查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1813411

2032 年農業廢棄物包裝市場預測：按材料類型、包裝類型、應用、最終用戶和地區進行的全球分析

Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Material Type, Packaging Type, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，全球農業廢棄物包裝市場預計在 2025 年達到 26.3 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 42.8 億美元，預測期內的複合年成長率為 7.2%。

農業廢棄物包裝涉及將作物殼、秸稈和其他有機產品等農業殘留物轉化為環保包裝材料。這項創新技術提供了一種可生物分解和可堆肥的傳統石油基包裝替代品，從而應對了全球塑膠廢棄物挑戰。它不僅減少了環境破壞，還透過重新利用原本未開發的生質能為農民創造了新的價值。日益增強的環保意識、日益嚴格的塑膠法規以及消費者對永續產品的日益成長的偏好，正在加速其應用。透過形成資源閉迴路並促進廢棄物價值轉化，農業廢棄物包裝在推動循環經濟、支持生態平衡和農村經濟發展方面發揮關鍵作用。

根據聯合國糧食及農業組織（FAO）的數據，全球整體每年在植物和動物生產中使用約1,250萬噸塑膠製品，其中很大一部分被廢棄物，包括用於農業投入品和產品的塑膠包裝。

日益成長的環境問題

環境永續性仍是影響農業廢棄物包裝市場的關鍵因素。傳統塑膠包裝與嚴重的生態學問題有關，包括土壤和水污染以及長期的掩埋堆積。人們對這些問題的認知不斷提高，加速了對可生物分解和可再生包裝解決方案的需求。農業廢棄物包裝完美契合這些目標，因為它將作物殘茬轉化為可自然分解的環保材料。隨著各國政府強制禁止一次性塑膠，以及消費者擁抱永續的生活方式，農業廢棄物包裝被定位為保護自然生態系統和促進更綠色未來的關鍵創新。

生產成本高

限制農業廢棄物包裝市場發展的主要障礙是相對較高的生產成本。將稻殼和秸稈等作物殘渣轉化為耐用的包裝需要先進的技術、昂貴的機械設備和專門的加工步驟。這些要求推高了整體生產成本，使得基於農業廢棄物的包裝比傳統塑膠更昂貴。對於小型生產商而言，在基礎設施和設備上進行大量投資，這給擴大業務帶來了額外的挑戰。這種成本差距往往會阻礙企業在價格為決定因素的競爭性市場中開展業務。在技​​術進步和大規模生產能夠降低成本之前，高成本仍然是廣泛應用的關鍵障礙。

增加政府支持和監管

政府的扶持政策為農業廢棄物包裝帶來了巨大的機會。全球範圍內對一次性塑膠的廣泛禁令正迫使各行各業探索可生物分解的替代品。補貼和稅收減免等財政獎勵政策使企業更容易採用基於農業廢棄物的解決方案。此外，國際社會對永續性和減碳的承諾正鼓勵各行各業優先考慮循環經濟實踐。這種有利的法規環境不僅提高了人們的環保意識，也鼓勵了對研究和基礎設施的投資。隨著世界各國政府加強環境立法，農業廢棄物包裝有望成為主流包裝選擇，並加速多個產業部門的成長。

與傳統包裝的競爭

農業廢棄物包裝市場面臨傳統包裝（尤其是塑膠包裝）主導地位的巨大威脅。塑膠具有強大的競爭優勢，因為它價格低廉、供應廣泛，並擁有成熟的供應鏈。許多公司選擇塑膠而非永續材料，是因為塑膠價格實惠，且在大規模生產中已得到驗證的可靠性。相較之下，農業廢棄物包裝仍在發展中，擴充性有限，生產成本高。如果沒有技術突破或強而有力的政策支持，很難在公平的競爭環境中競爭。這種對塑膠包裝的根深蒂固的依賴持續阻礙著環保替代品的發展，並減緩了大眾市場的普及。

COVID-19的影響

新冠疫情對農業廢棄物包裝市場的影響既有正面的一面，也有負面的一面。最初，封鎖和限制措施擾亂了原料供應，降低了勞動力運轉率，並阻礙了生產活動。這些挑戰導致生產延誤，並增加了生產商的成本。儘管有這些挫折，但疫情提振了對衛生和永續包裝的需求，尤其是在食品宅配和線上零售領域。消費者的環保意識增強，並尋求傳統塑膠的替代品。隨著經濟重新開放，政府所推行的綠色實踐政策為經濟復甦提供了支持。因此，新冠疫情加速了向永續解決方案的轉變，使農業廢棄物包裝成為一個前景光明的長期市場趨勢。

預計預測期內紙張和紙板市場規模最大

預計在預測期內，紙和紙板領域將佔據最大的市場佔有率。這種領先地位得益於其材料的永續性、可再生、耐用性、可回收性和價格實惠性，這些特性使其在各個包裝領域都獲得了廣泛的認可。研究表明，到2022年，紙和紙板將佔全球可生物分解包裝市場的約53.7%。此外，在更廣泛的永續包裝產業中，紙和紙板將佔材料消耗的大部分，到2024年將貢獻總收益的近41%。成熟的生產和回收基礎設施，加上強大的消費者接受度，將繼續鞏固其市場主導地位。

預計預測期內，袋子和小袋部分將出現最高的複合年成長率

預計袋裝和袋式包裝領域將在預測期內實現最高成長率。這一快速成長的動力源於各種農業和食品相關應用對靈活、輕巧且環保的包裝日益成長的需求。這些解決方案經濟實惠、節省空間，並能延長產品保存期限，使其成為整個供應鏈的首選。線上零售的影響力日益增強、包裝食品的消費以及永續性意識的增強，進一步加速了這些包裝的普及。與托盤、麻袋、散裝包裝和硬質包裝等成長速度較慢的替代品相比，袋裝和袋式包裝擁有明顯的成長優勢，鞏固了其作為高成長包裝領域領先地位。

佔比最大的地區：

預計歐洲地區將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率。歐洲的主導地位得益於強力的環境立法、積極的政策框架以及公眾對綠色實踐的大力支持。歐盟循環經濟行動計畫和一次性塑膠禁令等措施正在顯著推動對永續包裝材料的需求。此外，該地區還受益於完善的回收系統、對永續材料研究的大量投資以及零售商和品牌的廣泛採用。這些優勢使歐洲成為全球農業廢棄物包裝的領先地區。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

預計亞太地區在預測期內的複合年成長率最高。推動這一快速成長的因素包括強勁的經濟成長、不斷成長的城市人口以及零售和線上平台對包裝商品的需求激增。地區政府在禁止使用一次性塑膠和鼓勵使用永續替代品方面發揮關鍵作用。同時，印度和中國等國家豐富的農業廢棄物為環保包裝的生產提供了經濟實惠的投入。消費者對永續產品的偏好正在穩定成長，各行各業也大力投資綠色科技。

免費客製化服務：

此報告的訂閱者可以使用以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他市場公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域細分
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行的市場估計、預測和複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 調查範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 次級研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 應用分析
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的影響

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方的議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭對手之間的競爭

5. 全球農業廢棄物包裝市場（依材料類型）

  • 生質塑膠
  • 紙和紙板
  • 纖維素材料
  • 農業廢棄物複合材料
  • 澱粉基聚合物
  • 大麻和黃麻纖維

6. 全球農業廢棄物包裝市場（依包裝類型）

  • 袋子和小袋
  • 托盤和容器
  • 包裝和薄膜
  • 散裝包裝
  • 麻袋和內襯
  • 硬質包裝

7. 全球農業廢棄物包裝市場（依應用）

  • 肥料
  • 殺蟲劑
  • 種子和穀物
  • 新鮮農產品
  • 動物飼料
  • 堆肥和土壤改良劑
  • 農具及配件

8. 全球農業廢棄物包裝市場（依最終用戶）

  • 農民
  • 農藥公司
  • 種子生產商
  • 食品批發商
  • 農產品零售商
  • 政府和非政府組織

9. 全球農業廢棄物包裝市場（按地區）

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第10章：重大進展

  • 協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
  • 收購與合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第11章 公司概況

  • Sonoco Products Company
  • Mondi Group
  • Greif Inc.
  • 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd.
  • Amcor PLC
  • Bemis Company, Inc.
  • Packaging Corporation of America
  • LC Packaging International BV
  • Pakka Limited
  • Proampac LLC
  • Flex-Pack
  • SAFEPACK Industries Ltd.
  • Epac Holdings LLC
  • Mpacks
  • BioD Inc
Product Code: SMRC30860

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market is accounted for $2.63 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $4.28 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 7.2% during the forecast period. Agricultural waste packaging involves transforming farm residues like crop husks, stalks, and other organic by-products into eco-friendly packaging materials. This innovation addresses the global challenge of plastic waste by offering a biodegradable and compostable alternative to traditional petroleum-based packaging. Beyond reducing environmental damage, it creates new value for farmers by repurposing biomass that would otherwise go unused. Growing environmental awareness, stricter regulations on plastics and rising consumer preference for sustainable products are accelerating adoption. By closing resource loops and promoting waste-to-value practices, agricultural waste packaging plays a crucial role in advancing the circular economy while supporting both ecological balance and rural economies.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Globally, around 12.5 million tonnes of plastic products are used in plant and animal production each year, and a significant share of this becomes waste, including plastic packaging for agricultural inputs and products.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising environmental concerns

Environmental sustainability remains a critical driver shaping the agricultural waste packaging market. Traditional plastic packaging has been linked to serious ecological issues, including soil contamination, water pollution, and long-term landfill accumulation. As awareness of these problems grows, demand for biodegradable and renewable packaging solutions is accelerating. Agricultural waste packaging aligns perfectly with these goals since it transforms crop residues into eco-friendly materials that decompose naturally. With governments enforcing stricter bans on single-use plastics and consumers embracing sustainable lifestyles, agricultural waste packaging is positioned as a vital innovation for protecting natural ecosystems and promoting a greener future.

Restraint:

High production costs

A major barrier restricting the agricultural waste packaging market is its relatively high manufacturing cost. Converting crop residues like husks and stalks into durable packaging requires advanced technologies, costly machinery, and specialized treatment processes. These requirements raise overall production expenses, making agricultural waste-based packaging more expensive than conventional plastics. For small producers, the need for heavy investments in infrastructure and equipment creates additional challenges in scaling operations. This cost gap often discourages businesses operating in competitive markets where price is a deciding factor. Until technological progress and larger-scale production help reduce expenses, high costs remain a crucial obstacle to wider adoption.

Opportunity:

Increasing government support and regulations

Supportive government initiatives are unlocking major opportunities for agricultural waste packaging. With bans on single-use plastics spreading worldwide, industries are being compelled to explore biodegradable alternatives. Policies that provide financial incentives, including subsidies and tax breaks, make it easier for businesses to adopt agricultural waste-based solutions. Moreover, international commitments toward sustainability and carbon reduction are encouraging industries to prioritize circular economy practices. This favorable regulatory environment not only boosts awareness but also drives investment in research and infrastructure. As governments intensify environmental legislation, agricultural waste packaging is positioned to become a mainstream packaging choice, accelerating growth across multiple industrial sectors.

Threat:

Competition from conventional packaging

The agricultural waste packaging market faces a significant threat from the dominance of conventional packaging, particularly plastics. Plastics are inexpensive, widely available, and supported by mature supply chains, giving them a strong competitive edge. Many businesses choose plastic over sustainable options because of its affordability and proven reliability in large-scale operations. In contrast, agricultural waste packaging is still evolving, with limited scalability and higher production costs. Without technological breakthroughs or strong policy support, it struggles to compete on equal terms. This entrenched reliance on plastic packaging continues to undermine the growth of eco-friendly alternatives and slows down their mass-market adoption.

Covid-19 Impact:

COVID-19 influenced the agricultural waste packaging market in both negative and positive ways. During the early phases, lockdowns and restrictions disrupted raw material supplies, reduced workforce availability, and hampered manufacturing activities. These challenges led to production delays and increased costs for producers. Despite these setbacks, the pandemic boosted demand for hygienic and sustainable packaging, especially in food delivery and online retail. Consumers became more conscious of environmental safety and sought alternatives to conventional plastics. As economies reopened, government policies promoting green practices supported recovery. Consequently, COVID-19 accelerated the shift toward sustainable solutions, positioning agricultural waste packaging as a promising long-term market trend.

The paper & paperboard segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The paper & paperboard segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period. This leadership is driven by the material's sustainability, renewability, durability, recyclability, and affordability, which make it highly favored across various packaging sectors. Research indicates that paper and paperboard represented about 53.7% of the global biodegradable packaging market in 2022. Furthermore, in the wider sustainable packaging industry, they dominated material consumption, contributing nearly 41% of total revenue in 2024. The presence of a well-established production and recycling infrastructure, along with strong consumer acceptance, continues to strengthen their market dominance.

The bags & pouches segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the bags & pouches segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate. Their rapid growth is driven by increasing demand for flexible, lightweight, and eco-friendly packaging that serves diverse agricultural and food-related applications. These solutions are economical, space-saving, and enhance product shelf performance, making them a preferred choice across supply chains. The rising influence of online retail, packaged food consumption, and sustainability awareness further accelerates their adoption. Compared to alternatives like trays, sacks, bulk packaging, and rigid formats, which expand at more moderate rates, bags and pouches, clearly dominates in growth pace, ensuring their position as the leading high-growth rate packaging segment.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. Europe's dominance is driven by robust environmental legislation, proactive policy frameworks, and strong public support for green practices. Initiatives such as the EU Circular Economy Action Plan and bans on single-use plastics have substantially fueled demand for sustainable packaging materials. Furthermore, the region benefits from sophisticated recycle systems, significant investments in sustainable material research, and wide-scale adoption by retailers and brands. These combined strengths make Europe the leading region for agricultural waste-based packaging on a global scale.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR. Factors driving this rapid rise include strong economic growth, increasing urban populations, and booming demand for packaged goods through retail and online platforms. Regional governments are playing a key role by banning single-use plastics and incentivizing sustainable alternatives. At the same time, plentiful agricultural residues in countries like India and China provide affordable inputs for eco-friendly packaging production. Consumer preference for sustainable products is rising steadily, while industries are investing heavily in green technologies.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Agricultural Waste Packaging Market include Sonoco Products Company, Mondi Group, Greif Inc., 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd., Amcor PLC, Bemis Company, Inc., Packaging Corporation of America, LC Packaging International BV, Pakka Limited, Proampac LLC, Flex-Pack, SAFEPACK Industries Ltd., Epac Holdings LLC, Mpacks and BioD Inc.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, Greif, Inc. announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to divest its Containerboard business, including its CorrChoice sheet feeder network, in an all-cash transaction for $1.8 billion to Packaging Corporation of America. The transaction is expected to close by the end of Greif's fiscal year 2025, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals.

In December 2024, Sonoco Products Company announced it has entered into an agreement to sell its Thermoformed and Flexibles Packaging business ("TFP") to TOPPAN Holdings Inc. for approximately $1.8 billion on a cash-free and debt-free basis and subject to customary adjustments. The Transaction, which reflects the completion of the previously announced strategic review of Sonoco's TFP business, is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the first half of 2025.

In March 2024, Mondi PLC and DS Smith PLC, two United Kingdom-based paperboard and packaging producers, have disclosed reaching an agreement in principle for Mondi to acquire DS Smith. The agreement covers key financial terms of a possible all-share offer by Mondi for DS Smith, pursuant to which Mondi would acquire the entire issued and to-be-issued share capital of DS Smith, according to the companies.

Material Types Covered:

  • Bioplastics
  • Paper & Paperboard
  • Cellulose-based Materials
  • Agricultural Residue Composites
  • Starch-based Polymers
  • Hemp & Jute Fibers

Packaging Types Covered:

  • Bags & Pouches
  • Trays & Containers
  • Wraps & Films
  • Bulk Packaging
  • Sacks & Liners
  • Rigid Packaging

Applications Covered:

  • Fertilizers
  • Pesticides
  • Seeds & Grains
  • Fresh Produce
  • Animal Feed
  • Compost & Soil Amendments
  • Agri Tools & Accessories

End Users Covered:

  • Farmers
  • Agrochemical Companies
  • Seed Producers
  • Food Distributors
  • Agri Retailers
  • Government & NGOs

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Material Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Bioplastics
  • 5.3 Paper & Paperboard
  • 5.4 Cellulose-based Materials
  • 5.5 Agricultural Residue Composites
  • 5.6 Starch-based Polymers
  • 5.7 Hemp & Jute Fibers

6 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Packaging Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Bags & Pouches
  • 6.3 Trays & Containers
  • 6.4 Wraps & Films
  • 6.5 Bulk Packaging
  • 6.6 Sacks & Liners
  • 6.7 Rigid Packaging

7 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Application

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Fertilizers
  • 7.3 Pesticides
  • 7.4 Seeds & Grains
  • 7.5 Fresh Produce
  • 7.6 Animal Feed
  • 7.7 Compost & Soil Amendments
  • 7.8 Agri Tools & Accessories

8 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By End User

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Farmers
  • 8.3 Agrochemical Companies
  • 8.4 Seed Producers
  • 8.5 Food Distributors
  • 8.6 Agri Retailers
  • 8.7 Government & NGOs

9 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Geography

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 North America
    • 9.2.1 US
    • 9.2.2 Canada
    • 9.2.3 Mexico
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.2 UK
    • 9.3.3 Italy
    • 9.3.4 France
    • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 9.4 Asia Pacific
    • 9.4.1 Japan
    • 9.4.2 China
    • 9.4.3 India
    • 9.4.4 Australia
    • 9.4.5 New Zealand
    • 9.4.6 South Korea
    • 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 9.5 South America
    • 9.5.1 Argentina
    • 9.5.2 Brazil
    • 9.5.3 Chile
    • 9.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 9.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 9.6.2 UAE
    • 9.6.3 Qatar
    • 9.6.4 South Africa
    • 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

10 Key Developments

  • 10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 10.3 New Product Launch
  • 10.4 Expansions
  • 10.5 Other Key Strategies

11 Company Profiling

  • 11.1 Sonoco Products Company
  • 11.2 Mondi Group
  • 11.3 Greif Inc.
  • 11.4 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd.
  • 11.5 Amcor PLC
  • 11.6 Bemis Company, Inc.
  • 11.7 Packaging Corporation of America
  • 11.8 LC Packaging International BV
  • 11.9 Pakka Limited
  • 11.10 Proampac LLC
  • 11.11 Flex-Pack
  • 11.12 SAFEPACK Industries Ltd.
  • 11.13 Epac Holdings LLC
  • 11.14 Mpacks
  • 11.15 BioD Inc

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Material Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bioplastics (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Paper & Paperboard (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Cellulose-based Materials (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agricultural Residue Composites (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Starch-based Polymers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Hemp & Jute Fibers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Packaging Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bags & Pouches (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Trays & Containers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Wraps & Films (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bulk Packaging (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Sacks & Liners (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Rigid Packaging (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Fertilizers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Seeds & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Fresh Produce (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Animal Feed (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Compost & Soil Amendments (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agri Tools & Accessories (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agrochemical Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Seed Producers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Food Distributors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agri Retailers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Government & NGOs (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.