Product Code: DEF0312
The MTCR will continue to be extremely important in shaping and influencing larger efforts to control the manufacture, trading, and use of missiles.
The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market (COVID-19 Impact Analysis):
The Missile Technology Control Regime is an unofficial and voluntary group of nations that seeks to coordinate national export licencing initiatives aimed at stopping the proliferation of unmanned delivery systems that can carry weapons of mass destruction. The original founding nations of the MTCR were the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Since then, the MTCR has expanded to include a total of thirty-four nations, each of which has an equal position within the Regime.
“The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market Report 2022-2032”: This report will prove invaluable to leading firms striving for new revenue pockets if they wish to better understand the industry and its underlying dynamics. It will be useful for companies that would like to expand into different industries or to expand their existing operations in a new region.
The MTCR Has Repeatedly Shown Itself to Be a Useful Tool in the Fight Against Missile Proliferation
By triggering missile programme cancellation, conversion, timetable delays, as well as an increase in development costs and part scarcity, it has been attributed with preventing the proliferation of missiles. The cancellation of two Brazilian systems (Avibras's SS series and Orbita's MB series) as well as delays in India's missile development are examples of specific victories. Formerly a target of the MTCR, Israel is now a supporter. The government is also credited with postponing China's deliveries of M-9 and M11 missiles to Pakistan and with pressuring Germany to strengthen its laws enforcing export controls. Even though it ultimately can't stop a nation from creating a missile programme, it can restrict the spread of technology.
The Problem with MTCR Membership
The majority of the top manufacturers of missile technology are now members of the MTCR, which was established in 1987 by the largest industrial governments of the Group of Seven (G7). Even a few nations that had earlier been adamantly opposed to the MTCR, including Brazil and India, later joined and are now heavily involved in its operations. However, a number of significant missile manufacturers and exporters, like Israel, do not take part in the MTCR. It is particularly important and challenging that China, which has allegedly provided significant assistance to others, including Iran and North Korea, and has transferred missile technology to a variety of recipients over the years, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey (see the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database), remains outside of the regime.
What Questions Should You Ask before Buying a Market Research Report?
- How is the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market evolving?
- What is driving and restraining the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market?
- What will be the main driver for the overall market from 2022?
- Will leading missile technology control regime (MTCR) markets broadly follow the macroeconomic dynamics, or will individual national markets outperform others?
- What are the missile technology control regime (MTCR) projects for these leading companies?
- What are the implications of missile technology control regime (MTCR) projects taking place now and over the next 10 years?
- Is there a greater need for product commercialisation to further scale the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market?
- Where is the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market heading and how can you ensure you are at the forefront of the market?
You need to discover how this will impact the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market today, and over the next 10 years:
- Our 277-page report provides 28 tables and 100 charts/graphs exclusively to you.
- The report highlights key lucrative areas in the industry so you can target them - NOW.
- It highlights for you the key successful trends, changes and revenue projections made by your competitors.
This report tells you TODAY how the missile technology control regime (MTCR) market will develop in the future. This market is more critical now than at any point over the last 10 years.
- You will find original analyses, with business outlooks and developments.
- Discover qualitative analyses (including market dynamics, drivers, opportunities, restraints and challenges), cost structure, impact of rising missile technology control regime (MTCR) prices and recent developments.
Countries mentioned below have been considered under this report:
- U.S.
- Canada
- Australia
- Russia
- South Korea
- France
- Argentina
- Brazil
- South Africa
- Japan
- Iran
- China
- India
- North Korea
- Egypt
The report also includes profiles and for some of the leading companies in the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market, 2022 to 2032, with a focus on this segment of these companies' operations.
Leading companies and the potential for market growth
- Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc.
- AeroVironment, Inc.
- Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS
- Brahmos Aerospace Limited
- China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation Limited (CASIC)
- Crane Aerospace and Electronics
- Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG,
- DRDO
- Elbit Systems
- Kongsberg Gruppen AS
- Kratos Defence& Security Solutions Inc.
- L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- Leidos Holdings, Inc. (Leidos)
- Lockheed Martin Corporation
- MBDA Holdings SAS
- Moog Inc.
- Morgan Advanced Materials
- Northrop Grumman Corporation
- Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- Rheinmetall AG
- Saab AB
- Tactical Missiles Corporation JSC (KTRV)
- Textron Inc.
- The Boeing Company
- Ultra Electronics
Our work identifies which organizations hold the greatest potential. Discover their capabilities, progress, and commercial prospects, helping you stay ahead.
How will the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market, 2022 report help you?
In summary, our 270+ page report provides you with the following knowledge:
- This report provides in detailed insights for the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) in the US, U.S., Canada, Russia, South Korea, France, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Japan, Iran, China, India, North Korea, Egypt, and Australia.
- Prospects for established firms and those seeking to enter the market - including company profiles for 25 of the major companies involved in the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), 2022.
Find quantitative and qualitative analyses with independent predictions. Receive information that only our report contains, staying informed with invaluable business intelligence.
Information found nowhere else
With our new report, you are less likely to fall behind in knowledge or miss out on opportunities. See how our work could benefit your research, analyses, and decisions. Our study is for everybody needing commercial analyses for the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market, 2022, market-leading companies. You will find data, trends and predictions.
Table of Contents
1. Report Overview
- 1.1 Objectives of the Study
- 1.2 Introduction to Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Market
- 1.3 What This Report Delivers
- 1.4 Why You Should Read This Report
- 1.5 Key Questions Answered by this Analytical Report Include:
- 1.6 Who is this Report for?
- 1.7 Methodology
- 1.8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- 1.9 Associated Reports
- 1.10 About
2 MTCR Overview
- 2.1 What is the MTCR?
- 2.2 When did the MTCR start operating?
- 2.3 Who is a member of the MTCR?
- 2.4 What is the MTCR used for?
- 2.5 What connection does the MTCR have with the UN?
- 2.6 Is the MTCR an agreement?
- 2.7 What are the MTCR's primary goals?
- 2.8 How does the MTCR accomplish its goals?
- 2.9 The MTCR Guidelines are what?
- 2.10 What does MTCR Annex mean?
- 2.11 What kind of control do Annex items have?
- 2.12 Exist any rules governing non-Annex items?
- 2.13 What distinguishes items under categories I and II of the MTCR?
- 2.14 Are exports to Partners and exports to non-Partners regulated differently?
- 2.15 Are the MTCR Guidelines enforceable?
- 2.16 What duties must Partners fulfil?
- 2.17 How are choices about export made?
- 2.18 How is adherence to rules enforced?
- 2.19 What advantages do Partners receive as MTCR members?
- 2.20 Can a nation follow the Guidelines without signing up for the MTCR?
- 2.21 Does the MTCR hold the status of an observer?
- 2.22 The MTCR Partners meet on what days and how frequently?
- 2.23 Does the MTCR have a central administrative body?
- 2.24 The Reinforced Point of Contact (RPOC) Meeting is what, exactly?
- 2.25 What is A Point of Contact (POC) Meeting?
- 2.26 The MTCR Chair's name is How do they get picked?
- 2.27 In the MTCR, how are choices made?
- 2.28 How frequently does the MTCR hold meetings with guests?
3 Global Perspective of MTCR
- 3.1 MTCR Outlook
- 3.1.1 MTCR Is A Group Of Nations With A Shared Interest In Preventing The Spread Of Missiles And Missile Technology
- 3.1.2 The MTCR Was Created with the Intention of "Reducing the Dangers of Nuclear Proliferation
- 3.1.3 MTCR Members Published A Set Of Rules Outlining The Basic Tenets Of The System And An Annex Listing The Technologies
- 3.1.4 A "Strong Presumption" To Forbid An Export Was Added In The Revised Regulations
- 3.1.5 Aiming to Prevent the Proliferation of Ballistic Missiles and Other Unmanned Delivery Systems
- 3.1.6 The MTCR Has No Consequences for Transfers Of Controlled Products
- 3.2 Operations of Organisations
- 3.2.1 MTCR Meetings
- 3.2.2 MTCR Membership
- 3.2.3 MTCR Member Adherence
- 3.2.4 MTCR Membership Rationale
- 3.2.5 Implementation
- 3.2.6 Hague Code of Conduct Against the Proliferation of Ballistic Missiles
