硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場（按電池類型、電池形式、容量等級、純度等級、製造流程、應用、最終用途和銷售管道）—全球預測（2026-2032 年）

2025年硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市值為1.4029億美元，預計2026年將成長至1.5784億美元，預計到2032年將達到3.2066億美元，複合年成長率為12.53%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025	1.4029億美元
預計年份：2026年	1.5784億美元
預測年份：2032年	3.2066億美元
複合年成長率 (%)	12.53%

本文簡要概述了硫化聚丙烯腈（SPAN）正極材料，為跨多個電池生態系統的技術、商業性和供應鏈考量奠定了基礎。

由於資源限制、性能需求和不斷發展的系統需求等多重因素，硫化聚丙烯腈（SPAN）正極材料已成為下一代電池架構極具潛力的替代方案。近年來，研究人員和製造商開發了多種合成方法，透過轉化化學實現高硫利用率，同時提高循環壽命並減少多硫化物穿梭效應，從而使其能夠實際應用於商業電池。產品開發人員正在尋求兼顧容量、安全性和與各種電解液體系兼容性的電極材料，而SPAN因其適用於鋰離子和鈉離子電池平台以及有望減少對稀有過渡金屬的依賴而脫穎而出。

近期技術突破和產業整合正在加速新型電極化學技術的商業化，並重塑供應鏈和採購趨勢。

電極材料領域正經歷著變革性的轉變，這些轉變正在重塑研究重點、製造策略和買家預期。聚合物化學和熱加工技術的進步拓展了導電基體中硫穩定化的方法，從而實現了能夠改善循環性能並減少穿梭效應的配方。同時，諸如電動車的高能量密度需求和固定式儲能系統的高能量處理能力等系統層面的需求，推動了能夠在寬溫度範圍和高倍率循環下可靠運行的電極材料的重要性。這些技術變革與更廣泛的行業趨勢相輔相成：電池化學體系的多樣化、對資源安全的日益重視，以及原始設備製造商 (OEM) 和電池組整合商願意評估能夠減少對稀缺原料依賴的替代化學技術。

評估關稅主導的政策變化對先進電極材料供應鏈、籌資策略和區域生產決策的累積影響

2025年實施的政策措施，包括關稅和監管調整，正在對先進電池材料的國際供應鏈、籌資策略和成本動態產生累積影響。雖然關稅只是影響採購選擇的眾多因素之一，但其存在正促使製造商重新評估其採購佈局，加快供應商多元化，並重新考慮關鍵上游投入品的近岸外包機會。硫化聚丙烯腈（SAPN）等正極材料依賴聚合物原料、硫源和專用加工設備，關稅的影響不僅體現在進口成本的直接增加上，也體現在物流、庫存管理實務和供應商合約條款等間接通路的變化。

透過綜合分析應用、化學成分、劑型、製造流程和分銷管道，確定首選的引入管道。

了解市場區隔的細微差別對於評估硫化聚丙烯腈在哪些領域能夠發揮最大的商業性價值至關重要。從應用角度來看，這種材料適用於消費性電子產品、電動車和能源儲存系統(ESS) 等各個領域。在消費性電子產品領域，筆記型電腦、智慧型手機和穿戴式裝置等特定裝置類別對形貌、能量密度和可靠性有著獨特的要求，這些要求會影響電極配方和加工流程的選擇。能源儲存系統也同樣多樣化。商業儲能應用優先考慮生命週期經濟性和耐用性，電網儲能強調在高累積吞吐量下實現長日曆壽命和安全性，而住宅儲能應用則需要在成本、循環壽命和易於整合之間取得平衡。每個應用細分領域對容量等級、純度等級和形貌相容性的重點各不相同。

區域策略趨勢和能力叢集將影響全球市場中的生產地點選擇、認證時間表和永續性。

區域動態對硫化聚丙烯腈電極材料的研發、生產和商業化管道的形成至關重要。在美洲，強大的創新叢集、眾多汽車原始設備製造商（OEM）的存在以及固定式儲能系統日益普及，正在刺激對高性能本土材料的需求。政策獎勵、基礎設施投資以及減少對海外供應鏈依賴的舉措，正在推動該地區對材料加工能力和中試規模生產的投資。該地區的行業相關人員往往優先考慮快速的認證週期和與現有電池組裝生態系統的整合，並且通常願意投資於在地採購，以確保生產的連續性並滿足監管要求。

製程專業化、垂直整合和協同檢驗如何塑造材料開發商、供應商和整合商的競爭差異化優勢

SPAN生態系統中的競爭格局反映了技術開發商、材料供應商、電池製造商和整合商等各方構成的複雜關係，這些各方共同定義了早期商業性環境。關鍵技術團隊致力於開發經濟可擴展、可重複的合成技術，同時維持能夠穩定硫含量的微觀結構特性。多家成熟的材料公司和Start-Ups正在投資建造中試生產線並檢驗生產控制策略，而與電池製造商的策略合作正在加速電極配方和電池組裝流程的回饋循環。

為製造商和整合商提供切實可行的策略步驟，以加速規模化生產、降低供應風險並最佳化面向重點終端用戶領域的產品系列

產業領導者應採取多管齊下的方法，將SPAN的技術潛力轉化為永續的商業性成果。首先，應優先投資於製程重複性和品管，包括增強隨線分析和完善批次追蹤，以降低大規模生產中的變異性。這將降低與原始設備製造商 (OEM) 的認證門檻，並透過減少對長期性能的不確定性來加速SPAN的普及應用。其次，應與電池製造商和系統整合商建立有針對性的夥伴關係，共同開發電極配方和檢驗通訊協定，從而縮短材料創新與系統級性能之間的反饋週期。

我們採用透明且可複製的研究途徑，結合一手訪談、技術檢驗和供應鏈分析，以支援穩健的策略建議。

本分析整合了一手和二手研究資料，對SPAN正極材料的現狀進行了嚴謹且可重複的評估。一手研究包括對材料科學家、電池工程師、採購經理和生產主管進行結構化訪談，並在條件允許的情況下進行工廠參觀和製程審核。這些一手研究深入分析了中試規模的挑戰、認證時間表和客戶驗收標準。二級資訊來源，包括同行評審的技術文獻、專利分析以及公開的監管和政策文件，用於檢驗技術論點並分析供應鏈趨勢。

技術能力整合、商業化限制、選擇性採用和策略成功因素共同驅動區域製造業趨勢

硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料處於實驗室創新與近期商業化機會之間的理想位置。該材料獨特的將硫固定在導電基質中的能力，克服了硫基正極材料的關鍵技術障礙之一，從而在不顯著影響循環壽命的前提下，提高了活性物質的利用率。儘管仍存在一些挑戰，例如如何擴大穩定生產流程的規模、確保純度控制以及在各種電池結構中驗證其長期可靠性。然而，工藝進步、策略夥伴關係以及不斷變化的採購策略的共同作用，預示著該材料在目標應用領域實現商業化的清晰路徑。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

• 研究設計
• 研究框架
• 市場規模預測
• 數據三角測量
• 調查結果
• 調查前提
• 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

• 首席主管觀點
• 市場規模和成長趨勢
• 2025年市佔率分析
• FPNV定位矩陣，2025
• 新的商機
• 下一代經營模式
• 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

• 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL 分析
• 市場展望
• 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

• 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
• 消費者體驗基準
• 機會地圖
• 分銷通路分析
• 價格趨勢分析
• 監理合規和標準框架
• ESG與永續性分析
• 中斷和風險情景
• 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章 人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章 依電池類型分類的硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 鋰離子
  • LFP
  • NCA
  • NMC
• 鈉離子

9. 依電池類型分類的聚丙烯腈硫化物正極材料市場

• 圓柱形
• 小袋
• 方塊

第10章 依容量等級分類的硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 高的
• 低的
• 中等的

第11章 依純度等級分類的硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 高純度
• 標準級

第12章 依製造流程分類的硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 化學氧化法
  • 乾式氧化
  • 濕式氧化
• 熱處理
  • 高溫
  • 低溫

