查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2099058

網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）：市場佔有率分析、產業趨勢與統計資料、成長預測（2026-2031）

Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture (CSMA) - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026 - 2031)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 181 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

根據 Mordor Intelligence 預測，網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場規模預計將在 2025 年達到 28.8 億美元，2026 年達到 33.7 億美元，到 2031 年達到 86.9 億美元，2026 年至 2031 年的複合年成長率為 20.86%。

網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) - 市場 - IMG1

本報告按組件（軟體和服務）、部署類型（雲端、本地部署、混合部署）、企業規模（大型企業和中小企業）、最終用戶行業（銀行、金融服務和保險、醫療保健和生命科學、資訊技術和通訊、工業製造等）以及地區進行細分。市場預測以價值（美元）表示。

全球網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場趨勢與洞察

快速過渡到分散式和混合IT環境

分散式和混合IT的轉型仍然是推動網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）市場需求的最大動力。企業現在跨本地站點、公共雲端、私有雲端和邊緣位置同時運行工作負載，這降低了單一邊界防禦模型的有效性。 NIST 特別出版刊物800-207 指出，現代企業網路中不再存在清晰定義的邊界，凸顯了分散式安全控制的必要性。對許多組織而言，這種營運模式已不再是臨時性的。業務部門和 IT 部門之間的協作比以往任何時候都更加緊密，尤其是在金融服務和製造業領域。思科的《2025 年人工智慧勞動力聯盟》報告也指出，七國集團在服務網狀和零信任架構方面存在嚴重的技能缺口，凸顯了混合 IT 的發展速度遠超過現有專業知識的水平。

在全公司範圍內推廣零信任計劃

零信任計畫正從先導計畫轉向更廣泛的生產部署，從而推動了網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場的成長。以往使用獨立身分、端點和網路工具實施零信任的組織，往往發現這些控制措施在分散式環境中以零碎的方式應用。基於網狀架構的設計將這些控制措施整合在一起，確保檢驗、分段和策略決策能夠更一致地發揮作用。 NIST 網路安全框架 2.0 的發布進一步強化了這一趨勢，它將管治和保護結果以一種與可組合安全控制措施高度契合的方式聯繫起來。這使得網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場比純粹的自由支配型安全支出更具穩健性，因為這些計劃越來越與正式的營運和合規性要求緊密相關。

整合傳統安全技術和現代安全技術棧的複雜性。

整合仍然是一個主要阻礙因素，因為許多傳統安全工具並未公開網狀架構所需的 API、遙測格式或策略結構。採購公司的環境越分散，採用 CSMA 的商業理由就越充分，但實施路徑也就越長。因此，對於需要添加中間件和外部服務或分階段遷移才能實現大規模策略編配的組織而言，網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場的成長速度將會放緩。 IBM 於 2025 年 2 月收購 HashiCorp 表明，即使是大型供應商，也需要投入大量資金才能將金鑰管理、基礎設施配置和混合雲端安全性整合到單一堆棧中。這也解釋了為什麼許多中型專案儘管有明確的策略需求，卻仍停留在試點階段的時間比預期更長。

細分市場分析

到 2025 年，軟體元件的收入佔比將達到 60.91%，成為網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場中最大的元件。買家最初將支出分配給策略管理、安全分析和身分編配，因為這些層構成了網狀模型的基礎。這一趨勢表明，許多初始部署都從架構和可見性入手，然後再轉向更廣泛的運維支援。這也反映了大型企業的採購行為，這些企業已經擁有系統的安全藍圖，並希望先整合策略邏輯。

預計2026年至2031年間，服務業的複合年成長率將達到22.94%，成為各組成類別中成長最快的細分市場。這一成長速度表明，僅靠軟體無法解決傳統安全架構與新型編配層之間的整合問題。隨著買家從試驗計畫轉向大規模部署，諮詢支援、託管偵測與回應 (MDR) 以及部署服務的角色日益凸顯。此外，由於許多供應商將入駐、策略調整和託管營運等服務打包到平台訂閱中，軟體和服務之間的界線也日漸模糊。這進一步加速了服務的成長，而軟體仍然是網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場的主要收入來源。

