查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1851579

簽章檢驗：市場佔有率分析、產業趨勢、統計數據和成長預測（2025-2030 年）

Signature Verification - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

預計到 2025 年，簽章檢驗市場規模將達到 28 億美元，到 2030 年將成長至 36 億美元，預測期內複合年成長率為 20.6%。

簽章驗證-市場-IMG1

歐洲的eIDAS 2.0和美國的21 CFR Part 11正在加速推動受監管產業採用可靠的數位簽章檢驗。詐欺數量的增加、人工智慧賦能的偽造分析技術的進步以及向雲端的快速遷移進一步刺激了市場需求。從人工智慧賦能的郵寄選票處理到與Aadhaar卡關聯的電子錢包，政府專案正在拓展應用場景和地理覆蓋範圍，而多模態認證和API優先的交付模式正在重塑整個簽名檢驗市場的競爭格局。

全球簽章檢驗市場趨勢與洞察

eIDAS 2.0 和美國聯邦法規第 11 部分合規性要求

eIDAS 2.0 要求所有歐盟公民在 2026 年前擁有可互通的數位身分錢包，並提高了由經認證的信任服務供應商支援的合格電子簽章的標準。同時，FDA 指南也進行了更新，強調審核追蹤和基於風險的驗證，迫使製藥公司轉向人工智慧驅動的簽名檢驗平台。因此，跨國公司正在尋求一種能夠同時滿足這兩個體係要求的統一檢驗架構，從而加速圍繞雲端服務提供者的整合，以實現全球政策合規。

2024年大選後，郵寄選票簽名查核數量將激增。

目前，美國已有31個州要求對缺席選票進行簽名檢驗，推動了對高通量系統的需求。北卡羅來納州的一項試點項目表明，自動化平台每小時可處理1000張選票，將人工審核時間縮短了95%。隨後，加州強制要求採用技術輔助審核，並配備人工故障保障機制，優先考慮審核而非速度。能夠處理多元文化和年齡相關簽名差異的供應商價格更高，因為選舉機構需要的是準確性、裁決透明度和監管審核能力。

整合採集設備的多樣性與傳統壁壘

機構通常依賴簽名墊片、平板電腦和行動應用程式等多種設備，這些設備產生的資料解析度和取樣率各不相同。演算法必須補償不一致的壓力曲線和時間數據，這會增加故障率和整體擁有成本。將現代檢驗與傳統記錄系統整合會增加複雜性，因為資料會變得孤立，從而阻礙全面的詐欺分析。小型金融機構會推遲升級，因為更換硬體的成本超過了預期收益，儘管升級可以提高安全性，但短期內仍難以採用。

細分市場分析

到2024年，軟體將佔據簽章檢驗市場58%的佔有率，這反映出雲端原生人工智慧模式的普及，這些模式能夠跨網路、行動和分店通路實現即時詐欺偵測。雖然簽名墊片等硬體設備在受監管的環境中仍然佔據一席之地，但隨著遠端工作流程的普及，其市場佔有率將持續下降。預計到2030年，軟體領域的複合年成長率將達到23.7%，這主要得益於將身分驗證功能嵌入銀行、醫療保健和政府入口網站的SDK。供應商正在靜態影像比較的基礎上疊加行為分析，以降低人工審核率和決策延遲。邊緣部署模型解決了間歇性連接的問題，使其在物流和現場服務等應用情境中更具吸引力。持續的模型重新訓練也使供應商能夠在無需客戶更改程式碼的情況下適應新的攻擊模式，這凸顯了軟體在簽章檢驗市場中的結構性優勢。

儘管硬體成長放緩，但在需要實體儲存濕墨簽名的領域，硬體仍然保持著重要的地位。法院、公證處和一些生命科學實驗室仍然要求使用經過認證的設備進行現場簽名採集，這些設備會添加加密時間戳記。然而，這些產業的採購週期仍然很長，資本預算固定，維修成本也很高。隨著雲端運算經濟將決策標準轉向營運支出，許多買家現在正在逐步淘汰使用壽命到期的設備，轉而採用行動採集和後端人工智慧檢驗。這種轉變鞏固了以軟體為中心的經營模式的主導地位，並確保供應商專注於訂閱收入流，而不是一次性硬體銷售。