第13章 聚丙烯腈硫化物正極材料市場（依應用領域分類）

• 家用電器
  • 筆記型電腦
  • 智慧型手機
  • 穿戴式裝置
• 電動車
• 能源儲存系統
  • 商業儲能
  • 電網儲能
  • 住宅儲能系統

14. 依最終用途分類的硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 車
  • 商用車輛
  • 搭乘用車
• 家用電器
  • 筆記型電腦
  • 智慧型手機
  • 穿戴式裝置
• 固定式儲能系統
  • 住宅
  • 公共產業

第15章 聚丙烯腈硫化物正極材料市場（依分銷管道分類）

• 售後市場
• 分配
  • 直接地
  • 間接
• OEM

第16章 硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場（按地區分類）

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 歐洲、中東和非洲
  • 歐洲
  • 中東
  • 非洲
• 亞太地區

第17章 硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場（依組別分類）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第18章：各國硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

• 美國
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英國
• 德國
• 法國
• 俄羅斯
• 義大利
• 西班牙
• 中國
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韓國

第16章美國硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

第17章：中國硫化聚丙烯腈正極材料市場

第21章 競爭情勢

• 市場集中度分析，2025年
  • 濃度比（CR）
  • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
• 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
• 2025年產品系列分析
• 基準分析，2025 年
• ADEKA Corporation
• Altmin
• BASF SE
• Johnson Matthey plc
• Lomon Billions Group Co., Ltd.
• POSCO Chemical Co., Ltd.
• SGL Carbon SE
• Shanghai Chemical Corporation
• Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC
• Solvay SA
• Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
• Targray International Inc.
• Toyota Jidoshokki Co., Ltd.
• Umicore NV/SA
• Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.

The Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market was valued at USD 140.29 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 157.84 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 12.53%, reaching USD 320.66 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 140.29 million
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 157.84 million
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 320.66 million
CAGR (%)	12.53%

A concise overview of sulfurized polyacrylonitrile positive electrodes that sets the stage for technical, commercial, and supply chain considerations across multiple battery ecosystems

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) positive electrode materials have emerged as a compelling alternative for next-generation battery architectures, driven by a combination of resource considerations, performance demands, and evolving system requirements. Over recent years, researchers and manufacturers have advanced synthesis routes that reconcile the high sulfur utilization of conversion-type chemistry with improved cycle life and reduced polysulfide shuttling, enabling more practical integration into commercial cells. As product developers seek electrode materials that balance capacity, safety, and compatibility with diverse electrolyte systems, SPAN stands out for its adaptability to both lithium-ion and sodium-ion platforms and for its potential to reduce reliance on scarce transition metals.

This report's introduction frames SPAN within the broader trajectory of battery material innovation, emphasizing its technical attributes, manufacturing pathways, and implications for multiple application segments. The material's architecture-where sulfur is chemically bonded within a carbonaceous matrix-offers intrinsic mitigation of soluble intermediate species and provides a pathway for stable cycling at high sulfur loadings. Accordingly, attention has turned to process scalability, purity control, and form-factor compatibility to meet the stringent requirements of consumer devices, electric vehicles, and grid-connected storage systems. By situating SPAN against incumbent cathode chemistries and emerging alternatives, the introduction clarifies the value proposition that underpins near-term adoption and longer-term research priorities.

Transitioning from laboratory-scale promise to industrial deployment requires a clear understanding of synthesis reproducibility, electrode formulation, and cell-level integration. The introduction outlines the critical technical checkpoints that developers must address, including reproducible binding of sulfur to polymer backbones, control over microstructure to minimize volume expansion, and compatibility with anode materials and separators. In addition, the introduction highlights how supply chain dynamics, regulatory environments, and evolving standards for cell safety converge to shape commercialization pathways. This sets the stage for the deeper analysis that follows, which examines market shifts, policy impacts, segmentation, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for stakeholders seeking to leverage SPAN technology effectively.

How recent technical breakthroughs and industrial realignments are accelerating commercialization of alternative electrode chemistries and reshaping supply chain and procurement dynamics

The landscape for electrode materials is undergoing transformative shifts that are reshaping research priorities, manufacturing strategies, and buyer expectations. Advances in polymer chemistry and thermal processing have expanded the toolkit for stabilizing sulfur within conductive matrices, enabling formulations that exhibit improved cyclability and mitigated shuttle effects. Meanwhile, system-level demands-driven by higher energy density requirements for electric vehicles and increasing energy throughput expectations for stationary storage-have elevated the importance of electrode materials that can operate reliably across a range of temperatures, C-rates, and duty cycles. These technical shifts coincide with broader industrial trends: a move toward diversified battery chemistries, intensified focus on resource security, and an increased willingness among OEMs and pack integrators to evaluate alternative chemistries that reduce exposure to constrained raw materials.

