現場固化管道市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測，按樹脂類型、固化方法、應用、地區和競爭情況細分，2020-2030 年

2024 年全球原位固化管道市場價值為 29.1 億美元，預計到 2030 年將達到 38.9 億美元，預測期內複合年成長率為 4.82%。

隨著基礎設施老化、城市化進程加快以及對經濟高效的管道修復需求的不斷成長，全球原位固化管道 (CIPP) 市場正呈現強勁成長勢頭。 CIPP 是一種非開挖修復方法，用於在無需開挖的情況下修復現有管道，已成為市政當局、公用事業和工業營運商尋求延長供水、污水、燃氣和工業管道使用壽命的首選解決方案。與傳統的開挖-替換方法相比，CIPP 具有顯著優勢，包括減少環境破壞、縮短安裝時間以及降低總體成本，這對於人口密集的城市地區尤其具有吸引力，因為這些地區的基礎設施更新必須在效率和最大程度減少公共不便之間取得平衡。政府對供水和污水處理網路現代化的投資推動了該市場的發展，尤其是在北美和歐洲，這些地區的基礎設施已使用數十年，亟需修復。同時，亞太地區快速的城市化和工業擴張也帶來了新的機遇，因為中國、印度和東南亞的城市面臨著對高效管道系統日益成長的需求，同時又面臨預算和環境方面的限制。

從技術角度來看，樹脂化學、內襯材料和固化方法的進步正在重塑市場模式。聚酯樹脂因其成本效益而仍是最廣泛使用的樹脂，但乙烯基酯樹脂和環氧樹脂在需要更高耐化學性和耐高溫性的應用中的佔有率正在不斷成長。蒸汽固化憑藉其久經考驗的性能和成本效益佔據市場主導地位，而紫外線固化是成長最快的領域，其安裝速度更快、能耗更低、耐用性更強，在高密度和環境敏感地區越來越具有吸引力。由於住宅和商業服務管線經常需要修復，小口徑管道（尤其是直徑不到一英尺的管道）佔據了最大的市場佔有率。同時，隨著市政當局將污水管道和輸水管道作為重點，大口徑管道的安裝也穩定成長。

關鍵市場促進因素

基礎設施老化和管道老化

主要市場挑戰

初始安裝和材料成本高

主要市場趨勢

環保和非苯乙烯樹脂的需求不斷成長

目錄

第 1 章：產品概述

第2章：研究方法

第3章：執行摘要

第4章：顧客之聲

第5章：全球原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 依樹脂類型（聚酯、玻璃纖維增強聚合物、其他）
  • 依固化方法（蒸氣固化、紫外線固化、其他）
  • 按應用（水和污水管道、天然氣管道、工業管道、其他）
  • 按地區（北美、歐洲、南美、中東和非洲、亞太地區）
• 按公司分類（2024 年）
• 市場地圖

第6章：北美原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 北美：國家分析
  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

第7章：歐洲原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 歐洲：國家分析
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙

第8章：亞太地區原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 亞太地區：國家分析
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韓國
  • 澳洲

第9章：中東和非洲原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 中東和非洲：國家分析
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
  • 南非

第10章：南美洲原位固化管道市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 南美洲：國家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥倫比亞
  • 阿根廷

第 11 章：市場動態

• 驅動程式
• 挑戰

第 12 章：市場趨勢與發展

• 合併與收購（如有）
• 產品發布（如有）
• 最新動態

第13章：公司簡介

• Aegion
• Granite Construction
• Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• SAK Construction
• Michels Corporation
• PURIS Corporation
• Per Aarsleff A/S
• Reline UV Group
• SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• IMPREG Group

第 14 章：策略建議

第15章調查會社について,免責事項

The Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market was valued at USD 2.91 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 3.89 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 4.82% during the forecast period.

The global Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) market is witnessing strong growth momentum as aging infrastructure, rising urbanization, and increasing demand for cost-effective pipeline rehabilitation continue to drive adoption worldwide. CIPP, a trenchless rehabilitation method used to repair existing pipelines without excavation, has become a preferred solution for municipalities, utilities, and industrial operators seeking to extend the life of water, sewer, gas, and industrial pipelines. Compared to traditional dig-and-replace methods, CIPP offers significant advantages including reduced environmental disruption, faster installation times, and lower overall costs, making it particularly attractive for densely populated urban regions where infrastructure renewal must balance efficiency with minimal public inconvenience. The market is supported by government investments in modernizing water and wastewater networks, especially in North America and Europe, where infrastructure is decades old and requires urgent rehabilitation. At the same time, rapid urbanization and industrial expansion in Asia-Pacific are driving new opportunities, as cities in China, India, and Southeast Asia face rising demand for efficient pipeline systems coupled with budgetary and environmental constraints.