到2024年，本地部署將佔簽名檢驗市場規模的55%，這主要得益於受監管嚴格的銀行、保險公司和生命科學公司出於審核和延遲方面的考慮而傾向於本地管理。然而，預計到2030年，雲端/SaaS的採用率將以每年28.2%的速度成長，並憑藉規模經濟和通用API覆蓋範圍，將縮小本地部署與本地部署在簽章驗證用戶基數上的差距。雲端平台將模型訓練集中在一個集中式環境中，利用多樣化的資料集來提高抵禦深度造假威脅的準確性。彈性運算資源配置可以減少閒置的基礎設施支出，這對於在投票高峰期處理大量工作負載的選舉委員會來說是一項關鍵優勢。

區域雲區域支援 GDPR 和 eIDAS 2.0 下的資料居住需求，並維護統一的策略引擎。將簽名工件的小型資料庫與雲端基礎的推理相結合的混合架構，為謹慎的採用者提供了一條合適的合規橋樑。服務提供者透過執行時間SLA、自動修補程式和無縫功能部署來增強其價值提案。隨著企業逐漸意識到營運敏捷性比感知到的主權風險更為重要，簽章檢驗市場有望加速 SaaS 訂閱模式的轉變。

區域分析

北美地區佔2024年總收入的34%，這得益於其成熟的管理體制和風險投資支持的創新生態系統。各州從2024年選舉週期開始實施自動選票簽名系統，以增強選舉公正性，促使選舉委員會迅速升級系統。金融機構也擴大了利用人工智慧分析技術檢測存款時細微簽名偏差的系統部署，以防止日益複雜和大規模的支票詐騙。 USAA持續獲得許可，雖然帶來了收入，但也增加了銀行整合遠端存款模組的合規成本。該地區對FDA第11部分審核合規性的重視，進一步推動了對用於記錄簽名認證和監管鏈的專用平台的需求。

亞太地區預計在2025年至2030年間以25.44%的複合年成長率實現最高成長，這主要得益於印度基於Aadhaar身分識別系統的電子錢包和行動支付生態系統的快速發展。高交易量和頻繁發生的詐騙案件促使印度儲備銀行收緊了KYC（了解你的客戶）標準，並促使各銀行將多模態簽章檢驗納入客戶註冊流程。日本和韓國正在推動指靜脈和行為生物識別技術的研究，並經常將這些技術與簽名分析相結合，以實現可靠的企業登入。透過國內可用區，Cloud Hyperscale確保簽章檢驗市場在滿足嚴格的居住法規要求的同時，還能利用全球威脅情報資訊。

歐洲的成長前景圍繞著eIDAS 2.0展開，該標準規範了合格的電子簽章，並強制要求區域內跨境互通性。認證信任服務提供者在頒發嵌入簽章有效載荷的數位憑證方面發揮關鍵作用，這提高了演算法檢驗的技術要求。英國脫歐使英國歐工作流程複雜化，迫使供應商在承諾提供無縫使用者體驗的同時，維護雙重合規體系。 GDPR對隱私設計的期望迫使供應商採用聯邦學習技術，並在不跨司法管轄區導出簽名資料的情況下訓練模型。因此，歐洲買家將權衡演算法準確性和可證明的隱私保護措施，並傾向於選擇能夠同時提供這兩項服務的供應商。

其他好處

  • Excel格式的市場預測（ME）表
  • 3個月的分析師支持

目錄

第1章 引言

  • 研究假設和市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場情勢

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場促進因素
    • 基於 eIDAS 2.0 和美國聯邦法規第 11 部分的合規指令
    • 2024年大選後，郵寄選票簽名查核數量將激增。
    • 金融犯罪受害者推動基於人工智慧的支票詐騙分析
    • 將雲端原生 API 整合到電子簽章套件中
    • GenAI的偽造簽名檢測演算法
    • 印度的基於 Aadhaar 的數位簽章錢包（UPI 3.0）
  • 市場限制
    • 整合採集設備的多樣性與傳統壁壘
    • 多元文化選民名單上的高FRR引發訴訟
    • 資料主權限制跨境模型訓練
    • 專利訴訟風險（例如，MITK v. USAA 案）
  • 價值/供應鏈分析
  • 監管環境
  • 科技展望（人工智慧、邊緣運算、世代人工智慧）
  • 波特的五力模型
    • 新進入者的威脅
    • 供應商的議價能力
    • 買方的議價能力
    • 替代品的威脅
    • 競爭對手之間的競爭

第5章 市場規模與成長預測

  • 按解決方案類型
    • 硬體
      • 簽名墊片和感應器
      • 生物辨識終端/自助服務終端
    • 軟體
      • 靜態（離線）檢驗
      • 動態（線上）檢驗
      • SDK/API平台
  • 按部署模式
    • 本地部署
    • 雲/SaaS
  • 透過身份驗證模式
    • 獨立簽名
    • 多模態（簽名+文件影像/身分證/啟動）
  • 按最終用戶行業分類
    • 金融服務
    • 政府與選舉
    • 衛生保健
    • 運輸與物流
    • 法律與房地產
    • 其他行業
  • 按地區
    • 北美洲
      • 美國
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 歐洲
      • 英國
      • 德國
      • 法國
      • 義大利
      • 其他歐洲地區
    • 亞太地區
      • 中國
      • 日本
      • 印度
      • 韓國
      • 亞太其他地區
    • 中東
      • 以色列
      • 沙烏地阿拉伯
      • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
      • 土耳其
      • 其他中東地區
    • 非洲
      • 南非
      • 埃及
      • 其他非洲地區
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 阿根廷
      • 南美洲其他地區

第6章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度
  • 策略趨勢
  • 市佔率分析
  • 公司簡介
    • Mitek Systems Inc.
    • Parascript LLC
    • IBM Corp.
    • Adobe Inc.
    • DocuSign Inc.
    • Ascertia Ltd
    • Jumio Corp.
    • Ekata Inc.
    • Acuant Inc.
    • SutiSoft Inc.
    • CERTIFY Global Inc.
    • Scriptel Corp.
    • iSign Solutions Inc.
    • Veriff
    • Hitachi Ltd.（Biometric systems）
    • HID Global（Assa Abloy）
    • Signicat AS
    • Topaz Systems Inc.
    • Aratek Biometrics
    • Biometric Signature ID

第7章 市場機會與未來展望

簡介目錄
Product Code: 59014

The signature verification market reached USD 2.8 billion in 2025 and is expected to grow to USD 3.6 billion by 2030, delivering a 20.6% CAGR over the forecast period.

Signature Verification - Market - IMG1

Momentum is fueled by eIDAS 2.0 in Europe and 21 CFR Part 11 in the United States, both of which compel regulated sectors to adopt trustworthy digital-signature validation. Rising fraud losses, advances in AI-driven forgery analytics, and rapid cloud migration further elevate demand. Government programs ranging from AI-assisted mail-in ballot processing to Aadhaar-linked wallets expand use-cases and geographic reach. Meanwhile, multimodal authentication and API-first delivery models are reshaping competitive positioning across the signature verification market.

Global Signature Verification Market Trends and Insights

Compliance mandates under eIDAS 2.0 & U.S. CFR Part 11

The harmonized push from Brussels and Washington is forcing enterprises to modernize outdated electronic-record systems. eIDAS 2.0 obliges all EU citizens to hold interoperable digital identity wallets by 2026, raising the bar for qualified electronic signatures backed by certified trust service providers. Simultaneously, updated FDA guidance stresses audit trails and risk-based validation, compelling pharmaceutical sponsors to shift toward AI-enabled signature verification platforms. Multinationals consequently seek unified verification architectures that satisfy both regimes, accelerating consolidation around cloud players capable of global policy compliance.

Surge in mail-in ballot signature checks post-2024 elections

Thirty-one U.S. states now require signature verification for absentee ballots, elevating demand for high-throughput systems. North Carolina's pilot demonstrated that automated platforms processed 1,000 ballots per hour, cutting manual review time by 95%. California subsequently mandated technology-assisted review with manual fail-safes, placing auditability above speed. Vendors able to accommodate multicultural signature variation and age-related changes command premium pricing as election agencies pay for accuracy, adjudication transparency, and regulatory audit features.

Variability across capture devices & legacy silo integration

Organizations often rely on a patchwork of signature pads, tablets, and mobile apps, each producing data at different resolutions and sampling rates. Algorithms must compensate for inconsistent pressure curves and timing data, which inflates false-reject rates and raises total cost of ownership. Integrating modern verification with legacy record systems adds complexity, as siloed data prevents holistic fraud analytics. Smaller institutions postpone upgrades because replacing hardware exceeds perceived benefits, restraining near-term adoption despite compelling security gains.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Fin-crime losses driving AI-based check-fraud analytics
  2. Cloud-native APIs embedded in e-signature suites
  3. High FRR in multicultural voter rolls sparks litigation

