封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1776708

2032 年食品追溯區塊鏈市場預測:按組件、供應商、食品產品、相關人員、部署模式、最終用戶和地區進行全球分析

Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Component, Provider, Food, Stakeholders, Deployment Mode, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據,全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場預計在 2025 年將達到 17.5 億美元,到 2032 年將達到 210.3 億美元,預測期內的複合年成長率為 42.6%。

食品溯源中的區塊鏈技術是指利用分散式帳本技術記錄、驗證和共用食品供應鏈上的資料。該技術可以即時追蹤食品從產地到加工、分銷和銷售的每個環節,確保記錄的不可篡改、安全性和透明度。每一次移動或交易都帶有時間戳,並與先前的交易關聯,從而建立不可篡改的產品歷史記錄。這可以提高食品安全性,減少欺詐,增強消費者信心,並有助於快速檢測污染源。區塊鏈為相關人員提供值得信賴的單一資訊來源,促進有效召回和食品法規合規。

對食品安全和透明度的需求日益增加

消費者要求對食品的來源、品質和加工過程提供更多保障。區塊鏈透過實現數據不可篡改和即時追蹤,確保整個供應鏈的課責。一旦發生食物中毒事件,區塊鏈技術能夠快速識別污染源,從而增強消費者、製造商和經銷商的信心。因此,企業正在迅速採用區塊鏈技術來滿足客戶需求和法律要求。

實施和營運成本高

建立區塊鏈基礎設施需要在軟體、硬體和高素質人才方面投入大量資金。中小企業通常難以承擔這些前期成本。能源消耗、系統升級和持續維護增加了營運負擔。這些高昂的費用阻礙了企業放棄現有流程。因此,市場成長放緩,可擴充性下降。

與物聯網和智慧感測器整合

這些技術確保了溫度、濕度和位置的精準監控,從而提高了透明度和產品品質。感測器數據與區塊鏈相結合,使其變得檢驗且不可解釋,從而增強了相關人員的信任。物聯網設備的自動資料輸入減少了業務效率低下和人為錯誤。這種整合可以更快地識別污染源,從而減少召回和健康風險。總體而言,它促進了食品安全法規的合規性,並提高了供應鏈的責任感。

缺乏跨區域監管標準化

企業在適應各種法律體制面臨挑戰,導致採用速度放緩。當多個地區遵循不同的資料格式和合規標準時,可能會出現互通性問題。這阻礙了全球供應鏈的透明度,並限制了跨境食品追溯。為每個國家客製化區塊鏈解決方案會為企業帶來更高的成本。整體而言,由於法規環境分散,食品追溯領域的區塊鏈市場擴充性和可靠性較低。

COVID-19的影響

新冠疫情顯著加速了區塊鏈在食品追溯領域的應用。供應鏈中斷以及人們對食品安全和透明度日益成長的擔憂,促使相關人員尋求可靠的即時追蹤解決方案。區塊鏈有助於提高可見性,並降低污染和詐欺風險。消費者對可追溯且符合道德標準的產品的需求日益成長,也推動了對區塊鏈平台的投資。儘管最初採用區塊鏈的門檻很高,但疫情最終凸顯了區塊鏈在建立具有韌性和透明度的食品供應鏈方面的價值。

預計中間件供應商細分市場在預測期內將佔據最大佔有率

預計中間件供應商細分市場將在預測期內佔據最大市場佔有率,因為它們能夠實現區塊鏈平台與現有食品供應鏈系統的無縫整合。這些提供者提供的工具有助於促進資料交換、智慧合約部署和流程自動化。這些解決方案有助於緩解農民、加工商和零售商等不同相關人員之間的互通性問題。透過確保安全即時的資料共用,中間件提高了透明度和可追溯性。這反過來又能建立消費者信任,並鼓勵區塊鏈在食品追溯領域中得到更廣泛的應用。

預計在預測期內,穀物和穀類產品部門的複合年成長率最高。

由於整個供應鏈的透明度,穀物和穀類產品預計將在預測期內實現最高成長率。區塊鏈有助於追蹤穀物的來源、品質和流動情況,從而降低詐欺和污染的風險。區塊鏈支持農民、加工商和零售商之間即時共用數據,增強信任和課責。種植方法和物流的不可篡改記錄有助於遵守法規。這將增強消費者對穀物產品的信心,並促進市場採用。

佔比最大的地區:

由於人們對食品安全的擔憂日益加劇,以及中國、印度和日本等國政府主導的舉措,預計亞太地區將在預測期內佔據最大的市場佔有率。消費者意識的提升、對透明度的需求以及食品出口的成長正在推動市場發展。新興企業和科技公司正在與農業供應鏈合作,以改善從農場到餐桌的全程追蹤。技術進步和大規模先導計畫進一步推動了該地區的成長,尤其是在水產品、乳製品和生鮮食品領域,使該地區成為快速發展的區塊鏈可追溯性中心。

複合年成長率最高的地區:

在預測期內,北美預計將呈現最高的複合年成長率,這得益於其嚴格的食品安全法規、成熟的技術基礎設施以及沃爾瑪和IBM Food Trust舉措等大型零售商的早期採用。美國在該地區處於領先地位,其重點是改善食源性疾病預防和召回管理。與亞太地區不同,該地區市場的特點是企業成熟、數位整合程度高,消費者對符合道德標準的食品有廣泛的需求。高額的研發投入、對可擴展性的追求以及肉類和家禽可追溯性方面的成功試驗,進一步鞏固了該地區的市場主導地位。

提供免費客製化:

訂閱此報告的客戶可享有以下免費自訂選項之一:

  • 公司簡介
    • 對最多三家其他市場公司進行全面分析
    • 主要企業的SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 區域細分
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家市場進行估計、預測和複合年成長率(註:基於可行性檢查)
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 根據產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 調查範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 數據分析
    • 數據檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究資料
    • 次級研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場走勢分析

  • 驅動程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19的影響

第4章 波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買家的議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭對手之間的競爭

5. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場(按組件)

  • 平台
  • 服務

6. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場(依提供者)

  • 中介軟體提供者
  • 基礎設施提供者
  • 應用程式提供者

7. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場(依食品類別)

  • 乳製品
  • 肉類和魚貝類
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 飲料
  • 糧食
  • 加工食品
  • 其他食物

8. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場相關人員

  • 生產者和農民
  • 食品製造商
  • 物流和配送
  • 零售商
  • 監管機構
  • 消費者
  • 其他相關人員

9. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場(依部署模式)

  • 本地
  • 雲端基礎

10. 全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場(依最終用戶)

  • 批發的
  • 飯店業
  • 政府機構
  • 電商平台
  • 其他最終用戶

第 11 章。按地區分類的全球食品追溯區塊鏈市場

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他歐洲國家
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東和非洲地區

第12章 重大進展

  • 協議、夥伴關係、合作和合資企業
  • 收購與合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第13章 公司概況

  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • SAP SE
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Ambrosus
  • Provenance Ltd.
  • TE-FOOD International GmbH
  • Ripe.io
  • OriginTrail
  • ZhongAn Technology
  • VeChain Foundation
  • Arc-net
  • Atea ASA
  • BlockApps Inc.
  • AgriDigital
  • Chainvine
  • FoodLogiQ
Product Code: SMRC30039

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market is accounted for $1.75 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $21.03 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 42.6% during the forecast period. Blockchain in food traceability is the process of recording, confirming, and sharing data along the food supply chain using distributed ledger technology. It makes it possible to trace food goods in real time from the point of origin through the steps of processing, distribution, and sale, guaranteeing record immutability, security, and transparency. Every movement or transaction is time-stamped and connected to the one before it, establishing an unchangeable record of the product's history. This improves food safety, lowers fraud, increases consumer trust, and aids in the prompt detection of contamination sources. Blockchain offers a single, trustworthy source of truth for all parties involved, facilitating effective recalls and adherence to food rules.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising demand for food safety and transparency

Customers are looking for more guarantees regarding the provenance, quality, and preparation of their food. Blockchain ensures accountability throughout the supply chain by enabling immutable data and real-time tracking. During outbreaks of food borne illness, it facilitates the prompt identification of contamination sources. Customers, manufacturers, and merchants all gain trust as a result. Because of this, companies are quickly implementing blockchain to satisfy customer demands and legal requirements.

Restraint:

High implementation and operational costs

It takes a significant investment in software, hardware, and qualified staff to set up blockchain infrastructure. Small and medium-sized businesses frequently find it difficult to pay for these up-front costs. The operational strain is increased by energy use, system upgrades, and ongoing maintenance. Businesses are discouraged from abandoning established processes by these exorbitant expenses. The market grows more slowly and has less scalability as a result.

Opportunity:

Integration with IoT and smart sensors

Transparency and product quality are increased by these technologies, which guarantee precise temperature, humidity, and location monitoring. Sensor data becomes verifiable and impenetrable when paired with blockchain, increasing stakeholder trust. Operational inefficiencies and human error are decreased by automated data entry from IoT devices. This integration reduces recalls and health hazards by enabling speedier identification of contaminated sources. In general, it promotes adherence to food safety laws and increases supply chain responsibility.

Threat:

Lack of regulatory standardization across regions

Adoption rates are slowed by businesses' challenges in conforming to various legal frameworks. When several regions adhere to disparate data formats and compliance standards, interoperability issues might occur. This hinders the transparency of the global supply chain and restricts the traceability of food across borders. Customising blockchain solutions for each country comes at a larger cost to businesses. In general, the market for blockchain-based food traceability is less scalable and trustworthy due to the fragmented regulatory environment.

Covid-19 Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated the adoption of blockchain in the food traceability market. Supply chain disruptions and rising concerns about food safety and transparency prompted stakeholders to seek reliable, real-time tracking solutions. Blockchain provided enhanced visibility, helping mitigate risks of contamination and fraud. Increased consumer demand for traceable and ethically sourced products also fueled investment in blockchain platforms. Despite initial implementation hurdles, the pandemic ultimately highlighted blockchain's value in building resilient and transparent food supply chains.

The middleware providers segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The middleware providers segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period by enabling seamless integration between blockchain platforms and existing food supply chain systems. These providers offer tools that facilitate data exchange, smart contract deployment, and process automation. Their solutions help reduce interoperability issues across different stakeholders like farmers, processors, and retailers. By ensuring secure and real-time data sharing, middleware enhances transparency and traceability. This, in turn, builds consumer trust and encourages broader adoption of blockchain in food traceability.

The grains & cereals segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the grains & cereals segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, due to the transparency across the entire supply chain. It helps track the origin, quality, and movement of grains, reducing fraud and contamination risks. Blockchain enables real-time data sharing among farmers, processors, and retailers, enhancing trust and accountability. Regulatory compliance becomes easier with immutable records of cultivation practices and logistics. This increases consumer confidence in grain-based products, driving market adoption.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share due to increasing concerns over food safety and government-led initiatives in countries like China, India, and Japan. Rising consumer awareness, demand for transparency, and expanding food exports drive the market. Start-ups and tech firms are collaborating with agricultural supply chains to improve tracking from farm to fork. Technological advancements and large-scale pilot projects are further accelerating growth, particularly in seafood, dairy, and fresh produce segments, positioning the region as a fast-growing blockchain traceability hub.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR by stringent food safety regulations, established tech infrastructure, and early adoption by major retailers like Walmart and IBM's Food Trust initiative. The U.S. leads the region, focusing on preventing foodborne illnesses and improving recall management. Unlike Asia Pacific, the market here is characterized by mature players, extensive digital integration, and widespread consumer demand for ethically sourced food. High investment in research, scalability efforts, and pilot success in meat and poultry traceability further contribute to the region's market dominance.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Blockchain in Food Traceability Market include IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, SAP SE, Oracle Corporation, Ambrosus, Provenance Ltd., TE-FOOD International GmbH, Ripe.io, OriginTrail, ZhongAn Technology, VeChain Foundation, Arc-net, Atea ASA, BlockApps Inc., AgriDigital, Chainvine and FoodLogiQ.

Key Developments:

In February 2025, IBM and iFoodDS launched the iFoodDS Trace Exchange with IBM Food Trust, a joint solution designed to help food companies meet the stringent requirements of the U.S. FDA's FSMA Rule 204(d) on traceability. IBM provides backend data processing and blockchain infrastructure, while iFoodDS offers applications and onboarding support. This partnership enables secure, scalable, and swift traceability, making regulatory compliance more accessible and improving food safety across the supply chain.

In October 2024, Microsoft enhanced Dynamics 365 Business Central with blockchain integration, allowing real-time, tamper-proof tracking of food products from origin to consumer. This supports verification of product authenticity and compliance with ethical sourcing standards.

In June 2024, SAP SE partnered with Unilever to pilot the GreenToken by SAP solution, enhancing traceability and transparency in Unilever's global palm oil supply chain. The pilot in Indonesia tracked over 188,000 tons of oil palm fruit, using blockchain tokens to mirror material flow and capture origin attributes. This initiative supports Unilever's goal of a deforestation-free supply chain and demonstrates SAP's commitment to sustainable sourcing.

Components Covered:

  • Platform
  • Services

Providers Covered:

  • Middleware Providers
  • Infrastructure Providers
  • Application Providers

Foods Covered:

  • Dairy Products
  • Meat and Seafood
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Beverages
  • Grains & Cereals
  • Processed Foods
  • Other Foods

Stakeholders Covered:

  • Growers and Farmers
  • Food Manufacturers
  • Logistics and Distribution
  • Retailers
  • Regulatory Bodies
  • Consumers
  • Other Stakeholders

Deployment Modes Covered:

  • On-Premise
  • Cloud-Based

End Users Covered:

  • Wholesale
  • Hospitality
  • Government Agencies
  • E-commerce Platforms
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 End User Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Platform
  • 5.3 Services

6 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Provider

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Middleware Providers
  • 6.3 Infrastructure Providers
  • 6.4 Application Providers

7 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Food

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Dairy Products
  • 7.3 Meat and Seafood
  • 7.4 Fruits & Vegetables
  • 7.5 Beverages
  • 7.6 Grains & Cereals
  • 7.7 Processed Foods
  • 7.8 Other Foods

8 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Stakeholders

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Growers and Farmers
  • 8.3 Food Manufacturers
  • 8.4 Logistics and Distribution
  • 8.5 Retailers
  • 8.6 Regulatory Bodies
  • 8.7 Consumers
  • 8.8 Other Stakeholders

9 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Deployment Mode

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 On-Premise
  • 9.3 Cloud-Based

10 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Wholesale
  • 10.3 Hospitality
  • 10.4 Government Agencies
  • 10.5 E-commerce Platforms
  • 10.6 Other End Users

11 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 IBM Corporation
  • 13.2 Microsoft Corporation
  • 13.3 SAP SE
  • 13.4 Oracle Corporation
  • 13.5 Ambrosus
  • 13.6 Provenance Ltd.
  • 13.7 TE-FOOD International GmbH
  • 13.8 Ripe.io
  • 13.9 OriginTrail
  • 13.10 ZhongAn Technology
  • 13.11 VeChain Foundation
  • 13.12 Arc-net
  • 13.13 Atea ASA
  • 13.14 BlockApps Inc.
  • 13.15 AgriDigital
  • 13.16 Chainvine
  • 13.17 FoodLogiQ

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Platform (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Provider (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Middleware Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Infrastructure Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Application Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Food (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Dairy Products (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Meat and Seafood (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Fruits & Vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Beverages (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Grains & Cereals (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Processed Foods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other Foods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Stakeholders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Growers and Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Food Manufacturers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Logistics and Distribution (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Retailers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Regulatory Bodies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Consumers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other Stakeholders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Deployment Mode (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By On-Premise (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Cloud-Based (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Wholesale (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Hospitality (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Government Agencies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By E-commerce Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.