溶瘤病毒治療市場 - 全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測，按病毒類型、應用、最終用戶、地區和競爭細分，2020-2030 年預測

2024 年全球溶瘤病毒治療市值為 165.7 億美元，預計到 2030 年將達到 571.5 億美元，預測期內複合年成長率為 22.92%。溶瘤病毒是一類能夠感染癌細胞並選擇性複製的病毒，導致癌細胞被破壞或引起癌細胞程序性死亡（細胞凋亡）。這些病毒經過工程改造或自然產生，表現出對腫瘤的選擇性，這意味著它們具有在癌細胞內靶向和複製同時不傷害正常健康細胞的先天能力。溶瘤病毒因其作為一種有針對性和創新性的治療方法的潛力而在癌症治療領域獲得了關注和重要性。溶瘤病毒具有感染癌細胞並在其內複製的固有偏好。這種選擇性通常是基於癌細胞和健康細胞之間的細胞因子和分子特徵的差異。一旦進入癌細胞，溶瘤病毒就會複製和繁殖。這種複製最終導致癌細胞裂解（破裂），釋放出新形成的病毒顆粒，這些病毒顆粒可以感染鄰近的癌細胞。過程持續進行，有效地將感染擴散至整個腫瘤。

正在進行的研究加深了我們對溶瘤病毒的了解，從而開發出更有效、更有針對性的治療方法。這項科學進步推動了該領域的創新。溶瘤病毒療法針對各種癌症類型的臨床試驗和實際應用的積極成果增強了人們對其療效的信心。展示患者的生存益處和改善的治療結果一直是關鍵促進因素。將溶瘤病毒療法與其他治療方式（如免疫療法或標靶療法）結合的概念已獲得關注。這種組合方法增強了獲得更好癌症治療結果的可能性。醫療專業人員、患者和公眾對溶瘤病毒療法的認知和教育不斷提高，促進了該療法的接受和採用。

主要市場促進因素

研究進展

主要市場挑戰

功效和安全問題

主要市場趨勢

多樣化的病毒平台

目錄

第 1 章：產品概述

第 2 章：研究方法

第 3 章：執行摘要

第 4 章：顧客之聲

第5章：全球溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
  • 按價值
• 市場佔有率和預測
  • 依病毒類型分類（腺病毒、單純皰疹病毒 (HSV)、麻疹病毒、呼腸孤病毒、痘苗病毒、水泡性口炎病毒 (VSV)、其他）
  • 依應用分類（實體腫瘤、血液系統惡性腫瘤）
  • 按最終用戶（醫院、癌症研究機構、生物製藥公司）
  • 按地區
  • 按公司分類（2024）
• 市場地圖

第6章：亞太地區溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 亞太地區：國家分析
  • 印度
  • 澳洲
  • 日本
  • 韓國

第 7 章：歐洲溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 按國家
• 歐洲：國家分析
  • 德國
  • 西班牙
  • 義大利
  • 英國

第 8 章：北美溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 按國家
• 北美：國家分析
  • 墨西哥
  • 加拿大

第 9 章：南美洲溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• 南美洲：國家分析
  • 阿根廷
  • 哥倫比亞

第 10 章：中東和非洲溶瘤病毒治療市場展望

• 市場規模和預測
• 市場佔有率和預測
• MEA：國家分析
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公國

第 11 章：市場動態

• 驅動程式
• 挑戰

第 12 章：市場趨勢與發展

• 最新動態
• 產品發布
• 合併與收購

第 13 章：全球溶瘤病毒治療市場：SWOT 分析

第 14 章：波特五力分析

• 產業競爭
• 新進入者的潛力
• 供應商的力量
• 顧客的力量
• 替代產品的威脅

第 15 章： 大環境分析

第 16 章：競爭格局

• Amgen Inc.
• Merck & Co., Inc.
• Oncolytics Biotech Inc
• PsiOxus Therapeutics Ltd.
• Vyriad, Inc.
• Cold Genesys Inc.
• Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
• Takara Bio Inc.
• Replimune Group Inc.
• Genelux Corporation