Concurrently, manufacturing and scale-up practices are evolving. Process forces are aligning behind scalable, lower-cost routes that maintain consistency in purity and microstructure. This includes refinements in chemical oxidation protocols and the optimization of thermal treatment regimens to achieve reproducible SPAN phases at larger throughput. The interplay between process control and cell-level formulation is critical; incremental improvements in binder selection, electrode calendaring, and electrolyte optimization can collectively unlock meaningful gains in cycle life and energy retention. In parallel, quality assurance frameworks and material characterization toolsets have matured, allowing developers to quantify impurity impacts and degradation pathways more precisely.

Policy and procurement trends are accelerating these changes. Buyers are increasingly requesting detailed provenance and lifecycle analyses for critical materials, and partnerships across the value chain are becoming more common to de-risk supply and align on qualification timelines. Research institutions and industrial players are collaborating on standardization efforts and joint pilot lines, reflecting a pragmatic recognition that commercialization of alternative positive electrode materials will require coordinated investment and shared learning. Together, these transformative shifts create a dynamic environment in which SPAN can transition from niche demonstrations to meaningful adoption where its technical and strategic advantages align with end-user priorities.

Assessing the cumulative ramifications of tariff-driven policy changes on supply chains, sourcing strategies, and regional production decisions for advanced electrode materials

Policy measures enacted in the United States in 2025 introduced tariffs and regulatory adjustments that have cumulative implications for international supply chains, sourcing strategies, and cost dynamics for advanced battery materials. While tariffs are only one lever among many that influence procurement choices, their presence has prompted manufacturers to reevaluate sourcing footprints, accelerate supplier diversification, and reconsider nearshoring opportunities for critical upstream inputs. For positive electrode materials like sulfurized polyacrylonitrile, which rely on polymer feedstocks, sulfur sources, and specialty processing equipment, tariff effects manifest both directly through increased import costs and indirectly through shifts in logistics, inventory practices, and supplier contractual terms.

In response, several manufacturers have adjusted commercial plans to minimize exposure to cross-border duties by qualifying domestic suppliers, establishing regional production hubs, or reconfiguring supply agreements to favor tariff-exempt product classifications where feasible. These adjustments often require capital investment, longer qualification timelines, and more integrated supplier management approaches. For companies with balanced portfolios across lithium-ion and sodium-ion programs, the policy environment has accelerated decision-making about where to concentrate in-house production versus outsourced manufacture. Moreover, where tariff measures intersect with export controls, firms have placed greater emphasis on dual-use component risk assessments to ensure compliance while maintaining operational continuity.

The cumulative effect of these shifts also extends to strategic partnerships and joint ventures. Entities along the value chain are exploring collaborative arrangements to share the burden of capital expenditures required for localized processing facilities and to co-develop qualification protocols that reduce duplication. In the short to medium term, procurement teams are adopting more rigorous scenario planning and hedging strategies to manage cost uncertainty. Over time, the policy-driven reshaping of supply networks is likely to influence which regions become centers of excellence for SPAN production and which firms emerge as preferred suppliers based on their ability to offer stable, compliant, and regionally aligned supply streams.

Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights that align application, chemistry, form factor, production process, and commercial channels to identify prioritized adoption pathways

A nuanced understanding of market segmentation is essential for evaluating where sulfurized polyacrylonitrile can deliver the greatest commercial impact. When viewed through the lens of application, the material is relevant across consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems. Within consumer electronics, specific device categories such as laptops, smartphones, and wearables impose distinct form-factor, energy density, and reliability requirements that influence electrode formulation and processing choices. Energy storage systems are similarly diverse; commercial storage use cases prioritize lifecycle economics and durability, grid storage emphasizes long calendar life and safety under high cumulative throughput, and residential storage balances cost with cycle life and ease of integration. Each of these application subsegments places different emphases on capacity grade, purity grade, and form factor compatibility.

Considering battery type segmentation reveals additional technical constraints and opportunities. The market spans lithium-ion and sodium-ion platforms, and within lithium-ion there are further distinctions among LFP, NCA, and NMC chemistries. Each chemistry has unique operating voltages, cathode-anode interactions, and electrolyte compatibility profiles, so SPAN formulations must be tuned for interfacial stability and cycle behavior specific to the host system. Thermal and electrochemical behavior will vary between sodium-ion and lithium-ion cells, and developers must carefully evaluate ionic radius effects, SEI formation tendencies, and electrolyte selection to ensure consistent performance across battery types.

Battery form factor segmentation-cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic-drives mechanical and processing constraints. Cylindrical cells often demand robust electrode winding and consistent electrode thickness control, while pouch cells require reliable lamination and sealing processes; prismatic cells emphasize stack compression and thermal management. End use segmentation further clarifies market priorities: automotive applications differentiate commercial vehicles from passenger vehicles with distinct duty cycles and safety margins; consumer electronics repeat the earlier distinctions across laptops, smartphones, and wearables; and stationary storage splits into residential and utility deployments that prioritize different trade-offs between cost per cycle, cycle life, and installation footprint.

Capacity grade and purity grade are critical determinants of target applications. High, medium, and low capacity grades map to device energy density expectations and influence electrode loading strategies, while high purity and standard grade classifications affect long-term stability and cross-compatibility with sensitive electrolyte systems. Sales channel segmentation-aftermarket, distribution, and OEM-shapes commercialization timelines and quality assurance expectations. Distribution itself can be direct or indirect, which affects lead times and contractual visibility. Finally, production process segmentation highlights the two primary routes: chemical oxidation and thermal treatment. Chemical oxidation can be executed via dry oxidation or wet oxidation approaches, each with its own environmental, throughput, and control implications. Thermal treatment can be managed under high-temperature or low-temperature regimes, where temperature profile and residency time dictate microstructural evolution and sulfur binding characteristics. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions provide a layered framework for prioritizing development efforts and tailoring go-to-market strategies to the most attractive application niches.

Regional strategic dynamics and capability clusters that influence production location choices, qualification timelines, and sustainability-driven procurement across global markets

Regional dynamics are pivotal in shaping the development, production, and commercialization pathways for sulfurized polyacrylonitrile electrode materials. In the Americas, robust innovation clusters, strong automotive OEM presence, and growing stationary storage deployments stimulate demand for high-performance, domestically sourced materials. Policy incentives, infrastructure investment, and an emphasis on reducing reliance on overseas supply chains have encouraged regional investments in material processing capabilities and pilot-scale manufacturing. Industry participants in this region tend to prioritize rapid qualification cycles and integration with existing battery assembly ecosystems, and they are often willing to invest in localized supply to secure continuity and meet regulatory expectations.

In Europe, the Middle East & Africa region, sustainability and circularity criteria are increasingly central to procurement decisions, and regulatory frameworks place emphasis on lifecycle assessment, recyclability, and responsible sourcing. Industrial policy in parts of Europe incentivizes low-carbon processing and vertical integration, which can favor production routes that minimize environmental footprint while delivering consistent material quality. The region's diverse industrial base and strong engineering capacity support collaborative demonstration projects, with utility-scale storage and passenger vehicle OEMs often at the forefront of adoption pathways. Meanwhile, parts of the Middle East are leveraging petrochemical strengths to explore feedstock synergies, and select African markets are emerging as potential suppliers of key commodity inputs where infrastructure investment allows.

Asia-Pacific remains a leading center for battery materials production, with deep supplier networks, mature processing expertise, and extensive manufacturing scale. The region's strengths include established supply chains for polymer precursors, sulfur derivatives, and electrode fabrication equipment, which can accelerate the ramp of SPAN production. In addition, a dense cluster of cell manufacturers and OEMs facilitates tight feedback loops between material developers and integrators, shortening qualification timelines and enabling rapid iteration. Conditional on regional policy choices and investment flows, Asia-Pacific economies are poised to remain central to the global SPAN supply base, though increasing attention to regional diversification and environmental compliance is influencing corporate location decisions. Across all regions, the interplay of local policy, industrial capability, and end-use demand will determine where production aligns with cost, speed-to-market, and sustainability objectives.

How process specialization, vertical integration, and collaborative validation are shaping competitive differentiation among material developers, suppliers, and integrators

Competitive positioning in the SPAN ecosystem reflects a mix of technology developers, materials suppliers, cell manufacturers, and integrators that are defining the early commercial landscape. Leading technology teams concentrate on delivering reproducible synthesis techniques that scale economically while preserving the microstructural features that enable stable sulfur confinement. Several established materials firms and startups are investing in pilot lines to validate production control strategies, and strategic collaborations with cell manufacturers accelerate feedback loops on electrode formulation and cell assembly processes.

Supply-side differentiation often hinges on mastery of a particular production pathway-whether optimized chemical oxidation protocols that deliver narrow impurity profiles or thermal treatment regimes that ensure consistent sulfur-polymer bonding. Firms that can offer tailored purity grades, reliable capacity grades, and form-factor-ready electrode sheets have a competitive advantage in qualifying with OEMs and tier-one integrators. In addition, companies that couple material supply with engineering support for cell conversion, safety testing, and regulatory alignment are positioned to capture higher value by shortening integration timelines for customers.

On the commercial front, firms that establish multi-region manufacturing footprints and resilient distribution channels enhance their attractiveness to customers seeking to mitigate tariff and logistics risks. Partnerships with academic institutions and national laboratories are also a common strategy to access advanced characterization capabilities and to accelerate technology validation. As the ecosystem matures, a subset of players is likely to specialize in high-purity grades for sensitive applications, while others focus on cost-optimized grades for stationary storage where lifecycle economics dominate. The competitive landscape will therefore be shaped by a combination of process excellence, vertical integration, strategic alliances, and the ability to meet rigorous quality and qualification requirements demanded by automotive and high-reliability electronics markets.

Actionable strategic steps for manufacturers and integrators to accelerate scale-up, de-risk supply, and tailor product portfolios for prioritized end-use segments

Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged set of actions to translate SPAN's technical promise into sustainable commercial outcomes. First, prioritize process reproducibility and quality control investments that reduce variability at scale, including enhanced inline analytics and robust batch tracing. This will lower qualification barriers with OEMs and accelerate adoption by reducing the uncertainty around long-term performance. Second, pursue targeted partnerships with cell manufacturers and system integrators to co-develop electrode formulations and validation protocols, thereby shortening the feedback loop between material innovation and system-level performance.

Third, align production geography with both demand centers and policy realities. Selective regionalization-establishing production capability where tariffs, logistics, and customer proximity deliver clear advantage-can mitigate exposure to trade-induced cost volatility. Fourth, tailor product portfolios to end-use segmentation; offer high-purity grades designed for demanding consumer electronics and automotive applications while maintaining cost-optimized variants for residential and utility-scale storage. Fifth, invest in lifecycle and safety characterization to meet evolving regulatory and procurement requirements, and proactively document environmental footprints and end-of-life pathways to address buyer concerns about circularity.

Finally, develop flexible commercialization models that include OEM supply agreements, distribution partnerships, and aftermarket channels to capture value at multiple points in the chain. Complement these commercial models with active engagement in standards and consortium efforts to shape qualification norms and to accelerate market acceptance. By combining technical rigor, strategic partnership, and adaptive commercialization tactics, industry leaders can position themselves to capture early opportunities and to scale responsibly as SPAN moves from pilot demonstrations into broader deployment.

A transparent and reproducible research approach combining primary interviews, technical validation, and supply chain analysis to support defensible strategic recommendations

This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research to produce a rigorous, reproducible assessment of the SPAN positive electrode landscape. Primary inputs include structured interviews with materials scientists, cell engineers, procurement leads, and manufacturing executives, as well as plant visits and process audits where accessible. These primary engagements provided insight into pilot-scale challenges, qualification timelines, and customer acceptance criteria. Secondary sources comprised peer-reviewed technical literature, patent analyses, and publicly available regulatory and policy documentation, all used to validate technical assertions and to contextualize supply chain dynamics.