到2025年，雲端採用將占公司營收的53.87%，使公司在網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）部署模式下佔據市場佔有率榜首。雲端的快速普及歸功於更快的資源配置、更低的架構開銷以及便利的供應商管理保全服務。對於內部架構管理能力有限的組織而言，這種模式尤其實用，因為大部分平台管理工作都已轉移給服務提供者。此外，它還使希望在無需大量前期投資的情況下實現企業級控制功能的中小型企業能夠快速部署。

混合部署預計到 2031 年將以 23.05% 的複合年成長率成長，成為成長最快的部署選項。對於大規模組織而言，僅將安全性完全遷移到雲端通常並不現實，因為出於主權、延遲和監管限制等原因，它們仍然運行關鍵的本地系統。混合模式允許這些組織將單一策略應用於其傳統基礎架構和新的數位環境，而無需在每次遷移新工作負載時重新設計安全策略。本地環境在敏感資訊處理、工業和空氣間隙環境中仍然至關重要，這凸顯了混合架構的長期需求。這將確保混合架構在網路安全網狀架構 (CSMA) 市場中保持更強勁的成長動能。

區域分析

到2025年，北美將佔全球整體營收的32.12%，成為網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）市場最大的區域市場。該地區的優勢在於其密集的金融服務基礎設施、集中的專業供應商，以及將零信任視為許多公共部門基本要求的政策環境。聯邦指南和特定產業的安全義務進一步提升了持續檢驗和以身份為中心的控制對美國大型組織的重要性，與監管和供應商生態系統尚不成熟的地區相比，這使得美國的決策週期更短。加拿大和墨西哥正透過數位基礎設施的擴展和跨境安全需求（這些需求越來越依賴協作控制模型）來推動市場成長。

歐洲仍是主要的需求中心，短時間內實施的多項監管變革促使各組織採用更結構化的安全架構。這種壓力在受監管行業尤為明顯，這些行業需要更嚴格的門禁控制、第三方風險敞口控制和營運彈性。與其他一些地區相比，歐洲買家也更傾向於混合部署和主權部署模式。德國電信和 Palo Alto Networks 聯合推出了「Sovereign Cortex with T Security」解決方案，以滿足此需求。此方案利用先進的託管安全功能，同時將遙測資料保留在歐洲境內。在南美洲，隨著金融數位化和公共部門現代化，CSMA 試點部署和分階段推廣的實施取得了穩步進展，為 CSMA 的試點部署和分階段推廣創造了更有利的環境。

預計到2031年，亞太地區將以23.38%的複合年成長率成長，成為網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）市場成長最快的地區。這一成長主要得益於快速的數位化進程、5G基礎設施的擴展以及國家網路安全框架的加強。印度、日本、韓國和澳洲以不同的方式做出貢獻，但它們都面臨著對現代基礎設施中分散式身分和存取控制日益成長的需求。該地區還有大量組織正在建構大規模的雲端原生系統，這與面向網狀架構的安全設計非常契合。在中國，國家對跨雲端和本地環境的身份和存取管理的重視進一步提升了協同安全模型的重要性。雖然中東和非洲地區的CSMA應用仍處於發展成熟階段，但沙烏地阿拉伯和阿拉伯聯合大公國（阿拉伯聯合大公國）正透過數位政府和關鍵基礎建設計畫推動CSMA的應用。這些區域特徵的組合將確保亞太地區和部分中東市場繼續成為網路安全網狀架構（CSMA）市場的主要成長引擎。

其他好處：

  • Excel格式的市場預測（ME）表
  • 3個月的分析師支持

目錄

第1章：引言

  • 研究假設和市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章：調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場狀況

