乏燃料回收和儲存市場：按儲存方法、材料類型、最終用戶和服務類型分類的全球預測，2026-2032年

預計到 2025 年，乏燃料回收和儲存市場價值將達到 78.4 億美元，到 2026 年將成長到 84.1 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 125.6 億美元，複合年成長率為 6.96%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025	78.4億美元
預計年份：2026年	84.1億美元
預測年份 2032	125.6億美元
複合年成長率 (%)	6.96%

這是一部權威的導論，系統地闡述了影響乏燃料後處理和儲存方案選擇的技術、法規和相關人員策略之間的複雜相互作用。

核燃料生命週期管理需要採用綜合方法，兼顧技術嚴謹性、法規遵循、策略規劃。本導言概述了後處理技術和儲存結構之間複雜的相互作用框架，並重點闡述了影響專案決策的管治和利害關係人相關人員。後續章節將闡明一些核心促進因素，例如不斷變化的政策預期、分離和調整製程的技術進步，以及臨時和長期儲存的後勤實際情況。

本文簡要檢驗了技術、法規和相關人員期望方面的最新模式轉移如何重新定義乏燃料後處理和儲存策略。

近期發生的變革性變化正在重塑乏燃料回收和儲存的策略理念和營運實施方式。化學分離和電化學技術的進步催生了新的回收途徑，而容器和儲存技術的同步發展則提升了儲存的柔軟性。同時，法規結構也在不斷改進，以適應長期管理責任，這正在改變許可流程和合規時間表。

分析見解：2025 年推出的關稅措施如何改變了整個產業的採購趨勢、供應鏈韌性和產業參與策略。

2025年公佈的關稅和貿易相關政策措施，為乏核燃料後處理和儲存相關營業單位的成本結構和供應鏈規劃引入了新的變數。關稅調整將影響進口專用零件和服務以及發展國內製造能力的相對吸引力，這可能會即時對採購計劃造成壓力，因為各企業需要重新審視其供應商組合和合約條款。

詳細的細分市場分析，將儲存方法、材料類型、再加工過程、最終用戶需求和服務模式與專案設計和營運重點連結起來。

細分領域的洞察揭示了不同的技術選擇和服務模式如何影響專案優先順序和資源分配。在考慮儲存方法時，乾式儲存方式（例如桶式儲存和庫式儲存）與濕式儲存方式（例如池式儲存）相比，其運作特性有所不同。乾式系統往往專注於模組化部署和被動式溫度控管，而濕式系統則優先考慮集中式冷卻和庫存管理技術。材料類型也會影響回收策略。混合氧化物和氧化鈾的原料特性需要適當的分離化學處理和加工步驟，這會影響下游製程的處理和安全措施。

全面的區域資訊揭示了美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區如何塑造各自的政策方向、技術採用和夥伴關係模式。

區域趨勢對乏燃料後處理和儲存領域的政策選擇、技術應用和商業性夥伴關係有顯著影響。在美洲，現有庫存水準、不斷演變的法規結構以及工業產能等因素共同決定了專案方向，其中對國內製造能力和全生命週期管理體系的關注度日益提高。同時，歐洲、中東和非洲地區則呈現多樣化的發展模式。有些地區強調多邊合作和技術平台共用，而有些地區則根據地質條件和公共目標，尋求制定符合本國國情的解決方案。

對提供安全、可擴展的再處理和儲存解決方案的技術供應商、營運商、製造商和機構合作夥伴的生態系統進行策略概述。

主要企業和機構正在推動整個乏燃料回收和儲存領域的創新、供應鏈能力建設和專案實施。技術供應商致力於改善分離化學、燃料調整、儲存槽設計和監測系統，而工程和建造公司則將概念設計轉化為可獲得許可的設施。營運商和電力公司在確定性能要求和可行性限制方面發揮核心作用，而研究機構則提供獨立的評估和測試以獲得監管部門的核准。

為高階主管提供切實可行的建議，以加強供應鏈韌性、加快模組化部署並確保相關人員對長期專案成功的信心。

產業領導者應採取果斷行動，提升專案韌性，加速技術成熟，並增強相關人員的信心。首先，他們應進行全面的供應鏈風險評估，識別單點故障，評估替代籌資策略，並為關鍵零件和服務制定緊急時應對計畫。這將減少採購中斷，並使進度安排更好地與許可流程相符。其次，領導者應優先考慮模組化和分階段部​​署策略。這將有助於在嚴格監控下逐步擴大產能，降低前期投資風險，並促進適應性學習。

為了便於制定實際的方案決策，我們採用了穩健的混合方法調查方法，結合了專家訪談、技術文獻綜述、監管分析和基於情境的評估。

本研究採用多面向方法，整合技術文獻、法規分析和專家訪談，以確保獲得平衡且基於證據的觀點。此方法將工程師、政策顧問和專案經理等一手資料與同行評審的研究論文、技術標準和公共監管申請等二級資訊來源結合。透過對這些資訊來源進行三角驗證，交叉檢驗各項論點並明確證據共識，從而得出可靠的結論。

作為策略性結論，我們強調，一體化的方案設計、健全的採購系統和協作管治對於有效處理和儲存乏燃料至關重要。

總之，透過回收和儲存有效管理乏燃料需要整合策略，該策略應協調技術選擇、法規遵循和相關人員參與。雖然分離技術和儲存系統設計的進步正在拓展選擇範圍，但成功實施仍需要具有韌性的供應鏈、適應性強的管治以及與值得信賴的社區的合作。關稅和貿易政策的趨勢為採購和產業政策帶來了新的考量，凸顯了來源多元化和發展本地能力的重要性。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章：調查方法

• 調查設計
• 研究框架
• 市場規模預測
• 數據三角測量
• 調查結果
• 調查的前提
• 研究限制

第3章執行摘要

• 首席體驗長觀點
• 市場規模和成長趨勢
• 2025年市佔率分析
• FPNV定位矩陣，2025
• 新的商機
• 下一代經營模式
• 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

• 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL 分析
• 市場展望
• 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

• 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
• 消費者體驗基準
• 機會映射
• 分銷通路分析
• 價格趨勢分析
• 監理合規和標準框架
• ESG與永續性分析
• 中斷和風險情景
• 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章：乏燃料回收與儲存市場（依儲存方式分類）

• 乾貨儲存
  • 酒桶儲存
  • 地下倉儲設施
• 濕儲存

第9章：乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依材料類型分類

• 混合氧化物
• 鈾氧化物

第10章：乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依最終用戶分類

• 海軍核子反應爐
• 核能發電廠
• 研究核子反應爐

第11章：乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依服務類型分類

• 中間儲存
  • 在核子反應爐區內
  • 核子反應爐設施外
• 永久處置
  • 深地質處置
  • 地質處置

第12章 乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依地區分類

• 北美洲和南美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 歐洲、中東和非洲
  • 歐洲
  • 中東
  • 非洲
• 亞太地區

第13章：乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依類別分類

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第14章 乏燃料回收與儲存市場：依國家分類

• 美國
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英國
• 德國
• 法國
• 俄羅斯
• 義大利
• 西班牙
• 中國
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韓國

第15章：美國乏燃料回收與儲存市場

第16章：中國乏燃料回收與儲存市場

第17章 競爭格局

• 市場集中度分析，2025年
  • 濃度比（CR）
  • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
• 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
• 2025年產品系列分析
• 基準分析，2025 年
• Agence Nationale pour la gestion des Dechets Radioactifs
• Augean PLC
• Babcock International Group PLC
• Bechtel Group Inc.
• China National Nuclear Corporation
• EnergySolutions Inc.
• Fluor Corporation
• Framatome SA
• General Atomics
• GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
• Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy Ltd.
• Holtec International Inc.
• Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited
• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
• NAC International Inc.
• Ontario Power Generation Inc.
• Orano SA
• Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
• Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
• Studsvik AB
• Svensk Karnbranslehantering Aktiebolag
• Veolia Environnement SA
• Waste Control Specialists LLC
• Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

The Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market was valued at USD 7.84 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 8.41 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.96%, reaching USD 12.56 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 7.84 billion
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 8.41 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 12.56 billion
CAGR (%)	6.96%

An authoritative introduction framing the complex intersections of technology, regulation, and stakeholder strategy that drive spent fuel recycling and storage program choices

The nuclear fuel lifecycle demands an integrated approach that balances technical rigor, regulatory compliance, and strategic planning. This introduction frames the complex interplay between recycling technologies and storage architectures, while highlighting the governance and stakeholder dimensions that shape program decisions. The content that follows articulates core drivers including evolving policy expectations, technological progress in separation and conditioning processes, and the logistical realities of interim and long-term storage.

Across jurisdictions, decision-makers increasingly emphasize risk-informed approaches that align safety, security, and non-proliferation priorities with economic and environmental considerations. Consequently, organizations must assess operational trade-offs-ranging from capital intensity and workforce requirements to licensing pathways and community acceptance. In addition, international collaboration and harmonized standards are becoming more salient as countries seek to optimize life-cycle management and minimize long-term liabilities.

This introduction prepares readers to engage with subsequent sections by setting expectations about the types of evidence, analytical perspectives, and decision levers that underpin contemporary program design. It underscores the need for actionable intelligence that supports both near-term operational choices and strategic investments in recycling and storage infrastructure.

A concise examination of recent paradigm shifts in technology, regulation, and stakeholder expectations that are redefining spent fuel recycling and storage strategies

Recent transformative shifts are reshaping both the strategic rationale and operational implementation of spent fuel recycling and storage. Advances in chemical separation and electrochemical techniques are enabling new recycling pathways, while parallel developments in cask and vault technologies are expanding storage flexibility. Meanwhile, regulatory frameworks are maturing to address long-duration stewardship, which changes licensing trajectories and compliance timelines.

Equally important, public expectations and social license considerations are influencing siting and community engagement strategies. As a result, program leaders must integrate early and transparent stakeholder outreach with robust risk communication plans. In addition, supply chain resilience has emerged as a critical focus, prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for critical materials, fabrication capacity for storage systems, and contingency planning for cross-border dependencies.

Taken together, these shifts require a recalibration of business models and project delivery approaches. Decision-makers should expect higher scrutiny on safety and environmental performance, and they must prioritize adaptive governance mechanisms that can respond to changing technical evidence and geopolitical dynamics.

Analytical insights into how tariff measures introduced in 2025 have altered procurement dynamics, supply chain resilience, and industrial participation strategies across the sector

Policy measures announced in 2025 affecting tariffs and trade have introduced new variables into cost structures and supply chain planning for entities engaged in recycling and storage of spent nuclear fuel. Tariff adjustments influence the relative attractiveness of importing specialized components and services versus developing domestic manufacturing capacity, and they can create immediate pressure on procurement timelines as organizations reevaluate supplier portfolios and contractual terms.

In response, project planners are increasingly conducting scenario-based supply chain analyses and stress-testing procurement strategies to identify critical dependencies and potential points of disruption. These analyses are informing decisions about near-term inventory buffers, strategic stockpiles for critical consumables, and whether to accelerate investments in local fabrication capabilities for casks, modular storage systems, and separation equipment. Moreover, regulatory compliance and customs procedures are receiving closer scrutiny to mitigate delays at borders and ensure continuity of specialized transport and handling services.

Importantly, tariffs also interact with procurement policies that prioritize domestic industrial participation and workforce development. As a result, program owners are balancing short-term cost impacts with longer-term industrial strategy objectives, including the potential benefits of cultivating in-country capabilities that strengthen national sovereignty over sensitive nuclear infrastructure. In sum, the tariff environment has heightened the emphasis on resilient procurement design and diversified supplier networks.

In-depth segmentation insights that link storage methods, material types, recycling processes, end-user needs, and service models to program design and operational priorities

Segment-level insights reveal how different technology choices and service models direct program priorities and resource allocation. When considering storage method, dry storage pathways such as cask storage and vault storage present distinct operational profiles compared with wet storage options like pool storage; dry systems often emphasize modular deployment and passive heat management, while wet systems prioritize centralized cooling and inventory management practices. Material type also shapes recycling strategy, as feedstock characteristics for mixed oxide and uranium oxide require tailored separation chemistries and conditioning steps that influence downstream handling and safeguards.

Recycling processes further differentiate technological readiness and facility complexity. Aqueous separation routes such as PUREX have established industrial practice, whereas pyroprocessing approaches-comprising electrorefining and molten salt process variants-introduce alternative material flows and potentially different waste streams. UREX and other advanced partitioning concepts add further nuance to process integration and radiological protection planning. End-user segmentation reflects operational priorities: naval reactors demand compact, high-assurance solutions for secure propulsion fuel management; commercial nuclear power plants focus on throughput, regulatory consistency, and long-term stewardship obligations; research reactors emphasize flexibility and specialized conditioning for varied experimental fuels.

Service type distinctions drive planning horizons and stakeholder expectations. Interim storage options include at-reactor-site arrangements and away-from-reactor-site facilities, which carry differing implications for transportation logistics, security protocols, and community engagement. Permanent disposal alternatives such as deep borehole disposal and geological disposal each entail unique site characterization, long-term monitoring, and institutional control strategies. Integrating these segmentation dimensions enables more granular program design that aligns technology, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations.

Comprehensive regional intelligence that clarifies how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each shape policy direction, technology uptake, and partnership models

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on policy choices, technology adoption, and commercial partnerships across the spent fuel recycling and storage landscape. In the Americas, a combination of legacy inventories, evolving regulatory frameworks, and industrial capacity considerations shapes program trajectories, with increased attention to domestic fabrication and lifecycle stewardship arrangements. Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous mix of approaches: some jurisdictions emphasize multinational cooperation and shared technical platforms, while others pursue nationally tailored solutions based on geological suitability and public policy objectives.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid energy demand growth and an expanding fleet of reactors are driving significant interest in both recycling innovation and modular storage solutions. Cross-border collaborations and technology partnerships are common, reflecting both commercial opportunities and efforts to harmonize safety standards. Across all regions, geopolitical shifts and trade policy changes influence supply chains, while public engagement and institutional capacity determine the pace at which complex programs move from concept to implementation.

Consequently, stakeholders planning international projects must factor in regional regulatory harmonization, licensing practices, workforce availability, and cultural approaches to risk communication. A regionally informed strategy supports targeted investments, appropriate contracting models, and effective stakeholder outreach.

A strategic overview of the ecosystem of technology providers, operators, manufacturers, and institutional partners that enable safe and scalable recycling and storage solutions

Key companies and institutional actors drive innovation, supply chain capabilities, and program execution across the spent fuel recycling and storage domain. Technology vendors contribute to improvements in separation chemistry, fuel conditioning, cask design, and monitoring systems, while engineering and construction firms translate conceptual designs into licensable facilities. Operators and utilities play a central role in defining performance requirements and feasibility constraints, and research institutions provide independent evaluation and testing that informs regulatory acceptance.

In addition, manufacturers of specialized components-such as thermal management systems, radiation-hardened electronics, and heavy fabrication services-remain critical enablers of deployment timelines. Financial and advisory firms support contractual structures and public-private partnership arrangements, especially for long-duration stewardship obligations. Finally, standards organizations and international nuclear agencies shape interoperability and best-practice guidance, bringing technical rigor to safety, security, and safeguards considerations.

Collectively, these actors form an ecosystem in which collaboration, risk-sharing, and transparent governance are essential to advance complex recycling and disposal projects. Stakeholders should prioritize partners with demonstrated regulatory experience, robust quality assurance programs, and a track record of delivering within stringent safety frameworks.

Actionable recommendations for senior executives to strengthen supply chain resilience, accelerate modular deployment, and secure stakeholder trust for long-term program success

Industry leaders should take decisive steps to increase program resilience, accelerate technology maturation, and strengthen stakeholder trust. First, they should implement comprehensive supply chain risk assessments that identify single points of failure, evaluate alternative sourcing strategies, and define contingency plans for critical components and services. By doing so, organizations can reduce procurement disruption and better align timelines with licensing processes. Second, leaders should prioritize modular and staged deployment strategies that allow incremental capacity increases while maintaining rigorous oversight, which reduces upfront capital exposure and facilitates adaptive learning.

Third, investing in community engagement and transparent risk communication yields dividends in permitting and social license; establishing independent advisory panels and third-party reviews can build public confidence. Fourth, organizations should seek strategic partnerships that combine technical expertise with project delivery capabilities, enabling shared risk and accelerated technology adoption. Fifth, workforce development initiatives, including upskilling programs and industry-academic partnerships, will be essential to sustain long-term operations and to support evolving technical demands.

Finally, decision-makers should integrate robust governance mechanisms that align safety, security, and non-proliferation objectives with commercial incentives. Collectively, these recommendations aim to balance near-term operational effectiveness with long-term stewardship responsibilities.

A robust mixed-methods research methodology combining expert interviews, technical literature review, regulatory analysis, and scenario-based evaluation to inform practical program decisions

This research applies a multi-method approach that synthesizes technical literature, regulatory analysis, and expert interviews to ensure a balanced and evidence-based perspective. The methodology integrates primary inputs from subject-matter experts, including engineers, policy advisors, and program managers, with secondary sources such as peer-reviewed studies, technical standards, and public regulatory filings. Triangulation of these sources supports robust conclusions by cross-validating claims and highlighting areas of convergent evidence.

Qualitative analysis explored technology readiness, operational constraints, and stakeholder perspectives, while process mapping identified critical interfaces among recycling, conditioning, transport, and storage systems. Regulatory review focused on licensing pathways, environmental assessment expectations, and international safeguards obligations, providing context for program design choices. Scenario analysis examined alternative procurement and deployment strategies to surface practical implications without projecting specific market values.

Throughout, the research emphasized transparency in assumptions and limitations, capturing known uncertainties and recommending areas for further technical validation. This methodological foundation ensures that findings are practical, defensible, and oriented toward informing policy and investment decisions.

A strategic conclusion emphasizing integrated program design, resilient procurement, and collaborative governance as essentials for effective spent fuel recycling and storage

In conclusion, effective management of spent fuel through recycling and storage requires an integrated strategy that aligns technology selection, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement. Progress in separation technologies and storage system design expands available options, yet successful implementation depends on resilient supply chains, adaptive governance, and credible community outreach. Tariff and trade policy dynamics have introduced new considerations for procurement and industrial policy, underscoring the importance of diversified sourcing and local capability development.

Segment-specific choices-spanning storage methods, material types, recycling processes, end-user needs, and service models-necessitate tailored program architectures that reflect technical constraints and policy priorities. Regional differences further influence licensing, partnership models, and public acceptance, which argues for context-sensitive strategies. Finally, collaboration across the ecosystem of technology vendors, operators, regulators, and research institutions remains essential to reconcile safety imperatives with commercial and societal objectives.

Taken together, these conclusions point toward a pragmatic pathway: pursue modular, staged deployment; invest in workforce and industrial capacity; adopt transparent stakeholder engagement practices; and design procurement strategies that balance near-term needs with long-term stewardship responsibilities.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Storage Method

• 8.1. Dry Storage
  • 8.1.1. Cask Storage
  • 8.1.2. Vault Storage
• 8.2. Wet Storage

9. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Material Type

• 9.1. Mixed Oxide
• 9.2. Uranium Oxide

10. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by End-User

• 10.1. Naval Reactors
• 10.2. Nuclear Power Plants
• 10.3. Research Reactors

11. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Service Type

• 11.1. Interim Storage
  • 11.1.1. At Reactor Site
  • 11.1.2. Away From Reactor Site
• 11.2. Permanent Disposal
  • 11.2.1. Deep Borehole Disposal
  • 11.2.2. Geological Disposal

12. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market

16. China Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 17.5. Agence Nationale pour la gestion des Dechets Radioactifs
• 17.6. Augean PLC
• 17.7. Babcock International Group PLC
• 17.8. Bechtel Group Inc.
• 17.9. China National Nuclear Corporation
• 17.10. EnergySolutions Inc.
• 17.11. Fluor Corporation
• 17.12. Framatome SA
• 17.13. General Atomics
• 17.14. GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
• 17.15. Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy Ltd.
• 17.16. Holtec International Inc.
• 17.17. Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited
• 17.18. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
• 17.19. NAC International Inc.
• 17.20. Ontario Power Generation Inc.
• 17.21. Orano SA
• 17.22. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
• 17.23. Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
• 17.24. Studsvik AB
• 17.25. Svensk Karnbranslehantering Aktiebolag
• 17.26. Veolia Environnement SA
• 17.27. Waste Control Specialists LLC
• 17.28. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 12. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 2. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 90. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 91. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 92. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 93. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 94. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 96. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 97. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 98. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 99. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 100. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 103. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 104. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 105. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 106. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 107. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 108. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 109. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 110. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 111. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 112. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 113. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 114. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 116. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 119. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 120. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 121. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 122. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 123. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 124. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 125. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 126. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 127. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 128. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 129. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 130. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 131. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 132. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 133. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 134. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 135. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 136. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 144. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 145. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 146. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 147. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 148. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 149. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 150. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 151. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 152. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 153. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 154. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 155. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 156. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 157. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 158. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 159. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 160. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 161. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 162. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 163. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 164. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 165. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 166. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 167. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 168. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 169. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 170. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 171. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 172. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 173. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 174. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 175. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 176. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 177. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 178. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 179. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 180. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 181. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 182. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 183. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 184. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)