查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2123594

硫肥：市場佔有率分析、產業趨勢與統計、成長預測（2026-2031）

Sulfur Fertilizer - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026 - 2031)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

根據 Mordor Intelligence 估計，硫磺肥料市場在 2026 年的價值將達到 53.4 億美元，高於 2025 年的 51 億美元，預計到 2031 年將達到 66.7 億美元。

預計從 2026 年到 2031 年，其複合年成長率將達到 4.58%。

硫肥 - 市場 - IMG1

本報告按類型（硫酸鹽肥料、元素硫等）、形態（固體和液體）、施用方法（土壤施用、施肥灌溉等）、作物類型（穀物、油籽和豆類等）、配銷通路（直接銷售給農民、零售等）和地區（北美、歐洲等）進行細分。市場預測以美元計價。

全球硫肥市場趨勢及洞察

土壤硫缺乏

土壤檢測顯示，由於空氣品質法規的實施，硫酸鹽氣溶膠被清除，過去30年間土壤中的硫含量下降了30%至50%，這使得硫成為繼氮、磷、鉀之後，第四大限制作物產量的營養元素。每公頃施用30至45公斤硫肥的作物，小麥產量可提高15%至25%，且籽粒蛋白質含量更高。有機質含量低的集約化耕作區受影響最大，而田間檢測套組的出現，使得農民能夠在作物生長季開始前繪製硫缺乏地圖。這項功能是硫肥市場的主要驅動力，因為它將潛在的營養缺乏轉化為可衡量的需求。商業玉米農場的產量監測記錄顯示，當葉片中硫含量低於0.2%時，該地區的產量最多可下降18%，凸顯了硫對大型農場的經濟重要性。隨著氣候模式的變化和降雨分佈的改變，滲濾液的流失進一步減少了殘留硫，使得每年的補充幾乎成為必要。

油料作物種植面積及產量增加

油籽（如菜籽和大豆）每單位氮所需的硫量是穀物的兩到三倍，隨著全球種植面積的擴大，化肥的需求也隨之成長。密蘇裡州一所大學的田間試驗表明，施用100磅硫酸銨可使大豆產量每英畝增加8.1蒲式耳，扣除投入成本後，每英畝利潤增加80美元。這些經濟效益促使硫肥在成熟市場持續推廣應用，進而推動了硫肥銷售量的穩定成長。預計到2030年，全球菜籽種植面積將增加180萬公頃，將進一步增加加拿大和澳洲對高硫肥料的需求。此外，蛋白質含量上限較高的生物技術品種也需要更多的硫，因此種子遺傳特性與施肥策略直接相關。

與多種營養成分的專用肥料競爭

農民對能夠一次施用解決多種營養缺乏問題的複合肥料的需求日益成長，這可能會降低對硫磺的單獨需求。供應商正透過將硫磺添加到更廣泛的營養組合中來應對這一需求，但價格競爭和配方複雜性為小規模生產商設定了准入門檻。大型經銷商銷售的捆綁產品允許靈活組合含有硫磺的微量營養素包，同時降低額外成本，從而蠶食了硫磺的單獨銷售市場。為了保持競爭力，硫磺肥料供應商正在探索共同行銷夥伴關係，以提供承包作物營養方案。這些變化可能會對硫磺單獨銷售的利潤率造成壓力，並導致小規模企業之間的整合。

細分市場分析

到2025年，硫酸鹽肥料（包括硫酸銨、硫酸鉀和過磷酸鈣）將佔全球銷售額的50.45%。這反映了它們對植物的快速作用和易於配製的特點。元素硫雖然規模較小，但成長速度較快，年複合成長率達6.39%。這得益於其高分析價值，降低了運輸成本，以及其可控的氧化特性，使其適用於精準施肥方案。微粉化和造粒等技術創新正在縮短氧化延遲，並擴大其在生長週期短的作物中的應用。分次施用策略，即硫酸鹽用於初期生長，元素硫用於持續釋放，顯示硫肥市場的需求是互補的，而非零和博弈。

元素硫的需求趨勢正在推動變數施肥機和遙感探測地圖的應用。這些技術旨在透過提高養分濃度來減少田間作業次數。隨著硫包覆尿素和硫膨潤土被納入主流肥料配方，能夠確保顆粒大小均勻和氧化過程可預測的生產商有望獲得更大的市場佔有率。

2025年，固體產品將維持69.25%的市場佔有率，這主要得益於其高效的儲存方式以及與傳統噴霧器在廣袤農田中的兼容性。顆粒狀和微晶狀硫磺在加工能力和保存期限至關重要的合作混合廠中佔據主導地位。同時，受高價值園藝領域施肥、灌溉和葉面噴布方案日益普及的推動，液態硫磺市場以6.95%的複合年成長率成長。

硫代硫酸銨 (12-0-0-26S) 是液態肥料發展勢頭強勁的典型代表，它可以與氮肥溶液和殺蟲劑混合使用，只需一次噴灑即可高效施用。種植者讚賞其在微灌中的均勻性，以及在關鍵生殖階段植物對其的快速吸收。供應商正在建造區域性終端以縮短運輸距離，預計這將縮小液態肥料與固體肥料的運輸成本差距，並擴大整個硫肥市場的涵蓋範圍積。

區域分析

至2025年，亞太地區將以36.55%的市佔率引領硫肥市場。中國的化肥使用量仍高於全球平均水平，為控制氮肥過量施用，中國大力推廣平衡氮磷鉀肥（NPK-S）施用方法，以在保持產量的同時減少損失。在印度，精準噴施技術的普及以及政府對土壤健康卡的補貼，進一步鞏固了硫肥作為標準農業實踐的地位。在東南亞國家，棕櫚油人工林和水稻雙季種植帶動了硫肥需求的成長；而在日本等已開發國家，高價值農產品對超低氯化物含量的硫肥需求旺盛。到2031年，亞太地區硫肥市場年複合成長率將達到5.35%，這得益於與氣候智慧型農業目標相符的政策。

非洲是成長最快的地區，年複合成長率達6.15%。土壤調查顯示，撒哈拉以南許多地區硫含量不足，各國政府正將化肥補貼與農業推廣服務結合，以促進均衡營養。埃塞俄比亞的國內綜合設施正在建設中，該設施將在吉拉-埃塞俄比亞-魯文大壩（GERD）建成後投入使用，屆時將減少其對進口的依賴。同時，南非的商業農場已經開始使用元素硫混合物來改良鹼性土壤。儘管分銷仍面臨挑戰，但捐助方支持的走廊項目和私人混合中心正致力於改善「最後一公里」配送，從而提振硫肥市場的前景。

在北美，硫磺市場年複合成長率 (CAGR) 保持強勁，達到 3.94%。美國每年從煉油廠回收 820 萬噸硫磺，用於生產磷酸鹽和硫酸銨。近期加拿大對硫磺徵收關稅，導致短期供應緊張，但加拿大豐富的天然氣資源和煉油廠網路構成了其供應基礎。精密農業、覆蓋作物的推廣以及永續性認證正在推動需求的逐步成長。歐洲的硫磺市場年複合成長率為 3.07%，緩釋硫磺產品因其在嚴格的水質法規和維持作物蛋白質含量之間的平衡而備受關注。

其他好處：

  • Excel格式的市場預測（ME）表
  • 3個月的分析師支持

目錄

第1章：引言

  • 研究假設和市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章：調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場狀況

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場促進因素
    • 土壤硫缺乏
    • 油料作物種植面積及產量增加
    • 政府支持永續農業的措施
    • 採用緩釋硫包覆尿素
    • 脫硫裝置回收硫的供應量增加
    • 人工智慧驅動的精準施肥平台
  • 市場限制因素
    • 與多種營養元素肥料的競爭
    • 元素硫原料價格波動
    • 硫酸鹽滲入地下水所帶來的環境風險
    • 新興市場顆粒物元素硫分銷瓶頸
  • 監理情勢
  • 技術展望
  • 波特五力分析

第5章 市場規模與成長預測

  • 按類型
    • 硫酸鹽肥料
      • 硫酸銨
      • 硫酸鉀
      • 硫酸鈣（石膏）
      • 單過磷酸鈣
    • 單質硫
      • 微粉化硫
      • 顆粒狀/有害硫磺
    • 硫酸鹽，一種微量營養素
      • 硫酸鋅
      • 硫酸鎂
      • 其他
    • 其他（硫包覆尿素、硫磺膨潤土）
  • 按形式
    • 固體的
    • 液體
  • 透過應用方法
    • 土壤施用
    • 灌溉
    • 葉面噴布
    • 緩釋/包衣顆粒
  • 按作物類型
    • 穀類和穀類食品
    • 油籽/豆類
    • 水果和蔬菜
    • 草坪和觀賞植物
    • 其他
  • 透過分銷管道
    • 直接從農場
    • 零售商
    • 合作社
    • 線上平台
  • 按地區
    • 北美洲
      • 美國
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
      • 其他北美國家
    • 歐洲
      • 德國
      • 英國
      • 法國
      • 俄羅斯
      • 西班牙
      • 其他歐洲國家
    • 亞太地區
      • 中國
      • 日本
      • 印度
      • 韓國
      • 其他亞太國家
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 阿根廷
      • 其他南美國家
    • 中東
      • 沙烏地阿拉伯
      • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
      • 其他中東國家
    • 非洲
      • 南非
      • 埃及
      • 其他非洲國家

第6章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度
  • 策略趨勢
  • 市佔率分析
  • 公司簡介
    • Nutrien Ltd.
    • Yara International ASA
    • The Mosaic Company
    • K+S AG
    • Israel Chemicals Ltd.
    • Haifa Chemicals Ltd.
    • Nufarm Limited
    • Koch Industries Inc.
    • CF Industries Holdings Inc.
    • OCP SA
    • BASF SE
    • Sinochem Holdings Corp. Ltd.
    • Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company（SAFCO）（Saudi Basic Industries Corporation（SABIC））
    • Tiger-Sul Products LLC（Tessenderlo Group）
    • TogliattiAzot PJSC（Uralchem Group）

第7章 市場機會與未來展望

簡介目錄
Product Code: 67700

According to Mordor Intelligence, sulfur fertilizers market size in 2026 is estimated at USD 5.34 billion, growing from 2025 value of USD 5.1 billion with 2031 projections showing USD 6.67 billion, growing at 4.58% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Sulfur Fertilizer - Market - IMG1

This report is Segmented by Type (Sulfate Fertilizer, Elemental Sulfur, and More), Form (Solid and Liquid), Mode of Application (Soil Application, Fertigation, and More), Crop Type (Cereals and Grains, Oilseeds and Pulses, and More), Distribution Channel (Direct-To-Farm, Retail, and More) and Geography (North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Sulfur Fertilizer Market Trends and Insights

Sulfur Deficiency in Soil

Soil tests indicate sulfur levels have fallen 30-50% during the past three decades as air-quality rules removed sulfate aerosols, making sulfur the fourth most yield-limiting nutrient after nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Crops that receive 30-45 kilograms of sulfur per hectare show wheat yield gains of 15-25% together with higher grain protein. Intensively cropped regions with low organic matter are the most vulnerable, and site-specific test kits now allow farmers to map deficiencies before the season begins. This capability is a primary engine for the sulfur fertilizers market because it converts latent nutrient shortages into measurable demand. Yield monitors on commercial corn farms now record site yield drops of up to 18% when leaf sulfur falls below 0.2%, underscoring the economic stakes for large operations. As climate patterns shift rainfall distribution, leaching losses further lower residual sulfur, making annual supplementation a practical necessity.

Rising Oilseed Acreage and Yields

Oilseed crops such as canola and soybean require two to three times more sulfur per unit of nitrogen than cereals, which intensifies fertilizer demand as the global planted area expands. University field trials in Missouri report 8.1 bushel-per-acre soybean gains from 100 pounds of ammonium sulfate, yielding a USD 80 per-acre profit lift after input costs. The economics encourage continued adoption even in mature markets, reinforcing a stable pull-through on sulfur volumes. Global canola acreage is projected to expand by 1.8 million hectares by 2030, amplifying demand for high-sulfur blends in Canada and Australia. Biotech cultivars with higher protein ceilings also pull more sulfur, linking seed genetics directly to fertilizer strategy.

