首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 醫療設備

病患監測

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1921083

血流動力學監測系統市場：全球市場規模，2025-2030年

Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market, Global, 2025-2030

出版日期: 2025年11月27日 | 出版商:

Frost & Sullivan | 英文 87 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

簡介目錄

本報告分析了北美、歐洲、亞太、拉丁美洲以及中東和非洲地區的侵入性、微創和非侵入性血流動力學監測解決方案，包括血流動力學監測設備、耗材和配件以及服務。本報告深入分析了市場規模、成長率、機會、策略挑戰、市場參與企業、新興技術和終端用戶。

全球血流動力學監測系統市場預計將從2024年的15億美元成長到2030年的19.9億美元，2025年至2030年的複合年成長率（CAGR）為4.8%。推動市場成長的主要因素包括微創和非侵入性監測技術的快速普及、心血管疾病盛行率的上升以及人工智慧驅動的臨床分析工具在重症監護環境中決策能力的提升。全球各地的醫院正在推動重症監護工作流程的現代化，擴展數位監測能力，並在手術室、急診科、加護病房和心臟監護室部署新一代系統，這一趨勢預計將在預測期內加速發展。

關鍵市場趨勢與洞察

2024年，北美在全球血流動力學監測系統市場中佔據最大佔有率，這得益於先進的醫院基礎設施、精密監測技術的廣泛應用以及臨床資訊學的強力整合。
亞太地區仍然是成長最快的區域市場，這主要得益於醫療保健支出的增加、心臟病負擔的加重，以及中國、印度和東南亞地區更容易獲得先進的監測解決方案。
隨著醫院逐步淘汰傳統的侵入性系統，以減少併發症、加快恢復速度並提高工作流程效率，對微創和非侵入性監測平台的需求持續成長。
人工智慧、穿戴式感測器和無線技術的融合，使得混合護理模式得以採用，其中包括即時分析、早期臨床干預、遠端監測和居家醫療計畫。
與電子健康記錄(EMR)、預測分析和臨床決策支援系統的整合正成為醫療系統尋求提高營運效率的關鍵採購標準。

市場規模及預測

2024年實際市場規模：15億美元
2030年市場規模預測：19.9億美元
2025-2030年複合年成長率：4.8%
最大市場（2024年）：北美
成長最快的市場：亞太地區

成長指標
成長要素
成長阻礙因素
預測考量
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按類型分類的收入預測
按地區分類的收入預測
收入預測分析
價格趨勢和預測分析
收益分成
收入佔有率分析
主要企業的產品映射
重大收購
血流動力學監測系統產業的主要趨勢
血流動力學監測概述
終端用戶趨勢
產品類型趨勢
類型概述
人工智慧/機器學習在血流動力學監測系統中的應用

成長引擎：北美

成長指標
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按收入預測類型
預測分析

成長引擎：歐洲

成長指標
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按收入預測類型
預測分析

成長引擎：亞太地區

成長指標
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按收入預測類型
預測分析

成長引擎：拉丁美洲

成長指標
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按收入預測類型
預測分析

成長引擎：中東和非洲

成長指標
收入預測
按產品分類的收入預測
按收入預測類型
預測分析

血流動力學監測系統的發展機遇

成長機會1：穿戴式設備
成長機會2：基於人工智慧的分析
成長機會 3：遠端監控

附錄：後續步驟

成長機會帶來的益處和影響
下一步
圖表清單
免責聲明

簡介目錄

Product Code: KBFE-54

Hemodynamic Monitoring is Experiencing Transformational Growth Due to Emerging Wearable, Non-Invasive, and AI-Enabled Solutions

The adoption of hemodynamic monitoring systems is growing in hospitals, driven by the development of advanced sensors for minimally invasive and noninvasive monitoring. Advancements in wearable and remote monitoring technologies are forecast to support adoption in out-of-hospital settings in the next decade. Vendors are increasingly investing in developing proprietary AI algorithms to enhance hemodynamic monitoring and gain a competitive advantage.

Acquisitions over the past decade have led to an improved ecosystem of monitoring solutions, with vendors such as BD, Getinge, ICU Medical, Baxter, and Masimo playing a key role in the hemodynamic monitoring market.

This Frost & Sullivan study analyzes invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring solutions. It covers hemodynamic monitoring devices, consumables and accessories, and services. Regional coverage covers North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East, and Africa. The study offers valuable insights into market size, growth rates, opportunities, strategic imperatives, notable market participants, new technologies, and end users. The study period spans 2022 to 2030, with 2024 as the base year and 2025 to 2030 as the forecast.

Report Summary: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

The global hemodynamic monitoring systems market reached a value of USD 1.50 billion in 2024 and is projected to rise to USD 1.99 billion by 2030, expanding at a CAGR of 4.8% from 2025 to 2030. Growth is supported by the rapid adoption of minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring technologies, rising cardiovascular disease prevalence, and the increasing use of AI-enabled clinical analytics that enhance decision-making in high-acuity environments. Hospitals worldwide are modernizing critical care workflows, expanding digital monitoring capabilities, and deploying next-generation systems across operating rooms (ORs), emergency departments (EDs), intensive care units (ICUs), and cardiac care units-a trend expected to accelerate throughout the forecast period.

Key Market Trends & Insights

North America accounted for the largest share of the global hemodynamic monitoring systems market in 2024, driven by advanced hospital infrastructure, high adoption of precision monitoring technologies, and strong integration of clinical informatics.
Asia-Pacific remains the fastest-growing regional market, supported by rising healthcare expenditure, increasing cardiac disease burden, and broader access to high-acuity monitoring solutions in China, India, and Southeast Asia.
Demand for minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring platforms continues to rise, as hospitals shift away from traditional invasive systems to reduce complications, shorten recovery times, and improve workflow efficiency.
The convergence of AI, wearable sensors, and wireless technologies is enabling real-time analytics, earlier clinical intervention, and adoption of hybrid care models, including remote monitoring and hospital-at-home programs.
Integration with electronic medical records (EMR), predictive analytics, and clinical decision-support systems is becoming a major purchasing criterion for health systems seeking improved operational efficiency.

Market Size & Forecast

2024 Market Size: USD 1.50 Billion
2030 Projected Market Size: USD 1.99 Billion
CAGR (2025-2030): 4.8%
Largest Market (2024): North America
Fastest-Growing Market: Asia-Pacific

Market Growth Context

Demand for hemodynamic monitoring is rising globally as hospitals prioritize precision cardiovascular care, earlier clinical intervention, and workflow efficiency. The growing burden of cardiac diseases-such as heart failure, sepsis, and arrhythmias-is driving wider adoption of minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring systems across ICUs, operating rooms, and emergency departments.

The market is also benefiting from advances in AI-enabled analytics, wireless sensors, and portable monitoring platforms, which support real-time decision-making and enable emerging care models like remote monitoring and hospital-at-home programs. Leading vendors continue to innovate with smarter, interoperable devices, reinforcing hemodynamic monitoring as an essential component of modern acute and chronic care delivery.

Market Overview & Trends: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

The hemodynamic monitoring devices market is undergoing a structural transformation fueled by advancements in device design, sensing technology, data analytics, and the shift toward precision medicine. Hospitals facing financial and workforce pressures are demanding solutions that deliver real-time insights, automate clinical decisions, and reduce preventable deterioration events. This has accelerated the uptake of non-invasive and minimally invasive platforms that reduce procedural risk while maintaining clinical accuracy. The PDF identifies disruptive technologies such as wearable sensors, AI-augmented decision-support platforms, and wireless systems as primary forces redefining market competition

AI is among the most influential technology trends. Vendors are integrating predictive analytics capable of identifying hypotension, analyzing stroke volume variation, and interpreting multi-parameter hemodynamic profiles. BD's HemoSphere Alta platform, Retia Medical's multi-beat analysis (MBA), GE Healthcare's AI.i platform, and Masimo's PulseCO algorithm illustrate how AI integration is enhancing monitoring precision and clinical workflow efficiency

These innovations enable a transition from reactive to proactive care by supporting early detection of hemodynamic instability.

Non-invasive and minimally invasive devices are increasingly preferred due to lower infection risks and suitability for fast-growing care environments such as ambulatory surgical centers and out-of-hospital care. Finger-cuff technologies, photoplethysmography-based solutions, bioreactance, and esophageal Doppler systems are gaining attention, especially as hospitals emphasize patient comfort and reduced procedural burden.

The market is also shaped by demographic pressures, with cardiovascular diseases remaining the leading global cause of mortality. Aging populations in Europe, Japan, China, and North America continue to expand demand for high-acuity monitoring solutions. Asia-Pacific's position as the fastest-growing region is attributed to accelerating healthcare investments, improved critical care capacity, and a growing cluster of local manufacturers in China, Japan, and India producing technologically capable yet cost-accessible systems

On the commercial front, acquisitions are reshaping market leadership. BD's acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences' critical care business, Masimo's acquisition of LiDCO, and Baxter's acquisitions to strengthen non-invasive portfolios demonstrate strategic expansion. Across the ecosystem, hospitals increasingly favor integrated monitoring platforms with analytics, connectivity, and remote monitoring capability-establishing a new competitive baseline in the hemodynamic monitoring systems market.

Revenue & Spending Forecast: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

The global hemodynamic monitoring systems market is set for sustained expansion throughout the forecast period. According to the PDF, market revenue increased from USD 1,500.7 million in 2024 to a projected USD 1,989.7 million by 2030, representing a CAGR of 4.8% during 2025-2030

Growth is driven by accelerated adoption of non-invasive and minimally invasive technologies, advancements in AI-driven analytics, and the rising burden of cardiovascular diseases globally.

This revenue trajectory indicates continued strengthening of the hemodynamic monitoring devices market, supported by innovation, expanding clinical use cases, and a transition toward precision cardiovascular care.

Scope of Analysis: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

This assessment covers the global Hemodynamic monitoring market across devices, consumables, and services, evaluating their demand patterns across intensive care units, emergency care, operating rooms, catheterization labs, ambulatory surgical centers, and home/remote care settings. The study period spans 2022-2030, with 2024 as the base year and 2025-2030 as the forecast window

Products included in the scope are invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring devices as well as accessories such as sensors, catheters, cuffs, and disposable components used for continuous cardiovascular monitoring. The analysis also covers services linked to system maintenance, software integration, and subscription offerings. Regional coverage is comprehensive, covering North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa, derived from both primary interviews and secondary validation using filings, regulatory data, and vendor disclosures.

The PDF emphasizes analysis of trends shaping the hemodynamic monitoring devices market, including the expansion of multiparameter integration, with many vendors incorporating hemodynamic modules into broader patient monitoring ecosystems. However, multiparameter monitors themselves are excluded from the market sizing to maintain clarity in revenue attribution.

The methodology incorporates macroeconomic factors such as healthcare inflation, tariff impact, GDP growth variations, and regulatory frameworks-including 2025 FDA guidance on AI-enabled devices-all of which influence innovation, pricing, and adoption of advanced hemodynamic solutions

This structured analytical scope supports a reliable forecast and competitive interpretation.

Market Segmentation Analysis: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

By Product

The hemodynamic monitoring devices market is segmented into devices, consumables & accessories, and services.

Devices form the highest-value segment driven by AI integration, new non-invasive platforms, wireless systems, and enhanced user interfaces.
Consumables & accessories represent the key recurring revenue engine, propelled by the need for disposable sensors, cuffs, and catheters. Their high volume makes them essential to hospital expenditure models.
Services-including maintenance, data analytics, and subscription platforms-are increasingly bundled with device purchases, supporting long-term vendor relationships.

By Type

The market includes invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive monitoring technologies:

Invasive monitoring (pulmonary artery catheters, arterial lines) remains essential in high-acuity ICU and surgical settings requiring precise cardiac output and pressure measurement.
Minimally invasive solutions balance accuracy and safety, appealing to hospitals seeking reduced complication risks.
Non-invasive systems-bioimpedance, bioreactance, finger-cuff BP sensors, esophageal Doppler, photoplethysmography-are the fastest-growing, driven by patient comfort and use in outpatient and home-care settings.

By Region

North America holds the largest revenue base due to extensive vendor presence, adoption of advanced platforms, and reimbursement support.
Europe demonstrates steady growth driven by aging populations, increased surgical volumes, and early adoption of minimally invasive tools.
Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region, supported by rising hospital capacity, affordability enhancements, and increasing prevalence of cardiac diseases.
LATAM & MEA show moderate growth with adoption constraints linked to cost pressures and limited availability of dedicated hemodynamic technologies, often relying on multiparameter monitors.

Overall, segmentation highlights strong global momentum toward non-invasive and AI-supported solutions, reshaping competitive dynamics within the Hemodynamic monitoring devices market.

Growth Drivers: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

Key growth drivers identified in the PDF include the rapid development of advanced sensors and non-invasive, minimally invasive, and wearable hemodynamic technologies. These innovations significantly improve patient safety and comfort while expanding applicability into outpatient and remote monitoring environments. AI-powered platforms capable of predictive analytics, early deterioration detection, and workflow optimization are further accelerating adoption, especially in high-acuity settings where timely clinical decisions are crucial

Personalized cardiovascular care is another major driver. Clinicians increasingly prefer data-rich hemodynamic insights for fluid management, vasoactive drug titration, and intervention planning. The Hemodynamic monitoring devices market supports this shift by generating continuous, high-resolution cardiac output, blood pressure, and perfusion parameters needed for individualized therapy.

The rising global incidence of cardiovascular disorders-heart failure, myocardial infarction, shock, hypertension-combined with aging populations, is expanding the patient pool requiring hemodynamic monitoring across ICUs, emergency departments, and surgical theaters. Growth in remote monitoring and home-care adoption also supports demand for non-invasive and wearable solutions.

Vendor initiatives-including product innovation, awareness programs, AI integration, and clinical-validation efforts-collectively strengthen growth prospects. Overall, these drivers position the Hemodynamic monitoring market for stable medium-term growth.

Growth Restraints: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

Despite positive growth, several challenges limit full-scale adoption of advanced hemodynamic systems. High device and consumable costs impose financial pressure on hospitals, especially in low- and middle-income economies where budgets remain constrained. The PDF highlights cost concerns as a high-severity barrier over the next 5-6 years

Limited awareness and insufficient clinician training further affect adoption of minimally invasive and non-invasive technologies in emerging markets. In addition, evidence gaps concerning the accuracy and clinical effectiveness of some non-invasive systems in critically ill patients reduce confidence among intensivists and surgeons.

Implementation barriers also arise from infrastructure constraints. Many hospitals in developing regions lack advanced IT systems required to integrate AI-driven and analytics-enabled monitoring platforms. Tariff-related cost increases on imported devices additionally strain supply availability and pricing stability.

These challenges collectively restrain the full potential of the hemodynamic monitoring devices market, creating a slower adoption curve in certain geographies despite technological advancements.

Competitive Landscape: Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market

The competitive environment in the hemodynamic monitoring systems market is moderately concentrated, with the top five vendors accounting for 57.8% of global revenue in 2024

Leading participants include BD, ICU Medical, Getinge, Baxter, and Masimo, each offering differentiated portfolios across invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive modalities.

BD emerged as a dominant competitor following its 2024 acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences' critical care unit. The enhanced HemoSphere Alta platform integrates predictive algorithms and advanced analytics for actionable clinical decision-making.

ICU Medical maintains strength through its Cogent platform supporting dual-mode (minimally invasive + invasive) monitoring.

Baxter leads the non-invasive segment through bioreactance-based Starling systems, enabling personalized fluid management.

Masimo strengthened its position through the LiDCO acquisition, adding PulseCO algorithm-driven analytics.

Getinge continues innovation with its PiCCO, PulsioFlex, and the newly introduced Pulsiocare system.

Other relevant companies-Philips, GE Healthcare, Mindray, Fysicon (Canon), Retia Medical, Deltex Medical, Uscom, Osypka Medical, and Nihon Kohden-expand competitive diversity across geographies, with several focusing on specialized non-invasive or AI-driven solutions.

The market is also shaped by continuous M&A activity. Key acquisitions-BD-Edwards (2024), ICU Medical-Smiths Medical (2022), Masimo-LiDCO (2021), and Baxter-toSense (2020)-have accelerated portfolio consolidation and technological advancement.

Overall, competitive strategies center on AI integration, improved usability, wearable platforms, and expansion into remote monitoring-further intensifying competition in the global hemodynamic monitoring devices market.

Research Scope

Scope of Analysis
Segmentation

Growth Environment: Transformation in Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems

Why is it Increasingly Difficult to Grow?
The Strategic Imperative 8™
The Impact of the Top 3 Strategic Imperatives on the Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Industry