首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 航空與太空

軍事與防禦

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1706590

以網路為中心的戰鬥的全球市場:2025年～2035年

Global Network Centric Warfare 2025-2035

出版日期: 2025年04月16日 | 出版商:

Aviation & Defense Market Reports (A&D) | 英文 150+ Pages | 商品交期: 3個工作天內

價格

簡介目錄圖表

全球網路中心戰市場規模預計在 2025 年為 187.5 億美元，預計到 2035 年將成長到 386.7 億美元，在 2025-2035 年預測期內的複合年增長率 (CAGR) 為 7.51%。

Global Network Centric Warfare 2025-2035

網路中心戰市場介紹：

網路中心戰 (NCW) 代表了軍事理論的變革性轉變，其核心是利用資訊優勢來獲得戰術和戰略優勢。無縫整合感測器、通訊網路、指揮系統和作戰力量，創造一個有凝聚力、反應迅速、即時的作戰環境。 NCW 的核心是將資訊轉化為戰鬥力——連接跨領域的射手、決策者和資訊資產，以增強態勢感知、同步行動並加快決策週期。

傳統的指揮和控制結構正在被數位互聯繫統所取代，從而實現分散決策和協調回應。該框架將使軍隊能夠以更大的靈活性、精確度和適應性開展行動，特別是在動態和複雜的作戰區域。網路中心戰將不僅限於空中和網路領域，還將擴展到陸地、海上、太空和聯合部隊環境，即時整合力量，重塑戰場態勢。在當今的多域衝突中，威脅混合、分散且技術複雜，NCW 對於獲得資訊優勢和實現力量倍增至關重要。從即時無人機饋送到衛星通訊中繼，全球防禦格局日益由盟軍之間資訊共享的深度和速度決定。

科技對網路中心作戰市場的影響：

支援 NCW 的技術環境正在快速發展，並從根本上改變現代軍隊計劃和開展行動的方式。 NCW 的核心是寬頻通訊基礎設施，包括戰術資料鏈路、衛星網路和 5G/6G 功能。這些確保了網路中所有節點之間的不間斷連接，無論是地面部隊、空中資產或指揮中心。人工智慧 (AI) 和機器學習 (ML) 將在提高 NCW 效率方面發揮關鍵作用。人工智慧演算法可以即時處理大量資料集，以識別威脅、提出戰術回應或以最少的人為幹預優化資產部署。預測分析還可以實現更好的任務規劃和風險評估，使指揮官對其作戰決策更有信心。

無人駕駛汽車、遠端感測器和機器人輔助裝置等自主系統的興起進一步增加了我們對網路架構的依賴。這些資產通常半獨立運行，但仍與指揮網絡緊密整合，需要強大而安全的協議來保持同步和響應。網路安全和彈性也已成為網路中心戰系統的重要組成部分。由於整個理論依賴於資料流和數位連接，因此保護通訊鏈路和防止資料外洩、幹擾和網路破壞至關重要。這就是為什麼量子加密、區塊鏈安全通訊和多層身份驗證機制正在積極開發和實施的原因。

另一個重要的技術進步是穿戴式戰場網路與智慧士兵系統的整合。現代步兵裝備現在配備了可穿戴電腦、平視顯示器、生物感測器和戰術無線電。這將創造一個數位化的戰士，他們可以在與無人機、車輛和指揮中心即時互動的同時保持敏捷和殺傷力。

網路中心戰市場的關鍵推動因素：

有幾個核心推動因素正在推動 NCW 能力的全球採用和擴展：

日益增加的作戰複雜性和多領域戰爭使得傳統部隊結構的效率降低。在現代衝突中，決策速度和跨陸地、海上、空中、網路和太空領域的協同能力至關重要。 NCW 可以實現這種整合的、快節奏的作戰，相對於依賴速度較慢的遺留系統的對手，它具有不對稱優勢。

地緣政治不穩定和聯盟變化也影響全球防禦態勢。由於各國面臨不確定的安全環境，他們正在投資 NCW 以改善自身的防禦態勢和與盟軍的互通能力。例如，北約高度重視聯合作戰能力和協同指揮體系，成員國採用網路中心戰的進程正在加速。

隨著技術融合——人工智慧、雲端運算、邊緣處理和物聯網的融合——NCW 所需的基礎設施變得越來越容易存取和可擴展。軍隊現在可以使用現成的技術與定制的軍用級解決方案相結合來構建有彈性的模組化 NCW 框架，從而降低成本並縮短部署時間。

叛亂網路、網路攻擊和無人機群等非對稱和混合威脅進一步要求使用 NCW。與傳統軍隊不同，這些威脅往往是分散的、機動的。應對這些問題需要快速傳播威脅情報、靈活的部署策略和即時威脅可見性，這些都是 NCW 的標誌。

世界各地的國防現代化計劃都專注於數位化和連通性。各國已開始圍繞網路中心戰採取舉措，包括重組指揮結構、更新具有網路功能的平台以及訓練部隊在聯網戰場上作戰。採購重點正在轉向可以無縫 "插入" 這種數位架構的平台和系統。

最後，聯盟和多國行動中的互通性要求正在推動 NCW 技術的標準化和採用。無論是聯合演習還是作戰任務，部隊之間能夠共享共同的作戰影像都至關重要，而網路中心戰為這種同步提供了支撐。

網路中心戰市場的區域趨勢：

美國是網路中心戰能力的先驅和主導力量。透過 JADC2（聯合全局指揮與控制）等項目，美國國防部正在將陸軍、海軍、空軍、海軍陸戰隊和太空部隊等所有軍種整合到由人工智慧和自主系統支援的統一指揮結構中，從而改變戰爭方式。加拿大也在推動數位指揮能力，以更好地協調聯合行動並加強其北極防禦態勢。北約接受國家中心戰作為集體防禦的重要工具。歐洲國家正在投資跨成員國運作的安全、可互通的指揮平台。德國的 "數位化軍隊" 和英國的 "陸地環境戰術通訊和資訊系統" （LE TacCIS）就是陸軍數位化和創造即插即用指揮環境的典範。法國、瑞典和波蘭也將NCW框架納入其防空、邊境監視和遠徵行動。

中國正在 "資訊化" 的旗號下大力推進其網路中心能力。中國人民解放軍的目標是建立集太空、網路和動能作戰於一體的統一指揮網絡。日本和韓國正在對其 C4ISR（指揮、控制、通訊、電腦、情報、監視和偵察）基礎設施進行現代化改造，以確保快速資料共享和即時威脅響應，尤其是在地區緊張局勢下。作為其未來部隊概念的一部分，澳洲正在投資綜合戰鬥管理系統，旨在實現無縫聯合作戰。沙烏地阿拉伯、阿聯酋和卡達等海灣國家正迅速採用網路中心戰系統來加強其內部安全和力量投射。該地區的採購策略強調綜合防空反導系統以及裝甲和步兵部隊的戰場數位化。以色列繼續在網路中心戰部署方面處於領先地位，特別是在感測器融合、無人機協調和網路戰場感知方面。

非洲的國家網路中心戰實施仍處於起步階段，但正在不斷發展。南非、埃及和奈及利亞等國家已經採用了基本的網路中心組件來協調反叛亂和邊境安全行動。非洲大陸面臨的課題——從糟糕的連通基礎設施到有限的預算——正在減緩採用該技術的步伐。然而，捐助國支持的現代化計畫和區域安全倡議正在將 NCW 原則引入一些軍事單位。

重大網路中心戰計畫

在印度，無人機和飛彈等先進系統的引進引起了媒體的關注。然而，在公眾看來，印度仍然存在巨大的能力差距，包括印度空軍中隊實力下降、海軍潛艇短缺以及陸軍推遲引進先進追蹤火砲系統（ATAGS）。仍然存在一個關鍵但不太明顯的差距，那就是陸軍 20 多年來對全面網路中心作戰能力的長期需求。其中的核心是為陸軍實施綜合戰場管理系統 (BMS)，這項需求需要持續的關注和解決。

本報告提供全球以網路為中心的戰鬥市場相關調查，彙整10年的各分類市場預測，技術趨勢，機會分析，企業簡介，各國資料等資訊。

本部分涵蓋該地區網路中心戰的趨勢、推動因素、阻礙因素、課題以及政治、經濟、社會和技術層面。它還提供了詳細的區域市場預測和情境分析。區域分析的最後階段包括主要公司概況、供應商格局和公司基準測試。目前市場規模是根據正常業務情境估算的。

北美

促進因素，阻礙因素，課題

PEST

市場預測與情勢分析

主要企業

供應商階層的形勢

企業基準

歐洲

中東

亞太地區

南美

各國網路中心戰分析

本章重點介紹該市場的主要防禦計劃，並介紹該市場的最新新聞和專利。它還提供國家級的 10 年市場預測和情境分析。

美國

防衛計劃

市場預測與情勢分析

加拿大

義大利

法國

德國

荷蘭

比利時

西班牙

瑞典

希臘

澳洲

南非

印度

中國

俄羅斯

韓國

日本

馬來西亞

新加坡

巴西

以網路為中心的戰鬥的機會矩陣

以網路為中心的戰鬥相關專家的意見報告

結論

關於航空·國防市場報告

簡介目錄圖表

Product Code: AND237

The Global Network Centric Warfare market is estimated at USD 18.75 billion in 2025, projected to grow to USD 38.67 billion by 2035 at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.51% over the forecast period 2025-2035.

Introduction to Network Centric Warfare Market:

Network Centric Warfare (NCW) represents a transformative shift in military doctrine, centered on leveraging information superiority to gain a tactical and strategic advantage. It involves the seamless integration of sensors, communication networks, command systems, and combat units into a cohesive, responsive, and real-time operational environment. At its core, NCW is about turning information into combat power-connecting shooters, decision-makers, and intelligence assets across domains to achieve enhanced situational awareness, synchronized operations, and faster decision cycles.

Traditional command-and-control structures are being replaced by digitally interconnected systems that enable distributed decision-making and coordinated responses. This framework allows militaries to operate with greater agility, precision, and adaptability, particularly in dynamic and complex combat theaters. Network centric operations are not confined to air or cyber realms-they extend across ground, sea, space, and joint-forces environments, unifying efforts in real-time and reshaping battlefield dynamics. In today's multi-domain conflicts-where threats are hybrid, dispersed, and technologically sophisticated-NCW is critical for gaining information dominance and enabling force multiplication. From real-time UAV feeds to satellite communication relays, the global defense landscape is increasingly defined by the depth and speed of information sharing among allied units.

Technology Impact in Network Centric Warfare Market:

The technology landscape underpinning NCW has advanced rapidly, fundamentally altering how modern militaries plan and execute operations. At the heart of NCW are high-bandwidth communication infrastructures, including tactical data links, satellite networks, and 5G/6G capabilities. These ensure uninterrupted connectivity between all nodes in the network, whether ground troops, air assets, or command centers. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) play a significant role in enhancing the efficiency of NCW. AI algorithms can process massive datasets in real time, identifying threats, suggesting tactical responses, or optimizing asset deployment with minimal human intervention. Predictive analytics also enables better mission planning and risk assessment, giving commanders more confidence in their operational decisions.

The rise of autonomous systems-such as unmanned vehicles, remote sensors, and robotic support units-has further intensified reliance on networked architecture. These assets often operate semi-independently but remain tightly integrated within the command network, requiring robust and secure protocols to maintain synchronization and responsiveness. Cybersecurity and resilience have also become integral aspects of NCW systems. Since the entire doctrine depends on data flow and digital connectivity, defending communication links and protecting against data breaches, jamming, and cyber sabotage are paramount. As such, quantum encryption, blockchain-secured communications, and multi-layered authentication mechanisms are being actively developed and deployed.

Another key technological advancement is the integration of wearable battlefield networks and smart soldier systems. Modern infantry kits now include body-worn computers, heads-up displays, biosensors, and tactical radios-all of which feed into and extract data from the broader network. This creates a digitized warfighter, capable of interacting with drones, vehicles, and headquarters in real-time while remaining mobile and lethal.

Key Drivers in Network Centric Warfare Market:

Several core drivers are propelling the adoption and expansion of NCW capabilities on a global scale.

Operational complexity and multi-domain warfare have made traditional force structures less effective. In modern conflicts, the speed of decision-making and the ability to coordinate across land, sea, air, cyber, and space domains are crucial. NCW enables that kind of integrated, fast-paced operation, offering an asymmetric advantage over adversaries relying on slower, legacy systems.

Geopolitical instability and shifting alliances are also influencing the global defense posture. As nations face uncertain security environments, they are investing in NCW to boost their defense readiness and interoperability with allied forces. For instance, NATO's emphasis on joint operability and coordinated command systems has accelerated NCW adoption among member states.

Technological convergence-the blending of AI, cloud computing, edge processing, and IoT-has made the infrastructure required for NCW more accessible and scalable. Militaries are now able to build resilient, modular NCW frameworks using off-the-shelf technologies integrated with custom military-grade solutions, reducing cost and deployment time.

Asymmetric and hybrid threats, such as insurgent networks, cyberattacks, and drone swarms, further necessitate the use of NCW. Unlike conventional armies, these threats are often decentralized and mobile. Countering them requires the rapid dissemination of intelligence, flexible deployment strategies, and real-time threat visualization-all hallmarks of NCW.

Defense modernization programs globally are heavily focused on digitization and connectivity. Countries are launching NCW-centric initiatives that restructure command chains, update platforms with networking capabilities, and train forces to operate in a connected battlefield. Procurement priorities are shifting toward platforms and systems that can "plug into" these digital architectures seamlessly.

Lastly, interoperability requirements in coalition and multinational operations are driving standardization and adoption of NCW technologies. Whether in joint exercises or real-world missions, being able to share a common operational picture across forces is essential-and NCW provides the backbone for such synchronization.

Regional Trends in Network Centric Warfare Market:

The United States is the pioneer and dominant force in NCW capabilities. Through programs like Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), the U.S. Department of Defense is transforming how it fights wars by integrating all branches-Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Space Force-into a unified command structure supported by AI and autonomous systems. Canada is similarly advancing its digital command capabilities to better coordinate joint operations and reinforce Arctic defense postures. NATO has embraced NCW as a critical enabler of collective defense. European nations are investing in secure, interoperable command platforms that can work across member states. Germany's "Digitale Krafte" and the UK's "Land Environment Tactical Communication and Information Systems" (LE TacCIS) are examples of efforts to digitize land forces and create plug-and-play command environments. France, Sweden, and Poland are also integrating NCW frameworks into air defense, border surveillance, and expeditionary operations.

China is aggressively advancing its network-centric capabilities under the banner of "informatization." The People's Liberation Army (PLA) aims to build integrated command networks that unify space, cyber, and kinetic operations. Japan and South Korea are modernizing their C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) infrastructures to ensure rapid data sharing and real-time threat response, especially in the context of regional tensions. Australia is investing in integrated battle management systems as part of its future force initiatives, aiming for seamless joint-service operability. Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are rapidly adopting NCW systems to enhance both internal security and power projection. The region's procurement strategies emphasize integrated air and missile defense systems, as well as battlefield digitization for armored and infantry units. Israel remains a leader in NCW deployment, particularly in sensor fusion, drone coordination, and cyber-enabled battlefield awareness.

NCW implementation in Africa is still nascent but growing. Countries like South Africa, Egypt, and Nigeria are adopting basic network-centric components to coordinate counterinsurgency efforts and border patrol operations. The continent's challenges-ranging from low connectivity infrastructure to limited budget-slow down the pace of adoption. However, donor-backed modernization programs and regional security initiatives are introducing NCW principles into select military units.

Key Network Centric Warfare Program:

In India, media attention has increasingly centered on the induction of advanced systems such as drones and missiles. However, significant capability gaps remain in public perception-such as the Indian Air Force's declining squadron strength, the Navy's shortage of submarines, and the delayed induction of the Army's Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System (ATAGS). One critical yet less visible gap that persists is the Army's long-standing requirement-spanning over two decades-for comprehensive Network Centric Warfare capabilities. Central to this is the implementation of an Integrated Battlefield Management System (BMS) for land forces, a need that continues to demand focused attention and resolution

Network centric warfare Report Definition

Network Centric Warfare Segmentation

By Region

By Type

By Platform

Network centric warfare Analysis for next 10 Years

The 10-year network centric warfare analysis would give a detailed overview of network centric warfare growth, changing dynamics, technology adoption overviews and the overall market attractiveness is covered in this chapter.

Market Technologies of Network centric warfare

This segment covers the top 10 technologies that is expected to impact this market and the possible implications these technologies would have on the overall market.

Global Network centric warfare Forecast

The 10-year network centric warfare forecast of this market is covered in detailed across the segments which are mentioned above.

Regional Network centric warfare Trends & Forecast

The regional network centric warfare trends, drivers, restraints and Challenges of this market, the Political, Economic, Social and Technology aspects are covered in this segment. The market forecast and scenario analysis across regions are also covered in detailed in this segment. The last part of the regional analysis includes profiling of the key companies, supplier landscape and company benchmarking. The current market size is estimated based on the normal scenario.

North America

Drivers, Restraints and Challenges

PEST

Market Forecast & Scenario Analysis

Key Companies

Supplier Tier Landscape

Company Benchmarking

Europe

Middle East

APAC

South America

Country Analysis of Network centric warfare

This chapter deals with the key defense programs in this market, it also covers the latest news and patents which have been filed in this market. Country level 10 year market forecast and scenario analysis are also covered in this chapter.

Defense Programs

Market Forecast & Scenario Analysis

Canada

Italy

France

Germany

Netherlands

Belgium

Spain

Sweden

Greece

Australia

South Africa

India

China

Russia

South Korea

Japan

Malaysia

Singapore

Brazil

Opportunity Matrix for Network centric warfare

The opportunity matrix helps the readers understand the high opportunity segments in this market.

Expert Opinions on Network centric warfare Report

Hear from our experts their opinion of the possible analysis for this market.

Conclusions

About Aviation and Defense Market Reports

簡介目錄圖表

List of Tables

Table 1: 10 Year Market Outlook, 2025-2035
Table 2: Drivers, Impact Analysis, North America
Table 3: Restraints, Impact Analysis, North America
Table 4: Challenges, Impact Analysis, North America
Table 5: Drivers, Impact Analysis, Europe
Table 6: Restraints, Impact Analysis, Europe
Table 7: Challenges, Impact Analysis, Europe
Table 8: Drivers, Impact Analysis, Middle East
Table 9: Restraints, Impact Analysis, Middle East
Table 10: Challenges, Impact Analysis, Middle East
Table 11: Drivers, Impact Analysis, APAC
Table 12: Restraints, Impact Analysis, APAC
Table 13: Challenges, Impact Analysis, APAC
Table 14: Drivers, Impact Analysis, South America
Table 15: Restraints, Impact Analysis, South America
Table 16: Challenges, Impact Analysis, South America
Table 17: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 1, By Region, 2025-2035
Table 18: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 1, By Platform, 2025-2035
Table 19: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 1, By Type, 2025-2035
Table 20: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 2, By Region, 2025-2035
Table 21: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 2, By Platform, 2025-2035
Table 22: Scenario Analysis, Scenario 2, By Type, 2025-2035

List of Figures

Figure 1: Global Network Centric Warfare Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 2: Global Network Centric Warfare Market Forecast, By Region, 2025-2035
Figure 3: Global Network Centric Warfare Market Forecast, By Platform, 2025-2035
Figure 4: Global Network Centric Warfare Market Forecast, By Type, 2025-2035
Figure 5: North America, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 6: Europe, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 7: Middle East, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 8: APAC, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 9: South America, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 10: United States, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 11: United States, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 12: Canada, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 13: Canada, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 14: Italy, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 15: Italy, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 16: France, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 17: France, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 18: Germany, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 19: Germany, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 20: Netherlands, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 21: Netherlands, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 22: Belgium, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 23: Belgium, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 24: Spain, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 25: Spain, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 26: Sweden, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 27: Sweden, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 28: Brazil, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 29: Brazil, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 30: Australia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 31: Australia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 32: India, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 33: India, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 34: China, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 35: China, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 36: Saudi Arabia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 37: Saudi Arabia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 38: South Korea, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 39: South Korea, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 40: Japan, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 41: Japan, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 42: Malaysia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 43: Malaysia, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 44: Singapore, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 45: Singapore, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 46: United Kingdom, Network Centric Warfare Market, Technology Maturation, 2025-2035
Figure 47: United Kingdom, Network Centric Warfare Market, Market Forecast, 2025-2035
Figure 48: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Region (Cumulative Market), 2025-2035
Figure 49: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Region (CAGR), 2025-2035
Figure 50: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Platform (Cumulative Market), 2025-2035
Figure 51: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Platform (CAGR), 2025-2035
Figure 52: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Type (Cumulative Market), 2025-2035
Figure 53: Opportunity Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Type (CAGR), 2025-2035
Figure 54: Scenario Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, Cumulative Market, 2025-2035
Figure 55: Scenario Analysis, Network Centric Warfare Market, Global Market, 2025-2035
Figure 56: Scenario 1, Network Centric Warfare Market, Total Market, 2025-2035
Figure 57: Scenario 1, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Region, 2025-2035
Figure 58: Scenario 1, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Platform, 2025-2035
Figure 59: Scenario 1, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Type, 2025-2035
Figure 60: Scenario 2, Network Centric Warfare Market, Total Market, 2025-2035
Figure 61: Scenario 2, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Region, 2025-2035
Figure 62: Scenario 2, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Platform, 2025-2035
Figure 63: Scenario 2, Network Centric Warfare Market, By Type, 2025-2035
Figure 64: Company Benchmark, Network Centric Warfare Market, 2025-2035