查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1833610

2032 年農業區塊鏈市場預測：按組件、類型、組織規模、應用、最終用戶和地區進行的全球分析

Agriculture Blockchain Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Component (Platform and Services), Type, Organization Size, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，全球農業區塊鏈市場預計在 2025 年達到 11 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 53 億美元，預測期內的複合年成長率為 25.1%。

農業區塊鏈市場利用分散式帳本技術來提高整個農業供應鏈的透明度、可追溯性和效率。其應用包括監控產品來源、減少詐欺、最佳化交易以及簡化農民、經銷商和零售商之間的支付流程。人們對食品安全、仿冒品和公平貿易行為日益成長的擔憂，正在推動區塊鏈的應用。該市場也受益於數位化、智慧合約和物聯網整合的興起。各國政府和相關企業正在探索利用區塊鏈來提高農場收入、增強監管合規性以及消費者對食品真實性和品質的信心。

據世界銀行稱，肯亞和印度的區塊鏈初步試驗提高了一些供應鏈的可追溯性，並將收穫後損失減少了 20%。

提高供應鏈透明度

區塊鏈主導的供應鏈透明度透過創建不可篡改、可靠的記錄，追蹤農產品從農場到餐桌的整個過程，從而改變農業價值鏈。這種可視性減少了生產商、加工商、經銷商和零售商之間的資訊不對稱，縮短了爭議解決時間，並縮短了召回回應時間。此外，透明的帳本能夠快速檢驗有機、公平貿易和永續性等認證，從而改善進入高階市場的管道，並增強消費者信任。可互通的平台進一步簡化了審核，並減少了出口商和監管機構的文件處理摩擦。這些優勢促進了更廣泛的商業性利益和投資者信心。

數位素養有限

儘管區塊鏈技術在營運方面具有明顯的優勢，但許多農業社群的數位素養有限，阻礙了其有效應用。許多農民不熟悉智慧型手機、數位錢包以及使用基於帳本的平台所需的簡單資料輸入程序，導致數據品質低下，參與率低。時斷時續的連接和糟糕的現場培訓加劇了這些障礙，將實施負擔轉嫁給了供應商和推廣服務。如果沒有客製化的支援和簡潔的使用者介面，試點應用程式可能會降低採用率，並導致記錄保存不一致。

政府措施和資金籌措

津貼、創新基金和研究計畫透過承擔初始成本、承保概念驗證試點計畫以及獎勵官民合作關係，降低了新興企業和小農戶的財務風險。政府主導的監管沙盒和標準化工作促進了互通性和跨境認證，促進了貿易流動和合規性。這些措施也促進了標準化，鼓勵了互通性，並吸引了那些如今需要規範透明的食品鏈的機構投資者。

網路安全風險

隨著供應鏈日益互聯互通和數據主導，網路安全風險對農業區塊鏈部署構成了重大威脅。勒索軟體、資料外洩、網路釣魚和物聯網攻擊等威脅可能會破壞原產地記錄、擾亂物流，並造成聲譽損害，從而削弱買家和消費者的信心。規模較小的農產品通常缺乏成熟的網路實踐和專用的IT資源，從而形成薄弱環節，威脅行為者可以利用這些環節擴大其對整個網路運作的影響。

COVID-19的影響：

新冠疫情揭露了農業供應鏈中原產地和物流的漏洞，加速了人們對區塊鏈解決方案的興趣。疫情的爆發促使相關人員試行分散式帳本，以實現更快的檢驗、非接觸式交易和原產地追蹤，但也凸顯了營運和財務方面的限制，導致許多舉措停留在試點階段。儘管如此，這場危機提高了相關人員的認知，並在互通性和握手流程方面累積了實務經驗，為更切合實際的分階段推廣奠定了基礎。

平台（軟體/解決方案）部分預計將成為預測期內最大的部分

平台（軟體/解決方案）領域預計將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率，因為平台將可追溯性、智慧合約自動化、物聯網整合、分析和用戶介面等必要功能打包成可部署的套件，以滿足即時的市場需求。平台透過提供API、儀表板、中介軟體和託管服務，將傳統ERP與分散式帳本連接起來，從而降低整合複雜性，從而加快相關企業的價值實現速度。成功的供應商優先考慮以農民為中心的設計、多語言引導和清晰的資料管治模式。提供合規模組、模組化定價和本地支援的平台在各個產品類型和地區的採用率正在不斷提高。

預計混合/聯盟區塊鏈部分在預測期內將以最高的複合年成長率成長。

混合/聯盟區塊鏈領域預計將在預測期內呈現最高成長率，因為這些模型在透明度與必要的隱私和管治之間取得了平衡。混合架構支援公開概念驗證，同時將商業性敏感的交易細節保存在許可帳本中，以滿足買家和監管機構的需求。聯盟管治是指產業參與者共同定義通訊協定並運作節點，從而建立共用信任並減輕對單邊控制的擔憂。此類架構降低了協調成本，實現了互通性，同時加速了整個供應鏈的標準化，使其成為多相關利益者農業生態系統的可行成長選擇。

佔比最大的地區：

在預測期內，北美預計將佔據最大的市場佔有率，這得益於其成熟的農業科技生態系統、大量的私人投資以及企業在食品和商品供應鏈中快速採用可追溯性解決方案。大型零售商和餐飲服務公司對法規合規性和品牌保證的可驗證性要求很高，這促使供應商採用區塊鏈平台。蓬勃發展的創業投資活動、活躍的標準組織、成熟的物聯網網路以及廣泛的試點部署提供了切實可行的用例，將推動該地區更廣泛的商業性。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

在預測期內，歐洲地區預計將呈現最高的複合年成長率，這得益於積極的監管、永續性報告要求以及支持數位化和綠色轉型的大量公共資金。用例和國家補貼正在鼓勵試點將區塊鏈與碳計量、認證計劃和跨境追溯框架相結合，從而創建可擴展且受政策支持的用例。消費者對符合道德標準的食品的強勁需求、成員國之間加強的追溯法規以及協作標準化工作，正在為快速採用創造肥沃的條件。公私合作降低了技術風險，並吸引了大規模的私人投資，加速了各國的部署。

免費客製化服務：

此報告的訂閱者可以使用以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他市場公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域細分
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行的市場估計、預測和複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 調查範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 次級研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 應用分析
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的影響

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方的議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭對手之間的競爭

5. 全球農業區塊鏈市場（按組成部分）

  • 平台（軟體/解決方案）
    • 核心區塊鏈平台
    • 去中心化應用程式（dApps）
  • 服務
    • 諮詢與培訓
    • 實施與整合
    • 支援和維護

6. 全球農業區塊鏈市場類型

  • 私有區塊鏈
  • 公共區塊鏈
  • 混合/聯盟區塊鏈

7. 全球農業區塊鏈市場（依組織規模）

  • 主要企業
  • 小型企業

8. 全球農業區塊鏈市場應用狀況

  • 供應鏈管理
  • 智慧合約和自動支付/結算
  • 管治,風險與合規管理
  • 農場管理以及作物和牲畜管理
  • 農業金融、保險和貸款
  • 土地所有權和登記

9. 全球農業區塊鏈市場（以最終用戶分類）

  • 農民和生產者
  • 食品加工商和製造商
  • 零售商和經銷商
  • 政府和監管機構

第 10 章：全球農業區塊鏈市場（按地區）

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第11章 重大進展

  • 協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
  • 收購與合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第 12 章：公司概況

  • IBM（IBM Food Trust）
  • TE-FOOD
  • Ripe.io
  • AgriDigital
  • GrainChain
  • Ambrosus
  • Bext360
  • Provenance
  • OriginTrail
  • BanQu
  • AgriLedger
  • TraceX Technologies
  • AgUnity
  • Skuchain
  • ChainPoint（now part of Source Intelligence）
  • FoodLogiQ
Product Code: SMRC31443

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Agriculture Blockchain Market is accounted for $1.1 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $5.3 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 25.1% during the forecast period. The Agriculture Blockchain Market leverages distributed ledger technology to enhance transparency, traceability, and efficiency across agricultural supply chains. Applications include monitoring product origin, reducing fraud, optimizing trade, and streamlining payments between farmers, distributors, and retailers. Increasing concerns over food safety, counterfeit products, and fair trade practices are fueling blockchain adoption. The market also benefits from rising digitalization, smart contracts, and IoT integration. Governments and agribusinesses are exploring blockchain to improve farmer income, regulatory compliance, and consumer trust in food authenticity and quality.

According to the World Bank, blockchain pilots in Kenya and India have improved traceability and reduced post-harvest losses by 20% in select supply chains.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Enhanced Supply Chain Transparency

Blockchain-driven supply chain transparency transforms agricultural value chains by creating immutable provenance records that trace produce from farm to fork. This visibility reduces informational asymmetry among growers, processors, distributors, and retailers, cutting dispute-resolution time and shortening recall responses. Moreover, transparent ledgers enable rapid verification of certifications such as organic, fair-trade, and sustainability claims, improving access to premium markets and strengthening consumer trust. Interoperable platforms further streamline audits and reduce documentation friction for exporters and regulators. These gains drive broader commercial interest and investor confidence.

Restraint:

Limited Digital Literacy

Limited digital literacy across many farming communities constrains effective blockchain adoption despite clear operational benefits. Many producers lack familiarity with smartphones, digital wallets, and simple data-entry procedures required to use ledger-based platforms, which reduces data quality and participation. Intermittent connectivity and scarce local training amplify these hurdles and shift onboarding burdens onto vendors and extension services. Without tailored support and simple user interfaces, pilots risk low retention and inconsistent records.

Opportunity:

Government Initiatives and Funding

Grants, innovation funds, and research programmes defray upfront costs, underwrite proof-of-concept pilots, and incentivise public-private partnerships that reduce financial risk for startups and smallholders. Regulatory sandboxes and standards work promoted by governments accelerate interoperability and cross-border certification, smoothing trade flows and compliance. Such instruments also foster standardisation, encourage interoperability, and attract institutional investors seeking regulated, transparent food chains today.

Threat:

Cybersecurity Risks

Cybersecurity risks pose a material threat to agriculture blockchain deployments as supply chains become increasingly connected and data-driven. Threats such as ransomware, data breaches, phishing, and IoT exploitation can corrupt provenance records, disrupt logistics, and inflict reputational damage that erodes buyer and consumer confidence. Smaller agribusinesses often lack mature cyber practices and dedicated IT resources, creating weak links that threat actors can exploit to amplify operational impacts across networks.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated interest in blockchain solutions by exposing fragilities in provenance and logistics across agricultural supply chains. Disruptions pushed stakeholders to pilot distributed ledgers for faster verification, contactless transactions, and origin tracing, while also highlighting operational and funding constraints that kept many initiatives at pilot stage. Nonetheless, the crisis increased stakeholder awareness, produced practical lessons about interoperability and handshake processes, and informed more pragmatic phased deployments.

The platform (Software/Solutions) segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The platform (Software/Solutions) segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because platforms package required capabilities traceability, smart-contract automation, IoT integration, analytics, and user interfaces into deployable suites that meet immediate market needs. Platforms reduce integration complexity by providing APIs, dashboards, middleware, and managed services that connect legacy ERPs with distributed ledgers, accelerating time-to-value for agribusinesses. Successful vendors prioritise farmer-centric design, multilingual onboarding, and clear data-governance models. Platforms that offer compliance modules, modular pricing, and local support expand adoption across commodity types and regions.

The hybrid/consortium blockchain segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the hybrid/consortium blockchain segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate because these models reconcile transparency with necessary privacy and governance. Hybrid architectures allow public proof of provenance while keeping commercially sensitive transactional details on permissioned ledgers, meeting buyer and regulatory needs. Consortium governance, where industry participants jointly define protocols and operate nodes, build shared trust and reduces unilateral control concerns. Such structures lower coordination costs and accelerates standards across supply chains while enabling interoperability, making them a pragmatic growth choice for multi-stakeholder agricultural ecosystems.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share owing to a mature agri-tech ecosystem, deep private investment, and rapid enterprise adoption of traceability solutions across food and commodity supply chains. Large retailers and foodservice companies demand provenance for regulatory compliance and brand assurance, prompting suppliers to implement blockchain-enabled platforms. Vigorous venture capital activity, active standards organisations, established IoT networks, and extensive pilot deployments provide practical use cases that encourage wider commercial uptake in the region.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Europe region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR driven by proactive regulation, sustainability reporting mandates, and substantial public funding that supports digital and green transitions. EU programmes and national grants incentivise pilots linking blockchain to carbon accounting, certification schemes, and cross-border traceability frameworks, creating policy-backed use cases that can scale. Strong consumer demand for ethically sourced food, tightening traceability rules across member states, and cooperative standardisation efforts create fertile conditions for rapid uptake. Public-private collaborations reduce technical risk and attract private investment at scale, thereby accelerating deployments among nations.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Agriculture Blockchain Market include IBM (IBM Food Trust), TE-FOOD, Ripe.io, AgriDigital, GrainChain, Ambrosus, Bext360, Provenance, OriginTrail, BanQu, AgriLedger, TraceX Technologies, AgUnity, Skuchain, ChainPoint (now part of Source Intelligence), and FoodLogiQ.

Key Developments:

In September 2024, they expanded their partnership with THG Beauty (LOOKFANTASTIC, Dermstore brands) to integrate their platform for verified sustainability claims.

In February 2024, BanQu announced that they had secured a EU patent allowing their blockchain platform to encrypt and store identity information (farmers, waste collectors, etc.) and asset transaction data.

In September 2023, IBM and iFoodDS publicly launched "iFoodDS Trace Exchange with IBM Food Trust", intended to help food companies comply with the FDA's FSMA 204 traceability rule by combining IBM's blockchain network with iFoodDS's traceability applications.

Components Covered:

  • Platform (Software/Solutions)
  • Services

Types Covered:

  • Private Blockchain
  • Public Blockchain
  • Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain

Organization Sizes Covered:

  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)

Applications Covered:

  • Supply Chain Management
  • Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements
  • Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management
  • Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management
  • Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending
  • Land Ownership and Registry

End Users Covered:

  • Farmers and Producers
  • Food Processors and Manufacturers
  • Retailers and Distributors
  • Government and Regulatory Bodies

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Platform (Software/Solutions)
    • 5.2.1 Core Blockchain Platforms
    • 5.2.2 Decentralized Applications (dApps)
  • 5.3 Services
    • 5.3.1 Consulting and Training
    • 5.3.2 Implementation and Integration
    • 5.3.3 Support and Maintenance

6 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Private Blockchain
  • 6.3 Public Blockchain
  • 6.4 Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain

7 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Organization Size

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Large Enterprises
  • 7.3 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)

8 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Application

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Supply Chain Management
  • 8.3 Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements
  • 8.4 Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management
  • 8.5 Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management
  • 8.6 Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending
  • 8.7 Land Ownership and Registry

9 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By End User

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Farmers and Producers
  • 9.3 Food Processors and Manufacturers
  • 9.4 Retailers and Distributors
  • 9.5 Government and Regulatory Bodies

10 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 IBM (IBM Food Trust)
  • 12.2 TE-FOOD
  • 12.3 Ripe.io
  • 12.4 AgriDigital
  • 12.5 GrainChain
  • 12.6 Ambrosus
  • 12.7 Bext360
  • 12.8 Provenance
  • 12.9 OriginTrail
  • 12.10 BanQu
  • 12.11 AgriLedger
  • 12.12 TraceX Technologies
  • 12.13 AgUnity
  • 12.14 Skuchain
  • 12.15 ChainPoint (now part of Source Intelligence)
  • 12.16 FoodLogiQ

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Platform (Software/Solutions) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Core Blockchain Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Decentralized Applications (dApps) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Consulting and Training (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Implementation and Integration (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Support and Maintenance (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Private Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Public Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Organization Size (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Large Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Supply Chain Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Land Ownership and Registry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Farmers and Producers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Food Processors and Manufacturers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Retailers and Distributors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Government and Regulatory Bodies (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.