- 3.3 Strengths of MTCR
- 3.3.1 The MTCR Has Repeatedly Shown Itself To Be A Useful Tool In The Fight Against Missile Proliferation
- 3.3.2 Several Nations Have Made Commitments To Follow The MTCR Without Actually Joining It
- 3.3.3 The MTCR Is A Key Component Of State Attempts To Limit The Creation, Spread, And Application Of Missiles
- 3.3.4 The MTCR Facilitate the Coordination and Standardisation of Export Control Operations and Regulations
- 3.3.5 The MTCR Is A Dynamic Tool, And Members Are Working To Address Some Of These Flaws
- 3.4 Weaknesses of MTCR
- 3.4.1 Operational And Current Issues Presenting Obstacles To The MTCR
- 3.4.2 Innate And Structural Difficulties in MTCR
- 3.4.3 The MTCR Has Been Accused In The Past By Several Non-Participating States
- 3.4.4 The Problem With MTCR Membership
- 3.4.5 Operational Difficulties In The MTCR
- 3.4.6 Problems Relating To Technology
- 3.5 Challenges Connected to COVID-19
- 3.6 Historical Events in MTCR
- 3.6.1 MTCR in 2020
- 3.6.2 MTCR in 2018
- 3.6.3 MTCR in 2017
- 3.6.4 MTCR in 2016
- 3.6.5 MTCR in 2015
- 3.6.6 MTCR in 2014
- 3.6.7 MTCR in 2013
- 3.6.8 MTCR in 2012
- 3.6.9 MTCR in 2011
- 3.6.10 MTCR in 2010
- 3.6.11 MTCR in 2009
- 3.6.12 MTCR in 2008
- 3.6.13 MTCR in 2007
- 3.6.14 MTCR in 2006
4 Russia-Ukraine War Impact
- 4.1 Russia-Ukraine Updates
- 4.1.1 Missile Programmes Are Developing Unrestrictedly In The Absence Of A Regional Conversation
- 4.1.2 Russia Has Used More Than 2,200 Missiles Against Ukraine
- 4.1.3 Ukraine Now Has A Fresh Wish List Of Weapons It Hopes Will Be Pivotal
- 4.1.4 The U.S. And Germany Promised To Provide Ukraine With Some Of The Cutting-Edge Weapons
- 4.1.5 Western Weapons Have Proven Essential To Ukraine's Ability
- 4.1.6 Russian Defense Ministry Pledged To Increase Missile Attacks On Kiev In Retaliation
- 4.1.7 The Withdrawal Of The Moskva Decreases Russia's Firepower In The Black Sea
- 4.1.8 Pentagon Had Postponed A Nuclear Missile Test Launch Set
- 4.1.9 To Help Ukraine Target Russian Aviation, The Slovakian Government Has Decided To Send Ukraine Its Lone S-300 Surface-To-Air System
5 U.S.
- 5.1 the United States will implement the 35-nation Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)
- 5.2 The two kinds of weaponry are separated by the MTCR
- 5.3 Recent Developments in the Country
- 5.3.1 The United Arab Emirates And The U.S. Military Intercepted Two Ballistic Missiles Fired Over Abu Dhabi By Yemen's Houthi Rebels
- 5.3.2 The Pentagon Is Now Looking To Test Equipment That Might Potentially Protect American Cities
- 5.3.3 The U.S. State Department Has Cleared The Prospective Sale Of HIMARS Rocket Systems To Estonia, Missiles To Norway, And Torpedoes To South Korea
- 5.3.4 US Enters the Hypersonic Race
- 5.3.5 Hypersonic Missiles from NASA
- 5.3.6 The US Successfully Tested A Hypersonic Missile In The Middle Of March 2022
6 Canada
- 6.1 Canada Has Committed $4.9 billion Over Six Years to NORAD Modernization
7 Australia
- 7.1 Australia hosted the 2008 Missile Technology Control Regime Plenary in Canberra
- 7.2 Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) Trilateral Defence Collaboration
8 Russia
- 8.1 Russia Successfully Tested A Hypersonic Zircon Cruise Missile Over A Distance Of Around 1,000 Km
- 8.2 First Successful Test Firing Of A Potential Russian Hypersonic Missile From A Nuclear Submarine
9 South Korea
- 9.1 South Korea Launched Its First Satellite Successfully Using A Home-grown Rocket
- 9.2 South Korea Became The Tenth Country In The World To Successfully Launch A Satellite Using Homegrown Technology
- 9.3 South Korea Plans To Launch Four More Nuri Satellites
- 9.4 South Korea Is Likewise Speeding Up Its Military Build-Up
- 9.5 South Korea Has Relied On Prolonged Deterrence From The American Nuclear Umbrella To Resist North Korea's Nuclear Threats
- 9.6 South Korea Is Currently Pursuing The So-Called Three-Pronged Defence Policy
10 France
- 10.1 France actively participates in the Missile Technology Control Regime
- 10.2 France, A Steadfast Supporter Of India's Membership
11 Argentina
12 Brazil
13 South Africa
- 13.1 South Africa Has Decades Of Experience Developing Missile And Rocket Technology
- 13.2 South Africa Developed The Republic Of South Africa (RSA) Missile Series
- 13.3 It Is Unclear When South Africa Started Working On Ballistic Missiles
14 Japan
- 14.1 Japan Does Not Have A Ballistic Missile Development Programme
15 Iran
- 15.1 Iran Stepped Up Its Efforts To Acquire Illegal Nuclear Missile Technology
16 Israel
- 16.1 New Israeli-Made Missile Was Displayed At The Eurosatory Defence Expo In Paris
- 16.2 Iran May Have Been The Source Of The Cyberattack That Led To Erroneous Reports Of Missile Assaults
- 16.3 An American Plea For Israel To Grant Berlin Permission To Give Ukraine Anti-Tank Missiles
17 China: In or Out of MTCR?
- 17.1 Chinese Missile Technology Transfers Continue To Raise Concerns For MRTC Members
- 17.2 Export Restrictions Imposed By China On Missiles, Missile-Related Technologies, And MTCR
- 17.3 The Present Export Control Regulations And Practises Stand In Stark Contrast To China's Prior Export Rules For Missiles
- 17.4 MTCR Continues To Be A Significant Roadblock For China
- 17.5 China Is Continuing To Create New Ballistic Missile Technology Including Highly Precise Cruise Missiles
- 17.6 China Successfully Conducted An Anti-Ballistic Missile Test
- 17.7 China Has Conducted Five Midcourse Anti-Ballistic Missile Tests
- 17.8 China Might Also Be Keeping A Watch Out For Any Potential New Threats Coming From Other Asian Nations
- 17.9 Air Defence System Driven By AI In China Can Track Hypersonic Missiles
- 17.10 China Has Been Working On Anti-Ship Missiles For A Long Time
18 India
- 18.1 India Has Become A Member Of A Select Group Of Nations That Regulate Missile Technology Exports
- 18.2 India's Membership Of MTCR Affects Strategic Balance In South Asia Particularly
- 18.3 India Won't Have Its First Hypersonic Missiles For Five To Six Years
- 18.4 Beyond Visual Range (BVR) Class Air-To-Air Missile Developed By India
- 18.5 Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) And Larsen And Toubro (L&T) Jointly Delivered The 100th Akash Air Force Launcher (AAFL)
19 North Korea Missile Market
- 19.1 North Korea Resumed Weapons Testing
- 19.2 North Korea's Modernization of Conventional Weapons
- 19.3 There Will Be An Ongoing, Unrestrained Arms Race On The Korean Peninsula
- 19.4 Rapid Missile Testing by North Korea
- 19.4.1 North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un Launched A Ballistic Missile Toward Its Eastern Waters
- 19.4.2 North Korean Government, Oversaw Successful Flight Test Of A Hypersonic Missile By North Korea
- 19.4.3 The North Korea Is Believed To Have Fired Suspected Artillery Pieces Into The Sea
- 19.4.4 North Korea Launched A Manoeuvrable Re-entry Vehicle With A Conical Form That Was Pushed By A Liquid-Fuel Booster,
- 19.5 To Intimidate The United States, North Korea Is Improving Its Nuclear And Missile Capabilities
20 Egypt
- 20.1 The Missile Technology Control Regime Does Not Include Egypt
21 Future Outlook of MTCR
- 21.1 Steps to take and the MTCR's future course
- 21.1.1 Introducing New Initiatives And Boosting Resilience
- 21.1.2 The MTCR Is The Primary Supply-Side Non-Proliferation Mechanism In The Field Of Missiles
- 21.2 Considering The Future
- 21.2.1 The MTCR Buys Time Against Further Proliferation Of Missiles By Slowing The Dispersion Of Missile Technology
- 21.2.2 Certain Aspects Need To Be Taken Into Account When Re-Evaluating The Regime
- 21.2.3 Additional Non-Proliferation Or Confidence-Building Regimes Offer A Wealth Of Information
- 21.2.4 Suggesting A Stronger Sense Of National Commitment And Responsibility
- 21.2.5 Technology Protection With Currently Accessible Methods Can Prove To Be A Challenging Task
- 21.2.6 The MTCR Must Develop Into A Confidence-Boosting Tool In And Of Itself (CBM)
- 21.2.7 The MTCR Has The Potential To Have A Considerable Impact On The Development Of The Global Space And Dual-Use Technology Sectors
- 21.3 Operations Across Multiple Domains And The Future
- 21.4 The Cruise Missiles Concern
- 21.5 The Hypersonic Threat: Countering
22 Company Profiles
- 22.1 Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc.
- 22.1.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.1.2 Company Overview
- 22.1.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.1.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.1.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.2 The Boeing Company
- 22.2.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.2.2 Company Overview
- 22.2.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.2.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.2.5 Recent Developments
- 22.3 Brahmos Aerospace Limited
- 22.3.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.3.2 Company Overview
- 22.3.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.3.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.3.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.4 China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation Limited (CASIC)
- 22.4.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.4.2 Company Overview
- 22.4.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.4.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.4.5 Recent Developments
- 22.5 Elbit Systems
- 22.5.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.5.2 Company Overview
- 22.5.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.5.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.5.5 Recent Developments
- 22.6 Kratos Defence& Security Solutions Inc.
- 22.6.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.6.2 Company Overview
- 22.6.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.6.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.6.5 Recent Developments
- 22.7 Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 22.7.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.7.2 Company Overview
- 22.7.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.7.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.7.5 Recent Developments
- 22.8 MBDA Holdings SAS
- 22.8.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.8.2 Company Overview
- 22.8.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.8.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.8.5 Recent Developments
- 22.9 Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 22.9.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.9.2 Company Overview
- 22.9.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.9.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.9.5 Recent Developments
- 22.10 Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 22.10.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.10.2 Company Overview
- 22.10.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.10.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.10.5 Recent Developments
- 22.11 Saab AB
- 22.11.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.11.2 Company Overview
- 22.11.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.11.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.11.5 Recent Developments
- 22.12 Tactical Missiles Corporation JSC (KTRV)
- 22.12.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.12.2 Company Overview
- 22.12.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.12.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.12.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.13 DRDO
- 22.13.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.13.2 Company Overview
- 22.13.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.13.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.13.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.14 Kongsberg Gruppen AS
- 22.14.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.14.2 Company Overview
- 22.14.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.14.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.14.5 Recent Developments
- 22.15 Leidos
- 22.15.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.15.2 Company Overview
- 22.15.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.15.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.15.5 Recent Developments
- 22.16 AeroVironment, Inc.
- 22.16.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.16.2 Company Overview
- 22.16.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.16.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.16.5 Recent Developments
- 22.17 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 22.17.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.17.2 Company Overview
- 22.17.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.17.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.17.5 Recent Developments
- 22.18 Aselsan
- 22.18.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.18.2 Company Overview
- 22.18.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.18.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.18.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.19 Ultra Electronics
- 22.19.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.19.2 Company Overview
- 22.19.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.19.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.19.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.20 Textron Inc.
- 22.20.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.20.2 Company Overview
- 22.20.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.20.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.20.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.21 Rheinmetall AG
- 22.21.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.21.2 Company Overview
- 22.21.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.21.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.21.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.22 Morgan Advanced Materials
- 22.22.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.22.2 Company Overview
- 22.22.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.22.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.22.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.23 Moog Inc.
- 22.23.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.23.2 Company Overview
- 22.23.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.23.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.23.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.24 Crane Aerospace and Electronics
- 22.24.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.24.2 Company Overview
- 22.24.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.24.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.24.5 Strategic Outlook
- 22.25 Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG,
- 22.25.1 Company Snapshot
- 22.25.2 Company Overview
- 22.25.3 Financial Analysis
- 22.25.4 Product Benchmarking
- 22.25.5 Strategic Outlook
23 Conclusion and Recommendations
- 23.1 Concluding Remarks from