Quantitative and qualitative methods were combined to triangulate findings. Technical performance claims were evaluated against reported laboratory and pilot data, with attention to cycle life test protocols, loading levels, and failure modes. Supply chain and policy analyses integrated trade data, tariff schedules, and announced investment flows to assess likely impacts on sourcing decisions. Competitive profiling employed an evidence-based approach grounded in public disclosures, patent filings, pilot announcements, and collaboration networks. Care was taken to exclude proprietary pricing or confidential customer data; instead, the methodology focuses on observable behaviors and verifiable technical metrics.

The report emphasizes transparency in assumption-setting and scenario framing. Where forward-looking implications are discussed, they are presented as conditional outcomes based on identifiable drivers such as regional policy shifts, process maturation, or changes in raw material availability. Sensitivity considerations are highlighted so readers can adapt conclusions to their own risk tolerances and operational contexts. Collectively, these methods ensure the analysis is defensible, actionable, and relevant to decision-makers considering technical, commercial, and regulatory pathways for SPAN adoption.

Synthesis of technical potential, commercialization constraints, and strategic success factors that will govern selective adoption and regional manufacturing dynamics

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile positive electrodes occupy a pragmatic position between laboratory innovation and near-term commercial opportunity. The material's intrinsic ability to immobilize sulfur within a conductive matrix addresses one of the primary technical hurdles for sulfur-based cathodes and offers a pathway to higher active material utilization without unduly compromising cycle life. While challenges remain-particularly in scaling consistent production processes, ensuring purity control, and demonstrating long-term reliability across diverse cell formats-the confluence of process advances, strategic partnerships, and evolving procurement priorities points to a credible path toward commercialization in targeted applications.

Adoption will be incremental and selective, concentrated where SPAN's attributes align with customer priorities for cost, safety, and material sourcing. Early commercial traction is most likely in applications where moderate to high capacity grades can be accommodated within established safety and lifecycle frameworks and where suppliers can deliver form-factor-compatible electrode products. The interplay of regional policy, tariff regimes, and manufacturing capacity will influence where scale-up occurs and which suppliers gain early advantage. Ultimately, success will depend on rigorous process control, close collaboration with cell manufacturers, and transparent demonstration of lifecycle and safety performance. For stakeholders who align product development, sourcing strategy, and partnership models with these requirements, SPAN represents a meaningful addition to the toolbox of cathode options that can contribute to diversified, resilient, and higher-performing battery systems.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Battery Type

• 8.1. Lithium Ion
  • 8.1.1. Lfp
  • 8.1.2. Nca
  • 8.1.3. Nmc
• 8.2. Sodium Ion

9. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Battery Form Factor

• 9.1. Cylindrical
• 9.2. Pouch
• 9.3. Prismatic

10. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Capacity Grade

• 10.1. High
• 10.2. Low
• 10.3. Medium

11. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Purity Grade

• 11.1. High Purity
• 11.2. Standard Grade

12. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Production Process

• 12.1. Chemical Oxidation
  • 12.1.1. Dry Oxidation
  • 12.1.2. Wet Oxidation
• 12.2. Thermal Treatment
  • 12.2.1. High Temperature
  • 12.2.2. Low Temperature

13. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Application

• 13.1. Consumer Electronics
  • 13.1.1. Laptops
  • 13.1.2. Smartphones
  • 13.1.3. Wearables
• 13.2. Electric Vehicle
• 13.3. Energy Storage Systems
  • 13.3.1. Commercial Storage
  • 13.3.2. Grid Storage
  • 13.3.3. Residential Storage

14. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by End Use

• 14.1. Automotive
  • 14.1.1. Commercial Vehicles
  • 14.1.2. Passenger Vehicles
• 14.2. Consumer Electronics
  • 14.2.1. Laptops
  • 14.2.2. Smartphones
  • 14.2.3. Wearables
• 14.3. Stationary Storage
  • 14.3.1. Residential
  • 14.3.2. Utility

15. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Sales Channel

• 15.1. Aftermarket
• 15.2. Distribution
  • 15.2.1. Direct Distribution
  • 15.2.2. Indirect Distribution
• 15.3. OEM

16. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Region

• 16.1. Americas
  • 16.1.1. North America
  • 16.1.2. Latin America
• 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 16.2.1. Europe
  • 16.2.2. Middle East
  • 16.2.3. Africa
• 16.3. Asia-Pacific

17. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Group

• 17.1. ASEAN
• 17.2. GCC
• 17.3. European Union
• 17.4. BRICS
• 17.5. G7
• 17.6. NATO

18. Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market, by Country

• 18.1. United States
• 18.2. Canada
• 18.3. Mexico
• 18.4. Brazil
• 18.5. United Kingdom
• 18.6. Germany
• 18.7. France
• 18.8. Russia
• 18.9. Italy
• 18.10. Spain
• 18.11. China
• 18.12. India
• 18.13. Japan
• 18.14. Australia
• 18.15. South Korea

19. United States Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market

20. China Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Positive Electrode Material Market

21. Competitive Landscape

• 21.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 21.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 21.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 21.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 21.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 21.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 21.5. ADEKA Corporation
• 21.6. Altmin
• 21.7. BASF SE
• 21.8. Johnson Matthey plc
• 21.9. Lomon Billions Group Co., Ltd.
• 21.10. POSCO Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 21.11. SGL Carbon SE
• 21.12. Shanghai Chemical Corporation
• 21.13. Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC
• 21.14. Solvay S.A.
• 21.15. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 21.16. Targray International Inc.
• 21.17. Toyota Jidoshokki Co., Ltd.
• 21.18. Umicore NV/SA
• 21.19. Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 11. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 12. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 13. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 14. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 15. UNITED STATES SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 16. CHINA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 2. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LFP, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LFP, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LFP, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NCA, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NCA, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NCA, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NMC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NMC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY NMC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM ION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM ION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM ION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDRICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDRICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDRICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY POUCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY POUCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY POUCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRISMATIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRISMATIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRISMATIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PURITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PURITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PURITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STANDARD GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STANDARD GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STANDARD GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY OXIDATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY OXIDATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY OXIDATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WET OXIDATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WET OXIDATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WET OXIDATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH TEMPERATURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH TEMPERATURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH TEMPERATURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW TEMPERATURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW TEMPERATURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LOW TEMPERATURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 90. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 91. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY GRID STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 92. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY GRID STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 93. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY GRID STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 94. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 95. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 96. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 97. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 98. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 99. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 100. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 101. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 102. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 103. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 104. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 105. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 106. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 107. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 108. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 109. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 110. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 111. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 112. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 113. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 114. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LAPTOPS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 115. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 116. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 117. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SMARTPHONES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 118. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 119. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 120. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY WEARABLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 121. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 122. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 123. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 124. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 125. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 126. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 127. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDENTIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 128. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY UTILITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 129. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY UTILITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 130. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY UTILITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 131. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 132. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 133. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 134. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 135. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 136. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 137. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 138. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 139. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 140. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 141. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 142. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY INDIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 143. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY INDIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 144. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY INDIRECT DISTRIBUTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 145. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 146. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 147. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 148. GLOBAL SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 149. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 150. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 151. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 152. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 153. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 154. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 155. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 156. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 157. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 158. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 159. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 160. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 161. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 162. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 163. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 164. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 165. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 166. AMERICAS SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 167. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 168. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 169. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 170. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 171. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 172. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 173. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 174. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 175. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 176. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 177. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 178. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 179. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 180. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 181. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 182. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 183. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 184. NORTH AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 185. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 186. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 187. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 188. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 189. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 190. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 191. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 192. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 193. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 194. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 195. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 196. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 197. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 198. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 199. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 200. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 201. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 202. LATIN AMERICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 203. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 204. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 205. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 206. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 207. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 208. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 209. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 210. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 211. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 212. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 213. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 214. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 215. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 216. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 217. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 218. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 219. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 220. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 221. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 222. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 223. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY LITHIUM ION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 224. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY BATTERY FORM FACTOR, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 225. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 226. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 227. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 228. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL OXIDATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 229. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL TREATMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 230. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 231. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 232. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 233. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 234. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 235. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 236. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL MARKET SIZE, BY STATIONARY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 237. EUROPE SULFURIZED POLYACRYLONITRILE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL