封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2148210

人工智慧加速器先進半導體封裝市場規模、佔有率及成長預測(2026-2032 年)

Advanced Semiconductor Packaging for AI Accelerators Market Size, Share & Growth Forecast (2026-2032)

出版日期: | 出版商: Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence | 英文 145 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

2026年,人工智慧加速器先進半導體封裝市場規模估計為128億美元,預計到2032年將達到354億美元。這意味著從2026年到2032年,複合年成長率將達到18.5%。

先進封裝技術已從後端製造流程發展成為系統擴展技術,定義了最先進人工智慧加速器的性能極限。現代人工智慧加速器封裝可能包含多個邏輯晶片、多個高頻寬記憶體堆疊以及數萬個高速互連,這些互連透過矽中介層、線路重布或嵌入式橋接器連接。其戰略目標是在保持晶片可製造性的同時,縮短計算單元和記憶體之間的物理距離,即使這些晶片可能採用不同的製程節點。這使得加速器供應商能夠在不依賴單一晶片的情況下擴展運算能力和記憶體頻寬,因為單一晶片可能在經濟上不切實際,或者無法以所需的尺寸進行製造。推動市場發展的三大結構性因素是:首先,人工智慧加速器正在突破單晶片的實際限制,促使設計人員轉向依賴先進封裝技術的晶片組架構,以實現接近單晶片的性能;其次,隨著高頻寬記憶體的數量和頻寬需求不斷成長,封裝整合度也在逐代提高。第三,超大規模資料中心業者和通用半導體製造商的客製化AI晶片專案正在拓展基本客群,使其不再局限於少數圖形處理器平台。亞太地區仍然是最大的製造區域,這得益於其高度集中的晶圓代工廠、外包組裝和測試、記憶體以及製造設備。北美是最大的設計和終端用戶區域,隨著AI客戶對地理分散型供應鏈的需求,其製造能力正在迅速擴張。

市場促進因素

  • 人工智慧加速器正在挑戰單晶片的極限。隨著晶片面積的增加,最先進邏輯晶片的成本也在穩定上升,因為單一缺陷可能會降低整個大型處理器的良率。晶片組架構允許設計人員將運算、I/O、快取和其他功能分配到多個晶片上,並將它們重新整合到單一封裝中。因此,先進的封裝技術是將多個小型晶片整合到接近單晶片性能的系統中的關鍵機制。英特爾顯然正在利用EMIB和Foveros技術突破傳統光罩的限制,擴大封裝尺寸;而台積電則正在將CoWoS技術擴展到多光罩封裝,以用於未來的人工智慧系統。這進一步提高了封裝整合層在半導體總價值中所佔的比例。
  • 高頻寬記憶體模組的數量和頻寬不斷成長,提高了封裝整合度。對高頻寬記憶體的需求不僅增加了記憶體收入,也增加了必須與加速器整合的高密度介面的數量。未來的人工智慧封裝正朝著更大的記憶體堆疊、更寬的介面和更大的中介層發展。台積電已公佈了一種14光罩尺寸的CoWoS配置方案,到2028年,該方案將能夠整合大約10個大型計算晶片和20個高頻寬記憶體堆疊。每增加一個邏輯晶片或記憶體堆疊,都會增加佈線密度、翹曲風險、熱相互作用、組裝製程和測試要求。即使每個連接的製造成本降低,這也增加了封裝的附加價值。
  • 客製化AI晶片正在擴大封裝產業的基本客群。市場不再僅由NVIDIA和AMD主導。超大規模資料中心業者和通用半導體製造商正在擴展其用於訓練、推理和聯網的客製化AI ASIC專案。這些產品通常採用高頻寬記憶體和異質整合,但在中介層尺寸、基板佈局、電源解決方案和散熱設計要求方面可能有所不同。加速器架構的多樣化增加了認證工作量,但也為客戶利用封裝能力提供了更大的靈活性,前提是供應商能夠滿足多種設計規則和整合流程。這將鼓勵代工廠和半導體組裝測試承包商投資於靈活、先進的封裝平台。
  • 地理分散化正在創造重疊和額外的生產能力。人工智慧客戶對先進封裝的需求日益成長,他們希望在靠近尖端晶圓製造地的多個地點獲得先進封裝服務。安姆科正在亞利桑那州建設一個高產能的先進封裝園區,並已將其計畫投資額擴大到2026年9月前的約120億美元。台積電和安姆科也宣佈在美國建立長期合作夥伴關係,而英特爾正在新墨西哥州擴大其先進封裝能力。這些投資並非取代亞洲的生產能力,而是增加了戰略製造選擇和認證項目,提高了行業的資本密集度,並支持了目標封裝服務市場的發展。

市場限制因素

  • 先進的人工智慧封裝製程良率風險極高,因為最終封裝可能包含多個昂貴的邏輯晶片或多個高頻寬記憶體堆疊。因此,如果在組裝的最後階段出現缺陷,其造成的價值損失將遠大於傳統的單晶片封裝。大型中介層和基板也面臨翹曲、熱膨脹係數不匹配和電源供應等挑戰。混合鍵合需要極其平整潔淨的表面和精確的晶片放置。雖然產能的提升最終有望降低價格和前置作業時間,但每推出一代新技術都需要學習新的製程。此外,該市場極易受到架構變化的影響。諸如局部矽橋、線路重布中介層、面板級封裝和晶圓級系統等替代技術,不僅有可能增加傳統的CoWoS(晶片封裝)收入,還有可能改變製程步驟之間的價值分配。

目錄

第1章執行摘要

  • 市場機會與主要發現
  • 包裝技術的演變
  • 主要收入來源

第2章 市場概覽

  • 從單一整體到異質一體化的演變
  • AI加速器軟體包架構
  • HBM整合與封裝小型化
  • 代工廠、OSAT 和設備生態系統

第3章 市場規模及預測(2026-2032 年)

  • 全球市場收益
  • 年增率分析
  • 每個人工智慧加速器的包裝價值
  • 產能擴張對產量的影響

第4章 市場:依整合架構分類

  • 2.5D 矽膠中介層封裝
  • 重新分層和扇出整合
  • 嵌入式矽橋架構
  • 3D分層和混合鍵合
  • 面板級和大尺寸包裝

第5章 市場:按包裝工藝

  • 晶圓凸塊與重新分佈
  • 中介層和橋接器整合
  • 晶片黏接和高精度安裝
  • 穿透矽通孔(TSV)的整合
  • 混合鍵合
  • 組裝、底部填充和封裝
  • 進階測試和系統檢驗

第6章 市場:依加速器類型分類

  • GPU加速器
  • 客製化人工智慧專用積體電路
  • 高效能運算處理器
  • 網路與專用加速器

第7章 市場:依供應商模式分類

  • 晶圓代工整合先進封裝
  • 半導體組裝和檢測外包服務供應商
  • 垂直整合的設備製造商
  • 包裝設備和製程生態系統

第8章 區域市場

  • 亞太地區
    • 台灣
    • 韓國
    • 中國
    • 日本
    • 東南亞
  • 北美洲
    • 美國
  • 歐洲
  • 世界其他地區

第9章 市場動態

  • 促進因素
    • 採用晶片組和光罩限制帶來的限制
    • 增加HBM的數量和頻寬
    • 客製化人工智慧專用積體電路的成長
    • 生產能力的地理分散性
  • 抑制因子
    • 產量風險和“已知良好模具”的要求
    • 翹曲和熱機械複雜性
    • 生產能力和設備瓶頸
    • 快速架構遷移

第10章:技術展望

  • 多十字線 2.5D 包裝
  • 混合鍵結和細間距3D整合
  • 面板級包裝
  • 玻璃芯和玻璃載體技術
  • 電源和散熱設計的先進整合
  • 封裝級協同設計與數位孿生

第11章 競爭格局

  • 價值鏈
  • 代工廠封裝平台
  • OSAT的先進封裝平台
  • 設備和製程控制
  • 擴大產能並加強客戶夥伴關係

第12章:公司簡介

  • TSMC
  • ASE Technology Holding
  • Amkor Technology
  • Intel Foundry
  • Samsung Electronics
  • JCET Group
  • Powertech Technology
  • Tongfu Microelectronics
  • Applied Materials
  • Lam Research
  • BE Semiconductor Industries
  • ASMPT
  • KLA Corporation
  • Onto Innovation
  • Tokyo Electron

第13章 近期趨勢

第14章附錄

簡介目錄
Product Code: KSI-009255

The Advanced Semiconductor Packaging for AI Accelerators Market is estimated at USD 12.8 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach USD 35.4 billion by 2032, representing a CAGR of 18.5% during 2026-2032.

Advanced packaging has evolved from a back-end manufacturing step into a system-scaling technology that determines the performance envelope of leading AI accelerators. A modern AI accelerator package can contain several logic dies, multiple high-bandwidth memory stacks and tens of thousands of high-speed interconnects across a silicon interposer, redistribution layer or embedded bridge. The strategic objective is to reduce the physical distance between compute and memory while preserving manufacturability across dies that may use different process nodes. This allows accelerator suppliers to scale compute and memory bandwidth without relying on a single die that becomes uneconomic or impossible to manufacture at the required size. Three structural forces drive the market. First, AI accelerators are exceeding the practical limits of monolithic dies, pushing designers toward chiplet architectures that depend on advanced packaging to deliver near-monolithic performance. Second, high-bandwidth memory count and bandwidth requirements are increasing package integration intensity with each generation. Third, custom AI silicon programs at hyperscalers and merchant semiconductor companies are broadening the customer base beyond a handful of graphics processor platforms. Asia Pacific remains the largest manufacturing region through foundry, outsourced assembly and test, memory and equipment concentration. North America is the largest design and end-demand region and is adding manufacturing capacity rapidly as AI customers seek geographically diversified supply.

Market Drivers

  • AI accelerators are exceeding the practical limits of monolithic dies. Leading-edge logic becomes progressively more expensive as die area increases because a single defect can reduce the yield of an entire large processor. Chiplet architectures allow designers to divide compute, input and output, cache and other functions across several dies, then reconnect them within one package. Advanced packaging therefore becomes the mechanism that converts multiple smaller dies into a system with near-monolithic performance. Intel is explicitly scaling packages beyond conventional reticle limits using EMIB and Foveros, while TSMC is expanding CoWoS to multi-reticle formats for future AI systems. This shifts a larger share of total semiconductor value into the package-integration layer.
  • High-bandwidth memory count and bandwidth increase package integration intensity. High-bandwidth memory demand does more than increase memory revenue. It also raises the number of high-density interfaces that must be integrated beside the accelerator. Future AI packages are moving toward more memory stacks, wider interfaces and larger interposers. TSMC has outlined a 14-reticle-size CoWoS configuration capable of integrating approximately ten large compute dies and twenty high-bandwidth memory stacks by 2028. Each additional logic die or memory stack increases routing density, warpage risk, thermal interaction, assembly steps and test requirements. This supports higher packaging value even when manufacturing cost per connection declines.
  • Custom AI silicon broadens the package customer base. The market is no longer driven only by NVIDIA and AMD. Hyperscalers and merchant semiconductor companies are expanding custom AI ASIC programs for training, inference and networking. These products frequently use high-bandwidth memory and heterogeneous integration but can require different interposer dimensions, substrate layouts, power-delivery solutions and thermal envelopes. A broader set of accelerator architectures increases qualification work and makes packaging capacity more fungible across customers only when suppliers can support multiple design rules and integration flows. This supports investment by foundries and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers in flexible advanced-packaging platforms.
  • Geographic diversification is adding duplicate and incremental capacity. AI customers increasingly want advanced packaging closer to leading-edge wafer fabrication and in more than one geography. Amkor is developing a high-volume United States advanced packaging campus in Arizona and expanded the planned investment to approximately USD 12 billion in September 2026. TSMC and Amkor also announced a long-term United States partnership, while Intel is expanding advanced packaging capability in New Mexico. These investments do not replace Asian capacity. They add strategic manufacturing options and qualification programs, increasing industry capital intensity and supporting the addressable packaging-services market.

Market Restraints

  • Advanced AI packaging carries unusually high yield risk because a finished package can contain several expensive logic dies and multiple high-bandwidth memory stacks. A defect introduced late in assembly can therefore destroy much more value than in a conventional single-die package. Large interposers and substrates also face warpage, thermal-expansion mismatch and power-delivery challenges. Hybrid bonding requires exceptionally flat, clean surfaces and accurate die placement. Capacity expansion can eventually reduce price and lead times, but each new generation introduces fresh process learning. The market is also exposed to architecture changes. Alternatives such as local silicon bridges, redistribution-layer interposers, panel-level packaging and wafer-scale systems can shift value between process steps rather than simply increase conventional CoWoS-type revenue.

Technology and Segment Insights

  • 2.5D interposer and bridge integration represents the largest 2026 revenue pool because most high-volume AI accelerators pair logic and high-bandwidth memory side by side on a silicon interposer, redistribution layer or embedded bridge. CoWoS, I-Cube, FOCoS and EMIB-based architectures are established across current AI and high-performance computing platforms. TSMC states that CoWoS-L and CoWoS-R support package sizes beyond 3.3 times the reticle area, while its 2026 roadmap extends toward much larger multi-reticle formats. These platforms are increasingly paired with local silicon bridges, redistribution layers and advanced package substrates to manage routing, mechanical stress and power delivery as package dimensions expand.
  • Three-dimensional stacked integration is expected to grow faster through 2032 as hybrid bonding and active base-die approaches move into more logic and memory applications. Intel Foveros Direct uses copper-to-copper hybrid bonding for dense die stacking, while TSMC SoIC and Samsung X-Cube pursue similar vertical integration pathways. Hybrid bonding reduces interconnect pitch and energy per bit compared with conventional microbumps, making it attractive for logic-on-logic, logic-on-base-die and future memory integration. Commercial adoption remains smaller than 2.5D packaging in 2026 because alignment accuracy, surface preparation, known-good-die requirements and yield learning are demanding. The transition is gradual because 2.5D architectures continue scaling to much larger package sizes and remain sufficient for many accelerator roadmaps.
  • Package scale is also changing manufacturing formats. ASE announced an automated 310 millimetre square panel-level line supporting FOCoS and FOCoS-Bridge, with production planned for the first half of 2027. A square panel can use area more efficiently than a round wafer for very large packages, potentially reducing cost as interposer size expands. At the same time, glass-core and glass-carrier technologies are being evaluated because they can offer dimensional stability and routing advantages for larger packages. Intel and Lens Technology announced a 2026 collaboration focused on glass-based advanced packaging for AI and data-center workloads. Fan-out and redistribution-layer integration plus panel-level and large-format packaging form an emerging category that is accelerating as the industry seeks to reduce interposer cost and improve material utilization.
  • By accelerator type, graphics processing unit accelerators form the largest packaging demand segment in 2026 because they account for the majority of high-end deployed AI compute using multi-die logic and high-bandwidth memory. Custom AI ASICs are expected to expand faster through 2032 as hyperscalers and semiconductor companies develop dedicated training and inference silicon. High-performance computing processors, networking accelerators and other specialized compute devices form a smaller but technically important segment where advanced package architecture can be equally demanding even at lower unit volumes.
  • By packaging process, the market spans wafer bump and redistribution, interposer and bridge integration, die attach and high-accuracy placement, through-silicon via integration, hybrid bonding, assembly with underfill and encapsulation, and advanced test and system validation. By provider model, the market covers foundry-integrated advanced packaging, outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers, integrated device manufacturers, and the packaging equipment and process ecosystem.

Competitive and Strategic Outlook

  • The competitive structure differs from conventional outsourced assembly because foundries now control many of the highest-value AI packaging platforms. TSMC combines leading-edge logic with CoWoS and SoIC, allowing customers to qualify wafer fabrication and packaging within one manufacturing ecosystem. Intel Foundry positions EMIB and Foveros as an open heterogeneous-integration platform, while Samsung combines foundry, memory and package technologies. These integrated suppliers compete on package size, interconnect density, high-bandwidth memory compatibility, yield learning and the ability to coordinate front-end and back-end process roadmaps.
  • Outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers are expanding into higher-value AI packages rather than remaining concentrated in mature assembly. ASE is scaling FOCoS, bridge and panel-level architectures and investing in high-end test. Amkor is using customer-backed United States expansion and partnerships with NVIDIA and TSMC to move further into leading AI packaging. JCET, Powertech Technology, Tongfu Microelectronics and other Asian suppliers participate across flip-chip, wafer-level, system-in-package and advanced test, although the most demanding AI accelerator flows remain concentrated among a smaller set of qualified providers.
  • Equipment suppliers are increasingly strategic participants because package yield depends on processes that resemble front-end wafer manufacturing. Applied Materials is introducing chemical mechanical planarization, deposition and eBeam systems specifically for advanced packaging and high-bandwidth memory. Lam Research is expanding copper deposition and other process technology for 3D interconnects, while BE Semiconductor Industries and ASMPT participate in high-accuracy die attach and hybrid-bonding equipment. KLA and Onto Innovation provide inspection and metrology needed to control increasingly tight process windows. Competitive advantage therefore depends not only on assembly capacity but on the complete manufacturing ecosystem around bonding, planarization, interconnect formation, inspection and test.
  • Recent developments confirm accelerating capacity and technology investment. In September 2026, Amkor expanded the planned investment in its Arizona advanced packaging and test campus to approximately USD 12 billion after customer commitments exceeded the initial phase capacity. In July 2026, Intel Foundry detailed how Foveros, EMIB and EMIB-T are being used to scale multi-chip AI packages beyond conventional reticle limits. Intel and Lens Technology announced collaboration on glass-based advanced packaging technologies for future AI and data-center workloads. Amkor and NVIDIA announced a USD 1.5 billion multi-year advanced packaging and development agreement supporting next-generation AI infrastructure. In June 2026, Applied Materials introduced new planarization, deposition and eBeam process-control systems designed for high-bandwidth memory and advanced AI packaging. TSMC and Amkor announced a long-term partnership to accelerate advanced packaging and test capability in the United States. In May 2026, ASE announced the development of an industry-first automated 310 millimetre by 310 millimetre panel-level packaging production line.
  • Asia Pacific remains the largest market because the region combines leading-edge wafer fabrication, memory manufacturing, advanced packaging, substrate production and assembly equipment. Taiwan is the centre of CoWoS and a major outsourced assembly cluster through TSMC, ASE and Powertech Technology. South Korea combines high-bandwidth memory production with Samsung advanced packaging and a dense semiconductor materials ecosystem. China has expanded outsourced assembly capacity through JCET, Tongfu Microelectronics and other domestic suppliers, although access to leading-edge tools and customer qualifications varies by process. Japan contributes critical materials, equipment and emerging glass or advanced-substrate technologies. North America is the largest design and end-demand region and is adding manufacturing capacity quickly. Europe remains smaller in production volume but is important in semiconductor equipment, metrology, research and high-performance-computing demand. Through 2032, Asia Pacific is expected to remain dominant in manufacturing even as the United States captures a larger share of incremental high-end packaging investment.

Conclusion

  • The advanced semiconductor packaging for AI accelerators market is positioned for sustained expansion, growing from USD 12.8 billion in 2026 to USD 35.4 billion by 2032 at a compound annual growth rate of 18.5 percent. The market is transitioning from 2.5D interposer and bridge architectures toward deeper three-dimensional integration, panel-level formats and glass-based substrates. Foundry-integrated packaging leads current high-end AI deployments, while outsourced assembly capacity is expanding rapidly with substantial geographic diversification into the United States. Success will depend on yield learning, known-good-die discipline, thermal and mechanical control at larger package sizes, and the ability to coordinate front-end wafer fabrication with back-end assembly and test. Suppliers that combine process control, inspection, bonding and test capabilities across a broad ecosystem are best positioned to capture value as packaging becomes the primary mechanism for scaling AI system performance.

Key Benefits of this Report

  • Insightful Analysis: Detailed market insights across regions, customer segments, policies, socio-economic factors, consumer preferences, and industry verticals.
  • Competitive Landscape: Understand strategic moves by key players to identify optimal market entry approaches.
  • Market Drivers and Future Trends: Assess major growth forces and emerging developments shaping the market.
  • Actionable Recommendations: Support strategic decisions to unlock new revenue streams.
  • Caters to a Wide Audience: Suitable for startups, research institutions, consultants, SMEs, and large enterprises.

What Businesses Use Our Reports For

  • Industry and market insights, opportunity assessment, product demand forecasting, market entry strategy, geographical expansion, capital investment decisions, regulatory analysis, new product development, and competitive intelligence.

Report Coverage

  • Historical data from 2021 to 2024, Base year 2025, and Forecast years from 2026 to 2032
  • Growth opportunities, challenges, supply chain outlook, regulatory framework, and trend analysis
  • Competitive positioning, strategies, and market share evaluation, and trade analysis
  • Revenue growth and forecast assessment across segments and regions
  • Company profiling including strategies, products, financials, and key developments

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Opportunity and Key Findings
  • 1.2. Packaging Technology Transition
  • 1.3. Principal Revenue Pools

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Evolution from Monolithic Dies to Heterogeneous Integration
  • 2.2. AI Accelerator Package Architecture
  • 2.3. HBM Integration and Package Scaling
  • 2.4. Foundry, OSAT and Equipment Ecosystem

3. Market Size and Forecast, 2026-2032

  • 3.1. Global Market Revenue
  • 3.2. Annual Growth Analysis
  • 3.3. Packaging Value per AI Accelerator
  • 3.4. Capacity Expansion and Yield Effects

4. Market by Integration Architecture

  • 4.1. 2.5D Silicon Interposer Packaging
  • 4.2. Redistribution-Layer and Fan-Out Integration
  • 4.3. Embedded Silicon Bridge Architectures
  • 4.4. 3D Stacking and Hybrid Bonding
  • 4.5. Panel-Level and Large-Format Packaging

5. Market by Packaging Process

  • 5.1. Wafer Bump and Redistribution
  • 5.2. Interposer and Bridge Integration
  • 5.3. Die Attach and High-Accuracy Placement
  • 5.4. Through-Silicon Via Integration
  • 5.5. Hybrid Bonding
  • 5.6. Assembly, Underfill and Encapsulation
  • 5.7. Advanced Test and System Validation

6. Market by Accelerator Type

  • 6.1. GPU Accelerators
  • 6.2. Custom AI ASICs
  • 6.3. HPC Processors
  • 6.4. Networking and Specialized Accelerators

7. Market by Provider Model

  • 7.1. Foundry-Integrated Advanced Packaging
  • 7.2. Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test Providers
  • 7.3. Integrated Device Manufacturers
  • 7.4. Packaging Equipment and Process Ecosystem

8. Regional Market

  • 8.1. Asia Pacific
    • 8.1.1. Taiwan
    • 8.1.2. South Korea
    • 8.1.3. China
    • 8.1.4. Japan
    • 8.1.5. Southeast Asia
  • 8.2. North America
    • 8.2.1. United States
  • 8.3. Europe
  • 8.4. Rest of World

9. Market Dynamics

  • 9.1. Drivers
    • 9.1.1. Chiplet Adoption and Reticle-Limit Constraints
    • 9.1.2. Rising HBM Count and Bandwidth
    • 9.1.3. Custom AI ASIC Growth
    • 9.1.4. Geographic Capacity Diversification
  • 9.2. Restraints
    • 9.2.1. Yield Risk and Known-Good-Die Requirements
    • 9.2.2. Warpage and Thermal-Mechanical Complexity
    • 9.2.3. Capacity and Equipment Bottlenecks
    • 9.2.4. Rapid Architecture Transitions

10. Technology Outlook

  • 10.1. Multi-Reticle 2.5D Packaging
  • 10.2. Hybrid Bonding and Fine-Pitch 3D Integration
  • 10.3. Panel-Level Packaging
  • 10.4. Glass-Core and Glass-Carrier Technologies
  • 10.5. Advanced Power Delivery and Thermal Integration
  • 10.6. Package-Level Co-Design and Digital Twins

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Value Chain
  • 11.2. Foundry Packaging Platforms
  • 11.3. OSAT Advanced Packaging Platforms
  • 11.4. Equipment and Process Control
  • 11.5. Capacity Expansion and Customer Partnerships

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. TSMC
  • 12.2. ASE Technology Holding
  • 12.3. Amkor Technology
  • 12.4. Intel Foundry
  • 12.5. Samsung Electronics
  • 12.6. JCET Group
  • 12.7. Powertech Technology
  • 12.8. Tongfu Microelectronics
  • 12.9. Applied Materials
  • 12.10. Lam Research
  • 12.11. BE Semiconductor Industries
  • 12.12. ASMPT
  • 12.13. KLA Corporation
  • 12.14. Onto Innovation
  • 12.15. Tokyo Electron

13. Recent Developments

14. Appendix