Evaluate when distributed Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure creates enough business value to compete with centralized hyperscaler AI infrastructure.
Focus AI grid investments toward centralized and regional inference opportunities before committing capital to Radio Access Network (RAN)-level accelerated compute deployments.
Prioritize enterprise and industrial AI use cases where latency, data sovereignty, or reduced data movement can justify deployments.
Critical Questions Answered:
How can telcos avoid being limited to low-margin infrastructure roles while hyperscalers capture most of the AI value chain?
What role will orchestration play in making distributed AI infrastructure economically viable?
Which enterprise, industrial, regulated, and consumer use cases are most likely to drive demand for distributed AI infrastructure?
Research Highlights:
Assessment of AI grid economics, including cost-per-token, Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) utilization, power and cooling costs, workload density, latency value, and comparisons with centralized hyperscaler infrastructure.
Evaluation of telco monetization options, including site leasing, direct GPU-based compute services, bundled compute and network services, and AI application platforms with Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), orchestration, and metering.
Who Should Read This?
Telco and infrastructure strategists who need to determine how existing data center, central office, exchange, and edge assets can support AI grid revenue opportunities.
Operators assessing whether to lease sites, deploy GPUs, bundle AI inference with connectivity, or build AI application platforms.
AI infrastructure vendors, networking suppliers, and orchestration platform providers with solutions for distributed AI workload placement, billing, and Service-Level Agreements (SLAs).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 KEY FINDINGS
2 KEY FORECASTS
3 KEY COMPANIES AND ECOSYSTEMS
3.1 AKAMAI
3.2 ATT
3.3 CISCO
3.4 CHINESE ECOSYSTEM CHINA MOBILE CHINA TELECOM CHINA UNICOM AND HUAWEI