查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1865477

全球資源民族主義市場：未來預測（至2032年）－依資源類型、政策類型、相關人員群體、風險等級、最終使用者和地區進行分析

Resource Nationalism Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Resource Type, Policy Type, Stakeholder Group, Risk Level, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的一項研究，全球資源民族主義市場預計到 2025 年價值 31 億美元，預計到 2032 年將達到 42 億美元，在預測期內以 4.2% 的複合年成長率成長。

資源民族主義是指政府加強對本國自然資源控制的政策方針，通常將國家利益置於外國投資之上。這可能包括提高資源計劃的稅收、特許權使用費和所有權比例，限制出口，以及強制要求在當地進行加工和就業。資源民族主義在採礦、石油和天然氣等行業尤為突出，其目標是最大限度地為東道國謀取經濟利益，尤其是在大宗商品繁榮時期。雖然資源民族主義能夠促進國內發展，但也可能阻礙外國投資，擾亂全球供應鏈。隨著綠色和數位技術對關鍵礦產的需求不斷成長，這一趨勢正在加劇。

自然資源策略管理

自然資源的策略控制是市場中資源民族主義的關鍵促進因素。各國政府正加強對國內資源的控制，以確保經濟主權並最大化國家利益。這包括提高特許權使用費、強製本地加工以及增加國家對資源開採活動的參與。這些政策旨在將更多價值留在國內，尤其是在大宗商品繁榮時期。隨著全球對關鍵礦產資源的競爭日益激烈，各國正將資源控制置於優先地位，以支持工業成長、能源安全和地緣政治影響力。

外國投資下降

外國投資減少是資源民族主義市場面臨的一大阻礙因素。諸如提高稅收、限制所有權和出口管制等政策可能會阻礙國際公司在資源豐富的地區進行投資。投資者可能擔憂政治風險增加、監管不確定性以及盈利下降。這可能會延緩計劃開發、減少資本流入並阻礙技術進步。儘管資源民族主義旨在促進國內利益，但在國家管控和投資者信心之間取得平衡對於維持長期成長和國際競爭力至關重要。

地緣政治緊張局勢

地緣政治緊張局勢為資源民族主義市場帶來了巨大的機會。隨著全球競爭加劇和供應鏈中斷，各國正在重新評估對外國資源的依賴。對國防、能源和科技領域至關重要的戰略礦產日益被視為國家安全資產。這種轉變促使各國政府主張所有權、限制出口並優先發展國內加工。尤其是在對綠色和數位技術的需求不斷成長的情況下，資源民族主義為增強經濟韌性和地緣政治影響力提供了一種途徑。

營運效率低下

營運效率低對資源民族主義市場構成重大威脅。政府干涉增加可能導致資源計劃出現官僚主義拖延、管理不善和生產力下降。在基礎設施不足的情況下要求本地招聘和加工會對營運造成壓力。此外，國營企業可能缺乏私人企業的彈性和專業知識，進而影響其競爭力。這些效率低下會導致產量下降、成本上升和供應鏈中斷，阻礙市場成長。

新冠疫情的影響：

新冠疫情暴露了全球供應鏈的脆弱性，並凸顯了國內資源管理的重要性，從而擾亂了市場。封鎖和貿易限制措施凸顯了對外依賴的風險，促使各國政府優先考慮國家利益。資源豐富的國家重新評估了其出口政策和所有權結構，以維護經濟穩定。儘管危機期間投資放緩，但疫情加速了向戰略自主的轉變。在後疫情時代，隨著各國尋求確保關鍵礦產資源以促進經濟復甦和增強韌性，資源民族主義正在抬頭。

預計在預測期內，採礦業將佔據最大的市場佔有率。

預計在預測期內，採礦業將佔據最大的市場佔有率。採礦業是國民經濟的核心組成部分，尤其是在資源豐富的國家，因此也是政策介入的重點目標。各國政府正尋求透過提高礦產資源使用費、強制要求本地選礦以及確立對採礦作業的所有權來獲取更多價值。該行業在為綠色技術提供關鍵礦物方面發揮的作用，進一步提升了其戰略重要性。在需求不斷成長的背景下，採礦業仍然是資源民族主義努力的焦點。