Competition from Multi-Nutrient Specialty Fertilizers

Farmers increasingly favor single-pass blends that address multiple deficiencies, which can dilute standalone demand for sulfur. Suppliers are responding by embedding sulfur into broader nutrient packages, but pricing competition and formulation complexity raise barriers for smaller producers. Large distributors bundle mix and match micronutrient packs that include sulfur at lower incremental cost, eroding standalone sales. To stay relevant, sulfur fertilizer suppliers are exploring co-marketing alliances that offer turnkey crop nutrition programs. Such shifts could compress standalone sulfur margins and push consolidation among smaller players.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Government Incentives for Sustainable Agriculture
  2. Adoption of Controlled-Release Sulfur-Coated Urea
  3. Volatility in Elemental Sulfur Prices

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

In 2025, sulfate fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and single superphosphate delivered 50.45% of global revenue, reflecting their immediate plant availability and ease of blending. Elemental sulfur, though smaller, is growing faster at a 6.39% CAGR as its higher analysis lowers freight costs and its controlled oxidation fits precision programs. Micronized and pastilled innovations shorten oxidation lag, extending applicability to short-season crops. Split-application strategies combine sulfate for early growth and elemental sulfur for sustained release, underscoring complementary rather than zero-sum demand within the sulfur fertilizers market.

The elemental trend plays into the wider adoption of variable-rate applicators and remote-sensing maps, which rely on higher nutrient density to limit field passes. As sulfur-coated urea and sulfur-bentonite enter mainstream blends, producers that can guarantee uniform particle size and predictable oxidation stand to gain share.

Solid products retained a 69.25% share in 2025, backed by efficient storage and compatibility with conventional spreaders across broad acres. Granulated and prilled formats dominate cooperative blending plants where throughput and shelf life matter. Yet liquid sulfur is advancing at a 6.95% CAGR on the strength of fertigation and foliar programs in high-value horticulture.

Ammonium thiosulfate (12-0-0-26S) typifies liquid momentum, allowing tank mixing with nitrogen solutions and pesticides for single-pass efficiency. Growers appreciate the uniformity in micro-irrigation as well as quicker plant uptake during critical reproductive stages. Vendors are building regional terminals to shorten hauls, which should reduce delivered cost gaps versus solids and widen addressable acreage across the sulfur fertilizers market.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Type
    • Sulfate Fertilizers
      • Ammonium Sulfate
      • Potassium Sulfate
      • Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum)
      • Single Superphosphate
    • Elemental Sulfur
      • Micronized Sulfur
      • Prilled/Pastilled Sulfur
    • Sulfate of Micronutrients
      • Zinc Sulfate
      • Magnesium Sulfate
      • Others
    • Others (Sulfur-coated Urea, Sulfur Bentonite)
  • By Form
    • Solid
    • Liquid
  • By Mode of Application
    • Soil Application
    • Fertigation
    • Foliar Spray
    • Controlled-Release/Coated Granules
  • By Crop Type
    • Cereals and Grains
    • Oilseeds and Pulses
    • Fruits and Vegetables
    • Turf and Ornamentals
    • Others
  • By Distribution Channel
    • Direct-to-Farm
    • Retail Dealers
    • Cooperatives
    • Online Platforms
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • Rest of North America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Russia
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific led the sulfur fertilizers market with a 36.55% share in 2025. China's fertilizer intensity remains above global norms, and efforts to curb excess nitrogen spur the adop-tion of balanced NPK-S regimens that sustain yields while reducing losses. India's shift toward precision spreaders and state subsidies for soil health cards pushes sulfur deeper into standard practice. Southeast Asian nations are raising demand through palm oil estates and double-cropped rice, whereas developed economies such as Japan seek ultra-low chloride options for high-value produce. Regional growth of 5.35% CAGR through 2031 is anchored by policy alignment with climate-smart agriculture goals.

Africa is the fastest-growing region at 6.15% CAGR. Soil surveys indicate sulfur scarcity in many sub-Saharan zones, and governments now couple fertilizer subsidies with extension services that promote balanced nutrition. Ethiopia's domestic complex under construction post-GERD will cut import reliance, while South Africa's commercial farms already leverage elemental sulfur blends to manage alkaline soils. Distribution challenges persist, yet donor-backed corridor projects and private blending hubs aim to improve last-mile reach, brightening prospects for the sulfur fertilizers market.

North America posts a steady 3.94% CAGR as the United States channels 8.2 million metric tons of recovered sulfur each year from refineries into phosphate and ammonium sulfate production. Recent tariffs on Canadian sulfur inject short-term tightness, but abundant domestic gas and refinery networks anchor supply. Precision agronomy, cover-crop adoption, and sustainability certifications fuel incremental demand. Europe, at 3.07% CAGR, balances stringent water-quality directives with the need to uphold crop protein levels, making controlled-release sulfur variants attractive.

