查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場 - 全球和區域分析：新興企業、政策框架和國家 - 分析和預測（2025-2035）
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1744396

農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場 - 全球和區域分析：新興企業、政策框架和國家 - 分析和預測（2025-2035）

Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Emerging Startups, Policy Framework, and Country-wise Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2025-2035
出版日期: | 出版商: BIS Research | 英文 149 Pages | 商品交期: 1-5個工作天內

價格

農業、林業和土地利用的碳權額度市場規模龐大，將吸收大氣中二氧化碳或避免溫室氣體排放的農場實踐收益，將覆蓋作物、減少耕作、農林業和泥炭地恢復等再生技術轉化為可交易的環境資產。

在這個自願性市場領域，每個信用額度代表透過農業活動消除或避免的一公噸二氧化碳當量，這些活動須經嚴格的框架檢驗，例如 Verra 的 VCS、黃金標準氣候與農業方法，或歐盟的碳去除與低碳農業 (CRCF) 法規。透過將私人資本引入土壤健康和土地利用創新，該市場為農民提供了新的收入來源，並透過可擴展的基於自然的解決方案增強了全球氣候減緩努力。

主要市場統計數據
預測期 2025-2035
2025年的估值 88億美元
2035年預測 670.7億美元
複合年成長率 22.51%

市場介紹

截至2024年，農業碳權額度約佔農業、林業和其他土地利用（AFOLU）市場2.16億噸二氧化碳當量中的1億噸二氧化碳當量，平均價格為4-6美元/噸二氧化碳當量，比林業溢價低近15%。大型食品和農業綜合相關企業（例如拜耳旗下的ForGround、Indigo Ag和Nutrien）已在北美和歐洲招募了3000多家生產商，並正在使用基於衛星的監測、報告和檢驗（MRV）工具來簡化計劃檢驗。儘管勢頭強勁，但由於方法論的碎片化以及投資者對永久性和額外性的謹慎，信用額度仍然受到限制，農業在AFOLU總發行量中的佔有率仍約為30%。

未來十年，在歐盟自願性CRCF認證以及美國根據《通膨削減法案》預期推出的「碳農業」獎勵等強勁政策驅動下，預計到2035年，農業信貸的年度發放量將加倍，達到2億噸二氧化碳當量以上。數位化MRV發展（例如基於無人機的土壤碳測繪、基於區塊鏈的註冊系統以及基於人工智慧的排放模型）預計將計劃開發成本降低20-30%，並鼓勵小農戶和特色作物生產者的參與。同時，快速消費品、零售、金融服務和其他公司已準備好將農場信貸納入綜合保護組合。

對產業的影響

蓬勃發展的碳權市場正迫使相關企業企業集團和投入品供應商重新調整其投資組合。科迪華農業科技和 Nutrien 等領先的種子和肥料製造商目前正在將大量研發預算分配給符合土壤碳通訊協定的碳智慧產品（例如，犁地種子披衣、營養高效接種劑）。這種轉變不僅開闢了新的服務線，還使農民能夠從種子包衣和微生物生物刺激素中每公頃獲得 15-25 美元的預付款，從而對沖收益流免受商品價格波動的影響。作為回應，私募股權基金正在企業聯合組織交易，將土壤碳實踐與精密農業感測器捆綁在一起，承保「設備即服務」契約，以同時提供農業和碳成果。

農場營運正在系統地重新設計，以最佳化碳封存並實現產量目標。約翰迪爾和愛科等設備OEM正在推出支援遙測的帶式施肥機和高地隙氣播設備，可減少高達 80% 的土壤擾動。這些機器直接與碳量化平台（例如 Carbonview 專案）整合，可自動向檢驗記錄減少耕作路徑和殘留物覆蓋度的指標。透過將碳權合格作為原生功能，營運商可以簡化第三方審核，將檢驗時間從 90 天縮短至 30 天以內，每英畝增加 10-15 美元的收益，並有效降低精密設備的盈虧平衡成本 8-12%。

穀物經銷商、乙醇生產商和食品加工商擴大將承購合約與檢驗的碳屬性掛鉤。 CHS 和阿徹丹尼爾斯米德蘭公司 (ADM) 等大型合作社已設立碳差異化基差溢價，向農民支付每蒲式耳 0.50-1.00 美元的額外費用，用於交付持有監管鏈 (CoC) 碳證書的玉米。為了增強可追溯性，這些買家正在整合 Xpansiv 和 Persefoni 等供應商提供的區塊鏈帳本，以便即時核對登記記錄的燒錄情況和穀物實際產量。此類框架降低了重複計算的風險，並允許加工商向終端市場報告碳中和產品。

從農化巨頭到跨國糧食貿易商等行業相關人員一直在利用碳權組合作為對沖新合規制度和邊境調整措施的策略性對沖。例如，歐盟提案的碳邊境調整機制 (CBAM) 將獎勵歐盟以外的大豆和玉米出口商將其內嵌排放內部化，碳權的有效估值高達 33.96 美元/噸二氧化碳。擁有成熟 AFOLU 信用管道的公司可以透過自願信用註銷來抵消潛在的 CBAM 負債，從而平滑關稅風險。同時，保險公司正在提供客製化的「碳績效」承保，透過降低 10-15% 的檢驗碳匯農場的保費，將碳權的經濟性進一步嵌入行業風險模型中。

市場區隔

細分一：按應用

  • 拆除計劃
  • 迴避計劃
  • 組合計劃

清除計劃領域主導全球農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場（按應用）

以清除為重點的努力已迅速成為農業、林業和土地利用領域碳權市場的前沿，因為它們將碳無限期地鎖定在土壤和生質能中，而不是簡單地避免未來的排放。深根覆蓋作物、生物炭土壤改良劑和綜合農林業等技術不僅可以封存二氧化碳，還可以提高土壤肥力、產量穩定性和生態系統多樣性。高解析度衛星影像和人工智慧土壤碳模型的出現降低了 MRV 成本和審核時間。隨著歐盟碳清除和碳農業條例等監管制度擴大獎勵真正的清除，以清除為重點的計劃可能會佔 AFOLU 信用需求的很大一部分。

細分2：按計劃類型

  • 林業和土地利用
    • REDD+計劃
    • ARR
    • IFM
  • 農業

預計林業部門將在 2024 年至 2035 年期間超過其他 AFOLU 部門，因為林業部門每公頃具有很高的碳儲存潛力、成熟的測量方法以及企業淨零計畫的強勁需求。遙感探測的最新改進已將檢驗成本降低了 30%，使大規模重新造林和改善森林管理計劃更具有融資可行性。同時，歐盟的碳去除和碳農場 (CRCF) 規則等監管順風明確優先考慮人工林等長壽命、基於自然的去除，從而推動了溢價（比 VCM 平均值高出 15%）以及與主要工業排放的長期承購協議。此外，林業計劃提供的協同效益（生物多樣性、流域保護、社區生計）與不斷發展的 ESG 指令一致，進一步鞏固了林業在農業和土地使用自願碳權市場中的主導成長軌跡。

細分3：按地區

  • 北美—美國、加拿大、墨西哥
  • 歐洲
  • 亞太地區－中國、日本、韓國、印度及世界其他地區
  • 世界其他地區 – 巴西、南非等。

2024年，亞太地區引領農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場，這得益於大規模農業的融合、中國、日本和韓國雄心勃勃的企業淨零目標以及政府「低碳農業」獎勵的迅速擴大。在中國，農業農村部的農業補貼改革將補貼與土壤碳封存試點掛鉤，釋放了數億美元的計劃投資。在基準排放更高、封存潛力更大的新興市場，具有成本競爭力的產量推動AFOLU信用額度發放與前一年同期比較增38%，而數位化MRV平台將檢驗週期從數月縮短至數週，進一步加快了部署速度。這些因素使亞太地區成為成長最快的地區，在數量和價值成長方面均超過北美和歐洲。

全球農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場的最新趨勢

  • 2025年4月，全球土壤碳市場領導者Boomitra與第一家獲得認可的、以完全誠信的方式發放碳權額、並充分整合自然生態系統和社會影響的碳認證機構社會碳基金會宣布透過Boomitra URVARA計劃首次發放土壤有機碳（SOC）去除信用額，標誌著全球農業碳權額市場取得一系列重要里程碑。
  • 2025年3月，專注於再生農業和碳農業技術的農業技術新興企業Grow Indigo從英國發展金融機構英國國際投資公司（BII）獲得1000萬美元融資。資金籌措旨在擴大Start-Ups的永續性舉措（該計劃已涵蓋印度七個邦的250萬英畝農地），並加速其碳權計劃，使小農戶受益。
  • 2024年10月，拜耳、GenZero（金融巨頭淡馬錫的全資子公司）、殼牌和三菱商事這四家全球巨頭決定在九個州擴展其碳權額度計劃，以賦能農民。該計劃將透過採用智慧農業、交替灌溉和旱作農業（AWD）以及直播水稻（DSR）等技術來產生信用額度。這些信用額度將進行交易，幫助農民賺取額外收入。該聯盟計劃擴大該計劃的涵蓋範圍積，包括增加近8500公頃，簡化稻田溫室氣體（GHG）排放的科學測量，並加強對農民的援助和支持系統。該計劃還計劃在實施前兩年累積的經驗基礎上，進一步考慮擴大規模。