預計在預測期內，礦產和金屬產業將實現最高的複合年成長率。

預計在預測期內，礦產和金屬產業將實現最高成長率。這主要得益於全球對清潔能源和數位基礎設施的大力投入，從而推動了對鋰、鈷、稀土元素和其他戰略礦產的需求激增。各國政府正優先管理這些資源，以支持國內產業發展並降低對外依賴。採礦和加工技術的創新，以及日益加劇的地緣政治緊張局勢，都在推動這一成長。該行業在未來技術中的重要性，也是資源民族主義日益抬頭的主要驅動力。

佔比最大的地區：

由於亞太地區擁有豐富的自然資源、不斷成長的工業基礎和積極的政策框架，預計該地區將在預測期內主導市場並保持最大佔有率。中國、印尼和印度等國已採取措施，例如限制出口和強製本地加工，以提高資源開採的價值。對關鍵礦產日益成長的需求和能源安全的擔憂進一步推動了這一趨勢。對資源管理的策略性關注已使亞太地區成為全球市場的領導者。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

預計北美地區在預測期內將實現最高的複合年成長率，因為該地區日益重視獲取清潔能源和國防應用所需的關鍵礦產資源，這正在推動政策轉變。美國和加拿大正在投資國內採礦、提煉和回收利用，以減少對外國資源的依賴。立法支持、戰略夥伴關係和地緣政治緊張局勢都在推動這一成長。在全球競爭日益激烈的背景下，北美積極推動資源自主的姿態正在推動市場快速擴張。

免費客製化服務

訂閱本報告的用戶可從以下免費自訂選項中選擇一項：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他公司進行全面分析
    • 對主要企業進行SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域分類
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行市場估算、預測和複合年成長率分析（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 基於產品系列、地域覆蓋和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 引言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 分析範圍
  • 分析方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 分析方法
  • 分析材料
    • 原始研究資料
    • 二手研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章 市場趨勢分析

  • 介紹
  • 促進要素
  • 抑制因素
  • 市場機遇
  • 威脅
  • 終端用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • 新冠疫情的感染疾病

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方議價能力
  • 替代產品的威脅
  • 新參與企業的威脅
  • 公司間的競爭

第5章 全球資源民族主義市場依資源類型分類

  • 介紹
  • 石油和天然氣
  • 礦物和金屬
  • 稀土元素
  • 煤炭
  • 農產品
  • 水資源

第6章 依政策類型分類的全球資源民族主義市場

  • 介紹
  • 國有化
  • 出口限制和配額
  • 在地採購與就業政策
  • 特許權使用費和稅收改革
  • 許可證和特許經營條例
  • 外國投資限制

7. 按相關人員分類的全球資源民族主義市場

  • 介紹
  • 政府/監管機構
  • 國營企業
  • 私人公司/跨國公司
  • 投資者和金融機構
  • 產業協會

第8章：全球資源民族主義市場風險等級

  • 介紹
  • 高風險國家
  • 中度風險國家
  • 低風險國家

9. 全球資源民族主義市場（以最終用戶分類）

  • 介紹
  • 礦業
  • 可再生和清潔能源
  • 製造和供應鏈
  • 農業和糧食安全
  • 其他最終用戶

第10章 全球資源民族主義市場區域分類

  • 介紹
  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 亞太其他地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美洲
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第11章：主要趨勢

  • 合約、商業夥伴關係和合資企業
  • 企業合併（M&A）
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務拓展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第12章：公司簡介

  • Rio Tinto Group
  • BHP Group Ltd
  • Glencore PLC
  • Vale SA
  • Anglo American PLC
  • Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
  • Newmont Corporation
  • Codelco
  • Saudi Aramco
  • Petrobras
  • PetroChina Co., Ltd.
  • Gazprom PJSC
  • YPF SA
  • Ecopetrol SA
  • CNOOC Limited
Product Code: SMRC32124

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Resource Nationalism Market is accounted for $3.1 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $4.2 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 4.2% during the forecast period. Resource nationalism refers to a policy approach where governments assert greater control over natural resources within their borders, often prioritizing national interests over foreign investment. This can involve increasing taxes, royalties, or ownership stakes in resource projects, restricting exports, or mandating local processing and employment. Typically seen in sectors like mining, oil, and gas, resource nationalism aims to maximize economic benefits for the host country, especially during commodity booms. While it can promote domestic development, it may also deter foreign investment and disrupt global supply chains. The trend is growing amid rising demand for critical minerals essential to green and digital technologies.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Strategic Control of Natural Assets

Strategic control of natural assets is a key driver of the resource nationalism market. Governments are increasingly asserting authority over domestic resources to secure economic sovereignty and maximize national benefits. This includes raising royalties, mandating local processing, and increasing state participation in resource ventures. Such policies aim to retain more value within the country, especially during commodity booms. As global competition for critical minerals intensifies, nations prioritize resource control to support industrial growth, energy security, and geopolitical leverage.

Restraint:

Reduced Foreign Investment

Reduced foreign investment poses a significant restraint to the resource nationalism market. Policies that increase taxes, limit ownership, or restrict exports can deter international companies from investing in resource-rich regions. Investors may perceive heightened political risk, regulatory uncertainty, and lower returns. This can slow project development, reduce capital inflows, and hinder technological advancement. While resource nationalism aims to promote domestic interests, balancing national control with investor confidence is crucial to sustaining long-term growth and global competitiveness.

Opportunity:

Geopolitical Tensions

Geopolitical tensions present a major opportunity for the resource nationalism market. As global rivalries intensify and supply chains become more fragmented, countries are reevaluating their dependence on foreign resource control. Strategic minerals essential to defense, energy, and technology sectors are increasingly viewed as national security assets. This shift encourages governments to assert ownership, restrict exports, and prioritize domestic processing. Resource nationalism becomes a tool for economic resilience and geopolitical influence, especially amid rising demand for green and digital technologies.

Threat:

Operational Inefficiencies

Operational inefficiencies pose a notable threat to the resource nationalism market. Increased government intervention can lead to bureaucratic delays, mismanagement, and reduced productivity in resource projects. Mandating local employment or processing without adequate infrastructure may strain operations. Additionally, state-owned enterprises may lack the agility and expertise of private firms, impacting competitiveness. These inefficiencies can reduce output, inflate costs, and disrupt supply chains. Thus it hinders the growth of the market.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the market by exposing vulnerabilities in global supply chains and intensifying calls for domestic resource control. Lockdowns and trade restrictions highlighted the risks of foreign dependence, prompting governments to prioritize national interests. Resource-rich countries reevaluated export policies and ownership structures to safeguard economic stability. While investment slowed during the crisis, the pandemic accelerated the shift toward strategic autonomy. Post-COVID, resource nationalism is gaining momentum as nations seek to secure critical minerals for recovery and resilience.

The mining industry segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The mining industry segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, as mining is central to national economies, especially in resource-rich countries, making it a prime target for policy intervention. Governments are increasing royalties, mandating local beneficiation, and asserting ownership in mining ventures to capture more value. The sector's role in supplying critical minerals for green technologies further elevates its strategic importance. As demand rises, mining remains the focal point of resource nationalism efforts.

The minerals and metals segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the minerals and metals segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, due to global push for clean energy and digital infrastructure, demand for lithium, cobalt, rare earths, and other strategic minerals is surging. Governments are prioritizing control over these resources to support domestic industries and reduce foreign dependence. Innovation in extraction and processing, coupled with rising geopolitical tensions, amplifies growth. This segment's critical role in future technologies makes it a key driver of resource nationalism expansion.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share, due to region's abundant natural resources, growing industrial base, and assertive policy frameworks drive market dominance. Countries like China, Indonesia, and India are implementing measures to retain more value from resource extraction, including export restrictions and local processing mandates. Rising demand for critical minerals and energy security concerns further support this trend. Asia Pacific's strategic focus on resource control positions it as a global leader in the market.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, owing to region's increasing emphasis on securing critical minerals for clean energy and defense applications drives policy shifts. The U.S. and Canada are investing in domestic mining, refining, and recycling to reduce reliance on foreign sources. Legislative support, strategic partnerships, and geopolitical tensions accelerate growth. As global competition intensifies North America's proactive stance on resource autonomy fuels rapid expansion in the market.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Resource Nationalism Market include Rio Tinto Group, BHP Group Ltd, Glencore PLC, Vale S.A., Anglo American PLC, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Newmont Corporation, Codelco, Saudi Aramco, Petrobras, PetroChina Co., Ltd., Gazprom PJSC, YPF S.A., Ecopetrol S.A., and CNOOC Limited.

Key Developments:

In February 2025, Vale S.A. and Caterpillar Inc. have entered a five-year global framework agreement to deepen collaboration on productivity, innovation and decarbonization - including dual-fuel haul trucks, battery-electric systems and carbon-reduction strategies in Vale's mining operations.

In January 2025, Vale S.A. and GreenIron H2 AB have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to explore decarbonisation initiatives in Brazil and Sweden, including a feasibility study for a direct-reduction facility using green hydrogen and Vale supplying iron-ore agglomerates to GreenIron in Sweden.

Resource Types Covered:

  • Oil and Gas
  • Minerals and Metals
  • Rare Earth Elements
  • Coal
  • Agricultural Commodities
  • Water Resources

Policy Types Covered:

  • State Ownership and Nationalization
  • Export Controls and Quotas
  • Local Content and Employment Policies
  • Royalty and Taxation Reforms
  • Licensing and Concession Regulations
  • Foreign Investment Restrictions

Stakeholder Groups Covered:

  • Governments and Regulators
  • State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)
  • Private and Multinational Corporations
  • Investors and Financial Institutions
  • Trade and Industry Associations

Risk Levels Covered:

  • High-Risk Nations
  • Moderate-Risk Nations
  • Low-Risk Nations

End Users Covered:

  • Mining Industry
  • Renewable and Clean Energy
  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain
  • Agriculture and Food Security
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 End User Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By Resource Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Oil and Gas
  • 5.3 Minerals and Metals
  • 5.4 Rare Earth Elements
  • 5.5 Coal
  • 5.6 Agricultural Commodities
  • 5.7 Water Resources

6 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By Policy Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 State Ownership and Nationalization
  • 6.3 Export Controls and Quotas
  • 6.4 Local Content and Employment Policies
  • 6.5 Royalty and Taxation Reforms
  • 6.6 Licensing and Concession Regulations
  • 6.7 Foreign Investment Restrictions

7 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By Stakeholder Group

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Governments and Regulators
  • 7.3 State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)
  • 7.4 Private and Multinational Corporations
  • 7.5 Investors and Financial Institutions
  • 7.6 Trade and Industry Associations

8 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By Risk Level

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 High-Risk Nations
  • 8.3 Moderate-Risk Nations
  • 8.4 Low-Risk Nations

9 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By End User

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Mining Industry
  • 9.3 Renewable and Clean Energy
  • 9.4 Manufacturing and Supply Chain
  • 9.5 Agriculture and Food Security
  • 9.6 Other End Users

10 Global Resource Nationalism Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 Rio Tinto Group
  • 12.2 BHP Group Ltd
  • 12.3 Glencore PLC
  • 12.4 Vale S.A.
  • 12.5 Anglo American PLC
  • 12.6 Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
  • 12.7 Newmont Corporation
  • 12.8 Codelco
  • 12.9 Saudi Aramco
  • 12.10 Petrobras
  • 12.11 PetroChina Co., Ltd.
  • 12.12 Gazprom PJSC
  • 12.13 YPF S.A.
  • 12.14 Ecopetrol S.A.
  • 12.15 CNOOC Limited

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Resource Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Oil and Gas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Minerals and Metals (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Rare Earth Elements (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Coal (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Agricultural Commodities (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Water Resources (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Policy Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By State Ownership and Nationalization (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Export Controls and Quotas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Local Content and Employment Policies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Royalty and Taxation Reforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Licensing and Concession Regulations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Foreign Investment Restrictions (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Stakeholder Group (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Governments and Regulators (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Private and Multinational Corporations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Investors and Financial Institutions (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Trade and Industry Associations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Risk Level (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By High-Risk Nations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Moderate-Risk Nations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Low-Risk Nations (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Mining Industry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Renewable and Clean Energy (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Manufacturing and Supply Chain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Agriculture and Food Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Resource Nationalism Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.