From a technology perspective, advancements in resin chemistry, liner materials, and curing methods are reshaping market dynamics. Polyester resins remain the most widely used due to their cost-effectiveness, but vinyl ester and epoxy are gaining share in applications requiring higher chemical and temperature resistance. Steam curing dominates the market thanks to its proven performance and cost benefits, while UV curing is the fastest-growing segment, offering faster installation, lower energy use, and enhanced durability, making it increasingly attractive in high-density and environmentally sensitive areas. Small-diameter pipes, especially those under one foot, hold the largest market share as residential and commercial service lines frequently require rehabilitation. Meanwhile, large-diameter installations are also growing steadily as municipalities target sewer mains and water transmission pipelines.

Key Market Drivers

Aging Infrastructure & Pipeline Deterioration

One of the strongest market drivers for CIPP is the extensive aging infrastructure across the globe. In North America alone, more than 2.2 million miles of pipelines are in need of rehabilitation, many of which are beyond their intended lifespan. Studies show that 42% of municipal pipelines are over 50 years old, placing them at high risk of leaks, blockages, and breaks. In the United States, drinking water systems have been rated C- while wastewater systems have been rated D+, underscoring the critical condition of the underground network. Aging infrastructure is not limited to the U.S.-many European cities face similar challenges, with more than 35% of sewer systems exceeding 40 years of service life. Municipalities are increasingly adopting trenchless technologies, and about 39% of utility providers already use CIPP methods for at least part of their rehabilitation programs. Case projects demonstrate the impact: in Texas, for example, over 30,000 feet of cast-iron water mains were rehabilitated using trenchless methods, saving over USD5 million compared to open-cut replacement. These figures highlight how widespread deterioration of water, sewer, and industrial pipelines is fueling consistent global demand for CIPP as a cost-effective and less disruptive rehabilitation solution.

Key Market Challenges

High Initial Installation and Material Costs

One of the foremost challenges in the global CIPP market is the relatively high upfront cost of installation compared to traditional dig-and-replace methods. The specialized equipment, resins, and liners required for CIPP rehabilitation projects demand significant investment, making it less accessible for municipalities with limited budgets. For instance, epoxy and polyester resin prices have risen by more than 20% in recent years due to raw material supply fluctuations, directly impacting project costs. Additionally, the cost of advanced UV curing systems can exceed several hundred thousand dollars, creating barriers for small contractors. Labor is another factor, as trained technicians who can handle trenchless rehabilitation demand premium wages. Furthermore, transportation of liners and resin-impregnated materials requires controlled conditions, adding logistics expenses. While the method reduces long-term costs by minimizing excavation and restoration, the upfront financial burden discourages adoption in cost-sensitive regions. This creates a market barrier, particularly in developing countries where infrastructure rehabilitation is needed most but budgets are constrained. The long-term cost-benefit often fails to outweigh the short-term expenditure from a procurement standpoint, slowing market penetration.

Key Market Trends

Rising Demand for Eco-Friendly and Non-Styrene Resins

Sustainability concerns are driving a notable trend toward eco-friendly resins in CIPP applications. Traditional styrene-based resins are being replaced with non-styrene alternatives such as vinyl ester, silicate, and epoxy systems, which release significantly fewer VOCs during curing. For instance, non-styrene resins can cut VOC emissions by up to 90%, addressing environmental regulations and community concerns. Additionally, epoxy-based liners provide superior mechanical strength and chemical resistance, extending service life to more than 50 years in some applications. Though these alternatives are more expensive, municipalities are increasingly willing to invest in sustainable solutions to meet climate targets. The adoption of green resins is also supported by certification programs that recognize environmentally friendly construction practices. Demand for sustainable CIPP solutions is particularly high in Europe, where regulatory frameworks such as REACH and the EU Green Deal encourage the use of safer materials. This shift toward eco-friendly resins not only mitigates regulatory risks but also enhances public acceptance of trenchless rehabilitation technologies, positioning them as sustainable infrastructure solutions.

Key Market Players

• Aegion
• Granite Construction
• Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• SAK Construction
• Michels Corporation
• PURIS Corporation
• Per Aarsleff A/S
• Reline UV Group
• SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• IMPREG Group

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Resin Type:

• Polyester
• Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Curing Method:

• Steam Curing
• UV Curing
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Application:

• Water & Sewer Lines
• Gas Pipelines
• Industrial Piping
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • South Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Resin Type (Polyester, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Curing Method (Steam Curing, UV Curing, Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Application (Water & Sewer Lines, Gas Pipelines, Industrial Piping, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
• 5.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 6.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 6.2.3. By Application
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.2. Canada Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Application

7. Europe Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 7.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 7.2.3. By Application
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.2. France Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.4. Italy Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.5. Spain Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Application

8. Asia Pacific Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 8.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 8.2.3. By Application
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.2. India Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.3. Japan Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.5. Australia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Application

9. Middle East & Africa Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 9.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 9.2.3. By Application
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.2. UAE Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Application

10. South America Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 10.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 10.2.3. By Application
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends and Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Company Profiles

• 13.1. Aegion
  • 13.1.1. Business Overview
  • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.2. Granite Construction
• 13.3. Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• 13.4. SAK Construction
• 13.5. Michels Corporation
• 13.6. PURIS Corporation
• 13.7. Per Aarsleff A/S
• 13.8. Reline UV Group
• 13.9. SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• 13.10. IMPREG Group

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer