![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1857020
全球生物多樣性審核市場:預測至2032年-按類型、服務類型、最終使用者和地區分類的分析Biodiversity Audit Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Type (Baseline Biodiversity Audits, Impact Assessment Audits, Monitoring & Compliance Audits, Restoration & Offset Audits and Other Types), Service Type, End User and By Geography |
||||||
根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據,預計 2025 年全球生物多樣性審核市場規模將達到 3.309 億美元,到 2032 年將達到 9.408 億美元,預測期內複合年成長率將達到 16.1%。
生物多樣性審核是對特定區域內物種多樣性和豐度進行系統性評估,旨在評估生態系統健康狀況和確定保育優先事項。它對植物、動物和棲息地進行編目,並識別變化、威脅和恢復機會。此類審核通常由環境專業人員進行,有助於遵守永續性法規,為土地利用規劃提供資訊,並指南生物多樣性管理策略。該過程透過提供基準數據和追蹤生物多樣性保護的進展情況,確保決策的準確性。
《工業生態學雜誌》上的一項研究發現,生物多樣性風險暴露與審核費用之間存在正相關關係。該研究使用基於對 10-K 財務報表進行文字分析的公司特定生物多樣性風險指標。
全球範圍內日益重要的指令,例如歐盟生物多樣性戰略和自然相關財務資訊揭露工作小組(TNFD)
生物多樣性審核市場的發展受到歐盟生物多樣性戰略和自然相關財務資訊揭露工作小組(TNFD)等嚴格的全球性法規的推動。這些框架要求企業評估並揭露與生物多樣性相關的風險,使審核成為一項合規要求。此外,生物多樣性指標正逐漸成為環境、社會和治理(ESG)報告的重要組成部分,促使企業採用結構化的審核通訊協定。這種轉變在生態足跡較大的行業尤其明顯,這些產業正利用生物多樣性審核來指導永續土地利用、供應鏈韌性和相關人員透明度。
缺乏統一的審核通訊協定和生物多樣性指標
儘管市場對生物多樣性審計的興趣日益濃厚,但由於缺乏標準化的審核方法和生物多樣性指標,該市場仍面臨許多挑戰。這種不統一性使得基準化分析和跨部門對比變得複雜。此外,生物多樣性審核通常需要多學科專業知識、實地調查和進階資料建模,這對中小企業而言成本可能過高。收集和解讀生態系統數據的複雜性進一步限制了擴充性,尤其是在生物多樣性專家和數位基礎設施匱乏的地區。
基礎設施、旅遊和金融等領域的成長潛力
技術創新,特別是人工智慧、遙感探測和基於環境DNA的監測技術,正在透過提高準確性和降低營運成本,徹底改變生物多樣性評估方式。這些工具能夠實現即時棲息地測繪和物種追蹤,使審核更加便捷可行。此外,企業自願承諾採取有利於環境保護的策略,正在推動相關技術的應用超越監管要求,尤其是在注重環境、社會和治理(ESG)的投資者和全球品牌中。
物種資料和棲地分佈圖不完整
不準確的評估可能導致錯誤的保護策略,並使公司面臨聲譽損害。此外,缺乏生態學嚴謹性的表面審核可能被視為「綠色清洗」,從而削弱相關人員的信任。某些地區的政治不穩定和環境政策波動可能對長期生物多樣性保護措施構成風險,並阻礙審核的進行和資金籌措。
新冠疫情對生物多樣性審核市場產生了雙重影響。一方面,由於封鎖和旅行限制,現場生態學調查被迫暫停;另一方面,疫情也提高了人們對生態系統健康和通用感染疾病風險的認知。這促使企業更加重視將生物多樣性監測納入風險管理和永續性規劃。疫情期間,遙感探測和數位化審核工具的普及加速了向高科技生物多樣性解決方案的轉型,使得即使在物理條件受限的情況下也能進行持續評估。
預計在預測期內,影響評估審核將成為最大的細分市場。
預計在預測期內,影響評估審核領域將佔據最大的市場佔有率,因為它在監管合規和生態風險評估中發揮著至關重要的作用。基礎設施、採礦和工業計劃必須進行此類審核,以便在開發開始前評估其對當地生態系統的潛在影響。它們是環境許可的基本工具,有助於相關人員制定緩解策略並與保護目標保持一致。
預計在預測期內,eDNA 和基因監測服務領域將達到最高的複合年成長率。
在預測期內,環境DNA和基因監測服務領域預計將實現最高成長率,這主要得益於無需進行物理監測或侵入性取樣即可透過環境DNA痕跡檢測物種存在的能力。這些先進技術具有高靈敏度和特異性,即使在偏遠和敏感的棲息地也能快速進行生物多樣性評估。其應用範圍涵蓋保育生物學、生態學修復和法醫學環境調查等領域。
預計在預測期內,北美將佔據最大的市場佔有率,這得益於其成熟的監管體系和強大的生態學監測機構能力。該地區受益於完善的框架,例如《瀕危物種法案》和《國家環境政策法案》,這些法案強制要求對各種開發活動進行生物多樣性評估。此外,將生物多樣性指標納入企業ESG資訊揭露正在加速各產業採用生物審核。
預計亞太地區在預測期內將呈現最高的複合年成長率,這主要受生物多樣性威脅加劇以及各國政府日益重視生態系統永續性的推動。印度、中國和印尼等國的快速都市化、森林砍伐和工業擴張,使得進行生物多樣性審核以緩解環境退化變得特別迫切。區域各國政府正在投資生態恢復計畫和生物多樣性測繪工作,而國際資金和夥伴關係則為能力建構工作提供支援。
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biodiversity Audit Market is accounted for $330.9 million in 2025 and is expected to reach $940.8 million by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 16.1% during the forecast period. Biodiversity audit is a systematic evaluation of the variety and abundance of species within a defined area, aimed at assessing ecological health and conservation priorities. It involves cataloging flora, fauna, and habitats to identify changes, threats, and opportunities for restoration. Typically conducted by environmental professionals, such audits support compliance with sustainability regulations, inform land-use planning, and guide biodiversity management strategies. The process ensures informed decision-making by providing baseline data and tracking progress over time in preserving biological diversity.
According to Journal of Industrial EcologyUsing a firm-specific biodiversity risk measure based on textual analyses of 10-K statements, researchers found a positive association between biodiversity risk exposure and audit fees, indicating that firms with higher biodiversity-related risks tend to incur greater audit costs.
Rising global mandates like the EU Biodiversity Strategy and Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD)
The biodiversity audit market is being propelled by stringent global mandates such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). These frameworks compel organizations to assess and disclose biodiversity-related risks, making audits a compliance necessity. Additionally, biodiversity metrics are becoming integral to ESG reporting, prompting corporations to adopt structured audit protocols. This shift is especially evident in sectors with high ecological footprints, where biodiversity audits are used to inform sustainable land use, supply chain resilience, and stakeholder transparency.
Absence of unified audit protocols and biodiversity metrics
Despite growing interest, the market faces challenges due to the absence of standardized audit methodologies and biodiversity indicators. This lack of uniformity complicates benchmarking and cross-sector comparisons. Moreover, biodiversity audits often require multidisciplinary expertise, field surveys, and advanced data modeling, which can be cost-prohibitive for small and mid-sized enterprises. The complexity of ecological data collection and interpretation further limits scalability, especially in regions with limited access to biodiversity specialists and digital infrastructure.
Growth potential in sectors like infrastructure, tourism, and finance
Technological innovations particularly in AI, remote sensing, and eDNA-based monitoring are revolutionizing biodiversity assessments by improving accuracy and reducing operational costs. These tools enable real-time habitat mapping and species tracking, making audits more accessible and actionable. Additionally, voluntary corporate commitments to nature-positive strategies are driving adoption beyond regulatory requirements, especially among ESG-conscious investors and global brands.
Incomplete species data and habitat mapping
Inaccurate assessments can lead to flawed conservation strategies and expose companies to reputational damage. Furthermore, superficial audits lacking ecological rigor may be perceived as greenwashing, undermining stakeholder trust. Political instability and fluctuating environmental policies in certain regions also pose risks to long-term biodiversity initiatives, potentially stalling audit adoption and funding.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a dual impact on the biodiversity audit market. While field-based ecological surveys were temporarily disrupted due to lockdowns and travel restrictions, the crisis also heightened awareness of ecosystem health and zoonotic risks. This led to increased interest in biodiversity monitoring as part of corporate risk management and sustainability planning. Remote sensing and digital audit tools gained traction during this period, enabling continued assessments despite physical constraints and accelerating the shift toward tech-enabled biodiversity solutions.
The impact assessment audits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The impact assessment audits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period owing to their indispensable role in regulatory compliance and ecological risk evaluation. These audits are mandated across infrastructure, mining, and industrial projects to assess potential impacts on local ecosystems before development begins. They serve as a foundational tool for environmental clearance, helping stakeholders identify mitigation strategies and align with conservation goals.
The eDNA & genetic monitoring services segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the eDNA & genetic monitoring services segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate driven by their ability to detect species presence through environmental DNA traces without requiring physical sightings or invasive sampling. These advanced techniques offer high sensitivity and specificity, enabling rapid biodiversity assessments even in remote or sensitive habitats. Their application is expanding across conservation biology, ecological restoration, and forensic environmental investigations.
During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share supported by a mature regulatory landscape and strong institutional capacity for ecological research. The region benefits from well-established frameworks such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, which mandate biodiversity assessments for various development activities. Additionally, the integration of biodiversity metrics into corporate ESG disclosures is accelerating audit adoption across industries.
Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR propelled by escalating biodiversity threats and increasing governmental focus on ecological sustainability. Rapid urbanization, deforestation, and industrial expansion in countries like India, China, and Indonesia have intensified the need for biodiversity audits to mitigate environmental degradation. Regional governments are investing in restoration programs and biodiversity mapping initiatives, while international funding and partnerships are supporting capacity-building efforts.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Audit Market include The Biodiversity Consultancy Ltd, NatureMetrics, EcoMetrix Solutions Group, Earthwatch Institute, IBAT Alliance, ERM (Environmental Resources Management), IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Fauna & Flora International, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), WWF Biodiversity Risk Filter, Biodiversify Ltd, EcoAct (an Atos company), Biotope, South Pole, Nature Positive, and Conservation International.
In September 2025, NatureMetrics launched new AI-powered tool to help global corporations assess nature risk across entire site portfolios". The company released "Portfolio Assessment", a first-of-its-kind dashboard feature enabling enterprises to monitor biodiversity risk across all their sites.
In July 2025, The IBAT Alliance announced that its 2024 investment in biodiversity data reached USD 2.5 million (up from USD 1.2 million in 2023). This funding supports critical global datasets: the World Database on Protected Areas, IUCN Red List, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.
In January 2025, NatureMetrics announced a successful Series B raise of US $25 million to scale its biodiversity intelligence platform, leveraging eDNA and AI technologies. The investment round was led by Just Climate, EDF Pulse Ventures and the ReOcean Fund, with existing backers participating.
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.