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場促進因素
    • 快速過渡到分散式和混合IT環境
    • 在全公司範圍內推廣零信任計劃
    • 以身分為中心的安全編配。
    • 工具的激增使得跨平台安全整合變得特別必要。
    • 持續訪問認證方面的合規壓力
    • 安全團隊正在努力縮短控制事件所需的平均時間。
  • 市場限制因素
    • 整合傳統安全技術棧和現代安全技術棧的複雜性。
    • 缺乏精通 Mesh 系統的安保人員。
    • 對多供應商安全網中供應商鎖定問題的擔憂
    • 在有限的預算內確定優先事項，並將其與合規方面的即時支出進行比較。
  • 產業價值鏈分析
  • 監理情勢
  • 技術展望
  • 波特五力分析

第5章 市場規模與成長預測

  • 按組件
    • 軟體
    • 服務
  • 不同的發展
    • 雲
    • 現場
    • 混合
  • 按公司規模
    • 大公司
    • 小型企業
  • 按最終用戶行業分類
    • BFSI
    • 醫療保健和生命科學
    • 資訊科技/通訊
    • 零售與電子商務
    • 工業製造
    • 政府/公共部門
    • 其他終端用戶產業
  • 按地區
    • 北美洲
      • 美國
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 阿根廷
      • 其他南美國家
    • 歐洲
      • 德國
      • 英國
      • 法國
      • 義大利
      • 西班牙
      • 俄羅斯
      • 其他歐洲國家
    • 亞太地區
      • 中國
      • 印度
      • 日本
      • 韓國
      • 澳洲
      • 其他亞太國家
    • 中東和非洲
      • 中東
        • 沙烏地阿拉伯
        • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
        • 其他中東國家
      • 非洲
        • 南非
        • 奈及利亞
        • 其他非洲國家

第6章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度
  • 策略趨勢
  • 市佔率分析
  • 公司簡介
    • IBM Corporation
    • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • Fortinet, Inc.
    • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
    • Zscaler, Inc.
    • Cloudflare, Inc.
    • Akamai Technologies, Inc.
    • Trend Micro Incorporated
    • Forcepoint LLC
    • F5, Inc.
    • Ivanti, Inc.
    • SonicWall Inc.
    • Cato Networks Ltd.
    • Appgate, Inc.
    • SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
    • CyberArk Software Ltd.
    • Okta, Inc.

第7章 市場機會與未來展望

簡介目錄
Product Code: 99863

According to Mordor Intelligence, the cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market size is projected to be USD 2.88 billion in 2025, USD 3.37 billion in 2026, and reach USD 8.69 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 20.86% from 2026 to 2031.

Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture (CSMA) - Market - IMG1

This report is Segmented by Component (Software, and Services), Deployment (Cloud, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), End-User Industry (BFSI, Healthcare and Life Sciences, Information Technology and Telecom, Industrial Manufacturing, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture (CSMA) Market Trends and Insights

Rapid Shift to Distributed And Hybrid IT Environments

The move to distributed and hybrid IT remains the strongest driver of demand for the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market. Enterprises now run workloads across on-premises sites, public clouds, private clouds, and edge locations simultaneously, weakening single-perimeter defense models. NIST Special Publication 800-207 states that modern enterprise networks no longer have a clearly defined perimeter, which supports the need for distributed security controls. This operating model is no longer temporary for most organizations, especially in financial services and manufacturing, where operational and information technology are now more closely connected. Cisco's 2025 AI Workforce Consortium report also identified service mesh and zero-trust architecture as high-severity skill gaps across G7 economies, underscoring how quickly hybrid IT is advancing relative to available expertise.

Zero Trust Program Expansion Across Enterprises

Zero-trust programs are moving from pilot projects into broader production use, which is supporting the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market. Organizations that adopted zero trust with separate identity, endpoint, and network tools often found that these controls led to fragmented enforcement across distributed environments. A mesh-based design helps connect those controls so that verification, segmentation, and policy decisions work together more consistently. NIST's Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 release reinforces this direction by linking governance and protection outcomes in a way that aligns well with composable security controls. This makes the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market more resilient than purely discretionary security spending because these programs are increasingly tied to formal operating and compliance requirements.

Integration Complexity Across Legacy and Modern Security Stacks

Integration remains the main restraint because many legacy security tools do not expose the APIs, telemetry formats, or policy structures that mesh architectures need. Buyers with the most fragmented estates often have the strongest business case for CSMA, but they also face the longest implementation path. The Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market, therefore, grows more slowly in organizations that must add middleware, external services, or staged migrations before policy orchestration can work at scale. IBM's February 2025 acquisition of HashiCorp shows how much investment is required, even for a major vendor, to integrate secrets management, infrastructure provisioning, and hybrid cloud security into a single stack. This is why many mid-sized projects stay in pilot mode longer than planned, even when the strategic need is clear.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Rising Identity-Centric Security Orchestration Needs
  2. Tool Sprawl Forcing Cross-Platform Security Coordination
  3. Shortage of Mesh-Literate Security Talent

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Software accounted for 60.91% of component revenue in 2025, making it the largest component of the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market. Buyers initially allocated their spending to policy management, security analytics, and identity orchestration because those layers form the foundation for a mesh model. This pattern shows that many early deployments start with architecture and visibility before moving into broader operating support. It also reflects the buying behavior of large enterprises that already have structured security roadmaps and want to consolidate policy logic first.

Services are projected to grow at a 22.94% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, which makes them the fastest-growing component category. That pace shows that software alone cannot resolve the integration work between older security stacks and newer orchestration layers. Advisory support, managed detection and response, and implementation services are taking a larger role as buyers move from pilot programs into scaled deployments. The line between software and services is also becoming less clear because many vendors now bundle platform subscriptions with onboarding, policy tuning, and managed operations. This keeps services on a faster path, even while software remains the revenue anchor in the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market.

Cloud deployment accounted for 53.87% of revenue in 2025, giving it the leading position in the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market share by deployment model. Cloud gained early traction because it allows faster provisioning, lower infrastructure overhead, and easier access to vendor-managed security services. This model has been especially useful for organizations with limited in-house architecture capacity because much of the platform management shifts to the provider. It also supported faster entry for smaller firms that wanted enterprise-grade controls without large upfront investments.

Hybrid deployment is projected to expand at a 23.05% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing deployment option. Large organizations still operate critical on-premises systems for sovereignty, latency, and regulatory reasons, so a full migration to cloud-only security is often impractical. The hybrid model lets these organizations apply a single policy across older infrastructure and newer digital environments without redesigning security each time a new workload moves. On-premises environments also remain relevant in classified, industrial, and air-gapped settings, which strengthens the long-term case for hybrid architectures. This keeps hybrid on a stronger growth path inside the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Component
    • Software
    • Services
  • By Deployment
    • Cloud
    • On-Premises
    • Hybrid
  • By Enterprise Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small and Medium Enterprises
  • By End-user Industry
    • BFSI
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Information Technology and Telecom
    • Retail and E-commerce
    • Industrial Manufacturing
    • Government and Public Sector
    • Other End-user Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 32.12% of global revenue in 2025, making it the leading regional market for Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA). The region benefits from dense financial services infrastructure, a strong concentration of specialist vendors, and a policy environment that treats zero trust as a baseline requirement in many public sector settings. Federal guidance and sector-specific security obligations have made continuous verification and identity-centric controls more urgent for large U.S. organizations, thereby shortening decision cycles compared with regions where the regulatory and vendor ecosystems are still less mature. Canada and Mexico added support through digital infrastructure growth and cross-border security requirements that increasingly depend on coordinated control models.