需求——促進因素與限制因素

市場需求驅動：2050年達成淨零碳排放目標

企業 2050 年淨零排放承諾正推動對高完整性農業、林業和土地利用 (AFOLU) 信用額度的需求激增。聯合利華的大部分排放依賴農業供應鏈，自 2015 年以來，該公司已將排放直接和能源採購排放減少了 70% 以上，併計劃最早在 2030 年將剩餘排放減少到零。為了縮小內部減排和絕對中和之間的差距，該公司正在從拉丁美洲和東南亞的計劃進行多年期土壤碳和林業信用額度購買。在 2020 年實現營運中和後，蘋果承諾到 2030 年實現全價值鏈中和，其恢復基金將在巴西和巴拉圭部署約 2.8 億美元用於保護和重新造林計劃，特別針對持久性砍伐。在獲得「基於科學的目標」舉措的核准後，奢侈品集團開雲集團承諾到2030年將其範圍一和範圍二的排放在2015年的基礎上減少90%，並透過採購基於自然的信用額度來實現這一目標。英格卡集團（IKEA）同樣計劃在2030年將其價值鏈排放減半，並承諾大量收購AFOLU信用額度以抵銷剩餘排放。這些緊迫的淨零排放藍圖有效地將企業永續性承諾轉化為對AFOLU碳計劃的現實需求，刺激了市場成長並為計劃融資提供了支撐。

市場限制：土地所有權的不確定性和登記延遲

土地所有權的不確定性和登記延遲削弱了農業、林業和土地利用計劃獲得碳權發放的基本合格。領先的登記開發通訊協定，例如 Verra 的 VM0042（用於改善農業土地管理），要求計劃提案透過永久業權、長期租賃或在國家土地管理局登記的同等合法所有權，證明其對土地擁有明確的、法律認可的權利。然而，在非洲和拉丁美洲的許多地方，傳統所擁有土地製度與法律制度共存，導致正式所有權持有不明確。計劃開發商通常要花 6 到 12 個月甚至更長的時間簽署租約並協商所有權澄清，然後才申請登記。這個漫長的預登記階段會延遲信用額度的發放並增加交易成本，降低計劃內部報酬率並抑制依賴精簡入職流程的小農聚集模式。

區塊鏈通證化正在徹底改變農業、林業和土地利用碳權額的獲取方式，將傳統上流動性差且被綁定在註冊中心的抵消額轉化為可程式設計的數位資產，這些數位資產可以在公開市場上全天候交易。透過通證化，每個碳權（原本以註冊中心管理的證書形式發放）都被「橋接」到區塊鏈網路上，並被鑄造為可認證或不可認證的通證。這個流程允許部分所有權、鏈上贖回、即時來源證明，並且智慧合約可以自動遵守註冊中心的規則和贖回通訊協定。因此，市場參與企業可以進行小批量交易，直接從零售錢包參與排碳權市場，並透過公共帳本即時驗證退役狀態。透過降低最低交易規模並避免繁瑣的雙邊談判，通證化將碳市場開放給更廣泛的私人投資者、個人、家族辦公室和小型企業買家，同時保持註冊中心所要求的高誠信標準。

產品/創新策略：產品類型幫助讀者了解農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場的各種產品和應用。此外，它還提供了按應用（清除計劃、規避計劃、組合計劃）和產品類型（林業和土地利用（包括REDD+、ARR、IFM）以及農業）對農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場進行詳細解讀的機會。

成長/行銷策略：農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場正在見證主要企業的重大發展，包括業務擴張、聯盟、合作和合資企業。各公司首選的策略是夥伴關係、達成協議和擴張，以加強其在農業碳權市場的地位。例如，2024 年 8 月，聯合國糧食及農業組織 (FAO) 和國家農業和農村發展銀行 (NABARD) 在孟買舉行了一次高級別會議，以建立夥伴關係並加强两機構之間的合作。這次會議標誌著印度在開發碳基金、加強農民生產者組織 (FPO) 和促進永續農業系統方面的合作邁出了重要一步。

競爭策略：本研究分析並概述了農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場的主要企業，包括為各種用途提供碳權的主要參與者。此外，夥伴關係、協議和聯盟等全面的競爭策略有助於讀者了解市場中尚未開發的收益來源。

主要市場參與企業及競爭格局

農業、林業和土地使用碳權市場中介紹的公司是根據廣泛的二手資料研究選出的，其中包括公司範圍分析、產品系列分析、市場滲透以及從主要專家那裡收集到的見解。

農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場既有對市場有透徹了解並已確立自身地位的主要企業，也有尋求在這個競爭激烈的市場中站穩腳跟的新興企業。 2024年，農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場將由現有參與者主導，佔78%的市場佔有率。另一方面，新興企業佔了22%的市場。隨著各行各業越來越重視採用更永續的解決方案，我們很可能會看到越來越多的參與者逐年進入全球農業碳權市場。

本報告研究了全球農業、林業和土地使用碳權市場，概述了市場狀況以及應用、計劃類型和地區的趨勢，並介紹了參與市場的公司概況。

目錄

執行摘要

第1章 市場

  • 趨勢：現況與未來影響評估
  • 供應鏈概覽
  • 研發評審
  • 監管狀況
  • 相關利益者分析
  • 新興Start-Ups
  • 市場動態概覽
  • Start-Ups資金籌措摘要

