查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
衛星通訊用平板天線:技術形勢
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1799224

衛星通訊用平板天線:技術形勢

Satcom Flat-Panel Antennas: Technology Landscape
出版日期: | 出版商: Analysys Mason | 英文 14 Slides | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

"沒有哪一項技術可以主導衛星通訊平板天線市場。"

本報告為衛星通訊 (satcom) 平板天線 (FPA) 技術格局提供了一個框架。

低地球軌道 (LEO) 星座和高速移動服務需要能夠動態波束控制的薄陣列來滿足客戶需求。在 FPA 類別中，供應商正在開發幾種不同類型的技術，每種技術的成本、效能以及對特定用例的適用性各不相同。

本報告分析了目前已在用或正在開發的五種最主要的衛星通訊 FPA 技術。報告對這些技術進行了定義和比較，並確定了性能和設計權衡。

五個屬性被視為一個比較框架。針對每個屬性，報告提供了基準測試能力，衛星通訊設備供應商和服務提供者可以以此為基礎比較解決方案並確定最適合其需求的目標參數。

本報告探討的問題

  • 衛星通訊FPA主要採用哪些技術？如何對它們進行分類？
  • 比較FPA技術時需要考慮的面向。
  • 各種FPA技術之間如何比較？它們各自的優缺點是什麼？
  • 可用於有效比較衛星通訊FPA技術的指標，即使跨平台尺寸和頻率也是如此。
  • 每個屬性的低/中/高效能基準。
簡介目錄

"No single technology for satellite communication flat-panel antennas dominates."

This report provides a framework for the satellite communication (satcom) flat-panel antenna (FPA) technology landscape.

FPAs are a crucial enabler of high-growth satcom use cases; low-Earth orbit (LEO) constellations and high-speed mobility services need low-profile arrays with dynamic beam steering to meet customers' needs. Within the FPA category, there are several distinct technology types that vendors are developing, which vary in their cost, performance and suitability for specific use cases.

In this report, we analyse the five most prominent technologies that are either already in use, or are being developed, for satcom FPAs. We define and compare these technologies to identify the performance and design trade-offs.

We consider five attributes to frame our comparisons. For each attribute, we include benchmark capabilities that satcom equipment vendors and service providers can use as a base for comparing solutions and identifying optimal target parameters for their needs.

Questions answered in this report:

  • What are the main technologies used for satcom FPAs, and how can these be categorised?
  • Which areas should be considered when comparing FPA technologies?
  • How do FPA technologies compare with each other, and what are the strengths and weaknesses of each?
  • Which metrics can be used to make effective comparisons between satcom FPA technologies, even across different platform sizes or frequencies?
  • What are the benchmarks for low/moderate/high performance for each attribute?