Guidehouse Research 排行榜：電網分析供應商

本報告分析了一個對能源轉型至關重要的快速發展的市場。隨著分散式能源 (DER) 的日益普及、監管環境的不斷變化以及對先進規劃工具需求的日益增長，公用事業公司和電網運營商正面臨前所未有的挑戰，對先進電網規劃分析解決方案的需求也激增。本報告的發布尤其及時，因為新軟體平台的出現以及諸如 FERC 第 2222 號命令等監管因素正在顯著改變輸配電網路的規劃、建模和優化方式。

Guidehouse Research 的排行榜報告是一項全面的基準研究，旨在評估和排名特定技術或服務領域的領先供應商。排行榜方法論對每家公司的策略和執行情況進行了透明的比較評估，使利害關係人能夠清楚地了解競爭格局。本期報告評估了七家領先的電網分析供應商，重點介紹了它們的優勢、差異化因素和市場地位，並確定了最有希望長期成功的公司。

本排行榜上的公司排名是基於嚴格的標準，分為兩大類： "策略" 和 "執行" 。策略包括願景、市場進入策略、合作夥伴關係、技術能力和地理覆蓋範圍。執行包括銷售和行銷、產品性能、產品組合廣度、定價和可持續性。在策略和執行兩方面均表現卓越，並兼具先進技術、強大的市場影響力和穩健的商業模式的公司，將被評為 "領導者" 。這種系統化的評估方式確保排行榜不僅反映公司目前的實力，也反映其在電網規劃分析市場持續保持領先地位的潛力。

目錄

第一章：摘要整理

• 市場概覽
• 排行榜

第二章：市場概覽

• 市場定義
• 市場驅動因素
  • 分散式能源容量擴展與整合
  • 電網整合
  • 軟體演進
  • 託管容量分析與拓樸最佳化
  • 監管驅動因素
  • 尖峰需求
• 市場壁壘
  • 傳統軟體與規劃策略
  • 資料互通性
  • 數據質量
  • 熟練勞動力短缺

第三章：Guidehouse 研究排行榜

• Guidehouse Research 排行榜類別
  • 領導者
  • 競爭者
  • 挑戰者
  • 追隨者
• Guidehouse Research 排行榜網格

第四章：公司排名

• 領導者
  • GE Vernova
  • 西門子
  • Energy Exemplar
  • 日立能源
• 競爭者
• OATI
• DIgSILENT
• Copperleaf

第五章：縮寫與簡稱

第六章：目錄

章節7：圖表

第 8 章：研究範圍與方法

The 2025 Guidehouse Research Leaderboard: Grid Planning Analytics Providers report examines a rapidly evolving market that is critical to the energy transition. As utilities and grid operators face mounting challenges from the integration of distributed energy resources (DER), regulatory changes, and the need for advanced planning tools, the demand for sophisticated grid planning analytics solutions has surged. This report is especially timely, as the sector is experiencing significant innovation, with new software platforms and regulatory drivers-such as FERC Order No. 2222-reshaping how utilities plan, model, and optimize transmission and distribution networks.

A Guidehouse Research Leaderboard report is a comprehensive benchmarking study that evaluates and ranks leading vendors within a specific technology or service domain. The Leaderboard methodology provides a transparent, comparative assessment of each company's strategy and execution, offering stakeholders a clear view of the competitive landscape. In this edition, seven prominent grid planning analytics providers are assessed, with the report highlighting the strengths, differentiators, and market positions of each, and identifying which companies are best positioned for long-term success.

The ranking of companies in this Leaderboard is based on a rigorous set of criteria, divided into two main categories: Strategy and Execution. Strategy encompasses vision, go-to-market approach, partnerships, technology, and geographic reach, while Execution covers sales and marketing, product performance, portfolio breadth, pricing, and staying power. Companies that excel in both categories, demonstrating advanced technology, strong market presence, and robust business models, are recognized as Leaders. This structured evaluation ensures that the Leaderboard reflects not only current capabilities but also the potential for sustained leadership in the grid planning analytics market.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

• 1.1 Market Introduction
• 1.2 Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

• 2.1 Market Definition
• 2.2 Market Drivers
  • 2.2.1 DER Hosting and Integration
  • 2.2.2 Transmission Interconnection
  • 2.2.3 Software Evolutions
  • 2.2.4 Hosting Capacity Analysis and Topology Optimization
  • 2.2.5 Regulatory Enablers
  • 2.2.6 Peak Demand
• 2.3 Market Barriers
  • 2.3.1 Legacy Software and Planning Strategies
  • 2.3.2 Data Interoperability
  • 2.3.3 Data Quality
  • 2.3.4 Lack of Skilled Labor

3. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

• 3.1 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Categories
  • 3.1.1 Leaders
  • 3.1.2 Contenders
  • 3.1.3 Challengers
  • 3.1.4 Followers
• 3.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

• 4.1 Leaders
  • 4.1.1 GE Vernova
  • 4.1.2 Siemens
  • 4.1.3 Energy Exemplar
  • 4.1.4 Hitachi Energy
• 4.2 Contenders
  • 4.2.1 OATI
  • 4.2.2 DIgSILENT
  • 4.2.3 Copperleaf

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

• 8.1 Scope of Study
• 8.2 Sources and Methodology
  • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
  • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
    • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
  • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
    • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
    • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

• Table 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
• Table 4-1. GE Vernova's Product Portfolio
• Table 4-2. Siemens' Core Planning Modules
• Table 4-3. Siemens' Partners
• Table 4-4. Energy Exemplar's Core Technology Suite
• Table 4-5. Key Features of Hitachi Energy's Platforms
• Table 4-6. Key Features of OATI's webSmartEnergy DERMS Platform
• Table 4-7. Key Features of DIgSILENT's PowerFactory Platform
• Table 4-8. Key Features of IFS Copperleaf Integrated Planning

List of Figures

• Chart 1-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
• Chart 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
• Chart 4-1. GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-2. Siemens AG Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-3. Energy Exemplar Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-4. Hitachi Energy Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-5. OATI Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-6. DIgSILENT Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-7. Copperleaf Strategy and Execution Scores