第 17 章：策略建議

第18章調查會社について,免責事項

Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market was valued at USD 16.57 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 57.15 billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 22.92% during the forecast period. Oncolytic viruses are a class of viruses that can infect and selectively replicate in cancer cells, leading to their destruction or causing them to undergo programmed cell death (apoptosis). These viruses are engineered or naturally occurring to exhibit a tumor-selective preference, meaning they have an innate ability to target and replicate within cancerous cells while sparing normal, healthy cells. Oncolytic viruses have gained attention and significance in the field of cancer therapy due to their potential as a targeted and innovative treatment approach. Oncolytic viruses have an inherent preference for infecting and replicating within cancer cells. This selectivity is often based on differences in cellular factors and molecular characteristics between cancer cells and healthy cells. Once inside cancer cells, oncolytic viruses replicate and multiply. This replication eventually leads to the lysis (bursting) of the cancer cell, releasing newly formed viral particles that can infect adjacent cancer cells. This process continues, effectively spreading the infection throughout the tumor.

Ongoing research has deepened our understanding of oncolytic viruses, leading to the development of more potent and targeted therapies. This scientific progress drives innovation in the field. Positive outcomes in clinical trials and real-world applications of oncolytic virus therapies for various cancer types have boosted confidence in their efficacy. Demonstrating survival benefits and improved outcomes for patients has been a key driver. The concept of combining oncolytic virus therapy with other treatment modalities, such as immunotherapies or targeted therapies, has gained traction. This combination approach enhances the potential for better cancer treatment outcomes. Increased awareness and education about oncolytic virus therapy among healthcare professionals, patients, and the public have contributed to its acceptance and adoption.

Key Market Drivers

Advancements in Research

Researchers have made significant progress in genetically engineering oncolytic viruses to enhance their tumor-selectivity and therapeutic effectiveness. This includes modifying the virus's ability to replicate in cancer cells while sparing healthy cells. Combining oncolytic virus therapy with other cancer treatments, such as immunotherapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapies, has shown promise in improving overall treatment outcomes. Researchers are exploring the best combinations and treatment sequences. Research efforts have led to the development of safer oncolytic viruses with reduced potential for off-target effects. Safety is a critical consideration in regulatory approval and clinical use. The human immune system can neutralize oncolytic viruses. Researchers are developing strategies to evade the host immune response or to enhance the immunostimulatory effects of oncolytic viruses, making them more effective in combating cancer.

Identifying biomarkers that can predict a patient's response to oncolytic virus therapy is a key area of research. This enables a more personalized approach to treatment and ensures that therapy is administered to those who are most likely to benefit. Research has led to innovations in the delivery of oncolytic viruses to tumor sites. This includes the use of nanoparticles, viral vectors, and specialized delivery vehicles to enhance the efficiency of virus delivery. While the Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) has been prominent, research has expanded to include other virus platforms, such as adenoviruses, reoviruses, and poxviruses. Exploring a variety of virus platforms broadens the scope of oncolytic virus therapy. Ongoing clinical trials have explored the use of oncolytic virus therapy in various cancer types and at different stages of disease. These trials provide valuable data on safety and efficacy, helping to refine treatment protocols.

Key Market Challenges

Efficacy and Safety Concerns

Efficacy can vary among different patients and cancer types. Not all patients respond equally to oncolytic virus therapy, and identifying predictors of response is an ongoing challenge. Tumors are biologically diverse, and this heterogeneity can affect the ability of oncolytic viruses to target and destroy cancer cells effectively. Adapting therapies to address tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. The tumor microenvironment can be immunosuppressive, hindering the immune system's response to oncolytic viruses. Strategies to overcome immunosuppression are under investigation. Ensuring that oncolytic viruses specifically target cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue is a safety concern. Reducing off-target effects and minimizing collateral damage is a research priority. Tumors can develop resistance to oncolytic virus therapy over time, limiting its long-term effectiveness. Understanding and mitigating resistance mechanisms is a complex challenge. Safety concerns arise from the potential for oncolytic viruses to cause adverse events. Balancing the need for a potent antitumor effect with acceptable safety profiles is a delicate balance.

Key Market Trends

Diverse Virus Platforms

Different virus platforms have unique mechanisms of tumor selectivity, replication kinetics, and host interactions. Researchers are studying these properties to optimize each platform for specific cancer types and patient populations. Combining different virus platforms with one another or with other cancer treatments, such as immunotherapies or targeted therapies, is a growing trend. These combinations offer the potential for enhanced therapeutic effects and expanded applications. The diversity of virus platforms allows for a more personalized approach to treatment. By selecting the most suitable virus platform based on a patient's cancer characteristics, oncolytic virus therapy can be tailored to individual needs. The use of diverse virus platforms can help overcome challenges related to resistance mechanisms that tumors may develop against a particular virus. By switching to a different virus platform, clinicians can potentially re-sensitize the tumor to therapy. Different virus platforms come with varying safety profiles. Researchers aim to identify platforms that minimize off-target effects and adverse events while maximizing antitumor effects. The choice of virus platform can influence the method of delivery, such as intratumoral injection, intravenous administration, or targeted delivery systems. These strategies are designed to enhance virus distribution and tumor penetration.

Key Market Players

• Amgen Inc.
• Merck & Co., Inc.
• Oncolytics Biotech Inc.
• PsiOxus Therapeutics Ltd.
• Vyriad, Inc.
• SillaJen Biotherapeutics
• Cold Genesys Inc.
• Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
• Takara Bio Inc.
• Replimune Group Inc.
• Genelux Corporation

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market, By Virus Type:

• Adenovirus
• Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)
• Measles Virus
• Reovirus
• Vaccinia Virus
• Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV)
• Others

Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market, By Application:

• Solid Tumors
• Hematological Malignancies

Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market, By End-User:

• Hospitals
• Cancer Research Institutes
• Biopharmaceutical Companies

Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market, By region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Japan
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Italy
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Applications
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Virus Type (Adenovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Measles Virus, Reovirus, Vaccinia Virus, Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Application (Solid Tumors, Hematological Malignancies)
  • 5.2.3. By End User (Hospitals, Cancer Research Institutes, Biopharmaceutical Companies)
  • 5.2.4. By Region
  • 5.2.5. By Company (2024)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. Asia Pacific Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Virus Type
  • 6.2.2. By Application
  • 6.2.3. By End User
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. China Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Application
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 6.3.2. India Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Application
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 6.3.3. Australia Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Application
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 6.3.4. Japan Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 6.3.4.2.2. By Application
      • 6.3.4.2.3. By End User
  • 6.3.5. South Korea Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 6.3.5.2.2. By Application
      • 6.3.5.2.3. By End User

7. Europe Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Virus Type
  • 7.2.2. By Application
  • 7.2.3. By End User
• 7.2.4 By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Application
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.2. Germany Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Application
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.3. Spain Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Application
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.4. Italy Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Application
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.5. United Kingdom Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Application
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By End User

8. North America Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Virus Type
  • 8.2.2. By Application
  • 8.2.3. By End User
• 8.2.4 By Country
• 8.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. United States Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Application
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.2. Mexico Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Application
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.3. Canada Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Application
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By End User

9. South America Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Virus Type
  • 9.2.2. By Application
  • 9.2.3. By End User
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Application
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Application
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Application
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By End User

10. Middle East and Africa Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Virus Type
  • 10.2.2. By Application
  • 10.2.3. By End User
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Application
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Application
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 10.3.3. UAE Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Virus Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Application
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Recent Developments
• 12.2. Product Launches
• 12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions

13. Global Oncolytic Virus Therapy Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Product

15. PESTLE Analysis

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Amgen Inc.
  • 16.1.1. Business Overview
  • 16.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 16.1.3. Products & Services
  • 16.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 16.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 16.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 16.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 16.2. Merck & Co., Inc.
• 16.3. Oncolytics Biotech Inc
• 16.4. PsiOxus Therapeutics Ltd.
• 16.5. Vyriad, Inc.
• 16.6. Cold Genesys Inc.
• 16.7. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
• 16.8. Takara Bio Inc.
• 16.9. Replimune Group Inc.
• 16.10. Genelux Corporation

17. Strategic Recommendations

18. About Us & Disclaimer