第2章 應用

  • 應用程式細分
  • 使用摘要
  • 農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場、林業和土地利用（按應用）
    • 拆除計劃
    • 迴避計劃
    • 組合計劃

第3章 產品

  • 產品細分
  • 產品摘要
  • 農業、林業和土地利用碳權市場（按計劃類型）
    • 林業和土地利用
    • 農業

第4章 區域

  • 區域摘要
  • 促進因素和約束因素
  • 北美洲
  • 歐洲
  • 亞太地區
  • 其他地區

第5章 市場競爭基準化分析與公司概況

  • 未來展望
  • 地理評估
    • Indigo Ag, Inc.
    • Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
    • Terra Global Capital
    • South Pole
    • Nori, Inc.
    • The California Air Resources Board
    • Cargill, Incorporated
    • Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
    • Ecosystem Services Market Consortium
    • Bayer AG
    • 3Degrees Group, Inc
    • NATUREOFFICE
    • Climetrek
    • EKI Energy Services Ltd.
    • Finite Carbon Corporation

第6章調查方法

Product Code: AGA1969SB

This report can be delivered within 1 working day.

Introduction of Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use

The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use monetizes on-farm practices that sequester atmospheric CO2 or avoid greenhouse gas emissions, transforming regenerative techniques, such as cover cropping, reduced tillage, agroforestry, and peatland restoration, into tradable environmental assets. In this voluntary market segment, each credit represents one metric ton of CO2e removed or avoided by agricultural activities, validated under rigorous frameworks such as Verra's VCS, Gold Standard's Climate and Agriculture methodology, or the emerging EU Carbon Removals & Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation. By channeling private capital into soil health and land-use innovations, the market offers farmers new revenue streams and bolsters global climate mitigation efforts through scalable, nature-based solutions.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Forecast Period2025 - 2035
2025 Evaluation$8.80 Billion
2035 Forecast$67.07 Billion
CAGR22.51%

Market Introduction

As of 2024, agricultural carbon credits account for roughly 100 Mt CO2e of the ~216 Mt CO2e in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) voluntary market, with prices averaging $4-6/tCO2e, nearly 15 % below forestry premiums. Leading food and agribusiness firms (e.g., Bayer's ForGround, Indigo Ag, Nutrien) have enrolled over 3,000 growers across North America and Europe, leveraging satellite-based monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) tools to streamline project validation. Despite this momentum, fragmented methodology adoption and investor caution around permanence and additionality continue to constrain credit volumes, keeping agriculture's share at approximately 30 % of total AFOLU issuance.

Over the next decade, robust policy drivers, such as the EU's CRCF voluntary certification and anticipated U.S. "carbon farming" incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act, are expected to double annual agriculture-credit issuances to 200+ Mt CO2e by 2035. Advances in digital MRV (including drone-enabled soil-carbon mapping, blockchain-based registries, and AI-driven emissions modeling) will lower project development costs by 20-30 %, unlocking participation among smallholder and specialty-crop producers. Meanwhile, corporates across CPG, retail, and financial services are poised to integrate on-farm credits into comprehensive nature-positive portfolios.

Industrial Impact

The burgeoning carbon credits market compels agribusiness conglomerates and input suppliers to recalibrate their investment portfolios. Leading seed and fertilizer manufacturers, such as Corteva Agriscience and Nutrien, now allocate substantial R&D budgets toward carbon-smart products (e.g., low-tillage seed coatings, nutrient-use-efficiency inoculants) that qualify for soil?carbon protocols. This shift not only opens new service lines, but farmers can earn $15-$25/ha in upfront payments for adopting coated seeds or microbial biostimulants, as well as hedge revenue streams against commodity-price volatility. In response, private equity funds have been syndicating deals to bundle soil-carbon practices with precision?agriculture sensors, underwriting equipment-as-a-service contracts that deliver both agronomic and carbon outcomes.

On-farm operations have been undergoing a systemic redesign to optimize carbon sequestration alongside yield goals. Equipment OEMs such as John Deere and AGCO deploy telemetry-enabled, banded-application fertilizer rigs and high-clearance air seeding implements that reduce soil disturbance by up to 80%. These machines integrate directly with carbon?quantification platforms (e.g., Project Carbonview), automatically logging reduced-till passes and residue cover metrics to verifiers. By embedding carbon-credit eligibility as a native feature, operators streamline third?party audits, shrinking verification timelines from 90 days to under 30 days and capturing incremental returns of $10-$15 per acre, effectively lowering the breakeven cost of precision equipment by 8-12 %.

