封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
2126483

病患定位系統市場:策略性洞察與預測(2026-2031 年)

Patient Positioning Systems Market - Strategic Insights and Forecasts (2026-2031)

出版日期: | 出版商: Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence | 英文 141 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

預計患者定位系統市場將維持 4.04% 的複合年成長率,從 2025 年的 16.59 億美元成長到 2031 年的 21.05 億美元。

受微創手術和影像導引手術的普及、全球癌症發病率的上升以及醫院對混合手術室和先進影像基礎設施投資增加的推動,患者體位系統市場正經歷著顯著的變革。這一市場演變的特點是,人們日益認知到,精準、穩定且針對特定手術的患者體位對於提高手術、影像和放射治療的精確度、患者安全性和工作流程效率至關重要。臨床證據、技術創新和醫療基礎設施的現代化正在推動模組化體位平台和專用配件在醫院、門診手術中心和診斷檢查室的廣泛應用。外科醫生、放射科醫生和放射腫瘤科醫生在評估體位系統時,不僅關注其機械性能,還關注其與影像系統的兼容性、感染控制、模組化設計、人體工學調節以及與手術和影像工作流程的整合。手術全期護理師協會 (AORN) 持續強調標準化的體位方案和壓力分佈,以減少壓瘡和體位相關併發症,從而增強設備投資的臨床安全性證據。市場對碳纖維檯面、電動定位機構、輕型模組化配件和抗菌表面進行了大量投資,患者定位系統被視為手術室和影像現代化策略的關鍵組成部分。

市場促進因素

  • 微創手術和影像導引手術的普及是推動患者體位擺放系統市場發展的主要動力。微創手術在手術室實踐中日益重要,因為它能夠縮短恢復時間、降低併發症發生率並縮短住院時間。這些手術需要精準且可重複的患者體位擺放,以確保手術部位的可及性,同時也要與透視、內視鏡和機器人影像系統相容。製造商正透過推出模組化手術台和體位擺放配件來應對這項挑戰,這些配件無需對現有設備進行大規模改造即可滿足多種專科的需求,從而幫助醫院提高手術室的運轉率和手術柔軟性。機器人輔助手術平台的持續普及進一步增加了對能夠在複雜手術過程中穩定維持患者體位的體位擺放系統的需求。
  • 癌症診斷和放射治療精準度需求的不斷成長,正透過擴大腫瘤服務能力進一步加速市場成長。全球癌症負擔持續加重,要求醫療機構擴展其影像能力和放射治療基礎設施。根據國際癌症研究機構(IARC)統計,2022年全球新增癌症病例約2,000萬例,已開發國家及新興醫療體系對體外放射治療的需求持續上升。精確的固定和可重複的患者定位直接影響治療質量,因為即使是輕微的偏差也會影響放射劑量和影像抗蝕劑。這項臨床需求正推動對專用定位配件、固定系統和專為腫瘤應用設計的碳纖維治療床的投資不斷增加。
  • 醫院對混合手術室和先進影像基礎設施的投資是另一個重要的成長要素。醫療機構不斷升級老舊的手術基礎設施,打造集手術、即時影像和數位化工作流程管理於一體的一體化手術環境。這些投資推動了對能夠相容於多種影像模式且不限制臨床操作的定位系統的需求。產品與CT、MRI、透視和機器人輔助手術的兼容性已不再是特殊功能,而是常見的採購要求。能夠提供可互通定位平台及特定手術配件的製造商,在大規模醫院現代化專案中佔據了有利地位。
  • 隨著對病人安全和手術全期品質提升的日益重視,整個醫療保健行業的採購決策正在改變。臨床指引越來越認知到患者體位在手術結果中的關鍵作用。手術全期註冊護理師協會建議採用標準化體位,以減少手術全期護理中的壓瘡、神經壓迫、呼吸系統併發症和跌倒。醫院在評估體位系統時,不僅考慮傳統的耐用性評估,還從壓力分佈、穩定性、調節便利性和醫護人員效率等方面進行考慮。這些臨床重點正在推動過時設備的更新換代,這些設備已無法滿足現代病患安全規範的要求。
  • 隨著外科手術領域專業化程度的提高,對特定手術定位解決方案的需求也日益成長。整形外科、神經外科、介入心臟病學、脊椎外科、減重手術和介入放射學等手術都需要不同的定位設定和輔助系統。醫療機構擴大採用針對特定手術需求的專用定位產品,而不是僅僅依賴通用手術台。 Stryker、Integra LifeSciences、Qfix 和 Xodus Medical 等公司正在透過模組化配件和影像平台擴展產品系列,提供特定手術類型的解決方案,使醫院能夠在適應日益專業化的臨床工作流程的同時,實現跨科設備的標準化。

市場限制因素

  • 資本投資的漫長採購週期限制了替換需求,導致製造商的訂單模式不規則。患者體位擺放系統通常作為資本設備採購,並經常作為手術室或放射科現代化改造計畫的一部分進行實施。公立醫院和大規模醫療網路的採購決策通常需要經過臨床評估、預算批准、技術評估和公開競標,才能最終簽訂合約。即使現有設備已達到建議的使用壽命,這種多階段流程也可能導致採購決策的延遲。製造商面臨不規則的訂單模式,尤其是在公共醫療系統中,採購優先順序由年度資本預算決定。
  • 高度客製化的需求會增加定位系統供應商的生產複雜性和庫存成本。定位系統必須能夠適應各種外科手術、影像技術和病患特徵。醫院經常需要手術專用配件、客製化安裝介面、肥胖患者的支撐系統,以及與現有手術台和影像平台的兼容性。雖然模組化產品架構提供了更高的柔軟性,但客製化會增加生產複雜性、庫存管理和售後服務方面的要求。規模小規模的供應商在控制生產成本和交貨時間的同時,往往面臨維護種類繁多的配件的更大挑戰。
  • 監管合規和產品認證會延長產品上市時間並增加研發成本。病患體位擺放系統屬於醫療設備,必須滿足嚴格的安全、品質和性能要求才能商業化。在多個司法管轄區銷售產品的製造商必須遵守美國食品藥物管理局(FDA)、歐盟醫療設備法規 (MDR) 以及其他國家監管機構所頒布的法規。合規要求包括產品測試、文件記錄、品管系統、適用的臨床評估以及上市後監測。這些要求會增加研發成本,並可能延遲產品上市,尤其對於推出電動體位擺放系統或用於高風險手術應用產品的公司而言更是如此。
  • 醫院資本預算的壓力正在影響採購優先事項,並促使醫療機構延長設備的使用壽命。除了常規的基礎設施升級外,醫療機構還在持續投資於機器人手術、先進的影像設備、數位醫療平台和網路安全。由於患者體位擺放系統很少直接產生收入,採購團隊通常會根據生命週期成本、預期使用率、維護需求以及與現有設備的兼容性來評估採購。由於資金限制,醫院可能會選擇透過維修和更換配件來延長現有體位擺放系統的運作,而不是進行全面的系統升級。這種採購行為在資源有限的醫療系統和小規模私立醫院中尤為突出。
  • 對專用材料和電子機械組件供應鏈的依賴給製造商帶來了營運風險。現代定位系統擴大採用碳纖維複合材料檯面、精密執行器、電子控制系統、特殊聚合物和高性能軸承。鑑於全球製造網路供應鏈中斷的情況,醫療設備製造商在近期的年度報告和投資者溝通中繼續將供應鏈韌性列為優先事項。專用組件交貨週期延長會導致生產計劃延誤和庫存成本增加,而原料價格波動則進一步擠壓產品利潤率。

目錄

第1章:執行摘要

第2章:市場概述

  • 市場概覽
  • 市場的定義
  • 調查範圍
  • 市場區隔

第3章:商業趨勢

  • 市場促進因素
  • 市場限制因素
  • 市場機遇
  • 波特五力分析
  • 產業價值鏈分析
  • 政策與法規
  • 策略建議

第4章 技術展望

第5章 病人定位系統市場:依產品分類

  • 桌子
  • 配件
  • 其他

第6章 病人定位系統市場:依應用領域分類

  • 外科手術
  • 疾病診斷
  • 癌症治療

第7章 病人定位系統市場:依最終使用者分類

  • 醫院和診所
  • 門診手術中心(ASC)
  • 診斷檢查室
  • 其他

第8章 病人定位系統市場:按地區分類

  • 北美洲
    • 依產品
    • 透過使用
    • 最終用戶
    • 國家
      • 美國
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
  • 南美洲
    • 依產品
    • 透過使用
    • 最終用戶
    • 國家
      • 巴西
      • 阿根廷
      • 其他
  • 歐洲
    • 依產品
    • 透過使用
    • 最終用戶
    • 國家
      • 英國
      • 德國
      • 法國
      • 西班牙
      • 其他
  • 中東和非洲
    • 依產品
    • 透過使用
    • 最終用戶
    • 國家
      • 沙烏地阿拉伯
      • UAE
      • 其他
  • 亞太地區
    • 依產品
    • 透過使用
    • 最終用戶
    • 國家
      • 中國
      • 日本
      • 印度
      • 韓國
      • 台灣
      • 其他

第9章:競爭環境與分析

  • 主要公司及策略分析
  • 市佔率分析
  • 合併、收購、協議和合作關係
  • 競爭環境儀錶板

第10章:公司簡介

  • Stryker
  • Integra LifeSciences
  • Globus Medical
  • Qfix
  • Xodus Medical
  • Ergotrics
  • Cemar Electro

第11章附錄

簡介目錄
Product Code: KSI061616034

The Patient Positioning Systems Market, sustaining a 4.04% CAGR, is projected to expand from USD 1.659 billion in 2025 to USD 2.105 billion in 2031.

The patient positioning systems market is undergoing significant transformation driven by the expansion of minimally invasive and image-guided surgical procedures, rising global cancer prevalence, and increasing hospital investment in hybrid operating rooms and advanced diagnostic imaging infrastructure. The market's evolution is characterized by the growing recognition that precise, stable, and procedure-specific patient positioning is essential for improving procedural accuracy, patient safety, and workflow efficiency across surgery, diagnostic imaging, and radiation therapy. The convergence of clinical evidence, technological innovation, and healthcare infrastructure modernization is enabling broader adoption of modular positioning platforms and specialized accessories across hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and diagnostic laboratories. Surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists increasingly evaluate positioning systems based on imaging compatibility, infection control, modularity, ergonomic adjustment, and integration with surgical and imaging workflows rather than mechanical performance alone. The Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) continues to emphasize standardized positioning protocols and pressure redistribution to reduce pressure injuries and positioning-related complications, strengthening the clinical safety rationale for equipment investment. The market is witnessing significant investment in carbon-fiber tabletops, motorized positioning mechanisms, lightweight modular accessories, and antimicrobial surfaces, positioning patient positioning systems as a critical component within broader operating room and diagnostic imaging modernization strategies.

Market Drivers

  • The expansion of minimally invasive and image-guided surgical procedures represents the primary driver for the patient positioning systems market. Operating room practice increasingly favors minimally invasive surgery because it reduces recovery time, lowers complication rates, and shortens hospital stays. These procedures require precise and repeatable patient positioning to maintain surgical access while ensuring compatibility with fluoroscopy, endoscopy, and robotic imaging systems. Manufacturers have responded by introducing modular operating tables and positioning accessories that support multiple specialties without requiring extensive equipment changeovers, allowing hospitals to improve operating room utilization and procedural flexibility. The continued adoption of robotic-assisted surgical platforms further increases demand for positioning systems capable of maintaining stable patient orientation throughout complex interventions.
  • Rising demand for precision in cancer diagnosis and radiation therapy is further accelerating market growth through expanded oncology service capacity. The global cancer burden continues to increase, requiring healthcare providers to expand diagnostic imaging capacity and radiation treatment infrastructure. The International Agency for Research on Cancer reported approximately 20 million new cancer cases worldwide during 2022, while demand for external beam radiotherapy continues to rise across both developed and emerging healthcare systems. Accurate immobilization and reproducible patient positioning directly influence treatment quality because even small positioning variations can affect radiation delivery and image registration. This clinical requirement has increased investment in dedicated positioning accessories, immobilization systems, and carbon-fiber treatment couches designed specifically for oncology applications.
  • Hospital investment in hybrid operating rooms and advanced imaging infrastructure constitutes another significant growth driver. Healthcare providers continue replacing ageing surgical infrastructure with integrated operating environments that combine surgery, real-time imaging, and digital workflow management. These investments increase demand for positioning systems capable of supporting multiple imaging modalities while maintaining unrestricted clinical access. Product compatibility with CT, MRI, fluoroscopy, and robotic-assisted surgery has become a common procurement requirement rather than a premium feature. Manufacturers that offer interoperable positioning platforms with procedure-specific accessories are better positioned to participate in large hospital modernization projects.
  • Growing emphasis on patient safety and perioperative quality improvement is reshaping purchasing decisions throughout the healthcare sector. Clinical guidelines increasingly recognize patient positioning as an important contributor to surgical outcomes. The Association of periOperative Registered Nurses recommends standardized positioning practices to reduce pressure injuries, nerve compression, respiratory complications, and falls during perioperative care. Hospitals increasingly evaluate positioning systems based on pressure redistribution, stability, ease of adjustment, and staff ergonomics alongside traditional durability measures. These clinical priorities encourage the replacement of older equipment that no longer supports contemporary patient safety protocols.
  • Increasing specialization across surgical disciplines is driving demand for procedure-specific positioning solutions. Orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, cardiovascular interventions, spine procedures, bariatric surgery, and interventional radiology each require different positioning configurations and accessory systems. Rather than relying on universal operating tables alone, healthcare providers increasingly procure specialty positioning products tailored to specific procedural requirements. Companies such as Stryker, Integra LifeSciences, Qfix, and Xodus Medical have expanded procedure-specific product portfolios that combine modular accessories with imaging-compatible platforms, allowing hospitals to standardize equipment across departments while accommodating increasingly specialized clinical workflows.

Market Restraints

  • Lengthy capital procurement cycles limit replacement demand and create irregular order patterns for manufacturers. Patient positioning systems are typically purchased as capital equipment and are often bundled with broader operating room or imaging suite modernization projects. Procurement decisions within public hospitals and large healthcare networks generally require clinical evaluation, budget approval, technical assessment, and competitive tendering before contracts are awarded. These multi-stage processes can delay purchasing decisions even when existing equipment has reached the end of its recommended service life. Manufacturers face irregular order patterns, particularly in publicly funded healthcare systems where annual capital budgets determine purchasing priorities.
  • High customization requirements increase manufacturing complexity and inventory costs for positioning system suppliers. Positioning systems must accommodate a broad range of surgical disciplines, imaging modalities, and patient characteristics. Hospitals frequently request procedure-specific accessories, customized attachment interfaces, bariatric support systems, and compatibility with existing operating tables or imaging platforms. While modular product architectures have improved flexibility, customization increases manufacturing complexity, inventory management, and after-sales service requirements. Smaller suppliers often face greater challenges in maintaining extensive accessory portfolios while controlling production costs and delivery lead times.
  • Regulatory compliance and product certification extend commercialization timelines and increase development costs. Patient positioning systems are classified as medical devices and must comply with stringent safety, quality, and performance requirements before commercialization. Manufacturers marketing products in multiple jurisdictions must satisfy regulations issued by authorities such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Commission under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), and other national regulators. Compliance involves product testing, documentation, quality management systems, clinical evaluation where applicable, and post-market surveillance. These requirements increase development costs and can delay market entry, particularly for companies introducing electrically powered positioning systems or products intended for high-risk surgical applications.
  • Pressure on hospital capital budgets influences purchasing priorities and encourages equipment life extension. Healthcare providers continue to invest in robotic surgery, advanced imaging equipment, digital health platforms, and cybersecurity alongside routine infrastructure replacement. Because patient positioning systems rarely generate direct revenue, procurement teams often evaluate purchases according to lifecycle cost, expected utilization, maintenance requirements, and compatibility with existing equipment. Capital constraints may encourage hospitals to extend the operating life of installed positioning systems through refurbishment or accessory replacement instead of complete system upgrades. This purchasing behavior is particularly evident in resource-constrained healthcare systems and smaller private hospitals.
  • Supply chain dependence for specialized materials and electromechanical components creates operational risks for manufacturers. Modern positioning systems increasingly incorporate carbon-fiber composite tabletops, precision actuators, electronic control systems, specialized polymers, and high-performance bearings. Medical device manufacturers have continued to identify supply chain resilience as an operational priority in recent annual reports and investor communications following disruptions experienced across global manufacturing networks. Extended lead times for specialized components can delay production schedules and increase inventory costs, while fluctuations in raw material prices place additional pressure on product margins.

Technology and Product Insights

  • The technology landscape is characterized by the growing importance of modular product platforms, imaging compatibility, and ergonomic design. The Tables segment represents the most commercially important product category because it provides the foundational support structure for all surgical and diagnostic positioning applications. Hospitals increasingly prefer systems that can accommodate multiple specialties while minimizing equipment changeover between procedures, improving utilization of high-value operating rooms. Carbon-fiber tabletops have become particularly valuable because they permit high-quality intraoperative imaging while reducing image interference during fluoroscopic and hybrid surgical procedures. Procurement decisions within this segment extend beyond mechanical performance to include radiolucency, weight capacity, pressure redistribution, ease of patient transfer, compatibility with robotic surgical platforms, infection prevention features, and ergonomic adjustment mechanisms.
  • The Accessories segment is expanding as healthcare providers seek to enhance the functionality and specialization of their positioning systems. Procedure-specific accessories, including headrests, arm boards, leg holders, chest rolls, and immobilization devices, allow hospitals to adapt positioning platforms to diverse surgical and diagnostic applications without purchasing additional tables. Demand for accessories is particularly strong in neurosurgery, spine surgery, radiation oncology, and orthopedic procedures where precise, reproducible positioning directly influences clinical outcomes. Manufacturers continue expanding modular accessory portfolios because hospitals increasingly seek standardized positioning platforms capable of supporting diverse specialties while reducing equipment duplication across departments.
  • The Surgery Application segment represents the most commercially important application category because virtually every surgical specialty depends on accurate, stable, and procedure-specific patient positioning. General surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, cardiovascular procedures, urology, gynecology, and minimally invasive interventions each require different positioning configurations, creating sustained demand for modular operating tables and specialized accessories. Competition within this segment centers on clinical versatility and procedural specialization rather than price alone. Companies such as Stryker, Integra LifeSciences, Xodus Medical, and Globus Medical offer procedure-specific positioning accessories designed for spine surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic procedures, and other complex interventions where reproducibility and clinician access directly influence procedural efficiency.
  • The Cancer Therapy Application segment is expanding as the global cancer burden increases demand for radiation therapy and precision oncology services. Accurate immobilization and reproducible patient positioning directly influence treatment quality, with even small positioning variations affecting radiation delivery and image registration. Qfix occupies a distinct position through its concentration on radiation oncology and diagnostic imaging, with product development emphasizing immobilization precision, patient comfort during repeated treatment sessions, compatibility with imaging systems, and compliance with evolving radiotherapy workflows.
  • The integration of digital technologies and workflow optimization is becoming increasingly important as healthcare providers seek to improve operating room efficiency. Although patient positioning systems remain primarily mechanical devices, hospitals increasingly expect compatibility with digitally connected operating rooms, surgical navigation systems, and integrated workflow platforms. Product development is therefore emphasizing electronic positioning controls, system interoperability, equipment status monitoring, and compatibility with broader operating room information systems, while ensuring compliance with medical device cybersecurity and safety requirements.

Competitive and Strategic Outlook

  • The competitive landscape is characterized by a moderately fragmented structure in which multinational medical technology companies compete alongside specialized positioning system manufacturers focusing on specific clinical disciplines. Stryker, Integra LifeSciences, Globus Medical, Qfix, and Xodus Medical compete through product performance, regulatory compliance, clinical versatility, service capability, and compatibility with existing operating room and imaging infrastructure. Large diversified suppliers benefit from established relationships with hospital procurement teams, broad distribution networks, comprehensive service organizations, and complementary surgical equipment portfolios. Specialized manufacturers compete through application expertise, customized positioning solutions, and close collaboration with clinicians involved in neurosurgery, spine surgery, radiation oncology, and image-guided interventions.
  • Competition increasingly extends beyond hardware performance. Hospitals evaluate suppliers according to installation support, preventive maintenance, training services, replacement part availability, regulatory documentation, and the ability to integrate new positioning systems with existing operating room infrastructure. These service capabilities have become increasingly important as healthcare providers seek to maximize equipment utilization while minimizing operating room downtime. Long equipment replacement cycles and extensive product validation requirements continue to moderate competitive turnover, with hospitals generally favoring suppliers with established regulatory records, proven clinical performance, and dependable after-sales support.
  • Recent key developments highlight the industry's focus on specialized product portfolios, strategic acquisitions, and market expansion. Drive Medical acquired Compass Health Brands to strengthen its broad portfolio of consumer and patient support aids. CQ Medical acquired Bionix's Radiation Therapy business, expanding its global footprint in specialized radiotherapy patient positioning and marking product portfolios. Xodus Medical introduced the Freeman Arm Positioner, designed to improve upper-extremity positioning, patient stability, and operating-room workflow across diverse surgical procedures. HKW partnered with the Cherubini family to recapitalize AliMed Inc., actively supporting the manufacturer's continued market expansion initiatives and strategic positioning solution developments.
  • Barriers to entry remain moderate because commercial success requires access to precision manufacturing, quality assurance systems, regulatory knowledge, and established hospital relationships. Companies continue strengthening modular product platforms, expanding accessory portfolios, and strengthening regional distribution networks to differentiate their market positions. Healthcare providers increasingly evaluate equipment according to total ownership cost over many years of operation, favoring systems that accept interchangeable accessories, require less maintenance, integrate with multiple imaging modalities, and accommodate changing procedural requirements.

Short Conclusion

  • The patient positioning systems market is positioned for steady growth driven by the convergence of minimally invasive surgery adoption, cancer care expansion, and hospital infrastructure modernization. The transition from standalone positioning equipment toward integrated, modular platforms supporting multiple clinical applications represents a fundamental shift in purchasing behavior. While challenges related to capital procurement cycles, customization complexity, and regulatory compliance persist, strategic investments in imaging compatibility, modular product design, and comprehensive lifecycle support are creating durable competitive advantages for established suppliers. The long-term market outlook remains positive, with patient positioning systems evolving as a critical component within surgical, diagnostic, and oncology care pathways, supporting procedural accuracy, patient safety, and clinical efficiency across global healthcare systems.

Key Benefits of this Report

  • Insightful Analysis: Detailed market insights across regions, customer segments, policies, socio-economic factors, consumer preferences, and industry verticals.
  • Competitive Landscape: Understand strategic moves by key players to identify optimal market entry approaches.
  • Market Drivers and Future Trends: Assess major growth forces and emerging developments shaping the market.
  • Actionable Recommendations: Support strategic decisions to unlock new revenue streams.
  • Caters to a Wide Audience: Suitable for startups, research institutions, consultants, SMEs, and large enterprises.

What Businesses Use Our Reports For

  • Industry and market insights, opportunity assessment, product demand forecasting, market entry strategy, geographical expansion, capital investment decisions, regulatory analysis, new product development, and competitive intelligence.

Report Coverage

  • Historical data from 2021 to 2024, Base year 2025, and Forecast years from 2026 to 2031
  • Growth opportunities, challenges, supply chain outlook, regulatory framework, and trend analysis
  • Competitive positioning, strategies, and market share evaluation, and trade analysis
  • Revenue growth and forecast assessment across segments and regions
  • Company profiling including strategies, products, financials, and key developments

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. MARKET SNAPSHOT

  • 2.1. Market Overview
  • 2.2. Market Definition
  • 2.3. Scope of the Study
  • 2.4. Market Segmentation

3. BUSINESS LANDSCAPE

  • 3.1. Market Drivers
  • 3.2. Market Restraints
  • 3.3. Market Opportunities
  • 3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 3.5. Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 3.6. Policies and Regulations
  • 3.7. Strategic Recommendations

4. TECHNOLOGICAL OUTLOOK

5. PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEMS MARKET BY PRODUCT

  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Tables
  • 5.3. Accessories
  • 5.4. Others

6. PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEMS MARKET BY APPLICATION

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Surgery
  • 6.3. Disease Diagnosis
  • 6.4. Cancer Therapy

7. PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEMS MARKET BY END-USER

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Hospitals and Clinics
  • 7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
  • 7.4. Diagnostic Laboratories
  • 7.5. Others

8. PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEMS MARKET BY GEOGRAPHY

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. North America
    • 8.2.1. By Product
    • 8.2.2. By Application
    • 8.2.3. By End-User
    • 8.2.4. By Country
      • 8.2.4.1. USA
      • 8.2.4.2. Canada
      • 8.2.4.3. Mexico
  • 8.3. South America
    • 8.3.1. By Product
    • 8.3.2. By Application
    • 8.3.3. By End-User
    • 8.3.4. By Country
      • 8.3.4.1. Brazil
      • 8.3.4.2. Argentina
      • 8.3.4.3. Others
  • 8.4. Europe
    • 8.4.1. By Product
    • 8.4.2. By Application
    • 8.4.3. By End-User
    • 8.4.4. By Country
      • 8.4.4.1. United Kingdom
      • 8.4.4.2. Germany
      • 8.4.4.3. France
      • 8.4.4.4. Spain
      • 8.4.4.5. Others
  • 8.5. Middle East and Africa
    • 8.5.1. By Product
    • 8.5.2. By Application
    • 8.5.3. By End-User
    • 8.5.4. By Country
      • 8.5.4.1. Saudi Arabia
      • 8.5.4.2. UAE
      • 8.5.4.3. Others
  • 8.6. Asia Pacific
    • 8.6.1. By Product
    • 8.6.2. By Application
    • 8.6.3. By End-User
    • 8.6.4. By Country
      • 8.6.4.1. China
      • 8.6.4.2. Japan
      • 8.6.4.3. India
      • 8.6.4.4. South Korea
      • 8.6.4.5. Taiwan
      • 8.6.4.6. Others

9. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS

  • 9.1. Major Players and Strategy Analysis
  • 9.2. Market Share Analysis
  • 9.3. Mergers, Acquisitions, Agreements, and Collaborations
  • 9.4. Competitive Dashboard

10. COMPANY PROFILES

  • 10.1. Stryker
  • 10.2. Integra LifeSciences
  • 10.3. Globus Medical
  • 10.4. Qfix
  • 10.5. Xodus Medical
  • 10.6. Ergotrics
  • 10.7. Cemar Electro

11. APPENDIX

  • 11.1. Currency
  • 11.2. Assumptions
  • 11.3. Base and Forecast Years Timeline
  • 11.4. Key benefits for the stakeholders
  • 11.5. Research Methodology
  • 11.6. Abbreviations