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Software accounted for 58% of the 2024 signature verification market, reflecting widespread adoption of cloud-native AI models that deliver real-time fraud detection across web, mobile, and branch channels. Hardware devices such as signature pads remain entrenched in regulated environments, yet their share will continue to erode as remote workflows dominate. The software segment is forecast to post a 23.7% CAGR through 2030, propelled by SDKs that embed verification inside banking, healthcare, and government portals. Vendors are layering behavioral analytics atop static image comparison, thereby reducing manual review rates and shrinking decision latency. Edge-deployable models address locations with intermittent connectivity, broadening appeal to logistics and field-service use-cases. Continuous model retraining also enables vendors to counter emerging attack patterns without customer-side code changes, underscoring software's structural advantage within the signature verification market.

Hardware, though slower-growing, retains niche relevance where physical custody of wet-ink signatures is non-negotiable. Courts, notaries, and select life-sciences labs still require in-person capture using certified devices that append cryptographic timestamps. Yet procurement cycles in these verticals remain long, capital budgets fixed, and retrofit costs high. As cloud economics shift decision criteria toward operating expenditure, many buyers now phase out devices at end-of-life, migrating to mobile capture plus back-end AI validation. This transition reinforces the ascendancy of software-centric business models and cements provider focus on subscription revenue streams rather than one-time hardware sales.

On-premises deployments represented 55% of the signature verification market size in 2024 as heavily regulated banks, insurers, and life-sciences firms favored local control for audit and latency reasons. However, cloud/SaaS installations are projected to compound at 28.2% annually through 2030, narrowing the installed-base gap on economies of scale and universal API reach. Cloud platforms concentrate model training in centralized environments, leveraging diverse datasets that sharpen accuracy against deepfake threats. Elastic compute provisioning cuts idle infrastructure spending, a critical advantage for election boards that process workloads in intense bursts during peak voting periods.

Regional cloud zones support data-residency mandates under GDPR and eIDAS 2.0 while maintaining uniform policy engines. Hybrid architectures-local storage of signature artefacts combined with cloud-based inference-offer a compliance-friendly bridge for cautious adopters. Providers bolster value propositions with uptime SLAs, automated patching, and seamless feature rollouts that would be cost-prohibitive in isolated data centers. As organizations conclude that operational agility outweighs perceived sovereignty risks, the signature verification market is poised for an accelerated shift toward SaaS subscriptions.

Signature Verification Market Report is Segmented by Solution Type (Hardware, Software), Deployment Model (On-Premises, Cloud / SaaS), Authentication Mode (Stand-Alone Signature, Multimodal (signature + Doc Image / ID / Liveness)), End-User Industry (Financial Services, Healthcare and More), Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 34% of 2024 revenue, supported by mature regulatory regimes and venture-backed innovation ecosystems. States introduced automated ballot-signature systems to enhance electoral integrity after the 2024 cycle, driving rapid upgrades among election boards. Financial institutions also escalated adoption to blunt check-fraud schemes that escalated in sophistication and scale, leveraging AI analytics to detect subtle signature deviations at deposit time. Patent enforcement remains a double-edged sword: USAA's ongoing licensing victories generate revenue but elevate compliance costs for banks integrating remote-deposit modules. The region's focus on audit readiness under FDA Part 11 further solidifies demand for specialized platforms that document signature provenance and chain-of-custody.

Asia Pacific is forecast to deliver the highest regional CAGR of 25.44% between 2025 and 2030, anchored by India's Aadhaar-linked wallets and surging mobile-payment ecosystems. Massive transaction volumes and episodic fraud incidents encourage the Reserve Bank of India to tighten KYC norms, prompting banks to embed multimodal signature verification in onboarding workflows. Japan and South Korea advance finger-vein and behavioural-biometric research, often pairing those technologies with signature analysis for high-trust enterprise login. Local data-sovereignty mandates spur demand for regionally hosted inference clusters, which cloud hyperscale's provide through in-country availability zones, ensuring that the signature verification market meets stringent residency rules while still leveraging global threat-intelligence feeds.

Europe's growth narrative revolves around eIDAS 2.0, which formalizes qualified electronic signatures and compels cross-border interoperability throughout the bloc. Certified trust service providers play a pivotal role in issuing digital certificates embedded within signature payloads, raising technical requirements for algorithmic verification. Brexit complicates UK-EU workflows, forcing vendors to maintain dual compliance stacks while promising seamless user experiences. GDPR expectations of privacy-by-design push providers to adopt federated-learning techniques, training models without exporting signature artefacts beyond jurisdictional boundaries. As a result, European buyers weigh algorithmic precision alongside demonstrable privacy safeguards, favouring vendors that deliver both.