  1. Nutrien Ltd.
  2. Yara International ASA
  3. The Mosaic Company
  4. K+S AG
  5. Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  6. Haifa Chemicals Ltd.
  7. Nufarm Limited
  8. Koch Industries Inc.
  9. CF Industries Holdings Inc.
  10. OCP S.A.
  11. BASF SE
  12. Sinochem Holdings Corp. Ltd.
  13. Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (SAFCO) (Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC))
  14. Tiger-Sul Products LLC (Tessenderlo Group)
  15. TogliattiAzot PJSC (Uralchem Group)

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Sulfur deficiency in soil
    • 4.2.2 Rising oilseed acreage and yields
    • 4.2.3 Government incentives for sustainable agriculture
    • 4.2.4 Adoption of controlled-release sulfur-coated urea
    • 4.2.5 Increasing availability of recovered sulfur from desulfurization units
    • 4.2.6 AI-based precision nutrient application platforms
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Competition from multi-nutrient specialty fertilizers
    • 4.3.2 Volatility in elemental sulfur feedstock prices
    • 4.3.3 Environmental risk of sulfate leaching into groundwater
    • 4.3.4 Distribution bottlenecks for prilled elemental sulfur in emerging markets
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Type
    • 5.1.1 Sulfate Fertilizers
      • 5.1.1.1 Ammonium Sulfate
      • 5.1.1.2 Potassium Sulfate
      • 5.1.1.3 Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum)
      • 5.1.1.4 Single Superphosphate
    • 5.1.2 Elemental Sulfur
      • 5.1.2.1 Micronized Sulfur
      • 5.1.2.2 Prilled/Pastilled Sulfur
    • 5.1.3 Sulfate of Micronutrients
      • 5.1.3.1 Zinc Sulfate
      • 5.1.3.2 Magnesium Sulfate
      • 5.1.3.3 Others
    • 5.1.4 Others (Sulfur-coated Urea, Sulfur Bentonite)
  • 5.2 By Form
    • 5.2.1 Solid
    • 5.2.2 Liquid
  • 5.3 By Mode of Application
    • 5.3.1 Soil Application
    • 5.3.2 Fertigation
    • 5.3.3 Foliar Spray
    • 5.3.4 Controlled-Release/Coated Granules
  • 5.4 By Crop Type
    • 5.4.1 Cereals and Grains
    • 5.4.2 Oilseeds and Pulses
    • 5.4.3 Fruits and Vegetables
    • 5.4.4 Turf and Ornamentals
    • 5.4.5 Others
  • 5.5 By Distribution Channel
    • 5.5.1 Direct-to-Farm
    • 5.5.2 Retail Dealers
    • 5.5.3 Cooperatives
    • 5.5.4 Online Platforms
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
      • 5.6.1.1 United States
      • 5.6.1.2 Canada
      • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
      • 5.6.1.4 Rest of North America
    • 5.6.2 Europe
      • 5.6.2.1 Germany
      • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
      • 5.6.2.3 France
      • 5.6.2.4 Russia
      • 5.6.2.5 Spain
      • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.6.3.1 China
      • 5.6.3.2 Japan
      • 5.6.3.3 India
      • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
      • 5.6.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 South America
      • 5.6.4.1 Brazil
      • 5.6.4.2 Argentina
      • 5.6.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.5 Middle East
      • 5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.6.5.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.6 Africa
      • 5.6.6.1 South Africa
      • 5.6.6.2 Egypt
      • 5.6.6.3 Rest of Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Nutrien Ltd.
    • 6.4.2 Yara International ASA
    • 6.4.3 The Mosaic Company
    • 6.4.4 K+S AG
    • 6.4.5 Israel Chemicals Ltd.
    • 6.4.6 Haifa Chemicals Ltd.
    • 6.4.7 Nufarm Limited
    • 6.4.8 Koch Industries Inc.
    • 6.4.9 CF Industries Holdings Inc.
    • 6.4.10 OCP S.A.
    • 6.4.11 BASF SE
    • 6.4.12 Sinochem Holdings Corp. Ltd.
    • 6.4.13 Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (SAFCO) (Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC))
    • 6.4.14 Tiger-Sul Products LLC (Tessenderlo Group)
    • 6.4.15 TogliattiAzot PJSC (Uralchem Group)

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook