查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1962839

海軍近程武器防禦系統市場：依武器類型、平台類型、安裝類型、應用、最終用戶分類，全球預測（2026-2032年）

Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market by Weapon Type, Platform Type, Mount Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 184 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，海軍近程武器系統市場價值將達到 38.4 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 42.8 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 84.5 億美元，複合年成長率為 11.91%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025 38.4億美元
預計年份：2026年 42.8億美元
預測年份：2032年 84.5億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 11.91%

從作戰角度出發的介紹：解釋為什麼先進的近程武器系統對於多層海上防禦和平台生存能力至關重要。

海軍作戰人員面臨日益嚴峻的威脅情勢，速度、精準度和一體化對於海上生存至關重要。敵方能力已從單一領域作戰演變為多層次、同步的威脅，包括小型無人駕駛航空器系統群、掠海反艦飛彈和先進導引武器。隨著艦艇在遠離港口的水域和競爭激烈的沿海地區作戰，對能夠在數秒內探測、識別和摧毀各種威脅的強大近程防禦解決方案的需求已成為一項不容妥協的要求。本文整合了推動艦載近程防禦系統重新投資的作戰因素，並提出了近程防禦架構現代化的整體戰略依據。

定向能、感測器融合和分散式作戰等領域的技術創新如何從根本上改變海上近程防禦戰略。

由於技術、作戰和地緣政治的同步發展，近海防禦格局已發生根本性變化，威脅評估和採購重點也隨之重塑。首先，定向能量武器已從概念階段邁向作戰原型階段，並在對抗小型無人駕駛航空器系統（UAS）方面取得了顯著成效。這促使人們重新評估高功率攔截飛彈和模組化安裝技術的改進也為這些進步提供了補充，從而產生了適用於不同平台的靈活解決方案。

本分析探討了美國在 2025 年實施的關稅措施如何改變了海軍近程防禦武器系統 (CIWS) 的採購風險管理、供應鏈韌性和子系統籌資策略。

美國2025年實施的關稅和貿易措施為國防採購計畫引入了新的變數，尤其是在供應鏈跨越國界且依賴專用零件的領域。某些感測器、電力電子產品和精密製造材料的進口成本上升增加了採購風險，促使專案經理重新評估其籌資策略。為此，一些關鍵供應商加快了關鍵子系統的在地化進程，擴大了國內供應商發展計劃，並加大了對國內雙源解決方案的投資，以降低單一來源風險。這些調整與旨在加強國防工業基礎的持續措施同步進行，凸顯了國家供應鏈的韌性以及國內製造能力的戰略價值。

清晰的洞察力，使武器類別、平台限制和作戰最終用戶優先事項保持一致，從而能夠做出以目標為導向的近程防禦武器採購決策。

透過細分分析，我們可以明確整個生態系統中能力優先順序和投資意圖的集中方向，從而提供可操作的洞察。基於武器類型，火砲型、雷射型和飛彈型近程防禦武器系統（CIWS）的考量因素有顯著差異。火砲型CIWS的性能和物流需求因口徑而異，包括30-60毫米系統、30毫米以下的選項以及60毫米以上的安裝方式。另一方面，雷射型CIWS項目則以功率等級分類，包括100-150千瓦系統、100千瓦以下的解決方案以及150千瓦以上的系統。這些差異會影響平台電源、溫度控管和作戰理論。因此，採購團隊必須使武器選擇與艦載電源架構和任務概況相符。根據平台類型，航空母艦、兩棲攻擊艦、輕型護衛艦、驅逐艦和護衛艦獨特的作戰節奏和生存能力要求決定了不同的整合管道和全壽命週期支援模式。換句話說，即使採用相同的近程防禦武器系統解決方案，也可能需要不同的配置來適應位移、任務持續時間和人員部署等限制。

美洲、歐洲、中東、非洲和亞太地區的作戰差異和工業能力影響近程防禦武器系統（CIWS）的採用、維護和互通性。

區域分析揭示了影響近程防禦系統採用模式的不同作戰壓力因素、工業能力和採購行為。在美洲，海軍現代化計畫強調與盟友的互通性、注重維護管道，並日益關注定向能試驗以及傳統的動能解決方案，從而推動了優先考慮模組化和與國內供應商合作的籌資策略。在歐洲、中東和非洲，威脅的多樣性和沿海地區的複雜性推動了對多功能、可快速部署且能適應區域交戰規則和聯合行動的近程防禦武器系統（CIWS）的需求。同時，國防工業合作框架持續影響出口管制和綜合進度安排。在亞太地區，高頻作戰和爭議水域的存在催生了對高吞吐量交戰系統、先進感測器融合和分散式交戰能力的強勁需求。這加速了對支援高耗能定向能系統的艦載電力和冷卻基礎設施的投資和實地測試。

綜合性公司、專業子系統創新公司和新技術參與企業如何重塑近程防禦武器系統供應商的趨勢和長期維護預期？

主要整合商、子系統專家和新興技術供應商之間的競爭表明，實現作戰能力的途徑多種多樣。一些成熟的國防主承包商正專注於全解決方案整合，提供增強型動能攔截系統、火控系統和整合服務，以降低大型平台專案整合的風險。同時，專注於定向能組件、高頻寬電感測器和先進電源管理系統的專業供應商正透過推動模組化方法和第三方升級，重塑供應商生態系統。擁有雷射和自主技術商業性背景的新興參與企業正透過引入低成本原型和迭代測試模型來加速創新週期，從而挑戰傳統的國防採購節奏。

為經營團隊提供切實可行的建議，以加快整合速度，確保供應鏈的韌性，並將以維護為中心的採購實踐制度化，用於CIWS。

產業領導者應推動協調行動，將能力建構與具有韌性的產業實踐和運作適應性結合。首先，應優先考慮模組化架構和開放介面，使平台能夠以最小的結構改動整合動能武器、定向能量武器和飛彈基礎層。這將使艦隊能夠柔軟性進行分階段升級，並隨著技術的成熟更換子系統。其次，應投資扶持國內供應商，並對關鍵零件實施雙重採購，建立供應商認證流程，以降低單點故障風險，並能快速應對地緣政治動盪。第三，應擴大演示驗證和實彈測試項目，以檢驗系統在典型運行環境下的性能，並加快經驗教訓的總結週期。這些項目應包含盟軍互通性測試，以確保多國協同作戰能力。

嚴謹透明的調查方法，結合開放原始碼技術檢驗、專家訪談、以及情境驅動的供應鏈和能力分析。

本研究整合了公開的技術文獻、國防採購政策文件、演示驗證專案報告和專家訪談，建構了一個嚴謹且權威的分析基礎。技術評估基於公開演示測試中檢驗的性能參數、定向能和感測器融合領域的同行評審研究以及製造商的技術簡報，並參考了運行後總結和監管指南。供應鏈和行業分析涵蓋了貿易政策文件、供應商公告以及籌資策略的可觀察調整，尤其關注關稅變化後供應商的本地化和資格認證工作。針對平台整合工程師、專案經理和作戰指揮官的專家訪談在匿名條件下進行，旨在獲取他們對專案權衡和能力優先事項的坦誠意見。

簡潔的結論強調了整合技術、維護和籌資策略對於實現永續的近程防禦武器系統能力優勢的重要性。

在日益複雜的威脅、快速成熟的技術以及不斷成長的地緣政治壓力下，近程防禦已成為世界各國海軍和海上安全部隊的戰略重點。現代近程防禦武器系統（CIWS）解決方案必須整合到跨平台和跨領域的多層防禦架構中，並在殺傷力、反應速度和持久性之間取得平衡。最穩健的籌資策略強調模組化、國內供應商的韌性以及以演示主導的風險緩解措施，從而加快從概念到作戰能力的轉化速度。透過將技術選擇與後勤、訓練和採購結構結合，國防領導者可以提供有效的點防禦解決方案，在不影響艦隊戰備或長期經濟效益的前提下，增強平台的生存能力。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章：調查方法

  • 調查設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查的前提
  • 研究限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席體驗長觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 工業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 市場進入策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會映射
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依武器類型分類

  • 基於火砲的近程防禦武器系統
    • 30～60mm
    • 30毫米或更小
    • 超過 60 毫米
  • 基於雷射的近程防禦武器系統
    • 100-150千瓦
    • 小於100千瓦
    • 超過150千瓦
  • 飛彈基近程防禦武器系統

第9章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依平台類型分類

  • 航空母艦
  • 兩棲攻擊艦
  • 克爾維特
  • 驅逐艦
  • 護衛艦

第10章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依安裝類型分類

  • 固定砲塔
  • 模組化的
  • 遙控
  • 旋轉式安裝類型

第11章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依應用領域分類

  • 防空
  • 反無人機
  • 反導
  • 反艦飛彈

第12章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依最終用戶分類

  • 日本海上保全廳
  • 陸戰隊
  • 海軍

第13章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依地區分類

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依類別分類

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章：海軍近程武器系統市場：依國家分類

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章：美國海軍艦艇近程武器系統市場

第17章：中國海軍艦艇近程武器系統市場

第18章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Aselsan AS
  • BAE Systems plc
  • Bharat Dynamics Limited
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Hanwha Corporation
  • Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Leonardo SpA
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • MBDA Inc.
  • Navantia, SA
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • RTX Corporation
  • Saab AB
  • Thales Group
  • The Boeing Company
Product Code: MRR-0A38069519DE

The Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market was valued at USD 3.84 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.28 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 11.91%, reaching USD 8.45 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 3.84 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 4.28 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.45 billion
CAGR (%) 11.91%

An operationally focused introduction framing why advanced close-in weapon systems are now critical to layered maritime defense and platform survivability

Naval operators face an accelerating threat environment where speed, precision, and integration determine survivability at sea. Adversary capabilities have evolved beyond single-domain engagements to layered, simultaneous threats that include swarms of small unmanned aerial systems, sea-skimming anti-ship missiles, and advanced guided munitions. As platforms extend their missions farther from port and operate in contested littorals, the requirement for robust close-in defense solutions that can detect, discriminate, and neutralize diverse threats within seconds has become non-negotiable. This introduction synthesizes the operational drivers prompting renewed investment in shipboard point-defense systems and frames the broader strategic rationale for modernizing close-in defense architectures.

Decision-makers must balance trade-offs among lethality, rules-of-engagement compliance, logistics, and lifecycle sustainment when selecting or upgrading CIWS capabilities. Advances in directed energy, sensor fusion, and autonomous engagement loops have introduced new options, but they also increase integration complexity and demand changes to training, maintenance, and doctrine. Consequently, leaders are increasingly focused on interoperable solutions that align with distributed maritime operations, ensuring that close-in defenses act as an integrated layer within a ship's broader defensive posture rather than as isolated point solutions. This introduction sets expectations for the subsequent analysis by highlighting the operational imperatives, technological levers, and procurement considerations that shape CIWS decisions today.

How breakthroughs in directed energy, sensor fusion, and distributed engagement are catalyzing a fundamental transformation in maritime close-in defense strategies

The landscape for maritime close-in defense has shifted decisively as a result of concurrent technological, operational, and geopolitical trends reshaping threat calculus and acquisition priorities. First, directed-energy weapons have moved from concept to fieldable prototypes with demonstrated track records in countering small unmanned aerial systems, prompting a reassessment of rules of engagement and logistics models for power-dense systems. Second, sensor and data-fusion advances have compressed sensor-to-shooter timelines, enabling multi-sensor cueing and automated engagement chains that reduce human reaction time and increase engagement throughput. These developments are complemented by improvements in guided-kinetic interceptors and modular mount technologies that allow more flexible fit-for-platform solutions.

Operationally, navies are integrating CIWS into distributed networks that prioritize resilience and redundancy. The emergence of collaborative engagement capabilities means CIWS no longer operates in isolation; instead, it participates in a layered defensive architecture that includes longer-range air defenses and off-board sensors. This transition also changes how navies train and certify crews, as operators must now manage both traditional fire-control tasks and oversight of autonomous engagement modes. Geopolitical dynamics, including contested access operations and the proliferation of low-cost precision effects, reinforce the need for rapid fielding pathways and interoperable standards. In short, transformative shifts are stacking technological opportunity on top of operational necessity, accelerating adoption cycles and creating new expectations for lifecycle support and integration.

Analyzing how recent United States tariff measures introduced in 2025 have reshaped procurement risk management, supply chain resilience, and subsystem sourcing strategies for naval CIWS

Tariff policies and trade measures enacted by the United States in 2025 introduced an additional variable into defense procurement planning, particularly where supply chains cross international borders and rely on specialized components. Higher import costs for certain sensors, power electronics, and precision manufacturing inputs have increased procurement risk and prompted program managers to re-evaluate sourcing strategies. In response, some prime contractors accelerated localization of critical subsystems, expanded domestic supplier development programs, and increased investment in dual-source domestic variants to mitigate single-source exposure. These adjustments, occurring alongside ongoing defense industrial base initiatives, have emphasized the resilience of national supply chains and the strategic value of onshore manufacturing capabilities.

Consequently, procurement timelines and contract structures have adapted to prioritize supplier qualification and lifecycle availability over single-vendor cost optimization. Programs that previously relied on integrated foreign subsystems shifted toward architectures that accommodate plug-and-play domestic alternatives, enabling fiscal and operational flexibility while preserving interoperability. The tariff environment also catalyzed closer collaboration between program offices and industrial partners to scope alternative materials and manufacture techniques that maintain performance thresholds without introducing new programmatic risk. Ultimately, the tariff-driven recalibration has reinforced the broader trend toward supply chain resilience and has elevated procurement practices that balance technical ambition with industrial sustainability.

Clear segmentation-driven insights that align weapon classes, platform constraints, and operational end-user priorities to enable fit-for-purpose CIWS procurement decisions

Segmentation analysis yields actionable insights by clarifying where capability priorities and investment appetite concentrate across the ecosystem. Based on Weapon Type, considerations differ markedly among Gun Based CIWS, Laser Based CIWS, and Missile Based CIWS; within Gun Based CIWS the performance and logistics footprint vary across calibers including 30-60 millimeter systems, sub-30 millimeter options, and larger-than-60 millimeter installations, while Laser Based CIWS programs differentiate by power class such as 100-150 kilowatt systems, sub-100 kilowatt solutions, and systems exceeding 150 kilowatts. These distinctions influence platform electrical provisioning, thermal management, and engagement doctrine, so procurement teams must align weapon selection with shipboard power architecture and mission profile. Based on Platform Type, the unique operational tempos and survivability requirements of aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, corvettes, destroyers, and frigates drive divergent integration pathways and lifecycle support models, meaning the same CIWS solution may need variant configurations to fit displacement, mission endurance, and crew complement constraints.

Based on End User, the priorities of coast guard units, marine corps formations, and navy fleets create different acceptance criteria; coast guard units often emphasize proportional response and low-collateral engagement profiles, marine corps units prioritize expeditionary logistics and modularity for littoral operations, and navies require sustained high-tempo readiness and interoperability with fleet air-defense schemes. Based on Application, capability emphasis shifts across anti-aircraft, anti-drone, anti-missile, and anti-ship missile missions, which in turn drives investment in sensor fusion, engagement libraries, and interceptor mixes tailored to target speed, radar cross-section, and attack profile. Finally, based on Mount Type, options such as fixed turret, modular, remote operated, and rotary mount influence installation timelines, maintenance access, and upgrade pathways, with modular and remote operated mounts offering accelerated upgrade cycles while fixed turrets can deliver optimized performance at the expense of flexibility. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables program managers to define clear trade spaces and match solutions to operational and industrial constraints.

Regional operational differences and industrial capabilities shaping adoption, sustainment, and interoperability of CIWS across Americas, EMEA, and the Asia-Pacific theaters

Regional intelligence reveals distinct operational stressors, industrial capacities, and acquisition behaviors that influence the adoption patterns for close-in defense systems. In the Americas, naval modernization programs emphasize interoperability with allied architectures, emphasis on sustainment pathways, and growing interest in directed-energy experimentation alongside conventional kinetic solutions, driving procurement strategies that favor modularity and domestic supplier partnerships. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, threat diversity and littoral complexity foster demand for versatile, rapidly deployable CIWS options that can be tailored to regional rules of engagement and coalition operations, while defense industrial cooperation frameworks continue to shape export controls and integration timelines. In the Asia-Pacific, high-tempo operations and contested maritime domains create acute demand signals for high-throughput engagement systems, advanced sensor fusion, and distributed engagement capabilities, prompting accelerated field trials and investments in on-board power and cooling infrastructure to support power-intensive directed-energy systems.

These regional distinctions also influence lifecycle sustainment preferences and training models. For example, operators in certain theaters prioritize low-footprint systems that minimize platform disruptions and enable forward maintenance, whereas others accept more complex installations accompanied by enhanced dockside support and extended training packages. Additionally, interoperability considerations with regional allies and coalition partners shape communications standards, engagement deconfliction protocols, and cooperative sensor sharing arrangements. Recognizing these geographic differentials helps leaders tailor acquisition and industrial strategies to regional operational realities while optimizing cross-theater logistics and coalition integration.

How integrators, specialized subsystem innovators, and emerging technology entrants are reshaping supplier dynamics and long-term sustainment expectations for CIWS

Competitive dynamics among prime integrators, subsystem specialists, and emerging technology providers reveal multiple paths to fieldable capability. Some established defense primes concentrate on full-solution integration, offering hardened kinetic interceptors, fire-control systems, and integration services that reduce program integration risk for large platforms. Simultaneously, specialized suppliers focused on directed-energy components, high-bandwidth electro-optical sensors, and advanced power management systems are altering the supplier ecosystem by enabling modular approaches and third-party upgrades. New entrants with commercial backgrounds in laser technologies or autonomy have accelerated innovation cycles by introducing lower-cost prototypes and iterative testing models that challenge traditional defense procurement rhythms.

Partnerships between primes and innovative suppliers have become the dominant route to reconcile platform-level integration risks with rapid capability insertion. These collaborations often take the form of demonstrator programs and phased qualification pathways that de-risk novel subsystems while preserving long-term sustainment frameworks. At the same time, maintenance, training, and obsolescence management are emerging as decisive differentiators; companies that provide comprehensive through-life support, digital twin tools, and expedited spare-part logistics gain a competitive edge. Procurement officers evaluate suppliers not solely on system lethality but increasingly on their capacity to deliver predictable availability, cybersecurity resilience, and upgrade roadmaps that preserve interoperability across evolving multi-vendor architectures.

Actionable recommendations for executives to accelerate integration, secure resilient supply chains, and institutionalize sustainment-focused procurement practices for CIWS

Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align capability development with resilient industrial practices and operational adaptability. First, prioritize modular architectures and open interfaces so that platforms can integrate kinetic, directed-energy, and missile-based layers without extensive structural modifications. By doing so, fleets gain the flexibility to adopt incremental upgrades and to swap subsystems as technology matures. Second, invest in domestic supplier development and dual sourcing for critical components, and establish supplier qualification corridors that reduce single-point-of-failure risks while enabling faster responsiveness to geopolitical disruptions. Third, expand demonstrator and live-fire testing programs that validate system performance in representative operational conditions and accelerate lessons-learned cycles; these programs should incorporate coalition interoperability trials to ensure multi-nation operability.

Additionally, adopt doctrine and training updates that reflect automation-enabled engagement chains, ensuring personnel are trained to supervise autonomous engagement modes and to intervene effectively when human judgment is required. Leaders should also embed sustainment considerations early in procurement decisions by demanding clear obsolescence management plans and long-term support commitments from suppliers. Finally, ensure procurement structures include performance-based contracting elements that reward demonstrated availability and lifecycle affordability rather than one-time technical performance metrics, thereby aligning supplier incentives with operational readiness and cost-effective sustainment.

A rigorous, transparent research methodology combining open-source technical validation, expert interviews, and scenario-driven supply chain and capability analysis

This research synthesizes open-source technical literature, defense procurement policy documents, demonstrator program reports, and subject-matter expert interviews to construct a rigorous, defensible analytical foundation. Technical assessments relied on validated performance parameters from public demonstrations, peer-reviewed studies on directed energy and sensor fusion, and manufacturer technical briefings, cross-checked against operational after-action summaries and regulatory guidance. Supply chain and industrial analysis incorporated trade policy documents, supplier announcements, and observable adjustments to sourcing strategies, with particular attention to supplier localization and qualification efforts following tariff changes. Expert interviews spanned platform integration engineers, program managers, and operational commanders and were conducted under conditions that preserved anonymity while enabling candid insights into programmatic trade-offs and capability priorities.

Analytical methods included capability gap analysis, risk-based supply chain assessment, and scenario-driven evaluation of integration options. Where possible, technical claims were corroborated across multiple sources to reduce single-source bias. The approach emphasizes transparency about assumptions and the limitations of open-source data, and it highlights where further classified or proprietary information would materially change program-level recommendations. Throughout, the methodology privileges operational relevance and procurement applicability so that findings can inform acquisition planning, capability roadmaps, and industrial-base investment decisions.

Concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative to integrate technology, sustainment, and procurement strategies to achieve enduring CIWS capability advantages

Increased threat sophistication, rapid technological maturation, and geopolitical pressures have combined to make close-in defense a strategic priority for navies and maritime security forces worldwide. Modern CIWS solutions must balance lethality, responsiveness, and sustainment while integrating into layered defense architectures that span platforms and domains. The most resilient acquisition strategies will emphasize modularity, domestic supplier resilience, and demonstrator-driven risk reduction that shortens the time from concept to operational capability. By harmonizing technology selection with logistics, training, and procurement structures, defense leaders can deliver effective point-defense solutions that enhance platform survivability without compromising fleet readiness or long-term affordability.

Moving forward, organizations that invest early in integration standards, power and cooling upgrades, and advanced training paradigms will be positioned to exploit emerging capabilities such as high-energy lasers and autonomous sensor-to-shooter chains. Those choices will determine not only near-term defensive performance but also the agility of fleets to adapt to evolving threat sets over the coming decade.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Weapon Type

  • 8.1. Gun Based Ciws
    • 8.1.1. 30-60 Mm
    • 8.1.2. <30 Mm
    • 8.1.3. >60 Mm
  • 8.2. Laser Based Ciws
    • 8.2.1. 100-150 Kw
    • 8.2.2. <100 Kw
    • 8.2.3. >150 Kw
  • 8.3. Missile Based Ciws

9. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Platform Type

  • 9.1. Aircraft Carrier
  • 9.2. Amphibious Assault Ship
  • 9.3. Corvette
  • 9.4. Destroyer
  • 9.5. Frigate

10. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Mount Type

  • 10.1. Fixed Turret
  • 10.2. Modular
  • 10.3. Remote Operated
  • 10.4. Rotary Mount

11. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Anti Aircraft
  • 11.2. Anti Drone
  • 11.3. Anti Missile
  • 11.4. Anti Ship Missile

12. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by End User

  • 12.1. Coast Guard
  • 12.2. Marine Corps
  • 12.3. Navy

13. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market

17. China Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Aselsan A.S.
  • 18.6. BAE Systems plc
  • 18.7. Bharat Dynamics Limited
  • 18.8. General Dynamics Corporation
  • 18.9. Hanwha Corporation
  • 18.10. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • 18.11. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • 18.12. L3Harris Technologies
  • 18.13. Leonardo S.p.A.
  • 18.14. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 18.15. MBDA Inc.
  • 18.16. Navantia, S.A.
  • 18.17. Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 18.18. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • 18.19. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • 18.20. Rheinmetall AG
  • 18.21. RTX Corporation
  • 18.22. Saab AB
  • 18.23. Thales Group
  • 18.24. The Boeing Company

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)