查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1818058

全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場：預測至2032年－依產品類型、牲畜、成分、形式、銷售管道及地區進行分析

Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type (Mycotoxin Binders, Mycotoxin Modifiers, and Other Product Types), Livestock, Source, Form, Sales Channel, and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場預計在 2025 年達到 27.5 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 39.6 億美元，預測期內的複合年成長率為 5.3%。

飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑和調理劑是用於保護動物免受飼料中黴菌毒素有害影響的飼料添加劑。粘合劑將黴菌毒素困在消化道中，阻止其吸收，而改質劑則改變黴菌毒素的化學結構，以降低其毒性。透過提高飼料安全性，這些添加劑可以改善動物的健康、生長和生產力，同時最大限度地降低毒素相關風險，並有助於提高畜牧生產系統的整體效率和品質。

根據 BIOMIN 2018 年世界黴菌毒素調查，北美黴菌毒素相關風險為 73%，而 2016 年為 66%。

對優質畜產品的需求不斷增加

消費者對優質肉類、乳製品和家禽的偏好日益成長，推動了對改善動物健康和生產力的飼料添加劑的需求。黴菌毒素粘合劑越來越被視為維護飼料安全和最佳化牲畜生產性能的關鍵。隨著生產商努力滿足更嚴格的品質標準，粘合劑在防止毒素相關損失方面的作用變得越來越重要。收入水準的提高和都市化也促進了動物性蛋白質消費量的成長，尤其是在新興經濟體。這種轉變促使飼料製造商投資於支持動物福利和產量的先進配方。對可追溯、無污染食品的追求正在推動黴菌毒素緩解策略的採用。

小規模畜牧養殖戶缺乏意識

許多小規模畜牧養殖戶仍依賴傳統的飼養方式，取得科學知識、獸醫指導或現代飼料技術的管道有限。這種認知上的差距往往導致黴菌毒素控制解決方案的採用率低下，從而導致牲畜生產力下降、疾病易感性增加和經濟損失。進一步採用黴菌毒素控制解決方案面臨的挑戰包括政府推廣項目不足、培訓設施有限以及在農村和發展中地區缺乏對先進飼料安全實踐的推廣。這種認知上的缺乏減緩了市場成長，並阻礙了有效飼料安全措施的廣泛實施。

對有機和天然粘合劑的需求不斷成長

隨著飼料產業轉向永續性，天然和有機黴菌毒素粘合劑越來越受歡迎。消費者對畜牧生產中使用的投入越來越嚴格，這推動了人們對潔淨標示飼料解決方案的興趣。植物來源和礦物衍生的粘合劑是合成添加劑的強力替代品，並且符合有機認證標準。這一趨勢為平衡功效與環境相容性的粘合劑配方創新打開了大門。對天然飼料成分的監管支持也鼓勵製造商擴大其產品組合。向環保型畜牧生產的轉變為這一細分領域的成長創造了肥沃的土壤。

來自替代飼料添加劑的競爭

益生菌、酵素、有機酸和植物性物質等產品正日益被用作經濟高效的多功能解決方案，以改善牲畜健康和生產力。這些替代品通常除了能夠降低黴菌毒素水平外，還具有許多益處，例如改善腸道健康、增強營養吸收和免疫力，因此對養殖者極具吸引力。此外，生物技術和天然添加劑配方的進步正在增強其功效，這進一步威脅著傳統黴菌毒素粘合劑和調理劑的市場地位，並限制了其在競爭激烈的飼料市場中的成長潛力。

COVID-19的影響

疫情擾亂了供應鏈，減緩了飼料生產，並暫時影響了黴菌毒素粘合劑的分銷。封鎖措施減少了牲畜流動，並延遲了採購週期，尤其是在嚴格管制的地區。然而，這場危機也凸顯了飼料安全在不確定時期維護牲畜健康的重要性。酪農和家禽等重要產業仍在繼續營運，維持了對粘合劑的基本需求。隨著市場趨於穩定，對生物安全和復原力的重新關注導致人們對保護性飼料添加劑的興趣日益濃厚。最終，疫情凸顯了粘合劑在維護我們食品體系中的戰略作用。

黴菌毒素粘合劑市場預計將在預測期內成長至最大的

黴菌毒素粘合劑領域預計將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率，這得益於其在降低飼料污染風險方面的關鍵作用。它們能夠有效中和多種毒素，因此對所有牲畜品種都至關重要。越來越多的生產商將粘合劑視為預防性投資，而非被動應對措施。確保飼料安全的監管壓力也推動了其持續應用。粘合劑配方的創新正在提升其性能並擴大其應用範圍。人們對黴菌毒素相關損失的認知不斷提高，可能有助於該領域在整個預測期內保持領先地位。

預計在預測期內，間接銷售部門的複合年成長率最高。

由於飼料生產商尋求靈活的採購方式，間接銷售領域預計將在預測期內實現最高成長率。這些管道涵蓋更廣泛的地理區域，並能更有效率地服務分散的畜牧市場。數位化提高了產品透明度，簡化了訂購流程。由於間接採購的便利性和成本優勢，中小型農場越來越青睞這種採購方式。製造商和經銷商之間的策略夥伴關係正在進一步增強該通路的優勢。隨著農村連通性的改善，間接銷售預計將超越傳統的直銷模式。

佔比最大的地區：

預計亞太地區將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率，這得益於其龐大的牲畜存欄量和不斷擴張的飼料產業。中國、印度和越南等國家對動物性蛋白質的需求不斷成長，促使其對飼料安全解決方案進行投資。政府為促進牲畜健康和生產力而採取的措施也推動了粘合劑的應用。該地區農業基地的密度以及人們對黴菌毒素風險日益成長的認知，也促進了黏合劑的持續需求。當地製造商也在擴大生產以滿足國內需求，從而擴大了市場准入。

免費客製化服務

此報告的訂閱者可以選擇以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域分類
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行的市場估計、預測和複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第 2 章 簡介

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 分析範圍
  • 分析方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 分析方法
  • 分析材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 二手研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 市場機遇
  • 威脅
  • 產品分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的感染疾病

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方議價能力
  • 替代產品的威脅
  • 新參與企業的威脅
  • 企業之間的競爭

5. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（依產品種類）

  • 黴菌毒素粘合劑
    • 黏土
    • 膨潤土
    • 酵母菌細胞壁
    • 活性碳
  • 黴菌毒素調節劑
    • 酵素
    • 酵母菌
    • 細菌
  • 其他產品類型

6. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（按畜牧業）

  • 家禽
  • 水產養殖
  • 豬
  • 寵物
  • 反芻動物
  • 其他牲畜

7. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（按原始材料）

  • 有機的
  • 無機

8. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（依形式）

  • 烘乾
  • 液體

9. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（依銷售管道）

  • 直銷
  • 間接銷售

10. 全球飼料黴菌毒素粘合劑市場（按地區）

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第11章：主要趨勢

  • 合約、商業夥伴關係和合資企業
  • 企業合併（M&A）
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第12章 公司概況

  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Selko
  • BASF SE
  • Orffa Additives BV
  • Kemin Industries, Inc.
  • Anpario plc
  • Adisseo
  • EW Nutrition GmbH
  • Alltech Inc.
  • Olmix Group
  • Novus International, Inc.
  • Impextraco NV
  • Biomin GmbH
  • Perstorp Holding AB
  • Nutreco NV
Product Code: SMRC31021

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market is accounted for $2.75 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $3.96 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 5.3% during the forecast period. Feed mycotoxin binders and modifiers are feed additives used to safeguard animals from the negative impact of mycotoxins in their diets. Binders trap mycotoxins in the digestive tract, preventing absorption, while modifiers alter their chemical structure, reducing toxicity. By enhancing feed safety, these additives promote better animal health, growth, and productivity, while minimizing toxin-related risks, thereby contributing to higher efficiency and overall quality in livestock production systems.

According to the BIOMIN World Mycotoxin Survey, 2018, it has been stated that the risk associated with mycotoxin in North America was 73%, whereas in 2016 the risk was 66% for the same.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Increased demand for high-quality animal products

The growing consumer preference for premium meat, dairy, and poultry is fueling demand for feed additives that enhance animal health and productivity. Mycotoxin binders are increasingly viewed as essential for maintaining feed safety and ensuring optimal livestock performance. As producers aim to meet stricter quality standards, the role of binders in preventing toxin-related losses becomes more critical. Rising income levels and urbanization are also contributing to higher consumption of animal protein, especially in emerging economies. This shift is prompting feed manufacturers to invest in advanced formulations that support animal welfare and yield. The push for traceable, contamination-free food sources is reinforcing the adoption of mycotoxin mitigation strategies.

Restraint:

Lack of awareness among smaller livestock growers

Many small-scale farmers continue to depend on traditional feeding methods and have limited access to scientific knowledge, veterinary guidance, or modern feed technologies. This gap in awareness often results in poor adoption of mycotoxin management solutions, leading to reduced livestock productivity, higher disease susceptibility, and economic losses. Furthermore, inadequate government extension programs, limited training facilities, and insufficient promotion of advanced feed safety practices in rural and developing areas make it challenging to increase acceptance. This lack of awareness slows down the market's growth and prevents broader implementation of effective feed safety measures.

Opportunity:

Rise in demand for organic and natural binders

As the feed industry pivots toward sustainability, natural and organic mycotoxin binders are gaining traction. Consumers are increasingly scrutinizing the inputs used in animal production, driving interest in clean-label feed solutions. Plant-based and mineral-derived binders offer a compelling alternative to synthetic additives, aligning with organic certification standards. This trend is opening doors for innovation in binder formulations that balance efficacy with environmental compatibility. Regulatory support for natural feed ingredients is also encouraging manufacturers to expand their portfolios. The shift toward eco-friendly livestock production is creating fertile ground for growth in this niche.

Threat:

Competition from alternative feed additives

Products such as probiotics, enzymes, organic acids, and phytogenics are increasingly being adopted as cost-effective and multifunctional solutions for enhancing livestock health and productivity. These alternatives often provide broader benefits beyond mycotoxin mitigation, such as improving gut health, nutrient absorption, and immunity, making them attractive to farmers. Additionally, advancements in biotechnology and natural additive formulations are expanding their effectiveness, further challenging the market position of traditional mycotoxin binders and modifiers, thereby limiting their growth potential in highly competitive feed markets.

Covid-19 Impact

The pandemic disrupted supply chains and slowed feed production, temporarily affecting the distribution of mycotoxin binders. Lockdowns led to reduced livestock movement and delayed procurement cycles, especially in regions with stringent restrictions. However, the crisis also underscored the importance of feed safety in maintaining animal health during uncertain times. Essential sectors such as dairy and poultry continued operations, sustaining baseline demand for binders. As markets stabilized, renewed focus on biosecurity and resilience drove interest in protective feed additives. The pandemic ultimately highlighted the strategic role of binders in safeguarding food systems.

The mycotoxin binders segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The mycotoxin binders segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to their critical role in mitigating feed contamination risks. Their effectiveness in neutralizing a wide range of toxins makes them indispensable across livestock categories. Producers increasingly view binders as a preventive investment rather than a reactive measure. Regulatory pressure to ensure feed safety is also driving consistent uptake. Innovations in binder composition are enhancing performance and broadening applicability. With rising awareness of mycotoxin-related losses, this segment is set to maintain its lead throughout the forecast period.

The indirect sales segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the indirect sales segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, as feed producers seek flexible procurement options. These channels offer broader geographic reach and cater to fragmented livestock markets more efficiently. Digitalization is enabling better product visibility and streamlined ordering processes. Small and mid-sized farms increasingly prefer indirect sourcing due to convenience and cost advantages. Strategic partnerships between manufacturers and resellers are further boosting channel strength. As rural connectivity improves, indirect sales are poised to accelerate faster than traditional direct models.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share driven by its vast livestock population and expanding feed industry. Countries like China, India, and Vietnam are witnessing rising demand for animal protein, prompting investment in feed safety solutions. Government initiatives promoting livestock health and productivity are supporting binder adoption. The region's dense agricultural base and growing awareness of mycotoxin risks contribute to sustained demand. Local manufacturers are also scaling up production to meet domestic needs, enhancing market accessibility.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, fuelled by technological innovation and stringent regulatory standards. The region's emphasis on feed quality and traceability is encouraging adoption of advanced binder solutions. Rising demand from poultry and swine sectors, coupled with increasing organic feed production, is driving momentum. Manufacturers are leveraging R&D to develop high-performance binders tailored to regional needs. Digital platforms and robust distribution networks are enhancing market penetration.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market include Cargill Incorporated, Selko, BASF SE, Orffa Additives B.V., Kemin Industries, Inc., Anpario plc, Adisseo, EW Nutrition GmbH, Alltech Inc., Olmix Group, Novus International, Inc., Impextraco NV, Biomin GmbH, Perstorp Holding AB, and Nutreco N.V.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, Cargill announces its binding offer to acquire 100% of the operations of Mig-Plus, a family-owned company specializing in animal nutrition solutions for multiple species, primarily swine and ruminants, with a product portfolio that includes premixes, feed concentrates, and complete feeds.

In October 2020, DSM announces the completion of its acquisition of Erber Group for an enterprise value of €980 million. The transaction - which excludes two smaller units in the Erber Group - is expected to be earnings enhancing in the first year upon completion.

Product Types Covered:

  • Mycotoxin Binders
  • Mycotoxin Modifiers
  • Other Product Types

Livestock Covered:

  • Poultry
  • Aquaculture
  • Swine
  • Pets
  • Ruminants
  • Other Livestock

Sources Covered:

  • Organic
  • Inorganic

Forms Covered:

  • Dry
  • Liquid

Sales Channels Covered:

  • Direct Sales
  • Indirect Sales

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Mycotoxin Binders
    • 5.2.1 Clay
    • 5.2.2 Bentonite
    • 5.2.3 Yeast Cell Wall
    • 5.2.4 Activated Charcoal
  • 5.3 Mycotoxin Modifiers
    • 5.3.1 Enzymes
    • 5.3.2 Yeasts
    • 5.3.3 Bacteria
  • 5.4 Other Product Types

6 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Livestock

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Poultry
  • 6.3 Aquaculture
  • 6.4 Swine
  • 6.5 Pets
  • 6.6 Ruminants
  • 6.7 Other Livestock

7 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Source

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Organic
  • 7.3 Inorganic

8 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Form

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Dry
  • 8.3 Liquid

9 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Sales Channel

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Direct Sales
  • 9.3 Indirect Sales

10 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 Cargill, Incorporated
  • 12.2 Selko
  • 12.3 BASF SE
  • 12.4 Orffa Additives B.V.
  • 12.5 Kemin Industries, Inc.
  • 12.6 Anpario plc
  • 12.7 Adisseo
  • 12.8 EW Nutrition GmbH
  • 12.9 Alltech Inc.
  • 12.10 Olmix Group
  • 12.11 Novus International, Inc.
  • 12.12 Impextraco NV
  • 12.13 Biomin GmbH
  • 12.14 Perstorp Holding AB
  • 12.15 Nutreco N.V.

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Mycotoxin Binders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Clay (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Bentonite (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Yeast Cell Wall (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Activated Charcoal (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Mycotoxin Modifiers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Enzymes (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Yeasts (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Bacteria (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Other Product Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Livestock (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Poultry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Aquaculture (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Swine (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Pets (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Ruminants (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Other Livestock (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Source (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Organic (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Inorganic (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Form (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Dry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Liquid (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Sales Channel (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Direct Sales (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Indirect Sales (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.