Grain handlers, ethanol producers, and food processors are increasingly conditioning offtake contracts on verified carbon attributes. Major cooperatives such as CHS and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) have instituted "carbon?differentiated basis premiums," paying farmers an extra $0.50-$1.00/bushel for corn delivered with chain-of-custody carbon certificates. To enforce traceability, these buyers integrate blockchain-anchored ledgers powered by providers such as Xpansiv and Persefoni that reconcile registry retirements with physical grain loads in real-time. Such frameworks reduce double?counting risk and allow processors to report carbon-neutral products to end markets, fetching 5-10 % price premiums in Europe and North America under voluntary labeling schemes.

Industrial stakeholders, from agrochemical giants to multinational grain traders, have been leveraging carbon-credit portfolios as a strategic hedge against emerging compliance regimes and border adjustment measures. For example, the EU's proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) incentivizes non-EU soy and maize exporters to internalize embedded emissions, effectively valuing carbon credits at up to $33.96 / tCO2. Companies with established AFOLU-credit channels can offset potential CBAM liabilities by retiring voluntary credits, thereby smoothing tariff exposures. Simultaneously, insurers are offering bespoke "carbon-performance" underwriting, reducing premiums by 10-15 % for farms that maintain verified carbon sinks, further embedding carbon-credit economics into industrial risk models.

Market Segmentation:

Segmentation 1: by Application

  • Removal Project
  • Avoidance Project
  • Combination Project

Removal Project Segment to Dominate the Global Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application)

Removal-focused initiatives have surged to the forefront of the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use sphere because they lock carbon into soils and biomass indefinitely rather than merely averting future emissions. Techniques such as deep-rooting cover crops, biochar soil amendments, and integrated agroforestry not only sequester CO2 but also bolster soil fertility, yield stability, and ecosystem diversity, qualities that satisfy stringent permanence requirements and attract price premiums of 20-30 percent over avoidance credits. The advent of high-resolution satellite imagery and AI-enabled soil-carbon modeling has slashed MRV expenses and accelerated audit timelines, further enticing corporate buyers who need demonstrable, long-lasting offsets for their net-zero commitments. As regulatory regimes such as the EU's Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation increasingly reward genuine removals, removal-centric projects will continue to command the lion's share of AFOLU credit demand.

Segmentation 2: by Project Type

  • Forestry and Land Use
    • REDD+
    • ARR
    • IFM
  • Agriculture

Forestry Segment to Witness the Highest Growth between 2024 and 2035

The forestry segment is set to outpace other AFOLU categories from 2024 through 2035 due to its superior per-hectare carbon-sequestration potential, well-established measurement methodologies, and strong demand from corporate net-zero programs. Recent enhancements in remote?sensing and LiDAR-based forest-growth modeling have slashed verification costs by up to 30%, making large-scale reforestation and improved forest management projects more bankable. Simultaneously, regulatory tailwinds, such as the EU's Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, explicitly prioritize long-lived, nature-based removals such as afforestation, driving premium pricing (+15% vs. the VCM average) and long-term offtake contracts from major industrial emitters. Moreover, forestry projects deliver co-benefits (biodiversity, watershed protection, community livelihoods) that align with evolving ESG mandates, further reinforcing forestry's dominant growth trajectory in the voluntary carbon credits market for agriculture and land use.

Segmentation 3: by Region

  • North America - U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific- China, Japan, South Korea, India, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • Rest-of-the-World- Brazil, South Africa, and Others

Asia-Pacific led the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use in 2024 owing to a convergence of large-scale farming operations, ambitious corporate net-zero targets in China, Japan, and South Korea, and rapidly expanding government "carbon farming" incentives. In China, agricultural subsidy reforms under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs tied payments to soil-carbon sequestration pilots, unlocking hundreds of millions of dollars in project investment; meanwhile, Japan's Farm Carbon Offset Program and South Korea's Green New Deal both mandate voluntary agriculture offsets for key industrial sectors. Cost-competitive yields in emerging markets, where baseline emissions are higher and sequestration potential is vast, have driven a 38% year-on-year jump in AFOLU credit issuance, while digital MRV platforms have slashed verification timelines from months to weeks, further accelerating uptake. These factors have positioned Asia-Pacific as the fastest-growing region, outpacing both North America and Europe in volume and value growth.

Recent Developments in the Global Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use

  • In April 2025, Boomitra, a global leader in soil carbon markets, and the Social Carbon Foundation, the first accredited carbon certifier to fully integrate natural ecosystem and social impact in a high integrity carbon credit, announced the first issuance of soil organic carbon (SOC) removal credits through the Boomitra URVARA Project, marking a series of significant milestones in the global carbon credits market for agriculture.
  • In March 2025, Grow Indigo, an agritech startup focused on regenerative agriculture and carbon farming, raised $10 million in funding from British International Investments (BII), the U.K.'s development finance institution. The funding aims to help expand the startup's sustainability initiatives, which already cover 2.5 million acres of farmland across seven Indian states, and accelerate its carbon credit program to benefit smallholder farmers.
  • In October 2024, four big global companies, Bayer, GenZero (a wholly-owned arm of financial major Temasek), Shell, and Mitsubishi, decided to scale up their carbon credit program in nine states to empower farmers. The credits are generated through the adoption of smart agriculture practices, alternate wetting and drying (AWD), and direct seeded rice (DSR). These credits could be traded to enable farmers to get some extra income. The alliance planned to expand its program by adding nearly 8,500 hectares, streamlining the scientific measurement of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies, and strengthening the farmer handholding and support system. The program further aimed to explore scale-up based on the experiences of the first two years of implementation.