Europe remained a major demand center because several regulatory changes took effect within a short period, prompting organizations to adopt more structured security architectures. That pressure has been especially visible in regulated industries that need stronger oversight of access, third-party exposure, and operational resilience. European buyers have also shown a stronger preference for hybrid and sovereign deployment patterns than in some other regions. Deutsche Telekom and Palo Alto Networks addressed that need through Sovereign Cortex with T Security, which keeps telemetry within European borders while still using advanced managed security capabilities. South America saw steady progress as financial digitization and public-sector modernization created a more favorable environment for CSMA pilots and phased deployments.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at a 23.38% CAGR through 2031, making it the fastest-growing region in the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market. The region is being supported by high digitization speed, expanding 5G infrastructure, and stronger national cybersecurity frameworks. India, Japan, South Korea, and Australia are all contributing through different paths, but each shows a rising need for distributed identity and access controls across modern infrastructure. The region also contains many organizations building cloud-native systems at scale, which aligns well with a mesh-oriented security design. In China, national approaches to identity and access management across cloud and on-premises environments add another layer of relevance for coordinated security models. The Middle East and Africa remain earlier in deployment maturity, but Saudi Arabia and the UAE are pushing adoption through digital government and critical infrastructure programs. Over time, that regional mix should keep Asia-Pacific and selected Middle East markets important growth engines for the Cybersecurity mesh architecture (CSMA) market.

  1. IBM Corporation
  2. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  3. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  4. Fortinet, Inc.
  5. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  6. Microsoft Corporation
  7. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
  8. Zscaler, Inc.
  9. Cloudflare, Inc.
  10. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
  11. Trend Micro Incorporated
  12. Forcepoint LLC
  13. F5, Inc.
  14. Ivanti, Inc.
  15. SonicWall Inc.
  16. Cato Networks Ltd.
  17. Appgate, Inc.
  18. SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
  19. CyberArk Software Ltd.
  20. Okta, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rapid Shift to Distributed and Hybrid IT Environments
    • 4.2.2 Zero Trust Program Expansion Across Enterprises
    • 4.2.3 Rising Identity-Centric Security Orchestration Needs
    • 4.2.4 Tool Sprawl Is Forcing Cross-Platform Security Coordination
    • 4.2.5 Compliance Pressure Around Continuous Access Verification
    • 4.2.6 Security Teams Seeking Lower Mean Time to Contain Incidents
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Integration Complexity Across Legacy and Modern Security Stacks
    • 4.3.2 Shortage of Mesh-Literate Security Talent
    • 4.3.3 Vendor Lock-In Concerns in Multi-Vendor Security Meshes
    • 4.3.4 Limited Budget Prioritization Versus Immediate Compliance Spend
  • 4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Component
    • 5.1.1 Software
    • 5.1.2 Services
  • 5.2 By Deployment
    • 5.2.1 Cloud
    • 5.2.2 On-Premises
    • 5.2.3 Hybrid
  • 5.3 By Enterprise Size
    • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
    • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
  • 5.4 By End-user Industry
    • 5.4.1 BFSI
    • 5.4.2 Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • 5.4.3 Information Technology and Telecom
    • 5.4.4 Retail and E-commerce
    • 5.4.5 Industrial Manufacturing
    • 5.4.6 Government and Public Sector
    • 5.4.7 Other End-user Industries
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
      • 5.5.1.1 United States
      • 5.5.1.2 Canada
      • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
      • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
      • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
      • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
      • 5.5.3.1 Germany
      • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
      • 5.5.3.3 France
      • 5.5.3.4 Italy
      • 5.5.3.5 Spain
      • 5.5.3.6 Russia
      • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.4.1 China
      • 5.5.4.2 India
      • 5.5.4.3 Japan
      • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
      • 5.5.4.5 Australia
      • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
        • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
        • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
        • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
      • 5.5.5.2 Africa
        • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
        • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
        • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
    • 6.4.2 Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • 6.4.3 Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 6.4.4 Fortinet, Inc.
    • 6.4.5 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
    • 6.4.6 Microsoft Corporation
    • 6.4.7 CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Zscaler, Inc.
    • 6.4.9 Cloudflare, Inc.
    • 6.4.10 Akamai Technologies, Inc.
    • 6.4.11 Trend Micro Incorporated
    • 6.4.12 Forcepoint LLC
    • 6.4.13 F5, Inc.
    • 6.4.14 Ivanti, Inc.
    • 6.4.15 SonicWall Inc.
    • 6.4.16 Cato Networks Ltd.
    • 6.4.17 Appgate, Inc.
    • 6.4.18 SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
    • 6.4.19 CyberArk Software Ltd.
    • 6.4.20 Okta, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment