肉品形態檢測市場－全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會及預測（按品種、技術、形式、地區和競爭細分，2020-2030 年）

2024 年全球肉類品種檢測市場規模為 47.2 億美元，預計在預測期內將達到 90.7 億美元，到 2030 年的複合年成長率為 8.03%。推動全球肉類品種檢測市場成長的是食品詐欺行為的增多，尤其是品種標籤錯誤。幾起備受矚目的醜聞提高了公眾意識，並在全球範圍內加強了食品監管。歐洲食品安全局 (EFSA)、美國農業部 (USDA) 和印度食品安全與標準局 (FSSAI) 等機構已訂定更嚴格的品種識別規程，強制肉類生產商和加工商採用 PCR（聚合酶鍊式反應）和 DNA 條碼等先進檢測方法，以確保合規並維護消費者信任。

關鍵市場促進因素

食品詐欺和物種標籤錯誤日益嚴重

主要市場挑戰

測試成本高且基礎設施有限

主要市場趨勢

攜帶式和快速檢測技術的日益普及

目錄

第 1 章：產品概述

第2章：研究方法

第3章：執行摘要

第4章：顧客之聲

第5章：全球肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 依種類（牛、雞、馬、豬、羊等）
  • 按技術（聚合酶鍊式反應、酵素連結免疫吸附試驗等）
  • 按形式（生肉、熟肉和加工肉）
  • 按公司分類（2024）
  • 按地區
• 市場地圖

第6章：北美肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 北美：國家分析
  • 美國
  • 墨西哥
  • 加拿大

第7章：歐洲肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 歐洲：國家分析
  • 法國
  • 德國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙

第8章：亞太肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 亞太地區：國家分析
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 韓國
  • 日本
  • 澳洲

第9章：南美洲肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 南美洲：國家分析
  • 巴西
  • 阿根廷
  • 哥倫比亞

第10章：中東與非洲肉品形態檢測市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• MEA：國家分析
  • 南非
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國

第 11 章：市場動態

• 驅動程式
• 挑戰

第 12 章：市場趨勢與發展

• 合併與收購（如有）
• 產品發布（如有）
• 最新動態

第13章：干擾：衝突、流行病與貿易壁壘

第 14 章：波特五力分析

• 產業競爭
• 新進入者的潛力
• 供應商的力量
• 顧客的力量
• 替代產品的威脅

第 15 章：競爭格局

• VWR International LLC
• ALS Limited
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• Neogen Corporation
• LGC Science Group Ltd.
• AB Sciex LLC
• Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

第 16 章：策略建議

第17章調查會社について,免責事項

Global Meat Speciation Testing Market was valued at USD 4.72 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 9.07 billion in the forecast period with a CAGR of 8.03% through 2030. Driving growth in the global meat speciation testing market is the increasing incidence of food fraud, particularly species mislabeling. Several high-profile scandals have led to heightened public awareness and stricter food regulations worldwide. Authorities such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) have introduced more rigorous protocols for species identification, compelling meat producers and processors to adopt advanced testing methods like PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and DNA barcoding to ensure compliance and protect consumer trust.

Key Market Drivers

Escalating Food Fraud & Species Mislabeling

The rising prevalence of food fraud-particularly in meat products-continues to challenge food safety systems globally. Species mislabeling, where one type of meat is deliberately or accidentally substituted for another, has become a frequent concern. In 2024, nearly 1 in 5 food fraud cases worldwide involved animal-origin products, highlighting the scale of the issue. This is especially critical in processed or ground meat, where visual identification is impossible. As trust in food labeling diminishes, governments and companies are investing heavily in meat speciation tests to ensure transparency and prevent consumer deception.

The frequency of species mislabeling in meat has grown significantly in recent years. Between 2020 and 2023, there was a 42% increase in substitution cases in certain European markets, driven largely by economic pressures and fragmented supply chains. Many incidents involved lower-cost meats like horse or pork being sold as beef or lamb. Such practices not only mislead consumers but also carry legal, ethical, and religious implications. The spike in these incidents is driving more widespread adoption of DNA-based testing methods across supply chains to uphold accuracy and prevent brand damage.

Food companies face increasing scrutiny as consumers demand accountability and transparency in product sourcing. In one recent audit, 14% of supposedly halal-certified meat products were found to contain traces of undeclared pork DNA, raising alarm among both regulators and religious organizations. This incident underscores the critical need for rigorous testing and certification systems. With multicultural societies growing globally, compliance with religious and ethical meat standards is no longer optional but a business imperative. Advanced molecular diagnostics are becoming a frontline tool in preventing such violations and maintaining consumer trust.

Technological advancements in DNA testing have made species identification faster, more accurate, and cost-effective. Multiplex PCR systems, for example, now allow simultaneous detection of multiple meat types in a single test, with adoption rates growing across meat processing hubs. In fact, in several developed regions, demand for multiplex PCR testing has risen by over 25% since 2021, as manufacturers seek to catch both intentional and accidental adulteration. As governments tighten regulations and penalties for fraud, companies are proactively integrating meat speciation protocols into quality control processes to avoid recalls, fines, and reputational losses.

Key Market Challenges

High Testing Costs & Limited Infrastructure

High testing costs continue to pose a significant barrier to the widespread adoption of meat speciation testing, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and manufacturers in low-to-middle-income countries. Advanced molecular testing technologies like PCR, LAMP, and DNA sequencing require specialized instruments, reagents, and skilled personnel-all of which demand substantial upfront investment. The recurring cost of consumables, calibration, and maintenance further adds to the burden, making routine testing financially unviable for many. Additionally, certification requirements and third-party testing charges can increase operational expenses, especially for businesses exporting to regions with stringent import regulations. This economic pressure discourages companies from incorporating testing into their standard quality control procedures. As a result, despite the clear need for species authentication to prevent fraud and ensure compliance, many producers delay or avoid testing altogether due to concerns over return on investment.

Infrastructure limitations further exacerbate the challenge, particularly in remote or developing regions. Reliable access to electricity, refrigeration for reagents, and contamination-free laboratory environments are essential for accurate testing-yet these basic requirements remain inconsistent in several countries. Even where testing facilities exist, they may be too far from production centers, causing delays in sample transport and result turnaround. This lag undermines real-time quality assurance, increasing the risk of fraudulent or mislabelled meat reaching consumers. In some cases, lack of government-accredited labs or delays in establishing regulatory frameworks hinder companies from complying with international standards.

Key Market Trends

Growing Adoption of Portable & Rapid Testing Technologies

The shift toward portable and rapid testing technologies is transforming how meat speciation is conducted across the food supply chain. Traditional laboratory-based methods, while accurate, are time-consuming, costly, and often centralized-leading to delays in quality assurance and regulatory compliance. In contrast, portable testing tools such as LAMP (Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification), handheld PCR devices, and biosensors offer quick and reliable on-site results without the need for specialized lab infrastructure. These tools are particularly valuable for slaughterhouses, border inspection units, and decentralized processing facilities where immediate verification of species is essential. They reduce turnaround time from days to under an hour, enabling rapid decision-making and minimizing the risk of contaminated or mislabeled meat entering the market. This transition is accelerating as companies seek operational efficiency, lower testing costs, and compliance with increasingly time-sensitive food safety regulations.

The growing appeal of these rapid technologies is also linked to their adaptability and user-friendliness. New portable devices are being designed with simplified workflows, built-in data recording, and compatibility with digital traceability platforms. As a result, even non-technical staff in production settings can perform basic testing without the need for advanced training. This democratization of testing is especially beneficial in developing countries, where laboratory infrastructure may be limited or absent.

Key Market Players

• VWR International LLC
• ALS Limited
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• Neogen Corporation
• LGC Science Group Ltd.
• AB Sciex LLC
• Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

Report Scope:

In this report, Global Meat Speciation Testing market has been segmented into following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Species:

• Cow
• Chicken
• Horse
• Swine
• Sheep
• Others

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Technology:

• Polymerase Chain Reaction
• Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
• Others

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Form:

• Raw
• Cooked
• Processed Meat

Meat Speciation Testing Market, by Region:

• Asia Pacific
• China
• India
• Japan
• South Korea
• Australia
• Europe
• France
• Germany
• United Kingdom
• Italy
• Spain
• North America
• United States
• Mexico
• Canada
• South America
• Brazil
• Argentina
• Colombia
• Middle East and Africa
• South Africa
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in Global Meat Speciation Testing market.

Available Customizations:

With the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to the company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Species (Cow, Chicken, Horse, Swine, Sheep and Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Technology (Polymerase Chain Reaction, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Form (Raw, Cooked and Processed Meat)
  • 5.2.4. By Company (2024)
  • 5.2.5. By Region
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Species
  • 6.2.2. By Technology
  • 6.2.3. By Form
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 6.3.2. Mexico Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 6.3.3. Canada Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Form

7. Europe Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Species
  • 7.2.2. By Technology
  • 7.2.3. By Form
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.2. Germany Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.4. Italy Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.5. Spain Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Form

8. Asia-Pacific Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Species
  • 8.2.2. By Technology
  • 8.2.3. By Form
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.2. India Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.3. South Korea Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.4. Japan Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.5. Australia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Form

9. South America Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Species
  • 9.2.2. By Technology
  • 9.2.3. By Form
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Form

10. Middle East and Africa Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Species
  • 10.2.2. By Technology
  • 10.2.3. By Form
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 10.3.3. UAE Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Form

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Disruptions: Conflicts, Pandemics and Trade Barriers

14. Porters Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. VWR International LLC
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 15.1.3. Products & Services
  • 15.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 15.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 15.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. ALS Limited
• 15.3. Eurofins Scientific SE
• 15.4. International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• 15.5. Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• 15.6. Neogen Corporation
• 15.7. LGC Science Group Ltd.
• 15.8. AB Sciex LLC
• 15.9. Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer