個維度都影響著規格要求、前置作業時間和認證流程。依應用領域分類，其用途涵蓋農業化學中間體、電子製造、材料科學和醫藥中間體。農業化學中間體領域進一步細分為殺菌劑、除草劑和殺蟲劑，這些產品需要精確的雜質譜和批次間一致性，以滿足監管和現場性能標準。電子製造應用對污染物特別敏感，目前正在印刷基板生產和半導體製造領域進行深入探索，這兩個領域都需要微量金屬控制和製程可重複性。在材料科學領域，塗料、光電和聚合物添加劑應用正在探索中，這些應用依賴化合物的特性來實現電子功能、黏附性調節和光學調節。在醫藥中間體領域，目前正在對原料藥生產和藥物發現研究進行評估，這兩個領域對純度容差和文件要求各不相同。

從區域觀點，探討地理供應叢集、管理體制和創新生態系統如何影響採購、合規和研發合作選擇。

區域趨勢正在塑造籌資策略、監管重點和創新路徑，每個區域都有獨特的優勢和營運考量，這些因素都會影響供需模式。在美洲，精細化學品製造群和成熟的物流走廊為北美配方商和製藥生產商提供了接近性優勢。同時，監管重點在於電子可追溯性和環境合規性。在歐洲、中東和非洲地區（EMEA），法規結構和永續性要求通常要求供應商證明其合成方法對環境負責、擁有完善的廢棄物管理系統並進行生命週期評估。不同的管理體制也使得跨境供應需要謹慎考慮。亞太地區的特點是擁有專業的中間產品產能，並在電子製造和材料創新領域佔據重要地位，許多買家在成本競爭力強的採購與加強品管和長期供應商選擇投資之間尋求平衡。

檢驗技術服務能力、供應可靠性和永續發展措施如何決定特種化學品供應商和經銷商之間的競爭格局

1-萘硼酸價值鏈中的企業層面趨勢表明，技術能力、分析支援和一體化物流在競爭差異化中至關重要。主要企業和特種化學品經銷商通常會投資建立內部分析實驗室，以提供分析證書、雜質分析和分析方法轉移服務，從而加快客戶資格認證。化學品製造商與下游配方商之間的策略聯盟十分普遍，這使得雙方能夠共同開發特定應用等級的產品、擴大合成路線規模，並在最佳化試劑處理方面開展合作解決問題。

針對高階主管和技術領導者的具體建議：透過整合供應鏈和研發策略，增強韌性、確保品質並加速應用推廣。

產業領導者應優先採取一系列戰術性和策略舉措，將供應鏈洞察轉化為永續的商業性優勢。首先，應整合多元化採購策略，平衡區域生產基地與策略庫存中心。這有助於減少對單一供應來源的依賴，並減輕貿易措施和物流中斷的影響。此外，還應實施嚴格的供應商資格認證通訊協定，包括強制進行分析證書檢驗、現場和遠端審核，以及針對不合格批次採取雙方認可的糾正措施，以確保在應用敏感型環境中的一致性。

我們採用透明且可複製的調查方法，結合相關人員訪談、技術文獻綜合分析和供應商文件檢驗，以確保獲得可靠的洞見。

本分析的調查方法融合了對關鍵相關人員的訪談、技術文獻綜述和供應鏈圖譜分析，旨在全面了解營運和應用動態。關鍵資訊來源包括對來自製造和研發部門的採購經理、製程化學家和品質保證負責人進行結構化訪談，以獲取有關規格基準值、操作規範和供應商選擇標準的第一手資料。這些定性資訊與有機硼化學方面的技術文獻、化學品處理和運輸的法規指南以及公開的供應商文件進行交叉比對，以確保研究結果的事實依據和可重複性。

總之，我們提出了一個綜合觀點，即採購、技術能力和永續性的策略協調對於確保可靠的應用結果和商業性優勢至關重要。

總之，1-萘硼酸是合成化學和工業應用的核心成分，其規格控制、供應可靠性和技術支援決定商業性成敗。相關人員必須應對不斷變化的貿易環境、日益嚴格的永續性以及電子、材料、農業化學品和製藥行業不斷加快的應用需求。有效的應對措施取決於採購策略與籌資策略重點的一致性、對分析和配方服務的投資（以加快認證速度）以及建立包含可追溯性和緊急時應對計畫的供應商關係。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 1-萘硼酸市場依應用領域分類

  • 農業化學品中間體
    • 消毒劑
    • 除草劑
    • 殺蟲劑
  • 電子設備製造
    • 印刷基板製造
    • 半導體製造
  • 材料科學
    • 塗層
    • 光電
    • 聚合物添加劑
  • 醫藥中間體
    • 原料藥
    • 藥物發現研究

9. 1-萘硼酸市場依純度等級分類

  • 分析級
  • 試劑級
  • 技術級

10. 1-萘硼酸市場（依物理形態分類）

  • 顆粒狀
  • 粉末狀
  • 解決方案

第11章 1-萘硼酸市場（供應商類型分類）

  • OEM供應商
  • 一級供應商
  • 二級供應商

第12章 1-萘硼酸市場（按地區分類）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 1-萘硼酸市場（按組別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第14章 1-各國萘硼酸市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第15章美國1-萘硼酸市場

第16章 中國萘硼酸市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • ABCR GmbH & Co. KG
  • Beijing InnoChem Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.
  • Bide Pharmatech Ltd.
  • Frontier Scientific, Inc.
  • Hangzhou DayangChem Co., Ltd.
  • Key Organics Limited
  • Merck KGaA
  • Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-867BED9A9CFC

The 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market was valued at USD 154.84 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 169.78 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.65%, reaching USD 295.21 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 154.84 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 169.78 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 295.21 million
CAGR (%) 9.65%

An authoritative introduction that defines the compound's chemical identity, role in synthesis, handling imperatives, and cross-industry operational relevance

1-Naphthaleneboronic acid is an organoboron compound characterized by a naphthalene ring bonded to a boronic acid functional group, delivering reactivity that supports carbon-carbon bond formation and cross-coupling transformations. In synthetic chemistry it is prized for its compatibility with palladium-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions, enabling the efficient construction of biaryl architectures that are central to agrochemicals, active pharmaceutical agents, and advanced organic materials. The compound typically presents as a solid that can be formulated in powder or solution forms depending on handling and downstream processing needs.

From a handling and safety perspective, practitioners must be mindful of boronic acid propensity to form condensation products under certain conditions and the potential for dust inhalation when working with powder forms. Appropriate storage under controlled humidity, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to standard chemical hygiene practices mitigate these risks. Regulatory attention frequently centers on occupational exposure limits, transport classification, and waste-stream management, which in turn influence supplier documentation and customer requirements.

Operationally, 1-naphthaleneboronic acid occupies an important role at the intersection of research chemistry and industrial manufacture. It functions both as a discrete intermediate destined for end-user synthesis and as a building block within more complex value chains. As a result, stakeholders from procurement to process chemists and quality assurance teams must align on specifications, purity grades, and supply continuity to preserve batch-to-batch reproducibility and comply with formulation or regulatory constraints.

A strategic overview of how supply chain resilience, sustainability imperatives, and application-driven innovation are redefining sourcing and development strategies

The landscape for 1-naphthaleneboronic acid is shifting as supply chain resilience, sustainability, and advanced application demands converge to reshape sourcing and R&D priorities. On the supply side, procurement teams increasingly prioritize multi-sourced supplier networks and contractual terms that embed flexibility for purity grades and physical forms. Manufacturers and distributors are responding by diversifying production footprints, qualifying alternate feedstocks, and optimizing logistics to reduce lead-time sensitivity. These operational shifts are interlinked with an intensified focus on environmental, social, and governance practices, which are prompting incremental investment in greener synthesis routes and solvent recovery systems.

Concurrently, innovation at the application layer is accelerating adoption beyond traditional coupling roles into functional materials and device-level integrations. Advances in photonics and polymer additive chemistry are leveraging boronic acid derivatives to impart tunable electronic properties and enhanced interfacial compatibility. In the pharmaceutical and agrochemical arenas, the reagent retains a central role in enabling modular molecule construction, while drug discovery groups exploit its versatility in combinatorial and late-stage functionalization workflows.

Regulatory and trade dynamics are also reshaping decision-making. Increasing scrutiny over chemical supply chains has elevated the importance of transparent traceability and compliance documentation. As a result, companies are investing in supplier audits, analytical verification protocols, and data-driven quality assurance frameworks. Taken together, these trends point to a market environment that prizes adaptive sourcing, analytical rigor, and cross-functional collaboration to convert raw chemical capability into reliable commercial outcomes.

A focused analysis of how tariff measures have increased procurement complexity, accelerated supplier diversification, and prompted tactical operational responses across the value chain

The imposition of tariffs and trade measures has had material operational and strategic consequences for stakeholders involved in the production, distribution, and application of specialty organoboron chemicals. Increased duties on imported chemical intermediates have influenced supplier pricing models, elevated landed costs, and incentivized buyers to reassess total cost of ownership rather than relying solely on headline unit prices. These tariff-related pressures have amplified interest in diversifying supplier pools, nearshoring key feedstock processes, and securing long-term contracts with flex provisions to dampen volatility.

At the operational level, procurement cycles have lengthened as buyers build additional due diligence into sourcing decisions, seeking suppliers with robust customs classification practices and proven compliance track records. Logistics teams have faced higher administrative burdens to reconcile tariff codes and duties, while finance functions contend with margin compression when contractual pass-through is limited. These dynamics have also encouraged certain manufacturers to explore cost mitigation strategies such as consolidating shipments, modifying packaging to alter tariff treatment in compliance with regulations, and negotiating tariff-inclusive pricing structures.

For research and development groups, tariffs have sharpened attention on synthetic route optimization and reagent efficiency. Teams are prioritizing reactions that reduce reliance on high-cost intermediates or enable in-house generation of critical boron derivatives. In parallel, downstream formulators have started to evaluate substitution opportunities and rework process flows to maintain product performance while reducing exposure to incremental import costs. Collectively, the cumulative impact has elevated the strategic importance of trade-aware sourcing, analytic verification of supplier claims, and agility in reconfiguring supply lines when duties or trade measures evolve.

Comprehensive segmentation insights linking application demands, purity tiers, physical forms, and supplier hierarchy to specification, logistics, and compliance outcomes

Segmentation insights reveal how demand and supplier strategies vary according to application, purity, physical form, and supplier tier, with each axis shaping specification expectations, lead times, and qualification workflows. Based on Application, usage spans Agrochemical Intermediate, Electronic Manufacturing, Material Science, and Pharmaceutical Intermediate, where the Agrochemical Intermediate segment further subdivides into fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides that require precise impurity profiles and batch consistency to meet regulatory and field performance standards. The Electronic Manufacturing application is particularly sensitive to contaminants and is further studied across printed circuit board production and semiconductor manufacturing, both of which demand trace-metal control and process reproducibility. Material Science applications explore coatings, photonics, and polymer additives that rely on the compound's ability to impart electronic function, adhesion modulation, or optical tuning. The Pharmaceutical Intermediate application is assessed across active pharmaceutical ingredient production and drug discovery research, each with divergent purity tolerances and documentation needs.

Purity Grade segmentation shows distinct buyer behavior across analytical grade, reagent grade, and technical grade offerings: analytical grade supports high-precision characterization and impurity profiling; reagent grade aligns with synthetic chemistry use where well-defined reactivity is required; and technical grade supplies less stringent industrial processes. These differences influence sample lead times, certificate of analysis expectations, and acceptable tolerances in incoming inspection protocols. Physical Form segmentation - granular form, powder form, and solution form - affects handling, dosing accuracy, and shelf-life considerations; powder forms are common for bulk chemical synthesis while solution forms may be preferred for automated dosing in electronic or pharmaceutical manufacturing lines. Supplier Type segmentation into OEM suppliers, Tier 1 suppliers, and Tier 2 suppliers highlights the layered nature of the supply chain, where OEM suppliers maintain direct relationships with end-manufacturers and offer integrated quality and logistics services, Tier 1 suppliers provide consistent volumes with documented traceability, and Tier 2 suppliers often serve as regional or specialized providers with niche capabilities. Understanding the interplay of these segments enables more precise supplier qualification, specification negotiation, and inventory strategies that align technical requirements with operational realities.

A nuanced regional perspective on how geographic supply clusters, regulatory regimes, and innovation ecosystems influence sourcing, compliance, and R&D collaboration choices

Regional dynamics are shaping sourcing strategies, regulatory priorities, and innovation pathways, each region presenting distinct advantages and operational considerations that influence supply and demand patterns. In the Americas, manufacturing clusters for fine chemicals and established logistical corridors offer proximity benefits for North American formulators and pharmaceutical producers, while regulatory expectations emphasize electronic traceability and environmental compliance. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and sustainability mandates frequently drive suppliers to demonstrate greener synthesis approaches, robust waste management, and lifecycle assessments, and the region's diverse regulatory regimes require careful navigation for cross-border supply. The Asia-Pacific region is notable for its production capacity in specialty intermediates as well as its strong presence in electronics manufacturing and materials innovation, prompting many buyers to balance cost-competitive sourcing with heightened quality control and longer-term supplier qualification investments.

Across these regions, trade policies, infrastructure maturity, and local regulatory enforcement shape decisions about stock positioning, lead-time buffers, and redundancy. Companies operating globally often adopt hybrid sourcing strategies that combine regional production hubs with strategic inventory points to reduce exposure to localized disruptions. Research and development collaborations also exhibit geographic patterns: clusters of advanced materials research and semiconductor expertise influence where high-purity, application-specific formulations are developed and validated. These regional considerations feed directly into supplier selection criteria, risk assessments, and contingency planning frameworks, compelling procurement and R&D teams to align on regional priorities and qualification roadmaps.

An examination of how technical service capabilities, supply reliability, and sustainability commitments determine competitive positioning among specialty chemical suppliers and distributors

Company-level dynamics in the 1-naphthaleneboronic acid value chain demonstrate the importance of technical capability, analytical support, and integrated logistics in establishing competitive differentiation. Leading manufacturers and specialty chemical distributors typically invest in in-house analytical laboratories to furnish certificates of analysis, impurity profiling, and method transfer services that accelerate customer qualification. Strategic partnerships between chemical producers and downstream formulators are common, enabling co-development of application-specific grades and collaborative problem-solving when scaling synthetic routes or optimizing reagent handling.

Supply reliability is increasingly a differentiator; firms that offer comprehensive documentation, batch traceability, and consistent lead times command stronger long-term customer relationships. Companies pursuing vertical integration or strategic collaborations with catalyst and solvent providers often reduce operational friction and improve total process robustness for end-users. Additionally, several players have prioritized sustainability initiatives-such as reducing solvent usage, adopting catalytic process improvements, and implementing waste reduction programs-to meet buyer expectations and regulatory pressures. Market entrants and smaller niche suppliers frequently focus on agility, customized specifications, and responsive technical service to carve out positions alongside established producers. Taken together, competitive positioning in this space depends on a clear blend of technical service excellence, quality assurance rigor, and ability to adapt logistics models to customer risk tolerances.

Actionable recommendations for executives and technical leaders to enhance resilience, secure quality, and accelerate application adoption through integrated supply and R&D strategies

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of tactical and strategic initiatives to convert supply chain insight into durable commercial advantage. First, integrate multi-sourcing strategies that balance regional production footprints with strategic inventory hubs; doing so reduces reliance on single-origin suppliers and smooths exposure to trade measures or logistical disruptions. Complement this with rigorous supplier qualification protocols that mandate certificate of analysis verification, on-site or remote audits, and agreed remediation pathways for nonconforming batches to ensure consistency in application-sensitive environments.

Second, invest in analytical and formulation support capabilities. Providing rapid, application-specific analytical services and method transfer assistance reduces time-to-qualification for customers and strengthens partnerships. This also supports substitution risk mitigation by enabling technical teams to test alternative grades or physical forms with minimal disruption. Third, pursue process efficiency and greener synthesis initiatives to lower environmental footprints and align with customer sustainability requirements; demonstrating measurable improvements in solvent recovery, waste reduction, or energy use enhances commercial credibility and may simplify market access under tightening regulatory regimes.

Fourth, align commercial and legal contracting to incorporate tariff and trade contingencies, including flexible pricing mechanisms, Incoterm clarity, and logistics pass-through arrangements. Fifth, foster cross-functional collaboration between procurement, R&D, and quality assurance so that specification changes, regulatory updates, or supply events are managed holistically rather than in silos. Executing these recommendations will require prioritized investment, clear KPIs related to quality and supply continuity, and leadership commitment to embed resilience-minded practices into commercial and technical workflows.

A transparent, reproducible research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supplier documentation verification to ensure robust insights

The research approach underpinning this analysis synthesized primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain mapping to build a comprehensive understanding of operational and application dynamics. Primary inputs included structured interviews with procurement leads, process chemists, and quality assurance professionals across manufacturing and R&D organizations, enabling direct insights into specification thresholds, handling practices, and supplier selection criteria. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with technical literature on organoboron chemistry, regulatory guidance on chemical handling and transport, and publicly available supplier documentation to ensure factual grounding and reproducibility of the findings.

Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-verification of supplier capability claims against certificates of analysis and third-party testing where available, and by documenting assumptions and data limitations. The methodology emphasized reproducible audit trails for supplier attribution and focused on capturing operational impacts-such as lead times, analytical testing requirements, and specification differentials-rather than attempting to produce numerical market forecasts. Limitations of the study include variability in company confidentiality around contract terms and proprietary synthesis routes, which constrain the granularity of certain supplier practices. To mitigate these gaps, sensitivity-focused questioning and anonymized case examples were employed to reflect plausible operational behaviors without disclosing proprietary details.

A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the strategic imperative of aligning procurement, technical capability, and sustainability to secure reliable application outcomes and commercial advantage

In sum, 1-naphthaleneboronic acid occupies a strategic junction between synthetic chemistry and industrial application where specification control, supply reliability, and technical support determine commercial outcomes. Stakeholders must navigate evolving trade environments, tightening sustainability expectations, and accelerating application requirements in electronics, materials, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals. Effective responses hinge on aligning procurement strategy with R&D priorities, investing in analytical and formulation services that reduce time-to-qualification, and establishing supplier relationships that embed traceability and contingency planning.

Operational leaders should adopt an integrated approach that balances near-term tactics-such as diversifying suppliers and reinforcing contractual clarity around tariffs-with medium-term investments in process improvement and sustainability. By doing so, organizations can mitigate exposure to trade-related cost pressures, maintain product performance across application segments, and position themselves to capture opportunities as advanced materials and drug discovery applications continue to evolve. The overarching imperative is to treat the supply chain as a strategic asset: robust documentation, cross-functional cooperation, and technical agility are the levers that convert chemical capability into reliable commercial execution.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Application

  • 8.1. Agrochemical Intermediate
    • 8.1.1. Fungicides
    • 8.1.2. Herbicides
    • 8.1.3. Insecticides
  • 8.2. Electronic Manufacturing
    • 8.2.1. Printed Circuit Board Production
    • 8.2.2. Semiconductor Manufacturing
  • 8.3. Material Science
    • 8.3.1. Coatings
    • 8.3.2. Photonics
    • 8.3.3. Polymer Additives
  • 8.4. Pharmaceutical Intermediate
    • 8.4.1. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
    • 8.4.2. Drug Discovery Research

9. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Purity Grade

  • 9.1. Analytical Grade
  • 9.2. Reagent Grade
  • 9.3. Technical Grade

10. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Physical Form

  • 10.1. Granular Form
  • 10.2. Powder Form
  • 10.3. Solution Form

11. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Supplier Type

  • 11.1. OEM Suppliers
  • 11.2. Tier 1 Suppliers
  • 11.3. Tier 2 Suppliers

12. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market

16. China 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ABCR GmbH & Co. KG
  • 17.6. Beijing InnoChem Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.
  • 17.7. Bide Pharmatech Ltd.
  • 17.8. Frontier Scientific, Inc.
  • 17.9. Hangzhou DayangChem Co., Ltd.
  • 17.10. Key Organics Limited
  • 17.11. Merck KGaA
  • 17.12. Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp.
  • 17.13. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • 17.14. Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)