  1. Mitek Systems Inc.
  2. Parascript LLC
  3. IBM Corp.
  4. Adobe Inc.
  5. DocuSign Inc.
  6. Ascertia Ltd
  7. Jumio Corp.
  8. Ekata Inc.
  9. Acuant Inc.
  10. SutiSoft Inc.
  11. CERTIFY Global Inc.
  12. Scriptel Corp.
  13. iSign Solutions Inc.
  14. Veriff
  15. Hitachi Ltd. (Biometric systems)
  16. HID Global (Assa Abloy)
  17. Signicat AS
  18. Topaz Systems Inc.
  19. Aratek Biometrics
  20. Biometric Signature ID

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Compliance mandates under eIDAS 2.0 and U.S. CFR Part 11
    • 4.2.2 Surge in mail in ballot signature checks post-2024 elections
    • 4.2.3 Fin-crime losses driving AI-based check-fraud analytics
    • 4.2.4 Cloud-native APIs embedded in e-signature suites
    • 4.2.5 GenAI forged-signature detection algorithms
    • 4.2.6 Indias Aadhaar linked digital signature wallets (UPI 3.0)
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Variability across capture devices and legacy silo integration
    • 4.3.2 High FRR in multicultural voter rolls sparks litigation
    • 4.3.3 Data-sovereignty limits on cross-border model training
    • 4.3.4 Patent litigation risk (e.g., MITK vs USAA)
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook (AI, edge, GenAI)
  • 4.7 Porters Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Solution Type
    • 5.1.1 Hardware
      • 5.1.1.1 Signature pads and sensors
      • 5.1.1.2 Biometric terminals / kiosks
    • 5.1.2 Software
      • 5.1.2.1 Static (offline) verification
      • 5.1.2.2 Dynamic (online) verification
      • 5.1.2.3 SDK / API platforms
  • 5.2 By Deployment Model
    • 5.2.1 On-premise
    • 5.2.2 Cloud / SaaS
  • 5.3 By Authentication Mode
    • 5.3.1 Stand-alone signature
    • 5.3.2 Multimodal (signature + doc image / ID / liveness)
  • 5.4 By End-user Industry
    • 5.4.1 Financial Services
    • 5.4.2 Government and Elections
    • 5.4.3 Healthcare
    • 5.4.4 Transport and Logistics
    • 5.4.5 Legal and Real-estate
    • 5.4.6 Other Industries
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
      • 5.5.1.1 United States
      • 5.5.1.2 Canada
      • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
      • 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
      • 5.5.2.2 Germany
      • 5.5.2.3 France
      • 5.5.2.4 Italy
      • 5.5.2.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.3.1 China
      • 5.5.3.2 Japan
      • 5.5.3.3 India
      • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
      • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East
      • 5.5.4.1 Israel
      • 5.5.4.2 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.4.3 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.4.4 Turkey
      • 5.5.4.5 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5 Africa
      • 5.5.5.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2 Egypt
      • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Africa
    • 5.5.6 South America
      • 5.5.6.1 Brazil
      • 5.5.6.2 Argentina
      • 5.5.6.3 Rest of South America

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Info, Market Rank/Share, Products and Recent Devs.)
    • 6.4.1 Mitek Systems Inc.
    • 6.4.2 Parascript LLC
    • 6.4.3 IBM Corp.
    • 6.4.4 Adobe Inc.
    • 6.4.5 DocuSign Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Ascertia Ltd
    • 6.4.7 Jumio Corp.
    • 6.4.8 Ekata Inc.
    • 6.4.9 Acuant Inc.
    • 6.4.10 SutiSoft Inc.
    • 6.4.11 CERTIFY Global Inc.
    • 6.4.12 Scriptel Corp.
    • 6.4.13 iSign Solutions Inc.
    • 6.4.14 Veriff
    • 6.4.15 Hitachi Ltd. (Biometric systems)
    • 6.4.16 HID Global (Assa Abloy)
    • 6.4.17 Signicat AS
    • 6.4.18 Topaz Systems Inc.
    • 6.4.19 Aratek Biometrics
    • 6.4.20 Biometric Signature ID

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment