查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1797890

全球生物作物保護市場：2032 年預測 - 按產品類型、種類、形式、來源、作物類型、應用和地區進行分析

Biological Crop Protection Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type (Microbial Pesticides, Plant-Incorporated Protectants and Biochemical Pesticides), Type, Form, Source, Crop Type, Application and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，全球生物作物保護市場預計在 2025 年達到 85.4 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 234.2 億美元，預測期內的複合年成長率為 15.5%。

生物作物保護是指利用天然物質和生物體來控制農業中的雜草、害蟲和疾病，從而減少對化學農藥的依賴，並提高作物的健康水平。此策略使用天然植物抽取物、細菌和真菌等微生物製劑以及寄生蜂和瓢蟲等有益昆蟲。此外，生物作物保護透過增加生物多樣性並與自然生態系統協同作用，減少對環境的影響，並促進永續的農業實踐。綜合蟲害管理 (IPM) 系統對於農民在生產更安全的食品的同時維護土壤和環境健康至關重要。

根據聯合國糧食及農業組織 (FAO) 統計，全球每年因病蟲害而損失的農作物產量高達 40%，凸顯了迫切需要採取永續的病蟲害管理方法，包括生物作物保護，以加強糧食安全和環境復原力。

消費者對高品質、無殘留食品的興趣日益濃厚

現代消費者日益增強的環保和健康意識，推動了對永續生產、有機種植和無殘留食品的需求。人們對水果、蔬菜和穀物中農藥殘留的擔憂日益加劇，尤其是在大城市和出口導向市場。因此，農民面臨著在滿足這些期望的同時保持生產力的壓力。生物農作物保護產品對人體安全無毒，隨著清潔標籤食品運動的興起，它們也越來越受歡迎。此外，消費者偏好的轉變迫使農民投資生物農藥，放棄合成化學農藥，以維護消費者信任並進入高階市場。

環境敏感性和可變有效性

生物農作物保護產品在不同田間環境下的有效性差異是其最大的缺點之一。生物製藥對溫度、濕度、土壤pH值、紫外線照射和施用時間等環境變數敏感。生物農藥中使用的許多微生物在不利的環境中難以生存和定殖，尤其是在乾燥或惡劣的氣候條件下。此外，生物防治通常起效緩慢，害蟲族群的建立和根除需要時間。

有利的政府法規和支持

世界各國政府越來越認知到生物解決方案在維護環境保護、糧食安全和穩定農業收入的重要性。許多國家已經實施了激勵措施、補貼和政策變化，以鼓勵永續的投入。歐盟的「綠色新政」和「從農場到餐桌」策略旨在到2030年將化學農藥使用量減少50%，這將直接惠及生物方法。巴西的國家生物投入計畫加快了生物投入的核准，印度則為有機投入套件提供補貼。此外，這些政策變化創造的有利條件使製造商能夠擴大業務，進入新市場並投資研發。

來自人工農藥的激烈競爭

儘管環境和監管壓力日益增大，合成農藥憑藉其頻譜活性、快速起效的特性以及成熟的供應鏈，仍佔據全球作物保護市場的主導地位。化學農藥通常比生物製藥更便宜、更容易使用，且所需的技術知識更少。此外，許多需要確保作物保護的農民仍依賴大型農化公司大力推廣的合成化學物質。在監管薄弱或執法不力的市場中，合成農藥通常因其便利性和熟悉性而比生物製藥更具優勢。

COVID-19的影響：

新冠疫情對生物作物保護市場造成了多方面的影響。短期供應鏈中斷和關閉導致生物製藥的生產、分銷和使用變得困難，尤其是在依賴進口微生物菌株和製劑的地區。監管延遲和勞動力流動性受限也導致研發、產品註冊和田間試驗的延遲。然而，疫情提高了全球對食品安全、健康和永續農業的認知，激發了人們對無殘留和環保作物保護技術的興趣。由於危機凸顯了建立具有韌性的本地農業系統的重要性，因此有必要對包括生物製藥在內的永續投入提供政策支持並進行新的投資。

微生物農藥市場預計將在預測期內成為最大的市場

預計微生物農藥領域將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率。天然存在的微生物，包括細菌、真菌、病毒和原生動物，是微生物農藥的來源。這些藥劑，例如木黴菌和蘇力菌(BT)，用於針對特定的害蟲和植物疾病，同時對環境、人類和非標靶生物保持安全。由於主要農業地區的監管支持以及它們與有機農業和綜合蟲害管理 (IPM) 實踐的兼容性，微生物農藥的普及度日益提升。微生物農藥是生物作物保護產業中應用最廣泛、經濟效益最高的領域，其穩定性和功效隨著製劑和施用技術的不斷創新而不斷提升。

生物殺菌劑領域預計將在預測期內實現最高的複合年成長率

生物殺菌劑領域預計將在預測期內實現最高成長率。生物殺菌劑主要含有有益微生物，例如木黴、枯草桿菌和螢光螢光，它們針對的是導致作物病害（例如霜霉病、白粉病和枯萎病）的真菌病原體。氣候變遷相關的真菌爆發、化學殺菌劑抗藥性的日益成長以及消費者對有機蔬菜和水果的需求不斷成長，都是生物殺菌劑爆炸式成長的因素。生物殺菌劑具有抑制病害和促進土壤健康的雙重作用，使其在永續農業和綜合蟲害管理 (IPM) 實踐中廣受歡迎。

比最大的地區

預計北美將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率，這主要得益於美國，美國在使用生物解決方案（包括生物農藥）方面處於領先地位。成熟的有機農業實踐、美國環保署 (EPA) 等組織執行的嚴格農藥法規以及消費者對永續、無農藥殘留農產品的高需求是支持該地區佔據主導地位的關鍵因素。強大的研發基礎設施、微生物產品的早期商業化以及新興企業和大型農業相關企業的積極參與進一步加強了北美的市場滲透率。精密農業的技術進步、綜合蟲害管理 (IPM) 計畫的快速成長以及政府的支持政策正在進一步加強市場滲透率。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

預計亞太地區在預測期內的複合年成長率最高。有機食品需求的不斷成長、永續農業意識的不斷增強以及政府支持環保農業的項目是這一快速擴張的主要驅動力。中國、越南和印度等國家正透過補貼、有機農業計畫和無農藥殘留出口限制等方式積極推廣生物投入品的使用。該地區面臨的土壤劣化和合成農藥過度使用等嚴峻挑戰也推動了向生物替代品的轉變。受人口成長、農業活動增加以及法律規範完善的推動，生物製藥。

免費客製化服務

此報告的訂閱者可以從以下免費自訂選項中選擇一項：

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 區域分類
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家進行的市場估計、預測和複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第 2 章 簡介

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 分析範圍
  • 分析方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 分析方法
  • 分析材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 二手研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 介紹
  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 市場機會
  • 威脅
  • 產品分析
  • 應用分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的感染疾病

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方議價能力
  • 替代產品的威脅
  • 新參與企業的威脅
  • 企業之間的競爭

5. 全球生物作物保護市場（依產品類型）

  • 微生物農藥
  • 植物內含保護劑（PIPs）
  • 生化農藥

6. 全球生物作物保護市場（按類型）

  • 生物殺蟲劑
  • 生物殺菌劑
  • 生物殺線蟲劑
  • 其他類型

7. 全球生物作物保護市場（按類型）

  • 液體
  • 粉末
  • 顆粒

8. 全球生物作物保護市場（依來源）

  • 天然微生物
  • 生物來源

9. 全球生物作物保護市場（依作物類型）

  • 糧食
  • 油籽/豆類
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他作物

第10章全球生物作物保護市場（按應用）

  • 葉面噴布
  • 種子處理
  • 土壤處理
  • 其他用途

第 11 章。全球生物作物保護市場（按地區）

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第12章：主要趨勢

  • 合約、商業夥伴關係和合資企業
  • 企業合併與收購（M&A）
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第13章：公司簡介

  • Bayer AG
  • Syngenta AG
  • Novozymes A/S
  • Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • BASF SE
  • FMC Corporation
  • Corteva Agriscience
  • Adama Ltd.
  • BioWorks, Inc
  • Seipasa SA
  • Nufarm Limited
  • Andermatt Biocontrol AG
  • Valent BioSciences Corporation
  • Marrone Bio Innovations Inc.
  • BioSafe Systems LLC
Product Code: SMRC30260

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biological Crop Protection Market is accounted for $8.54 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $23.42 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 15.5% during the forecast period. Biological crop protection describes the use of natural materials and organisms to manage weeds, pests, and diseases in agriculture, resulting in healthier crops with less dependence on chemical pesticides. This strategy uses natural plant extracts, microbial agents like bacteria and fungi, and beneficial insects like parasitic wasps and ladybugs. Moreover, biological crop protection lessens the impact on the environment and promotes sustainable farming methods by boosting biodiversity and collaborating with natural ecosystems. In integrated pest management (IPM) systems, it is essential for farmers to produce safer food while preserving the health of the soil and environment.

According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), up to 40% of global crop production is lost annually due to pests and diseases, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable pest management approaches-including biological crop protection-to enhance food security and environmental resilience.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Growing customer interest in high-quality, residue-free food

Growing environmental and health consciousness among modern consumers has increased demand for food that is sustainably produced, organic, and residue-free. Particularly in metropolitan and export-oriented markets, worries about pesticide residues in fruits, vegetables, and grains have grown. Growers are therefore under pressure to maintain productivity while meeting these expectations. Because biological crop protection products are safe for human health and non-toxic, they are becoming more popular as clean-label food trends gain traction. Additionally, in order to maintain consumer trust and gain access to premium markets, producers are being pushed to invest in biological and abandon synthetic chemicals as a result of this shift in consumer preferences.

Restraint:

Environmental sensitivity and varying efficacy

The variable effectiveness of biological crop protection products in field settings is one of their biggest drawbacks. Biologicals are sensitive to environmental variables like temperature, humidity, soil pH, UV exposure, and application timing, in contrast to synthetic chemicals that frequently produce immediate and broad-spectrum effects. Numerous microorganisms utilized in biopesticides have difficulty surviving and colonizing in unfavorable environments, particularly in arid or harsh climates. Furthermore, biological controls typically work more slowly, taking longer to establish and control pest populations.

Opportunity:

Beneficial government regulations and assistance

Globally, governments are realizing more and more how crucial biological solutions are to maintaining environmental preservation, food security, and farmer income stability. Incentives, subsidies, and policy changes have been implemented by many to encourage sustainable inputs. By 2030, the EU's Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy seek to cut the use of chemical pesticides by 50%, which will directly benefit biologicals. Brazil's National Bioinputs Program is expediting bio-input approvals, and India is providing subsidies for organic input kits. Moreover, the favorable conditions created by these policy changes allow manufacturers to expand their operations, penetrate new markets, and make R&D investments.

Threat:

Strong competition from artificial agrochemicals

Synthetic agrochemicals continue to dominate the global crop protection market because of their broad-spectrum activity, fast-acting performance, and established supply chains, even in the face of mounting environmental and regulatory pressure. Compared to biological products, chemical pesticides are frequently less expensive, simpler to use, and require less technical know-how. Furthermore, many farmers who are under pressure to ensure immediate crop protection continue to turn to synthetic options, which are heavily promoted by big agrochemical companies. Due to convenience and familiarity, synthetic inputs frequently outperform biologicals in markets with lax regulations or inconsistent enforcement.

Covid-19 Impact:

The market for biological crop protection was affected in a variety of ways by the COVID-19 pandemic. Short-term supply chain interruptions and lockdowns made it more difficult to manufacture, distribute, and make biological inputs available, especially in areas that relied on imported microbial strains or formulations. Regulatory slowdowns and restricted workforce mobility also caused delays in R&D, product registrations, and field trials. However, the pandemic raised awareness of food safety, health, and sustainable agriculture around the world, which increased interest in residue-free and environmentally friendly crop protection techniques. Renewing policy support and investment in sustainable inputs, including biologicals, became necessary as a result of the crisis's emphasis on the need for resilient, regional agricultural systems.

The microbial pesticides segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The microbial pesticides segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period. Microorganisms that occur naturally, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, are the source of microbial pesticides. These substances, such as Trichoderma species and Bacillus thuringiensis (BT), are used to target particular pests or plant diseases while remaining safe for the environment, people, and non-target organisms. In addition to regulatory support in major agricultural regions, their growing popularity is fueled by their compatibility with organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices. The most widely used and financially successful sector of the biological crop protection industry is microbial pesticides, whose stability and effectiveness have been enhanced by ongoing innovation in formulation and delivery techniques.

The biofungicides segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the biofungicides segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate. The main component of biofungicides is beneficial microbes like Trichoderma, Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, which target fungal pathogens that cause crop diseases like downy mildew, powdery mildew, and Fusarium wilt. Climate change-related fungal outbreaks, growing resistance to chemical fungicides, and growing consumer demand for organic fruits and vegetables are all contributing factors to their explosive growth. The dual action of biofungicides-disease suppression and soil health enhancement-makes them popular for sustainable farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM).

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share, principally propelled by the US, which is at the forefront of the use of biological solutions, including biopesticides. Established organic farming methods, strict pesticide laws enforced by organizations such as the U.S. EPA, and high consumer demand for sustainable, residue-free produce are the main drivers of the region's dominance. A strong R&D infrastructure, early microbial product commercialization, and active involvement from both startups and large agribusiness players are additional advantages for North America. The market penetration is further enhanced by technological advancements in precision agriculture, rapid growth in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, and supportive government policies.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR. Growing demand for organic food, growing awareness of sustainable farming, and government programs supporting environmentally friendly agriculture are the main drivers of this quick expansion. Through subsidies, organic farming programs, and residue-free export regulations, nations like China, Vietnam, and India are aggressively promoting the use of bio-inputs. A move toward biological alternatives is also being prompted by the region's severe problems with soil degradation and excessive use of synthetic agrochemicals. Asia-Pacific is the region with the fastest rate of growth in the biologicals industry worldwide due to its large and growing population, increasing agricultural activity, and improving regulatory frameworks.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Biological Crop Protection Market include Bayer AG, Syngenta AG, Novozymes A/S, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., BASF SE, FMC Corporation, Corteva Agriscience, Adama Ltd., BioWorks, Inc, Seipasa S.A., Nufarm Limited, Andermatt Biocontrol AG, Valent BioSciences Corporation, Marrone Bio Innovations Inc. and BioSafe Systems LLC.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, BASF and Equinor have signed a long-term strategic agreement for the annual delivery of up to 23 terawatt hours of natural gas over a ten-year period. The contract secures a substantial share of BASF's natural gas needs in Europe. This agreement further strengthens our partnership with BASF. Natural gas not only provides energy security to Europe but also critical feedstock to European industries. I am very happy that our gas also supports BASF's efforts to reduce their carbon footprint.

In June 2025, FMC Corporation announced a strategic agreement with Corteva Agriscience that will expand FMC's fluindapyr fungicide technology in the U.S. corn and soybean markets. The collaboration between the two agricultural companies will enable more U.S. growers to combat challenging foliar diseases, such as tar spot and southern rust, with this novel fungicide active ingredient.

In March 2025, Bayer and Suzhou Puhe BioPharma Co.,Ltd announced that they have entered into a global license agreement for Puhe BioPharma's oral, small molecule PRMT5 inhibitor that selectively targets MTAP-deleted tumors. Under the agreement, Bayer obtains an exclusive worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize the MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor.

Product Types Covered:

  • Microbial Pesticides
  • Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP)
  • Biochemical Pesticides

Types Covered:

  • Bioinsecticides
  • Biofungicides
  • Bionematicides
  • Other Types

Forms Covered:

  • Liquid
  • Powder
  • Granules

Sources Covered:

  • Natural Microbial
  • Biologically Derived Compounds

Crop Types Covered:

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & pulses
  • Fruits & vegetables
  • Other Crop Types

Applications Covered:

  • Foliar Spray
  • Seed Treatment
  • Soil Treatment
  • Other Applications

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 Application Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Microbial Pesticides
  • 5.3 Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP)
  • 5.4 Biochemical Pesticides

6 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Bioinsecticides
  • 6.3 Biofungicides
  • 6.4 Bionematicides
  • 6.5 Other Types

7 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Form

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Liquid
  • 7.3 Powder
  • 7.4 Granules

8 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Source

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Natural Microbial
  • 8.3 Biologically Derived Compounds

9 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Crop Type

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Cereals & Grains
  • 9.3 Oilseeds & pulses
  • 9.4 Fruits & vegetables
  • 9.5 Other Crop Types

10 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Application

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Foliar Spray
  • 10.3 Seed Treatment
  • 10.4 Soil Treatment
  • 10.5 Other Applications

11 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 Bayer AG
  • 13.2 Syngenta AG
  • 13.3 Novozymes A/S
  • 13.4 Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 13.5 BASF SE
  • 13.6 FMC Corporation
  • 13.7 Corteva Agriscience
  • 13.8 Adama Ltd.
  • 13.9 BioWorks, Inc
  • 13.10 Seipasa S.A.
  • 13.11 Nufarm Limited
  • 13.12 Andermatt Biocontrol AG
  • 13.13 Valent BioSciences Corporation
  • 13.14 Marrone Bio Innovations Inc.
  • 13.15 BioSafe Systems LLC

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Microbial Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biochemical Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Bioinsecticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biofungicides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Bionematicides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Form (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Liquid (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Powder (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Granules (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Source (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Natural Microbial (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biologically Derived Compounds (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Crop Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Cereals & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Oilseeds & pulses (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Fruits & vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Crop Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Foliar Spray (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Seed Treatment (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Soil Treatment (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Applications (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.