Demand - Drivers and Limitations

Market Demand Drivers: Achieving Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Goal by 2050

Corporate net-zero commitments by 2050 have rapidly escalated demand for high?integrity agricultural, forestry, and land?use (AFOLU) credits. Unilever, which traces a significant portion of its emissions to agricultural supply chains, has already cut its direct and energy?procured emissions by over 70 % since 2015 and aims to eliminate the remainder as soon as 2030. To bridge the gap between internal reductions and absolute neutrality, multi?year purchases of soil-carbon and forestry credits from projects in Latin America and Southeast Asia are being locked in. Apple, having achieved operational neutrality in 2020, has committed to full value?chain neutrality by 2030; its Restore Fund channels nearly USD 280 million into conservation and reforestation schemes in Brazil and Paraguay, specifically targeting durable removals. Luxury group Kering, approved by the Science Based Targets initiative, has been reducing Scopes 1 and 2 emissions by 90 % versus 2015 levels by 2030, underpinning this ambition with nature?based credit procurement. Ingka Group (IKEA) likewise plans to halve its value?chain emissions by 2030, signaling significant AFOLU credit offtakes to offset residual emissions. These urgent net?zero roadmaps effectively convert corporate sustainability pledges into real?world demand for AFOLU carbon projects, driving market growth and underpinning project finance.

Market Restraints: Land Tenure Uncertainty and Registration Delays

Land tenure uncertainty and registration delays undermine the foundational eligibility of agricultural, forestry, and land use projects for carbon credit issuance. Development protocols across leading registries, such as Verra's VM0042 for Improved Agricultural Land Management, mandate that project proponents demonstrate clear, legally recognized rights to the land through freehold ownership, long?term leases, or equivalent statutory titles registered with national land authorities. In many regions of Africa and Latin America, however, customary land tenure systems coexist alongside statutory regimes, creating ambiguity over who holds formal rights. Project developers often spend six to twelve months, or longer, securing and validating lease agreements or negotiating title clarifications before even applying for registry listing. This protracted pre-registration phase delays credit issuance and escalates transaction costs, eroding project IRRs and deterring smallholder aggregation models that rely on streamlined onboarding.

Market Opportunities: Blockchain Tokenization and Retail Access

Blockchain tokenization has been revolutionizing access to carbon credits for agricultural, forestry, and land use by transforming traditionally illiquid, registry-bound offsets into programmable digital assets that can be traded 24/7 on open markets. Through tokenization, each carbon credit, originally issued as a registry-managed certificate, is "bridged" onto a blockchain network and minted as a fungible or non-fungible token. This process enables fractional ownership, on-chain retirement, and real-time proof of provenance, while smart contracts automate compliance with registry rules and retirement protocols. As a result, buyers can transact in smaller lots, participate directly in carbon credits market from retail wallets, and verify retirement status instantly via public ledgers. By lowering minimum trade sizes and bypassing cumbersome bilateral negotiations, tokenization opens carbon markets to a broader retail investor base, individuals, family offices, and SME buyers while maintaining the high-integrity standards required by registries.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader understand the different types of products and applications for the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use. Moreover, the study provides the reader with a detailed understanding of the carbon credits market for a agriculture, forestry, and land use by application based on application (removal project, avoidance project, and combination project) and product on the basis of project type (forestry and land use, (which comprises of REDD+, ARR, and IFM), and Agriculture.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use has seen major development by key players operating in the market, such as business expansion, partnership, collaboration, and joint venture. The favored strategy for the companies has been partnerships, contracts, and business expansion to strengthen their position in the carbon credits market for agriculture. For instance, in August 2024, The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) held a high-level meeting in Mumbai to forge partnerships and strengthen collaboration between the two organizations. The meeting marked a significant step toward collaborative efforts in developing a carbon fund, strengthening Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), and promoting sustainable agricultural systems in India.

Competitive Strategy: Key players in the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use analyzed and profiled in the study involve major companies offering carbon credits for various applications. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Methodology: The research methodology design adopted for this specific study includes a mix of data collected from primary and secondary data sources. Both primary resources (key players, market leaders, and in-house experts) and secondary research (a host of paid and unpaid databases), along with analytical tools, are employed to build the predictive and forecast models.

Data and validation have been taken into consideration from both primary sources as well as secondary sources.

Key Considerations and Assumptions in Market Engineering and Validation

  • Detailed secondary research has been done to ensure maximum coverage of manufacturers/suppliers operational in a country.
  • To a certain extent, exact revenue information has been extracted for each company from secondary sources and databases. Revenues specific to product/service/technology were then estimated for each market player based on fact-based proxy indicators and primary inputs.
  • Based on the classification, the average selling price (ASP) has been calculated using the weighted average method.
  • The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of Oanda and/or other relevant websites.
  • Any economic downturn in the future has not been taken into consideration for the market estimation and forecast.
  • The base currency considered for the market analysis is US$. Considering the average conversion rate for that particular year, currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations.

Primary Research

The primary sources involve experts from various industries, including the carbon industry and agriculture industry, among others. Respondents such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study.

Secondary Research

This study involves the usage of extensive secondary research, company websites, directories, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Businessweek and others, to collect effective and useful information for a market-oriented, technical, commercial, and extensive study of the global market. In addition to the data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites, such as www.nasa.gov.

Secondary research was done to obtain critical information about the industry's value chain, the market's monetary chain, revenue models, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled for the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use have been selected based on thorough secondary research, which includes analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, market penetration, and insights gathered from primary experts.

The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use comprises key players who have established themselves thoroughly and understand the market, accompanied by startups looking forward to establishing themselves in this highly competitive market. In 2024, the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use was dominated by established players, accounting for 78% of the market share. In contrast, startups managed to capture 22% of the market. With the increasing focus on adopting more sustainable solutions across various industries, more players will enter the global carbon credits market for agriculture with each passing year.

Some prominent names established in the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use are:

  • Indigo Ag, Inc.
  • Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
  • Terra Global Capital
  • South Pole
  • Nori, Inc.
  • The California Air Resources Board (CARB)
  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
  • Ecosystem Services Market Consortium (ESMC)
  • Bayer AG
  • 3Degrees Group, Inc.
  • NATUREOFFICE
  • Climetrek
  • EKI Energy Services Ltd.
  • Finite Carbon Corporation

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope and Definition

1 Markets

  • 1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
    • 1.1.1 Trends: Overview
    • 1.1.2 Adoption of Digital MRV Technologies
    • 1.1.3 Expansion of Long Term Corporate Offtake Agreements
  • 1.2 Supply Chain Overview
    • 1.2.1 Pricing Forecast
  • 1.3 Research and Development Review
    • 1.3.1 Patent Filing Trend (by Country and Company)
  • 1.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 1.5 Stakeholder Analysis
  • 1.6 Emerging Start-Ups
  • 1.7 Market Dynamics Overview
    • 1.7.1 Market Drivers
      • 1.7.1.1 Achieving Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Goal by 2050
      • 1.7.1.2 Digital MRV Protocol Harmonization
      • 1.7.1.3 Carbon-Linked Agricultural Finance and Insurance
    • 1.7.2 Market Restraints
      • 1.7.2.1 Land Tenure Uncertainty and Registration Delays
      • 1.7.2.2 Carbon Permanence and Reversal Risk
    • 1.7.3 Market Opportunities
      • 1.7.3.1 Blockchain Tokenization and Retail Access
      • 1.7.3.2 Blended Finance Structures (Grants + Equity + Debt)
  • 1.8 Startup Funding Summary

2 Application

  • 2.1 Application Segmentation
  • 2.2 Application Summary
  • 2.3 Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application)
    • 2.3.1 Removal Project
    • 2.3.2 Avoidance Project
    • 2.3.3 Combination Project

3 Products

  • 3.1 Product Segmentation
  • 3.2 Product Summary
  • 3.3 Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type)
    • 3.3.1 Forestry and Land Use
      • 3.3.1.1 REDD+
      • 3.3.1.2 ARR
      • 3.3.1.3 IFM
    • 3.3.2 Agriculture

4 Region

  • 4.1 Regional Summary
  • 4.2 Drivers and Restraints
  • 4.3 North America
    • 4.3.1 Market
    • 4.3.2 Key Market Participants in North America
    • 4.3.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.3.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.3.5 Application
    • 4.3.6 Product
      • 4.3.6.1 U.S
        • 4.3.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.3.6.2 Canada
        • 4.3.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.3.6.3 Mexico
        • 4.3.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.3.2 Product
  • 4.4 Europe
    • 4.4.1 Market
    • 4.4.2 Key Market Participants in Europe
    • 4.4.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.4.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.4.5 Application
    • 4.4.6 Product
  • 4.5 Asia-Pacific
    • 4.5.1 Market
    • 4.5.2 Key Market Participants in Asia-Pacific
    • 4.5.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.5.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.5.5 Application
    • 4.5.6 Product
      • 4.5.6.1 China
        • 4.5.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.2 Japan
        • 4.5.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.3 India
        • 4.5.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.3.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.4 South Korea
        • 4.5.6.4.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.4.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.5 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
        • 4.5.6.5.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.5.2 Product
  • 4.6 Rest-of-the-World
    • 4.6.1 Market
    • 4.6.2 Key Market Participants in Rest-of-the-World
    • 4.6.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.6.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.6.5 Application
    • 4.6.6 Product
      • 4.6.6.1 Brazil
        • 4.6.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.6.6.2 South Africa
        • 4.6.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.6.6.3 Others
        • 4.6.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.3.2 Product

5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

  • 5.1 Next Frontiers
  • 5.2 Geographic Assessment
    • 5.2.1 Indigo Ag, Inc.
      • 5.2.1.1 Overview
      • 5.2.1.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.1.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.1.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.1.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.1.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.1.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.2 Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
      • 5.2.2.1 Overview
      • 5.2.2.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.2.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.2.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.2.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.2.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.2.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.3 Terra Global Capital
      • 5.2.3.1 Overview
      • 5.2.3.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.3.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.3.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.3.5 Key Partners
      • 5.2.3.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.4 South Pole
      • 5.2.4.1 Overview
      • 5.2.4.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.4.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.4.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.4.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.4.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.5 Nori, Inc.
      • 5.2.5.1 Overview
      • 5.2.5.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.5.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.5.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.5.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.5.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.5.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.6 The California Air Resources Board
      • 5.2.6.1 Overview
      • 5.2.6.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.6.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.6.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.6.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.6.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.6.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.7 Cargill, Incorporated
      • 5.2.7.1 Overview
      • 5.2.7.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.7.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.7.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.7.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.7.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.7.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.8 Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
      • 5.2.8.1 Overview
      • 5.2.8.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.8.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.8.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.8.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.8.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.8.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.9 Ecosystem Services Market Consortium
      • 5.2.9.1 Overview
      • 5.2.9.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.9.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.9.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.9.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.9.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.9.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.10 Bayer AG
      • 5.2.10.1 Overview
      • 5.2.10.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.10.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.10.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.10.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.10.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.10.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.11 3Degrees Group, Inc
      • 5.2.11.1 Overview
      • 5.2.11.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.11.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.11.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.11.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.11.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.12 NATUREOFFICE
      • 5.2.12.1 Overview
      • 5.2.12.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.12.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.12.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.12.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.12.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.13 Climetrek
      • 5.2.13.1 Overview
      • 5.2.13.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.13.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.13.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.13.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.13.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.13.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.14 EKI Energy Services Ltd.
      • 5.2.14.1 Overview
      • 5.2.14.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.14.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.14.4 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.14.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.14.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.14.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.15 Finite Carbon Corporation
      • 5.2.15.1 Overview
      • 5.2.15.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.15.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.15.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.15.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.15.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.15.7 Analyst View

6 Research Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources
    • 6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
    • 6.1.3 Data Triangulation
  • 6.2 Market Estimation and Forecast

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 2: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 3: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 4: Key Events
  • Figure 5: Supply Chain and Risks within the Supply Chain
  • Figure 6: Average Pricing Scenario, 2024-2035
  • Figure 7: Patent Analysis (by Country), January 2021-March 2025
  • Figure 8: Patent Analysis (by Company), January 2021-March 2025
  • Figure 9: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 10: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 11: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 12: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 13: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 14: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 15: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 16: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 17: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 18: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 19: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 20: Strategic Initiatives, 2020-2023
  • Figure 21: Share of Strategic Initiatives, January 2021-April 2024
  • Figure 22: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 23: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach
  • Figure 24: Assumptions and Limitations

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Market Snapshot
  • Table 2: Opportunities across Regions
  • Table 3: Trends Overview
  • Table 4: Regulatory and Policy Landscape
  • Table 5: Stakeholder Analysis
  • Table 6: Emerging Start-ups
  • Table 7: Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors, 2024-2034
  • Table 8: Startup and Investment Landscape
  • Table 9: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 10: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 11: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 12: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 13: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 14: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 15: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 16: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use) Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 17: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 18: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 19: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 20: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 21: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 22: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 23: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 24: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 25: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 26: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 27: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 28: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 29: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 30: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 31: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 32: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 33: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 34: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 35: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 36: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 37: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 38: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 39: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 40: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 41: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 42: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 43: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 44: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 45: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 46: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 47: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 48: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 49: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 50: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 51: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 52: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 53: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 54: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 55: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 56: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 57: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 58: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 59: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 60: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 61: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 62: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 63: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 64: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 65: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 66: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 67: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 68: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 69: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 70: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 71: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 72: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 73: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 74: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 75: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 76: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 77: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 78: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 79: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 80: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 81: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 82: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 83: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 84: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 85: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 86: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 87: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 88: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 89: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 90: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 91: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 92: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 93: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 94: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 95: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 96: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 97: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 98: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 99: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 100: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035